- Trump’s demand for lower rates clashes with the Fed’s latest decision to keep borrowing costs unchanged.
- Two officials dissented in favor of a hike, underscoring the committee’s inflation concerns.
- Markets now see another increase as more likely than a cut, with the next meeting in December.
President Donald Trump renewed his pressure campaign on the Federal Reserve, declaring that the central bank “hates to cut interest rates,” but the latest policy decision shows the Fed is more worried about persistent inflation than about political rhetoric.
The Federal Open Market Committee voted 10–2 on October 28 to hold its benchmark rate at 3.75%–4.00%, following a quarter-point increase in September. Governors Lisa Cook and Beth Hammack dissented, preferring another hike—not a cut—according to the Fed’s statement. The split reveals a committee focused on bringing inflation back to its 2% target, even as Trump publicly pushes for cheaper borrowing costs.
“Politics played no role” in the decision, Chair Kevin Warsh said, addressing the elephant in the room. Trump, who appointed Warsh, has continued to express confidence in him while criticizing the committee’s stance. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also reiterated support for Warsh on October 29.
The central issue is inflation, not an inherent opposition to lowering rates. September consumer-price inflation stood at 3.7% year over year, well above the Fed’s 2% goal (which it measures using the personal consumption expenditures price index). Energy costs remain elevated, and the rapid buildout of AI data centers is adding to price pressures, Warsh noted.
Market Reaction and Economic Outlook
U.S. stocks pared gains after the announcement but finished higher. Longer-term Treasury yields rose as traders slightly reduced expectations of further tightening, though another increase remained the prevailing bet. Market pricing suggests roughly an 80% probability of a hike at the December 8–9 meeting, with another possibly by March, according to Reuters (TRI).
The Fed described economic growth as proceeding at a “strong pace,” with resilient consumer spending and robust capital investment. That strength gives policymakers little reason to cut rates to support activity. Warsh also pointed out that borrowing conditions have tightened for some businesses and households, with the average 30-year mortgage rate reaching 7.4% earlier in October.
The decision came six days before the November 3 midterm elections, with affordability a top campaign issue. Trump has sought to remove Governor Cook over mortgage-fraud allegations she denies; a June Supreme Court ruling allowed her to remain in office while litigation continues. The administration renewed its efforts in September, making Fed independence a legal and governance matter.
Looking ahead, the December meeting will be key. Experts like Michael Pearce of Oxford Economics and Michael Reynolds of Glenemede see elevated fuel prices, AI-related inflation, and a resilient labor market supporting a restrictive stance. Warsh offered a more optimistic view: productivity gains could allow inflation to fall without a sharp rise in unemployment.
For now, the evidence points to a pause with the risk of further tightening—not the cuts Trump is demanding.