Thank you, Tina, and good afternoon, everyone. Yesterday, we issued our earnings release and presentation, which is available on the Investor Relations page of our website, beaconfinancialcorporation.com, and has been filed with the SEC.

This afternoon's call will be hosted by Paul Perrault and Carl Carlson. During the question-and-answer session, they will also be joined by Mark Meiklejohn, the Chief Credit Officer.

This call may contain forward-looking statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, and business of Beacon Financial Corporation. Please refer to page 2 of our earnings presentation for our forward-looking statements disclosure.

Also, please refer to our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which contain risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements. Any references made during this presentation to non-GAAP measures are only made to assist you in understanding Beacon Financial's results and performance trends, and should not be relied on as financial measures of actual results or future predictions.

For a comparison and reconciliation to GAAP earnings, please see our earnings release. At this time, I'm pleased to introduce Beacon Financial's President and Chief Executive Officer, Paul Perrault.

Thanks, Dario, and good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us for our first quarter earnings call. I'm pleased to share that we achieved a major milestone in our integration process in the first quarter with the successful completion of a core systems conversion in mid-February.

I would like to recognize the hard work and dedication of our teams in executing on this very critical step, and just as importantly, their efforts to achieve strong client retention throughout that process. That outcome reflects months of preparation, disciplined execution, and a continued focus on serving clients during a period of significant change.

From a financial perspective, I am very disappointed with our first quarter results. Loan growth and the margin fell far short of our expectations and reflects some near-term pressures, uncertainty in the economic environment, and the tail end of merger activity.

GAAP earnings for the first quarter were 55 cents per share and operating earnings were 70 cents per share, excluding merger-related charges. While operating results were below both of our prior quarter and our expectations, the core returns remained good with operating ROA just over 1% and operating return on tangible common equity of 11 and 1/4%.

As we discussed coming out of the fourth quarter, the operating environment during the first quarter remained quite challenging. Balance sheet contraction, margin pressure from declining rates, and lower fee income all weighed on our results.

Importantly, several of these headwinds are not structural in nature. They were influenced by seasonal dynamics, timing, and the uncertainty created in economic environment from persistent inflation, extremely thin pricing, global events, and the prospect of rent control legislation in our major markets.

Collectively, these headwinds impacted loan volumes. While the pipelines remained strong, clients are cautious, yet optimistic as the economic environment remains quite fluid.

On the positive side, we continue to make progress on the strategic priorities we laid out at the time of the merger. Expense discipline remains strong.

Core funding costs improved sequentially. Capital levels are robust with CET1 at 11% and tangible common equity at just over 9%.

While credit metrics moved modestly higher during the quarter, they remained manageable and well-reserved, reflecting proactive credit management in a still uncertain environment. Now that the systems conversion is behind us and merger charges are largely complete, our focus shifts squarely to execution, stabilizing the balance sheet, restoring growth momentum, and fully capturing the revenue and efficiency benefits we outlined when we announced the merger.

We believe the pieces are now in place to close the gap between current performance and our planned runway as we move through the remainder of the year. Before I turn it over to Carl, I'll note that our board approved a quarterly dividend of 32 and 1/4 cents per share, consistent with our commitment to returning capital to stockholders.

In addition, the board authorized a $50 million stock repurchase program, subject to regulatory approval, reflecting our confidence in the franchise, our capital strength, and long-term value creation opportunity that we see ahead. I will now turn it over to Carl to walk us through the financial results in some more detail.

Carl?

Thank you, Paul. I'll begin with a high-level summary of the quarter and then walk through the income statement, balance sheet, and credit trends in more detail.

First quarter operating results declined sequentially, driven primarily by balance sheet contraction, modest net interest margin pressure tied to the rate environment, and lower non-interest income. GAAP earnings totaled $46.2 million or 55 cents per share.

Operating earnings were $58.4 million or 70 cents per share, which excludes $13 million of one-time pretax merger-related charges. Operating return metrics remained healthy.

