Thank you, and welcome to Allegiant Travel Company's fourth quarter and full year 2025 earnings call. We will begin today's call with Greg Anderson, CEO, providing a high-level overview of the quarter, along with an update on our business.

Drew Wells, Chief Commercial Officer, will walk through demand commentary and revenue performance. Finally, Robert Neal, President and Chief Financial Officer, will speak to our financial results and outlook.

Following commentary, we will open it up to questions. We ask that you please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up if needed.

The company's comments today will contain forward-looking statements concerning our future performance and strategic plan. Various risk factors could cause the underlying assumptions of these statements and our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements.

These risk factors and others are more fully disclosed in our filings with the SEC. Any forward-looking statements are based on information available to us today.

We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of future events, new information, or otherwise. The company cautions investors not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which may be based on assumptions and events that do not materialize.

To view this earnings release, as well as the rebroadcast of the call, feel free to visit the company's Investor Relations site at ir.allegiantair.com. With that, I'll turn it to Greg.

Sherry, thank you, and thanks to everyone for joining us today. We closed 2025 with strong momentum, capping a year of meaningful progress that strengthened our foundation and showcased the durability of our model.

Let me briefly review our performance in the fourth quarter, reflect on key achievements from last year, and then frame our strategic focus for 2026. Our financial results for the fourth quarter exceeded our original expectations.

We saw strong leisure demand throughout the quarter, as TRASM declined just 2.6% on 10.5% capacity growth. Fuel ran slightly higher than expected, but disciplined cost execution helped us deliver a 12.9% adjusted operating margin, among the best in the industry.

These results demonstrate the effectiveness of our low-utilization, flexible capacity model. Operationally, 2025 was an outstanding year.

Controllable completion was an impressive 99.9%, even as we increased peak flying. That consistency was recognized externally as well.

The Wall Street Journal ranked Allegiant the second best US airline overall, and number one in lowest cancellation rate, the least number of mishandled bags, and the fewest instances of involuntarily bumping passengers. This reflects the daily professionalism and execution of Team Allegiant.

We also successfully integrated the MAX aircraft into our fleet. After receiving our first MAX in late 2024, we prioritized investing in pilot training and revamping our maintenance operations.

This was to ensure a seamless transition. These aircraft are performing very well, delivering roughly a 20% fuel burn advantage compared to the A320.

Now, we are continuing to optimize schedules to allow us to realize the efficiency and reliability benefits from our MAX fleet. As they continue to increase their share of flying for us, they should become a meaningful tailwind for margins.

Technology modernization was another important milestone. Transitioning away from our proprietary systems in favor of modern, flexible platforms was a major undertaking, but it was essential for achieving our future goals.

We are now turning our focus to leveraging this state-of-the-art technology stack that allows us to introduce new tools and capabilities across the business. Our commercial initiatives are also gaining traction.

Allegiant Extra continues to perform well, loyalty engagement is rising, and our improving digital capabilities are helping to make travel easier and even more enjoyable. With flatish capacity growth in 2026, these commercial levers should boost earnings, as their early results remain encouraging.

Importantly, we strengthened our financial position while advancing all these initiatives. Unit costs fell more than 6% for the year in industry-leading performance.

With the sale of Sunseeker, debt repayments, and improved EBITDA, net leverage was reduced to 2.3 turns, nearing our lowest levels since pre-COVID. Turning briefly to demand, we saw meaningful improvement over the holiday period, and that momentum continued into January.

Current leisure demand is strong, and our customers continue to value convenience and affordability, areas where Allegiant is uniquely positioned. Looking ahead to 2026, we do not plan to grow the fleet this year as a standalone, and we expect to lean into our existing infrastructure and commercial initiatives to drive TRASM improvement and margin expansion.

Importantly, we remain committed to balancing growth with profitability, which we refer to as earning the right to grow. We expect a 13.5% adjusted operating margin in the first quarter, which should be our second straight quarter at or near the industry lead, and setting the stage for a strong 2026.

For the full year, we're guiding to adjusted EPS of more than $8 per share, an increase of approximately 60% year over year, reflecting the structural improvements we've made across the business. Strategically, our agreement to acquire Sun Country is an important step forward, as the combination is expected to accelerate our ability to build the leading leisure airline in the US.

Given the execution over the past year and the strengthening of our foundation, the organization is well positioned to take on this significant undertaking. The two airlines share a strong cultural alignment, similar fleet types, minimal network overlap, and complementary technology platforms, including Navitaire, all of which help reduce integration risk.

A thoughtful integration plan is underway, focusing on capturing synergies efficiently, while protecting operational excellence and the respective strengths of both airlines. When you step back and look at the broader landscape, it's clear that Allegiant continues to separate itself within our segment of the industry.

Our low-utilization, flexible capacity model has worked for more than 20 years because it is purpose-built for leisure flying. We take great pride in being the leisure carrier of choice in nearly all the 126 communities we serve, delivering convenience and reliability that travelers can count on.

None of this is possible without the consistency and dedication of Team Allegiant. Their passion shows up every single day, and I'm honored to work alongside them.

With that, let me turn it over to Drew to walk through our commercial performance.

Thank you, Greg, and thanks, everyone, for joining us this afternoon. We finished 2025 with more than $2.5 billion in total airline revenue, up approximately 4.3% versus full-year 2024, and a record high for Allegiant.

