Thank you. Good morning and good evening.

I welcome all of you to our earnings call for the third quarter of FY2026. We are starting the calendar year on a very positive note.

The third quarter has delivered a strong performance, with most of our targeted market segments contributing meaningfully to our results. Most importantly, deal momentum has remained robust during the quarter.

We recorded our highest quarterly deal bookings in the last five years, our highest deal wins on a last 12 months basis in the last five years, and our largest deal win in Europe in the comms industry. This underscores the strength of our client relationships, the relevance of our capabilities, and our ability to deliver long-term value at scale.

Before moving to our third quarter business performance, I wanted to touch briefly on this mega deal win in Europe. This is a strategic engagement with a leading European telco, one of the largest wins in the company's history, with a total contract value exceeding five hundred million dollars over five years.

This multi-year partnership is about a comprehensive modernization of the client's application across both the CIO and the CTO domains, aimed at accelerating innovation, strengthening digital resilience, and achieving AI-led operational efficiencies, enabled by our deep domain expertise and proven transformation capabilities. This win further strengthens our leadership position within the telecom vertical.

Let me now turn to our business performance for the quarter. Revenue grew 2.7% year-on-year and 1.5% QoQ on a reported basis, and 1.3% YoY and 1.7% QoQ on a constant currency basis, marking our fastest quarterly growth in the last three years.

This performance was driven by a broad-based growth across comms, manufacturing, high-tech, retail, and healthcare. Operating margins expanded by 290 basis points year-on-year to 13.1%, underscoring the progress enabled by our improved operating discipline and the quality of our revenue growth, as we have maintained pricing discipline and enhanced our revenue mix.

The communications vertical grew 4.7% year-on-year during the quarter. We are seeing signs of stability across the U.S., coupled with the stabilization of top client spending.

Europe is expected to move from a phase of stability into a growth phase, supported by the large deal win. We believe the comms vertical is well positioned, be one of our growth verticals as we move into 2027.

BFSI declined 0.8% year-on-year, primarily due to higher-than-normal furloughs during the quarter and the passing of annual productivity gains to the large infrastructure contract in the rest of the world, which impacted revenues. BFSI demand remained favorable.

We continue to make inroads in engaging clients with tailored solution offerings, and we continue to see strong demand across transformation, experience, data analytics, cybersecurity, coupled with AI adoption. We expect BFSI growth to follow a more steady trajectory in the coming quarters as seasonal factors normalize.

Manufacturing continued its strong trajectory this quarter, building on the strong momentum from the previous quarter, with a year-on-year growth of 11.7%. As stated earlier, we are seeing good traction in the aerospace and industrial segments in the U.S, while in Europe growth was supported by the ramp of a large automotive client during the quarter.

The U.S. automotive segment continues to remain in wait-and-watch mode, and we expect demand trends to turn more positive over the medium term.

The high-tech vertical declined 4.6% YoY. However, it showed faster momentum during the quarter.

The QoQ was positive, driven by engineering services, particularly in the semiconductor segment. That said, we expect the high-tech sector to remain volatile as companies continue to operate under cost pressure and exercise caution in their IT spending.

Retail, travel, and logistics continued to perform, delivering also 11.7% year-on-year growth, supported by strong traction in logistics and above-normal seasonality in the BPOs business for retail. On a geographic performance basis, the Americas grew by 2.1% YoY.

Europe delivered a strong growth of 11.2% YoY, supported by the large deal ramp in European auto. Revenue from the ROW declined by 4% YoY, primarily on account of furlough and annual productivity gains.

That said, our priority markets within the rest of the world that we have called out earlier grew 12.9% YoY, reflecting our continued focus on selected markets which should better contribute to growth in the future, as our mix continues to shift. As we shared previously, these priority markets are primarily ANZ, Japan, Singapore, and Indonesia.

We added three 50 million-dollar clients year-on-year, reinforcing the strength and scalability of our client relationships. Additionally, revenue from our 20 million-dollar-plus clients, a key focus area for us, continued to significantly outpace the company average.

The performance underscores our focused approach to scaling strategic clients and deepening long-term partnerships by bringing tailored solutions to clients and applying the distinctive domain expertise of our experienced staff. AI continues to be a growth pillar of our strategy, and we support clients in moving across from the experimentation to the execution phase at scale.

We are seeing AI increasingly embedded across large enterprise engagements, driving business experience, process and operations transformation, IT build and change, as well as IT operations. Client programs are shifting from pilots to scaled multi-year initiatives that are integrated into their operating models.

In line with this, our partnership with Google positions us well to accelerate enterprise adoption of Gemini Enterprise, leveraging Gemini 2.5 multimodal models to drive human-centered innovation and scale AI adoption across global enterprises. We have also signed an MOU with the University of Texas at Dallas for AI-led innovation, skill development, and research.

