Operator
Hello, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to Ashland's first quarter 2026 earnings conference call and webcast.
At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session.
To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star 1 1 on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised.
To withdraw your question, please press star 1 1 again. I would now like to hand the conference over to Sandy Klugman, Director of Investor Relations.
You may begin.
Sandy Klugman
Thank you. Hello, everyone.
Welcome to Ashland's first quarter fiscal year 2026 earnings conference call and webcast. My name is Sandy Klugman, and I am Ashland's Director of Investor Relations.
Joining me on the call today are Guillermo Novo, Chair and CEO; William Whitaker, CFO; as well as our business unit leaders: Alessandra Faccin, Life Sciences and Intermediates; Jim Minicucci, Personal Care; and Dago Caceres, Specialty Additives. Please note that we will be referencing slides during today's call.
We encourage you to follow along with the webcast materials available at ashland.com under Investor Relations. As a reminder, today's presentation contains forward-looking statements regarding our fiscal 2026 outlook and other matters as detailed on slide 2 and in our Form 10-Q.
These statements are subject to risk and uncertainties that could cause future results to differ materially from today's projections. We believe any such statements are based on reasonable assumptions, but there is no assurance these expectations will be achieved.
We will also reference certain adjusted financial metrics, both actual and projected, which are non-GAAP measures. We present these adjusted figures to provide additional insight into our ongoing business performance.
GAAP reconciliations are available on our website and in the appendix of these slides. I'll now hand the call over to Guillermo for his opening remarks.
Guillermo Novo
Thanks, Sandy, and welcome to everyone joining us. For today, I'm happy to join this call from Shanghai, China.
I begin with our first quarter highlights and how we were advancing our strategic priorities. Later in the call, I'll return to share some of the latest innovation developments, where we continue to see tremendous momentum and opportunities for differentiation.
William will review our financial results, operational execution, and outlook. Our business unit leaders will provide additional insight into performance across their segments and markets.
Please turn to slide 5. Let's begin with a review of the key business drivers for the first quarter.
We delivered solid results while navigating ongoing demand softness in coatings and construction, supported by strong execution and disciplined cost actions. Life Sciences delivered healthy growth, supported by resilient pharma demand and momentum across our Innovate and Globalize pillars.
Injectables, tablet coatings, and high-value cellulosic excipients all contributed to year-over-year growth. Innovation continued to strengthen performance, with contribution from low-nitrite cellulosics, high-purity excipients, and several new product introductions.
Personal Care delivered stable performance, with underlying demand broadly steady. Biofunctional actives grew double digits, and microbial protection continued to gain share as our globalized initiatives supported high-value applications.
Softer volumes in core hair and skin care primarily reflected unplanned and isolated customer plant outages. Specialty Additives continued to face muted demand, with coatings and construction driving most of the year-over-year decline.
Coatings weakness was most pronounced in China and select export markets, while construction softness reflected broader market conditions. Despite lower volumes, cost actions and HEC network benefits drove meaningful margin expansion.
Intermediates market conditions were modestly softer, reflecting trough-like dynamics across BDO and its derivatives, which pressured captive BDO transfer pricing. The merchant business was stable, with steady volume and modest pricing pressure resulting in flat sales.
Operationally, the team continued to manage through the equipment replacement in Calvert City while delivering solid free cash flow. Although this issue impacted costs and pressured margins across the VP&D chain, customer supply remained uninterrupted.
The impact we expected to be contained within the first quarter will now extend into the second quarter, as commissioning of the new unit revealed additional equipment issues that are delaying the startup. We anticipate completing the necessary fixes and bringing the unit online later in the quarter.
Although outside Q1, recent weather-related events also have impacted our operations in the Mid-Atlantic. Customer supply remained uninterrupted, but we expect incremental costs, which William will address later in the call as part of our outlook for the year.
While we saw month-to-month variability, we're excited the quarter—we exited the quarter on a stronger footing, with December improving versus November and that momentum continuing in January. Taken together, these results reflect steady execution and continued progress across our strategic priorities.
Now I'll turn the call over to William to walk through the first quarter financial performance in more detail. William?
William Whitaker
Thank you, Guillermo. Please turn to slide 6.
Our first quarter performance reflects increasing consistency of our operating model. Across the portfolio, the team executed well, advanced our initiatives, and managed through operational impacts while maintaining solid cost discipline.
The portfolio and manufacturing optimization actions we took last year are supporting margins through improved mix, lower costs, and a more efficient footprint. Avoca was included in our Q1 results last year, but as we move into Q2, we've fully lapped our portfolio actions, providing us with a clear performance baseline going forward.
We've also strengthened our working capital performance and delivered strong operating cash flow, a focus area for the team. All together, the quarter reflects a strengthening foundation with early signs of improving momentum, indicating that a growth inflection is building as fiscal 2026 unfolds.
Please turn to slide 7. First, the consistency of our consumer-facing businesses, now roughly 85% of our portfolio, continues to provide meaningful stability and resilience.
Second, our innovation and globalize initiatives are gaining strong traction, with sustained momentum in our highest-value applications. Third, last year's structural actions are fully embedded, improving margin durability and positioning us for stronger leverage as demand recovers.
Finally, even in segments experiencing more challenging conditions, our teams remain disciplined and focused on core fundamentals, ensuring we stay well positioned as industry conditions evolve. Overall, the quarter reflects resilient performance as our streamlined portfolio, strengthened cost structure, and disciplined execution continue to support our long-term strategy.
With innovation accelerating, globalize expanding, and productivity initiatives progressing, we are well positioned to build momentum throughout the year. Now on to the financial details.
Please turn to slide 9. Sales for the quarter were $386 million, down 5% versus last year.
The previously announced Avoca divestiture accounted for roughly $10 million, or about 2% of the decline. Excluding this portfolio action, sales were down 3%, reflecting a mixed demand environment.
Life Sciences continued to grow, supported by steady demand and ongoing innovation momentum. Personal Care remained stable overall, and would have grown low single digits excluding the unplanned customer outages.
Specialty Additives softened, reflecting broader demand conditions and ongoing competitive intensity. Pricing declined 2%, generally across segments, primarily reflecting carryover adjustments from the prior year.
FX contributed a favorable $9 million, or 2%, to sales versus prior year. Moving on to profitability.
Adjusted EBITDA was $58 million, down 5% year-over-year, including a $1 million impact from the Avoca divestiture. Excluding that action, adjusted EBITDA declined 3%, reflecting lower volumes and modest pricing pressure, partially offset by favorable mix, lower SARD, and FX benefits.