I'd be remiss not to celebrate the success of the growth strategy, even in the face of macroeconomic pressures through the year. On the back of that growth, we believe our year-over-year TRASM change relative to our CASM-ex performance will be the best in the industry for the full year.

The fourth quarter ended with approximately $656 million in total airline revenue, up approximately 7.6% versus 4Q '24, and a fourth quarter record. Finally, the fixed fee revenue contribution of $25.5 million in the fourth quarter, despite the increase of scheduled service utilization, was another quarterly record.

Our unit revenue metrics performed quite well in the fourth quarter, particularly when considering the growth profile. Our scheduled service ASMs grew 10.5% year over year in the fourth quarter, while TRASM decreased 2.6% to 12.67 cents.

As we've discussed over the last couple of quarters, the change in load factor trajectory is helping support the improvement of the growth-adjusted trends in unit revenue metrics, as we gained a full point of load factor in 4Q '25 compared to the prior year. The winter holiday performance was certainly the most striking.

Unit revenues over the Thanksgiving travel window were slightly higher on a year-over-year basis. Unit revenues across the Christmas and New Year's travel period were modestly higher on a year-over-year basis, but also notably shifted into January, providing some tailwinds into the first quarter of 2026.

Remember, the holiday period in 2024 also marked the start of our utilization normalization and continued into 2026. We expect the next year to represent additional sculpting of the significant utilization lift of the last year.

For many markets, that represents capacity somewhere between 2024 and 2025 levels. Peak days will increase utilization just slightly through the first half of the year, while off-peak days will regress slightly more.

We'll maintain some slack in the approach, but as usual, we'll feature more ability to add off-peak day capacity as the environment dictates. Additionally, as Greg alluded to, is the proliferation of MAX flying in our network.

We're thrilled with the performance of the new aircraft in our system thus far. In fact, when cherry-picking the top A320 lines throughout the entire system against all MAX flyers, we are producing approximately 20% better economics, simply measured as revenue per hour less fuel expense per hour, on peak days with similar utilization.

Further, through the same comparison on off-peak days, we produce nearly 10% better per-hour economics while also flying the MAX aircraft 30% more than the same top Airbus tails in the fourth quarter. We continue to be incredibly excited for the increased potential that lies ahead with this aircraft.

The fleet cadence through 2026, of course, correlates neatly with our overall ASM growth expectations. First quarter ASMs are expected to be down approximately 5.7%, and the second quarter slightly more, due both to sweet schedule and the Easter holiday pulling forward.

Growth is expected to ramp up in the third and then further in the fourth quarter to achieve a full-year expectation of down half of 1% versus full-year 2025. 2026 will also mark a return of robust levels of new-market ASMs.

While 1Q remains in the mid-single percent of ASMs flown, approximately 10% of both the second and third quarters will be in their first 12 months of operation. 19 markets begin service in the first quarter, 17 of those this month, and 20 more in the second quarter.

New markets lend themselves to strong lift in new card acquisition trends. Four of the last five months have been double-digit percent higher on a year-over-year basis, and spend remains strong on the card.

We received approximately $140 million in remuneration, which represented a modest year-over-year increase. As we continue to build on this momentum, we are committed to working closely with Bank of America on the evolution of the co-brand, and we are engaged in constructive discussions to ensure long-term alignment and a continued strong partnership that supports the next phase of our card program.

The modest decline in ASMs, holiday shifts pulling noticeable traffic into the quarter, and most importantly, the exceptional demand throughout the month of January sets us up for an incredible 1Q revenue performance. I noted the New Year's shift of travel into 1Q, but the early Easter will have some positive impact to the end of March as well.

Even while winter storm impacts were worth approximately $2 million in absolute revenue headwinds, the TRASM effect is a slight positive due to the timing within the quarter. We were much better positioned within our Navitaire ecosystem to provide options and reaccommodate our passengers.

Most of all, a huge thank you to all of our team members that showed up in adverse conditions and safely made a huge difference in the lives of our travelers. With that, I'd like to hand it over to Robert.

Thank you, Drew, and good afternoon, everyone. I'd like to start by just recognizing the team for their incredible work throughout 2025.

We grew capacity by 12.6% in the year on flat fleet count and flat staffing levels. Despite a 14% increase in fleet utilization and nearly 17% reduction in employees per departure, our team members delivered an industry-leading controllable completion of 99.9%.

Now, I'll walk through the fourth quarter and full-year results, and then provide an update on our outlook and financial position. As with prior calls, my comments today will reference results on an adjusted basis, excluding special items, unless otherwise noted.

Our outlook today will exclude any impact from our proposed acquisition of Sun Country Airlines, which we expect to close in the back half of 2026. For the fourth quarter, the airline segment produced net income of $50.1 million, resulting in airline-only earnings of $2.72 per share, coming in ahead of our guided range, which was $2 per share at the midpoint.

Outperformance was driven by lower-than-expected salaries and benefits, timing of certain maintenance expenses, and a stronger-than-expected revenue environment following the government shutdown. Full-year 2025 consolidated net income was $70.3 million, or $3.80 per share.

The airline earned $93.8 million, yielding full-year airline-only earnings of $5.07 per share. The airline generated just over $143 million of EBITDA during the fourth quarter, producing an EBITDA margin of nearly 22%, underscoring the earnings power of the model in a favorable leisure demand environment.

