Thank you, Darwin. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us this afternoon.

I will, as usual, begin with some opening remarks before handing over to Devang, who will take you through the financial performance. Anup and Paritosh will cover the retail and institutional businesses respectively, and Jaideep will provide an update on our subsidiary performance.

For the quarter, the group delivered 5,645 crore in profit after tax, a growth of 26% year on year. Let me first talk about the bank and then move to the subsidiaries.

The bank delivered profit after tax of 4,212 crore, up 29% year on year. This quarter's performance demonstrates that our strategy is translating into results.

We are seeing encouraging traction across our focus customer segments, independent product businesses, while our investments in technology are clearly paying off. In terms of balance sheet, our total average deposits grew 19% year on year.

Within this, our CA and fixed rate SA books grew at 17% year on year and 14% year on year respectively. Excluding FCNR deposits on an end-of-period basis, deposits grew by 13% year on year, and CASA would have stood at 41.8%, up from 40.3% sequentially.

Let me spend a couple of moments on the FCNR(B) program. We believe that the FCNR(B) program is a one-off opportunity.

We have raised $5.78 billion or ₹55,000 crore through the program, significantly ahead of what our deposit market share would ordinarily imply. This amounts to as much as 9.7% of the June deposit base.

These inflows have supported our objective of increasing the tenor and stability of our deposit franchise by adding longer-duration and fixed-rate funding to the balance sheet. During the quarter, we used part of the proceeds to fund the acquisition of Kotak Mahindra's investment loan portfolio, run down relatively high-cost deposits, and reduce dependency on IBPC borrowings.

Strategically, we are balancing the timing of the deployment of these deposits into customer assets to build the franchise and take advantage of the increasing rate cycle. We expect to deploy the remaining funds over the next few quarters.

Net advances grew 25% year on year, which includes 16,000 crore of loans against FCNR(B) deposits and a transferred loan portfolio of around 9,600 crore from Kotak Mahindra Investments. Excluding both of these, our core net advances grew 19% year on year, in line with our philosophy of growing our advances at 1.5 to 2 times normal GDP growth.

In the unsecured retail segment, as we've been saying, we continued to grow in absolute terms, with sequential growth now visible in personal loans, business loans, credit cards, and retail microcredit, i.e. across the board.

Further, the benefits of our strong underwriting disciplines and enhanced collections capabilities are continuing to come through. This is reflected in credit cost, which improved to 35 basis points in Q2 FY '27 from 46 basis points in Q1 FY '27.

On costs, the underlying growth remains broadly flat sequentially, adjusting for the FCNR(B) impact. We continue to see the benefits of our focus on cost discipline, with cost to assets declining steadily over the last six quarters to 2.4% in Q2.

Let me now turn to our subsidiaries. Quarter-end volatility in equity and bond markets impacted investment income across subsidiaries.

However, core operating performance remained healthy, with investment banking delivering a very strong quarter, driven by a rebound in primary market activity and a robust pipeline, maintaining its prime leadership position. The strong domestic inflows supported the asset management and alternate asset businesses.

With this, the subsidiaries contributed 26% of consolidated profit after tax. Reflecting the strength of the overall franchise, consolidated book value per share increased by 16% year on year.

To conclude, we are encouraged by the progress across the customer franchise. Advances have grown in line with our stated philosophy, while our liability franchise continues to strengthen.

The One Kotak approach has helped us deepen customer relationships. Credit costs have been brought under control, and technology is driving greater productivity.

We are confident in our ability to deliver responsible and profitable growth. With that, let me hand it over to Devang to take you through the financials in greater detail.

Thank you, Ashok, and good afternoon, everyone. Let me first take you through the key highlights of bank's standalone performance.

Bank's balance sheet grew 25% Y-o-Y, and the total balance sheet size at 30th September is now almost 9 lakh crore. Profit before tax for Q2 was 5,579 crore, which grew by 29% Y-o-Y and 2% on a Q-o-Q, driven strongly by the growth in NII of 16% Y-o-Y.

Non-interest income grew 23% Y-o-Y. Sustained improvement in cost to income ratio from 2.67 in Q2 FY '26 to 2.4 in Q2 FY '27.

Continued improvement in credit cost from 0.79 in Q2 '26 to 0.35 in Q2 '27. The operating profit also grew by 21% Y-o-Y and 4% on a Q-o-Q basis.

Our advances grew 25% Y-o-Y and 13% Q-o-Q basis. Excluding loans provided by international branches of the bank against FCNR(B) deposits and the loan portfolio acquired from Kotak Mahindra Investments Limited, advances grew by 19% Y-o-Y and 8% on a Q-o-Q basis.

Advances growth in Q2 FY '27 was across all business segments, primarily driven by SME, which was supported by the ECLGS scheme, corporate banking, and retail banking. Our unsecured retail advances share is 8.1%, and in absolute terms, the portfolio grew by 1,730 crore as against 707 crore in Q1 of FY '27.

The growth mainly came in MFI, credit card, and personal loan and business loan segment. This quarter also saw good traction in our commercial vehicle and construction equipment business.

During the quarter, there was a net reduction in the IBPC borrowing by 9,800 crore, utilizing the proceeds from the FCNR(B) mobilization. Coming to the deposits, our total deposits grew 23% Y-o-Y and 14% Q-o-Q on a end-of-period basis, while the average deposit grew 19% Y-o-Y and 8% on a quarter-on-quarter basis.

