Thank you, Adam, and welcome to our results call for the first half of 2026. I'm pleased to report that our outstanding results reflect the remarkable strength, resilience, and confidence in the UAE economy, which continues to create exceptional growth opportunities for businesses and individuals while reinforcing its position as one of the world's most dynamic growth markets.

With that, Emirates NBD reported record financial performance, with a half-one profit before tax of 16.2 billion. Customer confidence and business momentum remain robust, with business volumes across most of our products and services returning to pre-conflict levels.

During the first half of 2026, our impressive double-digit lending and deposit growth, driven by healthy growth momentum in the UAE and the consolidation of RBL, drove our balance sheet beyond 1.3 trillion dirhams. We are well positioned to deliver another strong year of performance while creating the momentum for future growth.

Liquidity remains one of Emirates NBD's greatest competitive strengths, underpinning our ability to capture growth opportunities while maintaining a strong funding profile. Further to our $2.25 billion long-term syndicate financing deal in Q1, in April, we successfully reopened the GCC debt capital markets with a $750 million AT1 capital issuance at highly competitive pricing, the first public debt capital markets transaction by a GCC issuer since the start of conflict.

The transaction was oversubscribed more than three times the issuance size from a diversified global investor base, enabling us to tighten pricing, demonstrating strong international investor confidence in Emirates NBD and the UAE. The UAE continues to attract capital and talent from around the world, reinforcing its position as a global destination of wealth.

Our leading wealth management platform and compelling product offering continue to position us as the trusted partner of choice for clients seeking to grow and preserve their wealth. This is evident from our 105 billion assets under management as we deliver double-digit growth in the UAE since April.

Through Emirates NBD's Islamic window and Emirates Islamic, the group has established one of the region's leading Islamic banking franchises, with combined Islamic assets surpassing 250 billion dirhams, as the UAE continues to strengthen its position as the world's leading center for Islamic finance and builds on the global leadership in Islamic capital markets. We also delighted to finally welcome RBL Bank to the Emirates NBD family, marking a defining milestone in our international growth story, expanding our presence into one of the world's fastest-growing markets, and creating opportunities to deliver long-term value for our customers and shareholders.

Our long-term strategy remains focused on expanding our presence in our identified core markets, and the successful integration of RBL clearly represents that focused approach. India is a strategically important market for Emirates NBD and the UAE, and RBL has already contributed 44 billion dirhams of loans, 43 billion of deposits to the group, representing about 6% of group assets.

Our relentless focus on innovation, AI, and digital leadership continues to unlock new avenues for growth. We are proud to be ranked the number one bank in the Evident AI Index for banks in the Middle East and Africa, independently recognizes NBD's lead for AI maturity and reinforcing our strength of our investment in talent, innovation, and technology.

We enter the second half with healthy growth momentum, robust financial strength, and absolute confidence in our ability to capture growth opportunities, deepen our customer relationships, and continue delivering outstanding value for our shareholders. I'll now hand you over to Patrick to go through the results in more detail.

Patrick.

Thanks, Shayne, and good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for joining.

We have delivered another strong quarter and a record first-half performance, reflecting the continued strength and resilience of the UAE economy and our diversified business model. We're also pleased with the milestone consolidation of RBL in the second quarter results.

Before I walk through the numbers, I'd like just to highlight that our 2026 guidance is excluding RBL. The appendix does set out a few pages on RBL, you can see the magnitude of the balance sheet and P&L and how much has been included for the last two weeks of June post-acquisition, alongside some pro forma H1 2026 and 2025 numbers for reference, albeit on a local GAAP basis.

Let me start with the overall H1 performance on slide 3. Record total income of 27.9 billion, up 16% year-on-year, reflecting strong growth across business segments and geographies.

Within that, net interest income rose 13% year-on-year to 19 billion, driven by continued robust asset growth momentum and resilient margins. Non-funded income grew by an impressive 25% year-on-year, driven by strong customer activity and diversified product offerings across all of our businesses.

Our cost-to-income ratio came in at 29.9%, comfortably below our long-standing guidance of below 33%, reflecting continued focus on investing to grow income while maintaining cost discipline. With that, we delivered a solid 17% increase in operating profit for the first half.