Importantly, the quarter included the anticipated $10 million adjusted EBITDA impact from the Calvert City outage. As Guillermo noted, we had expected the full effect to be recognized in the first quarter, but some impact will now carry into the second quarter, which we'll address in our guidance.
Raw material costs remain generally stable to favorable, and we continue to benefit from our cost actions across the portfolio. Adjusted EBITDA margins held steady at 15%, with over 250 basis points of compression stemming from the Calvert City outage.
Adjusted operating income grew 27% versus prior year, reflecting the stability of the underlying business as well as reduced depreciation and amortization from our optimization actions. Adjusted EPS, excluding intangible amortization, was 26 cents, down 7% from the prior year, reflecting lower income.
We delivered a strong quarter of cash generation, with $125 million of cash provided by operating activities and $26 million of ongoing free cash flow, which excludes the previously disclosed tax refund. Lower working capital and CapEx drove healthy free cash flow conversion of nearly 50% in our seasonally lower quarter.
We ended the quarter with total liquidity of approximately $900 million, a strong position as we move into the balance of the fiscal year. Net debt was $1.1 billion, and our net leverage remained solid at 2.7 times, providing flexibility to invest in strategic priorities while maintaining disciplined capital allocation.
Now, let's turn it to our business unit leaders for a closer look at segment performance. Alessandra, over to you.
Alessandra Faccin
Thank you, William. Good morning, everyone.
Please turn to slide 10 for Life Sciences. Life Sciences sales were $139 million, up 4% from the prior year, driven by resilient pharma demand and continued strength across our Innovate and Globalize pillars.
Pharma delivered low single-digit year-over-year growth, making its third consecutive quarter of volume gains. Demand remained strong for our high-value cellulosic excipients, supported by broad customer engagement across regions.
Injectables delivered another quarter of strong above-market growth, with continued pipeline expansion and accelerating uptake of recently launched products, reinforcing our confidence in sustainable growth within this high-margin segment. Tablet coatings delivered double-digit year-over-year growth across all regions, with particularly strong momentum in Asia-Pacific.
In nutrition, recent wins and ongoing commercial activity continue to support improving traction as we move through fiscal 2026. Pricing was slightly lower year-over-year, in line with expectations and largely reflecting carryover impacts from prior year adjustments, but remained stable sequentially.
Foreign exchange provided a $3 million benefit to sales. Turning to innovation, we continue to advance Ashland's leadership in pharmaceutical ingredients.
We saw meaningful contributions from our low-nitrite offerings, including the recently launched Plasdone low nitrite and Benecel low-nitrite grades. In injectables, we launched our new high-purity Viatel sucrose stabilizer for biologics in October.
Early customer engagement has been encouraging, with positive technical feedback and a growing commercial pipeline. In addition, multiple new injectable launches are planned for fiscal 2026, each supported by strong prelaunch customer engagement and rising market pull.
These advancements reinforce our commitment to delivering high-quality solutions that meet evolving customer needs. Turning to profitability, adjusted EBITDA was $31 million, up 11% year-over-year.
Margins expanded to 22.3%, a 140 basis points improvement including a $4 million impact from the Calvert City outage during the quarter. The year-over-year increase was driven by favorable mix, resilient pharma demand, and lower SARD as restructuring benefits continue to flow through, partially offset by modest pricing pressure.
Foreign exchange provided an additional $2 million benefit to EBITDA. Life Sciences continues to demonstrate strong operational discipline, resilient end-market demand, and consistent progress across both our Innovate and Globalize agendas.
Please turn to slide 11 for Intermediates. Intermediates performance remained challenged, consistent with what we expected entering the fiscal year.
Sales were $31 million, down 6% versus last year. Merchant sales were $22 million, with steady volumes and modest pricing pressure resulting in flat year-over-year performance.
Captive BDO sales declined to $9 million, driven by both lower volumes and lower transfer prices. Foreign exchange had a negligible impact on sales.
Turning to profitability, adjusted EBITDA was $1 million, down from $6 million in the prior year, with margins declining to 3.2% from 18.2%. Margins compressed due to lower pricing, reduced operating leverage, and roughly $2 million of early-quarter upstream production impacts from the Calvert City outage.
The team remains focused on disciplined commercial execution, cost control, and navigating a market environment that is expected to remain challenged until broader industrial activity improves. Now, I will turn the call over to Jim to discuss Personal Care.
Jim?
Jim Minicucci
Thank you, Alessandra. I'll now highlight our Personal Care results.
Please turn to slide 12 for Personal Care. Personal Care delivered resilient results, underscoring the stability of the portfolio despite mixed market conditions.
Sales were $123 million, down 8% year-over-year, almost entirely due to the Avoca divestiture, which reduced sales by approximately 7%. With the Avoca divestiture now lapped, we have a clean baseline going forward into Q2.
Organic sales declined 1%, reflecting a broadly stable demand environment. Biofunctional actives continued to perform well and delivered another quarter of double-digit growth versus prior-year quarter.
Customer expansions and project pipeline conversions are accelerating. Caressence, our 2025 hero product launch, is gaining broad-based market adoption.
Caressence mimics 20 collagen sequences in our skin, providing immediate flash hydration and corrects the appearance of both expression and deep wrinkles in the skin. Microbial protection delivered year-over-year volume growth above market, driven by share gains across most regions and customer wins.
With a competitive and regional footprint, microbial protection is well positioned to continue executing on a robust opportunity pipeline. Within care ingredients, performance varied by region and segment.
In general, most regions performed well, with notable strength in the EMEA region and China. Care ingredients experienced several unplanned customer plant outages in the quarter and softer demand in North America.
Foreign exchange contributed approximately $3 million of favorability to segment sales. For Personal Care, innovation and commercial execution remain a strength, with continued momentum in our globalized platforms and sustained demand for higher-value, differentiated applications.
Turning to profitability, adjusted EBITDA was $26 million compared to $30 million in the prior year. This includes a $1 million EBITDA impact from the Avoca divestiture.
Excluding that portfolio action, EBITDA was modestly lower, driven by the more than $4 million Calvert City impact and the demand trends noted earlier, partially offset by mix and cost discipline. EBITDA margins remained healthy at 21.1%, demonstrating the strength of the portfolio and the benefit of ongoing commercial and productivity efforts.
Personal Care continues to deliver strong performance in our globalized platforms, resilient margins, and meaningful traction in our innovation pipeline. Now, I'll hand it over to Dago to review the results of Specialty Additives.
Dago?
