6 cents, grew 22%, also exceeding the high end of our guidance range of $3.02 to $3.04. On a full-year basis, we expanded adjusted operating margins by 100 basis points to 28%, balancing drop-through on the strong revenue performance throughout the year with the reinvestment back into the business to drive long-term growth.

Now for our 2026 outlook. We expect our differentiated financial performance to continue, and are guiding to organic growth of 8.5% to 10% for Q1 and 10% to 11% for the full year.

Our Q1 adjusted EPS guidance is 78 to 80 cents, and our full-year adjusted EPS guidance is $3.43 to $3.49, representing leveraged double-digit EPS growth of 12% to 14%. John will provide more details.

I'll now provide some highlights in Q4 and the '25 results, along with comments on '26 outlook. Regionally, on an operational basis, the US grew 17% in the fourth quarter and 26% on a full-year basis, with exceptional performance across the business units, particularly EP, WATCHMAN, and ICTx.

Operationally, Europe, Middle East, Africa, EMEA grew 5% in Q4 and 3% for the full year. Excluding the impact of the ACURATE discontinuation, full-year EMEA growth would have been high single digits.

EP also grew strong double digits in Q4 as we continue to lead with our ecosystem approach, offering differentiated technologies and comprehensive commercial support. As we look ahead to 2026, we anticipate momentum in EP and WATCHMAN to continue in Europe, and growth to be higher in the second half of the year once the impact of the ACURATE discontinuation is annualized.

Now the Asia-Pac region: it grew 15% operationally in Q4 and 14% for the full year, led by mid-teens growth across Japan and China. Japan's growth in the quarter was driven by WATCHMAN and EP, fueled by OPAL mapping system placements and increased FARAPULSE catheter utilization, where we continue to gain share.

China had another quarter of double-digit growth, driven by EP, WATCHMAN, and ICTx. We expect EP momentum to continue into 2026, supported by our recent NMPA approval of our FARAWAVE NAV device, as well as indication expansion into the persistent AF population.

Now some commentary on our business units. Fourth-quarter Urology sales grew 13% operationally and 3% organic on a full-year basis—and on a full-year basis grew 23% operationally and 5% organically.

Our performance in Euro this year was below our expectations, and we expect that our overall business will return to market growth in '26, with supply chain issues behind us, new product launches, and the strengthening of our sacral neuromodulation franchise. We look forward to expanding our pelvic health portfolio with the recently announced acquisition of Valencia, which is expected to close in the first half of '26.

Endoscopy delivered organic growth of 8% in both Q4 and for the full year, and delivered a very strong year. Q4 growth was driven by our endoluminal surgery, imaging systems, and endobariatrics franchises, with the latter receiving positive reimbursement support for ESG procedures.

In December, we initiated a product removal for certain sizes of our AXIOS device due to a manufacturing variation. We do understand the issue and are working to bring these unique devices back to market in full by midyear, and anticipate lower Endo growth in the first half of the year as a result.

Neuromodulation had an excellent quarter, growing 10% in Q4 and delivering 8% organic growth for the full year. Our Brain franchise grew low double digits on a full-year basis, led by the Cartesia X and Vercise Genus 3D offerings, providing the full benefit of directional stimulation, also improving efficiency and programming time.

The Pain franchise continues to strengthen and grew high single digits on a full-year basis. This strong growth is a result of a deliberate strategy to expand our pain portfolio to bring options to the physicians, patients, and hospitals we serve.

This is further strengthened by the close of the Nalu acquisition, adding peripheral nerve stimulation, PNS, to our portfolio. Within the quarter, we received expanded reimbursement coverage for the Intracept procedure, and initiated full market launch of the Intracept Access Stylet, designed to improve the treatment experience.

Our Cardiovascular segment delivered 16% growth operationally and organic in fourth quarter, and 22% operationally and 21% organic on a full-year basis. In January, we announced agreement to acquire Penumbra, which is expected to close in '26.

Penumbra offers a highly differentiated portfolio that operates in high-growth segments where Boston Scientific lacks offerings, including mechanical thrombectomy and neurovascular. The deal is both strategically and financially attractive to Boston Scientific, and delivers significant value to patients and customers globally.

Within Cardiovascular, Interventional Cardiology Therapies sales grew 10% in Q4 and 8% on a full-year basis. We're very proud of the Coronary Therapies franchise, delivering double-digit growth in both the quarter and full year, as we have shifted our underlying business to high-growth markets.