Despite the higher impairment charge and higher hyperinflation adjustment, profit before tax came in at a record 16.2 billion, up 5% year-on-year, demonstrating the strength of our underlying business. On a quarterly basis, against the current geopolitical backdrop, we're very pleased to have delivered a broadly stable quarterly profit at 6.4 billion.

Income was down quarter-on-quarter, mostly as a function of the seasonally super-strong Q1 FX and structured product client sales that we discussed in April, and I'll show again shortly. In the bottom table, you can see the balance sheet metrics are all in really great shape, with gross lending up 17%, total assets surpassed 1.3 trillion, further boosted by the consolidation of RBL for the first time.

Capital, liquidity, and credit quality metrics all remain extremely healthy. Let me turn to a bit more detail by component, starting with net interest margins on slide 4.

The overall margin at 3.25% in H1 is well within our full-year guidance of 3.1 to 3.3%. Within that, ENBD ex-Deniz NIMs remained resilient at 2.61% in H1, declining quarter-on-quarter following the follow quarter-on-quarter due to the flow-through impact of rate cuts in late 2025, together with a competitive pricing environment for deposits across the UAE banking sector.

We're still in a good position with respect to margins, especially given the quality of our market-leading deposit franchise in the UAE, and tracking well to our verbal guidance of 2.5 to 2.6% margin. DenizBank reported a net interest margin of 6.99% in H1.

As I indicated in the first quarter, we did see some pressure on margins in DenizBank, reflecting higher overnight borrowing rates and the read-across to retail deposit rates. The quarterly NIM for Deniz standalone dropped 25 basis points, but we continue to expect the full-year margin to be around the 7% mark.

Overall, we remain comfortable with our full-year guidance. Just moving to slide 5, the 25% H1 year-on-year growth in non-funded income was the key driver for overall income growth, as our continued focus on investing in client-led fee-generating businesses and products continues to pay off.

The bottom-left chart highlights the continued strength and consistency of our fee and commission income, driven by our continued robust asset growth and strong performance from businesses like wealth management and credit cards, which have been a key strategic focus for us over the last couple of years. Even trade finance and investment banking is up year-on-year, albeit we did observe a quarter-on-quarter drop for Q2, as these two businesses have seen lower volumes.

Total other non-funded income increased 28% year-on-year, and we've split that out by quarter in the bottom-right chart. We've seen strong client flow income, particularly in FX and structured product sales.

As I indicated at Q1, the Q2 income has moderated somewhat after a blistering start for January and February, which was more seasonal rather than conflict-related. Actually, the Q2 client flows were a bit above the average for the prior four quarters.

Turning to slide 6, gross lending is up 17%, of which 6% is from the first-time consolidation of RBL. Peeling that back a bit, the same-store gross lending is up 11%.

We had a strong start in Q1, up 7% 7%, then 4% in Q2, we're tracking nicely to our full-year guidance of mid-teens. Retail is up 9%, adding 38 billion of new originations, with growth coming across our diversified product suite as we continue to leverage our digital capabilities to enhance origination efficiency and customer experience journeys.

Corporate is up 12%, with an excellent 60 billion of new lending in the first half of 2026. We continue to see healthy demand across most sectors in our core markets, particularly in the UAE.

On the liability side, deposits increased by a further 106 billion during the first half, including 43 billion from RBL. Excluding RBL, deposits rose 63 billion in the first half, of which 19 billion was in Q2 alone.

I think that shows, as a leading UAE bank, we continue to attract new funds, albeit more is coming in through time deposits. Part of that is corporate clients seeking higher yields when deploying their strong cash buffers.

That has, in turn, diluted our CASA ratio to 57% and implicitly adds to our overall cost of funding, which is already factored into our margin guidance. On slide 7, we see the NPL ratio improved to 2.1% in the first half, well within our guidance of circa 2.5%.

Overall coverage is strong at 152%, with stage 3 coverage of 82%. In H1, we have a 1.4 billion impairment charge, which equates to a 42 basis point cost of risk, trending close to the middle of our full-year guidance range of 30 to 50 basis points.

As I said we would on the Q1 call, we have now updated our new macroeconomic variables in our expected credit loss models and remain comfortable with the 865 million overlay we've taken in Q1. ENBD ex-Deniz cost of risk came in at a 8 basis point credit, benefiting from good cash recovery flows and overall credit quality of the book remaining robust.