Dago Caceres
Thank you, Jim. Please turn to slide 13.
Specialty Additives continued to operate in a muted demand environment during the first quarter. Sales were $102 million, down 11% year-over-year.
Coatings and construction accounted for the vast majority of the year-over-year shortfall. In coatings, the decline was led by China, where weak demand and structural overcapacity continued to weigh on results.
Additional softness came from export markets in the Middle East, Africa, and India, where competitive intensity remained elevated. North America continued to show muted demand in the coatings market.
Outside these regions, coatings demand was relatively stable, with outperformance in Europe and Latin America. Construction volumes were also lower, reflecting soft conditions across the nonstructural repair and remodel market, our primary area of exposure.
Across other industrial end markets, including energy and performance specialties, demand remained muted, but generally stable. Pricing was modestly lower year-over-year, while foreign exchange contributed approximately $2 million to sales.
Importantly, the team continues to execute on operational efficiency initiatives and capture benefits from prior manufacturing optimization actions, including the HEC consolidation, which improved our cost structure and mitigated the impact of lower volumes. Adjusted EBITDA was $15 million, up 15% from the prior year.
EBITDA margin improved to 14.7%, a 340 basis point expansion supported by efficiencies from the consolidated HEC network. The team remains sharply focused on cost discipline and commercial excellence, while continuing to advance innovation that helps our customers deliver differentiated solutions in a challenging market.
Underscoring the strength of our innovation pipeline, we delivered approximately $5 million in sales from recent product launches this quarter. Looking ahead, Specialty Additives is well positioned to benefit from an eventual coatings recovery, supported by disciplined cost management, a more efficient manufacturing network, and ongoing innovation progress.
With that, I'll hand it back to William. William?
William Whitaker
Thanks, Dago. Please turn to slide 15.
As we move through the first quarter, I want to highlight the progress we're making across our Execute pillar and how our operational transformation continues to support the business. Overall, our total cost savings target of approximately $30 million for fiscal 2026 remains on track.
Specifically, our restructuring plan is completed and will be ratably recognized throughout the first half of the fiscal year. We continue to make progress on our network optimization targets.
VP&D optimization and small-plant consolidation efforts also remain on schedule, with benefits weighted towards the second half. As we talked about last quarter, we are addressing higher-than-expected unit costs at the consolidated HEC site as we scale operations.
Following the Parlin closure and network volume rebalancing, we are delivering productivity improvements and stabilizing operations while strengthening the global HEC network. Our total savings target of $50 million to $55 million remains intact, with upside to $60 million as China demand improves.
Across the network, we're seeing potential for additional productivity improvements and capacity optimizations. This work is ongoing, but the trajectory remains positive.
Our priorities within Execute remain clear: deliver structural cost improvements, simplify the network, and enhance systems and processes, which include sales and operations planning, standard costing, and forecasting, all of which strengthen planning, accountability, and, ultimately, performance. I want to recognize our operations team for managing through isolated challenges this quarter.
I will speak to these dynamics further in the outlook. Please turn to slide 16.
I'd now like to provide an update on our Globalize and Innovate platforms. As we move through fiscal 2026, I'm encouraged by the early-year momentum we've seen across both pillars.
On Globalize, we're seeing solid traction supported by increased customer engagement, focused commercial initiatives, and early benefits from our recent investments. Year to date, we've delivered $3 million of incremental globalized sales towards our $20 million goal for the year, with notable contributions across the portfolio.
In aggregate, the globalized business lines grew 8% versus last year. On the Innovate side, momentum was even stronger.
We delivered $6 million of incremental innovation sales towards our $15 million goal for the year. This reflects the continued strength of our innovation pipeline, particularly in pharma cellulosics, as well as recent commercial introductions across multiple segments.
Guillermo will speak to this in more detail shortly, but the team continues to advance a broad and healthy launch pipeline. The early performance across Globalize and Innovate highlights the strength of these levers and the strategic advantage they bring to our portfolio.
While still early in the year, we remain on track to deliver our fiscal 2026 $35 million revenue commitment from Globalize and Innovate. Please turn to slide 17.
I will now walk through our updated fiscal 2026 outlook, which reflects a prudent view of market conditions and continued confidence in our ability to execute. For fiscal 2026, we are narrowing our adjusted EBITDA range to $400 million to $420 million.
All other elements of our guidance remain unchanged. Let me briefly summarize the assumptions underlying this outlook.
Life Sciences and Personal Care remain resilient, supported by stable end markets and momentum across our Globalize and Innovate platforms. Specialty Additives and Intermediates remain mixed, with a coatings recovery expected to be gradual and regionally uneven until broader housing and industrial activity improves.
We're seeing healthy demand patterns in consumer-oriented categories to start the second quarter. Raw materials are expected to be stable to favorable overall, and supply chains remain reliable.
Similar to prior years, we expect a second-half weighted performance. We continue to expect Innovate and Globalize to drive growth above underlying markets, and our total cost savings target of $30 million remains on track to support margin improvement through the year.
As Guillermo discussed, repairs to the Calvert City unit are taking longer than anticipated. What we had initially expected to be contained to the first quarter will now extend into the second.
In recent weeks, we also experienced brief outages at multiple sites due to adverse weather. While the operations team managed safely without customer disruption, these events resulted in incremental costs and downtime.
Our revised outlook reflects approximately $11 million of temporary impacts from the Calvert City startup delay and recent weather-related disruptions, all isolated to the second quarter. The volume-related impacts, which were roughly two-thirds of the overall total, are fully recoverable, but the timing of absorption recovery is more challenging.
VP&D cannot begin recovering absorption until the unit is back at normal operating rates, which will not occur until late Q2. This means recovery can only begin in Q3, with partial flow-through on the income statement into Q4.
For HEC, recovery depends on the seasonal demand lift. Visibility into April through September demand typically firms in March, which creates uncertainty about when and how much recovery can be prudently initiated.
Given these timing constraints and the current visibility on seasonal demand, we believe it is prudent to remain more cautious at the top end of the guide. We will continue to manage production, inventory, and free cash flow with discipline while ensuring uninterrupted customer supply.
Overall, our fiscal 2026 guidance reflects balanced planning, disciplined execution, and visibility into the drivers of long-term value creation, even as we manage temporary operational challenges. With that, I'll turn the call over to Guillermo to discuss our technology platforms and leadership priorities.
Guillermo?
Guillermo Novo
Thank you, William. Please turn to slide 18.
Innovation remains one of the most powerful drivers of long-term value creation at Ashland. The momentum we're seeing this early in fiscal 2026 is both exciting and strategically important.
