Thanks, Inba. Good day, everyone, and welcome to LTIMindtree’s Q3 FY26 earnings conference call.

Today, we have with us on the call Mr. Venu Lambu, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director, and Mr.

Vipul Chandra, Chief Financial Officer. We’ll begin with a brief overview of the company’s Q3 FY26 performance, after which we will open the floor for questions and answers.

During the call, we could make forward-looking statements. These statements consider the environment as we see today and carry risks, uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in today’s call.

We do not undertake to update any forward-looking statements made on this call. I turn the call over to Mr.

Venu for his opening remarks. Over to you, Venu.

Thank you, Vikas. Hello, everyone, and wishing you and your families a Happy New Year.

Thank you for joining us in FY26. We accelerated our journey towards becoming an AI-ready organization, capped by our Blueverse ecosystem, sales transformation program, a sharper focus on large deals, and redefining partnerships.

These initiatives have yielded tangible outcomes, strengthening our ability to deliver new-edge capabilities at scale, consistently win in the market, and create greater value for our clients. The progress we have made across this initiative is reflected in our strong Q3 FY26 performance.

We reported revenues of US dollar 1.21 billion, reflecting a sequential growth of 2.4 percent in US dollar terms and similar growth in constant currency. Operational EBIT margins expanded by 20 basis points from 15.9 percent in Q2 to 16.1 percent in Q3.

PAT grew 29 percent year on year before adjusting for the labor code impact. Our order inflows stood at US dollar 1.7 billion, up 6.4 percent quarter on quarter.

This quarter, we continue to win significant deals. Let me highlight a few.

We’ve been selected as a strategic partner by a leading U.S. insurance and financial services company for a multi-year engagement covering application management, infrastructure operations, and end-user services, driven by an AI-led delivery model.

This is a U.S. dollar 155 million total contract value for a five-year term.

We’ve been selected by a leading manufacturer to consolidate its technology landscape with a multi-year agreement that spans applications, cloud, infrastructure, cybersecurity, data, and AI services. We have been selected by a global financial institution to deliver end-to-end technology and consulting services across all lines of business, positioning us as one of their five major service partners.

We have partnered with a global technology company to deploy AI solutions that enable a safe and secure customer experience across one of the world’s largest planet-scale app ecosystem. We have been chosen by two clients, a global manufacturer and a multinational imaging company, to deploy our Blueverse platform as a foundation for AI agents to enhance efficiency across their business operations.

We have been selected as a transformation partner by a UK-headquartered food and beverage company, leveraging our AI capabilities to simplify infrastructure and application complexities, managing operational risk, and drive business efficiency. We have been selected by a global AI leader to deploy AI agents for its learning and development platform.

Together, these deals demonstrate our ability to combine innovation, scalable delivery, and deep domain expertise to drive long-term value for our clients. Let me now share updates on our vertical and geography performance in U.S.

dollar terms. In a seasonally weak quarter, typically impacted by furloughs and holidays, our sequential performance was as follows: Consumer business experienced a growth of 1.2 percent, BFSI declined by 0.7 percent, manufacturing and resources reported a growth of 9.4 percent, tech, media, and communication was flat, healthcare, life science, and public services grew at 9.9 percent.

From a geography perspective, Americas grew by 0.4 percent, Europe by 3.4 percent, and the rest of the world by 14.1 percent sequentially. At the end of Q3, the total headcount stood at 87,958, with net additions of 1,511, including 1,736 freshers, reinforcing our commitment to building future-ready talent at scale.

We continue to be recognized by the industry leaders and partners. This quarter we received several recognitions.

We have been recognized as a Leader and Star Performer in Everest Group’s Banking IT Services PEAK Matrix Assessment 2025. We have been recognized as an Innovator in Avasant’s Generative AI Services 2025 RadarView.

We received two partner awards at AWS re:Invent 2025: Application Modernization Consulting Partner of the Year and Industry Partner of the Year, Travel and Hospitality. We have been accredited as a Microsoft Fabric and Real-Time Intelligence SI Partner, which further strengthens our AI capabilities.

We have been recognized as one of the Financial Times’ Best Employers in Asia Pacific 2026, reflecting our dedication to a forward-thinking and inclusive workplace where employees excel. We won the Golden Peacock Award for Risk Management 2025, highlighting our commitment to strong governance and risk management practices.

Please refer to our fact sheet for a complete list of our recognitions. Let me now take you through some key business updates.

In parallel to driving growth of the year, we’ve been focusing on defining our way forward strategy as part of our Group’s Lakshya 2031 initiative, the details of which will be shared at the next available opportunity. Our industry is at an inflection point, marked by significant reimagination of capabilities, redefined operating models, the convergence of technology and domain expertise, and most importantly evolving client expectations, all unfolding at a relentless pace.

