Thank you. Good afternoon, everyone, and warm welcome to Q3 FY '26 earnings call for Capri Global Capital Limited.

This is Hardik Doshi, Head, Corporate Finance and Investor Relations. Before we begin, as a brief disclaimer, the discussion on today's call regarding Capri Global Capital Limited's earnings performance is based on judgments derived from the declared results and information on business opportunities available to the company at this time.

The company's performance is subject to risk, uncertainties, and assumptions that could cause results to differ materially in future. In that context, participants on today's call are advised to consider the same while interpreting the results.

The full disclaimer is available on slide 63 of the earnings presentation. Participants are requested to kindly take note of the same.

Format of the today's call would be opening remarks by the management team, followed by Q&A. Let me now introduce the management team for the Capri Global Capital present on the call today.

With us today, we have Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Managing Director and Promoter; Ms.

Divya Surler, Executive Director, Strategy; Mr. Kishore Lodha, Chief Financial Officer; and Mr.

Sanjeev Srivastava, Chief Risk Officer. I would now request our Managing Director, Mr.

Rajesh Sharma, to present his opening remarks on the results. Over to you, sir.

Thank you. Good afternoon, everyone.

I hope you all are doing well and had a good New Year break. We announced our unaudited financial results for the third quarter of FY 2026 on 29th January.

I trust you have had the opportunity to go through our earnings presentation, which is also available on our website. Before I move on to the financial and operational highlights, I would like to touch upon the broader operating environment during the quarter.

India's economy continues to demonstrate resilience amid a mixed and uncertain global backdrop. Domestic demand remains steady, financial conditions and government schemes are supportive, and budgetary push for infrastructure spending, indigenous manufacturing, and service sector will drive the consumption and credit growth.

India is expected to be amongst the fastest-growing major economies in FY '26, underpinned by a stable inflation trajectory and strong structural fundamentals. At the same time, the macro environment continues to be affected by external headwinds, including geopolitical issues, global market volatility, and currency movements, underscoring the need for disciplined execution and prudent risk management for financial institutions.

Against this backdrop, I'm pleased to say that Capri Global delivered strong quarterly performance in Q3 FY '26, continuing its growth momentum and maintaining asset quality while delivering highest-ever quarterly profit of ₹255 crore, a 99% increase year-on-year. This performance reflects our strong execution capability and resilient business model even during the uncertain macro conditions.

Now coming to our detailed business and earnings performance during the quarter. The strong momentum we saw in the first half of FY '26 continued through the third quarter across all our lending businesses.

As of December 31st, 2025, our consolidated AUM stood at ₹30,406 crore, reflecting a robust 47% year-on-year growth and 12% quarter-on-quarter growth. This performance was underpinned by broad-based expansion across segments.

Gold loan grew an impressive 80% year-on-year while housing loan rose 40% year-on-year. Our co-lending AUM surged 93% year-on-year to ₹7,138 crore, now accounting for almost 23.5% of total AUM, up from 21% in Q2 FY '26, highlighting our strategic focus on capital-efficient growth.

Disbursements for the quarter rose 87% year-on-year to ₹10,879 crore, supported by a widening distribution network and growing customer base. Our growth remains granular, diversified, and retail-led, with our customer base now exceeding 6.3 lakhs, reaffirming the scalability and resilience of our business model.

For our gold loan business, we delivered a strong and well-balanced performance in line with our strategic objective of growth driven by branch expansion while maintaining focus on effective risk management. We successfully met our branch expansion target with the net addition of 68 new branches across South India.

While last quarter we focused on deepening our presence in existing geographies, this quarter we marked our entry in high-potential new geographies of Odisha, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and Karnataka to support the next phase of growth. Gold loan AUM saw robust growth, increasing from ₹10,170 crore at the end of September to ₹12,555 crore by December, a sequential increase of 23%, led by healthy customer demand and improving branch productivity.

In the context of rising gold prices, we maintained conservative loan-to-value ratios while ensuring strong collection practices across the portfolio. Asset quality remained a key focus.

Our gold loan gross NPA stood at 0.39% as of December, underscoring our focus on risk management and portfolio quality even amid rapid growth. Overall, Q3 marked an all-round performance for the gold loan business, combining scale alongside strong credit discipline and operational execution, with branch productivity increasing to ₹14.1 crore AUM per branch.

Our MSME AUM grew to ₹5,886 crore, up by 19% year-on-year, supported by steady execution and network expansion. In the MSME business, all 16 branches in Uttar Pradesh we opened in Q2 FY '26 are now fully operational, and by December end, these branches have achieved monthly disbursement run rate of ₹9.5 crore, and we expect this to cross ₹20 crore per month by March.

