Great. Thanks, operator, and welcome, everyone.

Joining me today are Jon Winkelried, Chief Executive Officer, and Jack Weingart, Chief Financial Officer. In addition, our Executive Chairman and Co-Founder Jim Coulter and our President Todd Sisitsky are here with us for the Q&A portion of this call.

Nehal Raj is also joining us today for the Q&A session, given his role leading the software sector at TPG and as Co-Managing Partner of TPG Capital. I'd like to remind you this call may include forward-looking statements that do not guarantee future events or performance.

Please refer to TPG's earnings release and SEC filings for factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these statements. TPG undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, except as required by law.

Within our discussion and earnings release, we're presenting GAAP and non-GAAP measures, and we believe certain non-GAAP measures that we discuss on this call are relevant in assessing the financial performance of the business. These non-GAAP measures are reconciled to the nearest GAAP figures in TPG's earnings release, which is available on our website.

Please note that nothing on this call constitutes an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase an interest in any TPG fund. Looking briefly at our results for the fourth quarter, we reported GAAP net income attributable to TPG Inc.

of $77 million, and after-tax distributable earnings of $304 million, or 71 cents per share of Class A common stock. We declared a dividend of 61 cents per share of Class A common stock, which will be paid on March 5th, 2026 to holders of record as of February 19th, 2026.

With that, I'll turn the call over to Jon.

Morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us.

We look forward to discussing our strong results for the fourth quarter and full year. 2025 was a breakout year for TPG, and we entered 2026 with strong momentum.

Before we turn to our results, I did want to briefly touch on a topic that has been top of mind for investors around the intersection of software and AI. This is an important question, but not a new one for us at TPG.

As a firm who's been investing in AI solutions for over a decade, the question of where AI is an opportunity in technology and where it poses a risk is deeply embedded in our investment approach. Let me put our software investing activities in context, and talk about our approach across our asset classes.

Today, software represents 11% of our total AUM, with the majority in private equity and minimal exposure in credit. Starting with credit, within our direct lending business, we focus on sponsor-backed companies with strong cash flow profiles and lend at the top of the capital structure with strong financial covenants that give us a seat at the table.

Given our approach, we have not invested heavily in the software sector and have not offered ARR-based loans. Today, software represents approximately 2% of our credit AUM.

In private equity, you've consistently heard from us on how important our sector-focused and theme-based approach is to our investment activities, and we've invested in software for more than 20 years. Today, software companies represent 18% of our private equity AUM.

Our long-standing presence in the software space has enabled us to develop deep expertise and nuanced perspectives on the sector. We have a tremendous level of access to the companies into which we ultimately invest.

As a result, we're highly selective in our investment approach, recognizing that not all software companies are created equal. Some companies will be disrupted by the AI evolution, while others will be empowered and accelerate.

As veteran software investors, our decisions focus on characteristics that will determine whether AI is an opportunity versus a threat. Examples of areas where we believe AI is an opportunity include software businesses that are systems of record deeply embedded in workflows where AI enhances the customer experience, vertical software companies that have developed proprietary data perimeters where the application of AI creates incremental revenue opportunities, and cyber security firms, which stand to be net beneficiaries due to the increased threats to enterprise data security from AI.

As a result of our focused and selective investment approach, we believe we've built a robust and resilient software portfolio that reflects our disciplined framework. We would also note that as long-term, focused investors, market dislocation generally creates compelling opportunities.

With valuations resetting across the board, we believe we're well positioned to capitalize on attractive investments by continuing to apply our disciplined approach to this important sector. Now turning to our results, 2025 was an outstanding year for TPG.

We entered the year with a clear set of strategic priorities and executed across the board, setting new records in capital raising and deployment. Our performance in 2025 is a powerful proof point of our growth strategy, demonstrating the strength of our global franchise and our ability to generate differentiated outcomes for our clients and shareholders.

First, on capital formation, we set an ambitious goal to raise significantly more capital in 2025 than in 2024. We delivered on this objective, raising a record $51 billion, an impressive 71% increase over the prior year.