AGENT DCB has been a standout performer all year with its differentiated clinical benefit and reimbursement support, lifting our drug-eluting technology growth to over 20% on a full-year basis. We continue to make progress in other areas of the portfolio, and we're pleased to have completed enrollment in the FRACTURE trial studying our Seismic IVL system.

We anticipate presenting data from this trial later this year and continue to expect this differentiated technology in the first half of 2027. In Q4, we did reorganize the reporting structure of our peripheral interventions divisions, and we've aligned the Peripheral Vascular business led by Cat Jennings with Interventional Cardiology Therapies to amplify both commercial and R&D opportunities across similar technologies while retaining customer call point focus.

This new business unit will now be called Interventional Cardiology and Vascular Therapies. Interventional Oncology and Embolization will continue to be led by Peter Pattison as a standalone business, and this structure will enable focus on this broad and unique portfolio.

The Peripheral Vascular business grew 6% organically in Q4, with operational growth of 15%. Arterial growth in Q4 was driven by double-digit performance in TCAR, supported by the recent launch of ENROUTE in China.

Within the quarter, we completed our first cases in the US with our Seismic IVL system. We're excited to add this differentiated and complementary technology to our portfolio, and expect to expand our indication to include below the knee in the second half of the year.

In Venous, low double-digit fourth-quarter growth was driven by continued strength in Varithena and EKOS. We're pleased to have the HI-PEITHO, our clinical study studying EKOS versus standard-of-care anticoagulants, accepted as a late-breaker at ACC, to be presented on Saturday, March 28.

Our Interventional Oncology and Embolization business grew 17% operationally and 12% organically in Q4, and achieved nearly $1 billion of full-year '25 sales, operational growth of 16% and organic of 12%. Q4 organic growth was driven by our category-leading embolization and cancer therapies portfolio, with ongoing strength in cryoablation, which treats a broad number of cancer types.

As we look ahead, we expect to continue to outpace the underlying market growth, supported by new product offerings such as TheraSphere 360 Y-90 management platform, which is a web-based platform to simplify the entire process for patients and physicians. Cardiac Rhythm Management sales grew 1% organically in both Q4 and for the full year '25.

On a full-year basis, our Diagnostics franchise grew high single digits and now represents nearly 20% of our overall CRM business. In core CRM, our high-voltage business grew low single digits, and our low-voltage business was flat in the quarter.

We continue to see demand for our conduction system pacing offerings, and in Q4, we began enrollment in the SYNCHRONICITY trial, evaluating left bundle branch pacing compared to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy. As we look to 2026, we anticipate that our growth will be closer to market in CRM over the course of the year, driven by the addition of our complementary bioenvelope and ongoing momentum within our Diagnostics business.

Our WATCHMAN business delivered an outstanding 29% growth in Q4 and on a full-year basis, exiting the year with strong double-digit growth across all major global markets. We are extremely pleased with the performance of this franchise, with above-market growth driven by the strong adoption of concomitant procedures.

We have now treated more than 25,000 patients concomitantly with WATCHMAN. As we look ahead, we continue to invest in our portfolio, clinical evidence, and driving efficiencies for physicians.

In the quarter, we announced a strategic partnership with Siemens Healthineers to develop and commercialize their next-generation 4D ICE catheter called AcuNav, intended to offer physicians an innovative imaging option for standalone WATCHMAN or FARAWATCH procedures. Last month, we completed enrollment in the SIMPLIFY clinical trial evaluating two single-drug regimens as post-procedural alternatives to dual antiplatelet therapy, with data expected in the second half of '26.

Importantly, our CHAMPION trial, a large randomized trial studying WATCHMAN FLX versus novel oral anticoagulation, was accepted and will be presented as a late-breaker at ACC on Saturday, March 28. If positive, this data would support WATCHMAN as a first-line therapy for stroke prevention as an alternative to NOAC, and would expand the number of indicated patients from approximately 5 million today to 20 million globally.

We're extremely proud of our global EP performance in the quarter, with organic growth of 35% in fourth quarter, resulting in 73% growth on a full-year basis. As we enter our third year in the US with our market-leading PFA technology, we believe that approximately 70% of the AF ablations in the US in '25 were done with PFA, with that number closer to 50% globally.

Within the quarter, global growth was driven by PFA catheter utilization, supported by OPAL placements and a scaled, high-performing commercial organization. We continue to invest in our ecosystem approach to innovation, and recently received approval and limited market release in both Europe and the US for our FARAPOINT PFA catheter, NAV-enabled, that can create focal lesions, initially indicated for atrial flutter.