Turning to costs, fuel averaged $2.61 per gallon during the fourth quarter, slightly above our expectations. Notably, ASMs per gallon were up 2.6% over the prior-year quarter, highlighting initial efficiencies from investments in the MAX aircraft and LEAP engines.

As the MAX aircraft comprises a larger percentage of the fleet, we expect to see continued improvements here, yielding significant savings in annual fuel consumption. Fourth quarter adjusted non-fuel unit costs were 8.01 cents, representing a 3.4% year-over-year improvement on 10.2% higher capacity.

For the full year, cost performance came in consistent with our down mid-single-digit expectations, with non-fuel unit costs down 6.1% despite removal of 4.5 points of planned capacity growth, demonstrating the strength and agility of our flexible utilization model and the cost discipline of our team. We've continued to grow into our infrastructure throughout 2025, and I'm really pleased with how the team has delivered on the cost front.

As we look ahead to 2026, while we expect capacity to be down slightly year over year, which will place modest pressure on CASM-ex, I remain confident that the cost initiatives implemented in 2025 will help mitigate these pressures. Importantly, we continue to expect full-year unit revenue increases to exceed CASM-ex fuel increases, as evidenced by our full-year outlook, which I'll discuss in a moment.

Moving to the balance sheet, we ended the quarter with total available liquidity of $1.1 billion, inclusive of $250 million of undrawn revolving credit facilities. Cash and investments declined by approximately $150 million from the end of the prior quarter, reflecting proactive debt repayments following the sale of Sunseeker, which had closed late in the third quarter.

During the quarter, we repaid $259 million of debt, including $224 million in voluntary prepayments. At year-end, cash and investments sat at approximately 32% of full-year revenues.

We also increased our revolver capacity to $250 million, up from $175 million, providing efficient available liquidity while allowing for a reduction in debt balances. Notably, we continue to maintain an unencumbered pool of aircraft and engines valued at well over $1 billion, providing substantial financial flexibility.

Total debt at year-end was just under $1.8 billion, down from $2.1 billion at the end of the third quarter, and net leverage improved to 2.3 times, down nearly a full turn from the fourth quarter of 2024. Capital expenditures during the fourth quarter were $56.7 million, including $35.9 million of aircraft-related spend and $20.8 million in other expenditures, while deferred heavy maintenance spend during the quarter was $11.5 million.

For the full year, we invested $453 million into the airline, inclusive of heavy maintenance expenditures and within our previously guided range. We ended the year with 123 aircraft in the fleet, including 16 737 MAX and 107 A320 family aircraft.

Looking ahead to 2026, we expect to take delivery of 11 737 MAX aircraft, with nine placed into service by year-end, while retiring nine A320 family aircraft throughout the year, resulting in a flat year-over-year fleet count. Based on these delivery expectations, we estimate full-year 2026 capital expenditures of approximately $750 million, including $85 million in deferred heavy maintenance and $580 million of aircraft-related capex.

Turning to our outlook, as Drew noted, we now expect full-year capacity to be down slightly year over year, largely due to timing of aircraft deliveries, which are back-half weighted. This includes a modest delay of three aircraft, pushing their entry into service just after the start of our summer peak.

The healthy demand environment we observed during the fourth quarter of 2025 extended into early January. While winter storms Fern and Gianna did impact bookings, we are beginning to see a recovery, and today's guidance reflects the impact from the storms.

As a reminder, our outlook is based on Allegiant's standalone forecast. For the first quarter, we expect earnings per share of approximately $3 at the midpoint of our guided range, implying an operating margin of 13.5%, based on an assumed fuel cost of $2.60 per gallon.

For the full year, given continued macro uncertainty across the industry, we believe it is appropriate to guide more conservatively. At this point, we expect to deliver earnings per share of at least $8, with the potential for upside as demand trends, cost initiatives, and operating performance evolve over the course of the year.

As I wrap up, 2025 was a foundational year for Allegiant. We brought level of operations back in line with our fleet infrastructure, providing operating cost economics constructed to our leisure-focused, flexible capacity model.

We largely restored peak-day aircraft utilization, making more of our product available on the days our customers want to travel. We aligned management head count to level of operations and introduced performance-based pay programs for leaders across the business.

We integrated one-third of our firm order book from Boeing, improving team member productivity and delivering initial fuel efficiency targets. We divested of the Sunseeker business and refocused management efforts on the airline.

We paid down debt and positioned our balance sheet for healthy investment in our future. With more than 100 new-technology aircraft available in our order book, a healthy financial position to access the used aircraft market opportunistically, and a technology suite suitable for serving a larger customer base, I remain highly confident in the foundation we have here, whether that be for navigating through various demand environments, expanding our leisure offering to more communities, or enhancing our customer and team member experience.

With that, operator, this concludes our prepared remarks. We can now move to analyst questions.

Hey, thanks, afternoon. I think the term you used was January was exceptional from a demand standpoint.

Maybe just some color on what you think is driving that. I know it's early, but how is the rest of the quarter looking?

Are you seeing that same trend continue, any degree of moderation, just any thoughts there?

Thanks, Scott. It helps that we have seats pulling back a little bit when it comes to demand, but I don't think what we're talking about is much different than what we've heard from a number of carriers through this cycle.