This reflects the strong upward trajectory of our capital formation efforts as our franchise has scaled and diversified. We continue to gain share among the world's largest allocators of capital, who are choosing TPG given our strong performance across a broad set of strategies.

In 2025, we formed five cross-platform and multi-fund strategic partnerships, representing more than $10 billion of total commitments that are flowing in over time. As we enter 2026, we're engaged in active dialogues around several additional multi-billion-dollar mandates.

Second, we successfully diversified and extended our capital sources across key distribution channels. In 2025, we made meaningful progress in our private wealth strategy as we expanded our presence in the channel through new products and distribution partners, which I'll discuss in more detail shortly.

In insurance, our capital raised in the channel grew more than 50% in 2025, driven by our strong origination capabilities and the increasing demand from insurers for enhanced yield. Last month, we announced the long-term strategic partnership with Jackson Financial, marking a significant milestone for our insurance solutions business.

This partnership is structured to provide us with long duration, highly predictable fee revenue to further scale our credit capabilities and strengthen our position as a preferred partner for insurers. Third, we had an extremely active year of investing as we leaned into our high conviction thematic areas and continued to deliver strong performance for our clients.

Our investment pace accelerated throughout the year, reaching a record $19 billion in the fourth quarter, up 88% year-over-year. Total capital deployed in 2025 climbed to $52 billion, the highest annual deployment in TPG's history.

This reflects the continued scaling of our capital base and product set, combined with our differentiated sourcing capabilities. Importantly, throughout this period of robust capital deployment, portfolio performance remained strong, resulting in double-digit value creation across nearly all of our platforms in 2025.

We also maintained a consistent and disciplined focus on monetizations and generated $23 billion of realizations in 2025. We recently announced several significant exits and are off to a strong start for DPI in 2026, which Jack will discuss.

Finally, we expanded our franchise both organically and inorganically, targeting adjacent areas that are highly complementary to our existing strategies. In July, we acquired Peppertree, broadening our digital infrastructure investment capabilities and providing us with immediate scale in the wireless communications sector.

We're pleased with the integration of the Peppertree platform and are pursuing several attractive growth opportunities, including extending the duration of Peppertree's capital. We also continued to drive organic innovation, launching and scaling several new products in 2025.

These include TICC, our Asia growth equity strategy, Hybrid Solutions, Sports, and Advantage Direct Lending, our new core middle-market direct lending strategy, which I'll discuss shortly. Collectively, our new and emerging strategies attracted over $7 billion of commitments in 2025, underscoring our ability to effectively identify and scale high-potential opportunities across the TPG ecosystem.

We ended 2025 with over $300 billion in AUM, up 23% year-over-year, and are experiencing a fundamental increase in our earnings power. Against that backdrop, I'd like to highlight each of our platforms, starting with credit.

2025 was a breakout year for our credit franchise. We successfully expanded many of our long-standing client relationships into our credit strategies and raised capital strategically through a variety of fund types, channels, and customized solutions.

After setting ourselves up with substantial dry powder, our credit investment pace has begun to accelerate as we access a broader set of opportunities, which is driving management fee growth. We raised a record $21 billion of credit capital during the year, up 67% from 2024, with a record $9 billion raised in the fourth quarter alone.

In Credit Solutions, we held a final close for our third flagship fund, bringing total capital raised to $6.2 billion. This exceeded our initial target of $4.5 billion by nearly 40% and is double the size of its predecessor.

In connection with this campaign, we welcomed a number of new leading institutional investors to the Credit Solutions platform and to TPG. We also extended our existing credit capabilities into adjacent areas where we have a right to win.

We recently launched TPG Advantage Direct Lending, or ADL, our new core middle-market direct lending strategy. ADL leverages TPG's corporate credit and private equity franchises to originate proprietary investment opportunities.

This includes lending to companies that graduate from Twin Brook's lower-middle-market portfolio, as well as sourcing directly for ADL through our network of companies, sponsors, and intermediaries. Early client engagement has been strong, and during the quarter we held a first close of $875 million of equity, which translates to over $2 billion of total buying power, including anticipated leverage.