Deposit performance was mainly driven by strong growth in granular retail current account balances and term deposits. Within deposits, current account grew 17% Y-o-Y on average basis, and fixed rate SA grew 14% Y-o-Y on average basis.

Excluding FCNR(B) deposits, regular term deposits grew by 15% Y-o-Y on average basis. Further, we repaid high-cost certificate of deposits during the quarter.

CASA ratio excluding FCNR(B) deposit was 41.8% as against 40.3% on June 30th. Friends, while the FCNR program is a one-off opportunity, let me highlight the financial implication on the Q2 results.

As Ashok mentioned, we mobilized 55,344 crore in deposits, which is almost 9.7% of our June total deposit base, and we gave loans of 16,100 crore, which is about 3.1% of our net advances at June 30th against FCNR deposits. These deposits were deployed towards funding acquisition of KMIL loan, which is about 8,900 crore, and net repayment of IBPC amounting to 9,800 crore.

Strategically, we will use this deposit to fund customer asset growth over next few quarters, taking advantage of the higher interest rate cycle. Net interest margin for the quarter was 4.31%, a drop of 22 bps on sequential basis.

FCNR(B) deposits and related advances contributed 15 bps to this drop. The balance drop was due to quarter-specific day count variation, which is consistent with the pattern observed in prior periods, and repayment of IBPC.

The underlying core margin broadly remains same as quarter one, which is also reflected in the NII growth of 16%. Going forward, NIM will reflect full-quarter impact of FCNR(B) mobilization, which will be offsetted by progressive deployment of FCNR(B) deposits in customer assets and repo rate transmission on floating rate advances.

Cost of fund for Q2 FY '27 was 4.52%, which included impact of increase in share of term deposit on account of FCNR(B) mobilization. Our cost of fund continues to remain one of the lowest among large peers.

Non-interest income for quarter two grew 23% Y-o-Y. Excluding processing fee on the advances against FCNR(B) deposits, non-interest income grew by 17% Y-o-Y.

Growth in this non-interest income was mainly driven by higher FX gains, traction in debt capital market syndication fees, and fees from higher disbursement across businesses. Q1 FY '27 non-interest income included dividend income from subsidiaries of 570 crore.

Our cost to asset for the quarter was at 2.4%, down from 2.66 in Q1 '27. The operating expenses grew by 14% Y-o-Y and 3% on a Q-o-Q basis.

Excluding one-time cost relating to borrowing by the bank's international branches, total operating expense grew by 11% Y-o-Y and flat on a Q-o-Q basis. We continue to invest in our brand and technology.

Cost to income was at 45.2%, a Y-o-Y reduction of 160 bps. We continue to see improvement across all asset quality parameters, with gross NPA declining to 1.04 from 1.18 in the previous quarter, net NPA improving to 0.24 compared to 0.27, and provision coverage ratio remaining above 78%.

Credit cost for the quarter 35 bps compared to 46 bps in quarter one, while slippage ratio declined to 0.85 from 1.03 sequential quarters. The unsecured portfolio continues to show improvement in credit cost, and delinquencies in retail CV have stabilized.

As of September 30th, the bank's net worth is at 145,984 crore, which includes 10,958 crore of MTM gain on select investments accounted through the AFS reserve, which has not been routed through the profit and loss account. ROE for the bank is 11.65% for the quarter.

Adjusting for this non-cash AFS reserve, the ROE improves to 12.55%. Overall capital adequacy of the bank is 21.9%, of which CET1 is 21.4%.

Return on assets for Q2 is 1.92, with average balance sheet growth of about 26%, and was higher by 4 bps on a Y-o-Y basis. This quarter's FCNR(B) mobilization has provided a significant liquidity, which will be deployed in customer assets over next few quarters, taking advantage of the increasing interest rate environment.

The core performance of the bank continues to improve, with balance sheet growth, volume-led non-interest income growth, sustained cost discipline, and continued improvement in credit cost. Moving to the consolidated business, net customer assets stood at 699,250 crore, a growth of about 21% on a Y-o-Y basis.

The group investment AUM increased to 814,118 crore, an increase of 8% on a Y-o-Y basis. The consolidated net worth of the group is now 194,706 crore, with the book value per share increased to ₹196, with a six-year CAGR of 16%.

Consolidated PAT for the quarter is 5,645 crore, which grew 26% Y-o-Y and 3% on a quarter-on-quarter basis. Q2 FY '27 consolidated PAT was impacted by market-led MTM volatility across the subsidiaries.

However, underlying performance remains strong. Jaideep will take you through the performance of the key subsidiaries in detail.

With that, I hand over to Anup to discuss the highlights of our retail businesses.

Thank you, Devang. Our retail strategy remain anchored on two focus segment, the affluent and private banking India and the core India.

Private banking and affluent India continues to grow very nicely. Our Solitaire premium proposition continues to deliver strong outcome.

As of 30th September, the bank managed a combined relationship value of 13.6 lakh crore across 90,000-plus families. Kotak 811, the cornerstone of core India strategy of ours, is now much wider, much bigger, a scalable digital platform which is driving customer acquisition through their digital strategy of 811, and is also being used as a platform for engagement and acquisition of customers at branches, our sales channels, and our corporate salary relationships.

