Tēnā koutou, nau mai haere mai. Hello, everyone, and welcome to Sky's 2026 interim results briefing.

I'm Sophie Moloney, your Chief Executive, and I'm very happy to be joined today by David Mackrell, Sky's Chief Financial Officer. David has been with us close to 7 weeks and is already having a significantly positive impact on our business.

Now, we've got a lot to share today, and to aid with that delivery, we're going to change up our approach. I'll start with the overall highlights for the first half, including an update on the Sky Free acquisition and what it means for our business.

David will then get straight into the numbers and operational performance drivers. I'll then share some detail on the way we're reshaping the business, including our significantly refreshed entertainment strategy, before concluding with the all-important outlook for the full year.

As usual, we'll take your questions at that point. To the highlights.

Our double-digit EBITDA growth is a testament to the hard work of the team, a relentless focus on margin, and the resilience and diversity of our business in a difficult consumer market. Our content bundle remains a critical competitive advantage, strengthened in the half by disciplined delivery, enhancing this value for customers and shareholders alike.

It's not often you get to communicate a nominal price acquisition that's strengthened the balance sheet and enhanced cash flows, but that's exactly what's been achieved here. After 7 months of ownership of Sky Free under our belt, the strategic and financial rationale underpinning this acquisition remains apparent through a $34 million gain on bargain purchase that recognizes the fair value of assets that were acquired for just $1.

Together with strong cash generation from operations, the favorable acquisition terms have driven a significant increase in free cash flow. Nearly 3 years on from setting this ambitious target, we remain on track to deliver a dividend of at least 30 cents per share in FY26.

Turning now to the acceleration of our advertising strategy by the acquisition of Sky Free. As we said at the time, the strong strategic fit and complementary strengths make this a compelling opportunity that Sky is uniquely positioned to realize.

It gives us immediate scale in advertising and digital. It lifts our share of advertising spend, creating a stronger market position.

It expands our digital audience to 1.2 million unique viewers each week. It brings a younger and more diverse audience into a relationship with Sky, including a 71% boost in the 18 to 24-year age group and an 87% increase in female audiences.

The result, therefore, is a dramatic expansion of our reach and commercial impact, achieved in a capital-light way, with a strong start made positioning Sky for further earnings accretion in FY27. To our headline results.

Now, given the number of significant one-off items flowing through the accounts, such as the gain on bargain purchase, we have adjusted for these to allow for a like-for-like comparison of underlying performance. Clearly, there's a lot going on at Sky, with a complex integration to deliver.

Notwithstanding this, we've delivered a strong set of results, with the stand-alone Sky business performing well and the Sky Free business providing an added boost. That's delivered an overall revenue increase of 8% for the combined group, with an impressive 29% increase in underlying EBITDA, moving through to a 77% increase in underlying NPAT that demonstrates our strong execution across the business.

With that, I'll now hand you over to David.

Thanks, Sophie, and good morning, everyone. It's a pleasure to be presenting to you as Sky's new CFO.

In these first few weeks, I've been learning a lot, and I'm really enjoying the excitement and the pace here at Sky. Turning to slide 7 and a look at the drivers behind the 29% increase in underlying EBITDA that Sophie just mentioned.

The most significant is a 6.7% reduction in the Sky stand-alone cost base. This was largely in the programming lines, where we've continued to make disciplined negotiation and spending decisions, and also saw the benefit of lower costs for one-off events.

The direct costs associated with growing the broadband business increased by $4.2 million, and the balance of other expense items came in $2.2 million lower as a result of a focus on cost management throughout the business. The reduction in costs significantly outpaced the 1.3% revenue decline of the Sky stand-alone business.

Moving to Sky Free, which delivered a better-than-expected contribution of $1.7 million in its first 5 months under Sky ownership, achieved through a lower cost base than anticipated. Turning to slide 8 and what is a solid underlying revenue result given the difficult market conditions.

I'll cover off the revenue numbers at a product level shortly, but the key points on this slide are the continued growth of streaming and broadband revenue offsetting a large portion of the Sky Box revenue decline, and secondly, the additional $35.6 million of Sky Free revenue over that 5-month period in the half. Now, taking a look at revenue performance by product and starting on slide 9 with Sky Box, pleasingly, there has been a marked improvement in customer churn back to below 10%, combined with a higher ARPU that includes improved sports penetration and sports pricing, which has slowed the revenue decline.

However, discounting has continued at an elevated rate following Project Migrate and as the adoption of the new Sky Experience has increased to 40%. We continue to prioritize this transition as a key driver of improved customer experience, with clear evidence that it lowers churn.

