Yeah. Good evening and thank you for joining Karnataka Bank's Q3 FY 26 earnings call.

We appreciate the continued interest and engagement from our investors and stakeholders. During today's call, we will walk you through the bank's performance for the quarter ended 31st December 2025, outline the key financial highlights, and share the strategic priorities ahead.

Consistent with our approach since previous quarter, we have provided our investors sufficient time to review the financial results and investor presentation, both of which were uploaded following the conclusion of the board meeting held on 10th February 2026. As highlighted in the previous quarter, the first quarter of FY 26 was a period of significant transition for the bank.

Q3 marks my second full quarter as the bank's MD and CEO, and I am pleased to share that we have built on the momentum and made steady progress in executing our strategy. By keeping our strategic focus intact, we have successfully navigated the transition phase, strengthened operational stability, and laid the groundwork for sustainable growth.

Our mission and vision remain firmly anchored as we move ahead with renewed focus, reinforcing our commitment to disciplined growth, operational excellence, and effective strategic execution in line with the bank's long-term objectives. Before getting into the financials, I would like to highlight that our approach during the quarter was anchored around three key priorities: number one, strengthening retail and MSME growth to build a more resilient and well-diversified portfolio; number two, optimizing funding cost by increasing CASA and reducing reliance on high-cost bulk deposits; number three, sustaining asset quality and provision coverage while maintaining a sharp focus on core profitability metrics such as NIM.

Strategic overview: The banking landscape remains dynamic, influenced by evolving macroeconomic factors such as interest rate movements and liquidity conditions. During Q3, the reduction in the repo rate put pressure on yields across the industry.

In response, Karnataka Bank recalibrated the lending mix to protect margins while continuing to effectively serve the needs of the customers. Our strategy remains clear: retail, agri, and MSME, or RAM, segments remain the core drivers of our growth strategy.

Corporate portfolio rationalization is continuing with continued focus on high-yielding assets. Digital transformation initiatives are gaining momentum with new products and platforms being developed to enhance customer experience and improve operational efficiency.

Let me now present the business highlights. Aggregate business stood at ₹1,81,394 crore as of December 31st, 2025, up by 3% Q-on-Q from ₹1,76,461 crore in September '25.

PAT: Q3 FY 26 PAT was ₹290.79 crore as against ₹319.12 crore in Q2 FY 26, there was a decrease of 9%. Y-o-Y, there is an increase in PAT from ₹283.60 crore in Q3 FY 25.

Further, in line with the bank's commitment to increase PCR, the bank has committed making accelerated provisioning, and the PCR presently stands at 61.23%. Gross advances stood at ₹77,282.85 crore as on 31st December '25, reflecting Q-on-Q growth of 5% from ₹73,644.15 crore as on 30th September '25.

Overall strategy is to continue to focus on growing retail, agri, and MSME, where the growth was led by MSME, housing, and gold loan portfolio with a net book accretion of ₹962 crore Q-on-Q. The bank has been committed to reducing its exposure to low-yielding corporate loans that were opportunistically deployed for better yields than treasury.

As conveyed during the previous calls, we have started replacing IBPC book with higher-yielding loans. IBPC portfolio as on 31st December '25 is at ₹1,639 crore as against ₹1,860 crore as on 30th September '25.

Accordingly, around ₹221 crore of IBPC advances have been replaced in Q3. On a Q-on-Q basis, retail, agri, and MSME segment in Q3 FY 26 has grown by 2%, while mid-corporate advances have grown by around 7%.

As we move forward, we will be continuing the strategy of accelerating the retail growth while also stabilizing our corporate portfolio with good quality and better-yielding loans. Aggregate deposits as on 31st December '25 was at ₹1,04,111.52 crore as against ₹1,02,817.19 crore as at September.

CASA deposits stood at 31.53% of aggregate deposits as against 31.01% in September '25. It is to be noted that in absolute terms, our CASA deposits have grown 3% Q-on-Q over September '25.

CASA accretion continues to be a key priority for the bank, and we have put in place a focused strategies to further accelerate CASA growth over the course of the year. The bank has continued to focus on shifting high-cost bulk deposits to granular or retail deposits of less than ₹3 crore.

