Thank you, Carmen. Hello there.

I'm Michael Sheetz and welcome to Firefly's second quarter financial results call. I'm pleased to be joined on the call by CEO Jason Kim and CFO Darren Ma as we report for the period ending June 30, 2026.

Today's call will include forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, statements the company will make about its future financial and operating performance, growth strategy, and market outlook. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by these forward-looking statements.

Factors that could cause the actual results and trends to differ materially are set forth in our annual and quarterly reports filed with the SEC. Firefly assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their respective dates.

Also in this call, we will discuss both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures is included in the second quarter 2026 earnings release.

Unless otherwise stated, financial information referenced in this call will be non-GAAP. Our earnings press release, SEC filings, and a replay of today's call can be found on our Investor Relations website at investors.fireflyspace.com.

Now, I'll turn the call over to Jason.

Thank you, Michael, and welcome to our second quarter 2026 earnings call. Firefly's first quarter surpassing $100 million comes in just our ninth year as a business, pairing record-breaking revenue with our history-making programs.

Halfway through the year, the momentum we started with is building across our entire company, bolstered by multiple flagship contract wins and operational milestones achieved on our revenue-generating Blue Ghost, Elytra, Alpha, Eclipse, FORGE, and Golden Dome programs, as well as the recent acquisition of SpaceNG. Our second quarter contract wins drove our backlog to a record total of $1.5 billion, further supporting our long-term growth trajectory.

Our strategic investments to increase spacecraft production capacity are timely, given the latest round of NASA Moonbase contract awards for both Blue Ghost and Elytra. To showcase our expanded 144,000-square-foot spacecraft campus, my team and I hosted NASA's Moonbase Lead Carlos Garcia-Galan for a tour of landers, transfer vehicles, vertically integrated manufacturing, and our mission operations center.

After seeing our end-to-end capabilities, Carlos shared that our recent Moonfall program award is not only important for space exploration, it is also important for national security as future missions can collaborate with the Space Force. Our capabilities are inherently dual-use, such as our Ocula imaging and mapping service, we embrace this call to action.

We will continue to find ways to synergize between NASA and the Space Force to force-multiply their investments toward a common strategic goal of securing the ultimate high ground. As demonstrated by our recent track record of landing and surface operations, as well as contract awards, the spacecraft we're building will deliver and support many of the capabilities needed to enable a permanent presence on the moon.

Our lunar contracts constitute a revenue-generating flywheel, with NASA as the base customer and additional bolt-on contracts from a diverse set of commercial and international customers. Additionally, space is a national security priority as shown by significant year-over-year increases in the US Space Force budget, major conflicts around the world, and evolving missile threats.

Market signals from customers point to orbital launch only getting more supply-constrained. Demand for government and commercial constellations and missions outstrips the rocket capacity available both in the US and globally.

Moonbase, national security, Golden Dome, and assured access to launch are driving significant industry tailwinds for space. Firefly is addressing those pressing needs with the advancement of our technologies, scaling of our product lines, and development and training of our workforce.

Space is accelerating, and Firefly is accelerating with it. For those new to Firefly, and as a reminder for others, we are a space and defense company delivering innovative hardware and software to perform the hardest missions in space for national security, exploration, and commercial technology.

Our hardware is represented by our spacecraft—the Blue Ghost lunar landers and Elytra satellite orbiters—and our launch vehicles, the small-lift Alpha and medium-lift Eclipse. Our spacecraft solutions platform also includes our software portfolio of AI-enabled offerings, which are proven in national security operations as well as autonomous guidance and navigation systems.

The industry tailwinds behind artificial intelligence, data centers, and autonomy are fueling operational realities for our company as we deliver crucial, no-fail systems in support of the US and our allies. We have co-located, vertically integrated infrastructure within a 25-mile radius near Austin, Texas.

This is where we develop and build our own carbon composite structures, in-house patented engine technology, and software autonomy for all of our products. We are obsessively focused on prioritizing safety, quality, and reliability as we scale up our hardware and software product deliveries for our national security, space exploration, and commercial customers.

Now turning to our business updates, in the second quarter, we completed new milestones across each of our product lines and services while also engaging with our top customers. As the leading lunar company, we're proud to have won our fifth and sixth moon mission contracts during the second quarter, adding two more missions for delivery in 2028.

During the second quarter, NASA awarded us with another Commercial Lunar Payload Services contract for an accelerated Blue Ghost lander mission to the moon. The primary goal of this mission is to demonstrate repeatable access to the lunar surface on an accelerated timeline, executing the mission in half the time of our first landing.

This increases our target from one annual lunar landing to multiple per year. NASA's contract represents a near build-to-print lander design to enable faster production cycles and template our successful Blue Ghost into a production-line vehicle.

For our next lunar mission that is landing on the far side of the moon, we completed assembly of the Blue Ghost lander's main structural and fluid components. We're now integrating the avionics and payloads as we prepare to stack the lander on top of our Elytra spacecraft.

All of our primary structures have passed acceptance testing for our far-side mission, while our flight-proven Spectre engines are undergoing acceptance testing in preparation for integration. All the mission payloads have been delivered as well.

We are currently anticipating Riders to the Dark will launch early next year, pending delivery of our spacecraft to Florida and confirmation of the launch window. Similar to our first mission, we'll have one-week windows each month to ensure we arrive at the surface for the beginning of lunar day.

Riders to the Dark will showcase one of the most complex multistage missions to the moon to date. The full spacecraft stack is 22 feet tall, consisting of our lander on top, the European Space Agency Lunar Pathfinder satellite in the middle, and our Elytra spacecraft at the bottom.

Elytra will serve as a long-haul communications relay orbiter and host our commercial Ocula imaging and mapping service. We are proud to support both commercial and international payloads.

Our far-side mission carries payloads representing the US, Australia, Canada, the United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom. Additionally, we acquired SpaceNG, a leader in AI-powered vision navigation and autonomous guidance systems, further adding to Firefly's vertical integration.