We will launch our first Makers Lab in the U.S. in Dallas, focusing on pushing the boundaries of AI, data science, Gen AI, agentic AI, quantum computing, cybersecurity, and cognitive network innovation.

Our deal wins this quarter stand at $109.6 million, including the large deals shared earlier. This represents a robust 48% year-on-year growth on an LTM basis.

This strong performance is a testament to the focused investments we have made in strengthening our sales engine, our solution-based go-to-market offerings, and the growing relevance of our AI-enabled capabilities, which are resonating well with clients and contributing meaningfully to these wins. Other notable deal wins include our selection by a global HCM SaaS company to provide implementation and customer support services across their product portfolio.

This engagement leverages Tech Mahindra’s HCM and CX centers of excellence, along with capabilities in AI, automation, solution configuration, and data integration to drive better efficiency, scalability, and innovation, resulting in enhanced customer experience and optimized cost. We were selected by a leading European aerospace manufacturer as a strategic partner to provide support engineering across all aircraft programs.

The service includes an end-to-end capability for aircraft operators and MRO, leveraging Tech Mahindra’s deep expertise in aeronautics and strong delivery capabilities. This collaboration will ensure comprehensive support engineering across all aircraft programs.

We were selected by a leading U.S.-based comms provider to lead its transformation and systems integration initiatives. This strategic engagement focuses on consolidating operations under a single trusted partner, modernizing legacy systems, and reducing technical debt through automation and best practices.

Leveraging Tech Mahindra’s proven delivery excellence and deep expertise, this collaboration will drive cost optimization, accelerate growth, and enable scalable talent deployment through a core flex model. We were selected by a U.S.-based healthcare provider as a strategic partner to lead its enterprise digital transformation.

This engagement includes optimization, simplification, cloud migration, and transformation to a unified tech stack to deliver better experience, cost savings, and business transformation in a managed services environment. Selected by a leading U.S.-based banking institution as a strategic partner to modernize its enterprise-wide payments platform, incorporating real-time rail capabilities across markets, cash management, and wealth management, leveraging Tech Mahindra's COE.

Awards. As I mentioned in my last earnings, we marked our 39th anniversary on the 24th of October 2025 with the launch of our brand refresh.

Since then, the refreshed brand has been well received across key stakeholders and has reinforced our positioning across innovation and AI-led capabilities. Further reinforcing the strength of the brand, we received the Best Brands 2025 Award and the ET Now Best Brands Conclave by ET Edge.

I'm proud that our refreshed brand encapsulates who Tech Mahindra is in the AI era: agile in execution, bold in vision, collaborative in culture, and with clients, and discerning in our decisions. This branding evolution positions us as the future-ready transformation partner enterprises trust to navigate digital reinvention with intelligence and speed.

At its core, our refreshed brand reinforces our promise to help clients scale at speed through AI-led innovation and precision. Last quarter, we successfully concluded the third session of the Global Chess League, reinforcing our commitment to innovation, strategic thinking, and global engagement.

Over time, these efforts support brand equity, talent attraction, and differentiated market presence, creating sustainable value for our shareholders. Tech Mahindra has again been recognized as a global sustainability leader in the S&P Global Dow Jones Sustainability Index.

We have proudly regained our number one position globally in the TSV IT services segment. We have also been included in the prestigious A-list for both the Carbon Disclosure Project Climate Change and the CDP Water Stewardship 2025, a testament to our collective commitment to sustainability, transparency, and environmental stewardship.

As we close, I would like to highlight the launch of our new culture model, Limitless Together, which brings our employee value proposition to life. Limitless Together reflects our belief that when we unite with purpose, support each other, and push boundaries, there is no limit to what we can achieve.

It is more than a phrase; it defines how we work, grow, and succeed as one team. As Margaret Mead had once famously said, Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world.

Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. I believe that this alignment is translating to stronger execution and that each quarter's performance takes us a step closer to our FY27 goals.

We expect to grow higher than the peer average by the end of FY27, while progressing towards a 15% EBIT margin for FY27. The strong quarter reinforces our confidence that we are on the right path and building sustained momentum towards our long-term aspirations.

With that, I hand you over to Rohit to take you through the financial performance.

Thank you, Mohit. Warm welcome to everyone joining us today across geographies.

Turning to our performance for the third quarter for fiscal year 2026, this was a well-rounded quarter, with the majority of our growth engines coming together to deliver a strong set of results. Our revenue for the quarter stood at 1610 million U.S.

dollars, representing a 1.5% sequential growth and a 2.7% year-on-year growth on a reported basis. On a constant currency basis, the revenue increased 1.7% QoQ and 1.3% YoY.