During the quarter, we also commenced MSME operations in prime urban markets such as Mumbai, Pune, and Delhi, which will help diversify and strengthen our overall customer risk profile. Within MSME, our Micro LAP business continues to gain strong traction, with AUM rising to ₹650 crore.

This vertical enables us to serve emerging self-employed borrowers with smaller ticket size requirement. In Micro LAP, we added 14 branches during Q3, taking the total branch network to 151 branches as of December end.

Our immediate focus now in this segment will be on improving sales productivity and operating efficiency across the expanded network before undertaking the next phase of branch expansion. Housing AUM stood at ₹6,490 crore, delivering a year-on-year growth of 40%.

We continue to see resilient demand across the affordable housing segment, where rising income level and lower interest rate regime are driving demand for housing loans. With net addition of 18 branches, we further expanded our presence in high-potential South India market by entering state of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka.

This strategic expansion is a step towards becoming a national player in housing finance, increasing portfolio granularity and support yield expansion over time. Our construction finance AUM saw steady growth of 37% year-on-year to ₹5,109 crore, now funding over 279 active residential projects, with an average ticket size of ₹37 crore sanction-wise and outstanding portfolio ticket size of ₹18 crore.

The book remains granular and well-diversified by geography, reflecting our focus on working with mid-size and small developers in metro and tier 1 cities. We continue to emphasize disciplined underwriting through rigorous due diligence and escrow-based cash flow management, ensuring a risk-first approach.

Our total branch network expanded to 1,331 locations in Q3 FY '26, with a new addition of 107 branches during the quarter, while our employee base increased to 13,066, up by 7% quarter-on-quarter. Our entry in new geographies is a step towards our ambition of building a pan-India footprint, enhance customer reach, and increase brand visibility, laying the foundation for the next phase of growth.

Let me now provide an update on our core earnings. Our yields and spread on net advances remained healthy in the quarter at 16.4% and 7% respectively, driven by continued loan book expansion, decline in cost of funds, and enhanced margin.

Our net interest income for Q3 FY '26 stood at ₹510 crore, representing a strong 48% increase year-on-year. We continue to strengthen our non-interest income stream in Q3 FY '26, reinforcing our strategy of building a diversified and resilient earning profile.

Non-interest income grew 124% year-on-year and 18% quarter-on-quarter to ₹240 crore, contributing 32% of net total income for the quarter. This strong increase was largely driven by growth in commission of insurance distribution and co-lending fee income.

In our insurance distribution business, we generated fee income of ₹34 crore during the quarter. Q3 marked an important strategic milestone with the deployment of the upgraded CapriCare insurance ecosystem.

During the quarter, we unveiled a refreshed brand identity and fully digital end-to-end platform that enables instant real-time policy issuance, significantly easing insurance adoption across our retail customer base. More importantly, we expanded our product portfolio beyond traditional financial indemnity products to a holistic wellness-led offering.

By embedding preventive health care solutions such as annual health screening and cashless consultation into the ecosystem, CapriCare is evolving from a claims-driven product offering into a proactive health and protection partner for our customers. This digital-first and integrated approach is expected to drive higher insurance penetration, improve customer engagement, and meaningfully enhance fee income contribution over time.

Our co-lending income stood at ₹116 crore, driven by higher disbursal volumes and deeper engagement with partner banks. This capital-efficient model continues to enhance ROE, diversify funding sources, and scale fee-led income without incremental balance sheet strain.

Our car loan distribution business maintained its steady momentum with origination of ₹3,290 crore in Q3 FY '26, up 15% year-on-year. With a growing footprint and deep relationship across 14 partner banks and institutions, we have built a scalable platform with pan-India network in this segment with potential to monetize further for distribution of other products.

On the expenses front, our operating expenses increased 15% quarter-on-quarter. This was mainly driven by increase in the employee cost on account of net addition of 869 employees quarter-on-quarter and increase in employee incentive linked with higher disbursements.

Our continued focus on operating efficiency is visible, with the cost-to-income ratio improving 51.6% in Q3 FY '26 compared with 58.2% in Q3 FY '25. This sharp improvement underscores the benefit of a maturing branch network, rising productivity, and strong operating leverage across our businesses.

As a result of margin expansion, improvement in operating efficiency, and strong traction in fee income, our pre-provision operating profit surged 92% year-on-year to ₹363 crore for the quarter. Further, we continued our strong profitability momentum in Q3 FY '26, delivering a robust PAT of ₹255 crore, up 99% year-on-year.

Our return ratios considerably improved during the quarter, with ROE of 15% and ROA of 4% for the quarter. Coming to our asset quality, our impairment costs for the quarter stood at ₹23 crore in Q3 FY '26, down from ₹31 crore in Q2 FY '26 or 0.4% of the gross loan book, and our provision coverage ratio on stage 3 loans improved to 43.6%, demonstrating our prudent provisioning and conservative approach to risk management.