They bring proven spacecraft software and camera hardware for Blue Ghost and Elytra, bolstering our capabilities to advance the future of autonomous space operations. Firefly is partnering with Benchmark Space Systems on their recent selection for the DARPA LASSO program.

We will help the mission operate safely and persistently in very low lunar orbit, utilizing our newly acquired SpaceNG team and their vision navigation hardware and software. The software from our new acquisition was proven on Blue Ghost Mission 1 when it performed autonomous hazard avoidance and navigation in the last hour to ensure we safely and softly landed on the moon's surface.

Work on Blue Ghost mission to the Gruithuisen Domes is well underway as the team completed the critical design review with our customer during the second quarter. This milestone progressed development of the spacecraft as we march towards this historic mission to the silica-rich volcanic features of the moon where humanity has never explored.

Our rover subcontractor Blue Origin recently passed its critical design review, unlocking the flight build toward delivery to Firefly. Likewise, on Blue Ghost South Pole mission, we completed the preliminary design review to verify the vehicle's design before production begins.

We continue to expand our spacecraft capabilities both in infrastructure and technologies. During the second quarter, we expanded our Cedar Park campus, adding a new headquarters that is closer to our spacecraft facilities.

We are more than quadrupling our spacecraft clean room space thanks to our grant from the Texas Space Commission. We added our GlowWorks innovation lab to support accelerated research and development without any disruption to our mature production lines.

We're also looking ahead toward larger lander designs which are maturing. We've submitted our proposal for the $6 billion CLPS 2.0 program and look forward to competing for opportunities to support the increased payload mass and volume needed to build Moonbase infrastructure.

Moving to Elytra, in the second quarter, Firefly won a new flagship role: Moonfall. We're proud to support this high-priority mission for NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory under a $75 million subcontract for Elytra to deliver flying JPL drones to the moon's South Pole in 2028.

We have a robust working relationship with JPL from our Blue Ghost missions, and are eager to collaborate further as we dare mighty things together. There's keen national security interest in Elytra as well.

Building upon the way we are using Elytra to carry our landers in support of Moonfall, the Space Force has come out with a pressing request for information about fast transfer vehicles. These spacecraft could take critical national security small satellite payloads from GTO to GEO on diverse launch vehicles on a recurring basis.

Elytra is uniquely suited to service this type of upside opportunity. In today's launch-constrained reality, transfer vehicles become a relief valve for critical customers who are more schedule-sensitive and just need a way to get to their mission-unique destination from any available medium- to heavy-launch vehicle.

The Elytra we are building for the Defense Innovation Unit's Project Sinequanone is making progress toward launching next year. During the second quarter, we completed the integrated readiness review, which ensures that the spacecraft segment, components, and subsystems are available and ready to be integrated into the system.

Since the end of the quarter, we also won a new spacecraft subcontract to support NASA's Skyfall mission to Mars. Through JPL, this $13 million award will see us manufacture, test, and deliver the mission's aeroshell for launch in late 2028.

This is a strategic win for Firefly as it is the first time our core capabilities for the moon will extend to Mars. This is another statement mission for JPL, as Skyfall is a high-visibility program that will deploy a cluster of helicopter drones to the Mars surface.

We have many upcoming shots on goal to support consequential Moonbase, national security, and space exploration missions with our landers and orbiters. Our SciTec national security AI team added multiple wins as well.

In the second quarter, we were awarded a US Air Force contract option to deliver the operational data fusion system for the Cloud-Based Command and Control program. This came after a multi-year competition wherein our data fusion system was evaluated and selected from among high-profile industry and government-owned alternatives.

This program is the centerpiece to the Department of Air Force's Air Battle Management System. Also in the second quarter, the Air Force Research Laboratory awarded us a contract to support development of the Advanced Algorithm R&D and Verification Architecture.

We'll be supporting AFRL by implementing deep learning and advanced AI algorithms on small size, weight, and power processors. This capability supports enhanced target detection, tracking, and custody, and is conducive to future on-orbit processing missions across multiple domains.

It's also worth emphasizing again that Firefly was announced as a prime contractor for the Golden Dome program early in the second quarter. As a prime contractor on Golden Dome, we have a decisive seat at the table with the customer to listen to their needs and drive rapid solutions.

It is no surprise to us that our AI capabilities are well-positioned due to our battle-tested operational FORGE program. We are processing high volumes of missile warning and tracking satellite data at rapid data rates to help inform our Guardians of threats simultaneously to keep our nation and allies safe.

In the first half of the year, I spoke to senior Pentagon generals and congressional leaders. There is unanimous support and advocacy for how critical FORGE is to the nation to keep ahead of advanced missile threats.

FORGE recently achieved another operational milestone by integrating the GEO Wide Field of View spacecraft into the platform. FORGE continues to support conflicts around the world and recently received a superior performance rating from the Department of War for supporting operations in the Iran conflict.

A few weeks ago, Firefly's SciTec won a $94 million Space Force contract under the Ground-Based Radar Digitization effort. The G-BARD program of record is a critical overhaul of legacy missile defense systems.

We took the FORGE playbook in missile warning and tracking and applied it to the G-BARD competition to secure this strategic win, and now we are in execution. Nearly a year since our acquisition, this win represents the synergy of Firefly and SciTec in a 1 + 1 = 4 moment as our combined platform helps unlock capability.

Shifting to launch, we are driving forward to launch our first Block 2 Alpha, with Flight 8 now targeting the fourth quarter of the year. We are preparing for acceptance testing of Alpha in the next few weeks, followed by delivery to Vandenberg, static fire, payload integration, and then launch.

As with any flight, we'll disclose more specific timing as we get closer to launch. Launch timing is always dependent on variable factors such as customer readiness, regulatory approval, range availability, weather conditions, and other factors that are not with our control.