This differentiated proposition for mass affluent have strengthened our customer engagement, resulting a 34% Y-o-Y growth in savings balances, and this now contributes to 13.3% of total savings. Our deep conviction around core India strategy and our payment strategy has led to significant benefit for us in the changing MDR on UPI.

As of 2026, our UPI issuer market share stood at 3.8%, ahead of our deposit market share. Further, 13.3% of Kotak's UPI remitter transactions by volumes are routed through our mobile applications, underscoring preference of our digital ecosystem.

In a way, we are possibly one of the few banks who have very strong payment strategy. It is the success of this two segment that is reflected in the momentum of our liability franchise.

Our CASA stood at 41.8, up from 40.3. In terms of the numbers, Devang already spoke about.

I'm going to skip the FCNR, since Devang has already discussed about that. Moving to the asset side, mortgage lending, comprising of home loan, loan against property, and affordable housing, we're building long-term relationships with our affluent and self-employed customers, and also driving deposit mobilization through the relationship value.

Our distribution, better digital journeys, our mortgage portfolio grew at 14% and 4% Q-on-Q. We also launched our hybrid home loan on a timely basis, and this has generated strong customer interest.

However, at a overall base, our portfolio continues to remain mostly floating. Our gold loan book, while still relatively small, continues to grow strongly, aided by significant automation of process which we have now delivered.

The unsecured portfolio, Devang spoke about it, between personal loan, business loan, credit cards, retail microcredit, we are seeing good growth, and credit costs have normalized. However, we continue to remain focused on our risk metric, which is within our risk appetite.

Personal loan business, business loan grew 9% Y-o-Y, 4% Q-on-Q. This is further strengthened by our offerings for personal loan and business loan of both term loans and overdraft products to our Solitaire and high net worth customers as well, in addition to mass affluent.

Credit card business, which we earlier spoke about that we re-tracked the business in terms of right product to right customers, as of September 2026, grew 8.9% Y-o-Y and 8.3% quarter on quarter, while portfolio grew 7% Y-o-Y and 4% quarter on quarter. The Solitaire credit card has seen strong acceptance, very high brand recall, and demand for the customers who bank with us, and our spends there is growing very nicely.

Retail microcredit grew about 18% Y-o-Y, 5% Q-o-Q, supported by risk underwriting and the portfolio being covered under credit guarantee schemes. In tractor loans, we maintained our position as a large financer within the play, delivered 11% Y-o-Y and 3% Q-o-Q, while we remain watchful of the potential El Niño-related risk.

This is a business we have built over last two decades, and we have a strong domain understanding of this business and are present across major geographies of India. This is a product, a tractor, which is largely bought by the small and marginal farmers of India who are the backbone of our country's agriculture economy.

Collection efficiencies on tractors have improved significantly, while we have seen no visible impact on delinquency as on Q2 FY '27. We remain very watchful of the evolving weather condition.

All of us know the rainfall deficit for this monsoon season has been about 13%. With that, I will hand it over to Paritosh to take you through the next section.

Thank you, Anup. I will now take you through the performance of the institutional businesses.

Our institutional and SME proposition continues to drive growth while leveraging the group's diversified financial services platform. Across these businesses, our focus is on deepening customer relationships, meeting customer needs holistically, and increasing our share of wallet to improve return.

On the asset side, growth was broad-based across sectors and customer segments in the corporate bank, with the loan book growing by 25% Y-o-Y and 15% quarter on quarter. Credit substitutes grew 44% Y-o-Y and 2% quarter on quarter.

On a combined assets basis, that's corporate bank and credit substitutes, growth was 29% Y-o-Y and 11% quarter on quarter. Adjusting for the KMIL transferred book, the corporate banking loan book grew 17% Y-o-Y and 7% quarter on quarter.

Trade and supply chain finance grew strongly as we have invested in automation to serve our corporate customers and their ecosystem of vendors, dealers, and supply chain partners. GIFT City remains an important strategic driver to meet the global banking needs of our customers, including loans, trade finance, acquisition financing, security services, deposits, and investments.

Alongside asset growth, we are focused on widening engagement across liabilities, transaction banking, and other income streams. This balanced mix of assets, liabilities, and fees is reflected in our healthy ROE in this business.

This quarter, fees across trade, foreign exchange, and debt syndication grew strongly. Corporate bank fee income grew 36% Y-o-Y and contributed 20% of bank's total fee income.

Corporate liabilities grew, driven by granular acquisition, tech and trade flows, collection and payment services, and capital market deals. Our investment in digital capabilities is paying off with 5x Y-o-Y growth in acquiring UPI and a 300 basis point improvement in NACH market share.

Let me move to capital market businesses. Our institutional capital market businesses performed strongly, driven by a rebound in primary market and momentum across investment banking and institutional equities.

These businesses enabled us to serve corporate customers through several marquee transactions, including IPOs, block trades, and advisory mandates. Investment banking had a strong quarter across ECM and advisory, and has a strong pipeline too.

Institutional equities maintained its leadership position with global and domestic institutional investors. Cross-selling investment banking and institutional brokerage products added about 109 basis points to corporate banking ROE.

Custody balances remained impacted by muted FII flows, although domestic traction was good. Let me now move to SME business.

Our relationship-led SME franchise delivered healthy growth, with advances growing 27% Y-o-Y and 10% quarter on quarter to about 1.4 lakh crore, and now accounting for 24% of bank's advances. Asset quality remained resilient.