Sky Sport Now revenue continues to grow, with a 17% growth in customers and ARPU up 8% following a 10% price increase in March of last year. The day pass, which was introduced in May last year, has been incredibly successful, attracting new customers and with good conversion to recurring monthly passes.

It's a game of two halves in the streaming land, with an 18% fall in Neon customer numbers back to levels not seen since December 2020. This has been driven by a lack of acquisition and retention-driving content.

While improved ARPU provided some offset to increase top-line revenue, the result was disappointing. You'll hear more about the way forward from Sophie shortly.

Turning to broadband on slide 11, which is another product firmly in growth, with an impressive 37% increase in revenue and a 27% increase in customers despite a highly competitive market. A change in product mix meant ARPU was relatively stable even after passing on a local fiber company price increase.

Margin remains positive. Sky Venue maintained a stable revenue in a challenging market.

On the whole, licensed premises are going well, but some retailers are doing it tough. While the accommodation sector is inching towards pre-COVID tourist numbers, it's not back there yet.

In the face of this, the venue team continue to innovate, recently launching the business edition of the new Sky Box. They're soon to open up highly targeted digital advertising to reach hundreds of thousands of Kiwi fans watching Sky in commercial premises.

That leads nicely to advertising, where we've continued to expand and evolve Sky's capability over the past 2 years. In that time, we've lifted market share and grown digital advertising from nothing to 16% of Sky's stand-alone revenue.

Now, with Sky Free included, our linear advertising revenue market share has doubled to 35%, and the fast-growing digital segment now represents 20% of advertising revenue. The addition of Sky Free has brought added diversity to our revenue profile, with 15% now coming from advertising.

Having now combined as a single advertising sales team representing all Sky products, we're confident we've got the ingredients to accelerate advertising revenue in the future. We'll now take a closer look at the underlying expenses on slide 13.

Disciplined cost management has been the mantra across all areas, with the most significant being the $23.8 million reduction in Sky stand-alone programming costs, returning this category to be in the target range as a percentage of revenue at 48.8% for the first half of the year. Lower marketing and people costs reduced subscriber-related costs for the 6 months, while the increase in broadcasting infrastructure included higher costs from increased broadband customers and additional technology spend.

Advertising costs were broadly in line with the revenue result. Lastly, Sky Free added $33.9 million to the cost base for the first half, which includes advertising, programming, broadcast, and infrastructure costs.

Underlying capital expenditure for the 6 months of $26 million for the Sky stand-alone business was $13 million lower than the prior period, largely due to last year's earlier replacement of transmission equipment to support satellite migration and a lower spend on customer devices following a period of accelerated investment to build inventory. As a result, capital expenditure was just below the target band of 7% to 9% of revenue.

Turning to cash flow on slide 15 and a strong result for the half of $55 million generated from the core business. The cash balance was boosted by one-off items, including $25 million of cash acquired through the Sky Free transaction and $8 million of compensation from Optus.

That contributed to a very healthy closing cash balance of $100 million. Operating cash flow benefited from improved earnings and favorable working capital movements.

It should be noted that we expect that some of the working capital movement will reverse in the second half, including some of the cash acquired with Sky Free and the contribution for integration costs and to settle outstanding payables. As a result of the strong cash generation, the board has decided to pay a higher percentage of the expected full-year dividend at the half-year.

At 15 cents per share fully imputed, this represents approximately 50% of the full-year guidance and is a 76% increase in dividend on last year. Sky intends to review capital management options following the successful integration of Sky Free, and we will provide a further update with the FY26 earnings announcement in August.

With that, I'll hand you back to Sophie.

Thanks, David. Excellent job.

2 days ago, my team and I addressed close to 700 advertising clients and business stakeholders at our first unified advertiser upfront. It was an important moment to demonstrate the power of our new combined portfolio where audiences and attention in New Zealand reside.

We talked about the scale and strength of Sky's premium sports and entertainment, our refreshed entertainment strategy that puts us in control of our content destiny, and how we use our rich data to not only make disciplined content choices, but also to create value for our advertising clients. Today, I'm going to give you a condensed version, spending a few moments on our content strategy before touching on the numbers associated with that combined portfolio.

First, then, to sport. We're firmly in control of our premium content destiny and destination here by securing long-term agreements with staggered content renewals.

Now, with more events being delivered in stunning 4K UHD, we're bringing fans closer to the action than ever before. This confidence in our year-round offer and steady diet of headline-grabbing sport has supported our recent annual sports price rise.