We also will conduct a thorough review of our post-Flight 8 data to ensure any lessons learned flow into subsequent launches. We are targeting to launch Alpha two additional times this year, Flight 8 and 9, for a total of three launches in 2026.

Flights 10 and 11 are already flowing through our production line as we build ahead for next year. Our demand remains strong, having sold the majority of Alpha's manifest through 2027.

We have visibility into out-years as well, in part thanks to the extension of our Lockheed Martin multi-launch agreement. Additionally, we added a second hypersonic task order for Alpha from a confidential customer.

During the second quarter, I visited Sweden's Esrange Space Center and met with our partner SSC Space. With our support, they have completed critical milestones to get the pad ready, including the payload processing facility, horizontal integration building, ground support equipment buildings, and a launch control center.

Final construction of Launch Complex 3C is underway, and our first launch from Sweden is targeted for no earlier than 2028. We also recently hosted Space BD, our partners from Japan, who are eager to replicate Sweden's blueprint on their side of the Pacific.

At the Farnborough Airshow in the UK, we met with new and existing customers who are keen to fly on Alpha from our current and future launch sites. These launch site expansions increase our cadence capacity beyond our operational Vandenberg Space Force Base launch pad.

As we go global, our increased production rate supports Alpha's underlying growth strategy. We are making progress on rating up Alpha production while keeping safety, quality, and reliability top of mind.

We have taken new steps to increase Alpha production, and between May and August, we significantly increased overall production throughput. For a few examples, our new Alpha mandrel tooling drove improvements in structure production time, allowing our automated fiber placement machine to decrease runtime and enhance quality while manufacturing multiple vehicle structures simultaneously.

We are increasing Reaver chamber throughput via more efficient machine labor and equipment utilization, leading to Reaver engine integration at higher rates. Our CoreTex engineering facility, which opened in spring, added 55,000 square feet for subsystems production.

This has already driven improvements in the pace of making harnessing, batteries, and avionics that are used across our vehicles. Moving to Eclipse, we are focused on delivering the vehicle's first stage to our co-developer Northrop Grumman, progressing through milestones for building and testing Eclipse.

We are maturing Eclipse toward first flight. Our thunderous Miranda engine, designed for reusability, crossed 150 hot fire tests to date as the campaign crosses key milestones at pace.

A big recent unlock was the flight-like mission duty cycle test that the team completed, with the engine firing for 226 seconds, all while completing both power ratio and mixture ratio sweeps. Our Miranda engine qualification test campaign is imminent, as our recent tests demonstrated the performance needed to meet the range of stress requirements during a launch.

We're building ahead with flight Miranda engine chambers in production. The team also completed a burst press qualification campaign of first-stage COPVs, and the first flight's forward bay is built and completed testing, with our first-stage tank test campaign now underway.

The engine bay structure, which mounts the seven Miranda engines for each Eclipse first stage, is in assembly and bonding as we prepare for integration. Finally, the metal hold-down release adapter is in build, which is a key piece of ground infrastructure that we are preparing for proof testing.

We invested in a new on-site mezzanine at our Rocket Ranch with workstations that bring engineering and manufacturing teams to the factory floor, which you can see here is co-located with our production line. Firefly is addressing the most pressing demands from our diverse, blue-chip customer base.

Our team is focused on executing, improving our technologies, scaling our capacity to deliver our products, and strengthening our bold and passionate workforce. With that business summary, I'll turn it over to Darren for a review of the second quarter financials.

Thank you, Jason, and good afternoon, everyone. Today marks a defining moment for Firefly.

We delivered record revenue, crossing the $100 million threshold for the first time, while simultaneously achieving the highest backlog in the company's history at $1.5 billion. These milestone results demonstrate the accelerating demand for end-to-end space and defense solutions and are a direct reflection of our team's execution.

Second quarter revenue of $117.7 million represents 46% sequential growth and an impressive 659% increase year-over-year. This acceleration was driven by exceptional performance in our spacecraft solutions business, where for the first time in company history, our team is executing on five lunar missions in parallel.

We are also experiencing similar momentum in our AI software solutions, with the national security customer requesting acceleration of their hardware order by one quarter. Within total revenue, spacecraft accounted for $108.3 million and launch was $9.4 million.

For those new to Firefly, let me briefly explain our revenue recognition model as it's critical to understanding our financial trajectory. The spacecraft solutions business generally recognizes revenue over time under each contract as we complete contract milestones.

This provides a more predictable, recurring revenue component alongside the more event-driven launch business. For the launch business, we focus on the number of launches.

For example, revenue for Alpha is recognized at a point in time when the launch occurs. For Eclipse, we currently recognize revenue as a percentage of completion based on program milestones as part of the Northrop Grumman partnership.

Once the Eclipse vehicle is operational, we will recognize revenue when launches occur in the same manner as Alpha. We closed the second quarter with a total backlog of approximately $1.5 billion, up from $1.3 billion last quarter.

This represents significant growth when you consider that we converted existing backlog into $117.7 million in quarterly revenue. The contract awards this quarter were headlined by two additional NASA lunar missions and the Alpha multi-launch agreement extension from Lockheed Martin.

Subsequently after Q2, we closed an additional hypersonic task order, won a NASA JPL mission to Mars, and onboarded to the Space Force's G-BARD and Lightstar programs. Second quarter GAAP gross margin was 20.3% compared with 21.6% in the prior quarter.

The modest decline was driven primarily by FORGE hardware purchases to support a US government program during heightened geopolitical conflicts, as mentioned previously in the revenue section. GAAP operating expenses for the second quarter were $119.1 million compared with $113.1 million in the first quarter.

Non-GAAP operating expenses for the second quarter were $94.3 million compared with $93.7 million in the first quarter. The slight increase represents our continued R&D investments to support Alpha Block 2 production ramp and Eclipse development.