This slide highlights just a few of the breakthrough platforms that are reshaping our pipeline and opening new opportunities across multiple end markets. These are not isolated projects.
They're scalable technology platforms built on science, customer collaboration, and discipline execution, each with potential to fuel long-term growth. Since the 2025 Innovation Day, our teams have delivered meaningful progress across multiple platforms.
Our TVO technologies continue to advance through early commercial adoption, supported by regulatory filings across all key regions and multiple customer qualification cycles. In ag, our TVO for seed coatings, Agrimer ecocote, received US EPA FIFRA approval in 2025 and is also REACH-approved.
Its performance and sustainability profile have been validated by multiple customer trials, with more trials ongoing. Customers are in the process of filing their own regulatory approvals for their formulated products in different regions.
We're also making great progress in the development of a TVO for oil dispersions in ag formulations. This product would already have regulatory approval, the same as our Agrimer ecocote.
In Personal Care, we launched Lubrahas, a TVO-based product for hair conditioning, with great customer feedback, four customer approvals, and many other testing and formulations. Development of our TVO for hairspray and styling is maturing well, nearing generation 1 launch, with encouraging customer evaluations underway.
Our TVO technology for silicone alternatives have passed preliminary testing with key customers and now is in advanced evaluations. In coatings, we continue to make progress on developing TVO technology for TiO2 efficiency and for UV curing.
Based on current performance profiles, all customers are showing strong interest in these technologies. Most other new TVO development projects continue to advance and are demonstrating strong performance and value for our customers.
Our superwetting agent platforms, which offer PFAS-free and silicone-free sustainability advantages, achieved another successful launch in industrial and specialty coatings. Our coatings team recently launched a new version of our wetter, Easy Wet 310, which has broader geographic regulatory approvals and is accelerating commercialization.
We've had successful customer trials and feedback on our new superwetter for ag, validating performance benefits with no phytotoxicity relative to the current commercial wetters. We expect to receive US EPA FIFRA feedback this April.
In Personal Care, we're expanding this technology into hair care and home care applications. In hair, we are currently targeting textured hair, where early beta testing feedback has been very positive.
In home care, we're advancing the superwetter technology for autodishwash applications. In bioresorbable polymers, momentum is building in aesthetic medicine, especially next-generation dermal fillers, with fiscal year 2025 launches and recent customer audits supporting a strong multiyear outlook.
We also continue to scale a strong pipeline with preclinical milestone sales for both generic and new drug development programs. We're also excited about the interest and performance feedback we've received in Personal Care for our new modified starch for rheology control in skin leave-on applications, and we will be launching this product this year.
In addition, we're extending our starch technology into hair styling applications. These platforms are strategically important, each representing a scalable and high-value opportunity that strengthens our ability to compete and win in differentiated markets.
They reflect the combined strength of our science, our global reach, and our ability to commercialize meaningful new technologies. Together, they reinforce why innovation remains a key driver of our long-term growth.
Lastly, although not part of our new technology platforms, our coatings team is launching a number of new multifunctional HEC products this year that can provide unique cost and performance benefits to our customers, including better cost in use and improved performance. Please turn to slide 19.
As we look ahead, I'd like to outline the leadership priorities guiding our execution. While markets are mixed, as anticipated, we enter the year with momentum on several fronts.
The business has become significantly more focused, resilient, and better positioned to drive higher-value growth. Our cost actions are already supporting margin performance, with additional P&L benefits expected as the year progresses.
Our innovation platforms and globalized investments continue to gain traction. Our priorities for fiscal 2026 are clear: deliver on safety, profitable growth, free cash flow, and RONA; advance our manufacturing optimization and inventory performance; accelerate innovation, scale our globalized platforms, and foster a productivity-focused culture; strengthen our systems and process, including leveraging AI to enhance productivity; prioritize talent development, leadership stability, and organizational strength; and maintain transparent communications and consistent execution in our engagement with our investors.
Fiscal 2026 is about converting our transformation into sustained performance. With a more focused and resilient portfolio, disciplined capital allocation, and clear strategic roadmap, Ashland is well positioned to deliver durable value creation for all stakeholders.
Despite temporary operational and weather challenges, our strategy, strong execution, and commercial momentum give us confidence in delivering our fiscal 2026 commitments. Thank you to the entire Ashland team for your commitment and execution, and thank you for joining our call today.
Operator, please open the line for Q&A.
Operator
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, as a reminder to ask a question, please press star 1 1 on your telephone, then wait for your name to be announced.
To withdraw your question, please press star 1 1 again. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster.
Our first question comes from the line of Josh Spector with UBS. Your line is open.
Josh Spector
Hi, good morning. I had two questions.
First, just specifically on Personal Care, can you talk about the comments around the customer outage impacting demand? Is that an ongoing issue?
Is that resolved? Do we catch up from that?
Then second, Guillermo, in some of your prepared remarks from the release last night, you talked about some optimism I think on some of the demand you were seeing building in your second quarter here, just wondering if you can give more color there if that's adding to any visibility or if it's still pretty limited. Thanks.
Guillermo Novo
Okay. Let me a quick comment on the demand, and then on the PC outage, Jim, I'll pass you to give some comments.
If you look at Q1, we started the quarter strong in November, and I think like other companies, November was a bit softer. We did see the pickup really in December and January as also as William commented continued to grow.
It's pretty broad-based in terms of Life Science and Personal Care. I would say in coatings it's in line with our expectations.
I'm not overreading the coating side because this is still low in the seasonality. The season really starts to pick up in March and really April to September is when we see the bigger volume.
It's a bit early, but it's been stable and I would say no big surprises. Overall right now, we're not trying to overread.
No, there's nothing really to change our outlook. We're pretty confident and I think over the next two months we should start picking up.
Our order book for February still remains strong too. We'll see how that evolves.
Obviously, we have now, I'm in China, Chinese New Year and all that. It'll be a weaker February, but into March it should pick up.
Then on the PC side, we just had our own outages on things and so they're temporary and recoverable. Jim, you want to comment on the outages?
Jim Minicucci
Thanks, Guillermo. Hey, Josh.
Thank you for the question. As William had mentioned, excluding those customer outages, the business would have been up low single digits.
Specifically in North America, there were several customers that had unplanned outages. The outages were on the customer side, it was not related to our inability to supply or anything driven from our side.
Through conversations with customers, we understand that it was not demand-driven either. The outages all occurred in Q1.
Some of them were multiweek with a couple of them extending over a month, almost two months in one case. They all are back online.
