Good morning, and thank you all for joining us today. After a third quarter that was marked by political instability with its consequent monetary and exchange rate tensions, the results of the midterm legislative elections reaffirmed support for the government's fiscal reform and orderly policy.

This translated into a rapid normalization of financial variables, which returned to pre-event levels. BBVA Argentina continues to consolidate its growth strategy, reflecting its commitment to being a key player in Argentina's recovery of activity.

This was achieved despite a year ultimately marked by interest rate volatility in the second half and a progressive deterioration of credit quality within specific segments of the retail portfolio. In this line, on December 22, 2025, the bank secured a credit line of up to $150 million from the International Finance Corporation.

These funds allow BBVA to expand its financing capacity for small and medium-sized enterprises, thereby reaffirming its commitment to the productive sector. BBVA Argentina's nonperforming loan ratio on private loans reached 4.18% as of December 2025, a figure that remains below the system average of 5.29% for the same period.

The bank stands out for having consistently lower delinquency ratios than the sector average, which reflects the quality of its credit risk management and its prudent approach to portfolio origination. Before diving into numbers, it is important to mention that on December 10, 2025, the transaction through which BBVA Argentina acquired 50% of the share capital of FSCA Compañía Financiera has been closed.

This had a 1 billion peso impact in the P&L, and all balance sheet figures include FSCA, including loans and deposits. Nonetheless, market shares expressed in this report and on this call do not include FSCA, as the consolidation was made as of the last day of December.

Moving to slides 2 to 5 of the webcast presentation, I will now comment on the bank's fourth quarter 2025 and 2025 fiscal year financial results. BBVA Argentina's inflation-adjusted net income in 2025 was 267.4 billion pesos, decreasing 43.2% versus 2024.

This implied an accumulated ROE of 7.3% and accumulated ROA of 1.1%. The year-over-year decline in results is mainly explained by the deterioration of loan loss allowances in a context of high delinquency ratios in the financial system.

Also, in spite of observing a 29.4% lower net interest income as a result of lower interest rates and inflation, this should be considered in comparison to lower losses from the net monetary position, which more than offset the lower NII. It is worth noting the 36.9% increase in net fee income, thanks to a proactive approach in improvements, and also in foreign currency and gold gains, the latter explained by an increase in activity after the partial lift in FX controls on April 14, 2025.

In the fourth quarter of 2025, net income was 59.3 billion pesos, increasing 44.5% quarter-over-quarter. This implied a quarterly ROE of 6.5% and a quarterly ROA of 0.9%.

Quarterly results were mainly explained by higher income along with lower expenses. Increase in income is mainly due to: 1, better net interest income; and 2, an increase in results from write-down of assets at amortized cost and OCI, the latter due to the sale of bonds classified in the OCI model.

Expenses improved mainly on the side of personnel expenses and administrative expenses. These were negatively offset by: 1, loan loss allowances; 2, an increase in operating expenses mainly due to turnover tax; and 3, lower net fee income in the quarter.

Net income from the net monetary position was 32% higher quarter-over-quarter, explained by a higher quarterly inflation. Net interest income in the quarter was 758.9 billion pesos, increasing 20.2% quarter-over-quarter.

After the uncertainty surrounding the midterm elections were off, average market interest rates declined. With liabilities repricing at a faster pace than assets, we observed the reverse effect from the one seen in the third quarter of 2025, with income from public securities and loans increasing and expenses from funding increasing, but to a much lower extent.

In the year, net interest income decreased 29.4%, as mentioned before, more than offset by the lower losses on the side of the net results from the net monetary position. Loan loss allowances increased 31.3% in the quarter and 181.2% accumulated year-over-year, explained by the deterioration of nonperforming loans, in particular on the retail book, which implied higher provisioning.

The effect of loan loss allowances can be observed in the evolution of the cost of risk, which reached 8.11% in the fourth quarter of 2025 and 5.54% on an annual basis. During 2025, personnel and administrative expenses decreased by 11% and 12.6% respectively.

This was achieved thanks to the active pursuit of efficiencies during the year. During the fourth quarter of 2025 in particular, total operating expenses were 537.5 billion pesos, remaining stable quarter-over-quarter.