As a reminder, the primary differences between the GAAP and non-GAAP figures are stock-based compensation expense, one-time transaction-related expenses, and the amortization of intangibles. GAAP operating loss was $95.2 million compared with a loss of $95.7 million in last quarter.

Non-GAAP operating loss was $70.4 million compared with a loss of $76.2 million in the first quarter. GAAP net loss in the second quarter was $92.3 million compared with a GAAP net loss of $96.7 million in the first quarter.

Our non-GAAP net loss in the second quarter was $67.7 million. This compares with a non-GAAP net loss of $74 million in the prior quarter.

GAAP basic and diluted net loss per share was 57 cents compared with a GAAP net loss of 61 cents last quarter. Non-GAAP basic and diluted net loss per share for the second quarter was 42 cents compared with a loss of 46 cents last quarter.

The net loss per share figures were calculated using a weighted average share count of 161.8 million. We exited the second quarter with a share count of 166.2 million shares, which includes shares from our common stock offering completed in June.

For purposes of calculating net loss per share in the third quarter, we expect weighted average share count to be approximately 167.2 million. This number will increase by about 1 million shares per quarter.

Stock-based compensation expense was $17 million in the second quarter compared with $12.5 million in the prior quarter. The increase was related to new stock-based awards that were granted during the period.

Adjusted EBITDA in the second quarter was a loss of $61.2 million compared with a loss of $64.7 million in the first quarter. Our balance sheet remains a position of strength, ending the quarter with total liquidity of $940.3 million.

This consists of $635.3 million in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments, and $305 million of available capacity from our revolving credit facility, which remains undrawn. Our cash balance includes approximately $182.6 million in net proceeds from our June's common stock offering.

The capital raise positions us with substantial financial flexibility to invest in growth initiatives and accompanied a controlled block sale by insider stockholders. Capital expenditures for the second quarter were $24.8 million, up from $16.3 million sequentially, reflecting investments that enhance production capacity to drive our growth.

This includes test stand upgrades to support Alpha Block 2 and expansion of spacecraft manufacturing, which positions us to support NASA's accelerated lunar opportunities. Free cash flow was an outflow of $106.3 million compared with an outflow of $78.9 million in the first quarter.

The increase is primarily due to the final SciTec acquisition-related payment of approximately $24 million. We also closed the SpaceNG acquisition, which brings proven AI vision navigation and autonomous guidance systems, critical enabling technology for our Blue Ghost landers and Elytra orbiters.

This acquisition adds approximately 15 software engineers, and we view this as a strategic transaction that vertically integrates a key capability on a cost-neutral basis. Regarding our revenue outlook for 2026, we remain confident in our trajectory to achieve significant annual revenue growth this year, and reiterate the range of $420 million to $450 million.

The second quarter was an inflection point for Firefly. We crossed the $100 million revenue threshold for the first time in company history, while also achieving record backlog of $1.5 billion.

With over $940 million in total liquidity and clear line of sight to our revenue guidance for 2026, we have both the financial flexibility and operational momentum to continue scaling. As production ramps and operational efficiency improves, we expect to see corresponding expansion in gross margins and operating leverage.

We're building Firefly to be the definitive end-to-end space solutions provider, and the results you're seeing today are proof of that vision becoming reality. We remain intensely focused on disciplined execution and delivering long-term shareholder value.

Thank you for your continued confidence in Firefly, and with that, I'll turn the call back to Jason.

Thank you, Darren. Our record quarterly revenue is a testament to the focused execution of the Firefly team, and our multiple contract wins show how the significant tailwinds from the efforts like the Moonbase, Golden Dome, and assured access to space are turning into realities for our programs.

Firefly's strategic investments are paying dividends. SciTec is winning on more programs of record by leveraging our FORGE playbook repeatedly for additional phenomenologies and missions.

SpaceNG brings us greater vertical integration for more frequent, repeatable, and reliable spacecraft operations and landings. Expansion of our spacecraft campus and Rocket Ranch are fueling production efficiency and scaling of Alpha, Eclipse, Blue Ghost, and Elytra.

We are extending our global reach thanks to partners in the international markets such as Sweden and Japan as the strong launch capacity demand extends beyond just domestically. The moon opportunity is accelerating, and we're eager to apply our Blue Ghost playbook to larger landers for CLPS 2.0 to serve NASA's need for greater mass and volume to the lunar surface.

We've talked before about missions to orbit, the moon, and beyond. The beyond is here with our first Mars program, leveraging our moon capabilities and extending it.

Space is critical, and Firefly is a critical player in space. Thank you for joining today's call.

Michael, back to you.

Thank you, Jason. We will be attending multiple investor events in September, and we look forward to seeing many of you next month.

Operator, we're ready to take questions.

Good afternoon, Jason, Darren, Michael. Thank you so much for the time.

Maybe I could just start off on launch, two-part question if that's possible. You put out a press release noting the Lockheed Martin extension for two years to 2031 plus the hypersonic task order.

I guess how do we think about that? Then you noted Alpha 8 into Q4 from late summer and 10 to '27, I guess how's Alpha shaping up just given healthy demand in '27 as well and the ability for launch?

Thank you.

Yes, hi Sheila. The demand for launch is increasingly getting amplified.

This is the most constrained we've seen launch. There is strong demand that we see with Alpha.

We saw it at the Space Symposium, we saw it at Farnborough at the UK, as well as our BD team at Space Tide. There's a lot of strong demand from existing and new customers.

Referencing the Lockheed Martin extension, that's one of our existing customers. That just reaffirms Lockheed's confidence in our Block 2 Alpha.

It also reaffirms the 25 Alpha multi-launch services agreement. We continue to collaborate with Lockheed on our next flights.

We're even talking about offshore launches with combination with SeaGate and Lockheed Martin and Firefly to do more responsive launches. Then the confidential hypersonic task order 2, that's another confidence builder in Alpha Block 2.