The visitation coming through the front door is better than we've seen in several of the prior years, able to manifest both in terms of bookings and through some pricing capabilities and yields, which is a nice change of pace for us over the last couple of years. I think that's going to be really pronounced going through the spring break and Easter period.

Then, we'll kind of see what happens as bookings and demand starts to turn a corner toward post-Easter and into the summer time frame, which still a bit too far out for the current booking curve. I think we're hopeful as we get into the second and third quarters that there remains upside similar to what we've seen in January, but not something that I'm willing to bank on quite yet.

Error bars on what we've seen for summer period over the last several years are just so much wider that it's hard to have a great deal of conviction that this will definitively continue through that time frame.

Then if I heard correctly, I think you have a view that you guys are going to have the best RASM/CASM spread in the industry this year. Maybe just a little bit more color on how you are thinking about both RASM and CASM this year would be helpful.

Hey, Scott. I think in Drew's comments, he was referring to in 2025 the best spread between TRASM and CASM-ex.

I will say, as we look to 2026, we expect TRASM to improve more than CASM-ex this year as well, which reinforces the margin expansion that we're looking at.

That was backward looking. I apologize.

In a flatish capacity environment, how are you thinking about CASM this year?

Sure, Scott. Hey, it's BJ.

On a full-year basis, as you would expect, we would expect CASM to be up, for the most part across all lines in the P&L, except maybe aircraft rent, which we've talked about the last couple of calls. Then if you just think about the shape of capacity, you would expect CASM-ex to be up more in the first half of the year than it would be in the back half of the year.

I would just share, I would expect the second quarter to be the high point on a year-over-year comp basis. Then maybe just worth noting, we do expect CASM-ex on a full-year basis to be down versus 2024.

All right,

that's helpful. Thank you, guys.

Thanks, Scott.

Good evening. Thanks a lot for taking my question.

BJ, you mentioned in the prepared remarks that you're being conservative with the full-year guidance given how some of the macro issues hit Allegiant and the industry last year. Just to be clear on what's assumed for the full-year guidance, you're not really assuming the current strong January trends to continue.

Is that the right way to think about what gets you to the $8 versus if January trends were to continue, you get a number higher than that? Is that the right way to think about it?

Atul. I think that's right.

If you can just kind of think about Drew's answer there to Scott's question, that would line up.

Thank you. Then on the first quarter, I want to better understand what's assumed at the low end and at the high end.

If current booking trends were to continue, does that take you to the midpoint of the first quarter range, which is the $3, or does that take you to the high end of the range? Then what's assumed at the low end?

A lot there. What we're putting out for the midpoint is kind of where we see demand.

We know it will taper a little bit through the quarter for in-quarter bookings. That's just the nature of things.

The peak is certainly the weeks immediately after the new year. We won't persist at exactly the same level, but we wouldn't expect that either.

Then, variance from that on the rev side will take us one way or the other.

Oh yeah, hey, good afternoon. Two questions here.

When you talk about demand and the strength that you're seeing, how much of that is just a function of the fact that you're coming into the year with a very favorable supply backdrop? You indicated, Drew, that you're going to be down March and June and then it picks up, and maybe more specifically, where is the demand across the network?

Is it stronger in some regions versus others? We know that Vegas has been struggling, but we've also seen a lot of capacity come out of Vegas, I realize the headline number maybe somewhat deceiving, and so I'm just curious if you could drill down and give us a little more color.

Perhaps a little more color, but I'll probably stop short of great detail. Geographically, it all looks pretty strong.

To your point, it's not a new story that Vegas has struggled. I think LVCVA's numbers had it down about 7.5% or so in visitation year over year, but convention attendees were flat, right?

It's becoming a very event-driven and holiday-driven destination, which is very similar to the rest of our network, but a bit unfortunate to lose kind of that year-round rock star reliable that it once was. Certainly having seats down helps, but as I alluded to the visitation to the website, what's coming through the front door, we would have loved to have in '25 too when we were talking about how strong it was to start the year and we're beating that.

I feel really good about where we sit. I feel good about it in elevated capacity, and I feel really good about it with seats coming down a little bit.

Great.

Mike, hey, it's Greg. What Drew and team did in the plan this year as well is they concentrated more flying in the peaks and removed some in the off-peak as well.

I know Drew mentioned that in his opening remarks, but that too, that's a helpful backdrop for the strength we're seeing in demand.

Great. Then just my second question really turning to the merger and maybe just some of the mechanics.

Not that you've put out a filing, but just curious at what day or what timeframe you did actually file Hart-Scott-Rodino. I know it's a 30-day waiting period.

The deal was announced early January, if it was right around that time, we'd be coming up to at least the first 30-day period. Sort of tied to the merger, as we think about the cash component, the $4-plus per Sun Country share, I think that's about $200 million.

Is the plan to finance that out of cash, or would you finance that? Or is it out of cash, or would you actually finance it?

Thanks for taking my questions on that.

No, thanks for the question, Mike. I'll kick it off.

BJ will follow up on that second part around cash. As we put out, we expect the merger to close in the second half of '26, and to your point, there's conditions necessary to achieve that: Okay.

a shareholder vote, regulatory approval, and then some other customary closing conditions. For the shareholder vote and the regulatory approval or the HSR filing, we expect, Mike, to file both of those within the coming weeks.

Okay. Then post those filings and review, that'll trigger the timeline as well.