The constant currency growth this quarter was driven by a 1% increase in service revenue and seasonality, net of furloughs, and the remaining contribution was on the back of large-scale execution in European auto, which will normalize in the quarter. In INR terms, revenue was at 14,393 crores, compared to 13,995 crores in the previous quarter, an increase of 2.8% on a sequential basis and 8.3% YoY basis.

For the quarter, our operating profit was 211 million, with operating margin expanding by close to 100 basis points to 13.1%, marking the ninth consecutive quarter of margin expansion. Gross margin this quarter expanded by 120 basis points QoQ, driven by improvement in our fixed-price productivity program and volume growth.

In INR terms, operating profit reached 1,892 crores, representing a robust year-on-year growth of 40.1%. These results reflect disciplined execution, sustained focus on efficiency across the business, while maintaining momentum in top line.

Other income for the quarter, a loss of 2.4 million, primarily on account of forex losses. As of September 30th, our hedge book stood at 1.05 billion, compared to 1.33 billion in the previous quarter.

Based on hedge accounting, the mark-to-market loss for the quarter was close to 0.4 billion, out of which 13.9 million were taken P&L and the loss of 26.3 million went to reserves. Our effective tax rate for the quarter was 25.7%, while the normalized ETR, as we mentioned before, stays close to 27%.

Our profit after tax margin before exceptional items for the quarter was 9.2%, up 80 basis points on a YoY basis. The exceptional item for the quarter relates to one-time provision of 30 million U.S.

dollars in accordance with the new wage code notification. Prudent capital allocation and sharper execution have strengthened our return on capital employed to 26.9%, reflecting a business that is not just growing but growing efficiently.

On a YTD basis, our free cash flow to operational PAT is at 123%. During the quarter, free cash flow was 194 million, driven by strong collection efficiency and continued improvement in our working capital management.

Our DSO decreased four days on a quarter-on-quarter basis, driven by reduction in our unbilled receivables. Our total deal wins in the quarter stood at 1,096 million, reflecting a growth of close to 48% on a last 12-month basis.

The quarterly deal wins this quarter is the highest, as Mohit mentioned, in the last five years. As we move ahead, we remain focused on sustaining our operating rigor, strengthening execution, and delivering our FY27 strategic goals, where we continue to remain on track.

With this, I hand it back Q&A to the moderator. Thank you very much.

Hi, good evening, good afternoon, and thanks for taking my question and good to see overall performance. First question on the BFSI side, which you spoke about, unusual furloughs and productivity pass-through.

What led to this higher-than-usual furloughs? Is there any sub-segment or client-specific factor which drove that?

Also, is the productivity pass-through done entirely for the quarter, or is there something more to come into the next quarter? Yeah.

Thanks, Rakesh. Look, I think if I look at the BFSI perspective, I just want to call out a couple of things, right?

I'll address your specific questions. The first is that our BFSI business is, compared to our own, a little bit small, right?

A small change in a couple of clients tends to get amplified in terms of the percentage numbers. There is, a lot of underlying good news within the BFSI numbers.

What I want to point out is, for instance, we have added up a huge number of a significant number of logos over the past quarter. I just want to call out a couple of them.

For instance, in APJ, we signed up one of the largest Japanese banks. We won a transformation deal in wealth for one of the largest banks in Singapore.

In Europe, we signed up a global preferred supplier list with one of the largest global insurers, and a new MSA and project wins with one of the world's largest private banks, again in Europe. In the Americas, we successfully renewed a long-standing infra network support and transformation contract with an American insurer.

There is a lot of momentum that is happening on the ground. Now in terms of the furloughs that really had a quarter-on-quarter impact in some markets, in Canada, for instance, which is an important market for us, we saw with some of our clients higher furloughs than we had seen in the last year, for instance.

Now this could just be dependent on their project frequency or their own budgeting cycles. As far as the productivity benefit for a large client that we have spoken about, again the productivity stepped down because it's a multi-year contract.

You have to take a step down every year. We don't expect it to spill through into the current quarter, and we expect to get back to our quarter-on-quarter growth trajectory.

I just want to stress that our ambitions for BFSI remain unchanged, and while this quarter has been weak, there is underlying positive movement in terms of client acquisitions and deal activity.

Thanks, Mohit, for that. I was actually going to ask about the same thing on the deal win side as well.

Is it fair to say that your deal win mix for BFSI would be higher than your revenue mix? Especially where you said that you have been winning a lot of new logos.