Bulk deposits as a percentage of total deposits have calmed down from 5.3% as on 30th September '25 to 4.8% as on 31st December '25. Similarly, bulk deposits as a percentage of term deposits have come down from 7.6% as on 30th September '25 to 7.1% as on 31st December '25.

In line with this clearly articulated strategy, the bank has consciously curtailed the acceptance of high-cost bulk deposits, with the majority of deposit renewals being carried out at a pre-defined card rates. This approach has enabled the bank to exercise better control over its cost of deposits.

Retail term deposits, that is less than ₹3 crore, have seen a growth from ₹65,531.80 crore as on 30th September '25 to ₹66,452.24 crore as on 31st December '25. On a Y-o-Y basis, retail term deposits has grown by 6%.

Our focused efforts on new product development and launches remain on track, aimed at bridging the remaining gaps in our product offerings. Launches planned in the coming quarters: Agri Infrastructure Fund, exploring best opportunities under the scheme, which includes assistance for creation of post-harvest management infrastructure and creation of community farming assets; SHG lending, to launch a dedicated product for lending to SHGs; ecosystem tie-up is underway to scale up MSME, including onboarding business facilitators, LSPs for electric vehicle financing; Saulabhya deposit, new variant with partial withdrawal facility; Flexi deposit scheme; supply chain finance and TReDS finance.

Net interest income: Net interest income for Q3 FY 26 stood at ₹792.06 crore as compared to ₹728.12 crore in Q2 FY 26, registering a Q-on-Q growth of 8.8%. Net interest margin stood at 2.92% for Q3 FY 26 as against 2.72% in Q2 FY 26 and 3.02% in Q3 FY 25.

While the cost of deposit and cost of funds have declined, the fall in yield on advances has put some pressure on our NIM during the quarter. However, supported by an increase in CASA, reduction in share of bulk deposits, our cost of deposits has reduced from 5.54% for Q2 FY 26 to 5.43% for Q3 FY 26.

Along with the added focus on the RAM segment, there has been an improvement in NIM during this quarter, and we expect to see our NIM going back to the previous level of around 3% plus. Loan yields: As a result of recent cut in repo rate, owing to reduction in external benchmark rates partially offset by the changes in the product mix, yield on advances for Q3 FY 26 stood at 8.71% as compared to 8.98% in Q2 FY 26 and 9.37% in Q3 FY 25.

As mentioned during the previous quarter, the bank remains committed to its strategy of replacing the bulky opportunistic advances with direct to corporate and retail advances. Considering the potential churn to higher-yielding segments, we expect to see further improvement in the overall portfolio.

CD ratio for the quarter stood at 74.23% as compared to 71.63% in September '25 and 77.84% in December '24. Stressed assets: Gross NPA percentage as on 31st December '25 stood at 3.32%, amounting to ₹2,565.31 crore as against 3.33% in terms of ₹2,453.10 crore in September '25, thereby showing an improvement of 1 basis points.

The gross NPA percentage as on December '24 stood at 3.11%, that is ₹2,419 crore. Net NPA percentage as on 31st December '25 stood at 1.31%, amounting to ₹994.70 crore as against 1.35%, that is ₹975.96 crore in September '25, thereby showing an improvement of 4 basis points.

Net NPA percentage as on December '24 stood at 1.39%, amounting to ₹1,063 crore. The quarterly improvement in both gross NPA and net NPA percentage shows our bank's intensified efforts to control slippages and improve monetary efficiency through regional collection centers.

Credit cost stood at 0.11% in Q3 FY 26 as against 0.03% in Q2 FY 26 and 0.12% in Q3 FY 25. Gross slippages at 0.47% in Q3 FY 26 as against 0.35% in Q2 FY 26 and 0.40% in Q3 FY 25.

Recoveries for the quarter, excluding upgraded accounts, stood at ₹114.18 crore in Q3 FY 26 versus ₹193.25 crore in Q2 FY 26 and ₹100.52 crore in Q3 FY 25. Standard restructured advances, including related accounts, stood at ₹867.95 crore as on 31st December '25 as compared to ₹939.35 crore as on 30th September '25, registering a reduction of 7.6% Q-on-Q.

