Good morning, everyone, also from my side. Thank you for joining us today in this conference call regarding the half-year financial report for 2026.

My name is Heiko Wuttke, CEO of PNE AG, and I am accompanied by Dirk Simons, CFO. Before I begin with the presentation itself, I would like to comment on the latest news.

On Monday evening, we published an ad hoc announcement in reaction to recent media reports. Since these reports had cited a possible price range that did not reflect the current demand situation, we were, from a purely legal standpoint, obliged to respond and set the record straight.

In the announcement, we provided an update on the current status of the sales process which we have initiated to identifying investors as part of the further development of our business strategy. However, it is currently uncertain whether a transaction will materialize and what its terms would be.

Please understand that we are unable to comment further on the ongoing process, but we will inform the market of any relevant further developments in accordance with applicable law. Let me give you an overview of the presentation and the course of today's webcast on slide 3 of the presentation.

As usual, I will begin with a summary of the H1 2026, followed by an update regarding the operating business. Then I will pass over to Dirk for the financials.

After that, I will conclude the presentation with the outlook for the remainder of 2026. We will then open the line for questions, and as always, our slides can be found on our Investor Relations website.

Before I continue with the operating business, I would like to welcome Dirk to his first webcast in his role as CFO of PNE AG. As our former CFO, Harald Wilbert, has asked the Supervisory Board to release him from his duties as a member of the Board of Management for personal reasons, and Dirk, who was our former Chairman of the Supervisory Board, took over and provides a very strong solution to address the upcoming tasks.

Thank you, Dirk. We are really happy to have you on board.

Having said this, I would now like to draw your attention to slide 5. Ladies and gentlemen, we are pleased to share that we have achieved important milestones in a challenging first half of 2026.

We successfully sold projects in our core markets Germany, Poland, and France with a total output of 163 MW in total: 5 wind projects with a total capacity of 122 MW, and 1 PV project with 41 MW peak. In addition, we completed 2 wind projects with 52 MW: 1 with 18 MW for our IPP, and 1 with 34 MW for third parties.

Our own IPP portfolio now stands at 484 MW after the successful sale of the wind farm Bokel with 25 MW and the addition of Gnutz Ost with 18 MW. Power generation increased to 408 GWh, which is an increase of 11% compared to H1 2025 due to higher wind yields in the German onshore wind market.

Also, the total output of our services business grew to €20 million, a plus of 12% year-over-year with good margins. I will elaborate in more detail on the next slides.

Our total output in the first half of 2026 was at €123.3 million. Revenue grew to €96.8 million, which is an increase of 31% year-over-year.

Our normalized EBITDA, adjusted for one-off items, and our EBITDA increased to €27.4 million, clearly up from €4.7 million in H1 2025. Please remember, from 2026 financial year onwards, normalized EBITDA will serve as the key financial performance indicator for our guidance as it provides a better and more accurate picture of our operating performance.

With this, let's move on to the project pipeline on slide 7. Our project pipeline wind onshore and PV remains stable compared to the end of 2025 at 21.7 GW.

Thereof, the pipeline in core markets Germany, France, and Poland is on a high level with 12 GW. I will go into more detail on the next slides.

On slide 8, you can see our project pipeline onshore wind, which was stable compared to end of 2025 at 14.6 GW. Our home and core market Germany, which accounts for more than 40% of our project pipeline, remained strong with 6 GW.

As mentioned earlier, we sold 3 wind farms with a total capacity of 39.6 MW, including Bokel with 25.2 MW. 1 wind farm with 18 MW was completed for IPP, and 1 with 34 MW for third parties.

In addition, 4 wind farms with 59 MW were under construction in Germany, plus another 4 wind farms with 59.2 MW for third parties. We received new permits here for 5 wind farms with 186 MW in total.

With respect to our core market France, we see a stable project pipeline with 1.5 GW, and we sold a wind farm with 10.8 MW. With the transfer of the project to JP Energie Environnement, we now completed our second project sale in France with the partner.

Located in the Hauts-de-France region in northern France, the wind farm was developed by PNE France and advanced to ready-to-build status. Effective value engineering has made it possible to significantly increase the height of the wind turbines and electricity generation.

Under a project development agreement, PNE France will continue to support the buyer with selected development activities following the closing of the transaction. Regarding our core market Poland, we also sold 1 wind farm project to a global player in the energy transition.