We're also studying FARAPOINT in the REMATCH AF trial for use in redo procedures, with data expected in 2027. We're pleased to have initiated the OPTIMIZE trial studying the Cortex OptiMap mapping technology with the FARAPULSE PFA system, which is intended to address our unmet needs in identifying sources of AFib as an alternative to traditional anatomic approaches, a capability that may be particularly important in more complex patients.

As we look to 2026, we anticipate that the EP market will grow approximately 15%, and we expect to outpace that market growth, led by our differentiated PFA portfolio, ongoing expansion and utilization of mapping systems, and continued adoption of PFA across the globe. Importantly, Boston Scientific is uniquely positioned with its leading AF Solutions portfolio and commercial team, and the value to physicians and patients with our concomitant FARAWATCH procedure, supporting operational efficiency and capacity.

In closing, I'm extremely proud of our team and our performance in 2025. We believe that our '26 guidance, along with our '26 to '28 goals of sales growing 10% plus, adjusted operating margin expansion of 150 basis points, and leveraged double-digit EPS growth, continue to be highly differentiated.

We have an incredibly strong global team that's focused on advancing science for patients globally while delivering differentiated results today and setting us up for a strong 2026 and beyond. With that, I'll turn it over to John.

Thanks, Mike. Fourth-quarter consolidated revenue of $5,286,000,000 represents 15.9% reported growth versus fourth quarter 2024 and includes a 160 basis point tailwind from foreign exchange, which was in line with our expectations.

Excluding this $74 million foreign exchange tailwind, operational revenue growth was 14.3% in the quarter. Closed acquisitions contributed 160 basis points to sales, resulting in 12.7% organic revenue growth, at the high end of our fourth-quarter guidance range of 11% to 13%.

Q4 2025 adjusted earnings per share of 80 cents grew 15% versus 2024, exceeding the high end of our guidance range of 77 cents to 79 cents. Our performance was driven primarily by our favorable adjusted tax rate in the quarter.

Full-year 2025 consolidated revenue of $20,074,000,000 represents 19.9% reported growth versus full year 2024 and includes a 70 basis point tailwind from foreign exchange. Excluding this $114 million tailwind from foreign exchange, operational revenue growth for the year was 19.2%.

Closed acquisitions contributed 340 basis points to sales, resulting in 15.8% organic revenue growth, exceeding our full-year guidance of approximately 15.5%. Full-year 2025 adjusted earnings per share of $3.06 grew 22% versus 2024, exceeding the high end of our guidance range of $3.02 to $3.04, and marking our third consecutive year of 20% plus adjusted earnings per share growth.

Adjusted gross margin for the fourth quarter was 70.7%, resulting in full-year 2025 adjusted gross margin of 70.6%, representing a 30 basis point expansion versus full year 2024. In 2026, we anticipate full-year adjusted gross margin to be roughly in line with full year 2025, as we expect favorable product mix to be largely offset by investments in our global supply chain and the annualization of tariffs.

Fourth-quarter adjusted operating margin was 27.3%, resulting in a full-year 2025 adjusted operating margin of 28.0%, improving 100 basis points versus full year 2024. In 2026, we expect to expand adjusted operating margin by 50 to 75 basis points, progressing toward our goal of 150 basis points of operating margin expansion over our long-range plan.

On a GAAP basis, fourth-quarter operating margin was 15.6%, resulting in a full-year reported operating margin of 18.0%. These results include a $194 million litigation charge relating to the full resolution of a legacy IP-related matter.

Moving to below the line, fourth-quarter adjusted interest and other expenses totaled $99 million, resulting in full-year adjusted interest and other expenses of $430 million, slightly favorable to our expectations, primarily driven by higher interest income. On an adjusted basis, our tax rate for the fourth quarter was 10.7% and 11.7% for the full year, which was favorable to expectations and inclusive of favorable discrete tax items.

Our operational tax rate was 14.9% for the fourth quarter and 14.2% for the full year, in line with our expectations. Fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding ended at 1,496,000,000 shares in the fourth quarter and 1,494,000,000 shares for full year 2025.

Free cash flow for the fourth quarter was $1,013,000,000, with $1,364,000,000 from operating activities less $351 million in net capital expenditures. Full-year 2025 free cash flow of $3,659,000,000 exceeded our expectations, reflecting 38% growth versus 2024 and 80% free cash flow conversion.