Standard restructured portfolio stood at ₹1,113.65 crore as on 31st December '24. Around 55% of the restructured portfolio, that is ₹477.37 crore, comprises of loans that require a 30% recovery for upgradation.

Bank is focusing on recovering the same, post which the same would be moved out of the restructured portfolio. These efforts underline the bank's commitment to reducing the restructured portfolio.

Provision coverage ratio, including technical write-off, stood at 80.90% in December '25 as compared to 81.05% in September '25 and 80.64% in December '24. Excluding technical write-off, PCR improved to 61.23% as compared to 60.22% in September '25 and 56.03% in December '24, in line with the bank's commitment to improving PCR.

Liquidity coverage ratio: As on 31st December '25, LCR stood at 186.84% as against 180 188.16% as on 30th September '25 and as against the statutory target of 100%. Cost of funds: Cost of funds stood at 5.46% in Q3 FY 26 as compared to 5.58% in Q2 FY 25 and 5.69% in Q3 FY 25.

The sequential Q-on-Q improvement in cost of funds is expected to continue in the coming quarters as the benefits of the cut in repo rate materializes. This would be further supported by our continued endeavors to reduce the dependence on bulk deposits and replacing the same with retail deposits at card rates and focus on CASA buildup.

Cost to income ratio: For the quarter ended 31st December '25, cost to income ratio stood at 58.72% as against 58.93% for the quarter ended 30th September '25. The bank has undertaken multiple cost rationalization and monitoring initiatives undertaken by the bank in a bid to renegotiate rents, other commercials, and keep operating expenses under check.

Owing to our reduction in composition of bulk deposits in total deposits along with our added focus on RAM segment, we should see an improvement in net interest income, which will favorably impact cost to income, which is expected to come down to 55% in the coming quarters. ROE: Q3 FY 26 ROE stood at 9.06% as against 10.14% in Q2 FY 26.

ROA: Q3 FY 26 return on advances stood at 0.92% as against 1.03% in Q2 FY 26. We expect to end the year with a return on asset between 1.1% plus.

Expect ROA and ROE to further improve, supported by higher accretion in the high-yielding RAM segment and a gradual shift from bulk deposits to retail deposits. These factors are expected to drive an improvement in net interest income and consequently lead to an improvement in PAT.

I would like to reiterate that Karnataka Bank is built on a strong foundation and is well positioned to capitalize on emerging opportunities. The progress we have made in strengthening our retail and MSME portfolio, optimizing funding costs, and improving asset quality provides a solid platform for sustainable growth in the coming quarters.

Our strategic initiatives ranging from digital transformation to targeted product launches are firmly execution-driven and designed to deliver measurable outcomes. As these initiatives gain further traction, we expect to see a steady improvement in margins, profitability, and return ratios going forward.

While the banking landscape continues to evolve, our resilience, agility, and customer-centric approach remain key differentiators, supported by strong capital adequacy, healthy liquidity, and a disciplined execution framework. Karnataka Bank is well equipped to deliver consistent and long-term value to all stakeholders.

Thank you for your trust and continued support. I would now like to hand over the call to the moderator for any questions and feedback from our callers that we would be glad to take.

Sir, first, couple of questions. What percentage of advances you said are [unclear]—

Yeah. Can you hear me now?

Yeah. First wanted to check out what is the percentage of EBLR or MCLR-linked advances that we have?

Around 51%. Mr.

Vinay Nadkarni, good afternoon. Sorry for—

Good afternoon, sir.

Can you hear me?

Yeah. I can.

Yeah. Around 51%.

Okay. How much of your deposits are still to be repriced downwards?

Sorry?

How much of your deposits are to be repriced downwards in Q4 because of the repo rate cut?

Because of the rate cut, deposits are fixed rate only, no floating rates. Because of the rate cuts, nothing to do with the EBLR and all.

Deposits will be at fixed rate.

Okay. Just one more question: You said you are focusing on MSMEs and the RAM set portfolio.

When I see your SMA-2, maximum outstanding is coming from these three segments, including housing loans. Is there a stress there that we are going to encounter as we grow this RAM book?

No. See, MSME, it was there, no doubt about it.

A portion of MSME is mainly because of renewals. In total, it was reduced from almost 10.2% to 7.6%.