Both the efficiency ratio as well as the fee-to-expenses ratio evidence the stability and the improvements that are taking place on these lines of the income statement, and we expect them to improve even further for 2026. Going on to slides 6 and 7, private sector loans as of the fourth quarter of 2025 totaled 14.8 trillion pesos, increasing 7.6% in real terms quarter-over-quarter and 47.6% year-over-year.

In the quarter, growth was mainly driven by an increase in loans in pesos. In total currency, the products that increased the most were mostly commercial loans, such as financing of projects and exports and discounted instruments.

On the peso portfolio, discounted instruments, pledge loans, and credit cards stood out. Pledge loans are mainly affected by the introduction of FSCA into the loan book.

In the case of consumer loans, prudency policies taken in a context of higher deterioration of nonperforming loans were noticeable on this line with a 2.2% quarter-over-quarter decline. BBVA Argentina's consolidated market share of private sector loans reached 11.91% as of the fourth quarter of 2025, improving 64 basis points from 11.27% a year ago.

As for asset quality, the NPL ratio of BBVA Argentina on private loans reached 4.18% as of December 2025. As mentioned before, BBVA is renowned for presenting delinquency ratios consistently below the sector average, which reflects the quality of its credit risk management and its prudent approach to portfolio origination.

By the end of 2025, total gross loans and other financing over deposits ratio was 88%, above the 78% in December 2024. Participation of total loans over assets is 57%, the highest since 2020 and above the 51% recorded in 2024.

As of the fourth quarter of 2025, the total NIM was 17.5%, higher than the 15.2% in the third quarter of 2025 and below the 20.2% in the fourth quarter of 2024. While the NIM in pesos increased by 277 basis points to 20.2% quarter-over-quarter, the NIM in dollars fell 91 basis points to 4.8%.

In the quarter, the increase in NIM is mainly explained by a better yield on public securities and loans in pesos, while the drop in dollar NIM is explained by a higher volume and rate of interest-bearing liabilities. In the accumulated annual comparison, although the total NIM presents a considerable drop, it should be understood that this is a consequence of the rapid decrease in inflation and therefore the level of rates, and is more than offset by the lower cost of inflation adjustment.

This can be seen in the adjusted NIM, which dropped from 17.30% to 13.75%. On the funding side, as of the fourth quarter of 2025, total private deposits reached 16.7 trillion pesos, increasing 3.1% quarter-over-quarter and 29.7% year-over-year.

The bank's consolidated market share of private deposits as of the fourth quarter of 2025 reached 10.04% from 8.60% a year ago. Private non-financial sector deposits in pesos totaled 10.5 trillion pesos, a decrease of 1.4% quarter-over-quarter, explained by a decrease in time deposits and in other deposits, including interest-bearing checking accounts.

This effect was partially offset by an increase in savings accounts. Private non-financial sector deposits in foreign currency expressed in pesos increased by 11.6% quarter-over-quarter.

This is mainly due to an increase in savings accounts and in time deposits. In hard currency, US dollar loans increased 12.7% quarter-over-quarter and 26.6% year-over-year.

As of the fourth quarter of 2025, capital ratio reached 18.3%. The quarterly increase in the ratio was due to a 9.4% increase in common equity Tier 1, mainly impacted by the recovery in the value of government bonds at fair value through OCI.

Public sector exposure excluding central bank totaled 3.9 trillion pesos, implying a 15.5% exposure, below the 16.4% recorded in the third quarter of 2025 and 17.9% in the fourth quarter of 2024. For the year, the drop in exposure is mainly explained by the increase in assets led by the growth of loans over that of financial instruments.

It is important to highlight that more than 90% of the national treasury's public debt portfolio in pesos is at TAMAR floating rate. These bonds represent approximately 65% of the bank's sovereign portfolio, and in the context of higher real interest rates in the second half of the year, added value to the financial margin.

In the quarter, the liquidity ratio reached a level of 44.2%. The liquidity ratio in local and foreign currency reached 37.7% and 55.2% respectively.

In line with our commitment of generating value for our shareholders, the bank continued the payment of dividends corresponding to the 2024 fiscal year in 10 installments, having paid nine of the 10 installments required by the central bank's regulation up to the date of this report. This concludes our prepared remarks.

We will now take your questions. Operator, please open the line for questions.