We have been an active participant in the government's ECLGS program and have sanctioned ₹11,200 crore of ECLGS credit. SME remains a strategic priority for the bank.

We see opportunities to expand primary banking relationships across both enterprise and personal banking, including private banking, affluent, retail, and corporate salary franchise. Agri SME, business banking, and corporate SME have been integrated to achieve improvement in productivity, standardization, automation, and customer journeys.

We continue to invest in distribution, customer acquisition, digital capabilities, and relationship management, and see significant opportunities for growth while maintaining portfolio quality. Let me turn to our CV, CE business.

We are stepping up growth while maintaining disciplined underwriting, ensuring strong collection practices and risk-adjusted returns. In CV, CE, advances grew 8% Y-o-Y and 4% quarter on quarter to over ₹47,000 crore, and account for 8% of bank's advances.

Let me now move to technology investments in the wholesale and institutional businesses. Across the franchise, the investment in technology continues to improve client experience and operational efficiency.

Fyn, our integrated corporate portal, saw a 34% Y-o-Y increase in corporate onboarding and about 60% increase in active customer base as more services become available on the platform. Digital adoption of working capital drawdown and customer service DIY journeys have increased substantially.

I will now hand over to Jaideep to take us through the subsidiaries performance.

Thank you, Paritosh. Let me now take you through the performance of our subsidiaries.

In Q2 FY '27, our subsidiaries reported profit of 1,450 crore, up 18% Y-o-Y, contributing to 26% of our consol profit. The Q2 PAT was impacted by negative MTM on capital market-linked equity investments and movement in yields on our interest-bearing debt investments.

However, underlying performance remains strong. As I've mentioned in the past, one of Kotak's unique strengths is our ability to manufacture and distribute all major financial products through a single platform.

With 100% ownership across our subsidiaries, we retain the full profit and embedded value created across the group. I'll start with the lending subsidiary, Kotak Prime.

PAT for second quarter '27 stood at 251 crore, up 2% Y-o-Y. The business continues to benefit from healthy growth of 12% in customer assets to ₹47,458 crore, while maintaining a disciplined approach towards portfolio quality.

On capital markets, the key development was the rebranding of our retail broking business as Kotak Neo, a unified customer-facing brand for retail investing, trading, and wealth management within the legal entity Kotak Securities Limited. Kotak Securities saw Q2 FY '27 PAT of 348 crore versus 345 crore in Q2 last year, mainly due to higher brokerage income being offset by increase in technology spending and negative MTM on equity investments.

Kotak Neo maintained strong traction in Q2 FY '27, with account acquisitions up 38% Y-o-Y. Bank-referred acquisitions grew 41% Y-o-Y and contributed to 59% of total acquisitions, led by our mobile banking platforms, reflecting the effectiveness of our digital distribution strategy and One Kotak collaboration.

The overall market share of Kotak Securities stood at 13.2%. Interest income also benefited from growth in the MTF book, with a steady market share of about 14%.

On the institutional side, Kotak Institutional Equities continues to be a leading broker for the largest global and domestic institutional investors. Our investment banking business, Kotak Mahindra Capital Company, also had a strong quarter, with improving deal momentum and sustained interest from both strategic buyers and financial sponsors.

As part of our One Kotak strategy, KIE continued to deepen its collaboration with KMCC, our investment banking business, to distribute 13 IPOs/QIPs worth $6.6 billion. KIE also executed 14 ECM blocks worth USD 1.6 billion.

On the asset management business, the Kotak AMC and trustee company's PAT for Q2 FY '27 stood at 287 crore, up 11% Y-o-Y. This was on the back of average AUM growth of 12% Y-o-Y, which stood at ₹635,421 crore.

The scale of this business continues to deliver steady profitability through the cycles, in line with AUM growth and supporting margins. On alternate assets, Kotak Alternate Asset Managers continues to be one of India's leading domestic alternate asset managers, having raised over $11.8 billion since inception.

Given the non-linear nature of the business, performance is best assessed over longer periods rather than quarter to quarter. KAAML, which is Kotak Alternate Assets, profits after tax for Q2 FY '27 stood at 87 crore.

On the insurance side, Kotak Life Insurance, shareholders' PAT stood at 198 crore. The year-on-year profit was a whopping 300%, but it should not be compared as there was a one-time GST-related impact in Q2 of FY '26, excluding which the company continues to deliver steady profit growth.

Gross written premium grew 21% Y-o-Y, while retail sum assured increased 23% Y-o-Y. AUM of the life insurance business grew to 1.12 lakh crore, up 14% Y-o-Y, underscoring the strength of our long-term savings franchise.

I'll now request the operator to begin the Q&A session.

Thanks, team, for such a detailed disclosure on FCNR, not only on the balance sheet side, but at various line items of P&L as well. Just wanted to understand in terms of the P&L implication for KMIL.

KMIL, is it only at the balance sheet level or there was some income booking, because again in the consolidated numbers we have shown the profit of KMIL separately. Want to understand the implications, detailed implications of KMIL in P&L.

The second question is on FCNR deployment. You indicated that largely it's towards the borrowings of KMIL as well as in running down the IBPC and not much into the customer assets as such.

Then do we assume that maybe there should be a much better growth traction going forward as this excess liquidity gets utilized, because out of 55, only 19, 20 would have been utilized towards it. There is a good chunk which is left to be deployed, and that should push the overall growth momentum further compared to what we saw in the first half.