Our stage 2 assets increased by ₹95 crore quarter-on-quarter and were 4% of gross loans. However, our stage 3 ratios improved quarter-on-quarter for gold loan, housing loan, and construction finance, and remained flat for MSME loan.

At consolidated level, our stage 3 assets remained flat at ₹275 crore quarter-on-quarter, resulting in our gross stage 3 ratio at 1.2%, down sequentially by 10 basis points, while net stage 3 ratio stood at 0.7%, down 7 bps sequentially. Let me talk about liability side.

Our borrowings increased by 38% year-on-year, and incremental borrowings sanction limit year-to-date this fiscal was around ₹6,860 crore. We added 11 new lender relationships year-to-date, taking the active relationships now to 30-plus.

We also continue to diversify our borrowing mix by raising funds through other instruments such as NCDs and commercial papers. During the quarter, we raised ₹635 crore from NCDs and commercial paper.

As a result of MCLR reduction and our effective efforts on repricing existing liabilities, we are happy to share that we saw quarter-on-quarter reduction of 24 basis points in our cost of funds. Following equity capital infusion of ₹2,000 crore in Q1 FY '26, our balance sheet is now significantly stronger, with the low leverage ratio of 2.8x, providing ample headroom to support accelerated growth across businesses.

Our standalone capital adequacy ratio of CGCL is at 30.3% and 24.8% for Capri Global Housing Finance Limited. Our liquidity remains comfortable, with over ₹4,274 crore in cash and bank balances, investments, and undrawn credit lines across CGCL and CGHFL.

Our technology investments continue to deliver tangible outcomes, and to understand the sustainability of these numbers, we need to look at the engine powering them. Four years ago, we began rebuilding Capri as a platform-centric NBFC, and that decision is now generating exponential operating leverage.

Our performance is not just the outcome of incremental manpower; it is also the product of scaling our systems. Our in-house technology stack delivers higher disbursement, sharper credit selection, and shorter cycle times, all without a proportional rise in cost.

Our disbursements are up 87% year-on-year. However, manpower has increased by just 19% year-on-year, driven largely by the addition of 265 new branches year-on-year rather than rise in core operating load.

This is the compounding effect of AI-native operating model, one where productivity, speed, and the risk discipline accelerate together, and where growth is driven by architecture, not headcount. We have built an AI-first lending platform from the ground up and embedded at the core of our credit architecture made around the critical element of clean, governed, continuously enriched data.

The customer journey runs on a fully native, seamless flow from digital onboarding through our mobility app called SPARK into a centralized loan origination system called ORION that orchestrates complex workflows end-to-end. This foundation delivers insight, speed, and risk precision that legacy vendor-led ecosystem cannot match.

This distinction is most visible in our proprietary intelligence models: SENTINEL for credit and KRONOS for collections. Credit model acts as a vigilant guard, moving us from static scorecards to dynamic risk compliance, while collections model drives time-driven escalation aligned to delinquency aging.

Our agentic communication stack across voice, WhatsApp, SMS, and GenAI bots now manages customer engagement end-to-end. It sends nudges automatically, analyzes call transcripts, detects early risk signals, and triggers the right action instantly, creating a real-time, high-accuracy feedback loop across the collections funnel.

On ground, our field collection executive operates on a specialized geotagged mobility app called PEGASUS, ensuring fast-moving, wide-coverage execution by optimizing routes and tracking visits in real time. This structurally lowers the cost of collections and improves cure rates without expanding our feet-on-street workforce.

Underpinning this capability is a robust hybrid multi-cloud strategy and unified data foundation that feeds our real-time executive dashboards called ZEUS, ensuring that decisions regarding funnel visibility and asset quality are backed by live data. We have modernized the entire application development lifecycle by embedding artificial intelligence at every stage, driving an 83% year-on-year improvement in employee-to-PR-code productivity.

With AI-driven automated reviews and agentic testing framework, we have brought our error rate down to below 5%, supported by 4x increase in code coverage year-on-year. As a result, we are delivering new features faster with higher reliability and with leaner teams, giving us a sustained execution advantage.

This velocity translates directly into business outcomes and customer experience. Consequently, products like gold loan have turnaround time of less than 30 minutes, and our pre-approved top-up loans are disbursed in 60 seconds.

We are monetizing trust and leveraging the India Stack to acquire and verify customers with very low cost. Importantly, we have ensured that speed does not come at the expense of governance and is aligned with regulatory guidelines.