We've already built a portfolio of more than 10 first lien loans, and our near-term pipeline remains robust. Notably, ADL is structured as an evergreen vehicle, and over time we expect to expand its product set to serve clients across key channels, including insurance and wealth.

Our success in expanding our credit capital base has enhanced our investment capabilities, enabling us to lead and participate in a wider range of transactions. Our credit platform invested a record $25 billion in 2025, which represents a 54% increase year-over-year.

In asset-based finance, we deployed $2 billion of capital in the fourth quarter, including our residential whole loan strategy, where we continue to be a market leader. Over the course of the year, we further expanded our capabilities and closed notable transactions in consumer investment-grade ABF, residential and second lien mortgages, and bank synthetic risk transfers.

In middle-market direct lending, Twin Brook had its most active quarter of the year, with $3.7 billion of gross originations in 2025. Twin Brook established new lending relationships with more than 50 companies, bringing its portfolio to more than 300 unique borrowers.

As a result of our leadership in the lower-middle market, we enter 2026 with a very active pipeline. In Credit Solutions, with public high-yield spreads remaining near historic tights, we continue to focus on customized private financing solutions, which offer a more attractive risk-return profile.

In the fourth quarter, Credit Solutions deployed $1.4 billion of capital to support the scaling of existing investments and to fund several new financings. Turning to private equity, our franchise continues to meaningfully outperform the broader market.

While overall industry fundraising for PE declined 11% in 2025, we grew our private equity fundraising by over 80% to $28 billion in the year. Amidst the flight to quality and scale, our clients continue to choose TPG for our track record of delivering differentiated returns and DPI.

In the fourth quarter, we closed an additional $2.2 billion for TPG Capital X and Healthcare Partners III, bringing the total capital raised to $12.2 billion, including commitments that are signed but not yet closed. Momentum in the Capital and Healthcare Partners campaign continues to be strong.

We also held a first close for TPG Sports in the fourth quarter, raising $750 million of third-party capital, including commitments from several of our leading institutional investors. We're evaluating a robust pipeline of investment opportunities ranging from sports-related operating companies to essential picks and shovels service providers.

Across our private equity strategies, we invested $21 billion of capital in 2025, double the prior year. In TPG Capital, during the fourth quarter, we announced the carve-out of the manufacturing, connectivity, and data business from PTC.

This investment is consistent with our deep expertise in sourcing and executing corporate carve-outs and structured partnerships. Our investment teams have been very active across our Rise and Rise Climate funds, with $5 billion of signed or closed investments in 2025.

Given the global scope of our strategy and the unprecedented growth in energy demand, our opportunity set continues to expand. In the fourth quarter, TPG Rise Climate acquired a majority stake in Pike Corporation, a leading turnkey infrastructure solutions provider for electric utilities in the U.S., in partnership with the case.

Power and utility services is a core thematic focus for us, supported by considerable tailwinds in utility spending. TPG Rise Climate's Global South Initiative announced a $1 billion investment in the AI data center business of Tata Consultancy Services.

We're partnering with Tata to collaborate with hyperscalers and AI-native businesses to build data center capacity to meet India's accelerating demand. This proprietary opportunity stems from our long-standing partnership with the Tata Group, and builds on our successful investments in both Tata Motors and Tata Technologies.

Additionally, our GP-led secondaries business continues to differentiate itself as an attractive liquidity provider and strong partner for best-in-class assets. In the fourth quarter, TPG GP Solutions was a lead investor in a €2 billion continuation vehicle for Wireless Logic, a leading global internet of things solutions provider.

We believe this investment is the largest single-asset CV completed in Europe in 2025. Moving to real estate, we continue to build out and drive value creation across our investment portfolios ahead of a major fundraising cycle.

In 2025, we deployed $6 billion of capital, and our real estate platform appreciated 9%, which we believe is among the highest in the industry. During the fourth quarter, our Thematic Advantage Core-Plus strategy, or TAC Plus, acquired a majority interest in Quarterra, an established national developer of high-quality multifamily communities.

