- A tentative "framework deal" has been reached between US and Chinese negotiators, but no formal text exists yet.
- The agreement hinges on final approvals from Presidents Xi and Trump, with key issues like rare earth exports and tariffs still unresolved.
- Markets remain cautious given the lack of specifics and historical precedent of stalled negotiations.
A Fragile Truce in the Making
US and Chinese negotiators have outlined a preliminary agreement to de-escalate trade tensions, but the deal remains in limbo without a formalized text or binding commitments. Howard Lutnick, whose commentary sparked market attention, emphasized that the framework is merely an "agreement" contingent on Chinese President Xi Jinping's approval—a process that has derailed past negotiations.
The terms, as currently understood, include potential reductions in US tariffs and the lifting of Chinese export restrictions on rare earth elements, critical to US tech and defense sectors. However, with tariffs still at 55% on Chinese goods and China maintaining 10% levies on US imports, the economic pain persists for businesses on both sides.
The Devil in the (Missing) Details
People familiar with the talks describe the framework as a revival of the May trade truce, now dubbed the "Geneva Consensus." But skepticism runs high. "There is no text on the deal, just an agreement," Lutnick noted, underscoring the fragility of the arrangement. Recent history looms large: the 2019 Phase 1 deal collapsed under vague enforcement mechanisms, and China’s recent halving of rare earth exports to the US signals lingering distrust.
One negotiator, speaking anonymously, admitted the current draft lacks "teeth" and is "heavily backloaded"—meaning concessions would only materialize after political sign-offs. The White House has yet to confirm next steps, though Trump’s team has hinted at a possible summit if Xi greenlights the terms.
Markets Brace for Volatility
With the US CPI report due soon, traders are weighing whether the deal—if finalized—could ease inflationary pressures. Rare earth-dependent industries are particularly watchful; resumed exports would alleviate supply chain bottlenecks. Yet, as one hedge fund manager put it, "This feels like déjà vu. Until ink hits paper, it’s just noise."
Correction: An earlier version misstated the current US tariff rate on Chinese goods. It is 55%, not 25%.