The technology foundation is in place, the systems are mature and are built to compound earnings at scale. On the ESG front, I am pleased to share that our ESG practices have been recognized by leading global independent rating agencies, including S&P Global and Morningstar Sustainalytics.

Capri Global has achieved an S&P ESG score of 71, the highest among all NBFC peers, and has been assessed as low ESG risk by Morningstar Sustainalytics. These ratings place us firmly among the leaders in ESG practices within the NBFC sector and reflect our adherence to globally benchmarked standards.

Importantly, these assessments are based entirely on publicly available, independently verified data, underscoring the strength, transparency, and resilience of our governance and operating model. We shall now be happy to take your questions.

Hi, thank you for the opportunity. Am I audible?

Yes, please.

Hello. Hi, sir.

My first question is with our ongoing investments in distribution, how should we think of benchmarks like AUM per branch, per employee that signal the transition from buildout to operating leverage in gold and Micro LAP businesses?

Yes, thank you. As far as the AUM per branch is concerned, gold loan, as we have narrated in our call also, that it has already crossed ₹14.1 crore per branch AUM, and we expect this gold loan AUM continue to grow.

There are many branches which are still less than ₹10 crore while the average is ₹14, where some of the branches are about ₹25, some of the branches are below ₹10. There existed good scope that these branches will continue to deliver 30%-plus growth.

Plus, we intend to add more branches. Currently, if you talk about 910 branches, there are about 20% branches are more than ₹20 crore per branch, between ₹5 crore to 20% branches almost there are about 67% branches, and there are some newly opened branches we opened in the last two quarters less than ₹5 crore.

Those branches will continue to grow, plus we also intend to add the new branches. The existing branches will also continue to grow with the addition of the opening of the new branches.

Per-branch AUM, we can expect we are at 14.1, and these existing branches will continue to grow for 30%, and then there'll be addition of the new branches. If we talk about Micro LAP, which we are operating about 151 branches currently, the AUM is about ₹650 crore, which is average roughly about close to ₹5 crore-plus.

These branches will deliver a AUM about, say, ₹10 crore by the next year, and we intend to achieve a ₹3,000 crore of AUM in about another 2.5 years from now. That is the trajectory they are following.

Sir. Thanks for that.

It was very helpful. Second question is in line with our portfolio mix.

As we are seeing a shift from traditional lending towards gold loans and co-lending, but our NIMs have remained largely unchanged. What's our outlook there on gold loan yields?

Gold loan yields are currently in the range of about 17.8%, and overall, if you talk about the overall yield of the company, it is about 16.4% at the portfolio level. With the increase slightly in the gold loan portfolio, the overall yield and spread will improve.

Plus, Micro LAP segment is also increasing where the yield is also going to be supportive. We expect the gold loan to remain in the range of about 18%, slightly there would be improvement about 20, 25 basis going forward by various gold loan focus we are bringing it now increasing the smaller branches, there we should see some improvement in our yield, plus certain other measures we are taking.

Overall gold yield is likely to be 18%, and our overall yield of the company, which is 16.4%, should improve slightly. It should improve by 10 to 20 basis in next year.

Sir. Thank you so much.

Good afternoon, everyone, and very good congratulations for the good performance in this quarter. I had a couple of questions to ask.

Basically, we have seen co-lending has been scaling faster from 20% to 23.5% in Q3. How do we see the shape-up going ahead?

Is this going to keep increasing further on?

I think co-lending will remain largely in the current range of between 20 to 23%. We do not intend to grow it further from this level, and if we are able to maintain, this is a very good level to have it.

It is very, very highly ROE accretive, and there is a focus of regulator as well as the banks to partner in the co-lending so that it is a collaboration between the low-cost fund and the low-cost collection efficiency of NBFC and low-cost fund of the banks. We intend to maintain this level.

Got it, sir. One more question I had regarding the gold price itself has gone up significantly in the last few quarters, and right now, they reached at its peak.

If we see further downside in gold prices, what kind of scenarios have we embedded for your loss and provisioning? Have we done for that?

I think it's a very good question in the recent times of the recent volatility of the gold loan, but as a company, we follow the very conservative practice in terms of the way we decide the LTV. In the rising trend of the gold, we reduce our LTV, during the January whatever we disbursed, our loan disbursement were happening at the LTV about 64% against the 75% permitted.

The portfolio level, our LTV is at 60% overall. It means we have a portfolio level 40% margin in the current trend.

Second thing is that the moment we also have a system that early warning triggers we are able to send to the customer through SMS and WhatsApp messages in case anybody's LTV breaches. At individual level, where the loan amount is anything between ₹50,000 to ₹2 lakh, if the gold prices have fallen and the margin call trigger, we send the message, and we manage the dynamic collateral monitoring where we monitors the portfolio and individual loan accounts system-wise, and take the prompt corrective action.