Now, as you're aware, our sports strategy is underpinned by deep viewership insights, which guide disciplined decisions that align with what our audiences value and what also makes sense for our shareholders. The reset of our NZ Rugby rights agreement, with improved economics and an expanded content slate, is a good example, as is securing the Olympics through to Brisbane 2032.

As you can see on this slide, our year-round sports bundle is unrivaled across international and local competitions. An increasingly important part of Sky's sport offering is where we take fans beyond whistle to whistle with shows like League Lounge with Shaun Johnson, The Breakdown, and Crowd Goes Wild, as well as fly-on-the-wall docos like the excellent Forever Auckland FC, which was just commissioned a second season of.

We don't just deliver the live action. We drive the conversation and fuel the fandom.

As a result, we remain the best choice for content partners. If you want to be where the most Kiwi sports fans are, then there's no better place than Sky Sport.

Now, the joy of Sky is that we get to combine that sport with an incredible array of entertainment shows for our audiences to enjoy. Over the past 12 months, we have carried out an extensive, data-driven review of our entertainment content to understand exactly what our customers watch and value.

We've taken deliberate steps to redefine and strengthen our content pipeline, and we're excited by the opportunities this unlocks. Our recent announcements of the new expanded deal with both Paramount and Sony are clear proof points of our strategy in action.

This review also led us to the strong conclusion that not renewing the HBO rights on a co-exclusive basis is the best decision for Sky's customers and shareholders. The way we've structured our agreements has also evolved, moving away from output deals to create more flexibility to respond to evolving trends.

This means that when a global breakout series lands, like Heated Rivalry, we are more agile and can bring it to this country while the buzz is still live. That focus on flexibility means we have also replaced some of the passthrough channels with options that we can curate ourselves with less repeats, including Sky Comedy and Sky Kids.

I did want to take a moment to have a chat about Neon and our plan to give it a new glow. Neon has always had premium content, but it also needed a premium strategy to match.

The drop in customer numbers that David referenced reinforces the strong call to action by my team. Through the work of our refreshed entertainment strategy, 2026 and beyond is about delivering a steady drumbeat of key titles across the year.

At the same time, we've rebalanced the proposition, to move from leaning heavily into the dark and intense to embracing a more premium, mainstream approach with broader appeal. What Neon customers will also see is a refreshed identity, a clearer content strategy, and a much more consistent content cadence.

This balance is designed to give us something powerful: consistent and more predictable performance. This is definitely a space to watch.

Looking across our full entertainment slate, what we have is a strengthened pipeline of high-quality entertainment from a multitude of studio partners. This includes big, noisy event titles that drive acquisition, recognizable returning franchises that drive retention, and library content that drives hours and loyalty.

Now, I do want to draw out some of the Taylor Sheridan work that is taking the world and our customers by storm, with the upcoming Marshals from the hugely successful Yellowstone series and also The Madison. Our homegrown Kiwi content fits seamlessly alongside these titles, and in 2026, we're commissioning even more local primetime titles for more New Zealanders to enjoy.

Turning then to the power of our expanded portfolio. What we've built is a content slate that works across our products for maximum audience reach and return on our content investment.

We're now connected to a much wider audience as well, reaching over 2.6 million on broadcast each week, 1.2 million weekly on digital, and with well over 3 million followers on social. Across the board, premium paid, free, and streaming, our ecosystem works together, amplifying one another to build on this reach and to drive audience engagement.

Every Sky platform has a clear job to do, and together, they give us an unmatched position and huge opportunities to grow audience, attention, and advocacy. Turning to our outlook and guidance.

We're expecting economic conditions to remain challenging, and this is expected to have an impact on near-term revenue. We also expect programming costs to moderate slightly in H2, and as before, we will continue to focus on managing costs throughout the business.

With the integration progressing well, it's appropriate now to provide our guidance on a combined basis, including 11 months' contribution from Sky Free. This sees combined group-level guidance of revenue of $820 to $835 million, EBITDA of $145 to $160 million, and CapEx of $62 to $68 million.

There's no change to dividend guidance of at least 30 cents per share as we deliver on the FY23 target to double the dividend in FY26. Looking further ahead, we expect earnings growth to continue in FY27, and we remain confident of delivering at least $10 million of incremental EBITDA from group-wide synergies by FY28.

As you can see, there is much opportunity ahead for Team Sky and its shareholders. With that, I'll now hand back to the operator, and we look forward to your questions.