Hi, good morning. Thank you for the call and taking my question.

Guess my main question is really on asset quality and how that continues to evolve and what that could mean for loan growth for 2026. We kind of expected already that we're still not out of the credit cycle.

It seemed provisions jumped a bit more than expected, NPLs went up a bit. Do you still think 1Q, 2Q should be the worst of it?

Do you think that can get delayed and the credit cycle can last a bit longer? Just want to understand how comfortable you feel on credit quality stabilizing and potentially improving, and what could that mean for loan growth?

You have pretty good loan growth in the quarter, but is there some risk to your ability to grow loans if credit quality does not improve? Thank you.

Hi, Tito. Good morning.

Hi, everyone. This is Carmen Morillo.

Thank you for your question. Related to asset quality, growth, and, yeah, we think that these are main questions for this year.

I would like to highlight that during 2025, we have been able to gain market share in a quite solid way, this 11.91% market share. That means 60 basic points increase in market share, is quite solid.

In terms of credit risk, we've been under the system ratios. Having said that, we believe that first quarter will be also a tough one.

From then on, what we believe is that credit indicators should go downwards. For us, the peak should be in first quarter in terms of NPLs for sure, and in terms of cost of risk also.

In terms of growth, maybe it's too soon to answer this question. What we believe is that depending on what the financial system growth is, what we still believe is that our strategy is to gain market share.

We see the credits in the system growing around 18% in real terms. We should be growing above that.

Our guidance was to grow between 25% and 30% for the 2026, and we think it's too early to change our guidance. We would maintain these figures to grow faster than the system.

Also in terms of deposits. We believe that our strategy is the good one in that sense.

We've been growing also in deposits during 2025. We've been able to have a better participation in the transactionality of our clients and in that sense, we will be also beating the system in deposits.

I hope I could have answered your question. Thank you.

No, that's helpful, Carmen. Thank you for that.

I guess, how do you think that then translates to profitability for 2026? Do you think you can achieve a double-digit ROE?

Can you start getting to the low teens by the end of the year, or does that also get delayed a bit and we could see some pressure on profitability? Thank you.

Okay.

I think we have been very consistent in our guidance in terms of ROE. We were talking about low to mid-teens for the last quarters.

It's, as I mentioned and all of the environment is not so easy to predict. We think it's early to change this guidance.

We are confidence we will be able to achieve a better profitability than the one we have done this year, which, by the way, is much better than the system's one and other peers. We are happy with that performance in relative terms.

Of course, we have faced a lot of difficulties this year, and I think the year is a very positive one in this environment. For next year, we hope to be low to mid-teens, too early to say low or mid-teens, but I believe we should be achieving this goal.

Great. Thank you very much, Carmen.

You're welcome.

Hi, Carmen and team. Thank you for the opportunity.

Carmen, I wanted to maybe expand a bit on deposits, because I think your market share gains were very relevant. You're above the double-digit maybe for the first time in some time, I think it's a very important point.

Just wanted to see your strategy, right, because I think given the conditions that are very tight, maybe the competition for funding intensifies, no? Just wanted to ask you, what's your strategy here, and how do you prevent maybe a spike in the cost of funding?

Hi, Brian. This is Diego Cesarini.

I will take this question. It's true, we have been growing on deposits much faster than the system.

Last year, we grew 32% in real terms, while the system grew around 12%, our gains in market share have been huge. Here, we have been working on many fronts.

On one side, we have seen a recovery on retail deposits. Retail time deposits, for example, represented a couple of years ago before Milei took over and before the 2023 presidential elections, represented around 30% of our deposits in pesos.

After a year and a half, they just represented 10%. Last year, we started to see a recovery in the investors appetite for bringing to that kind of deposits, we put a lot of focus on trying to make them grow faster.

Now they represent around 15%. We have also been very active on companies, on SMEs deposits.

We were out of that market a couple of years ago because we didn't need that funding. We are back on that market.

We are putting a lot of aggressive targets to our working commercial forces. We have also succeeded a lot in growing very fast on SMEs deposits.

I guess that the last leg of this strategy are wholesale deposits, institutionals. They still represent a huge amount of Argentinean market.

Again, two years ago, we didn't need those deposits. After we started growing, well, we were going for them again.