The wind farm consists of 10 wind turbines with a total installed capacity of 72 MW. We will further develop this project to the ready-to-build stage, which is scheduled for 2029, with the commissioning planned for 2030.

Coming to slide 9, we see that our PV pipeline was stable as well at 7.1 GW peak. Our development activity is continuing to show good progress from projects to the later project phases, resulting in a 26% growth of Phase 3 projects to 1,059 MW peak, coming from 842 MW peak at the end of 2025.

We successfully sold a 40.8 MW peak PV project to Poland's leading energy utility, ORLEN. The project stands out due to its strategic location and technical configuration.

The PV farm will be connected directly to the internal power grid of the Płock refinery. This behind-the-meter approach offers significant advantages.

By not using the general grid, it reduces regulatory risks and simplifies administrative procedures during development and construction. In addition, we received new permits in South Africa with 130 MW peak, in our core market Poland with 81.4 MW peak, in Italy with 29.9, and as well in our core market France with 12.3 MW peak.

If you look at our own IPP portfolio in H2 2026 on slide 10, you see that the megawatt in operation slightly decreased compared to the end of 2025, as we have successfully sold the Bokel wind farm with 25.2 MW in Q1 2026, but added Gnutz Ost with 18 MW in Q2 2026. The total megawatt in operation now amounts to 484 MW at the end of H1 2026.

468 MW are coming from the wind onshore Germany, 11 MW coming from wind onshore France, and 6 MW coming from the wood-fired combined heat and power plant Silbitz. Due to the comparatively higher wind yields, we produced 408 GWh of green energy in the past first half-year of 2026, which is an increase of 11%, and avoided 308 kt of CO2 equivalents.

The hidden reserves accumulated in our portfolio decreased to €153.1 million compared to €159.3 million by the end of 2025, which is partly because they are gradually recognized over the lifetime of these projects and partly because of project sales. More than 90% of our IPP projects are based on feed-in tariffs for 20 years, leading to an average weighted contracted tenor for the IPP portfolio of more than 15 years.

This shows an interesting upside opportunity through short- and medium-term PPAs that are more attractive than the EEG remuneration, and about 40% of our IPP portfolio already have a PPA. Let me also give you some more information about our services business on slide 11, since it continued to perform well and delivers growing high-margin returns through long-running contracts.

Operational management and technical inspections continue to grow. The assets under operational management increased to 3.3 GW, and we had a great customer retention rate for the operational management of above 99%.

After the successful market entrance by the end of 2025, we now have an additional BESS asset under contract, and as well as further contracts under negotiation. Last but not least, we conducted approximately 570 technical inspections in wind farms in the first half of 2026.

The strong performance in wind insights continued with approximately 300 wind assessments and expert opinions in the first half of 2026, and we have conducted approximately 190 LiDAR verifications. With these figures, we are well on the way to matching or even exceeding last year's very good results.

In addition, we had a good performance of our PPA-as-a-service business under the new brand wattxchange, with 24 wind and PV PPA projects and a total output of approximately 243 MW and a transaction volume of around 430 GWh. Also, energy & meteo systems continued to show assets under monitoring of approximately 4.5 GW with a high customer retention rate.

Here, a new German IPP was contracted for monitoring service after a successful trial. Multiple additional one-off performance verification assessments took place during Q2, and the monitoring for a new EU customer has commenced.

We are very happy with the performance of the services segment. With this, I would now like to hand over to Dirk for the financials.

Thank you, Heiko. I also would like to welcome everyone in this call.

Looking at slide 13, you see that revenue grew to €96.8 million, which is an increase of 31% year-over-year. This was mainly driven by increased project sales as well as improved results in the power generation in H1.

Our total output decreased to €123.3 million, which was because fewer projects were built turnkey in H1. This is also reflected in significantly lower cost of materials.

Our EBITDA and EBITDA normalized increased significantly to €27.4 million, compared to €4.7 million in the previous year, especially due to project sales, mainly the wind farm Bokel, and the improved power generation result due to the higher wind yields. The one-time effects of the first quarter of €1.3 million were offset by the end of Q2.

The decrease in the financial result of -€5.1 million was mainly driven by the valuation of interest rate swaps. The negative tax effect was mainly attributable to deferred tax arising in connection with project settlements due to IFRS 15, the capitalization of lease agreements, IFRS 16, and various consolidation entries.