For 2026, we expect full-year free cash flow to be approximately $4.2 billion, and we continue to target free cash flow conversion in the range of 70% to 80% over the long-range plan. As of December 31st, 2025, we had cash on hand of $1,965,000,000, and our gross debt leverage ratio was 1.9 times.

Following the announcement of our agreement to acquire Penumbra, all three major rating agencies affirmed our single A minus equivalent credit rating. Additionally, Fitch Ratings upgraded our outlook from stable to positive.

Our capital allocation priority remains strategic tuck-in M&A followed by share repurchases. In alignment with this strategy, we recently closed the acquisition of Nalu Medical, which is complementary to our Neuromodulation Pain franchise.

Additionally, we announced agreements to acquire Valencia Technologies and Penumbra, which upon close will enable Boston Scientific to enter strategic adjacencies within our Urology and Cardiovascular businesses, respectively. Our legal reserve was $242 million as of December 31st, with $46 million already funded through our qualified settlement funds.

I'll now walk through guidance for Q1 and full year 2026. We expect first-quarter 2026 reported revenue growth to be in a range of 10.5% to 12% versus first quarter 2025.

Excluding an approximate 200 basis point tailwind from foreign exchange based on current rates, we expect first-quarter 2026 operational and organic revenue growth to be in a range of 8.5% to 10%, which includes an approximate 150 basis point impact from the discontinuation of ACURATE and a transient impact associated with the product removal of certain sizes of our AXIOS device. We expect full-year 2026 reported revenue growth to be in a range of 10.5% to 11.5% versus 2025.

Excluding an approximate 50 basis point tailwind from foreign exchange based on current rates, we expect full-year 2026 operational and organic growth to be in a range of 10% to 11%. We expect full-year 2026 adjusted below-the-line expense to be approximately $440 million.

Under current legislation, including enacted laws and issued guidance, we forecast a full-year 2026 adjusted tax rate of approximately 12.5%. In Q1, we anticipate our adjusted tax rate will be approximately 12%.

We expect full-year 2026 adjusted earnings per share to be in a range of $3.43 to $3.49, representing growth of 12% to 14% versus 2025, including an approximate 3-cent headwind from foreign exchange. We expect first-quarter adjusted earnings per share to be in a range of 78 cents to 80 cents.

In closing, I'm pleased with the strong financial performance our global team delivered in 2025, and we look forward to executing on our full-year 2026 guidance of 10% to 11% organic revenue growth, 50 to 75 basis points of adjusted operating margin expansion, and 12% to 14% adjusted earnings per share growth. For more information, please check our Investor Relations website for fourth-quarter 2025 financial and operational highlights, which outlines more details on fourth-quarter results and our 2026 guidance.

With that, Lauren, I'll turn it back to you to moderate the Q&A.

Thanks, John. Drew, let's open it up for questions for the next 35 minutes or so.

In order for us to take as many questions as possible, please limit yourself to one question. Drew, please go ahead.

Great. Thanks for taking the questions.

I'll ask the question that's on everybody's mind today. Mike, there were fears that US EP and US WATCHMAN could come in soft, and US EP was flat with third quarter, US WATCHMAN missed by a hair.

What exactly happened in the quarter versus your expectations versus the market? The reason people are concerned is these are two of the key growth drivers.

You talked about confidence in above 15% EP growth next year of the market. The street sitting at around 25%.

It feels like that needs to come down. Hopefully, you could help us level-set expectations for those two key products, what happened in the quarter, and how to think about them in '26.

Thanks.

Thank you. Thank you, Robbie.

I'll touch on your question. Overall, we're super pleased with the quarter and the full year, growing 16%, EPS growing 22% for the full year, and six of our eight business units growing faster than the market, growing faster than the WAMGR, and setting us up for strong guide and investments for the overall company.

The two businesses that you called out, I think you nailed it. If you look at EP, we're quite pleased.

Actually, our results in Q4 exceeded our internal target. WATCHMAN grew 29%, pretty much similar to third quarter as we elapsed the anniversary of the concomitant reimbursement a year ago.

Specific to EP, really pleased with the results of 35%. Two of our larger competitors had results of 6.5% growth, the market leader; third-place player, 12.5%.

We grew 35. We continued to gain share overall.