Operating ROA was 1.01% and operating return on tangible common equity was 11.24%, reflecting continued expense discipline and solid core profitability even with lower revenues. Turning to the income statement in more detail, net interest income was $190.8 million, down $8.9 million or 4% from the fourth quarter.

This decline was driven by lower average earning assets and a modest reduction in asset yields as rates moved lower in late 2025. The net interest margin declined by 4 basis points to 3.78%.

Importantly, funding costs improved sequentially. Interest-bearing deposit costs declined 17 basis points, and we expect continued improvement as pricing actions taken continue to flow through.

As balance sheet growth resumes, we believe this positions the margin more favorably looking ahead. Non-interest income totaled $23.9 million, down $2 million or 8% from the prior quarter.

The decline was primarily driven by lower deposit fees and reduced gains on loan sales as SBA activity moderated from a very strong fourth quarter. These declines were partially offset by higher mark-to-market income on derivatives, tax credit investment income, and relatively stable wealth management fees.

On the expense side, operating costs remained well controlled. Total non-interest expense was essentially flat compared to the fourth quarter and came in nearly $1 million below budget.

This performance reflects disciplined cost management and continued execution against merger synergies, offset modestly by seasonal increases in occupancy costs and a true-up in FDIC insurance. Excluding merger charges, the operating efficiency ratio for the quarter was 59.5%, underscoring the underlying expense discipline in the business.

Now turning to the balance sheet, total assets declined $992 million to $22.2 billion, driven primarily by lower cash balances associated with point-in-time payroll fulfillment deposits. Loans declined approximately 1%, reflecting continued runoff in the commercial real estate and consumer portfolios, partially offset by growth in core commercial lending.

Loan originations and draws were $734 million with a weighted average coupon of 628 basis points. 67% of originations were floating rate.

Deposits declined 6%, driven largely by payroll deposits and brokered balances. Excluding payroll and brokered deposits, core customer deposits declined approximately 2%, reflecting typical seasonal outflows related to tax payments and commercial activity.

Turning to credit, credit metrics deteriorated modestly during the quarter. Non-performing loans increased to 83 basis points of total loans, driven primarily by migration of Boston office exposure and several rent-controlled multifamily properties in New York City.

Net charge-offs totaled $13.6 million or 30 basis points annualized, reflecting resolutions of a small number of larger credits. The allowance for loan losses closed the quarter at $244 million, representing 1.36% of loans.

Given portfolio composition and current risk trends, we believe reserve coverage remains appropriate. Provision expense declined modestly from the prior quarter and we continue to expect provisioning to be less than net charge-offs as we work through existing criticized credits.

Capital generation remains a clear strength. CET1 ended the quarter at 11%, tangible common equity at 9.1%, and tangible book value increased 16 cents to $23.48 per share.

Importantly, with the core systems conversions completed in early February, we have now recognized the final significant merger charges. Total merger costs were in line with expectations, and management is confident the announced cost synergies of the merger have been realized.

Looking ahead, we anticipate improving earnings momentum now that the merger costs and system conversions are completed and announced expense synergies have been realized. We expect loan growth to remain soft in the second quarter, then strengthen throughout the remainder of the year.

We expect the margin to stabilize around 380 basis points and gradually improve. While near-term macro and rate uncertainties remain, we believe the franchise is well positioned to improve performance and close the gap toward targeted run rate over the coming quarters.

That concludes my prepared remarks. Back to Paul.

Thank you, Carl. We will now be joined by Mark Meiklejohn and Michael McCurdy, and we'll open it up for questions.

Hey, good afternoon, everyone.

Hey, Justin.

Just wanted to start out on the margin. Can you just, Carl, maybe provide a little more detail on the reset on accretion expectations, just what changed from the original assumptions that went into that and what got you from 15 down to that $12 million number just on a go-forward basis?

Sure. Thanks for the question and so when we first estimated the purchase accounting, we tried to take out the impact of prepayments and things of that nature.

We were estimating it around $15 million, a lot of the schedules suggested that. We've got these all set up in our systems to track as loans pay down and it's coming in a little bit lower.