DenizBank has had a 321 basis point impairment charge in the first half, which remained at elevated levels as the effect of higher-for-longer interest rates continues to create a flow-through impact on retail, SME, and agri books in Turkey. On slide 8, the cost-to-income ratio is at 29.9% for H1, comfortably within the long-term guidance of less than 33%.

Our continued investments in digital capabilities, GenAI, product innovation, and the expansion of our net international network is translating into stronger customer activity, broader product penetration, and sustainable income growth. We remain focused on investing where we see clear opportunities to enhance long-term returns and improve operational operating efficiency.

We are tracking to around 31% cost-income for the full year, and with RBL, that may be around the 32% mark. Moving to slide 9, the group maintains very strong liquidity, with an AD ratio of 84% and an LCR of 135%.

The LCR did decrease in Q2, mostly from the funding of the $2.75 billion RBL acquisition, $2.75 billion. ENBD issued 30 billion of term debt and sukuk in H1 2026.

As Shayne's mentioned already, we successfully closed a $2.25 billion long-term syndicated financing at the end of March and then called and replaced our AT1 note of $750 million in April. These marquee deals highlight our strong credit profile and market appetite for our debt and capital instruments.

Speaking of capital, slide 10 shows our healthy capital position, with a CET1 ratio of 13.6%. This is after the RBL acquisition impact, which came in at 77 basis points, a bit better than the lower end of the soft guidance of 80 to 100 basis points we had given to the market earlier.

A strong capital base is a pillar of strength that allows us to continue healthy growth and support our customers in the current environment. In Q2, we also had all three rating agencies conduct their annual review, post which they maintained our credit ratings with a stable outlook.

Their reports highlighted the strength of our liquidity position, market-leading credit coverage and capital ratios, and the underlying strength of our business model. Slide 11 contains divisional highlights.

Just to mention a few of these, Retail delivered another record performance, reporting the highest-ever operating profit of 7.5 billion in H1, and as I mentioned earlier, strong loan growth of 9% with 38 billion of new originations and an impressive CASA ratio of 74%. C&IB continued its outstanding performance, delivering another set of excellent results, with profit before tax up 16% year-on-year, continued growth momentum in lending of 12% with strong new originations of 60 billion, and a strong deposit growth of 12% year-to-date.

Global Markets and Treasury delivered very strong results, generating 1.4 billion of income for the first half. The team led the reopening of the regional debt capital markets with our $750 million AT1 issuance, affirming our ability to attract global investors at competitive pricing.

Finally, DenizBank delivered 3.0 billion profit before tax and hyperinflation during the first half, up 2%, despite elevated impairment. With that, we can now open the call for questions.

Thank you. Hi, Shayne, Patrick.

It's Naresh Bilandani from Jefferies. Just three questions, please, on asset quality and NIM.

The first one on impairment, can I kindly check the extent to which, if at all, you saw the benefits of reversals in the UAE corporate bank? Naresh,

Naresh, you're breaking up really badly.

Yes. Yes.

Is that any better now?

No.

No.

Hello?

Sure, we'll do that. All right, thank you.

Hi. Thank you, and well done on the Hello?

Sorry, we've lost you.

am I audible?

You are.

Yes. We can hear you, Rahul.

Thanks. Good to see you.

Two questions from my side, Patrick, Shayne. The first one is on margins, the second one is on RBL.

On margins, what we've seen is the bank has basically seen very good loan growth, but margins have come down. Is this a kind of an intentional strategy of the bank to gain market share even if it is coming at the cost of some margin compression?

Is that a stated sort of strategy? Linked to the margin question, we've seen some banks in the market over the last few months roll out some very lucrative time deposit sort of products, 6, 6.5% products.

Are you seeing kind of some liquidity squeeze, maybe not at Emirates NBD's sort of end, but maybe some smaller banks who are facing squeeze, and they are kind of trying to get these CASA deposits or time deposits into their fold? Are you seeing anything like that?

That is also impacting, as you might mentioned earlier, I think, competition impacting your cost of funding. That's my question on the margins basically.

The second question on RBL, just wanted to clarify based on IFRS like-for-like basis, what is RBL's as of end of 2Q NPL ratio and NPL coverage? Are you comfortable with those levels of coverage?

I.e., I recall when you acquired DenizBank, you kind of provisioned over next several quarters to get DenizBank's coverage at par with what you wanted it to be. Is that something that you are planning to do with RBL as well?