Hey, morning, guys. Congratulations on a great result, and welcome to David.

Thanks, Rob.

Thank you.

Hey, I'd like to start off on the underlying free cash flow of the core business, so that is excluding Sky Free. It's pretty important to understand that so that we can assess the sustainability of the dividend.

There was obviously a great underlying free cash flow result for the core business of $55 mil in the first half, but I understand there was a bit of a boost from some unusual things like working capital movements. Oh, please go on.

Oh, so, yeah. It's a very strong flow, but most of the working capital reversal will come from things that relate to the integration of Sky Free and the payables associated there.

There are some which you would consider relate to the normal business. The tax cash flow in the first half was low and it was reasonably high in the comparative period.

The core earnings is something that should continue to show through. As I said, most of that reversal will come related to the Sky Free acquisition.

I understand that. Thank you.

That's helpful. I just want to understand the magnitude of that reversal.

Just eyeballing it, it looks like maybe there was an extra, say, $20 or $30 mil boost from the one-offs to the $55 mil in the first half and that might reverse in the second half? Is that fair?

The $55 million excludes the $25 million that came through with the acquisition of Sky Free and it also excludes the $8 million that came through from Optus, which relates to costs that were incurred previously. There's no reversal on that $8 million.

Most of the reversal relates more to the $25 and the contribution that was made towards the integration costs and the payables that sat within that Sky Free balance sheet. There is a little bit of working capital reversal that will sit within what you would have called the stand-alone Sky, but it's not significant.

Just to be clear, we might expect, say, a $20 to $30 mil one-offs, right, headwind in the second half, is that right?

I would think of the low end of that range in terms of the reversal.

Oh, wonderful. Thank you.

At the midpoint of guidance, again, ex-Sky Free, I think it implies flat revenue growth year-on-year in the second half. Can you tell me what gives you confidence for that projection?

I think core revenue's been declining year-on-year for the past four halves, and you said the economic situation is expected to remain challenged.

I think the joy of our business now is that diversification of our revenue. You're right, the economic uncertainty and challenge remains, and we have guided with that in mind.

If you think about our half-year performance, seeing growth in Sky Sport Now and in broadband, and yes, you're right, Box and Neon customer numbers not where we want them to be and the Box revenues in decline. There is that broad offset in terms of the subscription, but largely around advertising.

Again, the softness on the linear side, but when you put it all together, yeah, that's what gives us the confidence, albeit it is moderated just given the economic environment. Anything you'd add, David, to that?

No,

I think we've seen a toughish advertising market that's showing out in the marketplace. As we see business confidence and consumer confidence recover, we'd expect to see some recovery in that market.

Sorry, you'd expect to see the macro recover in the second half, is that part of the assumptions, or?

It is. Look, I guess that recovery has been later than everyone expected, but if you look at the most recent sort of consumer confidence, business confidence, we've seen a little bit of an uptick, which could start to play out in the last quarter of our financial year.

To be clear, you're not seeing that kind of either flat revenue or revenue growth in 2H 2026 to date?

Not yet.

Thank you. Excluding Sky Free, the guidance implies a pretty sharp stepdown year-on-year in EBITDA in the second half.

It looks like that's driven by the step up in non-programming costs you flagged at the last results, is that right?

I think the cost base in the second half of last year was I would say unusually low.

There was We obviously had to manage a pretty tough environment in H2, any and all discretionary spend we took out to deliver on our promise to the shareholders in the market. As we said at the time of guiding, we are putting a bit more money back into the kitty, particularly around people, marketing, and a bit into tech.

That's what we're seeing come through in H2. Obviously, if revenue isn't performing, we do know how to operate our business to manage costs right across the piece, and the team really understand that.

You're right to call out that there's a bit of a step-up in H2. Certainly, half on half is a comparison.

That's the reason why.

Cool. No, that makes perfect sense.

Final one from me. I think prior guidance for Sky Free in FY26 was for $1 to $4 mil, I think it's free cash flow, right?

The point is, it assumes $3 to $5 mil of synergies,

and

you've already done $3 mil of synergies in the first half. Should FY26 be at the top end on that basis of the free cash flow?

Look, certainly, we're expecting to deliver at the top end of that synergy level, but as I said, we're still working through the Sky into Sky Free integration. There's a little bit of a road to travel yet, but so far, it is going well.

Just as a reminder, the transitional services arrangement, that agreement concludes at the end of July. The team are working hard to make sure we get through all of that complex technology integration by that juncture.