Because we can launch not only 1 ton to orbit, but 2 tons to suborbital, that makes Alpha very uniquely suited to launch multiple hypersonic missiles at a time. There's a lot of economies of scale with that.

The second task order for the hypersonic missiles really helps burn down that rich backlog of hypersonic testing that is needed. Then we're seeing this with all the international customers we're talking to.

We're seeing this strong demand also with commercial customers. We're really excited about the progress we're making in our factory.

We're seeing record production from our factory. Carbon composites are providing tanks that are passing first-time quality.

We have Flight 8 that's in integration and test right now. We're getting ready for acceptance testing before we ship it to Vandenberg, and then do the static fire testing, integrate the payload, and then get ready for launch.

Then Flight 9 is entering the integration and test space as well because we are so rich with carbon composite tanks. The machine shop is also flowing.

We have a record number of Reaver chambers that are getting delivered to our Reaver engine integration and test, thanks to a lot of the labor and equipment utilization that is more efficient. Since May through August, we've seen our factory floor ramp up significantly.

Then we've got Flight 10 tanks that are completing, Flight 11 tanks are starting to get through their automated fiber placement machine production as well. The factory is just flowing at record pace.

Really, the demand is not the problem, the backlog is not the problem. It's really ramping up production so we can deliver the amount of Alpha rockets to meet the demand.

Can I follow up with, I guess, is it just ability to produce or is it the customer on the three launches from four in '26, and how should we think about 2027? Is it still 12 launches?

I've always mentioned that there's always risk with customer availability and regulatory approvals and range availability as well as weather. Those are things that we'll still be have to address, but are out of our control.

Those factors are things that we have to address for our Flight 8 and Flight 9. The production is just ramped up.

We are going to have several Alphas in this year. We're building ahead, as I mentioned, and that's giving us a good position for 2027 and beyond.

I mentioned before that a majority of our manifest for 2027 has already been sold out. That's another piece of data point that just shows the launch demand is amplified right now.

We're getting a lot of demand for more and more Alpha launches because it is the 1-ton rocket with orbital flight heritage that's active. Another thing that helps us in 2027 is we're going to bring online, in addition to our operational Vandenberg launch pad, we're going to bring online the Wallops launch pad in Virginia as well.

Then, as I mentioned before, in 2028, we'll be able to bring on our Swedish Space Corporation Sweden launch pad as well. We'll have two launch pads next year, three launch pads in 2028 to help with the launch cadence opportunities.

Awesome. Thank you so much.

Hey guys. This is Alex on for Seth.

Good afternoon.

Hi Alex.

Hey. Maybe a question for Darren.

Darren, I think in your prepared remarks, you mentioned how spacecraft revenue was $108 million in Q2, and if you kind of look at the growth on a sequential basis, it was around 60%, which is obviously a pretty big number. Curious, I know you mentioned among the drivers that there's the five lunar missions you guys are working on, strength in AI software, and I think there's also an acceleration of a hardware order.

I was curious if there's maybe a way that you could break that down a little bit more between those three pieces just to give us a sense of what drove that revenue strength?

Hey Alex, good to hear from you. There's definitely some puts and takes this quarter from a revenue mix and timing perspective, but the trajectory and the destination to $420 to $450 million in annual revenue remains the same.

I mentioned the hardware order that impacted the timing in the Q2, so that was an acceleration from a national security customer. One of the strengths in this business is really the diversified revenue streams from multiple product lines, right?

Look, there's really strong demand, as you can see, as evidenced on the spacecraft side as the team's working through five lunar lander programs in parallel right now. We're seeing similar strength in the AI software solutions that's really going to offset some of the revenue impact of launch, right?

What gives us a lot of confidence heading into the second half of the year is that we have 95% of our revenue booked for 2026 if you take the midpoint of our guidance.

Great. Then, as kind of a quick follow-up, Jason, I think you mentioned that you're maturing towards the first Eclipse flight, but I might have missed it, but I didn't hear an update on maybe updated expectations on when that may be.

Just curious if there is any update expectations in there?

Alex, again, I can't stress enough that the demand for launch capacity is amplified right now. We've never seen the launch capacity so constrained.

That not only helps the demand for Alpha, but also for Eclipse. Right now we are heads down, getting all the qualification completed for our Miranda engine.

Qualification is imminent. We just surpassed our 150th hot fire test, and what was very, very encouraging on this last hot fire was it was flight-like.

It was 226 seconds, which surpassed the full mission duty cycle duration of 206 seconds, and we got really great test results from that. That unlocks moving forward.

We're also building the Miranda flight engines in parallel. We're making progress there.

We've got a number of chambers for the Miranda engines. The forward bay, as I mentioned, has been qualified and tested.

Every hardware part of the first stage of Eclipse is either in build or in test. We've already qualified our tanks.

We continue to qualify them. We've got flight tanks also in build as well.

All that hardware, we're very hardware-rich at this time. We're making sure that everything's done with safety, quality, and reliability at the forefront.

The thing about this capability is it's going to unlock a lot of launch capacity in the future. We're working with Northrop Grumman on delivering the first stage no earlier than the next year.

This is an inaugural launch of no earlier than 2027. We did also complete COPVs in addition to the rocket engines, which are the hardest part of any rocket development.

The COPVs are extremely challenging and difficult for the industry as well, and we completed COPV burst press qualification campaign testing for the first stage. Then the hold-down release adapter, that's where rubber meets the road, that holds down the rocket before it launches.

That's a key piece of the ground infrastructure, and we're preparing to proof test that. Lots of exceptional progress.

Really proud of the team for all the progress that we're making. The factory floor is just really, really hardware-rich at this moment.

Awesome. Thanks very much, guys.

Hi. Thank you for taking our questions, and great seeing everyone in Farnborough.

First question, want to follow up on earlier point. Let's assume the next launch 4Q goes well, not asking for guidance for next year, but what kind of cadence are you kind of targeting if the next launch goes well?

