Thank you, Lucy, and welcome, everyone, to the O-I Glass fourth quarter and year-end conference call. Our discussion today will be led by Gordon Hardie, our CEO, and John Haudrich, our CFO.

Following prepared remarks, we will host a Q&A session. Presentation materials for this call are available on the company's website.

Please review the Safe Harbor comments and disclosure of our use of non-GAAP financial measures included in those materials. I'd now like to turn the call over to Gordon, who will start on slide 3.

Good morning, everyone, and thank you for your interest in O-I Glass. Today, we will review our full year and fourth quarter 2025 results, discuss recent business trends, and provide an update on our strategic initiatives.

We'll also outline our 2026 outlook and progress towards our 2027 Investor Day targets. Before we begin, I want to recognize the dedication of the entire O-I team.

Your commitment and execution continue to strengthen our performance. Last night, we reported full year adjusted earnings of $1.60 per share.

Supported by a stable top line, adjusted earnings nearly doubled versus 2024, and free cash flow rebounded to $168 million. These results reflect meaningful progress against our strategic objectives and were in line with our most recent upgraded guidance.

A key contributor was the continued outperformance of Fit to Win, which delivered $300 million of benefits in 2025 and more than offset ongoing macroeconomic pressures. We exited the year with positive momentum as fourth quarter adjusted earnings increased meaningfully versus the prior year period.

Looking ahead, we expect continued progress in 2026, including another strong year of Fit to Win execution, even as market conditions remain challenging. We are reaffirming our 2027 Investor Day financial targets.

Despite challenging end markets, we have increased our cumulative Fit to Win benefit target, reinforcing our confidence in achieving our 2027 adjusted EBITDA goal. As a result, we expect to continue improving earnings, expanding economic profit, strengthening free cash flow, and delivering sustainable long-term value for shareholders.

John and I will provide more detail on recent performance and our outlook. Let's now turn to page 4 to recap our strong full year 2025 results.

As you can see, our performance improved across our key financial metrics. We created intrinsic value, with economic spread expanding by 200 basis points, driven by stronger earnings, more disciplined capital allocation, and continued network optimization.

As intended, we maintained a stable top line. Average selling prices were steady, while favorable FX largely offset a decline in volumes.

Our shipments in tons were down 2.5% amid a 3% decline in consumer consumption. A few insights to add: on a unit basis, our shipments were down only 1.5%, reflecting our deliberate shift towards lighter weight and smaller format bottles with strong margins.

A major project startup in Europe impacted shipments nearly 1%, and finally, we capitalized on emerging opportunities in pockets of growth as higher value categories such as premium spirits, food, NABs, and RTDs outperformed trends in mainstream beer and wine. We shifted our mix about 1% towards a higher quality book of business.

Overall, we believe O-I maintained or modestly improved market share as we continue to upgrade our business portfolio. Adjusted EBITDA increased 11% with margins expanding 220 basis points as Fit to Win benefits more than offset modest pressure from net price and volumes.

Adjusted EPS nearly doubled, driven by stronger operating performance and a lower effective tax rate. Free cash flow improved by approximately $300 million, supported by higher adjusted earnings, favorable working capital management, and a 30% reduction in capital expenditures.

This improvement was achieved despite $128 million of restructuring payments, which are expected to taper after 2026. Finally, leverage improved by nearly half a turn to 3.5x, and we remain on track to reach approximately 2.5x leverage by year-end 2027.

Stepping back, we continue to operate in a challenging environment as the value chain works through the long tail of post-COVID normalization. Against this backdrop, we're taking a highly disciplined approach, enhancing our portfolio, executing Fit to Win, and maintaining rigorous capital allocation, which positions us well as markets eventually recover.

The common thread behind these results is execution, particularly Fit to Win, which we will now discuss on page 5. Fit to Win is a core value driver for our business.

The effort continues to deliver significant cost reductions while optimizing our network and value chain. Cost discipline is not just defensive; our cost mindset and discipline strengthens our competitive position, which is a critical engine to enable future profitable growth.

In 2025, Fit to Win delivered $300 million of savings, exceeding our original target of at least $250 million. Momentum remained strong in the fourth quarter with benefits of approximately $80 million.