We are on every front, and of course in dollar deposits, we have also been growing market share. We are also active on that market.

We still think that we have room to keep growing there.

No, thank you. Super clear.

Then a follow-up on Tito's question just to summarize. Basically, you're envisioning growth, as Carmen was saying, 25% to 30% in real terms.

I don't know if you could elaborate a bit on the composition, because I know you're a bit more on the commercial side in terms of the mix, right? The deposits, do you think they grow above or in line with loans?

ROE, you mentioned already maybe low double digits. Then I have maybe another question on asset quality.

Do you think cost of risk could be at some point, maybe at the end of 2026, closer to the end of 2024, which is closer to the 5% rather than the 7%, no?

Starting with your --

No.

Starting with your latest questions, yes, we think that by the end of this year, it could be reaching the 2024 levels. Of course, it will start at levels that are similar to the end of last year, as Carmen said before.

Regarding the composition of our portfolio, I think that maybe in general terms, it will be similar to the one that we have right now. Of course, at the beginning of the year, probably during the first semester, we will be much more focused on big corporations because, well, for obvious reasons, that the retail market is still not recovering.

Probably consumer loans or credit card loans could suffer a little during the first part of the year, and probably in the second semester, things would return to normality.

The point is when the situation in the retail side is safe enough to come back to credit cards and personal loans and all that. Having said that, we will be in mortgages, in pledge loans.

In the retail side, we see these products as the main ones in our strategy at the beginning of the year. Then, of course, as the situation gets better, we will be back in all products as we used to be.

In the commercial side, we are not expecting a higher deterioration, and that's why we think we will maintain, as Diego was mentioning, the mix we have nowadays.

No, super clear. On the deposits, just to clarify, do you expect to grow above or below the loan growth?

The loan -- so...

Above or below what?

The loan growth. No?

No, I guess that below loan growth.

The system. Yes,

above the system probably, but below loan growth, just because, well, of course, equity also grows. There are other liabilities that also grow, we need to grow less in percentage terms in deposits than in loans.

That's just mathematics. As I said before, we still think that we have room to grow.

Even if deposits were behaving not so good this year, we still are liquid. We still have bonds in excess.

We have a public sector portfolio in excess of what we need to comply with reserve requirements, we still could use some liquidity in order to keep growing.

Perfect. If we think of let's say a 20% real terms in deposits, that makes sense, right?

Yes, between 15% and 20% could make sense in a scenario where we grow in loans between 25% and 30%.

Super clear. Thank you, team.

In both cases, the strategy is to gain market share. It will depend on what the system does.

Perfect. Thank you.

You're welcome.

Hello, Carmen, Diego, Belén. First, congratulations on the good result and the gains in market share, which is what you wanted to achieve, and the stability of the results.

To ask a few things which are different. First, the dividend for 2025, do you expect it to be able to pay in a single or a discrete number of payments, or will you still have these 10 different payments that you have had in 2024?

What level of payment are you thinking of doing? Second, on taxes, when you look at the last three years, you've been paying about 34% on average over the last three years.

Is that a level that you expect for the future, or should we go back to the statutory rate around 30%? Finally, can you give us an update about when we might move away from inflation accounting?

Is that 2028, or do we have to wait longer? Thank you.

Hi, Carlos. Thank you for your words.

Then related to your questions, first one was dividends. We still don't know how are we going to be able to pay the dividends.

I don't have an answer on that question. We believe we need to have information during March, I would say.

We will know that soon. Related to the amount, we ended in this capital ratio of 18.3% 2025.

As I mentioned, we want to grow for the next years. We will be paying dividend, but it will be something similar to what we did last year.

To maintain a lower payout ratio and grow faster. Then, your second question -- Inflation accounting.

It was about the taxes and inflation. By the way, what was the payout in the end last year?

Sorry?

Last year payout...

The payout last year.

...was around 25% of our 2024 net income.

25%, okay.

That was last year dividend.

Yeah. Then inflation, a couple of months ago, we were thinking about 2027, by the end of 2027 to be the end of this adjustment.

Now we changed a little bit our projections of inflation, I think it would be prudent to say that 2028 should be the year to go out of this adjustment, but it will be, yeah, end 2027, beginning of 2028, something like that.

Carlos, just to add a piece of information, according to the FX regulation that is in place, we could access in theory to the official FX market to pay dividends this year.