Oh, yeah, and then, BJ, do you want to jump in on the

Sure. Hey, Mike.

On the cash consideration for the merger closing, it's certainly going to depend on when in the year the closing would take place. I would just note, we have a bond out there that matures in the third quarter of 2027.

We've had an eye on the market to refinance that at some point. Ideally, we would refinance that and take a little bit more out Right.

and have some extra cash to pay the cash consideration of the merger closing. If the timing doesn't work out, there's more than a billion in unencumbered aircraft and engines, Yep.

and candidly, cash balances for the first quarter are ahead of schedule. We could start by just using cash balances if we need to.

Great. Thanks, everyone.

Thanks, Mike.

Hey, thank you. I just wonder if you could speak to how you are deploying the MAX aircraft.

Any more flexibility that you have currently versus maybe how you were using them with just a few on the property? As you begin to consider the combination with Sun Country's fleet and your own fleet, where do you see the biggest opportunities?

I think we talked about this in previous quarters. Starting around mid-November, we pivoted a little bit on MAX from flying a lot of cycles and getting up and down for pilot transition training into something that supported a bit of longer-haul flying, something that was a bit more commercially driven.

That started what, 2.5 months ago or so, and it's contributing to the numbers I quoted in the remarks, feeling great about that. We'll get into additional basing on that in the back half of this year as deliveries resume.

I forgot the second part.

Then just on the potential transaction, Duane, with fleet and how we would be flexible in that regard. I think we're really excited we think some upside in the deal to ensure that we can have the right aircraft at the right gauge in the right markets.

Both Sun Country and Allegiant, we own our aircraft, we have a great deal of flexibility there. It'd be too early to say what we're planning at this point, but we do think that provides some potential additional upside as part of the transaction as well.

Thanks for that. Then maybe just from a earnings power, earnings seasonality perspective, as you think about the quarterly baseline maybe for 2025, which quarter do you think has the most upside from your perspective?

Not necessarily a 2026 comment, but just to get to that normalized earnings power on an Allegiant standalone basis, as you look back on the four quarters of '25, which quarter do you think has the most upside?

Duane, let me kick it off, and I'll say I don't want to say that the third quarter I believe has the most upside, but what we're focused on is, as you recall, in 2025, we had a negative margin in the third quarter, and we're focused on turning that to a positive margin as well. In terms of the most upside, Drew, do you think it's kind of bookended on the first and the fourth quarter right now?

They've remained incredibly resilient in first and fourth quarter. Just thinking about the same-store flat-capacity backdrop, we were down about 6% in the second quarter and 5% in the third.

I don't know, and I'm not willing to guide for you today what recovers from that, but those certainly took the largest kind of core demand impact through '25, and from that perspective, would pose the biggest upside capability this year.

Very helpful. Thank you.

Hi, good afternoon, everyone. I guess first question for Greg.

I guess now that you're kind of back on track with your MAX order book here, you used to generate roughly $6 million in EBITDA per aircraft back in 2019. With this new fleet, any chance you can maybe give us an update on where you think that can go in today's environment with the new MAX fleet that you're going to have?

On the MAX aircraft, Andrew, they're definitely the larger share of ASMs that they're producing in the company, we think that becomes a meaningful structural tailwind. Overall, though, and I appreciate the comment about the improvements you've seen, we've really been focused on these initiatives that we've talked about to strengthen our business, kind of get back to what the Allegiant of old.

For many years, we have led the industry, and we're pleased with the progress we're making. Our first step is getting back to double-digit margins.

I think this year you're seeing in our guide that we're taking a meaningful move in that direction. We expect still later this year, we talked about it on a previous earnings call, to have an investor day.

I think the transaction announcement may push that back a little bit later than what we had initially anticipated, but that would be, I think, a helpful setting for us to talk about the long-term earnings potential, and we could drive it in margins or in terms of EBITDA per aircraft as well.

Got it. Fair enough.

Just my second question. I know there's obviously a lot of utilization to flex capacity over the year.

I guess if you see demand get materially better, do you have much capacity that you could potentially flex and add in, given your flat fleet growth? Thanks.

I mentioned a little bit in the remarks that we have some slack on peak days, kind of as we go through the summer. Certainly, off-peak has a ton of runway if the demand and fuel environments dictate that we add that in there.

I think we'd be making those calls, Easter-ish timeframe more or less, but certainly some slack that still exists there.

Great. Thank you very much.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question.

Obviously great quarter, great guidance. I wanted to just think about 1Q guidance versus the full year in a little bit more detail.

Last year, if we think about the seasonality of margins, we saw 2Q margins just a little bit lower than 1Q margins. Obviously, 3Q is very different.

Then 4Q margins above significantly the 1Q level. Is that the right general seasonality that we should be thinking for 2026 off of this 13.5% margin at the midpoint?

It seems like the full-year guidance at least at the $8 level really doesn't contemplate that kind of seasonality, but maybe I'm wrong. Maybe you could just kind of offer some thoughts there.

Sure. Maybe just thinking of the rev side in particular and going back to some of the earlier comments, a lot of this will depend on your view on what happens with core demand as we go through the summer.

I think the industry as a whole, and we're no different, taking a slightly more conservative view on how that will roll out. Again, we've just seen so much variability in those actual results as we go back through the last several years.

Depending on your level of bullishness on summer demand will probably dictate how you think that margin cadence looks through '26.