Borrowers are required to restore the margin within 14 days of intimation, limiting prolonged exposure during period of price correction. Then we retain the right through our agreement to initiate action of pledge gold, including prior loan maturity if collateral coverage becomes inadequate or borrower risk increases materially.

There are various safeguards in-built. If we talk about currently, as I said, in the January month, our all disbursements, we have disbursed the loan where the AUM was only 60 64%.

So 36% the margin we were maintained during the time when the gold was going up one way. Between December and January, we were maintaining our fresh disbursement LTV not 75, but between 70% to 72%.

There also we have taken a conservative approach. Also, the gold loan lending happening on the 30-day last 30 days average price.

Accordingly, rate per gram is decided. Basis all these frameworks, we are at quite comfortable position where the LTV is just 60% at a portfolio level.

Got it, sir. I think the book has been very well-managed.

Thank you, sir. This has been very helpful.

Sir, congratulations on your superb set of numbers. The company has shown really good growth.

If you can just throw some light on what was the reason for decline in the overall net interest margin to 9.1%? Also the company has said that the overall spread could reach to 7.2% going forward.

Does the company stay with the same guidance for spreads as well?

I think what is the relevant indicator to track is a spread, and our spread have not come down. Spread has improved from 6.9 to 7%, there is improvement in the spread and our margin.

As regard net interest margin concerned, the more you leverage, net interest margin will fall. I think right indicator is spread where we are showing improvement of 10 basis from 6.9

to 7%. Sir.

You have guided for 7.2%, I remember, in the second quarter. Do you stay with the guidance of 7.2%?

Will we see more 20 basis point improvement in spread in the fourth quarter?

Yes, there will be improvement in the fourth quarter in the spread further. On the back of our AUM of the gold loan rising, some support will come from the scale benefit and also from the cost of fund is going down.

Already we reduced about 24 basis in cost of fund down. In the last quarter, some of the loans will get further reset, and the mix of borrowing of the short-term commercial paper and other measures, our overall spread will continue to improve, and I think we given a guidance of 7.2, which we hope to deliver that.

Sir. Sir, one last question I just wanted to understand on your gold loan branches because I remember you saying 995 branches was a target for FY '26.

What would be the addition for gold loan branches in FY '27? I think so are there approval that the company needs for additional branches?

What's the update on that, sir?

I think the branches which we'll add in the last quarter of the gold loan, we'll let them stabilize and achieve at least six months time. We'll approach the RBI at appropriate time, and RBI give their approval and decision within 45 days.

In the second half of FY '27, we'll announce the expansion of our gold loan branches based on what time we approach and subject to our approval and program. Accordingly, we'll announce at right time how many branches will be adding in the second half.

Okay. Thank you, sir.

Thank you for answering the questions. Once again, congratulations on your superb set of numbers.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Hi, sir. Good afternoon.

My first question was for gold loan segment that we have already observed a sharp decline in yields. What was the primary reason?

Was it because of higher competition? I couldn't hear properly, could you reiterate means what is the expansion we are seeing in the yields of gold loan?

As far as expansion is concerned, by current quarter, we will ending up 999 branches of the gold loan. Last quarter, you've seen we added about 68 branches in the gold alone.

As far as the yield is concerned, the decline in the yield in Q3 FY '26 compared to Q2 FY '26 is directly linked to our strategy of expanding the retail loan book with a particular focus on smaller ticket size loan in rural markets. This shift has been effective in driving customer acquisition and enhancing market reach, but it naturally result in lower average ticket size and a slight compression of the yield.

Furthermore, the rural market has seen improved cash flow availability due to the harvesting cycle, allowing customers to make timely repayments, access rebate schemes, and remain within the lowest ROI brackets. However, next quarter, we expect the yield to improve by 20 basis or so.

Any further expansion in '27 and '28?

'27, '28, we will go to our regulator for the approval, and second half, we'll announce our phase of expansion of gold loan branches. First half, we will try to make our existing branches which open in last three, four months to make them grow and achieve the break-even, and thereafter, we'll go for the next expansion round.

Sir, what about the expansion in other branches, other than gold loan? What do you pencil in for FY '27 and '28, other than gold loan?

In the MSME, Micro LAP, and home loan, we are continuously adding. Next year, we can assume that between 100 and 125 branches across Micro LAP, MSME, and home loan, we will add.

Understood. Sir, taking further on the point of MSME sector, the government has continued its stance for supporting the MSME sector.

Based on that, can we assume our exposure towards MSME should also improve? What could be the AUM mix within next two one to two years?