Yes, right.

Okay. Then in terms of taxes, you were asking, I don't see a reason why they should come back to other percentages.

I don't have here the information, let me take a look on that and come back to you.

Sure.

I believe we should be at that levels, but if we see something else, I will come to you. At

that level, meaning the 30% statutory? Because as I said, this year this year almost every quarter you have had 34% to 41% in my numbers, maybe I'm doing something wrong.

No, I mean 35%, around

35%.

Yeah.

Around 35%. Okay.

Typically,

it should be around 35%.

35%. Okay.

Thank you.

Hello, team. Thank you for taking my question.

Wanted to ask on cost. How should we think about personal and administrative expenses during this year?

Hi, Pedro. Thank you for your question.

This year meaning 2026, I believe?

Yes.

The improvement we've seen during this year, we believe we will be also improving in 2026. The trend should continue, not only in terms of being quite aggressive in not growing in expenses, but also due to our better net interest margin, fees and commissions, and so on.

The efficiency ratio should go downwards.

Okay. Do you have a target on the efficiency ratio for the year?

40 --

around 46%.

Perfect. Thank you.

You're welcome.

Hi. Good afternoon.

How's everyone? I have a question as we've seen in the first quarter, dollar liquidity in the system is improving, and government is signaling to probably changing regulation in dollar lending to non-dollar producing clients.

How do you see BBVA in this field? Do you intend to lend in USD to non-dollar producing clients?

Which sectors do you think would be best?

Hi, Matías. This is Diego.

I would like to say that in the case of BBVA, we are pretty comfortable with the amount of lending we are producing in dollars right now with the current regulation. We are growing.

We have a lot of demand in our pipeline, if you ask me, by the end of this quarter, even if we are growing a lot in deposits, another kind of dollar funding, we would really be short of liquidity. We are gaining market share in loans, and everything is being done under current regulation.

We are not in the need of a change in this regulation. Having said this, if regulation changes and opens to more sectors, of course we have to evaluate very carefully the sectors.

It's difficult to establish a general policy because we all have in mind what happened in Argentina 25 years ago where dollar lending was opened for anyone. That kind of unhedged are very difficult to manage in case of devaluation.

This is basically our view of the situation. If the regulation changes, we will analyze if there are any sectors specifically or special cases where we can relax a little our policy.

I think that the most important is that we are really lending at full with the current policy. Right now, we don't need a change.

In our case, we don't need a change in regulation. Besides, when you look at the loan-to-deposit ratios in foreign currency, you will see that in our case, right now is around 55%, probably will be 60% in a couple of months.

Then reserve requirements are really high in this currency, are around 23%. We also have to keep banknotes in our branches.

Of course it's a public information that banks have faced very sudden and deep runs on our deposits many years ago, we still have to be very careful regarding our customers' behaviors in this kind of deposits. We still have to keep important amounts of liquidity in dollar terms.

Central bank cannot lend dollars to banks in case of need. This is our approach to this subject.

Thank you. A follow-up question.

Do you have a guidance in net interest margin for 2026?

We do not have a formal guidance on net interest margin, but we think that we like to measure this indicator in real terms, because, of course, if you compare 2024 to 2025, the net interest margin fell, but of course because inflation fell and interest rates also decreased very sharply. On the other side of our balance sheet in our net income, you see that the cost of inflation also decreases a lot.

You have to see this in net terms. In general terms, we have seen that last year, we didn't lost margin.

Our net margins was similar to the previous year, and for next year, for 2026, we are seeing a similar situation. Probably our net interest margin will fall a little in real terms.

That will be offset by growth in activity. This is not an issue for now for the bank.

Great. Thank you so much.

Hi. Sorry, I was having trouble with my microphone before.

I wanted to ask in first place about personal expenses. How is explained the decrease in this quarter while headcount has increased?

Then about your guidance, I wanted to know if you could share the assumptions behind that guidance about inflation, GDP growth in 2026, and FX. The last one is do you know about how much of the growth in loans and deposits is in pesos and in dollars?

Thank you.

Okay. Thank you, Marcos, for the questions.

Related to the first one, personal expenses, yeah, there's some provisions we decided to return, and that's why it's true, no, that you see a different evolution between headcount and expenses. It's a one-off.