They all came back online before we closed Q1, and we do expect to recover most of it in Q2 and through the balance of the year. We are starting to recover some of that in Q2 and by the end of the fiscal year, we do expect to recover most of that impact.
Josh Spector
Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. Please stand by for our next question.
Our next question comes from the line of Michael Sison with Wells Fargo. Your line is open.
Michael Sison
Hey, good morning. For Personal Care, should we see volume start to turn the corner here in the second or third quarter?
Think Avoca's done, right, in terms of the outlook? Do we start to see positive volume growth?
Guillermo Novo
Yeah. Avoca is done as Jim said, so that from the comps are going to be cleaner.
If we see just the macro on the consumer side, it's behaving resilient overall. Most of our customers are indicating that it's flat to up in the single digits.
From a volume perspective, we expect to continue to see that as the year progresses. No big surprise there, Mike.
Michael Sison
Great. Then maybe just revisiting kind of the longer-term outlook.
How do you think about rebuilding EBITDA to higher levels from here?
Guillermo Novo
I think a lot of it has to do, as we look at our strategy, Execute, Globalize, Innovate. Execute is about productivity.
We've got a lot of projects going through. We're already seeing the benefits.
You see it with all the impacts on markets and competitive dynamics over the last year. Our margins continue to hold up, and I think that's a reflection of a lot of the productivity actions.
We're already doing that. Obviously, as volumes pick up, we'll have a lot more leverage in terms of our absorption and most of our key plants.
Volume pick up obviously will be very helpful. For now, we continue to remain focused on driving that productivity.
Most of the projects are going very well. I think that the one plant that we're putting a lot of effort on because of all the HEC network optimization is our Hopewell plant.
They're very busy. There's a lot of activity there.
When we closed Parlin, they've brought a lot of products. We've had a little bit of cost issues there, so that one we're going to continue to focus.
Obviously, the storm that was one of this plants that was hardest hit, some of those initiatives have been stalled a little bit just as a result of the storm. We're focused.
We have a clear agenda and we're going to continue to drive that. The rest is going to be the Globalize, Innovate.
All those are higher-margin areas and the more we can grow, the more we can extend our margins and our EBITDA. Equally, I would say in Life Science, a lot of the cellulosics growth that we're seeing in our core businesses are all higher-margin businesses.
Michael Sison
Got it. Thank you.
William Whitaker
Mike, just to add, it's William. I think the other key piece to keep in mind is we have the $90 million program outstanding, right?
That's the combination of the restructuring and the manufacturing optimization. We got 25 of that in fiscal 2025.
We've committed to another 30 in fiscal 2026. That leaves another 35 yet to play out.
That's the other component on top of what Guillermo referenced on the productivity side. I just wanted to make sure you had those levers as well.
Michael Sison
Got it. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of John Roberts with Mizuho.
Your line is open.
John Roberts
Thank you. On the China coatings demand, is there a line of sight to the bottom so that you'll begin at least comping flat year-over-year at some point?
Guillermo Novo
Yeah. Let me make some comments and then Dago, if you could comment.
I'm here right now in China. I would say a lot of the impact of the down market started last year and it's already happened, most of the impact with our customers.
I don't expect that this is going to improve that quickly. We see a lot of actions by the government to stimulate, to reenergize the property market, but the reality is it's going to take a while.
I think the issue for here is going to be expect muted demand for a while. With the overcapacity, we're going to continue to see deflationary pressures across the board.
Most of that has already happened. We've been hit hard in our business here in China, we're bottoming out.
There's a limit to how much you can lose path. When you've lost the business, you can't lose more.
I think what I'm excited now is the team, we've rebalanced the network so that we're not getting impacted with empty capacity in our plants. We're using a very cost-effective plant for us.
We're using it for exports now around the world and especially in the Middle East and Africa. Positioned.
Today just talking to our teams, they've really done a fantastic job in just looking at our portfolio, using this time to get our plant costs in order, but also expanding our product line both into more cost-effective, different performance cost parameters so that we can compete on the low end and also some higher-performance products that we can provide both lower cost in use, but higher performance. We're expanding our ability to go back into the market in a more constructive way than just price games as we move forward.
Dago, you want to comment on the comps and some of the other things your team is doing?
Dago Caceres
Sure, Guillermo. I think you're spot-on.
The China comps are expected to ease in the second half following the second quarter. We already took the hit first class your comps, we'll be expecting to lap after the next quarter.
That's number one. The other point that I would like to emphasize is what is it that we're making to resolve the situation, right?
What is it that we're working on? There's three points that I want to emphasize.
One is commercial discipline, the other one is productivity, and the third one is innovation. On commercial discipline, it's a lot of focus on volume price management to ensure that we do what's right for the business and there is also a lot of focus on customer intimacy, just staying very close to customers so that we can deploy our innovation.
Productivity, the good news is that Nanjing is a really excellent plant that we have. It's a very strong asset, and they do have very clear productivity improvement targets that we're going after.
I'm very excited about that as well. Probably the best one is really on innovation.
We're moving fast. We're moving with urgency.
We expect some of the results that we're doing on the innovation on our core products to materialize actually in 2026, which will really help us with the situation. The intent here is to protect our core portfolio and basically kind of create products that are made for the China market.
Very excited about what we are doing here. Last point, I just want to reinforce what Guillermo was saying is this is a really good plant.
This is a plant that I will call it a global asset, absolutely. The initial intent was to produce in China for China, but this plant can produce for any other parts of the world.
What we're doing is rebalancing. There is opportunities outside of China for sure that we're going after with a lot of focus.
John Roberts
Then secondly, where are you facing the most risk and uncertainty around global trade issues?
Guillermo Novo
I think the area that we're looking at more is what's Europe going to do? I think there's a lot of push right now for our industry in terms of some of the cost competitiveness, the plant consolidations.
There's a lot of dialogue going on there, but there's no clear decisions on what they're going to do. I would say that's probably the area of focus for us at this point in time.
We don't have anything that I would say specific, but we know that this is probably one of the areas of higher pressure in terms of the regional interest to take some action.
John Roberts
Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. Please stand by for our next question.
Our next question comes from the line of Chris Parkinson with Wolfe Research. Your line is open.
Chris Parkinson
Great. Thank you so much.
Just turning back to Life Sciences, just want to break down that growth algo here now that you're passing multiple years of a little bit of choppiness. When you take a step back, you didn't mention VP&D in the PowerPoint, I'm kind of curious on what effect if any that had on the price mix in the quarter.