You have seen this quarter also overall we have shown the 19% growth in the MSME segment. If you talk about the composition of AUM, currently gold is about 42% and which will improve to about 45, 46.

As regards MSME and construction finance and housing is concerned, they will largely remain in the range of about 18% to 20% each one.

Understood. Sir, we have already reached our exposure to 40%.

We are currently penciling 45% as the exposure towards gold loan. Currently, the gold prices have already witnessed a high volatility in January.

Do you see a good growth based on it if the prices do fall further or has volatile in Feb and March?

Even though some price correction, which is already seen happening, but on ground, there is a still the larger market of the gold loan still exist in the informal segment with the small money lender and the small jewelry shop who also do the lending activity. That market is continue to shift to the organized sector because of the fair practice and the better interest rate.

I believe that still lot of market which is going to shift from the informal to formal, and we'll see decent growth in the gold loan segment in the coming years.

That was it from my side. All the best for the next quarter.

Yes, hi. My question is that given that the borrowings announced in the budget is going to be more and this will result in higher yields for government finances, do you see an increase on cost of funds for the company because of that for FY

'27? I put it this way that across the level if the cost goes up, then by all the lenders that is actually get passed on to the borrower.

Any cost reduction happens because of a better credit rating or otherwise, that benefit accrue to us. In case the cost goes up, we'll be able to pass on because that will happen for every lender, and that cost will, of course, will get passed on to customer.

That will not change our spread. However, any cost reduction which we achieve because of mix of borrowing by using the short-term instrument like commercial paper or short-term NCD or by improvement in credit rating, these two features, that benefit will directly accrue to the P&L.

What happens in the case where banks who are competing with gold loans and companies like Capri Global, for them, their cost of funds do not increase as much as they will be for an NBFC? Because of heightened competition, could this result in the yields on gold loans coming down?

In any case, banks are lending at less than 10%, and the gold loan NBFC are lending anything between 15% to 18% rate. Already that difference is there.

The customer segment of the banks and NBFC are entirely different. Second thing, focus of the gold loan NBFC is purely only on the gold loan customer where the banks do many other product also.

Attention to the customer, customer servicing to the small borrower borrowing ₹30,000, ₹40,000, ₹50,000 for a six-month loan where bank margin may not be even ₹500, the service and the attention of NBFC is going to be the key differentiating area. It is not that the banks are not lending today at low rate.

That 25 basis here and there, not even the today difference is more than 500 basis point. Still, all the gold loan NBFCs are continued to grow.

I think that is not the factor of rate of interest what rate banks are lending, what rate we are lending. They are entirely two different segment of customers.

Got you. The other question I had was regarding the gold LTV.

You explained right now regarding the prior participant. The question I wanted to ask was that till what price of gold are we comfortable, after which if it falls, we would have to start, as you explained, you'd have to start calling customers and managing that?

What kind of price fall would you still be okay with?

You have to understand it like this that a customer whom we are given a 1 lakh and say against the gold of ₹1 lakh, we are given a ₹75,000 of loan, that is a regulatory limit. Our portfolio currently sitting at 60.

It means that our portfolio is already at ₹60,000. Assuming that somebody we are given the loan in the month of January when the gold loan prices have gone up 10% again then follow more than 10%, that time you were having a loan to value not 25%, but we were following a loan to value of only 65%.

So 35% margin we were taking. Even though gold loan prices fall 10%, still till then it will remain within 75% range.

The moment his LTV breaches, where the LTV exceeds because of the reduction of the gold loan value beyond 75%, suppose some customer's LTV have become 78% or 79% on a particular day, 4% breach in a ₹75,000 loan, which means that ₹3,000 we have to recover from him. From the system, auto message will be sent to the customer that your LTV have been breached by this and this amount.

Within 14 days, if you don't restore the margin, we have the right to auction the gold, plus it will also invite the penal charges and this and that. Customer is being called by the branch, and SMS is already sent to him, and recovery is done.

It is not that in one day 25% correction will happen and we are out of the money. Correction will happen gradually, and there's adequate system-based alert and calls are triggered, and recovery is made from the customer.

Individual customer we have to collect ₹3,000, ₹4,000, ₹5,000 only to make up that margin. In the worst scenario, we will end up in selling the gold and realizing our money.

Being ticket size being so granular and the risk is so diversified, this does not pose a real risk in terms of recovery. Gold being so liquid and gold is the only asset class where customer part with the possession, it remain in our custody, there's no process of taking the possession, something like that in real estate.

Here gold is in our possession, we can sell and realize our. There's no real risk in this as such.

Got you. The other question I wanted to understand is that what kind of growth momentum do you foresee for quarter 4 and also for the next financial year, if you can give some guidelines?