We are reimagining our service lines with clear focus on AI ops and integrated transformation capabilities. This reimagination is centered on connecting discrete capabilities to modernize and scale data and systems while accelerating AI adoption in the enterprise agentic era.

In parallel, through our Business AI services, we are unlocking new productivity paradigms across business operations by combining our Blueverse ecosystem with deep domain expertise. This will be championed by repositioning our brand from being a technology-only partner to a business creative partner for our clients.

From an execution standpoint, our Fit for Future has delivered on its stated objectives over the past three quarters. As we move into FY27 and look beyond, we remain committed to addressing the next phase of our growth and cost agendas.

To this end, we are launching a New Horizons, a comprehensive enterprise-wide program to drive our transformation agenda over the medium to long term. This quarter, we made significant progress across AI-driven solutions, transformation, partnerships, and talent development.

Here are some of the key ones that I would like to talk about. We launched Blueverse with organizational general intelligence and next-generation agentic IT service management platform designed to autonomously manage and resolve complex IT operations.

We are building AI factories by industry and at scale, creating Blueverse industry blueprints to help our customers adopt agentic AI at speed, supported by our right-action governance framework. We have been selected by a top American real estate firm to redesign their workflow and deploy GenAI agents for unstructured tasks, managed through a single interface.

This approach will speed up deal processing, minimize manual work, and enable their agents to focus more on valuable client interactions. We have partnered with a diversified to enable critical data elements extraction from their existing contracts.

We have been selected by a U.S. onshore oil and gas provider to deploy an AI system with multiple autonomous agents for automating field operations.

We launched Agentic AI SDLC solutions and industry-specific solution for our TTH vertical on the AWS Agentic marketplace. We have been extending the capabilities of our Blueverse Craft studio to enhance the creator ecosystem through AI technologies.

As a part of this effort, we partnered with International Film Festival of India to define a new era of AI-led storytelling in cinema. We secured an important patent for Blueverse Knowledge Fabric, enabling faster software delivery, improved SDLC efficiency, and smarter collaborative insights.

We announced a partnership with Armada.ai to accelerate the adoption of edge AI for industry sovereign and federated learning. We launched Edge Agility, an integrated offering for digital transformation, seamlessly connecting IT, OT, and ET, while standardizing the design, deployment, and operations of edge environments.

We launched Transistor, an automation engine enabling enterprises to migrate KPIs, models, and pipelines to Oracle AI data platform to unlock value and amplify outcomes through a network of AI agents. We launched our MediaCube offering, an integrated AI-driven media and marketing platform that helps enterprises plan, monitor, and optimize media across channels.

Our people remain at the heart of our strategy and performance. We continue to invest in attracting, retaining, and upskilling talent in line with evolving client demand and our long-term business priorities.

Building on this commitment, we strengthened AI-focused learning journeys across the organization, with more than 50 percent of our employees achieving 80-day Oracle AI skills. In parallel, recognizing that industry domain expertise is critical to our tech domain convergence strategy, over 70 percent of workforce is now covered under tech domain skilling across various competency levels.

In summary, our AI strategy, grounded in AI inclusion and AI-native pivots, continues to drive transformational outcomes and strengthen our positioning as a business creativity partner in building agentic enterprises. With that, I will hand over to Vipul for financial updates.

Thanks, Venu. Hello everyone, and thank you for joining the call.

Firstly, I would like to wish everyone a Happy New Year. Let me now walk you through the financial highlights for the third quarter of FY26, starting with our revenue performance.

Our Q3 revenue stood at USD 1208 million, reflecting a growth of 2.4 percent quarter-on-quarter and 6.1 percent year-on-year in dollar terms. The corresponding constant currency growth was 2.4 percent quarter-on-quarter and 5.2 percent year-on-year.

The revenue in INR stood at 10,781 crores, which is a growth of 3.7 percent quarter-on-quarter and 11.6 percent year-on-year. Q3 operating EBITDA margin expanded by 20 basis points sequentially to 16.1 percent.

This increase was primarily driven by our margin improvement program as part of the Fit for Future initiative and by a positive forex tailwind during the quarter. These gains were partly offset by lower workplace and furloughs in this quarter.

The margins had a one-time impact on account of a change in the labor code, amounting to rupees 590 crores or dollars 66 million. Adjusted profit after tax for the quarter stood at rupees 1,401 crores, as compared to rupees 1,381 crores in the previous quarter, registering a growth of 1.5 percent quarter-on-quarter and 29 percent on a year-on-year basis.

The PAT, after taking the above impact of labor code, stood at rupees 959 crores. The effective tax rate for the quarter was 26.5 percent, unchanged from quarter two.