For 2026, we expect at least $275 million of additional savings. Given this progress, we've increased our three-year cumulative Fit to Win target to at least $750 million, up from $650 million.

Let's discuss progress across the different phases of the initiative. Phase A, focused on SG&A streamlining and initial network optimization, generated approximately $180 million of benefits in 2025.

We expect an additional $135 million in 2026 as we advance later-stage SG&A initiatives and finalize previously announced elimination of approximately 13% of excess capacity by mid-2026, with remaining actions primarily in Europe. Phase B, which targets the end-to-end value chain transformation, delivered approximately $120 million of benefits in 2025, ahead of expectations.

We anticipate at least $140 million of savings in 2026 as we progress through the rollout of total organization effectiveness across the plant network, with full implementation expected by year-end. We're also accelerating procurement and energy initiatives to drive incremental savings.

Importantly, the upside opportunities in Phase B drove our increased 2027 target. Overall, Fit to Win is delivering faster and stronger results than planned, notably in our Phase B projects, and we remain fully committed to achieving our 2026 and updated 2027 targets.

With that, I'll turn it over to John to review fourth quarter performance and our 2026 outlook starting on page 6.

Thank you, Gordon, and good morning, everyone. I'll start with a review of our fourth quarter performance as Gordon has already covered full year 2025 results.

O-I delivered a solid fourth quarter with higher adjusted earnings supported by a stable top line. Net sales were approximately $1.5 billion, and average selling prices were essentially flat, while favorable FX largely offset a mid-single-digit decline in volumes.

Adjusted earnings rebounded meaningfully, improving from a net loss in the prior year to 20 cents per share. This improvement was driven by strong Fit to Win benefits, higher production levels, and a lower effective tax rate, which more than offset modest net price pressure and softer volumes.

Overall, we delivered another solid quarterly performance, reflecting disciplined execution, continued cost reduction, and sustained momentum from our strategic initiatives. Now let's turn to page 7 to review segment operating profit.

Momentum remained strong in the fourth quarter with segment operating profit increasing 30% to $177 million and margins expanding 280 basis points. In the Americas, segment operating profit rose 40%, driven by higher net price and continued Fit to Win benefits.

Volumes declined 10%, which was concentrated in beer and spirits, while other categories like food and NAB were more stable. Based on market data, about half of this decline was due to lower consumption given ongoing affordability challenges, change in consumer behavior affecting many markets, and weather-related disruption in Brazil.

Evolving US trade and immigration policies also impacted consumption and drove inventory adjustments across the value chain in the US and Mexico, which also weighed on shipments. Additionally, results benefited from a one-time $6 million insurance settlement related to a prior year event.

In Europe, segment operating profit increased 8%, reflecting contributions from strategic initiatives and higher production following last year's inventory reductions. Net price was a headwind, and volumes declined 3.5%.

Based on market data, consumption was down low single digits, while shipments were also impacted by a shift in order patterns and other factors at a few customers. Shipments were stable or slightly higher in wine and food, while beer and spirits remained soft.

Trends were weaker in the UK and Italy, but stronger across other markets. Importantly, all actions to eliminate excess capacity are expected to be completed in the first half of 2026, materially improving Europe's operating trajectory.

Overall, segment operating profit increased solidly, demonstrating disciplined execution and the continued success of our initiatives. Taken together, these trends inform our expectations for 2026, which I'll discuss on page 8.

Looking ahead, we expect to build on our momentum and deliver improved results in 2026. The top line should be stable or modestly higher, supported by slightly better gross price and favorable FX as sales volumes are expected to be flat or slightly down.

As markets gradually stabilize, we will continue to optimize our portfolio, including exiting unprofitable business to improve economic profit, while maintaining or growing market share. We anticipate adjusted EBITDA of $1.25 to $1.3 billion, representing up to 7% growth versus 2025.

This includes an estimated $150 million energy cost step-up as favorable European energy contracts expired at year-end. Excluding this impact, adjusted EBITDA would increase by up to 22%, highlighting the strength of our underlying operating improvements.