Hey, Josh, it's BJ. The only thing I'd add to that is just keep in mind Drew hinted at the top of the call that he's constrained on fleet heading into the summer.

We had some very modest delays on some MAX deliveries that are impacting the early part of summer capacity, and so that'll put a limit on what we can do in 2Q.

Okay. I guess what I was getting at is, some of this is in your control with the MAX kind of rolling on throughout the year.

It does seem very reasonable even in a wide range of demand scenarios that 4Q '26 margins are going to be considerably higher than your 1Q range. Unless something really changed in the demand environment, is that logic wrong?

Hey, John, it's Greg. I could step in maybe.

For the first quarter, I think we have about 28% remaining to book, and we're still early in the full year. We feel we put a guide out there for the full year that we're confident that we can deliver on.

Currently, demand is strong, and the economy, the backdrop, it seems good. To Drew's point, we just don't want to get ahead of ourselves, and so we want to take a more measured approach, and then update throughout the year each quarter.

Fair enough. I think we can tell what you're getting at.

Can I just ask a completely different question? There's a view out there that there could be a carrier liquidating relatively soon.

I'm not sure if that's true or not. I'm just curious if you guys have a playbook for an event like that.

Does that influence anything that you would do? Is there kind of a second step to that if we see an event like that occur in the industry?

I'll start, and Drew may want to add, but we don't view our success here at Allegiant as being kind of dependent on what other carriers in our sector may or may not do. We believe we're just uniquely positioned here at Allegiant, just because our differentiated model, and candidly, we have limited overlap.

What Drew and his team always do is they keep a close eye on capacity, industry capacity, and they'll continue to evaluate that as they would normally, right?

No, that's right, and we recently secured a little bit more space in Fort Lauderdale as it is. We've been looking to grow in there for a while, and it's candidly a bit of an onerous airport to be able to grow into, and we've been great partners with them.

They've been great partners to us, helping to work to secure that, and we're going to keep trying to grow where we see demand and success, and that's one of the places where we've been successful in doing so.

If that happened in the near term, would you have the ability to lean into that to flex capacity into that? It sounds like there are some aircraft constraints as well, or do you think you'd just be a beneficiary more on the yield side or something like that?

To be determined. It's a lot of speculation in there.

Like we mentioned earlier, we do have some slack left in our schedule that we'll deploy as we see fit kind of as we see what shakes out. Whether that comes through capacity, whether that comes through just a few less seats in the market benefiting pricing for the short term, I guess we'll see.

It's hard to speculate at this point, I think.

All right. Fair enough.

Thank you for all the answers.

Hey, good afternoon. Just maybe expanding a little bit on Mike's earlier question, BJ, I was kind of curious how you're thinking about balance sheet this year and targets and you do have a big capex plan this year and this merger.

Curious how you're kind of thinking about where you'd like to kind of keep the balance sheet.

Sure. Thanks, Savi.

I've spoken on these calls for a while about trying to keep net leverage in the two to 2.5 turns. We don't have a specific mandate from Greg or our board on that, but we update on it every quarter, and I think that's a healthy place to be.

I'd like to see that number closer to two versus 2.5, but as we've kind of alluded to on the call, there's been a lot of opportunity out in the industry, and there are certain times where we should move within that range. As I think about 2026, the things that we need to consider are refinancing our bond, so that's maturing in 2027.

We don't need to do that in 2026, but the markets are quite constructive at the moment. It could be a good opportunity to build up some cash balances at attractive economics.

Then there's the consideration, the cash consideration due to Sun Country in the back of the year. Then we've been trying to keep cash balances elevated a little bit toward the higher end of our targets, and that's because we'd like to envision a world where we're paying out our pilot retention bonus at some point soon as well, and so we want to be ready to do that when we have an opportunity.

Those are the big things. Then we have a big capex year, as you mentioned.

Now, all of that could be financed at delivery. We'll probably pay cash for airplanes in the first half of the year, and then think about aircraft financing in the back half of the year.

Savi, it's Greg. I just wanted to add a couple comments on BJ's points there, and maybe a little bit more high-level, and that's that, owning our fleet and opportunistically buying aircraft is a differentiator for us at Allegiant, and we think it sets us apart, particularly in our segment of the industry, and it's a major driver behind our durability, our low ownership costs, and our flexibility in that regard.

With the Sun Country acquisition, just the work that BJ and the team have done to strengthen the balance sheet over the years and the way we structured the deal, the acquisition isn't going to stretch us by any means. In fact, post-close and integration, it's going to strengthen the balance sheet.

We have a favorable, well-timed MAX order, and you combine that with the free cash flow that Sun Country's currently producing, that's going to help us not only maintain a low leverage, but continue to delever post-combination.

That's well said, Greg. Thank you for adding that.

I think, inside of Greg's comments there, Savi, the question is if we wanted to raise the financing, do we do it ahead of having clarity on all the approval dates and the close date, knowing the close date definitively, because we may raise a little bit of additional capital today to be ready to close, but immediately on closing, we'll benefit, like Greg mentioned, from the cash flow that that business produces.

Right. Good point.

The visit's thorough, and so I'll leave it at that. Thank you.

Thank you.

Hey, everyone. Thank you.

Maybe we could just start on the new market development. It's kind of been a bit since we've started to add back new cities and what not.