As you can see, yeah, we've performed well in the first 5 months in terms of capturing those cost synergies. I'm confident that we will be in a good place, but we also just have to be mindful that until we get through that integration and the complexity of it, there might be some unknowns we have to grapple with.

We're just mindful of that in the guidance that we're giving.

For sure. I guess there's been some stuff in the press about how at Sky Free, revenue delivered has underperformed expectations a little bit.

I shouldn't read that as, even though you're doing better on the costs, the revenue is worse, be at the midpoint of the free cash flow guide?

I think we've been upfront that particularly in the linear revenue side is certainly softer than we had anticipated at the time of the acquisition. Having just undertaken the upfront, I feel really confident about the opportunity going forward right across our business.

Yes, in H2, and as David was saying, we're hoping there might be a little bit of an uplift in consumer confidence come Q4, but at this stage, it is still feeling pretty challenged out there for New Zealanders and therefore, the retail brands looking to serve them. No,

that makes sense. Hey, well, best of luck and congratulations on the good result.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Morning, guys. Just a first question on Neon, and sort of if we fast-forward 6 months and a couple months away, past the HBO contract, what do you think success looks like for Neon without HBO?

Is it sort of subscriptions and revenue flat on what they are now? Or do you think there will be expectations that they moderate, but then you get some cost savings on the other side?

Just keen to fresh out your expectations or

Yeah, I think

the goal is.

Certainly, the goal, first and foremost, is to make sure that we've got a this sort of steady diet of titles that actually will keep those customers happy. Certainly, with our disciplined dealmaking, we're going to be certainly going for margin accretion.

It's too early to say what we're expecting in terms of what it looks like at the full year, but what I can say is the titles that we've got coming through over the next few months do give us confidence in seeing better acquisition-driving content. Then the job for my Chief Customer Officer and her team is to make sure that those customers feel the value and stay on the service.

Right now, I am comfortable that we have made the right strategic decision. Now, the job to do is to make sure we're communicating that, that we're refreshing the brand a bit to what we've had to date, and that we're marketing that service in the right way.

We'll obviously have to wait and see what happens in market, what HBO Max looks to do, and we'll be looking to respond as appropriate at that time. It's probably more of a full-year conversation at that stage being able to give you the guidance that will be helpful.

As it stands, we're feeling very good about the path ahead.

No, perfect. Second one, just on talk about reviewing capital management options at the full year.

I think, obviously if we look at that net cash position, even if some of that unwinds and even if stepping up the dividend, is that sort of indicating maybe there's a special dividend or some sort of return on capital to shareholders? Is that what you're sort of indicating?

We're not actually indicating any specific option at this stage. We're just really mindful of, as you say, a positive cash balance and therefore making sure we're doing the right thing by the business in terms of investment, but also shareholders for their loyalty.

I do think the upping to the 50% of the full year at the half year should show the confidence we have in looking to deploy some of that capital in the near term back to shareholders. That said, we do have this complex integration to get through.

We do have an economy that is challenged, and we're in an election year, we are mindful of that. We're always struck by the different options we get to with investors.

We'll be definitely be taking soundings at the full year and be making sure that we're doing the right thing for the business and investors at that juncture. Any and all options will be no doubt traversed with the board.

Yeah. Then last one, just on Sky Free in terms of the cost synergies achieved.

It's obviously been a pretty good cost-out side of the business if revenue's going softer. Where have those sort of come from?

Is it just sort of the easy low-hanging fruit to date, and then the path from here will be a bit tougher to see? Or have you got all of this cost out over the next sort of 18 months all indicated exactly where it's coming from and it's just a matter of acting on it?

Look, we said at the time, we'd structured the deal to give ourselves the room, and it was high-certainty cost synergies. I think we're showing that that was spot on, but it's not in one place.

It's right across the board, right across broadcast infrastructure, tech, some in people, thinking about systems and operations. What I would say is yes, we are looking ahead, and the deal that we did and deep due diligence at the time is giving us that confidence, but it's right across the board.

Perfect. That's all for me.

Cheers.

Thank you.

good morning. Just a couple of questions on Neon, firstly.

It seems to me like removing that HBO content from Neon is a bit like removing the All Blacks Test matches from the sports package. I guess this first question is, is there a refresh in pricing coming downwards for Neon?

No, I disagree with that reference, Arie. I think you're right to say that there isn't anything substitutable with the All Blacks.

I think that's fair in sport. I don't think it's right to say that around the entertainment space.