Can you speak to that at all? Is it once a month, once a quarter, or twice a quarter, what kind of cadence?

Hey, good to hear from you Edison. We have so much hardware on the floor, the production is at an all-time high, so that gives us really, really high confidence that we're going to continue to pump out Alphas at rate.

As I mentioned, Alpha 8 is in final integration and test before we ship it. 9 is entering right behind it in integration and test.

10, all the airframes are completed. 11, the airframes are progressing.

That gives us a head start on getting ready for rate next year. That gives you an indication of what we're doing at this point, that kind of gives us a lot of optimism for next year.

The other thing is, we're not going to talk about guidance for 2027, but I mentioned the hardware production ramp, but the people part of it, our workforce successfully launched Flight 7. That was a lot of muscle memory and repetitions that they got from that, doing the static fire testing and then the launch itself, then doing the post-processing of the data, and they're getting faster and faster at doing that using advanced tools that we have in-house.

The goal is to launch Flight 8 successfully, get all the post-flight data, process that as soon as possible, let that flow into Flight 9 launch campaign, and continue that momentum into 2027 and beyond.

Gotcha. A separate topic, wanted to ask you about the moon, want to ask you about CLPS.

Can you give us a sense kind of what you're expecting for the rest of the year in terms of NASA awarding out task orders? Are we done with CLPS 1.0 and kind of waiting for 2.0?

Do we expect more from 1.0? Do we expect 2.0 by the end of the year?

Just kind of a flavor of should we expect some stuff to bid in and potentially win on some stuff before year-end?

We're never done with CLPS 1.0. There's three more opportunities in the second half of this year.

We already won, as we mentioned before, the CS-8 opportunity and we're on contract, and away we go because it's a near build-to-print of our successful Blue Ghost Mission 1, and we also went further vertically integrated with acquiring SpaceNG. That is moving along.

The opportunities ahead of us are two lander missions under CLPS 1.0 and then one orbiter imaging service under CLPS 1.0 as well. There are multiple shots and opportunities at goal for the rest of the year.

Because we invested in the capex to have quadruple the clean room space, put in the most optimized, streamlined assembly line that we could into that clean room, as well as expanded our spacecraft campus with vertically integrated components like avionics and harnessing, in-house engines as well, that gives us a really good position and extra capacity to take on more. We see the CS-8 win in second quarter as just the beginning.

It did put us in a category of we won not only that, but also the JPL Moonfall mission. That was two of the moon missions this year.

It expanded our number of moon missions in 2028 to three. That's a positive trend going from one mission a year to multiple missions a year, but that capacity in our hiring and staffing up is a good combination to go after more of these CLPS 1.0 missions.

Then CLPS 2.0 is also happening. We did put a bid in for that, and we had designs that we were working on for that, and we hope to hear from NASA in the coming months.

We're really excited about taking our success from the Blue Ghost Mission 1 and subsequent missions and applying it and extending it to a larger lander to take even more mass, even more volume to the moon so that we can be part of the infrastructure builds of the Moonbase.

Thank you very much.

Hey, good afternoon. On the guidance piece, what are the biggest swing factors that could cause revenue to shake out either at the high end or the low end of the guidance range?

Then given the unchanged range for the year, I think you were previously expecting four total Alpha launches in '26 and now you're expecting three, so that would imply that you were able to reiterate guidance without the maybe 15 or 20 million of revenue from that additional Alpha launch assuming the ASP is a bit higher than these next ones for Flight 10. Ex-Alpha, guidance would have increased, is that the right way to think about it?

Then, yeah, just maybe the swing factors for that range.

Hey Michael, good to hear from you. I think I touched on this a little bit earlier.

When you look at where we are from a guidance perspective, we reiterated 420 to 450, and some of the moving parts there, as I mentioned before, the trajectory of our growing revenue and the destination, which is between the 420 to 450 where we're going to be, we're going to land there. We have really strong confidence because the team's been executing.

You can see the momentum in Q2, but also heading into the second half of the year, as I mentioned, 95% of that revenue was already booked, it's just up to us in terms of execution. Where things can swing on the high end or low end, Jason touched on it a little bit earlier, if we wind up winning one of these additional CLPS missions in the end of the year, it could push us towards the higher end of the range.

Our business is really well diversified. There's multiple product lines that can generate revenue and continue to generate revenue.

You'll see that we work on the FORGE program for AI software solutions, the five lunar missions, Golden Dome, SVI, and we're really excited about some of the most recent wins in terms of G-BARD and Skyfall. That allows us to kind of offset some of the impact of the Alpha launch.

Great. Then on SciTec, maybe you could talk about what you saw there in the quarter and how revenue might be impacted from geopolitical tensions when there's a lot more activity.

Do customers pay more? Is it a function of higher demand during more activity?

Any color on the contract structure there and what was seen during the war?

I think you're seeing strong demand on that side of the house, and you can see that we had an hardware order that got accelerated in Q2, and request by our national security customer. In terms of the geopolitical tensions, that's really been an area where there's really strong demand in that product line.

Maybe I'll let Jason comment on some of the geopolitical parts of it.

Michael. The conflicts have not gotten any better.

We see a lot of the Iran conflict earlier in the year and that continues. It's the most missile conflict that we've seen in the history.

In the first 30 days, if you remember FORGE earlier this year processed over thousands of threat messages. That was just in the first few weeks.

The problem is continuing, and it's not just in one region, it's global as well. Missile threats are getting more advanced.

Because of those reasons, we need more AI capability, more battle space awareness, more tactical intelligence, more tactical missile warning, missile tracking, and strategic missile warning and tracking. Those are all things that the purpose of FORGE is to provide that kind of AI software support to the Guardians and force multiply each one of them so that we can keep our nation safe and our allies safe.

We only see more acceleration of those type of capabilities because of this threat emerging.

Thanks so much.