I think we have said that this year we will continue to deliver a growth AUM to be in the range of about 33,000 to 34,000, and we are on that track. Already we achieved ₹30,400 crore this nine months period.

We will continue to grow. Next year, we revise our guidance to deliver anything between about 43 to 44,000.

Earlier, we said that we'll achieve ₹50,000 crore AUM by FY '28. Now that guidance we revise to reach to ₹55,000 crore by FY '28.

Alongside this growth, do you have any targets for your ROA and ROEs, what you think you would achieve by FY

'28? I think we have already delivered in this quarter 4% ROA, and we continue to maintain that our aim will be to deliver ROE in the range of about 16%-plus, and ROA anything between 4%

to 4.25%. Got you.

Wonderful. Thank you.

All the best.

My question is on this gold loan ratio. While answering the earlier participant questions, you said that you have a margin of around 35 to 40%.

I see a presentation wherein it's said that your loan-to-value ratio is around 72%, which means that you have a margin of around 28 to 30%. Can you help me understand what is this two things?

What I think you are seeing the slide number eight is referring the incremental disbursal. Okay.

Incremental disbursement for all three months, if you've seen Q3 FY '26, showing 72%. Now 72% thereby it would mean that on the day when we disbursed, suppose we disbursed in the month of November and gold prices have gone up, thereby it would mean that my LTV will keep coming down.

In the current trend where the gold was going up, our LTV started falling. Okay.

Hope we are able to clarify you.

Understood. Thank you for the clarity.

Thanks for giving me opportunity. Could you share your perspective on the medium-term capital trajectory as growth continues, as capital adequacy converges towards target levels?

How should investors think about trade-off between growth, leverage, and potential capital return?

We have adequate capital. As I explained, currently is about in the range of about 30%.

We have adequate capital to support our growth for next two years, till FY '28, the AUM whatever we intend to reach of ₹55,000 crore. Within that, as I said, 23% is off-balance sheet item, which is the co-lending, for that there is no capital allocation is required.

Keeping that in mind, we currently only have about 2.8x leverage. We are quite comfortable to achieve our target AUM of FY '28 with the current capital.

Thank you.

Hello. My question is given higher competition in secured MSME and LAP, are new loans coming at similar economics as before?

The pricing is getting tighter. How are you compensating through underwriting discipline or risk controls?

I think the biggest lever we are focusing, as we said, we are using technology platform across the way we onboard the customer, the way we process our loan, the way we do underwriting, and later how do we do collection of the loan. The entire focus is how do we improve our productivity by continuously improving.

These technological-led initiative platform and AI, agentic AI tools are making a sea change. If we can say that while number of branches have gone up significantly, AUM have been doubled, head count have increased only by a marginal 19% of that.

Our focus is going to become how you become operationally very, very efficient by using all these tech and data science tools. Our focus is going to remain that same amount of disbursement we do with the less number of people, with the less operating cost.

Our model has become very, very robust, and that is driving our ROA and ROE. If you see quarter-on-quarter, the improvement have been seen.

Despite we continue to remain in growth phase, while we continue to add on the branches, the new capital have been added, and still we are able to deliver the ROA of 4% and ROE about 15%, result of the focus on productivity, efficiency using the tech and data science tools.

Okay. Thank you, and all the best.

Yes, sir. Thank you, sir.

Thank you first of all for the opportunity, and congratulations, sir, for such excellent set of numbers. Majority of my questions are answered, actually.

I just had one question. We have been affirmed by CRISIL the rating of A1+, and our average cost of borrowings, our self-calculated stand at 9.5%, and the lowering of cost of borrowings is one of the major things for us behind our ROE accretion.

You guided around few quarters before that our cost of borrowings is expected to come down once the rating gets upgraded. Any something like talks with the rating companies or so that it's a big driver for us regarding our return ratios, sir?

I would like to say that cost of funds have already been reduced by 24 24 basis on the back of strong performance. The internal rating model which banks follow, basis that they have reduced the rate of interest in the risk spread.

Further, we are diversifying the borrowing by mixing the short-term tool which are available at a shorter tenor, but at lower cost, like commercial paper and short-term NCD. So 24 basis is already achieved, and we expect on the back of good performance, credit rating should happen.

Now, not that credit rating agency tell that in advance it will happen, but we believe it is a focus on continuous effort, and better performance will yield to the rating upgrade. Whenever it happens, that they decide, and they let everyone know in the public domain also.

Without that also, by mix of borrowing and other measures, we see that continuously will bring our cost of funds further down. Whenever the credit rating happens, maybe after annual result or when, everybody will let you know.

There's a sharp focus on reducing the cost of fund by another 24, 25 basis so that whatever 50 basis we expected, that we bring it down in next 3 to 6 months time.