As we've shared, last year for us, Yellowstone was the outstanding performer and therefore leaning into that Paramount deal for premium US scripted drama and thinking more broadly about the substitutability of that content, we think is going to drive the right outcomes for Neon. Ultimately, customers get to choose.

Don't think for a second I'm not saying that HBO Max doesn't have premium content, it does, but they're not the only provider in market. At this stage, there's certainly no change to pricing.

Obviously, as we get closer to year end, we'll be having a good look at where we're at and what the customer response and feedback is and be looking to respond accordingly. The slate that we have, we think is going to be more compelling for our customers.

No, thanks. Then I guess just with regards your comments regarding a continuation of earnings growth in FY27, and obviously I understand that at the front end of the beyond FY26 period, you've got the rugby benefit coming through, and potentially some earnings accretion from free-to-air in time.

I guess the business is constantly evolving and you'll have NRL rights. If I look at the rate of Sky Box revenue decline, it's still pretty chunky.

Not quite double-digit, but pretty high. What's sort of your view at this juncture on sort of your medium-term sort of outlook for earnings?

If you're not in a position to sort of comment on that at the moment, is your intention, coming to the end of this last 3-year target period, to set targets to FY29 when you report the FY26 results?

You're right that we are coming to the end of the 3-year target delivery and feeling good about that. As I said earlier on the call, I think that the joy of our business now is that diversification of the revenues.

You're right to call out the softness in Sky Box, but we have significantly reduced our exposure to that in terms of, particularly with the acquisition of Sky Free. What gives me real confidence is our programming as a percentage of revenue, obviously a vitally important target that we are delivering on and on target to deliver on for this year.

That's obviously across sport and entertainment, as we've just been talking about, making sure we're striking the right balance of the value we can give to rights holders, but also for customers and therefore shareholders. I do have real confidence in what we're doing in that space.

Then across our business, there will be technology that we need to invest in. We've obviously got a number of platforms that's been talked about off the back of this acquisition.

Again, we've got room in our CapEx profile. To note that we're actually below the 7% to 9% is obviously a green tick there.

It really is the ability to invest once in content that we can then manage right across audiences throughout our business. We showcased that at the upfront this week with advertising clients, and I think the enormity of that opportunity came through.

I sit here going, well, it's not going to be one thing, and probably 10 years ago, it was one thing, right? You're spot on that we've massively evolved our business.

We do know how to drive earnings accretion, and with David here, I have high confidence that we're going to keep on that path.

The reality is EPS is sort of broadly in line with where it was at the start of the 3-year period. If anything, EBITDA looks like it's going to be slightly down on FY23.

You've definitely demonstrated your ability to stabilize the business, but yeah, on those measures, the earnings, given these pressures ongoing in revenue, haven't really shown through yet. I guess just to the last part of the question then, because why the business is actually in some respects getting more complicated with that diversification, is the intention to put new 3-year targets out to FY29 when you present FY26?

I think we'll definitely be having a good look, and to that point, be thinking about what's the most important measures that we might want the market to assess us on. We're in a process at the moment, Arie, of having a look at what the next pathway looks like.

I think, with David here, we'll be having a good look and at the full year be able to update you. If you have any feedback, which I'm sure you will, we'll happily hear from you, because I am determined to get you to a place where you actually do have the positivity about our outlook that I do for this business.

I think we have, yes, it's been an incredibly challenging consumer market, no question, but I think we are in control of our content, and that's not just about what we acquire, right? With this acquisition of Sky Free, there's a significant uplift in our commissioning of content, and you're also seeing in the sports space, we've now got a team who are fueled up to actually deliver beyond whistle to whistle.

When I put all of that together, being able to control that content destiny, maximize that investment right across all audiences across our platforms, I think we're really well placed to come to the full year and think about, okay, what will it look like by 2030, and what do we want the market to mark us on? That's all to play for, Arie, no doubt we'll get your feedback when we meet a little bit later.

Oh,

that's great. Thanks.

Just on Discovery, and it's early days, and I guess you would have sort of expected a soft advertising market when you sort of acquired it and looked at the base revenue. It is a little concerning to sort of see that the revenue outlook sort of downgraded by circa 10% for this year this early on.

Can you just sort of, I guess I've got two questions. The first one is that seems to be, but you would have better market data than I can access in real time, that seems to be a bigger scale-back in revenue than the soft TV ad market.

Let me know if that's not the case. Then also, and you have had a positive surprise in terms of the incoming cost base, but are you confident that if the outlook for free-to-air ad spend doesn't improve that you can cut costs fast enough, given this initial trajectory sort of highlights that things can move pretty quickly in this free-to-air ad space?