To your point, we think the market in Q4 was closer to 18% to 20% growth rather than what some other companies have claimed at 25%. We think the market was kind of in the 18% to 20% range, similar to what we developed internally in our plan, and we've called the market for 2026 about 15% growth.

We think it's an excellent market. We don't think it grew 25% in fourth quarter.

We grew faster than our peer group based on those percentages that we laid out. We actually grew even faster outside the US than the US.

The US is more highly penetrated with PFA. There's actually more competitors present outside the US, and we've accelerated growth outside the US.

Our PFA performance is quite strong. The market's still healthy.

We think it's 18% to 20% in fourth quarter. We exceeded our internal plan, we got new products approved, our mapping footprint continues to grow, and we have a lot of various clinical studies that are in flight.

We're very confident with our PFA business and our performance. With WATCHMAN, we grew 29%.

Excellent job. We pretty much are the market with WATCHMAN.

Concomitant continues to grow, and we did annualize the concomitant reimbursement, which happened fourth quarter last year. We're quite proud of the 29%.

When you come to these consensus numbers, we exceeded our guidance, we actually exceeded analyst consensus. The mix of that is slightly different, but it shows the power of all of Boston Scientific, being able to beat our guidance, to beat consensus in the quarter and the full year, and we're quite proud of the EP performance based on the commentary I just provided.

Good morning. Thanks for taking the question.

Look, I'm sure there'll be a lot of questions on the US EP business, but I wanted to ask about WATCHMAN. Basically, my question is, can you confirm you're not seeing an impact from the three recent trials we saw in 2025?

I want to ask about CHAMPION. It's such an important trial.

Maybe for Dr. Stein, what endpoints do you think physicians will be most focused on, and how important do you think it is to physicians to see similar rates of both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, like we did in OPTION?

I'll leave it at that. Thank you.

Larry. Again, look forward to presenting the results of CHAMPION at ACC.

We will be hosting an event for investors on that Saturday night at 5:30 p.m. Central Time, and we can get deep into the data at that point.

Again, I think there are two co-primary endpoints. One, non-inferiority for a combined endpoint, stroke, systemic embolism, and death; one for bleeding.

Just as we saw with OPTION, I think both of those are going to be important for the field. In terms of the first half of your question, again, you just saw the numbers we reported out.

It can very, without any equivocation, say that we have not seen any impact from those trials: CLOSURE, ALONE-AF, and OCEAN. Again, we continue to see very robust uptake of WATCHMAN in general, and of concomitant procedures specifically.

Hey, thanks for taking the question. I guess I want to push a little more on US EP, just because it was flat sequentially and your RF competitors grew $18 million and $26 million sequentially in the US, it doesn't look like share change versus last quarter, at least on a sequential basis.

I don't know if there was something that changed late in the quarter, because you were pretty bullish at some December meetings with investors. I don't know if anything kind of changed at the end of the quarter, and especially considering the Q1 guide of 8.5% to 10%, and kind of what that means for EP in the early part of '26.

I think we've been pretty consistent with our messaging on EP. We do think the market's 18% to 20%, like we said.

I think some maybe have overshot the market growth in Q4. When you're the highest market share leader in PFA and competitors are coming out, we planned and we did expect to lose some share given their competitive launches that are coming out and given our really dominant market share position going into 2025.

We did anticipate that, and we're also very comfortable to say that as we look at the end of '26 that we'll be the clear PFA market leader, and we also think our EP business will grow faster than 15%. With new entrants coming, it's not surprising that we lost some share.

The overall EP growth of 35%, I think is quite impressive given the size of that business now, and grew faster overall than our competitors. On the first-quarter guide, we guided full year to 10% to 11%, which we think is strong guidance given where we are early in the year here, and 8.5% to 10% it's simply two factors really: one is our toughest comp of the year, and secondly, we do have about 150 bps of impact from the ACURATE discontinuation along with the AXIOS partial matrix withdrawal, which will impact the first half of the year.

We see both those issues will be addressed as you get into, call it, June for the second half of the year, with the impact of ACURATE being gone, AXIOS being gone, our product launches, and slightly easier comps, although it's still tough, but slightly easier than the first quarter.

Good morning, Mike. Hate to stick with EP, but looking at the EP discussion from another angle, maybe talk us through your expectations for how the '25 year is going to unfold.

Maybe the cadence of the year, specifically relating to better understanding the growth acceleration that seems likely to occur as the quarters progress, helped by your innovation pipeline. Maybe you can drill down further into what are the implications of FARAPOINT and talk to us again about the ancillary products like ICE catheter, etc., and maybe any updates on the FARAFLEX timing, we better understand how, again, the cadence of '25 and the setup as we head for '26, and then the setup for '27.