Basic EPS, given the one-time impact, was rupees 32.8 for the quarter, as compared to rupees 47.3 in Q2 FY26. Our total DSO for Q3 stood at 85 days versus 82 days last quarter.

The operating cash flow to PAT was 129.9 percent, up from 85.6 percent in Q2. Free cash flow to PAT ratio stood at 112.8 percent compared to 72.4 percent in Q2.

Cash and investment balances stood at USD 1.62 billion, or rupees 14,558 crores, compared to rupees 14,000 crores in Q2 FY26. Return on capital employed for the quarter was 29 percent against 27.5 percent last quarter.

As of December 31, 2025, our cash flow hedges stood at USD 3.97 billion and hedges on the balance sheet were USD 407 million. Our utilization, excluding trainees, declined to 86.9 percent in the quarter compared to 88.1 percent in Q2.

For the quarter, our trailing 12-month attrition decreased to 13.8 percent from 14.2 percent in Q2. On the ESG front, we achieved an exceptionally high results score of 4.6 out of 5, which is far above the industry average and one of the most trusted ESG benchmarks used by global investors.

In addition, with a score of 71 out of 100, we secured a top EcoVadis ranking, placing us in the top 8 percent of the companies globally in our sector. We achieved recognition in the top 1 percent globally for the environment theme, as well as ranking within the top 3 percent for both social sustainable supply chain themes and governance themes.

As a step towards building a sustainable ecosystem, I am pleased to highlight that our Pune, Shivajinagar, Bangalore Global City Phase 1, and Chennai Innovation Campus Tower 1 have received LEED Platinum certification from USGBC, making them part of a select group of sustainable and innovative LEED-certified buildings. I now hand it back to Venu for the business outlook.

Thank you, Vipul. I hope I am audible.

Thank you. Thank you, Vipul.

As we look ahead, we expect the growth momentum delivered over the last three quarters to continue through the balance of the year. This confidence is supported by our execution discipline, improved deal momentum, and the traction we are seeing across our AI-led offerings.

In parallel, we are preparing for the next phase of our growth journey in FY27 and beyond. This will be anchored in a strategic repositioning of the brand, sharpening our ability to compete more effectively in the marketplace and deliver tangible outcomes for our clients.

With that, I would like to open the floor for questions.

Hi, thanks for taking my question, and congrats on a solid performance in a seasonally weak quarter. I had a couple of questions.

One is we’ve seen very strong growth momentum over the past three quarters, and as you had mentioned that you expect that to continue. I think last quarter we had mentioned that at some point of time we would hope to touch double-digit Y-on-Y growth rate in this year.

With the current numbers, do you think we are still targeting for that in Q4? The second question on the growth part is our top five client bucket declined this quarter as well after the last quarter.

Any color on that as to what exactly is driving that? When do you think this decline in the top five clients could actually bottom out?

Then I'll have just one small follow-up for Vipul.

All right, Vipul, thank you. Happy New Year to you.

Firstly, on the first question, look, we delivered 6.1% year-on-year growth this quarter. That means we are getting better with every quarter on a year-on-year growth terms.

The plan that we have coming close, that hasn't changed. That's still the plan.

I do feel that we are within the reaching distance. There’s nothing extra that I can add except to tell you that we want to deliver to that near double-digit as we go into the Q4.

With regard to the top five customers decline, look, I think if you recall last time, Vipul, I had spoken about the productivity journey of customers. Every customer goes through its productivity journey because nobody is sitting quiet when it comes to what can be done on AI of the existing book of business.

That is what we are helping customers proactively in going through that journey. If you look at the top five, are the really material accounts with a sizable revenue.

Unless all the five clients complete their journey, we will have to live through this short-term decline in that bucket. What is most important is that, are we balancing our portfolio?

The answer is yes. Are we growing as a company?

Yes, we are growing. Are we continuing to commit that we’ll continue to grow?

Yes. Right.

Hence I wouldn’t read too much into it. It’s a phase, we have to go through it.

The good news is that I do feel that in the top five client, probably just about one client that is left now that needs to pass through that phase. That may take more time than the remaining four accounts, which seems to have already transitioned reasonably on that journey.

Next quarter I expect one out of that five account will eventually bottom out, and then out of that bucket decline approach. To be honest, I’m not unduly worried about it.

It’s a journey we have to go through. We know what we’re doing in that bracket.

Great to hear that, Venu. Just one my follow-up question for Vipul.

Sir, I think margins are very strong performance in this quarter. Just two things on that part.