You highlighted the 10% of your capacity in 2Q and 3Q. Just curious if you could provide maybe some historical context to what a unit revenue drag would normally be on new markets just as we start to think about past 1Q in general.

Thank you.

I think in the past what we've talked about is something in the 10% to 15% range relative to the rest of the system, and no reason to expect it to be different through this cycle.

Helpful. Then just in terms of your well-timed MAX order, you've sounded very, very bullish on MAXs in general.

I believe you have 80 on options that are still waiting to be converted or potentially converted. Can you just talk about how you would approach that options side of the business or the options for the MAXs in general?

Are you going to wait for Sun Country to close? Just trying to understand the dynamic of where we could be in a couple years from now on terms of just the overall maybe a decade from now, where we could be in terms of just MAX contribution in general for the company.

Thank you.

Conor, yeah, thanks for the question. As you can tell, we're really excited about the opportunity, and excited about what we're seeing in the firm portion of the MAX order.

There are 80 options. I think we would need to start talking about exercising those options, if that's the decision, in the back half of this year, and that would be for deliveries beginning in 2028.

I don't think that we have to wait for a Sun Country close to make that decision, because I believe that exercising some of those options at least is accretive to our standalone business, but I think it becomes much, much more powerful when you think about the combined fleet. When we had the call on the merger, we talked a lot about synergies, but it was really difficult to quantify fleet synergies, in particular around the P&L, because there's just a lot of trading opportunity between the two airlines that own their entire fleet, and we just have such a better opportunity to take advantage of the option order book.

Might I just ask one more on top of that? Like is the A3 like do you envision the A320 to be part of the fleet like, further down the line?

It just seems like the MAX has done wonders for your business in general, and obviously Sun Country is a 737 operator. Just like any any thoughts on on single single fleet in general?

Thank you.

Sure, Conor. I think I got Loaded, I know.

first part of your question and probably forgot to maybe give you a responsible CFO comment and say the number one thing to guide that decision is probably the shape of our balance sheet. The 320's been a fantastic machine, a fantastic producer for the Allegiant business for a long time.

When we announced the MAX order, I think we talked about the combined fleet being about 50% Airbus, 50% Boeing at the end of the order. Candidly, we haven't sat around internally and discussed that changing significantly.

Like I said, there's probably a little bit more opportunity on the MAX side on the assumption that we would close the Sun Country transaction, but I think owning aircraft is more important than which of the two aircraft right now, and in order to own the aircraft, we need to maintain a healthy balance sheet.

Thank you.

Great. Thanks.

Good evening, everyone. I think at the top of the call, you mentioned a tech stack opportunity and kind of how you're excited about what's coming.

Can you just elaborate on that a little bit, and kind of is that something that you are putting in place now, or do you think that needs to wait until after the merger?

Thanks, Ravi, for the question. It's a really important one.

We've been through a technology transformation here for a number of years, and I'd like to think where we're at today is that our technology investments are much more focused and they're very practical. As we modernize our IT stack, it's unlocking a lot of value for us.

These platforms, particularly on the commercial side, they're allowing us to move much more quickly. What we also were able to accomplish as part of this is bringing our data together and having better data and the ability to use that data to make better decisions.

We're going to continue to be more nimble, continue in terms of technology, continue to find ways to improve, particularly on the commercial side, but throughout the business. For example, we were seeing just for the winter storms that we just recently had, the new technology stack allowed us to communicate better with our customers, and that's what we're ultimately trying to drive.

It's still early, but we're pretty encouraged by what we're seeing and the changes we've made in this area of the business.

Understood. That's helpful.

Maybe as a follow-up, you mentioned the Investor Day that you mentioned earlier for this year. Do you think that's still a 2026 event, or do you think it gets pushed out of '27?

I think it will pace with the close of the transaction that we're talking about, but we would expect, if it closed during the timeline of what we put out there, the second half of this year, we still think there's going to be room to have an Investor Day this year in 2026.

Great. I think that's going to be a pretty important catalyst for the stock and kind of figuring out normalized EPS, would strongly encourage that.

Thank you.

Thanks, Ravi.

Oh, hey, good afternoon. Thanks for the time, you guys.

Couple of questions here. I guess just I hope you don't cringe too much at this question, leave it to me to kick a dead horse here.

Going back to the guide, does the $8 embed a full or partial recovery of the five percentage points of RASM that was lost in 2025? I guess just beyond 2026, more broadly, just given the K-shaped economic recovery that we've experienced, Drew, are some of the lowest leisure demand buckets still missing here as you kind of give us this revenue outlook?

I guess related to that, if that demand segment doesn't come back, can you still manage the airline to a mid-teens operating margin throughout the cycle?

Thanks, Dan. I'll try to unpack some of this here.

I'd be remiss not to give another shout-out for our customer mix, does tend to be on the top part of that K-shape, right? Where median income over 100k, generally originating from lower cost-of-living DMAs.

We do have a really healthy customer that flies on us. I don't think that the K-shaped economy by any means is any more headwind or worrisome for me, I guess, as we look forward.

What we provide is truly valuable in the communities we serve, and we can still stimulate with price. We can still play with our schedule in a way that's going to produce the right outcome for what we're looking for, so that is not something that I will lose sleep over at this point.

Or what's the starting of this?

I would just add to that, Dan, that just to echo what Drew said, that our business and model is designed to protect margins, the flexibility that we built into it. What we've talked a lot to the street about over the past year or so, the initiatives and the execution of the team to really strengthen that foundation.

