• China condemns US and Israeli military strikes on Iran, calling for an immediate ceasefire and protection of civilians.
  • Strikes risk disrupting energy shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, threatening global energy security and supply chains.
  • China positions itself as a diplomatic mediator, supporting Iran's sovereignty while avoiding direct military involvement.

China has voiced strong opposition to military strikes by the United States and Israel against Iran, urging an immediate halt to hostilities and a return to diplomatic negotiations on nuclear issues. The strikes, which began around February 28, 2026, targeted sites including Tehran and prompted Iranian counterattacks on US bases in Gulf states, Jordan, and Iraq, resulting in civilian casualties and regional spillover.

Foreign Minister Wang Yi, in calls with Iranian, Omani, and French counterparts on March 3, 2026, affirmed China's support for Iran's defense of sovereignty and accused the US and Israel of violating UN principles and international law. "What we are witnessing is a dangerous escalation that undermines global stability," Wang Yi said, according to people familiar with the discussions. Spokesperson Mao Ning echoed this stance in a March 3 press briefing, condemning the strikes amid ongoing US-Iran talks and warning against further escalation that could impact critical maritime routes.

The economic implications are significant, with the Strait of Hormuz—a vital chokepoint for global oil shipments—at risk of disruption. China has urged all parties to safeguard these routes to prevent oil price spikes and supply chain fallout. Beijing has reportedly pressured Iran to avoid actions that could block Qatari gas exports, highlighting concerns over energy security. Market analysts note that any prolonged conflict could drive up energy costs and strain global inflation pressures, with Brent crude futures already showing volatility in recent trading sessions.

Politically, China is positioning itself as a mediator, offering constructive roles in UN efforts for peace while criticizing what it calls a "law of the jungle" approach by major powers. This aligns with Beijing's strategic partnership with Iran but stops short of military commitments, similar to past responses. The strikes have strained US-China ties and bolstered alignment among China, Russia, and Iran against Western actions. China partnered with Russia for a UN Security Council emergency session, where both nations denounced the attacks as unacceptable.

On the ground, civilian deaths from strikes and retaliations in Gulf states, Jordan, and Iraq have drawn condemnation, with China calling protection of civilians a "red line." One Chinese national was killed in the conflict, prompting evacuations of around 3,000 expatriates to ensure their safety. Regional states have voiced concerns over sovereignty violations, adding to the diplomatic complexity. Efforts to reach US and Israeli officials for comment were unsuccessful, but sources indicate that negotiations remain fragile, with Iran denying nuclear weapon ambitions and tensions escalating from failed nuclear talks.

Looking ahead, the short-term risk includes a wider Middle East war or nuclear escalation, with experts noting that China's restraint prioritizes economic stability over deepening alliances. In the long term, China may lead UN efforts for de-escalation and push for a diplomatic nuclear settlement. As of now, the situation remains fluid, with ongoing talks and potential for further developments that could reshape regional dynamics.