Hi, Kunal, Devang here. To answer your question on KMIL, as the KMIL loan transfer was a part of the regulatory requirement, we transferred in the beginning of the quarter most of the eligible loans to the bank.

The loans which got transferred in first half of the quarter, the first month of the quarter, have started obviously earning the required NII, and that is included in the Q2 performance, so that loan income is already started booking in. Now for the loan, obviously, bank paid the KMIL, and KMIL also had a net worth, combined with the net worth and the amount which received on that, the KMIL obviously has deployed it in investments, which is earning and which is reflected in the PBT of the KMIL.

KMIL obviously also has liabilities, which will be repaid as it matures as a part of this funding which we've got. KMIL of course also has a standard provision release which has happened, the P&L of the KMIL, what you see because the loans got transferred from the KMIL to the bank, the standard provision created on the KMIL books got released

and

obviously got booked in the bank, which we have disclosed I think in the EU which is there. That's on the KMIL part of it.

Sorry, just one part sort of follow-up on this. When we look at it, the interest income component would be higher because you said KMIL borrowings were repaid through FCNR, should I assume that interest expense would be relatively lower on KMIL book, or maybe we need to work with slightly higher spread compared to the bank spread to indicate in terms of how much could be the NII impact for KMIL?

Just assuming maybe 8,900 crore we need to consider it to be 6%, 7% spread on it, or maybe we have to take it on yield assuming that there is no interest liability?

Kunal, let me try and clarify this very clearly. First week of July, KMIL's assets were transferred to the bank, okay?

When KMIL's assets were transferred to the bank, the funding of those assets would have come from the FCNR deposits, in terms of deployment of the 55,000, Devang mentioned about 9,600 went to fund the KMIL assets. Interest on those KMIL assets in the bank was accrued, okay?

Expenses were obviously there, and then there was a standard provision, right? Now, when you go to KMIL as the subsidiary, obviously the assets went out, they got a bunch of cash, that cash was invested, consistent with the risk appetite of that legal entity, and the profits that are shown in KMIL is those kind of profits,

plus reversal of standard

provision in KMIL. Is that correct?

Perfect. Yeah.

There would be some overlap between KMIL credit cost and maybe the reported numbers out there in KMIL.

No. There is no overlap.

KMIL standard provision was released—

Here we booked it. Got it.

At consolidated, there is no impact. Perfect, yeah.

Exactly correct.

Consolidated level, there is a higher impact, because on real estate lending which KMIL used to do, there was a lower provision in an NBFC, while once it comes to bank, the provision is higher, there is 1% standard asset provision in the bank, while in the NBFC it was only 0.4%.

Perfect. That helps.

Yeah. The only thing was NII growth sequentially on core business would have been closer to 4 odd percent compared to 6.7%, which is including KMIL.

Kunal,

KMIL is 9,600 crore. Out of 5 lakh crore, for one quarter, it is minimalistic.

It is minimalistic, okay?

Agreed. Perfect.

That helps.

What was your question on FCNR deployment?

Largely maybe you mentioned FCNR deployment was more towards KMIL, and it was towards the IBPC run-down, we have not yet deployed entirely into customer assets. Maybe in terms of the growth outlook, should we expect much better growth momentum because almost 25, 30 odd thousand crore of FCNR would still have to be deployed into the lending ecosystem, and across what verticals we would look at it, yeah.

Thanks.

Kunal, see, besides the FCNR inflow and the liquidity, you see the core liquidity and the deposit is also growing, right? The FCNR deployment will be in addition to the core deployment from the core deposits, so that is first, right?

I think as I mentioned, clearly that liquidity, which is not yet deployed, will be deployed over the next few quarters to take advantage of the rate cycle, and the tenure and the segment which we would like to focus going forward. To that extent, yes, FCNR liquidity is in addition to the core growth of the bank, which will reflect going forward.

Perfect. Got it.

Okay. Thanks.

That answers the question. Yeah.

Hi. Congrats on a good results, and thanks for the opportunity.

I have two questions. One is on the FCNR(B) deposits.

We have mobilized very good quantum of deposits and all at a very low level of leveraged loans, and probably the lowest among the large banks. The bank isn't really as much appreciated for the NR franchise or mix of overseas assets, I was just curious to know what has supported this strong mobilization for the bank?

Any color around that?

Nitin, first of all, thank you. Appreciate it.

One of the things that I've been kind of talking about continuously is the key pillar of automation, digitization, and customer journey automation. We've kind of doing it across the bank, and that's benefited volumes across the bank, but we've also been doing it quite significantly for the NR business.

One of the reasons that we've actually been able to get 12 partners across the Middle East and South Asia signed up is because the process that we put into place and made it really easy for the banks to kind of work with us has really helped us get this disproportionately high market share.

Right. The other question is on the unsecured assets.

Now that we are seeing some traction across all the unsecured segments, any number or outlook in terms of how will we want this mix to shape up, what kind of growth rate we are looking at? Will it continue to grow higher than the overall loan book?

I think your point is right. We have started seeing between personal loan, business loan, microcredit, and credit cards, the credit costs are now within the risk appetite of what we feel comfortable.

Listen, we don't want to make it very high growth, we don't want to make it very low growth. I think the strength of the franchise is very strong.