Have we decided as to when are we going to give the wage hike for this year, if there’s some color on that? Secondly, beyond the margins that we have reported in this quarter, do you think there’s still a lot of juice left in the Fit for Future program, and margins from here levels also can probably be expanded with the operational efficiency that you are planning to?

Sure, Vipul. In terms of the wage hike timeline, I think in the last quarter itself we had spoken about it, and we had said that we will be starting the wage hikes from Q4.

Instead of doing it in one go, we’ll be probably spreading it out over a couple of quarters. That plan remains intact, and we will be taking up wage hike for about 50% of our population in Q4.

As to the second question, whether there is still juice left in Fit for Future, I think the answer to that is that cost discipline and margin improvement initiatives are a constant initiative that has to be there in the company. To that extent, that is the journey that we will continue to drive on.

Whether there is juice left in Fit for Future, I think the answer to that is that we are looking at sunsetting the Fit for Future program and replacing it with a more balanced transformative program called New Horizon, which focuses in equal measure on growth as well as cost discipline. In a nutshell, we believe that there is still more juice left in terms of driving the cost efficiencies, and as we go through a journey in the next year, this effort will continue and we’ll continue to improve our margins on operational front.

Got it. Thank you, sir.

Thank you so much for taking my questions and wish you all the best.

Hi. Am I audible?

Thanks for taking my question. My first question is on the deal wins.

Venu, just wanted to check on the construct of the deal wins that we’ve had over the last few quarters. Just wanted some color around how has the mix of renewals versus the new deal wins has been there in the last three quarters versus the last year?

Any change in the tenure that you would have seen, during this time frame?

Thank you, Sulabh. Look, I think the deal mix is, traditionally if you had looked at a couple of years back, renewal was a renewal, probably to come with a little bit of an incremental scope.

I think the clients are looking at the renewal as an inflection point where they want to reimagine their partner ecosystem or they want to reimagine their vendor ecosystem. For us, renewal is not just a transactional renewal.

Now it has become very strategic because it leads to taking over the wallet share of other companies in that particular account. You see that in the pattern of the last deal that we announced.

Most of them are actually taking the wallet share of other competitors, except, most of them actually. There’s nothing exception except anything we announced in the public sector part, it’s different.

One second, give me a second, let me just adjust the mic quickly.

is this better?

Much better.

Just let me know. Probably I was talking in the wrong mic, I guess.

It’s much better now.

Thank you, Sulabh. You got it actually?

Do you want me to repeat the mix of the deal part?

No, I understood you mentioned that you’ve been winning wallet share in the deals that have been panning out. Yeah.

With regard to the tenure, there is no change. We pretty much look at an average of three to five years contract cycle.

Understood, sir, understood. The second bit is that in the last few quarters the run rate of growth that we’ve seen, which is let’s say in the range of 2 to 2 and a half percent?

If you were to think about delivering something similar going forward, do you think that you need to inch up the deal win TCV run rate that we have been winning, or even these levels would you be comfortable to deliver that run rate, given that there is some improving ramp-up on the deals, which is timely happening, and leakage has been lower. Any color around that would be very helpful.

No, absolutely, Sulabh. We need to.

Obviously if you look at it from an FY27 point of view, obviously we’ll grow from whatever is our exit run rate based on Q4. That essentially means that to deliver, an industry-leading growth, that’s our aspiration.

We have to up our order booking. I think we are pretty much getting there.

The most important thing of increasing the size is first to achieve a consistency in the deal closures. If you look at it over the last three quarters, even as recent as last week, we announced large deals.

Increasing the order booking, I think it will be a natural course that will happen as we get into FY27. To some extent, if it gets aided by the market condition, it only helps that much.

Thanks a lot, sir. Thanks for taking my question and all the best for the coming year.

Thank you.

Thank you for the opportunity. I hope I'm audible.

Yep. Just wanted to get your thoughts around the ramp-up plans for some of the large deals that we have won over the course of last couple of quarters, both across media and entertainment and possibly some of the India-driven deals, and if you could help us understand how much of that growth in the current quarter was probably supported by the India-driven deals.

Hi Manik. Look, India deal, we just announced it a couple of days back.

I look at that as a... That's not...

I'm assuming you are looking at it as the PAN deal which we announced in the previous quarter. If the question is related to that, yes.

The ramp-up of PAN deal is reflected in our rest of the world geography. Same thing, the orders that we closed in Q1 and Q2, depending on the transition duration, some customers have a longer duration.

The client that we announced in the second quarter later part, for a large deal, that has a longer timeline. That will go on till Q4 and before it gets into the steady state.

In summary, does these deals ramp-up include? Yes, it does include, but does it include the full ramp-up to the scale?

No, it doesn't include yet.