As Gordon noted, we expect to benefit from at least $275 million of incremental Fit to Win actions, which should support improved performance despite modestly lower net price and flat or slightly lower volumes. We project adjusted EPS of $1.65 to $1.90, representing up to 19% growth, assuming a tax rate of 30% to 33%.

Free cash flow is expected to approximate $200 million, reflecting higher earnings partially offset by slightly higher CapEx, which should approximate $450 million, and about $150 million of restructuring cash costs, which should decline after 2026. The first quarter will be our most challenging year-over-year comparison due to tariff pre-buying, a one-time insurance recovery in the prior year, and a seasonally higher tax rate.

Volumes will likely be down mid to high single digits, given tough comps and sluggish demand. Over the balance of the year, results should improve as comparisons ease and Fit to Win benefits continue to ramp, particularly as European capacity actions and TOE implementation progresses.

Additional guidance details are included in the appendix. I'll now turn it back to Gordon to discuss progress towards our 2027 targets and concluding remarks, starting on page 9.

Thanks, John. Reflecting on our solid momentum, we are reaffirming our 2027 Investor Day targets.

As you can see, we are making solid progress across our key objectives. Adjusted EBITDA and margins are improving, Fit to Win is accelerating, free cash flow conversion is improving, our balance sheet continues to strengthen, and our economic spread has rebounded.

Importantly, the business is moving in the right direction across all dimensions. Let's conclude on page 10.

In summary, we are making solid progress in building a stronger foundation for the future. While conditions remain challenging, we are focused on improving competitiveness and preparing for volume recovery beyond 2026.

Importantly, Fit to Win is a new, disciplined management system that drives consistent performance improvement regardless of market headwinds. As a result, margins and adjusted earnings are rising, free cash flow is improving, and our balance sheet continues to strengthen.

Most importantly, execution is strong and momentum is building. Thank you for your continued support.

We are now happy to take any questions.

Thanks, guys. Thanks, operator.

Good morning, everybody. Hey, Gordon, just going back to the fourth quarter and the 10% volume decline in the Americas.

How much of that do you attribute towards just year-end inventory adjustments? Obviously, it was a very tough year for many of your end markets throughout 2025 and assume there was a fair amount of clean out going into 2026.

Just curious as to your thoughts. Then how are volumes in the region performing thus far in 2026?

I know you have a tough comp from what you mentioned in terms of the pre-buy, etc.

Thanks, Ghansham. We continue to see sort of inventory adjustments in North America, particularly in spirits, and in beer particularly on beer originating from Mexico, given some of the changes in consumer behavior.

We would say somewhere up to maybe half of that was in industry or inventory adjustments. They're the two main drivers of that.

There was also a bit of destocking in wine, but I think we believe that's largely cleared. The big areas have been beer and spirits.

We continue to see fairly high stocks in spirits. I think the inventory-to-sales ratio is still running about 1.7, 1.8, which is historically high versus the long-run average of about 1.3.

It continues to be a challenge. However, as we laid out, our segment profit continues to improve in the Americas as we drive Fit to Win, and that helps us overcome these kind of short-term inventory adjustments.

We expect those to continue in the first quarter, given the high level of stock in North America. We continue then, on the other hand, to drive Fit to Win and also eke out pockets of growth across food, across NAB, particularly waters is particularly strong for us in North America.

That's how we see the first quarter in North America, Ghansham.

Got it. Thanks for that.

Then as it relates to the expanded savings, $750 versus the $650-plus before, is that just a function of just the volumes being lower than you thought and so you're taking additional actions? Then just one final clarification on the energy headwind of $150 million for 2026, is that just a one and done and will it just be specific to '26 or will there be any sort of lingering impact 2027 onwards?

Thanks so much.

Yeah. I'll take the first part.

[coughs] So, would you take the energy question?

I'll take the energy question. Go ahead.

Dude, let me just start with that one. On the energy side, yes, the $150 million energy reset is pretty much a kind of a one and done.

The contracts that we had that were multi-year contracts that expired at the end of the year were at rates before the Russia war with Ukraine, which were at low rates. Those expired at the end of 20 '25.

We have since been basically layering in contracts and hedges over the course of the last year. We're substantially contracted on our energy exposure in 2026 in Europe.

