- Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari suggests the labor market's "breakeven" level may now be as low as 75,000 jobs per month, a significant downward revision.
- The recent stretch of job gains, at just 73,000–75,000 per month, marks the weakest period since the pandemic and has shifted the Fed's stance toward rate cuts.
- Markets are now pricing in a near 90% probability of a rate cut at the September FOMC meeting as the unemployment rate climbs to 4.3%.
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis President Neel Kashkari has indicated that the U.S. job market may now only need to add around 75,000 jobs per month to keep the unemployment rate stable, a stark reassessment of the labor market's underlying strength. This new "breakeven" estimate, which reflects the number of jobs needed to simply keep pace with working-age population growth, is a clear signal that the Fed believes the employment landscape is cooling significantly.
The shift in perspective from a prominent central bank official comes as the most recent jobs reports have shown gains of only about 73,000 to 75,000, the weakest stretch since the pandemic. This sustained softness has prompted a notable pivot within the Fed. Officials like Kashkari and San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly have moved from emphasizing patience to openly supporting rate cuts. The unemployment rate's climb to 4.3%, its highest level in nearly four years, has added urgency to their calls for policy adjustment.
According to people familiar with the matter, the expectation for a rate cut at the September meeting is now exceedingly high, with traders pricing in roughly a 90% chance. The weakening job creation is fueling broader concerns about economic momentum, particularly as businesses grapple with higher costs from newly imposed tariffs. The upcoming benchmark revisions to official payroll data, due September 9, are expected to further darken the picture; some economists forecast job growth from the past year will be revised down by over 775,000 jobs.
“What we’re seeing is a fundamental shift in the labor market’s dynamics,” said one economist who asked not to be named discussing sensitive data. “The prior estimates for sustainable job growth were simply too high given current demographic trends and demand.”
The Fed’s potential policy shift arrives amid heightened political scrutiny, with the upcoming presidential election placing a spotlight on economic data. Concerns about the central bank's independence have been flagged by some analysts if political pressure for looser policy mounts regardless of the underlying economic fundamentals.
Efforts to reach a spokesperson for the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis for further comment were not immediately successful. The focus now turns squarely to the next round of jobs data and the September FOMC meeting, where the Fed is widely expected to take action to shore up the slowing economy.