The second clarification question was with regards to our segmental margin performance. If you could talk about what's driving the improvement in margins within the financial services vertical at a segmental level, and also talk about how should we be thinking about margins in the Hi-Tech vertical where margins have come off through the course of this year?

Sure. In terms of the margin improvement in the BFS vertical, it is on account of our continuing efforts under the Fit for Future program and our infusion of freshers into the accounts.

Pyramid improvement, rate realization, all of these things have played a role, as well as to some extent, foreign exchange benefits. Some things put together.

What was the second part of your question?

My question around the Hi-Tech vertical where we've seen margins come off through the course of this year.

In the Hi-Tech vertical, I think we have spoken about it in the previous quarters also that some of the clients had embarked on their productivity journey in Hi-Tech earlier than other clients. As Venu also mentioned in the context of the top five clients.

Now, the good thing is that in this quarter, if you look at it, the revenue growth has stabilized and even in the margin front, the efforts are continuing in the same direction as in BFS, in terms of improving the pyramid, improving the rate realizations, and also cutting the overheads wherever it is possible. I think overall, if you look at it, our Fit for Future program has delivered an almost 230 basis points improvement over the last nine months, which is significant.

I think the efforts are continuing and segment by segment there could be some peculiarities in different segments and different accounts can be at different stages of their productivity journey. What we are focusing on is more in terms of balancing out the portfolio and making sure that at company level overall, we continue to improve our margins.

The last one from my end, while you've spoken about splitting wage hikes across two quarters, if you could talk about how should we be thinking about the impact of wage hikes through the course of next couple of quarters, and do you think you still have some operational levers to negate some of that impact through the course of these quarters?

If you look at wage hike alone per se, the impact could be up to 1% in each quarter, Q4 and Q1. Coming to the point about whether we'll be able to pick up some of that impact by way of other operational efficiencies, yes, that will be the endeavor, and we are going to continue to work on our New Horizons program to help us do that.

Having said that, I think we do need to be mindful of the fact that next quarter again we have lesser working days than even Q3 and also in terms of the productivity journey, which Venu talked about, those impacts will also have to play out fully. We'll see how it happens, but suffice it to say that we are confident that we'll be able to close the year at better EBIT margins than the previous year.

Great, thank you and all the best for the future.

Hi, can you hear me?

Yes. A couple of questions for Vipul.

Firstly, could you share the pass-through revenues for the quarter, if any? Secondly, SG&A as a percentage of revenue is down almost 100 basis points sequentially, 150 basis points Y-o-Y.

Is there anything to call out here, or is this a more sustainable level going forward?

To answer the first question, Surendra, I don't think we call out the pass-through revenue in exact number terms. Suffice it to say that it's similar to the seasonal impact that we see every year in this quarter.

Some amount of movement up or down can happen, but more or less similar to the previous years. On the SG&A front, I think it's a combination of what I said earlier about the Fit for Future program driving some of the efficiencies, as well as some one-off reversals that we had in this quarter.

To answer your question about a potential level of SG&A to think about, our attempt will be to kind of keep it in the region of around 11 to 11.5 or 11.6% kind of a range. Does that answer the question?

Thanks. Just a follow-up, could you quantify the reversals in this quarter?

Again, that is not the kind of detail that we get into. It's not that material, but it is something which has given us a one-off benefit in this quarter to some extent, apart from the Fit for Future-led productivity benefits.

I've also given you the range for the next, on a long-term basis. That should in a way give you the answer.

Understood. Thank you.

Thank you for the opportunity and congrats on a good quarter. I want to check about this healthcare public services segment margin improvement.

This quarter you said that this includes the PAN contract had started ramping up. Can we assume that since we've seen margin improvement at this contract, is at least not margin dilutive and it's a normal margin contract, even though it's Government of India?

I think, again, healthcare and life sciences and public sector, domain, these are verticals which are very highly driven by the project life cycles that they are going through. It is a bit of a cyclical impact for India, and, the project impact which keeps playing out.

Overall, anyway, what I have said earlier about the Fit for Future program driving the productivity improvement has an impact on this segment as well.

Secondly, your top five customers, there has been slight decline, but we saw that, in your deal wins, there was an announcement that you are now one of the five major sales partners for a global financial services unit. Can we say that there is no, we should worry about any vendor consolidation deals, at least with your major financial services client?

Yes, that's a fair assessment. There is no risk of our business being part of the vendor consolidation.

If not anything, I'm looking this as an opportunity to grab the larger share, a lot of other tail vendors that exist in that account. As I said, the top five, most of them are past through the productivity journey, except one and which will bottom out in Q4, and then I'm really hopeful for a growth-oriented top five story.

Thanks so much, Venu. Best of luck.

Thank you.

Thanks. Can you hear me?