TAC Plus carved out Quarterra from Lennar, one of the nation's leading homebuilders and an existing partner of TPG through our essential housing strategy. We are excited to partner with Lennar and Quarterra to help address the critical need for attainable, high-quality rental housing in the U.S.

The deal pipeline across our platforms remains robust. We ended the year with $72 billion of dry powder, and given our ability to source proprietary opportunities coupled with an improving transaction environment, we expect our deployment pace to continue to accelerate.

Turning back to private wealth, I'd like to provide additional detail on this important growth area for TPG. We expanded our retail product suite, which is now anchored by T-POP and T-CAP, and continue to capitalize on the growing demand for our differentiated investment capabilities.

T-POP has had one of the most successful launches for a private equity evergreen vehicle. T-POP has delivered an inception-to-date return of 23%, and the T-POP strategy has generated $1.5 billion of total inflows through January.

We're actively expanding investor access to T-POP, including our geographic reach into regions like Asia. Inflows for T-CAP, our non-traded BDC, continue to grow, and it ended the year with $4.5 billion of AUM.

Despite the recent volatility and uncertainty in the BDC space, T-CAP has had positive net subscriptions every quarter since inception, with redemption requests of less than 1% of total shares outstanding in the fourth quarter. Our distinctive focus on lending to the lower-middle market, supported by conservative capital structures and active portfolio management, continues to attract strong demand.

Across these private wealth products, we've meaningfully grown our brand and distribution network. Our private wealth fundraising grew 66% year-over-year, and we're now partnered with over 40 platforms globally.

As we deepen our engagement in the channel, we are encouraged by the traction we are gaining with both new and prospective partners. Taking a step back as I reflect on the four years since our IPO, it's clear that we've driven transformational growth and reached a new level of operating scale.

We've tripled our AUM, expanded our FRE margin by almost 800 basis points, and grown our fee-related earnings at a 31% compound annual rate. As we look ahead, we expect to continue driving outsized growth by scaling our existing and newer strategies, deepening the integration of our capital markets capabilities across the full breadth of our franchise, driving additional margin expansion and operating leverage, further penetrating the private wealth and insurance channels, extending the duration of our capital base, and selectively capitalizing on inorganic opportunities.

We enter 2026 with significant momentum that reflects the strength of the franchise we've built. Our increased diversification, scaled investment strategies, and strong returns have created a powerful flywheel effect across the firm, and we look forward to continuing to deliver sustained growth and value for our clients and shareholders.

Jack will now walk through our financial results and provide more details on our outlook.

Thank you, Jon, and thank you all for joining us today. As Jon noted, 2025 was an outstanding year for the firm.

We've been executing on our growth strategy and translating our fundraising momentum and investment performance into strong financial results. We reported full year fee-related revenue of $2.1 billion, including $628 million for the fourth quarter, which grew 36% year-over-year.

Our management fees reached $475 million for the quarter, up 18% from the prior year, as we continue to successfully drive both fund-over-fund growth across our private equity strategies and fee-earning deployment in our credit platform. Additionally, fourth quarter transaction and monitoring fees more than tripled from the prior year to $122 million.

This resulted in full year 2025 transaction and monitoring fees of $249 million, which grew nearly 70% year-over-year. This step-function increase was driven by our accelerated deployment pace, as well as the further integration of our strong capital markets capabilities across our platforms and geographies.

We also generated $29 million of fee-related performance revenues in the fourth quarter as a result of strong fund performance by both T-POP and T-CAP. We reported fee-related earnings of $326 million for the quarter and $953 million for the year, which increased 25% from 2024.

As a result of our significant capital markets revenue at the end of the year, our fourth quarter FRE margin reached a record 52%, and our full year FRE margin was 45%, a 340-basis-point expansion from 2024. I would note that even if we normalize our fourth quarter results to reflect a lower level of capital markets revenue, we would still have exceeded the year above the mid-40s margin target we had guided to previously.