We're confident about the $150 million, which is substantially at prices below current TTF, but still a ramp-up from where we were in the past.

Ghansham, with regard to the additional savings, it really is not because of the volume. I think we pointed out in earlier calls and particularly on Investor Day, 650 was the original target, and obviously we'd a bigger bucket to go after as the savings came faster than planned, almost 50% of the savings in the first 15 months, and the organization's ability to go after and execute those savings.

Then we're able to get after some of the stuff that we saw embedded, but didn't have a clear line of sight to, say, a year ago. Now coming to fruition and being able to execute that, that obviously helps offset the volume, but it's not because of the volume, to speak.

I think they're separate issues, but certainly it underpins our confidence in delivering our 2027 number.

Perfect. Thanks for that.

Thanks, Ghansham.

Hi, good morning. This is Kyle Benvenuto stepping in for George.

Regarding the flat to slightly down volume outlook, does this include the impact of exiting unprofitable business, or is that excluded? What is the volume impact associated with walking away from that business?

Thank you.

I would say, Kyle, yeah, thanks for the question. The outlook for 2026, where we say flat to slightly down, does incorporate our mix management efforts, which also includes our efforts to improve our premium and mix of business, grow market share in this area, but also exiting unprofitable, negative EP business.

For example, if you go back to our Investor Day over about a year ago or so, we had said that there is about 4% of our total volume that was deeply negative EP, and we wanted to address that. We want to address that either by raising prices in those books of business or exiting them.

Over this last year, we probably saw about a 1% movement in that book, and we expect to continue to chip away at that. That is included in that outlook for the next year.

Maybe there's another 1% or so type of movement as we continue to mix manage that.

Thank you. Then just to follow up, the Fit to Win was designed to lower your cost position and open up doors to new volume opportunities.

Why wasn't that sufficient to retain this volume? Thank you.

I'll pass it over after that.

Yeah. What I might do if you look at the volumes probably down 2.8%, and I might unpack some of that to give you maybe some insight as a once-off insight at year-end.

If you look at our total volume, off about 2. 2.8%, within that, there was directionally about 1% to 1.5% sort of share gain that translated into 1.5% volume.

We also had some restocking in certain regions that probably added about another 1% to 1.5%. Then on the minus side, we had some customer events where customers were managing their inventory, taking some capacity down in the short term.

That was about a decline of about 1.5%. We mentioned a startup of a fairly large capital project we had in the region, that and maybe some furnace repairs we had during the year, that was about 1%.

When you net that off, that nets to about 2.5%, but within that, we had, we think somewhere in the region of about a 1.5% of growth in volume and that was high quality, high EP growth. We are seeing growth start to come through, but it is being offset by other events in the market.

To build on that, what I would say is we really wanted to take a very disciplined approach in the marketplace. Given the challenges in the macro environment, we held the top line steady, which was exactly what we wanted to achieve.

You look at that, hey, net price was basically kind of flat in the marketplace, volumes were down a couple percent, given the context of the market, we think that that is good disciplined in execution. Really the concept of growing, notwithstanding the mix management and everything that's going on right now, is really kind of our Horizon 2 effort that we're working on.

We're building the system for that right now, and we're finding those pockets of growth as Gordon alluded to in the commentary. We're starting to execute on them.

Some of them take time to be able to translate into actually demonstrated volumes and things like that, but we're working on things like design and innovation, leveraging our industry-high Net Promoter Score with our customers to find those opportunities for growth. We're just starting that journey to start to leverage Fit to Win as we go forward.

Yeah. Just to build on that, Kyle, I think we mentioned in our Investor Day and subsequent calls that we really had mapped all of the categories and segments across all the markets in which we compete.

We now have a very, very clear view on where the pockets of growth are, where we have a right to win, and we are now adjusting or revamping our go-to-market model across all of our sales force in all of the markets. That's just starting to hit and be rolled out.

We're having some wins on that. To give you an example, with a regional beer customer where our expected growth would be, somewhere in the high to mid or mid to high single digits this year.

We're seeing other spirits customers in certain regions where we would expect again high to mid single-digit growth this year. It's starting to come through, but really it will be towards the back half of the year and probably the last quarter of the year before we see that gain real momentum and then into 2027.