Just to Drew's point, we feel really good where we're at and the flexibility we have and our ability just to serve the leisure customer.

I remembered the first part of the question. As we think about the middle part of the year and recovering kind of that same-store deficiency we saw last year, we're not plugging a full recovery into that number, so that's kind of where you would see a clear upside story if the economy does get there.

We're above zero on it, but not all the way back.

Very helpful. Then second question here.

Going back to the script and the reference to the next phase of the credit card program, I'm just wondering what are the benchmarks that you'd like that credit card program to hit, I guess, first? Then second of all, are there steps that you can take to get your credit card holders to spend more, or as you think about that next phase and where the revenue upside is, what are the areas of focus that really make sense?

There's definitively steps that we can take, and we know that because we've seen it in action over the last 5 months. I mentioned at the top, four of the last 5 months being up double-digit percentage in new card acquisition, spend continues to look really strong.

I think we just surpassed 600,000 card holders. It's a really great story as we've applied some kind of some new tactics and new thoughts even within the existing program, and then as you refresh and bring it to something a little bit more modern, I think there's a meaningful amount of runway that exists there.

As we think about how it's been communicated elsewhere, you see 10% or more of remuneration as a percent of revenue. I don't know that we get all the way to 10, but I think we get above the 5% or so that we did in 2025.

You think about another 2 to 3 points on that, it's a pretty compelling case right there.

Absolutely. Thanks for the time, you guys.

Good afternoon. Wanted to dig into the capacity outlook for '26.

The 10% to 15% the new routes is consistent with your historical profile. If you could speak to the composition, departure, stage, and gauge, and then on utilization, hours per day year on year, and then the mix, peak versus off-peak year on year.

Then also on the allocations, just look at 1Q, inventory is down solidly across most of your key markets, obviously with the exception of FLL, and how you're thinking about inventory, I guess, distribution against that full-year guide. Thanks.

By market.

By market. You got it.

How about day, too? We'll kind of go through all of it.

I'll do my best to unpack everything we talked through here. Stage and gauge are a little bit off-setting through the year, those are somewhat of a neutral for us.

We talked about Lauderdale. Some of the other growth spots that kind of come from the new market announcements.

We filled out SNA a little bit. Filled out a little more in Gulf Shores.

Lauderdale, we talked about. In the spring, it's come a little bit at the expense of Provo capacity that's gone elsewhere, but by and large, we'll be back by summer.

Some of it is really just been kind of a seasonal kind of sculpting, having to make some tough choices through the spring. Really a lot of that capacity that is coming out is off-peak day.

We're able to hold our peak days pretty close to flat in terms of actual flying, which to Greg's earlier point, will be a bit of a tailwind to our unit revenue outlook, and better overall patterns for customers on that perspective. I can promise you I didn't hit all of your topics there.

Is there anything else you wanted me to dive in there?

Aircraft utilization where we stepped it up meaningfully '25 versus '24. I want to say it was low 6s hours per aircraft per day in '24, up to seven, over seven in '25.

I think it's flat, maybe slightly up a little bit in '26 for overall aircraft utilization.

Great. Okay.

I'll keep it to that. Thank you.

Hey, good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for the time.

Just want to bring it back to the fourth quarter beat for a minute. You came in ahead despite the government shutdown.

We don't know what your RASM or CASM-ex expectations were going into the quarter. Can you just walk us through what went better and maybe just put some numbers around maybe how much better roughly, if not exactly.

I'm really just trying to get a sense of where there might be continued momentum into the first quarter. Thanks.

I'm happy to start. The rev outlook outperformed a little bit.

In particular, I think we had communicated that we did see a bit of a slowdown during government shutdown as flights were being pulled back, but that recovered so well in the weeks following, and yeah, I talked a little bit about the holiday period, but that three-week stretch, with some of which does spill into January, being a positive on a year-over-year was certainly a bigger catalyst than I had anticipated at the beginning of the quarter. Kind of that late demand spike was a good guy.

Sure, Katie. I'll just add in.

We did have a handful of beats on the cost side as well. There were a few areas.

Salaries and wages came in a little bit lower than we had expected, and then I think the point of your question, there are a few items, maybe one that I'll call out, which is in the maintenance line, we had a meaningful beat there, which I would expect to be a bit of a shift into the first quarter of '26.

Great. Thanks.

Then maybe, BJ, just sticking with you, on the potential for refinancing and perhaps looking to raise debt against your unencumbered assets, you mentioned that the markets look constructive right now. Is there any structure or market that looks particularly attractive, capital markets, bank debt, finance lease, Jolco, whatever it may be?

We like all of those products. I think for me and certainly others can weigh in here, for me, I just think it's important that we have a piece of the capital stack on the debt side that is not aircraft-funded, because the aircraft have proven to be resilient throughout cycles, including through a pandemic, and I just really like the ability to tap into aircraft to raise capital, whether that's opportunistically for a large acquisition, or whether that's out of defense because we see fluctuation in the demand environment.

I just like the idea of keeping something of similar size to our existing bond at the time of its original issuance, which was around $500 million. I like keeping something like that out there, which is secured by corporate collateral or the loyalty program.

Great. Thanks for the color.

Thanks, Katie.

Thank you all for joining us today. We'll see you next quarter.