That's the first part of the question. Second part of the question around synergies, we haven't heard much in terms of KPIs on synergies that you expect from RBL.

Any specific numbers that you could provide would be useful. Thank you.

Maybe I'll start off with those, and Shayne, you might want to add a few points here and there. Just look, Rahul, just on the NIM side and growth strategy, nothing has changed.

We've had a very strong pipeline. We had super-strong growth Q4 last year.

You saw Q1 was up 7%. We've stuck with our guidance, albeit guidance when I said mid-teens, let's call that 15/16% or so.

I think that may have been taken as sort of the lower end of what the market consensus was expecting. I think the market was expecting somewhere in the 20s.

Then, obviously, at Q1 with the reset,

Reset of growth numbers.

The reset of where we actually stayed with that guidance, and maybe that's taken as probably the top end of that guidance. Nothing's really changed from that.

When it comes to loan pricing, we are very disciplined about that, we're not reducing loan pricing to try and compete and take market share. It's on the funding side across the market since March.

It has been competitive for funding. Happily, we're in a very strong position with our CASA, and we're seeing more corporates taking the opportunity with their treasuries to convert from CASA and get more yield on the term side of things.

Anything you wanted to add to that, Shayne?

I think on the pricing, Rahul, you've obviously been getting some texts or WhatsApps about deposit pricing. What I'd warn you is, make sure you read the fine print because they normally have lots of caveats on those yields, and they're not as attractive as they seem prima facie.

I think there's no doubt that pricing in deposits has gone up. Now, we've still managed to grow, and actually, we've lost some large deposits because we've been unwilling to pay up what some of the market has been prepared to pay because we don't need to.

We're not being irrational when it comes to pricing on our deposits. We are lending into the interbank market every day, which shows you that some of the small medium banks have got liquidity tightness, and we can lend to the market with quite decent spreads at that time because we've got all the liquidity there.

I think are we seeing pressure on pricing on deposits? I think the answer is absolutely yes.

It's there. If you look at the central bank statistics on liquidity since the conflict started, there's still, prima facie, ample liquidity in the market, but it appears to me anyway, I'll have to dig out the numbers, but it appears to me it's concentrated on a few banks.

Therefore, others that aren't as lucky as us to have such a robust funding base need to either attract or borrow to actually increase their liquidity.

Shayne, I'd just add to that that it's important to note we haven't changed our margin guidance. Yes, there are fewer rate cuts than we were expecting, and that is offsetting the expected increase in that cost of funding that will have some effect.

We've kept the actual guidance range. Then on RBL, IFRS, etc.?

We haven't gone back and converted their accounts from prior to acquisition to IFRS in that sense. As we go through the next quarters, you'll get a much better sense of what those metrics look like for the group.

They reported their results at the end of last week. That was just over 90 million dirhams equivalent of profit, and that is before the benefit that they will have of the $2.7 billion of investment, there's further yield on that.

I'm not going to tell you what that is. We have to also remember that they remain a listed company, and so we will be then aligning to a guidance and some of those metrics as well.

You can actually see all of their

I think that's important for the analysts to note. We're not going to be able to give you a lot of forward guidance as we could, for example, on DenizBank, as much on RBL because they're a listed entity, and they have their own regulator and rules to follow.

I know we don't want to be cagey about it, but on the same token, we need to be very mindful of the regulatory rules in India. Yeah.

Rahul, I'd just add that also, they're not on IFRS 9 in India. That's coming in April next year.

We have made all the appropriate adjustments in the day-one acquisition accounting. As I think you mentioned DenizBank, and it's a similar situation there where you actually have to book all your assets at fair value, you're recording your stage 3 assets net of the impairment rather than gross.

They actually do publish some of the coverage numbers, they are available there as well, and then will assess as we go through the next quarter if that's about the right level. By the way, the POCI is a very small adjustment in these accounts, even after all of that, it's about a hundred just over 100 million dirhams.

Nowhere of the magnitude from DenizBank.

The first syllable ended up at about 1.1, right?

Just on 1.1, yes.

Yeah.

There's a note in the accounts that sets out the acquisition accounting for you. You also mentioned synergies.

This acquisition is not about cost synergies going into it trying to make savings from that point of view. It's very much a strategic focus on growing revenue, taking advantage of the cross-border on the corporate side, building out the wealth capabilities on the retail side.

There'll be more of that in time to come, but it's not a critical part of these results.