Thank you.

Sure. I guess as we exit '25, we're kind of in a whatever, 65-ish percent PFA market share position.

We have a market that we think is going to grow 15%. We have high utilization in the US, call it 80%—70%, 80%—and outside the US quite a bit lower.

With a healthy market, we expect to continue to grow above market. Our PFA share will reduce somewhat, but we're very confident by year-end, likely if you add all the other competitors together, our share will be equal to them, or in that area.

We're not going to break out share by quarter, but we're very confident that we'll maintain clear market leadership in PFA over the course of 2026 and beyond. I think if you look at the drivers that continue the strong pace of growth overall: one, it's geographic scope.

We continue to gain share in Japan. We just got a persistent indication.

We continue to drive more account openings, utilization in Japan. China is a very, very big market, a small part of our number.

We made significant investments the past 18 months in China, and you'll see China having a more significant impact on our overall global growth. Europe's the most competitive market, but our growth rates quite impressive there, and we just got approval for the FARAPOINT catheter.

In the US, same thing, our now more significant scaled mapping commercial team continues to gain experience, continues to add more mappers, more OPAL systems. The FARAPOINT product will allow us more time in the lab to expand our reach in different clinical indications.

We have a host of products in the pipeline. You mentioned a few of them.

They won't impact 2026 in a meaningful way, but we continue to widen out the portfolio with our Cortex clinical trial work being done, the recent FARAPOINT approval, and then we have a whole cadence of new catheters coming over the coming 1 to 3 years. We have significant investments in the portfolio, and we continue to expect to be the clear market leader and have a very strong '26, growing faster than the market.

Good morning, and thank you for taking the questions. I suspect many of us will be picking through WATCHMAN and FARAPULSE or EP for quite some time.

To dry the back half of the year, I suspect other products are accelerating, and it's not just easing comps from AXIOS and ACURATE. What would you like to highlight to us that you see for a second-half accelerant and then into 2027 so maybe we can expand our focus just a little bit?

Thanks.

Great. I think again, we expect to have a great year in EP and WATCHMAN.

We've got CHAMPION trial results coming through. Concomitant is doing terrific.

We're training more EP docs on concomitant every day. As you said, broadly the comps do get a little bit easier.

We expect to have stronger performance in a number of our business units in '26 versus what we had in '25. We do expect our PI business, our Euro business, our Neuromod business, and our CRM businesses to have stronger years in '26 than they did in '25.

Not many questions on Neuromod, but that business we expect to be a high performer in '26, along with improvement in PI, Euro, and CRM. Then you have our other businesses, which are performing quite well.

As we get through this AXIOS issue, our Endo business is strong, our IO business is now scaled to over $1 billion, growing nicely in the double digits. Our Coronary business grew 20% in the quarter, and now we're launching our Seismic IVL in PI, and we just finished enrollment in our IVL platform for Coronary.

Importantly, we've also initiated our first clinical work with VITALIST and hypertension. We have a number of investments that we're making for the long term.

It's really the whole of Boston Scientific, and of our eight divisions, six of them grew faster than the market, which is pretty consistent. We grow faster than WAMGR.

We love our EP business, we love our WATCHMAN business, but it's the entire company that gives us confidence in the 10% to 11% guide for the full year.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone.

I wanted to ask, Mike, if you could just expand a little bit more as you think about the diversification of growth drivers here on a go-forward basis, as you kind of reflect on 2025. You had some challenges in Urology, you're raising some challenges here in Endoscopy in the first half of the year.

What investments and processes are you putting in place to make sure that you're seeing consistency and performance in the non-EP and WATCHMAN businesses, given those will represent a much more significant percentage of growth here on a go-forward basis?

We do we do that every day at the company. I highlighted on Neuromod, a smaller business, but I think you'll see strong performance in 2026.

We just added additional product in that category via acquisition. Urology was a tougher year this year.

We had some supply chain issues, Axonics integration didn't go as well as we wanted to initially with commercial disruption, but we feel comfortable with that. Also with new product launches coming in Urology, we expect Urology to be at minimum back-to-market growth, with our Euro business, Neuromod quite a bit above growth.

Endo is really a solid, high-performing company with second-half launches that'll be important for us once we get through that AXIOS issue. A lot of confidence that MedSurg in general should have ideally we plan on a better year than '26 in '26 versus '25.