That's a fair conclusion to make, right? Well,

it's a fair conclusion to make overall, not specifically for this quarter. In this quarter, I would say that our deal wins have tilted more towards telecom and high-tech.

candidly, we have had a lot of significant renewals from a BFSI perspective, which is also very important. For instance, we renewed a long-standing infrastructure contract, as I mentioned, with an American insurer.

In terms of net new, no, that would not be true for this quarter.

Got it. Yeah.

My second question was on the headcount. Sequentially there is some reduction in headcount.

Was that more to manage the productivity pass-through and keep the cost structure under control, or is there something more to that?

I don't think there is any more to that. Look, what I will say is that we have called out from the beginning of this transformation program that one of the places where we see very significant levers to drive transformation is in our fixed-price portfolio, right, which is over half of our revenue.

As we drive productivity into our fixed-price programs, we are obviously releasing a lot of existing talent there, and then rather than hiring fresh talent, we are largely using this pool. Because of the new sort of software infrastructure that we have created within the company, we have much better visibility of our bench and our talent pool than we previously did.

We are applying those to projects, which is why we are also seeing growth, right? We are also growing rather than shrinking.

We have chosen not to backfill the talent that would be leaving. On the one hand, you are getting people freed up from fixed-price projects who are being redeployed, resulting in both margin growth and profit growth.

On the other hand, where there is attrition, we are first choosing to redeploy our existing fixed-price pool. Thanks to our new software infrastructure, we have much better visibility of individual-level talent and where they can be redeployed.

Thanks a lot, Mohit, for that. Have a great day.

I'll fall back in the queue.

Thanks, Rakesh.

Hello, good evening, happy New Year, and congrats on a very strong quarter. Had a couple.

On the telecom deal which you mentioned, is the entire 500 million net new? Because it looks like it'll drive significant growth for Europe next year.

The second is, from a BFSI perspective, how big is payments for us considering all this recent thing around the credit card, what do you call, rates being capped at 10%? Do you think that becomes a headwind for us, or is it not a meaningful part of the portfolio?

Finally, with this large win, in some form does it impact margins as we start executing this, and has this already started executing?

Thanks for those questions. I'll take them one by one.

For telecom, yes, the revenue that we have called out is all net new. While this is an existing customer, the number that we have included in our large deals wins is only the net new component, right?

We have excluded the existing revenue component over here. This large deal, again, has been signed, but we expect the actual delivery of this to start in the first half of the next financial year.

It should start kicking in relatively early in the new financial year. As far as your question on BFSI is concerned, while we do have a very large payments practice, our exposure with the actual issuers is somewhat limited.

A lot of our exposure is to the payment networks, and we don't see it having a sort of a near-term impact. Obviously, this credit card interest rate cap is just now a proposal.

As it follows with actual legislation and then into IT budgets, we'll be able to give a clearer picture. As of now, our exposure is largely to the networks and not to the actual providers.

On the margin impact of the large deals, look, we have always been very clear about the fact that we do not want to do large deals that lose us money. We have continued to stay very disciplined from a pricing and from a profitability perspective.

While obviously large deals involve execution challenges that could dilute margins, we have not upfront signed a money-losing deal. We will not do that.

Perfect. That's very helpful.

Thank you so much and hope the very best.

Thank you.

Hi, Mohit. Congrats on a great set of numbers.

The large deal in European telecom that in itself should add around 1.6% growth if it were to ramp up relatively early in FY27. On a quarterly basis your net new TCV booking was up almost 45%.

In general there is a sense of improvement in the discretionary demand. With these factors in the background, do you now believe reaching high single-digit revenue growth in FY27 is a possibility?

I think maybe I'll just start off and then Mohit will add on the next year visibility as well. On the large deal, I think it's obviously not linear in terms of the way it's going to be happening, and the way Mohit explained it will ramp up through the year, starting, beginning of the financial year.

It'll take time to ramp it up, right? I think it will not be uniform over the five-year period.

The impact on next year revenue is not going to be equal to the 1.6%. It will be lower than that at a company level.

When we look at it, of course it helps us with more visibility for FY27, and we'll have to continue, as I mentioned before, continue to drive similar results over the next couple of quarters to drive more visibility and comfort around revenue. Mohit can add more on FY27 as well.

No, I think, look, it's too early to give a number for FY27, because we also saw what happened last year between Jan and March. On the whole, we are seeing an improvement in the tech spend environment, which is also reflected in our numbers and the peer numbers.

I think more importantly, I'm really delighted about the fact that if I look at our client list, right, and I look at our clients that give us more than 20 million dollars of revenue, we are consistently growing in that pool, and that really reflects why we are so much more confident about our financial performance, because large clients also are our most profitable clients, and there's a huge opportunity to sell multiple service lines there, right. That is one particular great source of confidence for us.