The merger of our existing operations with RBL would hardly change the dial. It's only three branches, it's not a big synergy from that merger of those three branches into RBL.

I think technology we're probably looking 12 months to 24 months out before we can get our tech stack into them, even though they've got a lot of the same core systems as us, which is very unusual. They've got Calypso, they've got Finacle, they've got Oracle.

There's a different version. For example, Finacle, there's an Indian version of Finacle and an international version of international.

They're very similar, but not identical. There's a roadmap that we need to build to actually start putting in our app, etc., into that market.

Obviously, it's also got to be tailored for the Indian regulatory requirements and also it's got to work in India and what the customers demand there.

Should we see if we've got Naresh or John back?

Yes, hi. Can you hear me now?

No,

still not,

Naresh. Just I think we will

Yes, please

do that. Thank you.

Put it in writing, and Karan will bring it up.

What about John from UBS?

Hi, let's try again. Can you hear me now?

Yes,

John. Go ahead.

Great. Sorry about that earlier.

First question then would please be on the outlook for the cost of risk in the second half. Do you think it can continue to trend at these kind of levels, or will the recoveries sort of normalize and it'll start to trend higher?

It sounds like there's no sort of delayed provisioning that you need to take on the RBL book that might see any upward pressure. The second question is just around how should we think about the capital and the dividend and your comfort levels there?

Do you want to build it up a little further? I appreciate you'll update us at the end of the year, but do you see room to grow the dividends this year?

Thank you.

John, look, I'll just catch that first one first. Just on the outlook for the H2 of cost of risk, we're currently at that 42 basis points right in the middle of guidance.

At Q1, we were at the 50 basis points at the top end. Net-net, the overall charge we have is entirely from DenizBank, where we've seen that elevated charge coming through in Q1 and Q2.

A lot of that's coming from 2024 vintages. We're hoping to see that recede somewhat in the second half and have a reduced overall cost of risk so that they land somewhere between 250 and 300 basis points rather than over 300 basis points.

Some relief on the overall there. Then for the UAE and the rest of the bank, we took that 865 million provision in the first quarter.

We haven't seen a significant change come through when we updated the MEVs. We're not seeing anything, and it does take time for facilities to flow through to stage 3 if they are going to flow through.

On the retail side, we're actually seeing the delinquency rates have held pretty well in the last couple of months. There's been no sharp elevations of those.

We'll keep an eye on that. On the corporate side, and when it comes to deferrals, we're seeing really quite few deferral requests coming relative to the overall size of the book and relative to what we saw back in 2020 during COVID.

Look, we'll keep an eye on it for the rest of the year, but for the time being, we don't see a need to change our cost of risk, albeit it's more likely to be at the top of that range. Maybe on the second one, Shayne, any thoughts on dividends and capital?

We're always pretty conservative on dividends, but as I always say to you analysts, that's not my decision. That's the board decision as to what we're going to announce.

We've always maintained pretty robust buffers in our CET1 ratio, as you all know. We have for years and years and years.

I think we've been over 14% for about six, seven years now. We are a company that I think has demonstrated by not paying out high dividends, we've been able to expand internationally in our core markets and deliver substantial shareholder value through capital appreciation.

I think we've demonstrated that we've used the capital well and given the returns to the shareholders not in cash, but in implied stock value. I think, yeah, we've done a pretty good job there.

We don't have a minimum capital tier that we announce to the public. Obviously, we would never breach the regulatory.

Obviously, we also want to always have a buffer above that regulatory floor.

Got it. Thank you.

Sorry, John. I wasn't very forthcoming.

It's quite all right. Thank you.

We're very happy with the returns on equity. It's over 18%.

Should

Are we going to get Naresh a go, or not? Okay.

He's doing it in writing. He's typing.

Okay.

Hi, thank you very much. Congratulations on the results.

Congratulations on the consolidation of RBL. Couple of questions from my side.

If you can give us some color on the potential exit NIM for this year, how do you see that? I think you've given a guidance, but directionally how you see NIM kind of playing out for the rest of this year?

I think that could be very helpful. Secondly, when I look at your international exposure and if I just look at RBL and DenizBank, it now makes up about 20% of your assets.

When you think about your next 3 to 5 years, where do you see this level rising to? Is this the kind of level you think is going to be sustainable longer-term, or there is scope for this to go increase further?