Then seems like you're actually gaining pretty decent momentum in tablets and cellulosics. When we look at this for '26 and then kind of into '27, is this finally getting back to just kind of a low single-digit volume growth rate, perhaps a little bit more constructive price mix, and getting margins back up to the prior years levels?
How should we be parsing that out? Thank you.
Guillermo Novo
Let me quick comment and then I'll pass it to Alessandra. She can give more detailed color on the business.
I would say just specifically on the VP&D, the Life Science business has been fine. That's where we had the issue a while back, and you know the story, one big competitor coming back in and all that.
Was the biggest issue for us. That has stabilized, right?
The VP&D, I would say volumes are stable, pricing are stable. That's not the biggest growth driver at this point in time.
We wanted to stabilize it. I think we're seeing that across the world.
That's one of the issues of really driving productivity, making sure that we're going to be competitive, and any pricing that we gave in the past that we're trying to recover it through productivity, asset utilization, all those kinds of things. The team, the broader strategy continues to progress and never really stopped in terms of the cellulosics or some of these other areas.
Alessandra, you could comment on that and on VP&D as you see things would be great.
Alessandra Faccin
Sure. Looking ahead, looking at the next few quarters, we expect to continue to deliver on healthy growth.
Two aspects: looking at the resilient pharma demand roughly low single-digit, and then we are seeing the momentum across our both Innovate and Globalize pillars. That represents around 200 basis points above market on the growth that we are projecting.
As Guillermo mentioned, VP&D is expected to be stable. We just concluded the contract negotiations in Europe, and they were mostly aligned with our expectations on share, and with modest price pressure on certain portfolios.
Net-net, they were in line with our expectations. We remain very much focused in positioning our Globalize, Innovate growth strategies and the share-gaining opportunities.
When you look at injectables, we deliver an outstanding first quarter, double-digit growth versus prior year. We are seeing a strong uptake on new products.
Guillermo talked about this on innovation on his prepared remarks. We are seeing the pipeline expansion and also a very effective regional business development model that we have put in place and which is positioning us to continue to see sustainable above-market growth in the coming quarters.
On tablet coatings specifically, we also saw double-digit growth year-over-year in the first quarter. The pipeline has expanded significantly.
Our production efforts were a focus in the last few quarters. We're seeing that.
We're seeing the good momentum from a productivity improvement in Wilmington, and also the new sites in Brazil and China supporting our growth for the fiscal year 2026. We have a new plant that we announced before in India that is coming up in fiscal 2027.
Guillermo was just in India a few days ago, also visiting the new site, which is coming up in fiscal 2027. Overall, a lot of discipline from a commercial standpoint, on price volume management and the focus in positioning our Globalize and Innovate growth strategies that we are confident on the growth we're projecting over the next couple quarters.
Chris Parkinson
Got it. Thank you.
Just as a real quick follow-up and kind of triangulating some of the things you said to Josh's question. In Personal Care, seems like there's a lot of moving parts, and it seems like you're seeing a decent recovery in the biofunctionals and bioactives, in addition to some new products and MPI momentum.
Is that a functionality of stronger demand in places like Asia, stabilization in Europe? Is it too early to say?
Just I'm trying to get to kind of the growth rates ex the issues on hair care, but it seems pretty constructive. I'd be kind of curious on how you think about that as we progress through fiscal year '26.
Thank you. I think
Guillermo Novo
make it a quick comment and Jim, if you can talk about the specific regions and biofunctionals and all the areas. Just to make one thing clear: if you look at our core Personal Care business, that's the established business that we've had for a long time.
It's pretty stable. Ups and downs are more driven by customer demand than there's not big share shifts thing like that.
The growth is coming from the new things: our Globalize, in both biofunctionals and microbial protection, and in the core is all these new technologies that we're working on that, frankly, Personal Care was the first business really in which we were developing the TVOs and all these products. There is a level of stability.
A lot of these ups and downs, it's the same customers that have been buying some of these products for a long time, and there is a lot of stability there. Jim, if you want to comment a little bit more color?
Jim Minicucci
Sure thing. Thanks, Guillermo.
Hey, Chris. I think we've really been working to make the Personal Care story as simple as possible just given all the different pieces and parts of the portfolio.
I think when you look at Q1, we're very happy with Q1. As you mentioned, biofunctional performed extremely well.
We have stabilization in our base, which we had talked about in the prior quarter. That base continues to be stable and we're seeing even some growth there.
We're more excited by all the work the team has done to expand the biofunctional portfolio. We've gained a lot of new customers, especially in Europe and in China, and we're getting our new product launches into those customers.
As I mentioned, Caressence, I don't want to say a miracle product, but it's something that within three 3 minutes, you already start to feel that hydration. Within a couple hours, you already start to get real glowing in your skin, and the team's done a great job launching products.
We feel biofunctional is really moving in the right direction going forward. Microbial protection, it's all about continuing to grow there, convert opportunities, and we've seen really nice growth across all the regions.
Then as Guillermo mentioned, in our care ingredients business, we had the customer outages specifically in Q1. Aside from that, there's always perhaps some noise as you go into the end of the year.
Generally, it's very stable. The team's done a really nice job converting opportunities, especially in skin.
You will see as we go through the balance of the year, oral care will be, I would say, more smooth this year for us over the next three quarters. Sometimes it tends to be a bit more concentrated in a couple quarters.
It will be smoother through Q2 to Q4. Overall, I would say Q1 really it was the customer outages in North America demand that we're continuing to monitor as I said, a bit of a mixed environment there.
Chris Parkinson
Helpful color. Thank you.
Operator
Please stand by for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Mike Harrison with Seaport Research Partners.
Your line is open.
Mike Harrison
Hi, good morning. Was wondering Alessandra, in Life Sciences, as you mentioned low-nitrite cellulosics, can you help us understand what differentiates those from typical cellulosics and why that's important?
Guillermo Novo
Alessandra, if you could comment just on the ones that we've already launched and the ones that we continue to launch, and not just cellulosics, but the whole theme of high purity that you guys are working on.
Alessandra Faccin
Yeah. We launched the new low-nitrite grades for both Plasdone, which is VP&D, and Benecel cellulosics.
This brings an enhanced product quality basically from a nitrosamine on the pharma industry, and versus the regulatory requirements, right? The pharma companies overall, across the board, not just large pharmas, but generics, all pharma companies are very much focused on that, on bringing the low-nitrite grades for excipients to help with the nitrosamine levels on their formulations.