Yes, I do have confidence, and I don't think it's correct to say that our projection is higher than the market projection. It is about the linear side, but as we communicated at the time, we did a huge amount of revenue sensitivity analysis to ensure that the board was comfortable that this was the right acquisition for us to proceed with.

Yes, I do have confidence. I think the other piece of this is to say that it's that diversification across the digital side, but also in terms of branded content and sponsorships that again, with our world-leading sport bundle and the attention that that gleans, that gives us confidence in terms of thinking about how we're going to price that in, the CPMs that we can generate.

Again, yes, the linear market is softer than we anticipated, but am I concerned about driving earnings despite that? No, I'm not.

Then

last question just back to the Sky Box. Obviously you've gone through this period where you've had to rebase the Sky Sports package on the Box.

We've had several years of double-digit or near double-digit price increases. That's partly been to bring it into line with the value you're offering through it, and then also to sort of the extra content you've acquired.

As I reference, Sky Box revenue declines are ongoing. Are you at a point now where you're going to look to, sort of, I guess, try and stabilize those revenues, perhaps look at the total sub numbers over sort of ongoing price increases?

Just interested on whether we're going to see what the next evolution of the pricing strategy on Sky Sport is in particular, given those revenue declines remain reasonably meaningful.

Look, I think that ultimately how customers choose to consume their sport is up to them, and we'll keep meeting them where they are. Our Box business remains vibrant, the new Sky Experience.

We know that we get the benefit in terms of churn and Net Promoter Score with that, particularly as customers enjoy 4K UHD. Just to give comfort, yes, you're right.

We have been putting in price increases around our sport because of the investment we're making, and just to note, we obviously have the Black Caps touring in October with that cricket returning to Sky. There's a cost to delivering that for customers, so that's also reflected and goes into our thinking.

We are still growing sports subs, and so that's an important marker for us. More broadly to your question, yes, we know we need to think about the overall opportunity, both in sport and entertainment.

I do want to make sure that on the app, if you're choosing to be there, you do have the day pass. You can get a great deal if you do the annual.

You'll always get a better deal at that juncture. There is some delta between that and the Box side.

Now the Box comes with other benefits of recording and a starter pack that we've actually put more value into with Sky Comedy and Sky Kids. We are really conscious of trying to strike the right value and make it as easy for customers, but ultimately, Arie, they can choose how they want to engage with us.

I'm not going to be talking about stabilizing revenues here and there, because I don't think we need to talk about that anymore. In time, I think we need to talk about blended ARPUs across our business, and we will look, I think as part of our full year, to start to potentially move to some of that.

Or you might expect to see it as part of the look forward. A long way of saying, really comfortable with the way that we're progressing on our sport pricing.

We're really mindful of where customers are, but we do think it's incredible value, and I'd highly, highly recommend 4K UHD for those customers who like their sport.

Thanks, Sophie.

Thanks, Arie.

Morning, Sophie and David. Just a few from me.

Just kind of following on from that topic, Sophie, I noticed on the Sky Box you've now got 74% of the base on sport, which I think was up. I'm assuming that the churn profile of sports customers is quite low.

I'm just wondering, as that percentage starts increasing, at some point do you think we get to an inflection point, which we did get, I think, a few years ago, but at some point, I'm not sure whether we have to wait till the subscribers get right down so sports customers are 100% of the base or whether it's a higher number, when you start seeing the churn actually being kind of abating, possibly even going positive?

I think it's encouraging to see our overall churn slipped below the 10%, and you're right to note that sport penetration is powerful. I can tell you, though, the best churn metrics we have is where we have customers on sport and entertainment.

The more utility, the more engagement, the happier customers are. That's a really important part of that churn mix for us.

As you see, we haven't been putting up entertainment pricing. It is about the sport, but it's the combination of that on the Box side where we see the most churn benefit.

We're not in a place at the moment where we're forecasting what you're referencing, because actually that entertainment offer for those customers is really valuable, including the passthrough news that they get through it. We're a long way off getting to what you're indicating, but obviously at the full year, we can talk more about the projections for potentially the next few years, but we'll see.

No, that sounds good. Just the second one just on Sky Free.

My understanding talking to industry participants is that the first quarter of 2026, the ad market in New Zealand was terrible. Then the second quarter quarter got a little bit better.

Can you give us, because obviously I think you bought the business in the in that first quarter, can you give us any color onto kind of what was what was driving that first-quarter performance and why it was so bad? Then what happened in the second quarter?