If you any color on that would be pretty useful. Maybe just a point on corporate tax with the India consolidation.

Where do you see your effective tax rate for the group? Thank you.

Maybe I'll just work through those backwards, Shabbir. Look, I don't think the effective tax rate will be really significantly changed, just given the size of RBL and the current level of earnings.

We'll see what that looks like in the next quarter. DenizBank has the highest corporate tax rate at 30%, and they're the ones that typically have more frequent changes in tax rules, so that they sort of more materially affect the tax rate.

On international targets, overall we've got about what 30, 31%, including DenizBank, of assets internationally. We don't set a specific target.

We'd like to grow that as much as possible. It just happens that we're also growing very rapidly in the UAE, and adding on India is obviously going to mean we're going to have some more growth internationally as well.

Shayne, did you have any thoughts on that one before I go to

To be honest, I thought that the offshore would be a bigger percentage than it is by now, but the reality behind that is not that the offshore hasn't grown well. That it really has.

It's just that the UAE has been growing at a massively fast clip. As much as we've had good growth from the offshore markets, it's really that the UAE's been offsetting that percentage growth.

In dollar dirham terms, it's good growth. It's just a matter of that the UAE's loan demand has been so strong, and it continues to be.

Sitting in the management credit committees the last couple, the volume of deals is still very robust, very robust. Surprisingly robust, if I must say.

That's why we're exuding confidence because we can see what's coming at us.

Shabbir, just on your first question on NIMs. Just the exit rate.

For the group as a whole, you can see we're at 3.16, but obviously, that's significantly dependent on the Deniz margin. They are at just on 7% now.

We're still expecting that around for the full year. There are a couple of rate cuts that we would expect through the rest of the year, currently at 37%.

I think out in the market, there's an expectation maybe another 200 basis points cut, not huge, but that will support the margin there a bit. Then if I just take ex-Deniz, we have that guidance continuing at 2.5 to 2.6.

The second quarter was 2.53. That should now have the effect of last year's rate cuts come through.

It's also got the impact of the change in mix in time deposits. By the way, we haven't been paying up for time deposits.

It's just that there is a bigger percentage of our funding is from time deposits. We're still good with the 2.5 to 2.6, albeit I expect it to be very much at the lower end of that range by the year-end.

So

2.53 is where you think it can sustain for the UAE for the ENBD ex Deniz?

Yes, well, it's going to lose some of that, just mainly from the big variable there is the change in the funding mix profile. We just saw particularly strong levels of time deposits in Q2.

If we stay around that same mix level, then we should be able to maintain that margin at that level. Obviously, we have to maintain discipline on the asset pricing side of things as well.

Obviously, the market, there may be some changes in the market if liquidity tightens further. You saw EIBOR near the end of June actually stepped up.

I think it was over 10 basis points. If you get more steps-up like that, there is potential for change in that margin, but I'm not going to guess what that is now.

Fair enough. Maybe if I can ask just one more question.

On your growth year-to-date, you've been about 11% without RBL, and you're talking about mid-teens. Considering what Shayne has said, it looks like that looks a bit conservative.

Is that still you're comfortable with that mid-teens kind of guidance?

No. I like the consistency that we actually it was you may remember back in January that it was the first time I went above high single digit for loan growth.

As I said earlier, that even when I said mid-teens, that was taken by the market to be much higher than that. Something around that level.

I think there's a bit of a band in there. We're seeing 4% growth in the second quarter.

There is a good pipeline. It does depend on companies and their CFOs drawing down on the facilities.

The timing of that may be a variable as well. We'll just have to see how that pans out for the rest of the year.

There's only two areas that we've seen some downturn in our volumes. Everything's back to normal in retail, for example.

There's only two main areas we've seen a downturn. One is trade finance, which you'd probably expect given the conflict, and two is car loans.

Again, I think you'd expect that because getting car supplies is quite difficult. I think they're the only two areas that I think it's being negatively impacted in volumes.

Even wealth, as I said in my opening, it has grown really well. Some of the stuff you hear about, oh, wealth is leaving the UAE and going to Switzerland and Singapore, well, that's not our experience.

It continues to grow for us. I don't know what the others are doing, but we seem to be doing pretty well with it.

There's growth right across our portfolio. Obviously, the other thing that is on the back burner at the moment is IPOs.