That has been a good success for us with the launch on the low-nitrite, and we see that more and more in our portfolio expanding with low-nitrite grades, not just on cellulosics in your question, but also on VP&D and other areas.
Mike Harrison
All right, that's very helpful. Then I was also within the Specialty Additives business, was hoping for a little bit more detail on the $5 million of contribution that you're expecting from innovation.
Is that mostly the superwetting agent that you referred to on slide 18? Or maybe what product lines or technologies are really starting to show commercial traction within Specialty Additives?
Thank you.
Dago Caceres
Thanks for the question. I would say it's across the board.
When you look at our strategy for Specialty Additives, there is a heavy focus, of course, on protecting our rheology modifier participation, and we have new products that are going there. Then there is a big effort right now to go beyond this additive into other additives.
You have defoamers, you have wetting agents, you have pH neutralizers, etc. The team has been very focused on expanding our portfolio because it really solidifies the participation that we have with customers.
It gives us higher access, and also it enables us to go after other parts of our customers' portfolio. For instance, we're very strong in architectural coatings.
We know our customers also have participation in industrial coatings. This is really a great opportunity to branch out and to really solidify our position there.
When you look at the sales and what we're working on for this year, because we have very good targets, very strong targets for innovation, really the focus is going to be on: number one, solidifying our position in and differentiating in rheology modification, both synthetic and cellulosic; number two, continue to expand our additives, you're going to see a lot of that, and superwetting agents are included there. Then strategically and longer-term, very much excited about the progress we're making with our platform technologies, in particular TVO and TiO2 spacer, etc., where we do expect to see some good traction this year.
Guillermo Novo
Mike, I wanted to highlight that in my comments, I talked a little bit on the regulatory, if you notice on a lot of these same innovations, not just the innovation and the customer, but the regulatory side. When you're bringing new products to market in today's world, you have to deal with all the approvals for selling these products, and ag and REACH in Europe.
I think the coatings team and the Specialty Additives team has done a wonderful job. The Easy Wet 310, we launched Easy Wet 300, it's working well, but given its profile, we had certain requirements in terms of the regulatory needs.
They were able to go in, modify it enough so that no performance was changed, but it now allows us to accelerate the commercialization because it meets much more of the regulatory requirements around the world. Strategizing as we develop these products and making sure that we're within certain areas to accelerate commercialization within regulatory is really important, and the team's done a very good job there.
That launch will really help us get traction on commercialization. All right, thanks very much.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of John McNulty with BMO.
Your line is open.
Bhavesh Lodaya
Hi, good morning. This is Bhavesh for John.
Just one question from me. Recently, we saw that an oral dose GLP-1 drug was approved by the FDA.
Can you speak to whether your Life Sciences platform has exposure to this line of the oral dose medication? If yes, help us think about the potential for demand pull for this one.
Thank you.
Guillermo Novo
Alessandra, you want to comment on that?
Alessandra Faccin
Sure. Thinking about looking at the GLP-1, both the oral GLP-1 and oral biologics present a significant opportunity for for Ashland.
Our VP&D portfolio is especially relevant to to this space, as it is our tablet coatings. When you think about the the, high-volume, high-throughput needed for the the types of demand that we're talking about, our high-solid coatings, Aquarius Genesis, is is also especially relevant for that.
Currently, we have multiple active projects with some of the biggest pharma players in this space. In addition, we are doubling down on innovation in this area, as we have identified a pipeline with over 80 margin opportunities.
One of those innovations is our sodium caprate, which is a permeation enhancer that we target to launch over the summer. We already have received multiple customer samples requests and are working with several customers on on that upcoming launch for for this summer.
In summary, yes, GLP-1 formulations and the overall overall oral biologics represent a significant opportunity for Ashland. Our VP&D portfolio is of particular interest, and as well our our new innovation programs.
Bhavesh Lodaya
Thank you.
Operator
Please stand by for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of David Begleiter with Deutsche Bank.
Your line is open.
David Begleiter
Hi, this is Dave Begleiter. Guillermo, you mentioned improving momentum in January.
Can you talk about what and easy comps in Q2 across all three segments. What's that mean for volume growth in those segments year-over-year?
Guillermo Novo
As we said, it'll be in line with what we have been forecasting. Personal Care and Life Science, it's in the low single digits and anything over that we need to grow through some of the innovation.
The order book is in line with our forecasts or our updated forecasts and what we're doing, no big surprise there. Same thing, in SA, we're seeing the same thing.
All the orders are coming in line. It's going to be still challenged versus prior year because of China and some of the dynamics there.
If you look at North America, Europe actually did very well for us. I think, I just be cautious in SA.
I'm not going to really be positive or negative until we start getting closer to the bigger season. These months don't mean as much in terms of what the full year is going to come out.
For us, it's reassuring that January and the order book for February remain strong.
David Begleiter
Got it. In terms of the first-half outages, how much of that $20 million-plus do you get back in the second half of the year?
Guillermo Novo
We were going to start working on the first part this quarter, but obviously that's getting delayed. Most of the issues were in the VP&D side in the Q1.
Now that's why we're being a little bit more cautious. In theory, all of it is recoverable.
The issue is when. We want to recover it.
In VP&D, as William said, and again, just to be clear, we're working to get it done as quickly as possible. We're expecting by the second half of the quarter.
Every week counts in terms of being able to improve our performance. We've given ourselves some room there in terms of the timing of when the unit will come on stream.
In our current forecast, it would be at the end of this quarter, which means, as William said, we need to get most of that in the third quarter to impact this year. If not, we do it in the fourth quarter, well we'll recover it, but it'll blow into next year.
VP&D is an issue of getting the plant started and then we can start getting the recovery of the absorption part. There are other costs, especially around the storm, that are lost energy costs that went up, and other repair costs with the freeze.
Not huge other items, but items that have added up that are going to be more of a headwind. I think as William said, two-thirds was absorption, one-third is cost.
HEC is a choice. I think there, I'll be honest, I'm being very conservative until we start seeing the season.
We can always produce more whatever we want. I think this is a time of being prudent, like we've done in other years.
I'm very open of the balance sheet is something we need to look at, not just the P&L. We're not here just to hit one quarter results.
We want to do the right thing for the long term for the company. I think having a solid balance sheet, cash is king in a lot of these times of uncertainty, we're going to be a little bit more prudent.
Again, if the season starts in March, that's probably when we would start making that decision. That means again that third quarter would be the critical quarter to rebuild that extra.
David Begleiter
Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. Please stand by for our next question.
Our next question comes from the line of Laurence Alexander with Jefferies. Your line is open.