Hey, good evening everyone. Jason, Darren, Michael, you've clearly seen strong order momentum across your portfolio.

I was wondering as you convert these new awards into revenue, can you help us understand the profitability and cash milestones associated with that backlog, especially for some of these capabilities where you've already proven the technology? How do these margins and cash flow typically evolve as these new orders convert into revenue?

Hey Kristine, good to hear from you. Q2 is a great example, right?

When you look at the $117 million in terms of revenue, we converted pretty much all of that was from backlog conversion, and we're on contracts. A lot of our contracts, primarily on the spacecraft side, are milestone driven, we're getting cash, and that allows us to build out our teams and buy long-lead items to support the programs for our customers as we progress through each one.

On top of that, after we close some of these contracts, let's say the Blue Ghost orders from NASA, for example, these lunar missions really have bolt-on opportunities, as Jason talked about, that allows us to expand gross margins, whether they're from commercial payloads or from imaging services like Ocula, which I would expect to be much higher gross margins. Then from a gross margin perspective, as we unlock Alpha as cadence increases, I would expect a corresponding increase in gross margin there.

That's really the big unlock for gross margin going forward.

Great, super helpful. I guess you kind of partially answered my follow-up question.

I guess can you level set us in terms of how do we think about the path to positive EBITDA as a whole for the company and free cash flow breakeven? I guess specifically, is there some sort of level of revenue as you convert some of those specific milestones that you get to where either it's a mix, scale, fixed cost absorption, or more profitable contracts leveling through where you can actually get to that profitability and positive free cash?

Really so much of our business is driven by these operational milestones, our operational milestones really drive our financials. Things I look at as everyone else is looking at is Alpha, getting Alpha at rate and cadence, right?

Eclipse development, finishing up Eclipse development, that takes a lot off the R&D line. We're excited about the ramp of our spacecraft business.

It's progressing really well. There's a really high demand there for that business, whether it's our Blue Ghost lander, Elytra vehicle, or on the AI software solutions side, right?

That positions us really well for profitability in the future.

Great, thank you very much.

Hey, thanks for the question. Maybe following up on the supply demand environment, if we could talk a little bit about Eclipse, how much the national security customer are talking about essentially kind of releasing some of the requirements on NSSL on-ramp, and how do you kind of think about Eclipse's prospects of getting early on-ramps to NSSL?

Thank you.

Hey Colin, nice to hear from you. We're just heads down right now on our Eclipse program.

We are going through qualification of Miranda and testing, getting the test data to inform our flight builds as well. Same thing with the tanks, the LOX, RP tanks, and getting to a point where we can deliver the first stage to our co-developer Northrop Grumman.

Northrop Grumman leads the government-facing work like NSSL. We're confident that our co-developed Eclipse rocket is American made, and meets the standards and needs of the US Space Force.

It's an ideal solution to deploy a broad range of payloads with such critical payloads that the Space Force demands. We're just working towards our first launch, showing the capability, because at the end of the day, what matters the most is delivering the payload to the mission orbit that we sign up for, and that's what we're focused on.

As I said before, the demand for launch capacity is the most constrained we've seen it. There's strong, strong demand both on the National Security Space Launch program side, as well as commercial and international.

As long as we continue to just focus on our first launch and get that vital data and then continue on, that's where we're focusing.

Got it. Then, maybe on that same kind of topic, if you could discuss the pricing elements of the launch services agreement extension with Lockheed, essentially how do we think about that current list versus current list price, and how much of that pricing increase would you kind of attribute to hypersonics mix or other international security factors, second stage relight, on-orbit maneuverability, or the like?

Thank you.

Hey Colin, good to hear from you. Just overall Alpha pricing, Jason talked about the launch-constrained environment, we'd expect our Alpha ASPs to go up over time.

In the early years now and in the next 6 to 12 months, we're burning down some of our earlier backlog, you'll see some of those lower ASP missions burn off. I would expect our prices to go up as in a launch-constrained environment.

Hi, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions.

First for me, wanted to jump back to the CLPS opportunity. You mentioned that you submitted a proposal for a larger lander variant to the Blue Ghost.

Curious if we can hear any more details on that. Are we talking 500-kilogram payload capacity, a ton?

Is there any more color you could provide there?

Hey Griffin. The thing I could say right now, because we can't release any proprietary information, but what the NASA Moonbase program announced in March as part of their innnitiation program was they wanted 30 landers in the next three years, and the first 15 were going to be nominal landers, and that's anywhere between the hundreds of kilograms to the surface of the moon, but they also wanted an additional 12 landers that around the 2 to 4 ton kind of capability, and then another 13 landers for the 8-ton kind of down mass.

We have a scalable design that's modular, that we can take different cargo to support human presence in the future. You're going to need power, you're going to need navigation and guidance, communications, cargo to sustain life, rovers, light terrain vehicles, all the above.

We have a design that takes a lot of the common components that be successfully landed on the moon already with, but scales it in terms of size, volume, and mass so we can take those Moonbase infrastructure cargo reliably. We're talking the multi-ton kind of capability.

Super helpful. Thanks for that, Jason.

Then just one more if I could. I was hoping we could touch back on tactically responsive space, and specifically where your work with True Anomaly stands.

I believe, or at least it was our understanding, that Firefly was originally supposed to launch that Victus Haze mission, but of course, as we saw, Rocket Lab handled that launch. Curious if you could just give an update there specifically with your work with True Anomaly?

We are very bullish on tactically responsive space. If you look at the Space Force budget, it could double from 2025 to 2026 to 2027 numbers.

With that, the tactically responsive space line could quadruple. That's how important and critical this is.

We are not just doing demonstration missions. In the future, we'll do operational missions because this capability is really to meet the needs of urgent and priority missions for the Space Force.

It's also to deter US adversaries in space. We're delighted that there's multiple providers of this capability in addition to us.