Investment banks going gangbusters with whether it be sukuks, AT1s, etc., they're leading most league tables across the Middle East area.

Thank you for hosting this presentation and for taking my questions. I have several remaining.

One is on domestic net interest margin. Are there any measures which you can take to protect domestic net interest margin, or would you rather prefer to see this combination of solid loan growth and a moderate ongoing margin erosion going forward?

My second question is on cost of risk. Do you think India could be a risk for your provisioning even if not imminently, but in the next let's say 12, 18 months?

Wouldn't you be rather add provisions sooner than later given the exposure to MSMEs and cards? Third, if you could help us to summarize your outlook or your picture on minimum capital requirements.

When does the central bank bring back the reduced or postponed buffers? Do you think the risk of higher D-SIB buffer the risk is higher given that you are a bigger bank and a more complex bank?

How shall we think about this real minimum, not the reported minimum? Thank you.

Thanks, Olga. Thanks for joining.

Just on the domestic NIM, I think we've got a long track record of being disciplined on the asset pricing. We've never gone for volume growth by pricing down and giving away the credit spread, because it's well understood if you're in a falling rate environment and you've got the base rate and the credit spread falling, you're going to have a margin jam later.

Yeah. Olga, every deal we look at in corporate, for example, we have a return on risk capital calculation for it.

We're very mindful of making sure we get the right return on capital. Now, that return may not be pure lending spread.

It could be ancillary business that we're picking up from the client, for example, cash management, trade, derivatives, etc. We look at the overall customer pricing and what is the return on risk capital.

Also the shape of the overall portfolio, Olga, affects that. If you're in the middle of the PD curve, you can price for the credit spread and get the ancillary business.

Obviously, if it's more government-related, even though you might get a good return on risk-weighted assets, the margins can be compressed because the spreads will be lower. The good news for us is that over 2/3 of the origination growth we've seen in this half has come from the private sector.

We're not government or GRE dependent, so that's positive from a margin's point of view. We do have those opportunities for growth that we were talking about earlier.

The other variable there is then the funding mix that we were discussing just a moment ago, and that I would say is probably the main variable for protecting the margins. You've got the asset growth opportunity.

It has to be funded. Market liquidity is tighter.

We're not going to use that as an excuse for not growing the asset side of things. Just on the cost of risk, particularly for India and RBL, I think the cost of risk on a local basis in their results that they published last week was about 50 to 55 basis points.

From where we are today, that's relatively neutral. I think we discussed a bit earlier about, once we've done the consolidation, we've already taken the books on at fair value, both on the non-performing loan side, then also on the stage 1 and 2 equivalent.

We've made adjustments for that. Any future lending then does have to be on a group modeled basis.

The coverage level that they have, they do put that in their accounts, albeit on a local GAAP basis. I'm not expecting that we would have to do a whole lot to beef up their stage 3 equivalent.

At the moment, they don't themselves have stage 3 as such, we'll have to look at that over the next six months and remembering they apply IFRS 9 from April next year. Obviously, when we consolidate, we have to convert that into an IFRS basis.

Just on the minimum capital levels, the central bank did update the FIRP. A couple of changes in there was mainly around liquidity, a bit of an extension of the timing.

Specifically for capital, there is still the 1% relief on the conservation buffer. While the countercyclical buffer was released, it came in on the 1st of January and then was released in March or early April.

We still do have the UK and now a new KSA countercyclical buffer. The theoretical minimum capital is 10.16 for us.

We still operate at the 11.16. In our minds, we're not needing to avail ourselves of the conservation buffer relief that is permitted.

At 13.6, you can see that we don't need to. We've remained above the fray when it comes to capital adequacy, as you know well that we have for many years.

I would hope that they won't increase the capital requirements of banks. Already we're, on an international comparison, at a very high level from a regulatory perspective.

Thank you very much, thank you.

Thanks, Olga.

Thanks, Olga.

Yes, thank you for the conference call and thank you for all the answers so far. I wanted to just ask a few clarifications on asset quality.

Can you please explain whether the loan stage mix reflects the regional conflicts in February, right? That's the first question.

Secondly, I'm looking at your NPL ratio guidance, which is 2.5% for 2026. Obviously, your NPL ratio so far improved, right?

What are you factoring in in terms of the slippage in asset quality towards the year-end? That's the second part.