Because of continuous efforts of follow-up and all and the renewal of working capital facilities, we don't foresee any much threat. It is under control.

Okay. Just last question on housing loans.

These are all secured loans, right? Still in SMA-2, you have a sizable portion of housing loans standing there, around 27%.

Why is this delay happening, is there any particular reason?

Housing loan? No.

Housing loan 27%, from where you got that, I don't know. It will be clarified to you separately.

There is no 27% stress at all.

Okay. I'm looking at your slide number 22, where you have mentioned special mention account breakup.

For Q3 FY 26, housing is 26.9%. I assumed that

No. I will clarify to you.

As far as housing loan sector is concerned, there is no 26%. I don't know, I have to check back and I will revert back to you.

Okay. Thank you very much.

I'll join back in the queue.

Yeah.

Good afternoon to all. As I am able to see that the bank has been able to achieve the CD ratio of 74%.

Going next, how are we planning to improve it further?

Good afternoon, Suraj. Yes, it is a continuous effort of increasing the CD ratio.

As I told you earlier also, continuously we are focusing on retail segment, RAM. As I mentioned earlier also, here comes housing, MSME, and gold.

Gold loan also during the current financial year has shown substantial growth. Also, we have revised the rate of interest on housing loan and MSME loans.

We are now at a competitive rate of interest also. Taking all these things into account, this growth started coming from October onwards, along with these RLPs, retail centers started in all 15 centers, and additional delegated powers to the regional heads.

All these are contributory for growth. Growth actually started coming from October onwards.

Taking into account all these factors, I am quite confident that which has gone negative over March till September, now positive traction has started coming. Definitely, I am quite confident that going forward in the remaining months, this growth will be further stepped up and it will show better results in the coming quarters.

Hello, sir. Good afternoon.

This is Pankaj, sir. I would like to know two points.

Number one, gross NPA has increased from 3.11 to 3.32% year-on-year. What would be the behavior of stressed accounts in future and whether any stocks expected ahead?

Number two, what is the strategy for future retail, agriculture, and MSME improvement and branch expansion, sir?

Yeah. Pankaj, good afternoon.

With regard to gross NPA, I had better plans of controlling the stress as well as NPA. In the earlier quarter, I said.

This quarter also, it was very much under control because of one particular account this time. The efforts with regard to controlling has come in the way of negative to the bank.

In this particular case also, single account, big borrower account, I'm quite confident it is fully backed by very good security in the prime location. I'm quite confident that recovery action already started, and recovery process, if it happens before 31st, a big boost to the recovery of the bank, and which will be very much under control.

Otherwise, with regard to NPA, which is very much under control because of our focused attention for recovery as well as follow-up of advances through CRMDs and CRMT. With regard to agri, you mean to say this is agri, you are asking about the target or I missed it?

Branch improvement. I would like to know about the [unclear] improvement.

As far as agri improvement, we have very much on track and we have surpassed the target fixed by the regulator. It is almost as against the target of 18%, we have crossed that 18%.

However, with regard to the subsectors under agri, we are a little bit shortage and we are making all-out efforts to ensure that this target is achieved under that subsectors of small farmers and marginal farmers. Overall agri, we have achieved.

Thanks for the opportunity. My first question is on the NIMs.

We saw a very good improvement, almost 20 basis point improvement sequentially. Now, with no fresh rate cuts, is it fair to assume that 3% plus NIM is achievable in Q4?

Yeah. See, as I mentioned earlier to the earlier caller, we have all strategies in place.

This growth started coming from October onwards. Going further, this growth is continuously happening in all 15 centers, as well as the higher amount of exposure taken up by the head office.

Growth is continuously happening, number one. One is growth.

Other one is the recovery efforts. This both going together will add value.

Continuous efforts on recovery as well as controlling stress and growth, this will definitely give better yield in the coming days. I'm hopeful that it will be 3 plus during the quarter.

It will happen because there is an improvement which you have seen. Added to that, this all has happened, as I mentioned earlier, this EBLR effect where the assets are getting repriced faster, liability side is fixed.

With all these, focus on CASA, everything, definitely it will be 3 3% plus by the year-end.

Hi sir, good afternoon. Hello?

Good afternoon, Tippeswamy. How are you?