We're not seeing any kind of prepayment activity at this point that's meaningful to the amounts. For this quarter it came in at $12.1 million.

I believe it was over $13 million last quarter. I'm feeling more confident that the $12 million range is something now that the systems conversions have taken place.

We had two general ledger conversions and all the systems conversions onto a new system. I feel more confident that this will be the number going forward.

Understood. Just I guess some of the moving pieces there, if I look at the average balance sheet and just loan yields, what they did for the quarter, that 5.96% was down over 30 basis points.

You pointed it out, but without a huge, huge swing in accretion income, and I know we had lower rates filtering through, but seemed like a big move, I was just curious if there's anything else underneath the surface there that just drove that yield down for the quarter?

As you mentioned, the purchase accounting did come down in the quarter from 13.8 to 12.2. That was $1.6 million of the impact, which was about 7 basis points.

On the other side, it's just the movements last quarter or the fourth quarter in rates, 75 basis points basically moved by the Fed. We saw that throughout the quarter really impact Q1 as you see the full impact in the quarter.

You still have some loans that are reprice every 3 months and things of that nature coming in and repricing down as well. I'd say we're not particularly surprised by where the yields came in when you exclude the purchase accounting impact.

What didn't help us here is we expect a little bit more loan growth and at more current yields. We're originating loans in the 6.20s right now and so that you're not getting that lift from new originations as much.

Okay. Then just one other one sticking with the margin.

You just flush out a little more just your thoughts on deposit costs from here. We've heard from a lot of your competitors that we're at a point where there could now perhaps be some upward pressure on funding, just given competition and with rate cuts off the table for the time being.

Sounds like instead there's some more room to go lower there, just was wondering what factored into that and just what repricing may be left on the book?

Sure. Again, we're going into a systems conversion and we probably lagging our deposit costs on moving down our non-maturity deposit costs a bit, I think we'll see the benefits of that more so in the second quarter and into the third quarter.

That's where we are on that. We probably could've done a little bit more, but going into a systems conversion, it didn't make a lot of sense to be moving rates at that point.

On the non-maturity deposits, we see opportunity there. The CD book, it's roughly $1.4 billion, $1.5 billion that will be repricing.

I don't see tremendous opportunity there. I think there'd be some opportunity, 10, 20, maybe even 30 basis points there, but the competition's pretty tough, we've got to be competitive in the market.

On the rest of the funding book, the Federal Home Loan Bank advances and brokered deposits, we're basically at market at this point, not a lot of benefit on that side. Things are kind of rolling into current at rates that are current rates now.

The margin gain's going to be with better loan production in that environment. That's the better lever that I can see as I look a few months down the road.

Great. I will leave it there.

Appreciate it.

Yep, okay.

Hi, David.

Quick question, Paul, Carl. In terms of the investor CRE, appreciate the slide in the back there.

Looks like a slug of that is coming up for maturing or repricing. Just curious in terms of the risk you point out there, is that more of a debt service coverage risk or refinance risk or both?

I was just curious where you see maybe some of that.

I didn't catch the preface, David. I couldn't clearly hear what the preface was.

What is it that you're asking about?

On the investor CRE portfolio that's coming up for maturity here in the next couple quarters, I think in the slide deck you mentioned some risk factors there. Just curious if that's more pertinent in terms of debt service coverage risk, refinance risk, or a combination of both?

Where you see the risk in that book? Thanks.

Mark will answer that.

Yes, I'll take that. There's a fair amount coming up over the next 4 quarters.

As we look forward through it, I was taking a look at it the other day, and there's one substandard loan in that portfolio. It's one that is a property that's being redeveloped.

We expect that to work itself out, and there are two smaller criticized loans. The rest of that is a pass book.

I think we feel pretty good both with maturity and repricing as we move through those maturities, whether they're hard maturities or pricing maturities.

Got it. Then I noticed just the linked-quarter trends, the loans 90 days past due seemed to have declined the same amount nonaccruals went up.