The momentum that we are seeing in our largest client, that are consistently growing faster than the rest of the company. It is when large clients grow consistently slower than the rest of the company that you have to fill up your revenue with mid-market or with higher-risk clients.

This is a huge source of strength for us going forward.

Sure, and my second question is some of your peers started disclosing some AI metrics, which give confidence to investors on how the AI opportunity is panning out. Any quantitative or qualitative metrics you can share on your AI portfolio, which can give us the confidence on the trajectory we are chatting over here?

Actually that's a good question because we were asked this in the media sessions as well. See, the challenge is, right, that either you go very narrow, right, which is, let's say, the revenue that we get from either doing direct AI consulting work, or the money that we get from building models, or either large language models or small language models for our clients, right?

Then you're talking about a very small number. Or you go very extensively, which is to include everything that has to do with delivering productivity, let's say using GitHub Copilot, or clients where you've infused AI, which then comes to almost 100% of the clients.

We have to figure out something which is meaningful. Now over here, because we've given this a lot of thought, we have published a white paper along with Forrester that you may have seen that came out about a week ago, which is about building a new pricing model itself, where the pricing for human labor and the pricing for digital labor is very clearly distinguished, and the pricing for digital labor is then based on token consumption, right?

If we're doing a testing project, there's a certain amount of effort that comes in from human labor, let's say a program, a test lead, or a test analyst, and a certain amount of revenue that comes in from the use of testing-specific or assurance-specific AI, right? We have built that model, we have validated it with Forrester, and we have taken it to a few clients.

As we start winning things there and revenue starts to flow, that could be one great model, because there it's very clear what's coming from digital labor, but until that happens, we'll have to think of some metrics, which will probably be AI infusion for our top 20 clients. I can say with a great deal of assurance that our peers, we're almost at, 100% adoption there, because it is impossible to find a top 1,000 client that does not use AI.

Therefore when we're working with that client, you are not using either your own tooling or their own tooling. I just feel that nobody's really come up with a metric which is candidly credible and auditable.

Fair enough. Maybe a quick last one from my side.

With the deal bookings being very strong for the last four quarters, how do you see the incremental deal pipeline? Is there signs of exhaustion, or is it still good?

I think the deal pipeline still looks pretty good at the start of the year. Obviously these things tend to be lumpy, and if you reflect in Q1 of this year, I had actually, when this question was asked: When are deal wins going to start converting to revenue?

We had said that these deal wins will start converting to revenue from the second half of the year onwards, and as we have closed Q3, you've seen that that is true. I do feel that the deal pipeline is still strong.

It will continue to be lumpy, you may see a quarter-on-quarter fluctuation. Overall, we're happy with the pipeline and our odds of winning these deals.

Thanks, Mohit. All the very best.

Thank you, Sudhir.

Thanks for the opportunity. Mohit, one question around your BPO segment, right?

If you look at over the past three years, the growth there has been very strong when we compare it to the IT services business, and if we look around, there are a lot of concerns around this part of the business generally across the value chain, given the risks around AI. One question is, what has driven growth in here for us, and what do you think are potential risks to this part of the business, given how much the core this has been to our overall growth?

Secondly, on from a profitability perspective, it has been a similar story. What do you think are the...

Maybe I can ask Profitable, and then you can talk about the... Efficient profitability, as we mentioned earlier, right, if you look at the overall trend, we also had some division that we moved BPS, right?

Testing unit at the... They were relatively dilutive, there was a comparative dip there, right?

From there, post the integration, they've been consistently margin. As before, this question, there is the one-time that they had because the pitch segment down, but operating performance is still to improve, and if you exclude that, see that trajectory for BPS to continue over the next.

Yeah. Look, I think I have always been very bullish about our BPS business, for a couple of reasons.

One is we have a really strong leadership team in BPS led by Biren, and at the end of the day, this business is very much based on the quality of your leadership and therefore the solutions that we are able to develop. I think the BPS business is also gained from the application of technology and specific AI and automation that we've been able to infuse because of being a large IT player.

Everything that we're doing from a techM Orion perspective, whether generative AI, or the work that we're doing to build large and small language models, is feeding into the capabilities of our BPS team to become more effective and therefore win deals from pure-play BPO providers, who may not have the set of capabilities, right? We see this very clearly, for instance, when we're pitching against maybe a pure-play BPO for a banking back-office, right, where our ability to be able to show the level of which and generative AI capability far exceeds what a pure-play BPO is able to provide.

I do feel that as long as this business continues to go up the value chain and be able to be more solution-driven rather than purely sort of bumps-on-seats driven, that business will continue to grow. We remain bullish about the long-term possibility of this business.