I'm good. I hope you are also doing good.

My first question is with respect to gross NPA. There is industry standard, if you see the sector average of GNPA for MSMEs has improved from 12% to 4% now.

With Karnataka Bank, we are still staying around at 8%, as you said, answering another caller.

Yeah.

Are there any special focus that has been placed in order to improve on that front? That is first question.

The second question is, what are the sectors or industries in MSME that is causing this kind of high GNPAs, because the slippage is comparably higher when we compare quarter-on-quarter basis sequentially from four quarters?

Yeah. For the question, as I mentioned earlier, it was at 10.2%, you're right.

It was brought down to 7.6%. Continuous efforts will be there in improving further, in reducing the stress and further slippage to the NPA, number one.

Number two, by and large, our facilities are adequately secured by the collaterals. If not 100%, some collateral backup is there.

That is number one. The sectors, as you asked, mainly contractors, manufacturing, and service.

Here mainly because of cash flow, it is affecting sometimes. The borrowers are in touch with by the controlling office and these teams, as I mentioned earlier, in understanding the problem and timely redressal of the problems, if any.

Otherwise, this improvement could not have happened. I mentioned contractors is around 2.1% stress level reduced to 2.1%, and manufacturing 2.3%, service sector 3.2%.

It is reduced to 7.6%. Our efforts will be continuously on that to further reduce.

This should bring down by the end of this quarter 5% or below 5%. We will work on it.

Thank you for the opportunity. I had a question on the NIMs.

Just looking at slide number 12, I see that on a Q-o-Q basis, the NIM has gone up by about 20 basis points, but the yield on advances has gone down more than the cost of funds by about 15 basis points. I see the CD ratio has gone up.

Is it fair to say that a lot of the improvement in NIM was because of the increase in CD ratio for this quarter?

One is, as you rightly mentioned, improvement in the CD ratio, number one. Number two, we are very cautious with regard to the cost of deposit also.

By focusing on CASA, CASA improvement is also there. With all these efforts, and as you mentioned, CD ratio, definitely and better yield advances, like this retail, otherwise this wholesale advances, we have reduced the liability under IBPC that are yielding lesser advances.

All these are contributory factors, which we are working out in a regular ALCO meeting also, discuss and deliberate and finally take decision, which will contribute.

[unclear]

Hello?

Hello.

Yeah. [unclear]

It is not audible.

Hello?

Hello. Now it is audible.

[unclear]

Hi sir. I hope I'm audible.

Very much. Good evening, Priyank.

Hi sir, how are you? I'm good.

I hope you are doing well.

Yeah. Thank you.

Because I won't get another chance by operator, I would request you to take down the list of questions that I have, okay? I won't take it much long.

I just want your brief, broader guidances to touch base again for the betterment of the public audience. In terms of loan book, you had guided that you would grow to the size of, say, at least ₹77,000 crore by ₹85,000 crore by end of FY 26.

Where are we, how would we progress? The second question, on the CD ratio, you are surely improving it quarter-on-quarter.

We had a target to reach 80% by Q4. What would be that aspirations and how it stands for next year?

On the NIMs, you are surely again improving and you're walking the talk what you had given out in your first conference call. Just to reassure for the public, what would be that NIMs going ahead with the exit of this year, as well as for the next year?

One in this whole aspect, which is just a missing point, is cost to income, which is at 55 which you had guided for a 55% and a better recovery, better improvement which is not yet visible. Your comments on that.

Lastly, on the provisioning front, should we consider ₹100 crore per quarter as a minimum requirement just for our aspirations to improve the PCR ratio by 100 bps every quarter is what we had guided. Now, how should we look that for next quarter and for the coming year?

You had guided for recoveries from the technical written-off book. Where are we, this quarter we couldn't get much income from the written-off book?

The clarification on the restructured account which had slipped last quarter up to ₹100 crore, has that been recovered? If yes, then why the restructured book has just fallen by ₹70 crore versus a ₹100 crore recovery that should have come?

Finally, on the ROA front, you have been very much vocal to have an aspirations of ROA of more than 1%. After long time, we have slipped down that number.

Would you call it one-off and would you yet call it out to be a 1% target to be crossed in the coming quarters? That's all.

