• Iran signals it expects China to relay its message to Washington ahead of Trump's visit to Beijing.
  • Tehran calls for permanent ceasefire, sanctions relief, and recognition of its rights.
  • The Iran conflict emerges as a high-stakes issue for the Trump-Xi summit.

Iran enlists China as messenger

Iran's ambassador to China said Beijing could deliver Tehran's message to major powers, including calls for a permanent ceasefire, an end to sanctions, and recognition of Iran's rights. The remarks come just days before President Donald Trump's visit to Beijing, where the Iran war is expected to be a central topic.

Active diplomacy before the summit

Chinese and Iranian foreign ministers held talks in Beijing last week, with China publicly emphasizing the need for a comprehensive ceasefire. Discussions also covered the Strait of Hormuz, Iran's nuclear program, and sanctions. Tehran also backed China's four-point peace proposal, according to people familiar with the matter.

Trump seeks China's cooperation

The U.S. is pressing China to use its influence on Iran to meet American-preferred terms, as Trump looks to ease Middle East tensions that are hurting the global economy. However, U.S. sanctions targeting Chinese entities accused of supporting Iranian military capabilities could complicate the diplomatic path. China positions itself as a de-escalation broker, linking the effort to broader regional stability.

"We hope all parties will exercise restraint and work together to prevent further escalation," a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson said, declining to comment on potential U.S. pressure.

Implications for markets and energy security

The Strait of Hormuz remains a key risk, as any disruption to shipping could roil global energy markets. The summit's outcome may shape sanctions enforcement and trade compliance, with long-term effects on shipping costs and energy prices. Analysts are watching whether the talks yield any concrete de-escalation pathway acceptable to Iran.

Correction: An earlier version of this article misstated the timing of the foreign ministers' meeting. It took place last week, not this week.