Biren and team have also entered into new areas where we're able to generate significant revenue. For instance, one of our key capabilities in BPS that is increasingly emerging is our Saffronic capability, right, which is our ability to do, short digital movies and a lot of the work on the animation side that is winning them clients across the world.

The BPS capabilities continue to increase, and we are also driving greater cross-sell between our existing IT and BPS clients.

Got it. Just one question, maybe it was asked earlier and I missed it, but just on the wage hike cycle, a bit, what about if and when we would go to?

Yes,

on the wage hike cycle, look, candidly, with the new labor code having come in, we are studying the implications of that because it has implications on how wages are structured as well, and therefore, how the wage hike would actually play through. This is something that we will continue to examine along with our CHRO Richard Lobo and the rest of the team, and we expect to be able to decide once we have the required inputs, but there is nothing that we can share at this time.

All right. Thank you, Amit.

Great. Can you hear me now?

Great. Hey, you guys had set a target to grow at or above your peers, their average by fiscal 27, and you've now hit that target.

Our data says you beat the peer average by about 1.7 percentage points when you look at organic constant currency growth result. My question is, do you see this as an improved growth position relative to your peers?

It should be sustainable going forward at this point as you are now close to fiscal 27. Thanks.

Thanks, Rod. Look, I think when we had set the plan, it certainly looked like a really ambitious plan because we were at the bottom of the pile in terms of growth.

Therefore setting paths for exceeding the peer average was seen as an aggressive plan, and I'm happy with the progress that we've made over the past two years. What really makes us confident that this is credible is first and foremost the quality of the leadership team that we have assembled.

I believe that we have really built a world-beating team in tech. The second is that we have focused the growth on our largest accounts, right?

Therefore it is stickier because a lot of the growth is coming from selling to service lines to existing clients, to new design capabilities to existing clients, and new AI and data capabilities to existing clients. As I've shared previously, our top accounts, that is accounts with more than $20 million in revenue, are growing significantly higher than the company average.

Therefore there is stickiness because this is not one-off revenue from marginal clients. The third factor that I want to call out is our large deal book, a large and increasing large deal book, also gives us greater visibility of revenue for the future.

We're confident that going into FY27, that we will be able to fully meet our promise of growing faster than our peer average, and then hopefully over time building that momentum. There is a high degree of confidence there.

Great. Then if I could dive further into the comms vertical, especially in light of the large deal win in Europe, can you give us more color on your outlook for that vertical in particular, and how much of your outlook is a function of what's happening in the vertical overall versus your ability to capture share?

Thanks.

Thanks, Rod. Look, I think the comms vertical is very interesting because at the end of the day, it is our largest single vertical, and it is very important that we maintain and grow our relevance in this vertical.

I do feel that for the comms vertical, we have quite a unique proposition because we're the only player that has the IT capabilities, but we also have the network capabilities, and increasingly a lot of the opportunities are emerging on the network side, and we have BPS and software capabilities, right? In Comviva, which is increasingly won a number of Tier 1 clients for our BSS solution, for our marketing analytics solution, we are able to sell that in Europe and the Americas.

First and foremost, I feel that we have, we're really the only player to have a comprehensive and complete portfolio from a comms perspective, IT and BPO, network services and software. That is a winning combination.

In Europe specifically, we see a lot of consolidation opportunities because most of our clients still have a very long tail of partners, and as they consolidate, they did in the mega deal that we referred to earlier, we're getting increased opportunities. We also see a lot of opportunities with the comms sort of technology providers.

In the U.S., we don't see so much of a consolidation opportunity because really the vendor landscape is already significantly consolidated. We are seeing, as opposed to what we were seeing in 23 and 24, a slight loosening of purse string.

I would not break out the champagne yet, but it is a better picture than we saw certainly 18 months ago. In Asia, we see an opportunity really to deploy our software stack at scale.

Again, we've been a couple of consolidation opportunities. For instance, in the early part of this current quarter, we have won a consolidation opportunity for an ASEAN-based telecoms company, which consolidated from N plus vendors to two.

I feel consolidation will drive a lot of growth for us, and the software portfolio that we have, especially with Comviva, which is growing much faster than the rest of the company, is driving that differentiation. That, in a nutshell, is where we are on comms.

No significant increase in overall spend for the sector, but an increase in market share for us, given our unique portfolio offerings and our incumbency for key clients.

Thank you.

Thanks, Rod.

Thanks for the opportunity. Just one question in terms of deal TCV.

I do agree mega deals are lumpy and cannot repeat every quarter, but based on the efforts and the pipeline and the success ratio in terms of winning the deal, Mohit, is it fair to assume on an annual basis we can now achieve 3.5 to 4 billion dollars worth of new business TCV?