Thank you. I hope you had noted down all the questions.

Yeah. Good evening, Priyank.

I think it is one member question or seven members question? Yeah.

Anyhow, in a lighter way, as as I told you, walking the talk is always important, and we are doing that. We are Whatever promises have been made, we will try to achieve it, number one.

Number two, to give you comfort, advances figure of March '25 was at ₹78,000, which has dropped to ₹71,000. From there, it has started picking up.

Today, we are at ₹78,000 plus. We have got a sanctioned facilities of around ₹4,000 crore.

Even if I take 50% or 75% because there are stages disbursement, all those things are there. Just because sanctioned facilities are there, we cannot disperse.

Around ₹2,500 to ₹3,000 crore disbursement will happen. We are at ₹78,000, as I said.

₹3,000 crore will come from there. Around ₹1,500 crore are coming from gold loan.

Gold loan after September started picking up. ₹1,500 crore, ₹1,800 crore we have added.

Daily growth is happening there. Housing loan, as I told you in my meeting also in the investors meet in Mumbai, this finer rate of interest we have done for housing, retail, MSME, and couple of other areas.

New products also have been added. Taking all those things into account, around ₹3,000 crore are I'm hopeful it will come from there.

₹85,000 crore is my target, and my team is working in all the 15 regional centers as well as head office. Sufficient leads are also there.

In-principle cleared proposals are also there. We are behind the people who have submitted the proposals for in-principle clearance.

All these things are simultaneously happening. With regard to this disbursement, which if it is happening at the fag end of the year, the entire interest income I may not get it in the current quarter, but whatever is sanctioned and happening, this disbursement are happening during the month and in the month next month, definitely it will add to interest income, number one.

Number two, CD ratio, 80% you have said. No doubt, it is a task ahead before us.

One is growing on the asset side, other one is when we are growing equally on the liability side, 80% may not happen. If we keeping the liability side on one side intact, if the asset growth only is happening.

For a bank, we have to grow on both the sides. I'm having assured 80%, somewhere between 76 and 80, I will be there definitely.

I want growth on both the sides because my focus is on CASA. Since I'm focusing on CASA, my overall yield, or what you call, spread, everything, cost controlling because of improvement in CASA, improvement in NIM, NIM has shown improvement as you are observing over Q3 over Q2, Q3 there is improvement.

Further improvement will happen. 1% plus definitely will happen.

That is number three. Number four, cost to income.

Yes, consistent efforts are there to reduce. You're you're seeing based on the Q1, Q2, Q3.

Q4 of last year if you see, it was highest. Continuous efforts are on.

It is improving quarter by quarter. With the increase in the income, definitely cost to income ratio will be very much under control.

I'm hopeful between 55 to 56 at that range it should come if everything goes well. Then provisioning, yes, we are committed and we want to improve this position of PCR.

Continuously, if you are seeing this PCR in last year Q4 of last year, how much? 58, from there it is continuously improving and every time there is an improvement.

We want to have the better financials continuously based on this. We are improving, and it should be possible for us.

Then with regard to technical write-off, total amount recovered from technical write-off is recovery during the Q3, ₹43 crore has been recovered, which is straight away adding to the income. In the Q4 also In the Q4 also, some are some proposals are in the advanced stages where discussions are happening.

I'm quite optimistic between 75 to 80. If it is happening 100, is very good.

75 to 80 it should happen. With that, it will be definitely adding to improving the cost to income ratio and other important ratios also.

With regard to the restructured advances With regard to the restructured advances, there is a continuous improvement. Over March, restructured advances as on March '25 was ₹994 crore and improved to ₹939 crore, further improved to ₹867 crore.

As far as restructured NPA is concerned, it was ₹549 crore as of March '25, ₹411 crore, and further reduced to ₹393 crore. Both put together, out of the total restructured advances of ₹1,544 crore as of March, now it is ₹1,261 crore.

Continuous improvement is happening. I'm quite optimistic that it will further improve.

The upgradation, by collecting that 30%, it will further improve in the restructured portfolio. Then ROA, as I already told you, with this continuous efforts, improvement in the CD ratio, improvement in the cost control through CASA improvement and recovery, this ROA 1% plus by the end of this March, I'm quite optimistic.