Other businesses, ICTx is a very large business with us now. Our complex coronary business grew 23% I'm sorry, is it complex coronary grew 31% in the quarter, 23% for the year.

Our ICTx business, despite the discontinuation of ACURATE, grew 10% in the quarter. That business is doing extremely well with AGENT, with our with our imaging portfolio, and we have the most product launches and biggest clinical studies in that business.

We continue to diversify and strengthen that ICTx business that's doing quite well. Our Interventional Oncology business, we have new product launches there, we've done a tuck-in M&A.

We continue to fuel all of our businesses. We don't invest at the same rate for all of them, given the WATCHMAN and EP growth profile, but we it's classic Boston Scientific, doing organic R&D, tuck-in M&A to continue to to continue to grow above our weighted average market growth rate.

Beautiful. Thank you for taking the question.

I'd love to hop off essentially from that topic. If I zoom out, there's been a ton of money spent building out people's vascular sales forces, obviously the proposed transaction on your side, but some of your peers too in the last kind of 18 months.

I guess as I was reflecting on that, I was like, how much is that going to help things like Seismic and the IVL side and TCAR building out that force in a larger way? Then equally, are there things coming down the pipe, over and above AGENT, that we can't see on the vascular side that's causing a lot of money to be deployed in acquiring and building out sales forces there?

Thanks.

I'm not sure I quite get the question. I would say on the commercial side, we have tremendous scale in our PI business commercially and within our Interventional Cardiology business.

We're combining the reporting structure of those business units together. We're very much market leaders in that area.

The announcement of Penumbra, as we talked about, is really exciting for us. It gets us into new high-growth markets in PE and neurovascular, just to name a few, with a highly scaled sales force.

In terms of commercial clinical capability, I think we're pretty unmatched in that area. Traditionally with the company, you've seen a lot of organic R&D, like AGENT was, and a lot of clinical work with new products being introduced starting with IVL this year, and we'll continue to look at more tuck-in M&A there.

I think that whole what we call that ICVT area now, we're very bullish on, and some of the biggest investments in the company are in that area.

Good morning, guys. Thanks so much for taking the question.

Mike, sorry, this is another EP/WATCHMAN question, and maybe it's actually for Dr. Stein, though.

I guess I'm curious, as you see competitors launch, I know you guys talked about pretty significant efficiency gains with FARAPULSE and PFA devices overall, those are probably slowing. We have WATCHMAN coming.

I asked this at the Analyst Day, but I'm just curious what's playing out in the real world as far as capacity at the EP lab, because a lot of the docs we talk to sound like they have growing wait lists for their EP procedures, and this could only just get exacerbated once CHAMPION comes, assuming CHAMPION's positive. I'm just curious what you could say to that and how much that is currently impacting overall market growth.

Thanks so much.

Danielle, I think you nailed it, right? We're 3 years into the launch of FARAPULSE in the US.

I think the efficiency gains that people saw are largely now built into the system. I think, as Mike has said, that's why what we're looking for, again, is 15% growth in the EP market next year.

Again, we are growing and believe we will continue to grow faster than that market. Feel a little sort of almost silly that I'm apologizing for 15% growth in what's one of the largest markets in MedTech.

The keys to driving that forward will be, a, starting the build-out of ASCs in the United States to unlock some more capacity and reduce those waiting lists; continued just development and repurposing cath labs for the use for EP procedures in the hospital; continuing what we can do as a company to help further drive greater efficiency in procedures. Things that we can do with concomitant procedures, just growth of concomitant overall helps with that efficiency.

We've talked about some of the other investments that we've made, the partnership with Siemens on 4D ICE. Really, until all of those things play out, that's why we really don't see growth exceeding 20% in the market and why that 15% seems to us to be a much more realistic way to view it.

Again, to close, it is our intent to continue to grow faster than that market.

Hey, good morning. I have a question on ICE.

The partnership with Siemens Healthineers for the 4D catheter versus your plans to launch a 2D product, can you just help us understand, do these things work together? Does the partnership with Siemens, is that a reflection of a fresh view on how do you plan to go to market with the 2D product?

Help us understand how these are catalysts, how they coexist. I would appreciate any color.

Thank you.

We'll give just a little bit. It's a bit too early for that.

We're excited about the Siemens collaboration. That's a product that's in development, it's not commercially available yet.