It's to make predictions about the future, but yeah, I think it sounds reasonable, Sandeep. We have certainly demonstrated that over the past quarter.

We don't see us going down from what we have accomplished. There will be some up quarters, some sideways quarters, and some down quarters, but the overall trajectory for us has been steadily rising from 300 plus 500 plus to 800 plus to a billion plus this quarter.

From already the LTM for us is three and a half billion if you look at the last 12 months. As you rightly mentioned, the momentum needs to continue, right?

We have to go to the F27 aspiration, what we've articulated two years back, executing that, but as Mohit said, there is lumpiness associated with that, but yeah, that mark needs to be ballpark in that range.

The last question, Rohit, for you in your opening remarks, you called out there are certain one-time or seasonal strength in the revenues. Can you repeat the same where were it?

Is it mostly to do with the BPO in retail in U.S. or also in Pininfarina, which you called out?

There was marginal impact on the retail and BPO, but more around the European auto, which had some deliveries lined up, which will normalize next quarter.

Will this also have a margin headwind in the fourth quarter, or no?

No, it won't have a margin headwind.

Thanks, and all the best.

Hi, thanks for the opportunity, and congrats on a good quarter. Two questions.

The first is on the gross margin expansion: have we reached the peak, or there is still juice to be taken out on the gross margin side? That's first.

Second, Mohit, to you, it seems that we are probably on the favorable side of vendor consolidation plays in telecom. Outside of the furlough impact in this quarter, anything or any reason to believe the same, or in contrast for the financial services space?

If you can give a color in terms of the vendor consolidation deals in the financial services space. Thank you for taking my questions.

Abhishek, I'll probably talk about the margins first, the gross margins. As you look at the first half, right, articulated improvement was predominantly driven by the improvements in the SG&A side, and a lot of the Project Fortius efforts, including consolidation of our portfolio companies and various initiatives that we driven, that led to the margin expansion.

As we discussed about the second half, I clearly articulated that our expansion will be more driven by the gross margins. I think it's a journey that will continue as we move forward, not just for the next quarter, but also for the next year, because all the efforts that we're driving around Fortius will be factored and focused around it, while some impact and improvement will continue in SG&A, but on a relative basis, majority of the improvement will come from gross margin.

On the BFSI question, look, I think vendor consolidation is happening across sectors. It's just that BFSI has longer buying cycle and longer ramp-up cycle.

We don't really have— so for us, the BFSI story really is about, especially in the Americas and about in APJ, is really getting into new clients and then being able to ramp up, which is why I'm very enthused, for instance, I said, by the signing up of one of the largest global banks headquartered in Japan, or winning a transformation deal in Singapore, or our preferred supplier list selection with one of the largest global employers, and the win that with a private bank. We really have to be able to scale up in these accounts.

That is what will give us the growth. Really we're not really such a large incumbent in existing accounts that we have to fear vendor consolidation in the sector.

Super helpful. Thank you for taking my questions, and best wishes for the rest of the year.

Thank you, Abhishek.

Yeah. Hi.

Thanks for taking my question, and congrats on a great all-round performance. Mohit, I have just one question and a couple of questions for Rohit.

I think you mentioned about the very good pipeline that you think is in the vertical. Just wanted to pick your brains on the manufacturing vertical.

How are you seeing that over the next few quarters? We have heard a lot about the weakness in the auto segment, and there are a couple of illusions that we've already seen from the peers that maybe auto sector is showing signs of turnaround, even in about the European auto as well.

How is the outlook in the overall manufacturing vertical, auto and ex-auto? Any color on that will be really helpful.

Look, I think the manufacturing vertical has done exceptionally well this quarter, right, both from a QOQ perspective and a YOY perspective. As Rohit pointed out, there were some sort of seasonal ramps that we saw in European auto, which will not recur in the next quarter.

That's a bit of a headwind for us. Overall, I think U.S.

auto has stabilized, and we should start seeing some growth there over the next few quarters. We continue to build on our strength in aerospace.

We saw one of the large deal wins was in aerospace as well. There will be some volatility because of European auto, candidly, in the next couple of quarters.

On the whole, I feel very comfortable with the manufacturing story that we have built, right? I think the expertise that we have built, the partnerships that we have built with the software providers, the lifts that we're seeing because of the SAP upgrade cycles, that makes me long-term confident about manufacturing.

Also manufacturing with the smart factory of the future, with physical AI, we see a lot of opportunities to build on a truly differentiated story within manufacturing, where we have a natural right to win because of our history and heritage, and also because of the capabilities of the group. Near-term volatility, but, medium to long-term significant opportunities, and that is just also backed up by the performance in the current quarter.