Turning to PRE, in the fourth quarter we generated $48 million of realized performance allocations, driven primarily by our credit platform, bringing the full year total to $205 million. We ended the year with a net accrued performance balance of $1.3 billion, and have good visibility into near-term PRE, which I'll discuss in a few minutes.

Our accelerated earnings in the quarter drove a higher marginal tax rate as we utilized the tax benefits from our RSU vesting more quickly than anticipated. This resulted in a higher tax rate in the fourth quarter.

As a reminder, our annual RSU vesting occurs each January, which drives a seasonal employer tax expense in our cash-based comp and benefits line item that impacts our FRE margin. This expense generates tax deductions, resulting in a seasonally low first quarter tax rate.

In Q1 '26, we expect approximately $20 million of employer tax expense associated with this year's vesting, and a tax rate in the high single digits to low double digits. We expect that tax rate to remain in there until we utilize our tax deductions.

Our fourth quarter after-tax distributable earnings increased 17% year-over-year to $304 million, or 71 cents per share of Class A common stock, our highest level since becoming a public company. We finished 2025 with $303 billion of total AUM, which increased 23% from 2024.

This was driven by $51 billion of capital raised and $24 billion of value creation, partially offset by $23 billion of realizations over the last 12 months. Our fee-earning AUM grew 20% in 2025 to $170 billion at year end.

Even with our strong investment pace, our dry powder increased 26% year-over-year to $72 billion at the end of 2025, representing 43% of FAUM. This positions us well to continue capitalizing on an increasingly active market.

AUM subject to fee-earning growth was $40 billion at year end, including $29 billion of AUM not yet earning fees, which increased nearly 50% over the past year. This was primarily driven by strong fundraising across our credit platform, which generally earns fees on invested capital, as well as capital committed for certain funds that have not yet been activated, such as Healthcare Partners III.

Notably, we ended the year with $19 billion of credit AUM subject to fee-earning growth, which represents approximately $130 million of annual fee revenue when deployed. We're well positioned to drive accelerated growth in credit fee-earning AUM going forward, due to our ability to effectively pursue credit opportunities across the full size and return spectrum.

Our AUM growth continues to be underpinned by the strength of our investment portfolios, with double-digit value creation across nearly all of our platforms in 2025. Our private equity strategies in aggregate appreciated 3% in the fourth quarter and 11% over the last 12 months.

Across our Capital, Growth, and Impact platforms, our portfolio companies have consistently outperformed the broader market, with revenue and EBITDA growth of approximately 17% and 20%, respectively, over the past 12 months. Our credit platform also appreciated 3% in the quarter and 11% over the last 12 months.

In middle-market direct lending, our rigorous underwriting standards have resulted in continued strong credit quality across our portfolios. Non-accruals remain extremely low at just over 1%, while our average interest coverage ratio has held steady at more than 2 times.

In Credit Solutions, our second flagship fund generated net returns of 4% in the fourth quarter and 11% for the full year, which continue to meaningfully exceed the U.S. High Yield Bond Index.

Lastly, in asset-backed finance, our first ABF fund's net IRR since inception remains above its target range at 13.2% at the end of 2025. Additionally, our MVP fund, with $6.8 billion of AUM, generated a net return of 9.4% for the year, with significantly less volatility than the broader market.

Across our real estate platform, our portfolios appreciated 3% in the fourth quarter and more than 9% for the year. This strong performance was driven by particularly robust value creation in TREP's data center holdings, as well as appreciation across our hotel, residential, and office portfolios.

As Jon mentioned, we believe our real estate performance has outpaced the industry as a result of our portfolio construction and deep thematic conviction in sectors with positive secular demand and resilient operating fundamentals. Now I'd like to walk through our outlook for 2026.

First, regarding fundraising, 2025 was clearly a breakout year for us, with fundraising increasing 71% year-over-year to a record $51 billion. Importantly, we do not see this as a cyclical peak.

In fact, given the growth and diversification of our business over the past few years, our strong investment performance, and the continued build-out of our fundraising team, we believe we have reached a new level of expected annual fundraising, with less volatility and less cyclicality. As a result, we expect 2026 to be another robust year of capital formation, with aggregate capital raising expected to exceed $50 billion.