We are providing the products to a lot of our existing customers so that we get the rightful customer segment, but also at a lower cost. I think that's the core focus around this segment, and our relative market share is very small, we do have opportunity to grow this.

Right. Lastly, on the CV and CE business also, we did experience some asset quality issues in that segment in the past, and we are now going in a more measured way.

How are we looking at the credit environment in this particular segment, and will we look to grow at a more calibrated pace or how is the approach that we are going to take here?

Hi. This is Paritosh.

CV, CE business, in Q1 we were measured considering the impact of war and we were really trying to watch, but we are seeing over last couple of quarters, the default rates have been coming down, our collection efficiency is improving, and that is a reason it gives us, and we have really also invested substantially on collection infrastructure in those businesses, and hence this remains a priority for the bank, and we continue to build this business further.

Got that. Thank you.

Thanks, everyone, for answering the questions. Thanks.

Hi. Congrats on the quarter, and thanks for taking my question.

Just firstly going back to the KMIL thing. Now, KMIL will still be servicing the loan, right?

It's just on our book, but they are the interface for the customer. Or are we absorbing those employees?

Let me try and clarify this thing. Right, there was a former business circular issued by the Reserve Bank of India where they said that you can't do the same business in multiple legal entities.

As a result of that, we have said all activities will be done in the bank, and therefore KMIL has transferred, one-time transfer of all the assets to the bank. KMIL currently is in the process of repaying its liabilities, and whatever capital is left, we will deal with it over a period of time, right?

There is no question of the KMIL will not be an operating entity going forward. As of

now, all the—

All the loans have already been transferred, people have been transferred, servicing is being done by the bank.

That's clear. Just secondly, I think I heard you say that 20% of the fee income this time came from corporate banking.

What was it last quarter and the same quarter last year?

Fee... Maybe we'll just pick up the number and respond in a couple of minutes.

Meanwhile, we can continue with the questions.

Perfect. No, that fits for mine.

Thanks, and all the best.

Sorry, Darwin. Last quarter also it was 20% of the total fee income was in corporate bank.

Hi. Good afternoon, and thank you for taking my question.

Can I come back on KMIL again? Sorry, just on the NII, I want to confirm.

In the NII, you only have interest income from KMIL, you don't have any interest expenses?

Yes, only interest income. As Ashok mentioned, the entire book was—

Under FCNR point, yeah.

Not the FCNR.

The interest income on the loan which got transferred from KMIL to the bank for this quarter got booked in the bank. That is the NII income on those loans have reflected in the bank, but as Ashok mentioned, it's only 9,600 crore, which is less than 2% of the total size of the bank's loan book.

It doesn't have a significant impact, but yes, the NII or interest income on those loans is booked in the bank. KMIL got the money from the bank.

Because KMIL got the money from the bank, it invested that money, and therefore has an interest earning, but no interest expense.

Understood that. Thank you so much on that.

Just to clarify, and then separately, KMIL has been taken over at the same yields that were in the KMIL disclosures, right? Because if there's a fair value adjustment, just wondering if the yields were trued up or something.

Is it similar 11% yield?

When you say yield means what? On

loan book.

No, KMIL had loans to corporate segment as well as to real estate segment, total of about 9,600 crore. The yield in KMIL was marginally higher than the yield in the bank, and it's about 3% spread on the KMIL book, which effectively is being booked in the bank from Q2 onward.

The assets are just moved from KMIL to the bank.

Same rate,

everything is the same in the bank.

Nothing changes. It is an assignment of loan from one entity to the other entity.

As far as customer is concerned, the loan contract remains as is.

Got it. Okay.

Thank you. Then finally, on that deployment strategy, at the moment, if the money is sitting as liquidity, could you just enlighten us on as to what kind of yields do you make or spreads do you make when it is sitting as liquidity?

Are you making OIS, or are you kind of investing in 6-month bonds, or how are you parking this liquidity so we understand how much the NII improvement could be in the following quarter?

Look, that is actually part of our treasury operations and treasury kind of strategy. Here we're not going to get into a lot of detail as to what our treasury folks do, but as Devang pointed out, that over the coming quarters, as these funds are deployed into customer assets to build a franchise, yes, there will be some improvement and NIM pick-up.

Okay. Thank you.

Good day.

Thank you.

Hi, team. Congratulations on great set of numbers.

I had a question with respect to loan growth outlook. The loan growth now is towards the higher end of your guided range, 2x nominal GDP.

The outlook over here, if I look at liquidity on the balance sheet, great. Loan growth is broad-based.

Trying to see if it's a fair assumption that this could sustain?

Sumeet, hi. Our stance on this one, right?

We always try and aim between 1.5 times to 2 times nominal GDP growth. We look at opportunities in the marketplace, and you know that we have no restriction as far as liquidity or capital.

Where we see the opportunity, we will grow, right? It's always about profitable and responsible growth, right?

That's the philosophy that we've been kind of going after. We've got credit costs under control, and therefore a continued focus on responsible and profitable growth.

Thank you.

Thanks, Sumeet.

Hi. Good afternoon, everyone, and congratulations for the quarter.

Just how should we think about opex growth going forward? If you see the last two years, it was 10% last year and I think 4% the year before.

Now we are looking at probably higher growth in retail loans, overall higher loan growth, even term deposits, etc., need to be raised incrementally going forward. How should we think about the overall opex growth?