Thirdly, when I look at your financial statements, right, in your footnotes, you say that you continue to monitor your loan portfolios and whether the financial difficulties are temporary and liquidity-driven, or it's from the extraordinary circumstances that started at the end of February, right? Just wanted to clarify are we in for some potential kind of review of asset quality towards the end of the year?

How likely is that, right? I think relating to that, I also noted that the scenario weightings within your ECL models, they're back to 40% probability for the baseline, 30% for downside upside scenarios, right?

That's a big difference, big improvement from the first quarter when you factored in I think 100% downside weighting for retail, 80% for corporate. Can you explain which specific macro variables improved enough to justify this normalization?

Thanks, Aybek. I'll take those in order.

Just on the stage mix, I think you've been looking at note 23 of the accounts. What struck me as very positive is that the first half this year, the profile of the downgrades from stage 1 to stage 2 and stage 2 to stage 3 is very similar to H1 last year.

When it comes to the actual migration from stage to stage, there has been nothing that's stopping us or holding us back from applying those downgrades for a significant change in the credit risk based on IFRS 9. Yes, there have been some deferrals.

When they are for good credits, that doesn't mean you automatically downgrade to stage 2 for that forbearance. Where there are credit issues, yes indeed, we've been downgrading.

Even so, after that, we just haven't seen any outsized changes between the stages related to the conflict. I did refer to in an earlier question just what we're seeing in delinquency rates in retail.

Yes, there'll be a few hotspots here and there, but the good news is the very substantial 865 million overlay we took in Q1 put us in very good shape going into the second quarter. Just on the NPLs, the 2.5%, okay, we started out at circa, could have said less or around.

2.1's good news. Obviously, as we grow the portfolio, that means the denominator in that calculation goes up.

We did see an increase in the NPL base during the quarter, but it's more coming down from a function of the growing portfolio. The good news there is that, therefore, the flows ultimately of NPLs relative to the rest of the portfolio is coming down.

Without RBL, that ratio would have been 2.2% versus 2.1. Are we seeing slippage?

I don't think that language was designed to be as sort of a caveat or a statement that we're positively expecting further slippage. We just don't know at this stage.

If I knew already, I would have had to have downgraded it. It's just a statement that things can and do downgrade, but it's not with any foresight or knowledge of what will downgrade.

Just on the footnotes and your reference to the macroeconomic variables going back to 30 4 upside, 40 for base, 30 for downside, look, we are doing exactly what we said we would at Q1. Stage 1, just put all of the models down to the worst-case scenario, take a big overlay, update all the model data in Q2, and then see what comes out of that, and revert back to the usual mix.

It's what we did exactly through the first half in 2020, and I think we got it just about right then, and I think we're getting it just about right now. You asked about some of the specific MEVs.

Actually, what we found was many of them were not in bad shape, remembering it's not all about the current year, it's about the forward-looking projections as well. I think if there was one MEV that affected the corporate side more than anything, it was actually around hotels and room rates and how some of that feeds into the models, and therefore what that does for corporate earnings, etc.

I don't think that would come as much of a surprise. Also what it showed is the domestic economy outside of tourism is much deeper and more resilient than it might have been 5 years ago.

I think that's quite a positive thing we took from that.

If we look at our credit and debit card spend, onboarding of new clients is actually growing quite well, I think we're in a pretty good spot there.

Yeah.

I think just to highlight looking forward, I'd say one thing that is our strength is our stage 3 coverage. The good thing about our stage 3 coverage is, we're not sorting out historical problems.

In most of our stage 3s, any recovery is a right back. That's an inherent strength from our conservatism.

We're not dealing with the past, we're only dealing what's just coming at us. I think we're in a very strong position to weather any storm that comes at us.

At the moment, we don't see the storm. At the moment, it's blue skies.

If the storm comes, we've got the resilience to take it. We've cured our past.

Thank you, Adam. I think I've checked the questions.

Patrick and Shayne, you've pretty much answered all of them. We've even got the Naresh's question, it was around the same staging.

Good.

We've covered that also. Shayne, over to you for the closing remarks.

I'd like to thank you all for participating in today's call. Looking ahead, we are highly confident in the UAE's leadership, the enduring strength of our economy, and our ability at Emirates NBD to navigate uncertainty, to catch growth opportunities, and continue delivering value for our customers and shareholders.

I'll now hand you back to Adam to provide details in case you have any follow-up questions and close the call. Adam.