Our fundraising will be driven by the following key building blocks. In real estate, we expect 2026 to mark the beginning of a major fundraising cycle and a multi-year period of growth.

We expect to begin fundraising for TPG Real Estate's next fund, TREP V, as well as our Asia fund, our Japan Value Fund, and our TPG AG U.S. Real Estate Fund.

In credit, we expect to further scale our capital base across all of our existing strategies and to expand into adjacent areas and fund types. This includes growing our investment-grade ABF business and raising additional capital for our CLO platform, as well as our newer strategies, such as Advantage Direct Lending and Hybrid Solutions.

In private equity, we expect several drivers, including the completion of our flagship fundraises across our Capital and Climate private equity funds, additional closes for our GP Solutions, Tech Adjacencies, our Asia Growth Equity Fund, our Sports Fund, and our Transition Infrastructure Fund, and initial closes for our next Rise and Peppertree funds. In our insurance solutions business, we expect our strategic partnership with Jackson to close this month.

As we noted on our call earlier this year, we structured the agreement with a minimum requirement of $4 billion of FAUM after two years and $12 billion of FAUM by the end of year five. In addition to our Jackson relationship, we expect insurance solutions more broadly to continue to be an important growth driver for the firm.

In private wealth, we expect our inflows to inflect further in 2026, as we broaden our distribution networks globally. We expect to onboard several significant distribution partners for T-POP over the next few quarters, with a particular focus on expanding our international footprint.

Additionally, we intend to grow our suite of wealth-dedicated products to showcase TPG's differentiated investment capabilities, with a multi-strategy credit interval fund and a non-traded REIT as our near-term priorities. We're also actively engaged in several discussions with potential partners on strategic, innovative public-private products, and we'll have more to say here in the coming quarters.

Next, on our FRE margin, we remain focused on driving greater operating leverage across the firm, even as we continue to invest in a number of long-term growth opportunities. In 2026, we expect a full year FRE margin of approximately 47%.

This would represent an increase from 45% in 2025, which was somewhat elevated, and an increase of approximately 700 basis points from 40% in 2023, pro forma for the Angelo Gordon acquisition. Turning to PRE, we've been active on the realization front, and assuming market conditions remain favorable, we would expect our strong and consistent pace to continue or even accelerate.

Based only on our current pipeline of signed monetizations, including the strategic sale of OneOncology to Cencora, which closed earlier this week, we expect to generate realized performance revenue of more than $50 million for public shareholders in the first quarter. On the non-core expenses included in our realized investment income and other line, we expect the expense associated with the build-out of our New York office at Hudson Yards to continue through 2026.

We plan to consolidate our New York offices and take full occupancy of the space in the first half of 2027. Lastly, at the end of the fourth quarter, our net debt was $1.6 billion, and we had $1.75 billion of undrawn capacity on our revolver.

At the time of closing of our strategic partnership with Jackson, we will invest $500 million into Jackson common stock, which will be funded through our revolver. Pro forma for this, we expect our net debt balance to be $2.1 billion.

In closing, 2025 was an exceptional year as we successfully executed on our growth objectives and demonstrated the growing earnings power across our global platform. The strong financial and operating results we reported today are a direct result of the strategic building blocks we've been putting in place over the last several years to drive the next phase of growth.

With a clear road map for the year ahead, we're confident in our ability to continue delivering differentiated value and growth for our stakeholders. Now I'll turn the call back to the operator to take your questions.

Hi, thanks very much. You're fourth on the list today, I apologize if I'm going to try something different.

I don't know, why not, right? I feel like you and others have put up good performance, you have a lot of diversification, you're raising capital, the institutional channel is unbothered, and your stocks fall like rocks because people think it's looking in the rear view on particularly direct lending.

It must be that they don't believe the performance will sustain and that the stats that you've given can't hold up. Do you think there are either any actions to take by you and the industry to solidify belief and confidence on the direct lending side, and/or maybe you could talk about what the process is of valuing the portfolio and coming up with performance?