Was it the right way to read into it that they just sort of migrated to nonaccrual from past due?

I think that's fair to say.

Got it. Then just one follow-up in terms of, Paul, the board approval for the buyback there.

Any color or indication when you might be getting regulatory approval? I don't know if there's any sort of a timeframe you feel comfortable with.

There is a little timeframe, but I never try to predict exactly what the Federal Reserve is going to do, but we expect it to happen reasonably quickly. Within the month.

Got it. Thank you.

there's nobody in line, maybe it's only a few days. Who's up next?

Hey, good afternoon, guys.

Hi, Carl.

Just maybe to get ahead of ourselves a little bit on the regulatory approval of the buyback, but maybe just high-level thoughts. How do you want us to think about what could go into your decision-making process if you want to go ahead and use it?

I know you have the CRE issue or concentration, but you also have lots of capital. Maybe can you frame up a little bit?

We're actually pretty far ahead on the real estate piece of it for the leverage of concentration, we've created an opportunity to do these kinds of things with that. Go ahead, Carl, any other factors?

No, I think we still remain committed to hit that 300%. The board is certainly behind that and wants us to hit that and stay on target.

As capital continues to grow and the size of the balance sheet, I think we're in good shape to be able to continue to move forward with at least this initial authorization.

Okay. Good.

Let me just try it one more time, I guess. If you feel like you're on pace to get under the 300 by the end of '27, you're comfortable using a little bit of the buyback.

Is that a fair way to think about it?

Particularly when you couple it with the current shrinking of the balance sheet with originations being way off from what we're used to and payoffs still coming in. When you look at the current environment, the idea of a buyback seems to fit in very nicely.

Great. I appreciate that.

I know it's a topic for investors, so. Then I guess on a follow-up question here for you guys, both of you used the term close the gap, and I was wondering if you can help us understand what gives you the confidence that some of the macro or environmental headwinds you guys saw this quarter are starting to fade?

Then as you get one quarter past the conversion, what kind of tailwinds do you see at the core then from not having to spend the time and energy and focus on getting that right?

I expect people to move from making sure we have customer retention and problem-solving, you always have those things associated with a massive conversion like this, and we're at the point now where I think of it as like you built a new home and when you move in, there's a punch list of things that need to get done, and that's kind of where we are. I'm expecting that our bankers and support personnel will now continue to shift toward loan production and fee income production, which will sort of get us on the right track to where we had hoped we would be.

Carl, you want to add anything? No,

I think and just the uncertainty in the market. We feel good about our loan pipelines.

We feel good about what's going on out there, but we know they could be better. There's just a lot of uncertainty in the market when late February and then we've got the geopolitical things that are going on.

Then also we've seen interest rates increase, particularly the yield curve steepened, which sets people back, even if it's momentarily. We also have the multifamily proposals for rent control in the Boston market, which has a lot of folks putting things on a wait-and-see mode.

In Rhode Island.

Rhode Island was passed in Providence, right. There's a number of things that we think will get resolved sooner rather than later or hope to get resolved sooner rather than later, that takes some of that uncertainty off the table and move things forward.

Yeah. All right,

thank you both.

Carl.

Good afternoon.

Hey.

Hey, Paul. Carl, I'll just circle back to the margin here in terms of just thinking about the day count here.

You do have, looks like a 5, 6 basis points drag or increased potential in the upcoming quarter on the margin. Just curious maybe if you could be a little bit over the 380 number for the second quarter here?

Anything's possible. Or

further into the third, if we put it that way.

I Yeah, day day counts always come into play here in a number of As far as I I'm less concerned about the margin number and more more concerned with the the actual net interest income that we earn. Just to give you a little sense around that, payroll deposits are something that drags us on the margin, right?

We we have we we get we have average payroll deposits and that are substantial. In the first quarter, they were about a $1.2 billion in average balances.

Now they're highly volatile during the week. Depending on what day of the week we close on for for the quarter, that's kind of the the ending balance of those those balances.

