- Iran's Foreign Ministry publicly rebukes IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi, urging him to avoid political statements and focus on technical duties.
- The exchange highlights deepening tensions over Iran's nuclear program, with Tehran accusing the IAEA of double standards and politicization.
- Analysts warn that continued diplomatic friction could undermine prospects for cooperation and impact regional risk perceptions.
A Direct Challenge
Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmaeil Baghaei, on Thursday directly challenged IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi, telling him to “stop issuing political statements” and instead focus on fulfilling his professional responsibilities as head of the UN nuclear watchdog. The remarks, reported by state media, come amid heightened tensions between Tehran and the agency over inspections and reporting on Iran’s nuclear activities.
“The IAEA must avoid politicization and act professionally,” Baghaei said, according to the official IRNA news agency. He accused Grossi of making statements that “undermine the agency’s credibility” and urged the watchdog to adhere to its technical mandate. Iran’s Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a request for further comment.
Strained Cooperation
The latest exchange reflects a broader deterioration in Iran-IAEA relations. Tehran has long insisted its nuclear program is peaceful and conducted under its rights as a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). However, it accuses the agency of applying double standards and bowing to pressure from the US and its allies.
Earlier this year, the IAEA Board of Governors passed a resolution censuring Iran for failing to fully cooperate with inspectors, a move Tehran condemned as politically motivated. In response, Iran announced it had installed new centrifuges and expanded enrichment activities, further complicating diplomatic efforts.
“The IAEA’s reports have been used as a pretext for sanctions and political pressure, not for technical oversight,” Baghaei said, echoing statements from other Iranian officials. He linked the agency’s stance to broader regional tensions, including past attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities attributed to Israel and the US.
Implications and Outlook
The public sniping between Tehran and the IAEA comes at a delicate time. Diplomats have been struggling to revive the 2015 nuclear deal, while regional tensions remain high amid the Israel-Hamas conflict and US sanctions. Without a mutual willingness to separate technical safeguards from political disputes, experts say cooperation could continue to erode.
Analysts warn that further deterioration could lead to more aggressive IAEA reporting or even a referral to the UN Security Council, which would escalate the standoff. For now, the ball is in Grossi’s court as Iran demands a shift in tone.
This article was updated to include additional context on the IAEA resolution.