Looking at the segments on slide 14, I would like to mention that previous year's figures were adjusted due to changes in the segment reporting. The consolidation now includes all group consolidations as well as general overhead costs that could not be reliably allocated to operational segments.

Consolidation was therefore renamed to corporate functions and consolidation. Having said that, we see growth in power generation and services, but a decreasing output in project development in the first quarter 2026.

In the project development segment, revenues increased by 36% due to the increase in project sales. Total output, however, decreased to €85.7 million compared to €149.6 million in the previous year due to lower construction activities.

Thus, EBITDA of the segment project development decreased to -€4.1 million from €8.8 million in the previous year. Total output of the segment power generation increased to €49.6 million compared to €40.2 million in the previous year.

Due to comparatively higher wind yields and improved prices, EBITDA in the segment power generation improved in the first half 2026 by 17% to €34.1 million. Total output of the segment services increased to €20 million compared to €17.9 million in the previous year, driven by a strong order book.

EBITDA-wise, the services segment contributed €4.3 million, which is increased by 16%. Regarding the consolidation, eliminations of intragroup profits in the first half of 2026 were significantly lower than in the corresponding period, mainly due to more external sales and less intragroup construction activities, and thus led to an improved result.

Balance sheet: On the asset side, we see on slide 15 that most is allocated to property, plant, and equipment as well as inventories, what we see as investments in stable values and recurring cash flows. Our cash position fell to €56.9 million due to investments in project development, but is still on a good level.

Equity decreased to €131.4 million, reflecting the negative net income. The equity ratio was 11.6%.

However, we continue to aim for an equity ratio of 20% on or more in the mid-term, and already expect a clear improvement in 2026. Adjusted for hidden reserves, the equity ratio was at a comfortable 22.2%.

Liabilities to banks remained stable, resulting in a net debt of €723.5 million. In addition, it is worth mentioning that the majority of the bank liabilities are non-recourse project financing.

To further optimize our maturity profile, we issued a 2026/2031 corporate bond in the first half of 2026 with a volume of €36 million, thereby taking early steps to extend our maturity profile and to partially redeem the corporate bond maturing in mid-2027 with a former face value of €65 million. Whilst existing investors showed considerable interest, there was also a noticeable degree of caution amongst new investors, which is not primarily attributable to PNE itself, but is closely linked to the challenging environment in the renewable energy sector.

We continue to examine various options for strengthening our capital base. This includes considering possible capital measures, including debt financing.

A final decision on this matter has not yet been taken. With that, I would like to hand back to Heiko for the outlook.

Thank you, Dirk. Ladies and gentlemen, this leads me to the outlook on slide 17.

Like the rest of the industry, we have been navigating difficult waters so far in 2026. We are aware of the challenges which still have to overcome.

Nonetheless, we confirm our guidance for the 2026 financial year of EBITDA normalized between €110 to €140 million. Regarding our operating business, we aim to sell further projects in the second half of the year.

At the end of July, we have already completed the sale of 2 further projects in Germany with a capacity of 45 MW. The expansion of our IPP portfolio will be consolidated this year before we further build it up in mid-term.

According to our stronger focus on selected core markets, exit for Turkey and Canada are targeted for 2026. With our focus and deliver transformation and cost reduction program, we remain firmly on track.

In the first half of 2026, however, these cost positions still include program-related expenses associated with the implementation of the transformation measures. As we continue to execute the program, we expect further efficiency gains over the coming quarters.

As already mentioned last time, we now focus even more on projects and solutions with high system and grid compatibility, such as BESS applications, to meet upcoming German legislation. Coming to the end of my presentation, I would like to emphasize again: we are committed to future-proof sustainable growth and value creation.

With this, I would like to conclude our presentation and open the call for questions.

Good morning, Heiko. Good morning, Dirk.

Thanks for presenting the H1 results. My first question is regarding the new EEG.

The German cabinet has pushed it through, and as far as I understand, it doesn't look very promising. Perhaps you could elaborate on your impressions on the new EEG and how this affects your business.

Thank you, Karsten, for your question. In fact, this is, of course, something we very closely monitor, and in general, actually, it's not just about the EEG amendment, and as well on the grid package which is accompanied to that.