That's $1.2 billion and usually the first quarter and and trust me, I'm just learning all this, usually the first quarter is the highest quarter for for average balances. That's because of taxes and other things that that go through that.

That's just follow and that's it's a little bit more than $200 it was $200 million more than the fourth quarter. We expect that to drop, the average balance in Q2 will be lower and it'll be lower still, I think, in Q3, and then bounce back in Q4.

That's that's that's a those balances we we have a very very little spread on, right? That's a that's mostly a fee income business and the the the margins around that maybe around 35, 40 basis points.

That's something that you want to keep keep in mind that as those balances move, it could move the margin overall.

As Carl is learning about the payroll business, it's not because he's not doing his job, it's because it was a legacy Berkshire business that they have been in for some time. It is quite volatile.

I look at it daily and it goes, I think the lowest I've seen is about $600 million in deposits to a little over $2 billion in deposits. We don't employ it as we do our other sources of funding.

Yep. On the commercial side, you look at the CRE loans and the C&I loans, those are actual day basis loans.

The others are 30/360. We'll get a pick up, there's an extra day next quarter that we get.

I'll let you guys figure out how you want to calculate the margin. I see it get calculated lots of different ways.

100% on that. That's fair enough.

Then I guess the second thing here for me, just in terms of credit and the provision and charge-off guidance. Provision to exceed charge-offs, kind of how are you thinking about the level of charge-offs for the remainder of the year?

I think we provided some guidance on the provision. I think those are good numbers, probably trending a little bit towards the high end of that guidance.

Charge-offs, I expect to exceed the provision, and that's as a result of the aggressive reserving that we have in place and the credit marks that we have in place. As an example, we have about $80 million on our substandard portfolio and net of substandard, we're at about 91 basis points coverage.

I think what we'll be doing is those charge-offs will effectively be funded out of that reserve, and so I expect provision will run lower than charge-offs.

Pretty substantial charge-offs then as the year goes on?

That's hard to say. It depends on how we resolve some of these loans.

I'll say they'll be in excess of provision.

Okay. Fair enough.

Then just sticking with credit for the moment here, in terms of the office loan that went to nonaccrual here and the multifamily, maybe just kind of color around the LTVs and kind of debt service coverage ratios for those properties and timing on resolution?

I'll start with the larger loan, which is the office property. That is a downtown Boston property.

It's a larger loan. We have a participant in that deal.

Our share of that deal is around $17 million and change. There's about 50% occupancy, about a 0.7 debt service coverage.

On that particular loan, we are working with the sponsor on a potential sale of that property, and between specific reserves and then customer reserves that we hold against the loan, we've got about 40% coverage on that loan. I think we feel pretty good, even though it's a somewhat new nonaccrual, I think we feel like we're in a pretty good place from a reserving perspective, and we'll be able to work with the borrower through that.

As far as the rent control, I just wanted to make a comment on New York rent control. I think this came up last quarter, but there we only have seven rent control properties in New York.

It's a total of $18 million, so that represents the entire portfolio. This was two particular loans.

They are related to each other. They total $9 million.

I don't have the statistics on those loans, loan-to-value, debt service coverage, but again, I will say that we're about 40% coverage on a reserve basis and we're potentially looking at selling either the notes or the loans near term.

Great. Appreciate that color there.

Maybe just on the loan growth outlook for the second quarter in the pipeline here, just kind of maybe wrestling a little bit with the flattish comments for the upcoming quarter. Is there just maybe more CRE runoff at the end of the day than you guys expected that kind of drives that versus the pipeline, or are they kind of equally driving maybe?

It might be equal, but it's the distraction and it's the internal focus that everybody's had now for a number of months, coupled with more prepayments than we expected, coupled with customers and prospects aren't moving as quickly as we might have thought on purchases or activity that would cause loan drawdowns, if you will. To get that cranking again, it's going to take a little while.

We're on it. I think it'll happen.

How quickly and how deeply, I would be speculating, but we're all knowing what we need to do to get there.

Great. That's everything for me at the moment.