Dan Rizzo
Hi. This is Dan Rizzo on for Laurence.
Thanks for taking my question. You mentioned the injectable launches and some of the new products, but just in general, I was wondering how long it takes a new product to ramp up to mid-cycle and then to peak sales, just the timeframe.
Guillermo Novo
It really varies by product line, but like we've said before, we're talking about everything we're doing. We want to show, we want to be very transparent, but reality when these approvals come, they take time.
If you go into the example I would use a Personal Care, if customer X approves and it's a big brand, they have in next, 2027, I'm going to reformulate. They approve now, but they launch in 2027 or 2026.
They have dates on which they're doing. Our issue is make sure that we get the approvals, get everything ready before those launch dates.
We have roadmaps of when all these big brands are doing reformulation. We're working with our customers, and it's very important to hit those dates.
Coatings is a little bit different. They can move a little bit more quickly, but again they do a lot more testing.
If they like it, they want it, but then they have to do some testing. Everybody has their nuance on how they work through.
I would say the pharma is really partnering with them across their entire development cycle. When they're ready to launch, you will go with them, but that's depending if it's a generic, it could be 3 to 5 years.
If it's a new drug, you're in a much longer pipeline. That's what the importance of having strong pipelines.
What we've been doing the last few years is build the pipelines, and that's what I'm excited about, that the technologies have now advanced, that they are in pipelines, we're getting validation. It's really now going into our customers thinking, we like these technologies, when are we going to commercialize, are we going to commercialize this year, next year.
It's a very different conversation as we move forward.
Dan Rizzo
All right. Thank you very much.
Operator
Thank you. Please stand by for our next question.
Our next question comes from the line of Eric Boyce with Evercore. Your line is open.
Eric Boyce
Thank you and good morning. First, could you please provide an update on the contract price renewals that I think recently occurred around year end, and how might when those renewals go into effect impact kind of price by segment in fiscal 2Q and for the balance of the year?
Thanks.
Guillermo Novo
I think most of them, as Alessandra said, are mostly completed when final form in pharma, it's mostly in Europe and that's pretty advanced. I think we're mostly done on there.
I think, the only ones and Dago, you can comment in some regions, we have some now that are ongoing, Middle East, Africa, India, that are going now in the March April timeframe. Most of the other ones are already done.
Dago, any other contract?
Dago Caceres
No, in the case of coatings and the large contracts, I would say North America and Europe, they just follow the calendar year, those contracts are done and I guess the results are as expected. Other areas in Asia, actually the contracts were finalized in October, that's actually their cycle, October to October.
We're only missing areas in Middle East, Africa, India, where we have a couple of strategic customers, and that will be April. The contracts are finalized or are valid starting in early April.
That's the only one that is remaining. We're negotiating as we speak, and we expect to finalize some of those contracts very soon.
Eric Boyce
Great. Then as a follow-up, are any further asset sales, maybe in additives or intermediates, under consideration, either now or previously?
If not, and I suspect not, could you remind on why that may not make strategic sense? Thank you.
Guillermo Novo
We've done a lot of the changes already in terms of selling the parts of the business that we didn't see fit, and most of them were standalone parts. We've consolidated some of the product lines that we didn't like, that we couldn't sell, and we have the asset that we can repurpose.
That was more of our CMC asset in the US and MC asset in Europe, and I think the timing of that was very good. We shut down a plant and consolidated.
All those actions are done. We're going to do some more optimization.
It's more around the productivity, where it would be more units within a plant that we're streamlining so that we can instead of having a lot of equipment and not having them utilized, really focus and invest on the ones that are higher end, that can give us the best costs. That wouldn't involve a sale.
The rest of the business is integrated, and this is the part, it's the same plant that supply across multiple areas. Frankly speaking, just from my past experience with other companies, and all this artificially cutting up things haven't worked out that well.
For us, we like the portfolio we have. It is integrated.
We feel that between the high quality, pharma, Personal Care, and architectural coatings, it is being impacted, but it tended historically to be more consumer-oriented. We see that stability in North America and Europe.
I would say what's happening in Asia is a little bit different than norm. We like those.
We think, focusing on additives, low cost in use, high value in use, it allows the differentiation and we can leverage the scale across the asset. We think that integration is critical and we don't think there's value in artificially it up.
Operator
Thank you. Please stand by for our next question.
Our next question comes from the line of Stephen Haynes with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.
Stephen Haynes
Hey, good morning and thanks for squeezing me in here. Just wanted to ask on your Execute slide, you got the 30 million I think of restructuring, and then there's the additional productivity that currently says still TBD.
I've been hopping between calls, apologies if I missed this, but have you kind of outlined a timeline and maybe how to think about what that uplift could look like relative to the cost savings that you've already kind of disclosed and quantified for us all? Thank you.
Guillermo Novo
We're working through that. We've done a lot of network optimization as we looked at, for example, in our acetylenic chain between the two plants in Texas City, Calvert City.
We had units that overcapacity, they've been overcapacity for a long time. We've consolidated, shut some down, put all our volume on the more productive units, so that's driving our costs and productivity.
As we looked at across other production units, what we're finding is that there is an opportunity to continue to drive. Again, if we have I think simple example, four reactors and they're underutilized, can we concentrate on one or two, put our volumes there, invest in those reactors to get more throughputs, reduce cycle times?
Those kinds of things we're doing. Some of them we're already doing.
We're planning out how much we can get. Others, we create the productivity, but the benefit will come as volumes pick up.
The issue is, productivity you can't wait to have the volume to do it. You do it and as the volume comes, you're just going to be able to leverage it.
It allows us to reduce costs as we do some of these changes. That's the part that we're trying to calculate.
Obviously, the storm and all that, right now our engineers and everybody's have been a little bit distracted over the last few weeks, but we continue to work, and throughout the year, we will be defining that. Our view is going to be continue to do what we're doing now, be very transparent as to the goals that we want to commit to, tell you what we're going to do and then we'll be held accountable to deliver on those targets.
Stephen Haynes
Understood. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, I'm showing no further questions in the queue.
I will now like to turn the call back over to Guillermo Novo for closing remarks.
Guillermo Novo
Thank you, everyone, for participating in our call. We really appreciate it.
We're very excited of that the portfolio is in difficult times performing as we expected. We will continue to drive our strategy.
We believe that that's going to be the best way to generate significant value creation and great optionality for us to really drive our strategy of profitable growth. We look forward to seeing all of you in the near future and having more discussions on Ashland.
Thank you for your interest.
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation.
You may now disconnect.