As we look ahead for the year, we have the World Cup coming up where we would start to see inventories building kind of late April into May. We've got the 250-year celebration here in the US.

We think that's going to have a kind of a positive impact. We see it starting to build.

We spent the first kind of 15, 18 months on the back end of the business and getting TOE right. Now there's a huge focus on getting the go-to-market piece of the business right so we can execute on where we see these pockets of growth.

Thank you.

Thanks, Kyle.

Hi, good morning. It's Anojja Shah sitting in for Josh.

I wanted to ask about the $750, the new cost savings target. Not to take away from how impressive this performance has been, but you basically raised the cost savings target by $100 million, but kept the 2027 EBITDA the same.

I assume that that means that maybe your volumes are going to continue to offset, but is there anything else in there? Can you reconcile that for us?

Yeah. This is John.

I can touch base on that. Yes, the end target of at least 1450 remains in place, right?

We're not limiting ourselves to 1450, at least 1450. We have increased Fit to Win by $100 million.

That does help mitigate the uncertainty around the commercial environment. Of course, we are working to drive and improve commercial outlook for the business, just back to the last discussion.

We are building the system to be able to grow. As we always said, it's going to be a little bit more of a Horizon 2, a target to drive the top-line growth.

We are making some room given the uncertainty and the continued prolonged affordability challenges out there in the marketplace.

Thank you for that. Then in the past, you talked about working with customers and I guess the whole supply chain to get better as an industry at forecasting demand.

I think you had said that you were only about at a 50% success rate a while ago. Can you give us an update on that and maybe where you are now and any financial benefits you're seeing from that?

Sure. [coughs] So when we kind of began the journey, it was running at about 50%.

I am glad to report that as we move through 2025, that's jumped to about 68%, 69%. With many of our customers, at the most senior level, we've had discussions about the need to improve the supply chain efficiency.

If I compare it to other industries, I think there's a big opportunity for ourselves working with customers and suppliers to strip out waste and inefficiency in the value chain, and that's what we're focused on. I think when we last spoke, our new chief supply officer hadn't started.

He has now begun, and that's a key focus for him and his team is how do we strip cost and waste out of the supply chain and then share that with customers and suppliers with a view to growing volumes in the different categories. We've made good progress, still a lot of work to go, and still a lot of opportunity to take out over the next 18, 24 months, Anojja.

Great. Thank you.

I'll turn it over.

Thank you, Gordon, John, Chris, and team for taking my questions. Congrats on all the progress.

Thanks.

Thanks,

Mike. Thanks, Mike.

Just wanted to follow up with you, Gordon, on some really interesting color in terms of mentioning where the pockets of growth are, where you have a right to win, and then you mentioned revamping the go-to-market model. What are you doing differently and what are you trying to encourage the sales force to do differently to drive better volumes?

As you think about your portfolio, I know it sounds like you had a beer win, maybe some spirits wins as well that are going to hit later this year. As you think about your portfolio, are you looking to reorient maybe toward more growth markets like food, NABs, RTDs, maybe minimize beer, and maybe minimize spirits, particularly given the elevated inventories that that category has experienced?

I'll take the second piece first, Mike. Yes is the short answer in terms of reorienting the portfolio to higher growth and higher margin segments, such as non-alcoholic beverages, premium non-alcoholic beer, waters, juices, where we're seeing significant growth opportunities, particularly in the Americas on that.

Food is growing particularly in the southern half of Europe and in markets like Brazil and Mexico and indeed here in North America. That's very much part of a focus strategy, and we're starting to see results come through.

With regard to the go-to-market model, I probably would have viewed the organization of the sales forces in the different markets to be somewhat traditional and probably hadn't changed over a period of 10 to 15 years. We're bringing in much better sort of insights, sharing those insights with the sales force and bringing kind of modern methods of sales management into the business.

Equipping then our sales force with insights and opportunities by customer on how the customer can either improve their growth or improve their cost or both. Then a much more rigorous system of review and accountability building from daily sales to weekly sales to monthly against targets and a much tighter account management.