Got it. The pipeline also in the vertical looks good?

Yes. Absolutely.

Great, thanks for answering those questions. Rohit, just a couple of bookkeeping questions.

Typically we have seen in Q4 over the last two years at least we have seen seasonality play into our numbers. We see kind of a 1.5 percent kind of a Q-on-Q decline.

The seasonality will continue this year as well, or do you see the business exchanging and we might not, might or might not see that kind of a seasonality?

Vibhor, the seasonality on revenue for us is more towards Q1, where we do see some impact on the platform, not really Q4. I think the degree of that seasonality has definitely improved over the years.

It's not as much as we anticipated before, but it'll continue. We will see Q1 pressure on seasonality still to happen, but that's not in Q4.

Not in Q4. The last two years decline in Q4 was not a seasonal factor.

It could have been very specific to those quarters.

It was very client and project-specific items. Seasonality for us is typically in Q1.

Got it. Also, if you could just take us through the margin walk for the quarter, 300 basis point margin expansion Q on Q.

Would you be able to give the breakup as to how much we benefited from operational efficiencies, how much from INR depreciation, how much from other factors?

Sure. I think from a currency perspective, the improvement was marginal.

It wasn't a big factor. Most of the improvement that you see is driven by operational improvement.

Volume, of course, is some part of it, around 20 to 30 basis point, is driven by margin, and the rest is driven by Project Fortius, which is all operation improvement, and that's divided into various initiatives, as we called out, between delivery-led growth, pricing improvement, utilization improvement, fixed-price projects that we continue to call out as a big leaper, where we continue to drive automation, embed AI, and keep on driving what Mohit explained, redeploy people internally into new work, and that's why the revenue productivity also keeps on going up, right? The natural, all the projects around Fortius are contributing to that, and that's mostly contributing to the improvement.

Got it. Just one last question for me, just a clarification.

As of now we have not decided on the wage hike for FY26. As of now it has not happened in Q4?

So

it's undecided in terms of when it will happen, and we'll keep on sharing updates with you as we move forward, as Mohit mentioned, as we get more information on the evolution of the labor code, we'll keep you posted on the development, on the timing, etc.

Perfect. Great.

Thanks for taking my questions, and let me share all the best.

Thanks, Vibhor.

Hi. Thanks for the opportunity.

Mohit, I wanted to first understand, in your ambition to grow higher than peer average in FY27, which vertical other than telecom you are confident of to achieve that vision?

Fair enough. Look, if you look at the...

It's not about only next year, right? Because at the end of the day, we're building a company for the long term, and so we want to make sure that we're growing really across verticals.

If you look at our portfolio though, we have seen strong strength in manufacturing on the basis of the solutions that we've created, the capabilities that we have, and the clients that we have. I continue to see growth opportunities there.

If you look at our retail and CPG and travel, transportation, logistics portfolio, that has done extremely well. Honestly, I did not have such high hopes when we started, but under very strong leadership that we've had with Sampath Sargan, and the other side portfolio has done extremely well, and I'm very optimistic, bullish about our opportunities there.

The portfolio that we have in BFSI is really very important because there is a large spend pool. We are creating capabilities, we have continued to hire exceptional quality talent from the market, and I have no doubt that that will be a medium to long-term growth driver for us.

In the long run, I expect all of our verticals to do well, right? We have great capabilities.

In some spaces, like for instance, U.S. payer, it'll take us time to build out capabilities, broader capability set, and a deeper client presence.

The whole, for telco, for manufacturing, for insurance and payments and asset and wealth management, for the design-led capabilities in retail, those capability sets already exist, it should be easier to ramp on that.

Right, Mohit. I guess on your M&M investor day, you also, I think, alluded that once FY27 vision is achieved, we will probably give another three-year FY30 vision.

Can you give any glimpse of that? Will there be any change in strategy, any further acceleration we might see on either order booking or on revenue growth pickup?

I think it's a little bit too early for that. All I can promise you is that it will be attractive and credible in equal measure, our previous plan.

Got it. Thanks, and all the best.

Thanks, Sumeet. Thanks for the support.

Thank you. Over the last 21 months, we have really focused on strengthening the fundamentals of our business, investing in the right capabilities, building scalable platforms, sharpening our go-to-market execution, and creating a resilient operating model.

The results that we see today, including the improved deal bookings, while also delivering margin expansion, are a direct reflection of these efforts. As we look ahead, I'm going to be traveling to Davos to meet with our leaders and with our clients to also get a perspective on how technology is driving deeper interaction across industries, economies, and societies.

Thank you for joining us today. I believe we had an incredible quarter.

Look forward to meeting you again next quarter.