Sandeep. Yeah,

thanks. Thanks for the opportunity.

Sir, you may have answered this in the previous question, but it is fair to assume the top client in Hi-Tech and top client in BFSI, we are not lost any wallet share and unlikely to lose wallet share because of the vendor consolidation?

Look, I think the top client in the Hi-Tech sector went through that productivity journey same time last year, and we were done with it, right? We have grown, sequentially in that client, in the top client, in the top tech account, we have actually grown sequentially.

For me, with regard to the tech top account, it's a story that got over when we told in Q1 that our productivity phase is done and, it's sort of there. With regard to the financial services, I think, as I mentioned, I think Q4 is where the overall BFS will sort of bottom out, and then we have a plan on getting into a much accelerated trajectory.

The good news is that for some of the big global banks in BFS, we are the prime supplier, right? our positioning has got elevated, differently this year, where not just the top BFS client, but all the top five, top seven global banks, we are the prime supplier.

While we navigate the short-term productivity headwinds, long-term, fairly optimistic about the future of that business.

Okay. Anshul, do you believe the trend of productivity gains which you highlighted in a set of top five clients may extend beyond top five, maybe in the coming quarters or coming years, maybe for top 20?

Okay. I'll add it Vipul you please add to it, right?

Look, I think the top 20 is a slightly broader base, right? I'm hoping that with puts and takes, the top 20 should be in the positive trajectory.

It's not fair to say that, okay, we are counting top 20, top 40 has gone through their phase. It's a first year of a productivity journey, as I call it.

I'm more hopeful of that category of accounts actually with puts and takes to continue to deliver growth because we have a good pipeline as well.

I was just adding to this point in the following way, that in the last quarter we had spoken about this journey playing out at different points in time for different clients, and overall to say that all the clients have gone through the journey will probably take a bit longer. As Venu rightly said, that impact is more felt in the top five clients.

The top 20 is a much wider bucket, and there, wherever people have gone through the journey earlier, we would have started growing there. Wherever somebody goes through the journey now, it will have a bit of a negative.

Overall, we expect that bucket to continue to grow for us.

Fair enough. Thanks and all the best.

I hope my voice is audible?

Thank you very much for the opportunity, and congratulations on a good set of numbers in a seasonally weak quarter. Just one question on the impact of the labor code.

What we understand when we compare with respect to the large-cap peers, your labor code impact is higher than the large-cap peers. It's almost 5.5% of the quarterly revenue versus 2.5 to 3% what we have seen for the other large-cap peers.

Is there any reason for that, which it's possible to give a view? What would be the recurring impact of this?

Thank you.

Sushrova, on this one, I think it will be difficult to comment absolutely because we won't know what is the starting point for the other players in the market. Depending upon the starting point of the gap in terms of the new definition of wages versus the way earlier the gratuity impact and leave-in cashment impact was being calculated, there are bound to be differences between different companies in terms of the one-time impact.

The good thing is it's a one-time impact. One quarter is done, and then next quarter onwards we can continue with the rest of the BAU activities.

Now in terms of the recurring impact, it is also going to be something which is going to be dependent upon certain clarifications and certain rules which are expected to come out. Also, we don't expect the impact to be very material.

The exact impact workings we are still going to do or wait to do until after we have got some clarifications, which are expected in the industry.

Look, any impact on that, if it is one or percentage points, will become an across-all companies a little bit. I don't expect, as Vipul said, to be material on the recurring side.

Thanks for the opportunity. Can you hear me?

Okay. A couple of questions.

First about the... I just want to get sense about the demand outlook in three verticals, if you can provide some sense.

Any changes you witness, let's say in last six months, and the growth driver in BFSI, consumer, and Hi-Tech, if you can provide some broad color, how you expect it to play out in calendar 26, from growth perspective, and maybe considering some of the portfolio-related things, if you can provide those color around these three verticals. Second question is about the AI.

You indicated about Project Lakshya and related things, which you said you will share later, which gives slightly medium-term kind of perspective. Is it possible to give some sense about, let's say, how we look overall AI portfolio and any plan to share some number around it?

Thank you.

Sure. Look, Dipesh, thank you for the question.

Look, firstly, I'll put the headlines for all the three, right? It sort of gives you the color of the outlook commentary, right?

BFSI, as I mentioned, bottoming out of the top client, but all other accounts growing faster than the market. Even this quarter, the other accounts have grown much faster than the other accounts.

We'll be done with the bottoming out of the BFSI in Q4 on the top account productivity journey, and then we'll continue to grow as we go into the next year, right? That's...

A lot of things that back up this statement, whether it's capability story, our relationship, and the fact that I said we are the prime supplier for some of the largest global banks. It's not just one or two accounts, right?