This is the short answer for that. Then related to the guidance, I think -- Yes.

Regarding inflation, our research department is expecting a 22%. Regarding GDP, 3% growth, and regarding FX, around 1,700.

Regarding the mix in growth in loans and pesos and dollars, we are still expecting dollar loans to grow a little above peso loans. Dollar loans right now represent around 23% of our book.

Probably that will reach 25%, 27%, dollar growth should be around 40% probably in real terms or a little more.

Thank you. Just one question.

Do you think that the personal expenses charge of this quarter can be adjusted by inflation in order to project the followings or which number could be a normalized number?

I'm not sure if I get your question right, Marcos, sorry.

If you think that the personal expenses charge of this quarter in order to project it, will it grow as inflation grows or which growth do you expect for that charge?

I would say that, first, efficiency ratio is going to be lower than this year. Second, the growth in expenses as a whole should be very linked to inflation.

With this couple of --

Okay.

Okay?

Thank you. Thank you very much.

You're welcome.

Hi, team. Thank you for taking the question.

Just wanted to ask you because everyone, I think not only you, but other peers have been mentioning about the potential recovery of the consumer. Just wanted to ask you your view, what are the catalysts here for us to see a recovery, and also for them to start, as you mentioned, no, recovering not only in the demand of credit, but also maybe on deposits?

I think that would be great color. Thank you.

Thank you for the question. The short answer should be interest rates need to be stable and lower.

That's one issue, which is important. The other one is the stability, macro policies are going in the right direction, and we believe this is in the right path.

We still need to see what happens with the companies, with the retail, with the salaries in real terms. It's more complicated than only interest rates.

We believe something else need to be happening in the country to go back to consumer loans.

Thank you, Carmen. Anything on the regulatory side that you think could really help on either side, either supply or demand of credit?

A lot of the bad regulations have already been addressed, but of course everybody is aware that last year, central bank monetary policy was very restrictive. Our reserve requirements skyrocketed.

I think that probably we will need some flexibility on that side from central bank in order to keep growing, and we think that that will come with time. I think that right now, of course, inflation has gone a little above the expected levels, but once that issue is again under track, I think that the central bank is going to act and start to be less restrictive.

I think that's the main issue right now.

Thank you, team.

Welcome.

Welcome.

Do you hear me?

Okay. Hi, Carmen, Diego.

My question was regarding reserve requirements, but Diego just answered that, it was if you are expecting or seeing the central bank lowering those, but you mentioned that it will depend on the evolution of inflation. Sorry, it was already answered, and thank you very much.

Yes, I can elaborate a little more. Let me tell you that in the case of reserve requirements, what central bank did last year, they raise, of course, these levels, but we can comply those requirements in bonds, it doesn't represent a cost for our NIM.

It's not affecting our net income, of course. Of course, we need those funds in order to keep growing in loans if there is enough demand.

Besides that, we are asking for a little more flexibility because, last August, we had to comply with those requirements on a daily basis. From the operational side, it was very difficult for us.

They have relaxed somewhat those daily requirements. Still there are some minor issues that we think that should be addressed.

We are asking, but that doesn't have really an impact on net income. That's the general view on the subject.

Okay. Thank you.

Diego, one more question. Do you think that wallets and fintechs, well, banks already won the battle of salaries and being deposited in banks, but do you think that they will eventually strike back to that to potentially reverse that?

Anything can happen, but I think that the main issue is that the biggest one, Mercado Pago, has already asked for a banking license, we should guess that in any time in the future, they will get that banking license and they will be able to offer the product. We need to be ready, our products need to be competitive and have a good user experience in order to be in a good position to keep our share.

We've been growing on wallets, on payroll share. We have around 15% of total market.

We have been growing consistently through the past years, I think that we have a good offer for our customers.

Okay. Thank you very much.

You're welcome.

Thank you. Thank you all for attending the conference.

Just to highlight that despite the challenge of the environment we've been going through this year, we believe BBVA Argentina has proven resilience and effective management in the year. Credit growth and nonperforming loans levels below the system average and a very solid position in solvency and liquidity are the key issues of our strategy, and we are committed to keep growing in the following quarters and to maintain our efficiency and generate profitability for our shareholders.