I don't mean in cost to income terms, if we just think about opex, should it be mid-teens, low teens, single-digit? How should we think about it, and where are the investments required in the next, say, two years?

Look, when we think of opex growth, we divide it into a couple of buckets, right? One big bucket is obviously acquisition cost, and like I said, our aim is to grow at 1.5 to 2 times nominal GDP growth, and where we see opportunity for safe and profitable growth, we will go aggressively at it.

Therefore, if opex grows on account of acquisition costs, that we really, really appreciate. Number two, the second bucket really is about technology, and as we are very big believers in technology and in automating and digitizing, leveraging AI through our business.

Technology accounts for roughly 13% of our total opex, and I suspect it will continue at that level on a go-forward basis, because we will continue to invest in technology. The third is marketing.

I think you would have seen, and I hope you've seen, that our brand-building efforts have really paid off for the company, and we want to continue with that as well. Those are what we call good costs, and those are the kind of costs that we would like to grow.

Now, other costs, which are like fixed overhead or paper or processes which are manual, we want to grow after them aggressively, aggressively, and kind of cut costs to make the place more efficient and build the pipe so that the additional volume, the marginal cost is very, very low. Areas which add value, we're very happy spending the money; areas which we can get much more efficient, we will.

I hope that gives you a sense of how we are looking at opex.

If in terms of good costs that you say, would that be, say, half or three-fourths of your overall cost? In terms of growth, would it lag loan growth?

We don't really disclose different elements of cost other than what is there, right? Now, when we get acquisition, obviously acquisition costs are at the same time as the loan origination, and therefore strongly linked to loan origination, and deposit origination for that matter, and that correlation is very, very sharp.

Got it,

got it. Thank you so much.

I will come back in the queue.

Thank you.

Hi. Thanks, and congrats on very good set of FCNR mobilization in the quarter.

I had two questions. First one on the NIM trajectory.

Devang, you did highlight the pulls and push in the 3Q, while the full quarter FCNR impact would be there, but we also would be deploying the excess liquidity. Is it fair to assume that the margins in 3Q dip and then they subsequently start recovering from 4Q onwards?

That's my first question.

Rikin, hi. As I said, the third element of course, besides what you mentioned, is also the repo rate transmission on the floating rate book, right?

Because that will start from October. Of course, in the Q3, the full effect will not be there, but the repo transmission effect will also starts from Q3, and I think the full impact will be felt in Q4.

I think these are the things we know today, and that is what will impact NIM going forward, basically. Yeah.

At balance, do you think that the positives can offset the negatives or 3Q, just trying to understand the very near-term 3Q trajectory. 4Q onwards, I'm pretty clear that margins will be moving up, if you could throw any light on that?

I think

see, look, we really don't provide margin guidance. Having said that, you know the repo rate and you know that it takes about three months to kind of bleed right through, right?

That we deploy in the rate at which we deploy, right? You can kind of do the math, right?

It shouldn't be significantly different.

Got it. The second question is on ECL.

I think in the previous quarter you had guided that the recurring credit cost can be higher by 12, 15 basis points or so. On the one-time transition, I do appreciate that we have excess significant capital, which can very easily take care of this transition, but there would still be some adjustment required to be made in the net worth.

Would you be able to quantify what that one-time impact could be on the 1st April?

I think, Rikin, I had said that earlier, that the one-time effect will be less than 2% of the net worth which will be there. On this recurring ECL cost also, there have been discussions going on.

Actually, some clarity is still emerging. There are certain clarifications also going on.

I think while we had guided the 12 to 15% thing, bps thing, I think that also I think we'll have to wait for further clarity, which we likely to get during Q3, but the one-time is about less than 2% of the net worth, which I had said earlier as well.

Got it. Thanks.

Just one data-keeping questions, if I may. Could you split the loan book in terms of percentage link to repo, MCLR, and fixed?

We know overall floating-fixed is 70-30, but just the split between repo, MCLR as well?

Rikin, with this loan growth of September, which we have seen, roughly 60% of the book is repo-linked, roughly. This is repo-linked, huh, I'm saying, not floating.

Repo-linked, huh.

Got it. Floating would be 70 total?

Around 65-70 ke beech mein, sort of, yeah.

Perfect. Thank you so much.

Thanks for the opportunity. Probably this question is on unsecured.

If I were to see what's happening since last couple of quarters on unsecured, this quarter, there's a big surge in personal loans movement of nearly, I think, 1,000 crore. We had seen something similar happen in 3Q, 4Q, and then 1Q was flattish.

One is trying to understand the sustainability of a very strong number like this. How should we think of the next couple of quarters?

Second, within that, on microcredit and credit cards, credit card again you have good two quarters back-to-back of nearly 500 crore sort of accretion. Anything that you're doing differently because the industry seems to have a problem on the revolver book?

Second is microcredit, given the El Niño. I'm again just tying all three together, I'm trying to understand if this 17, 1,800 crore kind of a run rate can be continued in the immediate near future.

Thank you.

Hi. Anup here.

See, as I said earlier, our relative market share on this unsecured product is very small. The brand franchise strength is very high.

Now that we have come out of what I spoke about the credit cost, which is within our risk appetite threshold, which we feel comfortable about, we are granularly building the cards business, the PL business, the business loan, and also the microcredit. We don't want to rush it, but just focusing on offering it to our existing customer between PL, cards, and BL, and of course microcredit, where we are doing a 100% guarantee.