The linear TV market certainly hasn't been improving. It's been under more pressure.

You're right, we did acquire end of the first quarter. Of course, as you do this, when you acquire an asset, there is a big integration.

It is disruptive for those involved, and we've been trying to minimize that distraction. I think what we're excited about and really encouraged about is the response to our upfront this week about that opportunity, this combined portfolio.

As we look forward with the team, particularly to Q4, as David indicated earlier, particularly if consumers feel a little bit more buoyant with their household wallets, we'd be hoping to see a bit of a recovery on the linear TV side. I don't know if there's anything you'd add, David.

You're obviously sitting across the way at that stage.

No, look. I think, clearly, the first quarter and the second quarter didn't see much recovery in the linear TV market from the data I've looked at.

We haven't seen a lift yet as we look through into this third quarter. As I said earlier, we are seeing positive signs on that business and consumer confidence front, which tends to be a lead indicator for advertising spend in general.

What about,

you do get some forward bookings, right, for the calendar year? Is there any comment on how those are looking?

No, the team are out there now with this combined offer and in good conversation off the back of the upfront with agencies and clients. I think there were some who wanted to sponsor The Crowd Goes Wild off the back of the event, so that's really positive.

No, there's nothing further we're going to be able to give you in terms of that. Obviously, it's a full-year update that we'll be able to talk to you about the actuals that we've delivered.

Just in terms of that services agreement with Discovery, what happens if you don't make the end of July deadline? What's the implications of that?

We've got a team who will make sure that we do or we'll be able to have a conversation at that stage if we need to, but I'm confident with our MatchFit technology team in particular that we're going to be in good stead at that juncture just given the way that we have structured the transitional services arrangement. We have a weekly SteerCo with the teams, and all the various work streams are planning for this.

The joy of it, unlike Migrate, is it's not a big switchover. There's ability to sort of parallel-run or dual-run or deliver in a way that makes sense.

We're not anticipating any issues, but we obviously did provide a bit of room if we needed to go beyond that. What's critical for us, though, is that we actually do really want to get on with delivering on the benefits of this transaction.

We did it on the basis of cost synergies, not revenue in terms of the way we assessed it, but we do see that combined offer and therefore the combined guidance. I'm really excited about that being in market now, it's one team and one delivery.

More to come, no doubt, at the full year.

Just, I suppose, looking at the note to the accounts in terms of the acquisition of Discovery, it looks like there is a deferred tax loss asset in Discovery. It's $78 million.

Is that because, obviously, you didn't pay any tax in the half. Is there a situation where Sky won't be paying much tax for the next few years, and what are the implications for that in terms of the imputation credit balance?

Obviously, the acquisition brought with it the history of that Discovery business in New Zealand, and there is various abilities to utilize those tax losses within that business. We're just working through how that will play out.

I wouldn't want to comment yet on future tax liabilities and how that might roll out. At this stage, we've got plenty of imputation credits to pay dividends.

Nothing more to say at this point.

Great. That's all for me, thanks.

Thank you.

Good morning and congratulations on a great result. Look, I just had one question really around your approach to the dividend.

If we assume that 30 cents is the number, I know it's at least 30 cents, but 30 cents sort of implies a 50/50 first half, second half dividend split, which is a departure from your normal 40/60 split. I note that in the presentation pack there, there's a comment that we could expect you to revert back to that 40 split 40/60 split in future years.

Given the fact that companies really like to pay a dividend below the PCP, that would sort of infer on a 40/60 split a 2027 dividend of closer to 38 cents a share. I was just sort of wondering had you considered the prospect of paying a lower dividend in the first half '27 if you reverted back to the 40/60 split, or whether the 15 cents is a new base for a first-half dividend?

I think the 50% is just in recognition that it's a very strong free cash flow delivery, cash on hand. That was really the board acknowledging also that it's tough out there, particularly for our retail shareholders, just wanting to uplift that, but it shouldn't be a read-across to future years.

Obviously, we will be assessing and guiding at that time. Warren, I wouldn't want you to make any other assessments other than just to acknowledge the strong cash balance and therefore a desire from the board to share their confidence in a bit of an earlier dividend payout for our loyal shareholders.

Okay. All right.

Fine. Thank you.

Thanks, Warren.

Thank you all very much for joining. It remains a real privilege and pleasure to lead this company and deliver what we do for New Zealanders and, all importantly, for our shareholders.

Thank you for that support, and we look forward to engaging in no doubt robust conversations in the days and weeks ahead. Thank you.