Okay. Basically, due to the RBI rate cuts and follow-through from the banking system, you are estimating around 25 to 50 bps another one.

If the rating gets upgraded to, more, AA+ or anything like that, then what is the minimum expectation that the company has of lowering the cost of borrowings because that will be in class with the top A NBFCs? That will be a big trigger for companies like Capri Global, actually, sir.

As we said, 24 basis is already achieved, another 20 to 25 basis we intend to achieve in next 3 to 6 months without accounting any rating upgrade. Whenever the rating upgrade happens, that is a gradual process that a lot of other avenues open up and then banks also take the measure, and it takes 6 to 9 months to actually effect to come in the P&L because the rating reset of the existing borrowing happen at the reset date.

New borrowing immediately start happening at the lower rate. Is a process which happened in a gradual manner, not that the moment rating upgrade happen, the entire borrowing cost comes down.

Yes, in 6 to 9 months, the effect can be seen. Again, 24 basis is already achieved, another 20 to 25 basis will achieve another between 3 to 6 months time, and whenever the rating upgrade happens, that will happen.

The cost advantage will accrue between 6 to 9 months from thereon.

Okay. Thank you, sir, and all the best.

Again, congratulations for excellent set of numbers, sir. Thank you.

Thank you.

Hello. Good afternoon.

My question is on Micro LAP. You mentioned you're targeting a portfolio of ₹3,000 crore in next two to three years.

If you could share some color on customer demographics, what is the yield you're targeting and average ticket size of the portfolio? Also, what are the driving factors you're seeing that you would be able to achieve this target in next two to three years?

Micro

LAP average ticket size is about ₹5 lakh. It is collateralized by security.

The yield is in the range of about 23% to 24%. Currently, AUM is about ₹650 crore from the 51 branches.

In next three years' time from now, we intend to have a loan book of about ₹3,000 crore.

In the ground situation you're seeing, how is the customer behavior or how is the repayment ability? The factors that will help you in achieving your.

Currently, our collection efficiency in the range of Micro LAP is a 98%, which is very, very good. We are not like other Micro LAP lenders, we are using here technology and other tools to see that we are able to at the time of sourcing the customer, bad customers are rejected there itself.

GNPA at the end of third quarter is about 0.9%, which is very, very good. Our P&L account for even the GNPA happen in this range, because we are making the yield about 23, 24%, even 2, 2.5% is reasonable.

Since this is a new portfolio and we are continue to focus on our technological tool, I think the way we are sourcing customer, the way we are underwriting the customer, we are going to create the new benchmark in the industry in the Micro LAP.

Sure, sir. Okay.

Thank you.

Hello. Hi, everyone, and thank you for the opportunity.

I guess majority of my questions have been answered. My specific query was on the resignation of the CEO.

The person was appointed and resigned within a period of less than four months. There were some rumors in the market as well.

If the management could provide a little more clarification than the sentence that was provided in the press release that he's pursuing entrepreneurial journey, it would be a little more better for us.

Thank you. Yes, Mr.

Monu, who was based through out from Delhi, he was earlier in IIFL. We hired him, and before actually he gets settled down, I think rather than coming to Bombay and shifting his base here, he thought and we considered his decision in terms of that at this juncture of his 52 age, he would like to pursue some entrepreneurial opportunity, and he changed his mind, and he has gone back to Delhi, and he's told us that he's going to start something entrepreneurial in Fintech space.

Having said that, not that he has built some businesses and involved, he just recently came, and within a short span of time, less than a quarter, he made up his mind. Neither he brought any certain number of team members along with him, there's an impact of team coming, team going.

I don't think it has much impact. There's adequate number of professionals in team in each vertical, be it MSME, be it gold, Micro LAP, housing finance, car loan.

There's a separate risk head. There's a group CRO.

All that is in place, and it is not going to have any adverse impact as such.

Understood. My specific issue was on the front that after such a high-level KMP is entering the company and leaving in such a short span of time, it might have a signal that there are some type of underlying issues or something.

I guess your answer addresses my query. Thank you.

Thank you. To conclude, as we all know that we delivered a strong performance in Q3 FY '26 with a healthy AUM growth across our key lending segment supported by a diversified and predominantly secured portfolio.

Profitability improved during the quarter, driven by changing mix to high-yield products, improving margins, strong growth in fee income, and operating leverage from our existing branch network, while asset quality remained resilient. With a strong capital position and continued investment in technology and distribution, we are well-positioned to scale efficiently and are confident of increasing our AUM target to ₹55,000 crore by FY '28 and sustainable return on average equity of 16% to 18% and return on average asset in the range of about 4% to 4.25% by FY '28.

Thank you.