We feel reasonably comfortable that we should be able to grow it over a long period of time. The focus is around keeping the cost down, working with our existing customer so that when your size is small, you can do, right?

We went through a crisis, we don't want to try to do it very fast, but we will value compound on this. On the unsecured, we have also started offering both term loans and overdraft products.

Overdraft products are being offered to our affluent customers, and the term loan is being offered to the mass affluent, and that also offers a good corridor because these are products which consumer demand is high.

The new products would have contributed meaningfully to this growth this quarter or still too nascent?

No, no, no. I think slowly and steadily we're building, but we feel good about providing the products which meets customer requirement.

On credit cards specifically, yes, I think this whole Solitaire which we keep speaking about has started really playing out. This is a product which got conceptualized a year back.

We stacked the right products for right customers, and between our branch channel, digital channels, between our relationship manager on affluent, we do see a good traction and product is such that when you think about a good product, people start buying it. I guess it's all about the strength of franchise which we are bringing it to play.

Fair to say the volatility we saw in personal loans last quarter, something like that, 1,000 going to zero and then back to 1,000, something like that should not happen from here?

What was happening, I didn't want to go back to all way back, because last year around, we had done one inorganic portfolio StanC, which was running down. Of course, that was causing that plus minus, but I think that's pretty much off now.

Very small is left, now it's all grunt work, I think it'll be steady and value-compounding. There is traction, because our branch channels are also offering these products quite nicely.

Anup, just to you this particular question, if I could squeeze in. Do you believe unsecured is a good tool for customer acquisition?

That will be my last question.

I never like unsecured to be a good tool. In a bank, you have the advantage of great deposit customers which you get.

Over time, looking at their customers' data, which you have an enormous amount of information in a bank versus others, you just cherry-pick and offer them through a digital experience, low friction. I think there are customers who are willing to take.

I don't like unsecured to be your acquisition tool. That never works.

Perfect, and congrats again for a great set of numbers this quarter.

Hi, sir. Thanks for the opportunity, and congratulations, Anup, on your MD, CEO role.

I have a few questions. First, Anup, on your thought process on non-salaried segment.

It looks like that this segment is catered more by NBFCs and select NBFCs and maybe only calibrated basis by banks. If you look at Kotak, are you under-indexed on that segment?

Is there any thought to increase penetration in that segment, or it would be only gradual, calibrated approach?

What segment was it? Can you repeat?

Sorry, non-salaried segment.

All sir. See, listen, as Ashok has clearly articulated the strategy of the bank, it is built around 4+1+1, which is the affluent and private banking and high-street high customers, which is the affluent India.

The second is the go core India, which is the mass affluent, which we cater through our 811, and now we are broad-based through metal debit card, even in the corporate segments, we are getting good traction. The third is the SME, the brand Kotak very strongly resonates with the self-employed of India, and that's in my mind a core moat of the bank.

Then, of course, the NBFC, the tractor, the CVC, the microcredit, and gold. I think if I look at it, we want to play in all the segments in a rightful corridor.

Self-employed, of course, we are building it up. What we have done is earlier, the SME used to be broken between one in agri, one in consumer, one in mid corporate.

We just brought all of them under one, which is also helping us to double down on it in terms of not only giving them lending products, but in a way focus around, can I get the customer to sole banking with me? Can I get this customer to do family banking with me?

Because the value is in overall relationship value on self-employed rather than just giving a lending product. I guess different license play differently.

Our focus here would be to do overall value. Banks can offer products which non-banks cannot offer, right, if you think about it that way.

We are doubling down on that and also bringing the process, my thinking is if I can get a very good process, people are willing to take it. There is and if your market share is what it is, you can offer.

I guess be meaningful and be steady, and just double down on the core focus segment which Ashok had called out.

Right. Would you believe that in, let's say, PL product, how much will be the non-salaried segment, and would it be lower versus your peers or higher, or is there any scope to increase that?

We don't disclose specific split of salaried, non-salaried, but basis the opportunity of the customer, basis his banking relationship and the depth, we offer it to both salaried and self-employed, whether personal loan to salaried or unsecured business loan to this non-individuals. I guess both has fantastic opportunity, and our relative size being small on that, we can find opportunity to grow, but as I said, just stay on the corridor of the risk appetite, which is acceptable to us.

Right. Secondly, on your thought process on cost to assets, right, which has improved and has been actually improving, and this quarter, because of FCNR, it has improved further to 2.4%.

If I look at relative basis, you're still higher than your peer sets. What is your thought process over this metric over the next 1, 2 years, cost to assets?

Ashok here. Listen.

You see some good improvement just showing in that number. Of course, we have ambition.

It is not right for me to give you a forward guidance on that, but with the kind of focus we're trying to build in, we're doing more from the same customer. Because if you build on a simple acquire and cross-sell model and continue to do better cross-sell, many of this metric can have significant improvement.

Look at it, as Ashok said, where we need to invest, we'll invest, and where we need to take out cost, we'll take out cost, and we will be looking at it very, very clinically.

Thank you once again for joining us this afternoon. Really appreciate your time, and we would look forward to seeing you for the third quarter in January.

Thank you very much. Bye-bye.

Thank you.

On behalf of Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you all for joining us.

You may now disconnect your lines.