In partnership with them, it's really going to be different segments. That'll be very much a premium product, and markets that can pay for a premium product, and we think it'll be differentiated and further differentiate our WATCHMAN and FARAFLEX capability.

2D ICE would be a different price point. It's been an established market for a while.

Our 2D ICE programs will really be just a nice portfolio addition to our overall portfolio within our EP portfolio bag.

Hi, thanks for taking the question. I wanted to follow up on CHAMPION.

You sound excited about that, and should be, it's a big study. I was wondering if you could comment on the range of outcomes for that, obviously non-inferiority trial.

Do you think there's any chance of showing superiority on any of the endpoints or the secondary endpoints? I also wanted to ask if you think a positive CHAMPION result could boost concomitant in the OPTION indication.

Matt. I think first off, just to clarify, the bleeding endpoint is powered as a superiority endpoint.

We'll see what it shows when we report it out, but the goal there would be to show superiority on bleeding complications. To power for superiority on stroke would have needed a trial that would probably have been an order of magnitude larger.

I don't think we need to show superiority on stroke. Again, the goal here would be to show that WATCHMAN would be not inferior, so as effective as the drugs, but to be able to show superiority in bleeding.

Again, that was what we demonstrated with OPTION. I think everyone's seen the impact that that's had for the OPTION population.

In terms of the second part of the question, I think it's perceptive question, because there are a couple of things that would happen if CHAMPION does turn out to be positive, all right? One is developing the new indication, but the other is strengthening the current indication.

I do believe that a positive CHAMPION would give increased impetus for referrers to refer in for the current indication, which includes the OPTION indication. It will take time to build out the new indication, get better representation and guidelines, and get a revision of the CMS National Coverage Determination.

Again, that's part of when we look at the CHAMPION story, right, if it's positive, it's not just a step change in growth in WATCHMAN, but it's something that sustains the growth in WATCHMAN over our long-range plan.

Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking the question.

Mike, it's only been a couple months since the Investor Day, and I think just wanted to hear about your confidence level in hitting your LRP targets through '28, specifically the 10% plus organic revenue growth goal. Throughout this call, I think your confidence level is clear that the 2026 10 the guidance is achievable, but any updates just on your confidence level through the LRP and the double-digit organic revenue growth target?

Thanks for taking the question.

That hasn't changed. If we're doing Investor Day today, you'd get the same numbers.

10% plus, '26 to '28, 150 bps of margin improvement, strong double-digit EPS growth, even within that. Then we think Penumbra further enhances our WAMGR and further strengthens the company beyond that.

Really no change of position here. Our whole key to our business is being in fast-growth markets, which we've demonstrated.

We anticipate in that time horizon the WAMGR gets closer to 9%. Penumbra actually could slightly even improve that once that closes by a small margin, but slightly improve it.

Excluding Penumbra, we're very comfortable with those LRP goals, as we've stated.

Great. Thanks for fitting me in.

I think I heard you say that you think US PFA penetration is already at 70% for AF cases, which is a little higher than we're thinking and suggests that we're already in the latter innings of that mix shift. I'd love to hear your thoughts on what's left to penetrate with PFA, particularly as we think about other procedure categories like SVT or VT, and what's going to be necessary from either a product or a data perspective in order to really move into those segments.

Thanks, Chris. Again, I think first of all, right, if 70% penetrated in AFib, there's still 30% left to penetrate.

There's always just that tailwind of adoption of new technologies. I think as you look at arrhythmias other than atrial fibrillation, there are probably the two prime use cases where we would see a real advantage to moving to PFA would be for atrial tachycardias, the atypical atrial flutter type thing.

Although, frankly, we think that's going to be a diminishing part of the market going forward, because usually where that's seen, that's a redo AF ablation, and we just see redo numbers shrinking with the efficacy of FARAPULSE for de novo ablation. I think the other thing you hit on is ventricular tachycardia.

We're already engaged in a couple of studies of using FARAPULSE technology for ablation in the ventricles, and it's one of the areas where both FARAPOINT catheter and FARAFLEX catheter, which is in development now and very pleased with the progress of that in its first human use studies, but that is one of the areas where, again, I think those catheters and those form factors are going to shine.

Thank you for joining us today. We appreciate your interest in Boston Scientific.

If we were unable to get to your question or if you have any follow-ups, please don't hesitate to reach out to the Investor Relations team. Before you disconnect, Drew will give you all of the pertinent details for the replay.

Thank you, everyone.