I think I have answered all the If I have anything omitted, please sorry. I think whatever I have noted, I have told, Priyank.

Sir, Karnataka replies I've heard who have asked questions. I have a very simple question.

Sir, I take you back four years back when our market cap was 500,000 crore higher than South Indian Bank, 1,000 crore below Karur Vysya Bank, and more or less on par with City Union and other peer banks. If you look at the differentiation, Karur is four times, City Union is two times, South Indian is one and a half times, and even Tamilnad is one and a half times our bank size.

Our asset book, advances to all other ratios is not reflecting something has gone right in recent years. I understand there's a management change.

When do I see that slumber is over where the Team Karnataka is over? I understand, sir, you've come interim, but I expect if you can talk on behalf of the team.

Good evening, Sunil Choksi ji. Thank you for coming online.

Thank you for your seeking clarification also. Yes, you are right.

Market cap is one thing, which if the financials are really good, market cap will automatically go up. This is coupled with so many reasons.

One is poor CD ratio or poor interest income, net interest income, return on this NPA under control, all these things ultimately adding value to the earning of the bank. That is why in the first meeting itself, I told you and all other my investor colleagues or friends, whosoever who are very very well supporting us, taking into account the long-term interest of the organization.

I was telling that unless and until we improve in the quality of advances and the loan book or the CD ratio if it is not less than 80%, around 9 to 10 ratios will go bad. I started focusing from there onwards immediately after taking over charge.

As you rightly observed, all these strategies coming into effect post October only. The refining of rate of interest, delegation of powers to the retail centers in the respective 15 regional officers, number two, retail focus attention in all these 15 centers, all these started yielding result now.

Therefore, the CD ratio started showing improvement. The focus attention till Q2, whatever we call RAM, everywhere the figures were red, rather negative.

The figures as of 31st March over 31st March in September everywhere there was red is highlighting. Today I'm seeing green.

Going forward, green light will be there, no doubt about it, because I'm optimistic and quite confident my team is working very hard in the head office also, in all 15 regional centers also with regard to the growth of credit, number one. Number two, like this growth, my team, CASA team and TPP team are working across India focusing on onboarding fresh customers and going forward, which will add benefit with regard to the better pricing, cost control.

These two are also happening. Number three, my CRMD team at head office, they are in touch with the borrowers, particularly bigger advances.

They go to the field, they understand the customer. Sometimes though they are from CRMD, they on their visit, they visit other borrowers also, market potential.

They encash that benefit also. Likewise, CRMT team is there in the regional office.

They also started working by visiting to the field. Last but not the least, ARMBs in all centers, this are targeting recovery of NPA.

That is why I was very much optimistic in the Q3 as far as NPA is concerned. You must have seen our past Q1 and Q2, it was improving.

Suddenly one particular account, as I mentioned, has swallowed all our efforts of recovery under other area. That also I'm quite confident, as I mentioned earlier, it is a very good asset in the prime location.

Therefore, I'm quite confident that recovery is happening there also. Once it is happening, this reversed unrealized interest also will be coming back to the income.

With all these things, the NIM will improve, ROE improve, everything will improve. Along with that, when the earnings are good, market cap also will improve.

Whether disconnected? Can I continue?

Yeah. Along with that, you said how when I see this bright day ahead.

Yes, it is a effort, continuous effort required. With that, definitely we have lost ground with comparable other banks.

We will be bouncing back and at the earliest possible time. I cannot commit you right now.

Once this Q4 is over, I will have a proper strategy how to do it. When I can, I will definitely come back to you.

Thank you very much.

Thanks for the opportunity, sir. I have three questions.

Basically first is from the leadership standpoint. Do you believe the management and the key functional teams are now in place or there are areas where additional talent or restructuring is required?

That's question number one. Question number two is in terms of your key focus areas, what are your key focus areas as you look to drive the execution over the next couple of quarters?

Third is in terms of the key challenges that you are facing at the moment as you basically focus to deliver the stated guidance. Stability, management stability, focus areas, and challenges are the three questions if you can answer.

Thanks.

Yeah. Good evening.

Regarding management stability, I feel and I have clarified also. Yes, why you are asking that question also, I am fully aware.