For almost seven of the global banks, we are the prime supplier. There is a huge opportunity over there.

The spend pattern hasn't changed. They always continue to be conscious, carefully calibrated spend, and that's what we will go after in BFSI.

With regard to the consumer spend, I think we'll continue to see in the near term we'll continue to keep the momentum. As we go into the next year, more color on Q4, because there are some interesting engagements, conversations that's happening with customers, and I'm hoping some of those things will materialize so that I could be very precise in giving you a color more on that.

Opportunity does look pretty interesting in that space. Hi-Tech, I think, has made a journey from a quarter-to-quarter decline to a quarter where it has been just about a flat, just a flat growth.

It cannot be go up from here on the tech side, right? With regard to the spend pattern, look, materially, fundamentally it has not changed as much as I can call out one or two things.

There are still opportunities out there. We just need to remain focused and bring all our solutions to our customers.

We'll get the growth. Finally, I think on the medium and long term looking, look, when I talk about the next available opportunity, I'm not looking too far away.

Before this year ends, we will look for an opportunity where we come and present you the forward-looking strategy, because it's still a work in progress. We need to take it to the board, and then we'll share it.

I can only tell you that the thought process and aspiration that we have on the plan that we are building is very ambitious.

Understood, and maybe if I can squeeze last question about the, let's say, sustainability of double-digit growth entering into next year. Because by exit we intend to reach closer to double-digit.

Considering overall market dynamics, I am not looking for specific guidance. Just try to understand overall thought process and whether it is possible to deliver considering overall progress what we made so far in terms of our deal funnel, deal closure and client conversations.

Do you think that is likely to be sustained entering into next year?

Look, as I said, our aspirations are big, our ambitions are very strong. You also need to understand that we are living in a bit of a day-to-day variable world, right?

I would prefer to wait for the Q4 earnings, where we can add more specific color for the FY27, right? At the moment, the focus is deliver nearer to the double-digit for this year, and also, as Vipul called out, deliver margin higher than the last year, so that we can sign off in a good way for Q4.

That's what we are hoping for.

Fair point. Thank you.

Hi, thanks for the opportunity and hope you can hear me.

Venu, a question for you. Can you extend your observations about the Hi-Tech customers productivity journey to other customers in verticals?

Also if you can kind of do the customer segmentation, meaning is this trend happening more in the Fortune 100, Fortune 200 customers today? This is more industry-specific rather than company-specific.

Part two of that question is I heard Vipul saying that it could take longer for the other below 20 million customers. Maybe if you can just highlight what is the time frame that we are looking at at this overall productivity journey.

Thank you for taking my question.

Thank you, Abhishek. Look, I think from an industry standpoint, it's a fairly straightforward formula, because to extract the productivity you have to make some investments, right?

It has to be one-time investment. Higher the base, or if the base of that work and the revenue, if it is material, then ROI for the AI investment also, because AI productivity is not a magic wand, right?

We need to redefine the processes, we need to get the right tools in place, right platforms in place, get the team to identify opportunities which can be coded. There is an investment that goes in through an AI tech team, which will create those productivity solutions.

I feel that the larger the account portfolio, it will make more sense, is how I see it. With regard to the rest of the accounts, with regard to, look, it's a very diversified portfolio, whether it's 10 to 20 or 20 to 40, those accounts are a very diversified portfolio.

There are a lot of good pipeline in that accounts, and we have announced deals also in that portfolio. I think we have a good mix in that spend.

I can't generalize such a big portfolio, either it takes shorter or longer. I think account-wise dynamics will play there.

What we are focused is that, as I think I mentioned it, without putting in tech, can we deliver growth? Which is what I said, yes, we are in that direction.

Thank you. Best wishes for the rest of the year.

Thank you.

Hi, can you hear me?

Hi Venu. Just first question for you, Venu.

The first question is that you have the multiples successes in the industry in where you find deals bucketed, and so what's been the unifying theme of success factor, which has helped such multiples, larger deals wins? How does the pipeline for such deals look for Pipeline?

Hi Kawaljeet. Thanks for the question.

Hope you're doing well.

Yeah.

I think that's a great question. What's driving this is, if I look at it, the offering per se, the what part of it, is fairly a point of parity, right?

If I'm doing a big cloud migration or cloud modernization or digital engineering, it's pretty much a point of parity with other companies as well. I think what differentiates us is the how part of it, right?

How do we go about in solutioning? How do we go about in innovating the delivery models?

How do we go about in identifying the team that client finds us as a very strong team? That works for us.

Finally, the innovation that we bring in the commercial model as well. I don't let all secrets open in this call.