There are some aspects which are leading in the right direction. For instance, if you look at the additional volume of 12 GW that are planned to increase the auction volume until 2030.

There's a higher volume, and this should be a positive signal to the industry. However, what we still see, and this is mainly related to the grid package, what was formerly called Redispatch-Vorbehalt has now a different name.

It is now capacity constraints bottleneck areas. There we really see issues which have to be resolved in the ongoing process in the parliament.

Because we, of course, have projects which are not just on those areas, we're not just completely hit. On the other hand, there are unclear and not very very straightforward stipulations which are not very clear how this will result in the business case.

For instance, how to deal with the 5% restricted areas, what is the average looking backward 1 year or 5 years of this constraints. They are clearly topics which still need to be addressed.

The same is on limitations on the overall capacity, which could result in redesigning wind projects and wind turbines and which cannot be done that fast. There must be another deadline, for instance.

Overall, I think from our side, where we supported this in the associations where we are active in, there have been many many proposals, and we count on the parliament, as well on the federal states, because you have to remember that all 16 federal states have objection on the Redispatch-Vorbehalt, on this capacity constraint measures for wind and PV farms. It's our understanding that the cabinet, at the end of the day, has to react on that.

We are still closely on it. Of course, we are in the areas where we are active, we are promoting this.

Overall, one can say there's some positive parts in the amendment, but we are not overly happy with that. Looking at the grid package, we fortunately not only having projects which are in this grid constraints areas, but in other areas.

It will not completely hit us. However, it needs better regulation to, at the end of today, meet the 12 GW additional 12 GW that are now on the table, because otherwise you have a higher volume, but it's not feasible to invest in projects to meet that volume.

I hope that answers your question.

That is of great help. Thanks for elaborating on this.

One follow-up to it: have you a rough idea how much of your German pipeline could be affected by the capacity-limited areas or so-called Redispatch-Vorbehalt?

We have an idea, but to be clear, it's hard to say today. As I said, they are not very clear stipulations currently in there.

What will really be the trigger point to take judge on 5% of curtailment measures within 1 year, what is the exact area, that's not fixed. As long as this is not fixed, it's not very clear to be answered.

All I can say is that, based on the maps that we have currently, we will not be affected that much. However, if you don't have clear regulations, it's hard to really judge on it.

Fully understood. Let's wait until the Bundestag pushes through the law and see what the outcome will be.

I have another question for Dirk. I was a bit puzzled regarding your depreciation, which were much lower in Q2 compared to Q1 if I saw it right.

Perhaps you could elaborate on that.

There is actually one impact, that is from the sale of the project Bokel, that obviously also then has an impact on overall depreciation.

All right, thanks for that, and thanks for taking my questions.

You're welcome. Thanks.

Good morning, everyone. I have only few further questions.

Once again about depreciation, it was very low in the second quarter comparing to first quarter, and I see no special effects in the first quarter. I think that the sale of Bokel is not enough to explain this.

Are there any other effects?

Obviously, there are some other effects like the maturity of assets and other things. We need to have a look in more detail, and we'll come back to this.

Fine. Another question in this area.

Receivables amounting to €3.5 million were written off. What are the circumstances behind it?

There was an arbitration result in Sweden that actually affected one of our receivables, and so we lost the case, to say, and actually needed to adjust.

Fine. I think to meet your guidance, it is likely that further sales from the portfolio will be necessary this year.

To what extent approximately are disposals of existing wind farms planned?

Yeah. Oh, Holger, that's correct.

We plan, as I mentioned, further sales of the projects, and that includes some projects from the existing wind farms. That's why I mentioned in the outlook that we are consolidating this year whilst building the IPP portfolio up in the mid-term.

Your observation is correct. Maybe

can you give us an idea about the amount of disposals from your portfolio?

It will be a couple of projects, 2 or 3, we will see, but in that area.

Fine. Thank you for this information.

The sale of the wind farms from the portfolio in the first half of the year generated a deconsolidation gain of €2.3 million. Perhaps you could explain this figure in a little more detail and provide an outlook on what deconsolidation gains might be achievable from the sale of further wind farms from the portfolio, because I think it's important for your guidance.