Earlier also, I have clarified. With regard to the leadership, there is no problem because I have clarified in the earlier concall also, in our one-to-one meeting also.

Even earlier when there was change in the management, they were sufficiently backed by a equal capacity or skilled people as a second line. It was there.

Continuous you have seen some changes have happened during the current year also in the key position that were all replaced. With the equal number of talent and results started coming in.

That is, I'm confident there is no threat. I guarantee.

Absolutely, there is no problem. Sufficient backup is there.

It is going on well. Regarding focus area, as I told you earlier, and again I'm repeating, the retail mid-corporates, retail everything, MSME, housing, and gold loan.

Added to that, mid-corporate where diversified risk is there, diversification is there, focused attention is there, yield is slightly better, somewhat collaterals are available. Taking that into account, mid-corporates.

I, as I told you earlier, this corporates where the yield is less and risk is also more without collateral and all. Very carefully, bank is after analyzing so many things, rating, very carefully we are taking the exposure there.

Focus is again mid-corporates and retail. With that, growth is happening.

I think if you have gone through the presentation which you have made available to you all, the growth started happening. Continuous inflow in all this retail 15 centers as well as higher ticket advances, it is coming to head office.

Fortunately, one more analysis I have seen the ticket size also has gone up, both in housing, then mid-corporates, everywhere ticket size has gone up. I'm quite optimistic taking all these things into account that this retail and gold and mid-corporate, the growth will come in the remaining period or in the immediately next because of our strong marketing team which is working in the ground.

All this will add value. Secondly, some understanding with tobacco corporation, some major tie-up breakthrough has happened.

There also we are focusing our advances. All this ultimately, small efforts will turn out big.

I'm quite confident that also will happen. Then challenges, as you asked, as every banker is having, we are also having.

One is competition. With our improved TAT, we have to make it.

We cannot ignore compliance and quality in the advances. We have taken adequate steps.

When retail is growing, the follow-up action also need to be improved. For that, concurrent auditors are also have placed in all the 15 centers, even in head office also.

All these collective efforts put together, challenges have been met with mitigating factors. I'm quite sure that all this will produce best results going forward.

Hi, can you hear me?

Yeah.

Just wanted some guidance on what do you see as longer-term growth and ROA targets. I know that your immediate urgencies to get to something like ₹84,000, ₹85,000 crore balance sheet end of this financial year and a 1% plus ROA.

Say if we were to look at slightly longer-term, '27, '28, what kind of growth rate do you think you can sustain in your assets, and what kind of ROA would you target on a slightly more longer-term basis?

Good evening, Mr. Piyush.

As I was mentioning earlier also, I am still stand by whatever I have committed earlier. One is I have to focus on overall growth of 15% business.

15% business means I am focusing for growth in advances between 15% to 20% and growth in liabilities between 10% to 15%. Overall growth will produce around 15% business.

I want to commit going forward as a long-term plan. Immediate, as I told you earlier, my immediate target is Q4 because the actual business started happening from Q3 beginning only.

Long-term plan, since you asked, I'm telling you, overall growth in business is around 15%. This I mentioned earlier, ROA of 1% plus.

If you ask me 1% plus what means, immediately my plan of 31st March, it should be 1% plus. Going forward, next year 1.1% to 1.2%, third year 1.2% to 1.3%.

It is a step towards like this. Spread also 3% plus immediate.

Going forward, I have to further improve depending upon so many other factors, growth, challenges. All these things come into picture.

Taking all these things into account, my immediate plan of action is like this. I am moving in this direction.

Immediately, next month again I will revise that. Revise in the sense strategies and other things, marketing, everything I will plan.

By the end of March, the picture will be very clear. Based on that, I will work further to improve all these strategies.

Yeah. Thank you all the gentlemen who have come online and wanted to know so many things.

Thank you for the opportunity also to me to interact with you. I will be more often interacting with you.

I'm assuring you that I will be interested to discuss with you in person also whenever I'm in Mumbai or elsewhere wherever it is convenient, number one. Number two, it is a commitment from my side that whatever some gentlemen has told, walking the talk, we always do that.

We are committed to that. What best service is also possible.

All these things ultimately will produce the best result to the bank and increasing the value of our stakeholders also. Thank you very much, one and all.