Now in many industries, this is old hat, but this will be a big step forward for us in how we drive focus on performance. We have some fantastic insights and data in the business.

It's now how do we turn those into opportunities for our customers. We're already starting to see green shoots coming through in that system.

It's early days in embedding it. We should be well under way by end of the second quarter, and that system should be in place across all the markets and functioning accordingly.

We're also upgrading some of the commercial leadership in different markets and bringing kind of better and best practices into the business. That's a bit of flavor on that, Mike, happy to elaborate on any of that.

No, that's very helpful. Would it be fair to say that the changes you're pursuing are going to lead you to that volume growth that you're targeting for 2028 and beyond, the 1% that you outlined at I-Day, right?

Sounds like you're getting an earlier jump on doing these things, particularly given that there's been a pull forward of the Fit to Win benefits such that you're starting to move forward at a faster pace on commercialization and trying to streamline the organization and bring in business wins. Is that a fair assessment?

Correct. That's a fair assumption.

Just to add a bit of color to that, the first area of focus really was on the supply chain and strengthening the supply chain and getting the costs down. That's what really we've been focused on over the last 18 months.

As we've made sort of faster progress than expected, that allows us to orient more focus to the front end of the business. It's very difficult to make moves on the back end and the front end at the same time.

That risks all sorts of supply chain snafus and customer issues, and we were very deliberate in staging how we would do this. We got the back end in order or in much better order.

There's still a lot of opportunity there for us, and we did that faster than planned, and that allowed us then to switch the focus to the front end of the business, probably maybe six to nine months ahead of what we might have thought in the early days. Really it is a sequencing thing that allowed us to go faster as we made faster progress on the back end.

Got it. Very helpful.

Thanks very much, and good luck in '26.

All right. Thanks, Mike.

Great. Thanks for taking my question.

Hope you guys are well. I guess first off, just wanted to understand how the volume trajectory would progress through '26.

I think last year in the first half, you were up 2% to 4%, and then now you do face those tougher comps, and then the back half of '25, you were down. Should we expect kind of reversal of those trends in '26?

If so, given that you would be exiting maybe at a positive rate, do you expect that positive volume growth to continue in '27? Thanks.

Arun, thanks for the question. John here.

You're basically spot on. The first quarter, as we had indicated, is going to be our toughest comp period.

Our volumes were up between 4% and 5% last year. We believe that was substantially due to tariff pre-buying.

Kind of we work off of that tougher comp, so that's where we said we're going to be down mid maybe even high single digits depending on the consumer. We transition in the second quarter to something that's closer to flat, and then in the back half of the year, you're looking at low to mid single-digit type of growth numbers against obviously easier comps that we had over the next year.

Yes, I think that this develops into a bit of commercial momentum, and so we're looking to continue to try to improve the top line. Obviously, a little bit of help from the consumer will be good, and there's macros that need to be addressed in the affordability side.

As we work through that on our macro basis, that could result in a tailwind down the road as markets recover, and we get this engine that Gordon was talking about also fine-tuned.

Great. Thanks for that, John.

Then the free cash flow, I think the guidance is somewhat in line with our expectations. Any opportunities there for upside?

I guess maybe it could come from maybe net price not being as negative. I don't know if that's one opportunity, but or working capital kind of harvesting a little bit more.

Any opportunities there where you could see upside to that free cash flow need or, how do you feel about the level of guidance for '26? Thanks.

Yeah. Clearly the biggest lever is going to be on the EBITDA side.

If we can perform on the top end of the range and get some of that higher-end improved cost performance, obviously we have $275 million, we're always aiming for more, right, as we've delivered in the past, we're always aiming for more. There's continued opportunities to work there.

I would also profile, as you mentioned, working capital. We do have efforts to continue to reduce inventory this next year.

We have made a provision for additional receivables towards the end of the year as we're talking about the growth, but we're also working on, for example, non-finished good inventories, other things below the line that could generate additional cash. I think those are your biggest variables, and we continue to work on the balance sheet and we'll probably have another year of refinancing going on, we'll look for opportunities to improve the P&L and cash management there.

Thanks

a lot. One other thing, you asked about net price.