In general, the how part is what helped us to win those large deals. I think the very fact that we built a large deal organization, which sort of sleeps and breathes large deal, they see the scenarios more regularly than the team who handles transaction and also does other things.

I think that focus also has helped us.

Noted. How does the pipeline for such deals look like?

It looks decent enough. It looks decent enough for us to close those deals every quarter and keep sharing as we go along.

It has not gone down. Momentarily it'll go down when you close a deal, but then over a period of time it builds up.

It's fairly steady, I would say, Kawaljeet, fairly steady.

Okay. The second question I have for you.

The same question I have for you is that, one of the upsides which LTIMindtree had was those mega-sized accounts, which were the top two accounts. The downside, of course, is that creates brand concentration risk where you are significantly dependent on a single account.

How long do you think would it take for you to have, let's say, a more balanced client portfolio? Do you think you'll have to live with this one to two tier of created by concentration of this?

No, not really. I think the concentration part is going organically, down over the period of few quarters, Kawaljeet.

If you see, same time last year, probably we were in 22 to 23% between two accounts in terms of revenue share. If you look at it now, I don't have the exact percentage off the hand, but it won't be as...

I won't be that wrong if I say 18 to 19% kind of a share. I think the concentration risk is organically going down.

The good news is that we as an organization are growing in, because all the deals that we are announcing is outside of this, outside of this, an obvious account, right? That's, I think we are already in that trajectory.

Let me also add to it, right? We want to grow in every account, whether it's top account, top two account, top five, top 20.

We want to grow every account. There are a lot of headroom for us in various places in our business.

Europe can grow faster, our Middle East joint venture can grow faster, right? Our accounts that I spoke about, seven big global accounts in BFSI sector.

If those accounts grow faster than the top client, we still grow top client, but we still grow the other accounts better. I think we are in a very uniquely well-positioned to get that kind of a mix going on as we get into the next year.

It's a continued journey, a lot of hard work. I can tell you my team is very excited about getting there.

Noted on all the points made. Just one, also, the deal number three mention in your press release, which is positioning us as one of the five major service partners.

Is it the same one, which is the large BFSI account, which has been a top in this?

Sorry,

positioning us as one of the five major service partners?

No. Look, the account which was under discussion, the one which you called out, it was not under discussion at our end, which I have been consistently maintained that from the first quarter as well.

This is a different account. This is part of the Global 7 Global Banks that I spoke about.

Noted. The final question for you, which will, one of few companies which has that consistent and doing policy, and that has worked well.

Given the recent volatility in rates, etc., is there a thought of liability in the long-dated hedges that you carry? In second phase, one is OCI, gain or loss that you're carrying that in these hedges in your book.

Sure, Kawaljeet. Thanks for the question and wish you a Happy New Year.

In terms of the hedging policy, you're right that we follow a very consistent hedging policy, and we are not really looking to change the hedging policy as such. Volatility in a quarter-on-quarter basis in the hedge's performance is not what we look at.

We look at the overall, PAT performance, and that's where we want to maintain the consistency over a period of time. Now coming further on that is that within the hedge policy, there is some amount of flexibility which we have, which allows us to ramp up or ramp down our hedges within a certain band.

That flexibility we use from time to time, depending upon the market conditions. Overall, we are not looking to change our hedging policy per se.

Coming to the second question in terms of OCI, yes, we do have certain mark-to-market losses sitting in the OCI, which will, if the exchange rate remains where it is, which will flow through the P&L. Then the concomitant benefit of that will also flow through in our EBIT numbers.

Overall, I think the hedging policy is serving the purpose that it is supposed to serve.

Noted. What would be the average rate of hedges that will mature in the next 12 months?

Or, let's say, would it be a gain or loss when you compare with the spot? That's my final question in terms of.

Kawaljeet, we don't give the year-by-year breakup of the hedge rates. I think in our fact sheet we have published the hedge rate for the overall hedge portfolio, which stands at, if I remember correctly, 91 point something.

Yeah,

91.29. In terms of the near-term hedges, given our systematic hedging program, some of these hedges which will mature in the next 12 months would have been taken earlier.

Near-term would be probably, near-term would be less than the 91.29, and the longer-term will obviously be higher. Also, I think in terms of the hedge rate or the average impact of that, that could be higher in the near term.

As we keep putting on more hedges as we go along, that impact also keeps getting mitigated, because every quarter that goes by, we keep adding hedges also in the longer term. It is effectively a systematic hedging program, which gives us the benefit of stability of earnings, as well as over a period of time, build up hedge rate, which works out very well in most situations, except in short-term volatility, where sometimes you can have some hedge losses, which are offset by the gains from the EBIT.

Fair enough. Thanks so much and wish you a great 2026.

Thank you.