Appreciate all the color. Thanks.

That's fine.

Hi, good afternoon.

Hello, Laurie.

Just to stay with credit here, just and I really appreciate the details on slide 16. The $192 million criticized office, how much of that is coming due this year and next year?

Are there any lumps, any color you can give us? Obviously, you referenced some maturing, I just didn't know the amounts.

I'll go cover it again for you, Laurie, but the answer would be the same as the previous. I have the next 4 quarters in front of me, and in terms of criticized and classified, the total is about $55 million.

$20 million of that is substandard. Again, I mentioned earlier, that's a property that is being redeveloped for a major retail tenant.

That's a relatively new event, a new happening, I think that's going to help us with some sort of a favorable resolution there. The other two loans are both special mention and they have very strong sponsors.

I don't expect any issues with those. One is $18 million maturing in the third quarter and the other is $17 million maturing in the first quarter of '27.

That represents the total of criticized or classified loans.

In office.

I'm sorry, just to clarify, the $18 million and the $17 million, those are office?

Correct.

Okay. Great.

How much office charge-offs were there this quarter? It was,

I think it's in the deck, but there was a single charge-off for just under $7 million and that represented the resolution of a downtown office property that we've had in nonaccrual for some time. We took the charge-off in the first quarter, that loan will actually resolve in the second quarter.

The deal's been inked, we're just waiting for it to close, but we went ahead and took the charge on that.

I'm so sorry, what is the total balance of that loan?

$23 million.

$23 million. Okay.

Great. All of your CRE charge-offs this quarter were office.

Okay. Then

It was a single loan, Laurie, just to be clear, it was one single loan.

One single loan, right. Yeah.

Great. Then your C&I charge-offs of $6.6 million, I'm thinking is that the discontinued, the Specialty Vehicles or the Eastern Funding, or can you help us think about what that is and what the nonperformers are on those two categories?

Sure. That was split pretty evenly between SBA and Eastern Funding.

In the case of Eastern Funding, it was a charge-down of a a loan that's been a long-term workout. In the in the case of the SBA, it was, well, it was just an SBA charge-off.

In terms of the non nonperforming balances, Vehicle is at $3.9 million, Macrolease is at $5.5 million. That's down pretty significantly from prior quarter.

We did have a we had a resolution of an $11 million loan. It was that Orangetheory franchise that we had talked about last quarter, I believe.

That was resolved itself and I expect will be back accruing within the current quarter. I'm sorry, it is accruing already.

It'll be upgraded within the current quarter. Then you didn't ask, but Firestone is is a little under $1 million.

Oh, that's great. Okay.

That's great. Great.

Then just one last question for me, I guess, Carl, this is to you. Your final one-time charges of $13 million, a little bit higher than the $10 million you had expected.

Can you just help us think about what were the differences there? Thanks so much.

Sure. On the compensation side, those those numbers came in a little bit higher.

Accounting and tax came in a little bit higher. Some of the contract terminations came in a little higher than I expected for the month for for the for the quarter.

Overall, we came in on top of what we originally announced of $93 million. That was our original estimate when we announced the transaction.

We came on, basically right on top of that number. In different buckets than we thought, but the the IT folks did a great job of negotiating and executing on on a lot of the contracts and the conversion costs, which which helped pay for some of the things that went over.

At the end of the day, came in right on top of the original $93 million. Merger charges are over now.

They're they're done. Basically everybody knows that, we we we did a great job of getting getting around that and and controlling that cost.

Now if if anything sneaks through, it's it's not going to be a merger charge, it'll just go in the operating run rate.

Perfect. Thanks so much.

Laurie.

Hey, good afternoon. I just want to circle back on the NIM a little bit because it's pretty important with what the stock's doing today.

I just want to clarify the kind of language of the 5.80% stabilized NIM or the 3.80%, sorry. Are you thinking about that for the second quarter and then build from there, or is 3.80% kind of the full '26 average NIM in your thoughts?

I really like the 5.80% you threw out there. I just wish

Sorry about that.