I do think price is probably less the moving piece on the gross price, but inflation, if inflation continues to trend off, that might be an upside, but I think that's a little early to determine.

Thanks.

Good morning. This is Bryan Burgmeier on for Anthony.

Thanks for taking the question. Maybe just kind of following up on Arun's question, just considering the 1Q outlook, do you anticipate any curtailments kind of continuing into 1Q or 2Q, or do you think those curtailments, if they are going to be there, would kind of taper off throughout the year, considering your footprint actions are going to be I think wrapped up by midyear this year?

Any detail on kind of the curtailment or operating rate would be helpful.

Let me step back and talk about capacity management. As you recall, back in 2024, we had about 13% of underutilized capacity, and that's what drove our program to eliminate the capacity which we've been working on.

That 13% in 2024 dropped to about 6% in 2000 and 25, primarily as we made progress on the Americas. It took us a little bit longer in Europe given complying with labor regulations.

We expect that 6% to drop in 2026 as we complete that activity over in Europe, so that 6% maybe goes down to about 3% or so. We also have efforts to kind of reduce some inventories, as I mentioned, and that also that extra downtime actually provides some swing capacity for us, which is pretty important, so as markets recover that you have the opportunity to take advantage on the upside.

We might be carrying a little bit of downtime, but we're getting into the short strokes there.

Got it. No, thanks for that detail.

That makes a lot of sense. Then last question for me, you mentioned the pre-buy impact from tariffs.

Maybe just as we start to get closer to kind of lapping Liberation Day, are you seeing kind of stability or maybe even potentially a modest recovery in some of those impacted markets? I guess there's maybe still not the full clarity some customers are looking for, but not sure if it's been stabilizing throughout the year.

Thanks. I'll turn it over.

I I think we are seeing some stabilization, and certainly it's it's there's more certainty here than than a year ago. Then we're we're seeing other sort of geopolitical moves, with we'll say, the UK, which is a an important source market obviously for Scotch, opening up, agreements with India and and with China.

Depending on how quickly they come to come to action, then that that's that creates sort of opportunities for for the Scotch industry to export more to India and China, and that obviously, then has an impact on on us. Same thing with French spirits, in into China, particularly Cognac and the higher-end wines and things like champagne.

Those those those things help for sure. They weren't on the radar this time last year.

They are now. At least we, we're working with, the certainty of the system that's there at the moment.

I I think the big challenge in in the US market is is to increase, consumer offtake and and to drive down the inventories that are that are in the system. We are seeing, customers make moves to, change in in marketing strategies, and increasing their spend behind that, increasing promotions, to to drive that.

I I I would say the outlook is is certainly more stable and and I would say probably more positive than than it was this year with last year with all the uncertainty. Thank you.

Hi. Good morning.

Most of the questions have been answered, but I have two. First one is if you could give a little bit more detail on the European market supply and demand dynamics.

You commented that mainly so far the cuts in supply will be in Europe. How do you expect the volume to perform there?

Yeah. Happy to do that, Ruiz.

Let me stand back. In the Americas, we see capacity probably tighter and more aligned with demand and less sort of price pressure, I would say in general across the markets.

There are some pockets where that doesn't hold, but in general, I think capacity and demand is pretty tightly matched in the Americas. With regard to Europe, there certainly is more spare capacity.

We've obviously taken down what we feel is surplus to us. There has been some other capacity taken out across the markets.

If you look at categories like wine in France and Spain, there's still significant overcapacity and there is price pressure in those categories in those markets. Also, in sort of mainstream lower-equity kind of beer where we're seeing some capacity come on.

It certainly has tightened up significantly year on year. Okay?

I would say, pricing has firmed up, whereas last year you're probably looking at a such situation of more overcapacity and therefore more pressure on pricing. Again, I would see the situation has improved year on year.

Obviously, our focus is on what we control, and we're taking the actions we've outlined which should all be completed at the latest by the half year. That would make our network pretty tight.

I would add, if you take a look at the trajectory of kind of net price performance, 2024 was a kind of a reset year. 2025 was significantly better, and then we expect 2026 to be better than 2025, even though we're seeing a little bit of still net price pressure.

It's gradually getting better and normalizing.