We were the first to do it within a 24-hour timeline, but there's going to be more and more. That's something we've always envisioned along with the Space Force.

The Space Force, at their direction of the Space Safari, moved our future tactically responsive space mission that will utilize our upgraded Alpha Block 2 launch vehicle to launch True Anomaly's Jackal in the future. This new mission will build on the lessons learned of Victus Nox, and we also did Victus Diem earlier this year, now the lessons learned from the successful Victus Haze and others that will foresee in the future to shape the next generation of tactically responsive space missions.

Okay. If I'm still on here, I just want to clarify then what you said.

Does that mean there's no change in your responsive space pipeline, just that mission, it went to Rocket Lab, but you have another mission lined up in the future then? That mission is not lost, it's just saved for a later date?

Is that the right way to think about it?

That's the right way to think about it: saved for a later date per the Space Force direction.

Okay. All right, great.

Thank you for taking my questions. I appreciate it.

Hey, this is Ben calling for David. Going back to the CLPS missions, with all the awards you have now and more awards to come, how should we think about this accelerated Blue Ghost cadence's impact on Blue Ghost margins?

Is there a certain rate that we really feel like an inflection with margins there?

I'll take that one. Obviously with more Blue Ghost and spacecraft missions, that kind of spreads out that fixed manufacturing overhead we have in the business.

We'd expect that our gross margins to continue to expand. On top of that, you're looking at in addition to the base contract that we've won from NASA, there's opportunity for commercial providers for additional payloads from commercial providers, and then I talked about the Ocula imaging service as well, right?

Those can provide gross margin expansion opportunities.

Got it, thanks. Then switching over to SciTec, how should we think about the contract mix going forward?

I think you've talked about trying to do more fixed price there.

I think the way to look at it is our mix of spacecraft and launch for the rest of this year, you're probably looking at somewhere in 85% spacecraft and the remainder launch. That's how I'd view it.

I would add that the whole acquisition of SciTec has been very successful. One of the things that we look at is not only strategy and culture and financials, but also synergies, and our larger Firefly platform has been able to successfully unlock a lot of the synergies of 1 + 1 = 4 kind of moments with SciTec.

You saw that with the Golden Dome award announcement in second quarter,

and also most recently the G-BARD program. That's a $94 million phase one early phase program to look at the legacy radars that do missile warning, missile tracking, and space domain awareness, and then modernize that.

We're taking the FORGE playbook that's so successful and already battle tested and getting superior ratings from all the generals in the Pentagon. We're taking that and we're extending it, lifting and shifting it to other adjacent missions and phenomenologies like radar.

You could look at upside opportunities like air moving target indication and ground moving target indication and more. There's a lot of upside opportunities with what used to be the Space Development Agency in terms of the tracking layer tranches and the ground processing there.

Then there's more Golden Dome upside opportunities as well. FORGE has become a really large part of what we're going to do in the future with SciTec.

Hi Jason, hi Darren, hi Michael. Apologies for the background noise here.

Congrats on the progress. The backlog number, Darren, $1.5 billion, any colors there?

How much of that is launch versus spacecraft, and maybe also how much is covering the next 12 months to understand the near-term versus longer-term backlog?

Hey Suji, good to hear from you. We haven't really broken that out, but when you look at it from a conversion perspective, this quarter $117.7 million pretty much all of that was backlog conversion.

When you look at that and kind of extrapolate where our $1.5 billion lands, you kind of see how far that stretches out. It's not exactly apples-to-apples because you have things like the Lockheed Martin multi-launch agreement mixed in there that extends through 2031, it's not as straightforward an answer, but you can give a rough ballpark by extrapolating Q2.

Okay. Got it.

Yes, very high conversion. Great.

Then second question is on Elytra. Can you update us on the demand backlog there and pipeline, and maybe how much Elytra is contributing to revenue in the next second half this year or next year just to understand how that's coming into the revenue mix?

Hey Suji. I'd like to unpack that in two parts.

Maybe I'll start with the first part, which is the demand. You already see that we have an Elytra on contract with the Defense Innovation Unit.

That's clearly supporting space domain awareness and rendezvous proximity operations, and it's very, very aligned with the White House executive order for space supremacy where they're looking to advance capabilities for Department of War as well as involved commercial technology. We're doing all those things with our Sinequanone mission.

That's progressing towards a launch no earlier than next year. Then in addition to that, each Blue Ghost 2, 3, 4 will have an Elytra transfer vehicle that will transfer the lander to their destination on the moon surface, but also serve as a long-haul communications relay and also host our commercially available Ocula imaging and mapping service.

Those Elytras are progressing, as on Blue Ghost Mission 2. We're stacking our Elytra, so that's the progress we're making there.

Then Moonfall, we were put on contract by Jet Propulsion Laboratory for this flagship Moonbase program that's moving really, really quickly because we have several Elytras in production. We're able to leverage the designs and the manufacturing and the supply chain for that vehicle, and that gives us confidence of meeting that very stringent schedule.

Everything you need to do to go successfully burn several times to get to the moon to deploy those JPL drones is similar stuff that the Space Force needs to deploy high-value national security kind of constellations from GTO to GEO. We responded to a request for information recently, and we're progressing along with sharing information on our Elytra transfer vehicle to serve that fast transfer vehicle mission.

That's a new category that we want to continue working with the Space Force on.

I'd also add, singling out the Elytra missions by itself, while we're very excited about these contracts that Jason talked about, including Moonfall, which will go $75 million going through 2028, really doesn't do that product justice because when you look at it, Blue Ghost Mission 2 has an Elytra orbiter on there, right? That contract in itself is a part of Elytra, and that allows us to really just leverage every R&D dollar on there and be really efficient about how we produce these vehicles.

Great. Appreciate the color.

Thanks Darren, thanks Jason.

Thank you all for attending today's call. We look forward to speaking with you all again when we report our third quarter results.

Have a good one.