In more general to the deconsolidation gains, this situation in 2026 compared to 2025 is slightly different, because this year we are actually having more external sales compared to last year. Yes, so as when we are constructing projects and handing them over to IPP, there is a negative consolidation impact related to this, whereas when we are selling projects to externals, then obviously there is no adjustment in deconsolidation, and hence the deconsolidation result is obviously much better.

As far as I understood, these €2.3 million are the separate deconsolidation gain of Bokel. I read your report, and that seemed to be low to me.

I ask if you could explain this special figure.

Actually, this impact is not just related to Bokel, but is actually an impact from previous year included in there as well. Actually, it's a net amount overall.

Okay. Great, and my last question is about your PV pipeline in Germany.

I think projects in Phase 2 and 3 were reduced by a total of 58 MW peak in the second quarter. Perhaps you could provide us with a brief explanation of this.

Yes, Holger. That's correct.

As the PV market in Germany has mainly its future not only stand-alone, but hybrid projects compared with batteries, and as we constantly monitor the quality of projects that can really succeed, we have identified that amount that we don't see able to succeed or to be profitable enough. That's the reason behind.

I understand. Great.

Thank you very much for taking my questions.

You're welcome.

Good morning, gentlemen. Two questions, please.

Maybe we do it one by one. The first one would be on PPAs.

You mentioned the PPAs and the relevance of PPAs for your company in your presentation, and now again on the new EEG. It looks like under this new regime it is possible to opt out of the CFD, which is to come, once.

My question is: can you imagine that the market will split into sort of two segments, one CFD-covered segment with low financing costs, banks will still appreciate the state guarantees, but also low returns, and the other one then with PPAs only, higher funding costs, but also higher returns? The question is: do you expect the PPA market to rather expand from next year onwards, under the new regime, or to rather decline?

Thanks for your question, Guido. The new law is not yet cast in stone.

There are quite some discussions that especially having direct PPAs, because the industry is really lacking and actually longing for direct contracts, that this shall be included, and we see at least signals that this could go into this direction. I think, yes, your observation is correct.

EEG will remain, and you can opt out. It depends secondly on the auction level that we currently will see from our point of view, because if it will be on a very low level, there are more options that you at the end of the day really go out in a PPA at a certain stage.

The PPA market there will remain, and if you have projects where you can have a kind of a financing with this rather shorter PPA cycles compared to the EEG tariff, then the PPA market still has, let's say, reason for existence and can be profitable. Let's say, we are on one hand confident that there are a bit more possibilities in the upcoming EEG, and we see, on the level that we are currently seeing on the auction prices, possibilities to boost projects that are going in with a lower tariff and then switching later on into a PPA with a higher return in the projects.

It's both, I would say.

Thank you. Sort of connected to that, the second question.

In the May tender, I think you were awarded for two projects, I think one in Brandenburg and one in Lower Saxony, at about 5.1 cents per kilowatt hour. Obviously a relatively low price.

We have already discussed that countermeasures are necessary to develop such projects profitably under these terms. Maybe based on these two cases, can you describe what you're doing differently now to ensure their success?

I'm thinking of renegotiating lease terms, maybe also renegotiating with turbine manufacturers. Maybe on these two examples, yeah, it would be interesting to see what is changing, what you are doing differently now that you have to live with this 5.1 cents.

Thanks. It's, of course, a very low level compared to the recent years.

What we are doing mainly in order to still be successful in those tenders is that one is a certain goal that we internally have is really only the best projects will survive, and the question is how we do this. We do, and this is really a team and even department following this, we do consequently value engineering in the project.

We early on really turn each stone of the whole business case coming from development, CAPEX, and the OPEX side. That includes some of the points that you have mentioned in order to not just renegotiate, yes, this is one element, but really improve at the end of the day the output in terms of turbine choice, in terms of setting up and micrositing.

There are many, many elements. The main point is you have to do this very early on, which we are doing in our stage-gate process.

With that, we are confident that we still can participate with profitable projects on that low level. However, of course, the level is very low, and there's a lot of pressure in all these elements, especially on the CAPEX side, when talking to all the stakeholders involved.

All right. Very clear.

Thank you, Heiko.

Thank you.

Thank you. If there are no further questions, we would like to thank you for your participation in today's webcast.

We look forward to welcoming you next time, maybe at our next webcast on the publication of our quarterly statement for Q3 2026, which is scheduled for the 12th of November 2026. Have a great day.

Bye-bye.