Yeah. You see the significant uplift in Americas in 2025 and not so much in the EU, and that really is just a factor of timing.

You can get to take actions in the Americas at a much swifter rate than in Europe, as you well know. We've worked through that process diligently and in a disciplined manner, and we're well down the path to executing on the kind of actions that drove the uplift in the Americas.

We'll see those coming through now in Europe in 2026.

Okay. Thank you very much.

My second question is from one of the drivers that you commented on your Capital Market Day, which is the move from can to glass, which mainly you highlighted this on a better improvement of your profitability. Now given the high cost of the raw material of the aluminium, it's making this way alone.

No, there are more opportunities for beer companies to move that way. Are you seeing this driver already this year, or is something that is still pending to be seen?

Look, certainly in the categories in which we operate, we've seen a very big slowdown, particularly in North America, of that switch. If I take a look at the price gap, which I think we outlined at about 35% at I-Day, that is certainly, with the movement in aluminium on paper anyway, to 10%, 12% mark.

Historically, when it's been around that level, you see a shift over time from cans to glass, right? However, we're still focused on driving our own internal opportunities to reduce costs, and we're not going to stop there.

Yes, absolutely, it helps. Where there is can growth in Europe, but it tends to be in the categories where glass isn't either not highly represented or it's not fit for purpose for a specific channel, right?

There's growth in kind of CSDs and particularly energy drinks, which is nearly exclusively can. A lot of those consumption moments are in areas where you can't use glass, like concerts and beaches and stuff like that.

In terms of cost gap to cans in Europe, we're in a very good position as well. Let's see what plays out this year in terms of glass to cans.

Again, certainly in a much better position than we were this time last year in that regard.

Okay. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Hey, good morning, guys. I'm standing in for Gabe Hajde today.

Most of my questions have been answered, but I did want to ask, inventory was up, looks like $20 million quarter over quarter. We normally would have expected it to be down by about that much, call it about a $40-$50 million delta there.

Were you actually tracking ahead of your free cash flow guidance earlier in the quarter? It seems like maybe the surprise with some of the volume in the Americas might have been to blame there.

Then I guess if so, does this set you up a little better to start 2026 since maybe some of the inventory build into Q1 is already done?

One thing I would say is when you take a look at those balance sheet numbers, there is a hell of a lot of FX flushing through there, okay? On an FX-neutral basis, we were able to reduce inventory some last year.

Now keep in mind, we did not achieve the IDS targets we were hoping to at the end of the year. We ended in 2024 at 57 IDS.

We were hoping to get that down to 50. We did not get there because of the softness in the back half of the year.

To your point, that does set us up for continued progress to be made this next year in 2026. Yes, we are anticipating and included in our guidance right now is us getting that 50 days of IDS plus additional progress on non-finished good inventories, things like raw materials and machine parts and spare parts and things like that, that also can contribute some upside opportunities to cash as we go forward.

Understood. That's helpful.

Then, John, also your quarterly cadence guidance is reflecting pretty well-balanced H1 versus H2. I think based on some of the volume comments you've made, I would have been surprised, and also based on some of your peer commentary about most are expecting a stronger back half.

Maybe can you help us reconcile some of that? Then also, where is the World Cup contemplated in this, or is that just representing potential upside?

I think it's more of a potential upside. There's a lot of variables out there, obviously.

If we're talking about flat to slightly down volumes, there's not a lot of those event-specific things considered into the guidance right now. As we take a look at the reconciliations and things like that, obviously some of this has to do with prior year comps and where we were earnings-wise in the prior year.

We also are looking at the cadence of Fit to Win. Obviously, we got a lot of activities here in the first half of the year, especially with Europe, that will start to track into the second quarter.

Again, if there is upsides in the markets and they recover, then that probably, as I mentioned, is not comprehended in the outlook that we have right now. We're trying to be practical on our outlook right now, and that includes the sales volumes at flat to down.

Got it. Thanks, guys, and best of luck in Q1.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thanks, Lucy. That concludes our earnings call.

Please note that our first quarter call is currently scheduled for Wednesday, April 29th. Remember, make it a memorable moment by choosing safe, sustainable glass.

Thank you.