We feel pretty good about the 3.80% for Q2 and feel that we'll be building on that. Again, it's dependent on loan growth.

That really drives a lot of this. I think the second quarter will be more about the funding side as well as loan growth, but I expect that we'll get the funding where it needs to be, the funding rates down to where they're supposed to be on some of our deposit products.

Now of course, everything changes in the market, but we've got a little bit of a steeper yield curve, I feel good about how things look going forward. Now if rates drop 25 basis points, just to throw that out there, even though there's no expectation of this right now, if rates happen to drop 25 basis points, that would cost us about $6 $6.6 million, $6.8 million a year in net interest income.

That's a parallel move. I don't think anybody's expecting rates to go up.

We'll see what happens.

A lot of our loan originations are in the 5-year neighborhood and those generations should be helpful as we go forward into the second and third quarter.

Commercial yields, the commercial loan book at around 6.20%, that's probably pretty good for now, so that'll just benefit from the mix as it grows. Then I guess the key is to grow the commercial real estate at 5.74% to get that up to the 6.20% range.

I would add that we're still on track to target getting to 300% leverage of commercial real estate to capital. We're probably ahead of the original schedule and so we've turned the real estate lenders back on because we can easily absorb decent production and still make the targets to get to the 300% in plenty of time.

That's all good news on loan production.

Then Okay.

No,

I just wanted to add a little bit of color on the loan origination side of things. As far as the loans that were originated this quarter, the CRE loans, the WAC on those loans were at 6.30%, C&I loans were 6.34%, and consumer loans were coming in at 6.03%.

Just the spot weighted average coupon on those books at commercial real estate at the end of the quarter were 5.57% for CRE, C&I at 6.75%, and consumer loans at 5.01%. You can see we're originating at higher coupons than what's on the book.

Now those coupons, I don't think they include purchase accounting at all, just keep that in mind, that's just the rate on the loan.

Right. Right.

Okay. Then last one, just building off of that, on the bond book, you had a decent lift there.

What is new money going in on the bond portfolio?

That's going in at around 4.29%. I think we purchased about $100 and $130 million during the quarter, duration in about 3 and 1/2, 3 3.8 on that book.

Got it. Thank you.

That's all I had. Appreciate it.

Okay.

Hey, afternoon, guys. Just a couple follow-up questions on the Boston office property that went on NPAs this quarter.

Was that a Class A property or Class B?

It's a B.

Okay. The occupancy rate that you gave out, that 50%, is that kind of indicative of the overall marketplace?

No.

No, I don't think so. I think there's certainly pressure, and occupancy is down.

I think the CBD is about

25%?

I think it's about I was going to say 75% occupancy.

About 25%

in the central business district

tends

to be the number. Yeah.

That's low. Now

how much of that is being unused, but still under good lease, you can speculate on what that may or may not be, but I think we read about some green shoots in leasing that have been happening, not the least of which is JPMorgan moving into the big new building over the South Station area, quite a few floors. They'll introduce some competition maybe.

Got it. How does the rest of your portfolio look?

I'm sure you've taken a deep dive. Are there any concerns in that Boston office portfolio?

We have taken a deep dive. We have about $1.2 billion in office, and only about $200 million is in downtown Boston.

We've talked about two problem loans on the call already, one that we took the charge-off on, and then the new nonaccrual. Those actually are the two largest nonaccruals in our book.

Beyond that, the portfolio is criticized, but we have good reserves and we look very closely at all those loans and we reassess the reserves all the time.

Perfect. Then last question for me, as I think about operating expenses for you guys, what we

Daniel, I think we lost you, but you're asking about operating expenses. I've been getting this question all the time, I'm going to guess what you're asking.

We're certainly on target, if not better than what we originally targeted for an operating cost, and we laid that out in the deck. We feel good about where we are right now going forward.

Are you there, Daniel? Is anybody there?

As long as we didn't lose you.

Thanks, Tina, and thank all of you for joining us today, and we look forward to talking with you next quarter. Have a good day.