Because I'm finding it hard to believe you just pick numbers out of a hat. Maybe bring that side to life if there are no actions to take.

Because I appreciate that you're doing everything else that you can. Thanks.

Good question, Glenn. I think just to start with maybe the back half of your question, and then maybe kind of coming back around to the front part of your question with respect to sort of the performance and then how it plays out with respect to how it affects growth, or how it affects our performance.

From our perspective, I think the market is well familiar with our franchise as being directed and focused at the lower-middle market, and the lower-middle market is fundamentally different than the upper-middle market. We can talk about the upper-middle market if you want to, but the lower-middle market is fundamentally different in that it is also a sponsor-based business in terms of the companies that we're financing.

We're doing that as generally the only lender, and in that process also have a different dynamic with respect to the terms with which we lend. I think that, again importantly, we're not competing against the BSL market.

It's unlike the upper-middle market where direct lenders are actively competing against the banks, and it's a race to the bottom with respect to terms, spreads, covenants, etc. That's not the case in the space that we're lending in.

I think as the data suggests, our coverage ratios are generally higher, our loans are not picking, our spreads are generally higher, and we have a discipline of always applying at least two financial covenants to our loans within the Twin Brook franchise. We also control the revolver.

One of the things that gives us, going to your question of how do we monitor performance and how do we value these loans, is that we have a very unusual window, frankly, into what's going on with our borrowers and the underlying performance dynamics. For instance, if you are watching the draw of revolvers, that's a very good leading indicator of credit quality within the lower-middle market, and essentially allows us a seat at the table with the sponsors, with our borrowers, to understand what's exactly happening inside these companies.

It gives us a very kind of tactile feel with respect to what's happening across our portfolio. As a result of that, our ability to establish, like all lenders should, establishing watch lists to understand how companies are performing, where we need to spend more time, where we're paying attention, etc., where we're engaging with our sponsors, it gives us a much more tactile feel for that.

In terms of our ability to value our portfolio and really be in touch with performance, I think it is quite enhanced as a result of that, relative to what you might have if you were financing, let's say, a much bigger buyout, as an example, where it's a cov-lite loan, and essentially you don't have any of those similar types of controls. There is a difference.

I think that hopefully the market can draw some comfort from the fact that we're very in touch with our borrower base. In addition to that, I think we've said before that about half of our originations have been add-ons to our existing portfolio.

It's companies that we know, we've underwritten, we're closely in touch with, we're working with the sponsors. Those add-ons essentially they're coming directly to us and working on a one-on-one basis to structure whatever the amendments might be, to structure whatever the expansion of the facilities might be, and we also get paid whenever we do that, as well.

Hopefully that provides some clarity as relates to how we think about valuing the portfolio. It's a very rigorous process, and it gets a lot of focus and a lot of attention.

On the issue of kind of the sort of direct lending space more broadly speaking, and how the market is sort of reacting right now, I think maybe in terms of how will we sort of track and what will performance look like over time? I think we're only going to know over time, okay?

That's just the nature of sort of the lending markets. I think, as the lending markets, in order to maintain performance, the key issue obviously is avoiding capital loss.

The key issue is avoiding capital loss and managing, to the extent you can, your exposures. We're only going to know that obviously over time as things evolve.

What you have seen in the upper-middle market is you have seen a move toward amendments and liability management exercises, LMEs, of a reasonably significant increase in certain borrowers picking, and so I think it's going to play out over time in terms of sort of underlying company performance, and we'll see. I think that with respect to how it impacts also our business in terms of flows, I think that's another important dynamic, because the BDC world obviously is sort of consistently in the market raising capital, confidence is a very important thing, both in terms of inflows as well as outflows, right?

In terms of the redemption cycle, and then are people still going to be allocating as a result of being nervous or scared? I think that for T-CAP, just as I think I mentioned in my comments, but just to give you an idea, we've had essentially quarterly subscriptions going back to 2024 that have essentially been increasing every quarter, and we've had very, very low redemption requests.

That's obviously not the same necessarily across the entire market, and so I think that the other thing to I think consider is sort of where the sourcing of capital and where capital is coming from, and will it slow down the growth of the lending markets, the direct lending markets overall. I think wealth markets, retail markets, it's not surprising that people get nervous, and either want to lower their exposure to the sector, or just slow down their allocations to the sector.

We're not experiencing that within our business at this point, because of the strong performance. What we're actually seeing is we're seeing some level of movement of capital, both from the wealth market as well as institutionally, into this part of the market, the lower-middle market, to diversify their exposures because of these characteristics that I described.

I don't know, that's a little bit of a framing if that's helpful.

Hey, Glenn. Jim Coulter here.

To your first question on what we can do, it's been my experience, and I'm sure yours, that over time, when the market gets happy or worried, it tends to move things together. The second step is usually differentiation, understanding where there are differences.

I think at this moment, it's not really so much software or no software, it's which software. Trying to help that understanding.

The second point I would look at is LP flows. You can assume that issues around valuation and momentum are well understood in the LP market as they're doing work on new funds.

As Jack said, you see a very substantial gap in our fundraising versus the market. I think you can assume that these issues have been thought about in the LP community for a while, and watch the LP flows as a way of kind of getting some comfort on that.

Hi, good morning, and thank you for taking the question. Was wondering if you could unpack a little bit more the pickup in transaction fees in the quarter.

I think Jack, during your prepared remarks, you talked about on the fundraising side, you expect to see things sort of structurally step up. It looks like that's kind of the direction of travel there as well.

You've got growing dry powder, feels like the deployment activity is really picking up. It also looked like in the quarter, your transaction fees relative to deployment were a little bit higher than average.

I know things like monetization and transaction fees are hard to forecast even just a couple quarters out, but just given this step-up and maybe kind of your line of sight, how should we be thinking about revenues there for 2026? Thank you.

Thanks for the question. Good question.

Look, we've been talking for several years now about the efforts we've been undertaking to broaden and grow our capital markets business, and our view that that would be an outsized grower for us. It's obviously, as you point out, going to be a bit lumpy, but as I pointed out in my remarks, the growth that we're seeing is really driven by the growth of deployment, but also the broadening out of this business across the entire firm.

If you look back three, four years ago, it was very TPG Capital-centric, and now it's much more diversified. To give you a little more color behind Q4, the transaction fees that we recorded in Q4 were across 26 different transactions.

Now, of course, they were a little concentrated toward the biggest, but 26 different transactions broadly spread across the Impact platform, the Capital platform, the Growth platform, the Credit platform. I would say that growth across the firm and the growth of capital markets fees in new businesses, we're only in the beginning innings of that.

While it will be lumpy, and while the fourth quarter was above trend, we continue to view capital markets as a long-term growth opportunity for us.

Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question.

Maybe just following up on that, how has the baseline of your capital markets capabilities changed over the last year? Again, it's going to be volatile, we get that, but is there a way to sort of help us figure out how what you've invested in has actually grown and should translate into revenue, all else being equal?

Then if we look out another year, how should we expect that baseline to have changed a year from now? Does question make sense?

Thanks, Ken. I'll start on that.

If you look at what we've done to grow the business, I would start with our team, because in order to be delivering capital markets services across our portfolio in a way where management teams want to hire us to drive their capital structure evolutions, we need to have smart people engaging with our portfolio companies, engaging with our deal teams in greater numbers across businesses, and we've done that. I think over the past two or three years, we've more than doubled our capital markets team.

We're actively engaging across all of these portfolios and looking for opportunities to help our management teams drive capital structure optimization, drive efficient exits, that kind of thing. There's no good way to model this other than in the private equity businesses, there should be a correlation between capital deployment and capital markets fees.

There's also a second prong, which is kind of regular-way balance sheet optimization of existing deals. The sources of income in capital markets in private equity-oriented businesses will be both funding new deals and financing and refinancing existing portfolio company balance sheets to optimize them.

I guess the third piece would be add-on acquisitions for existing companies, which would usually have equity capital deployment associated with them. On the credit side, it'll be different across different credit businesses, but kind of flows of deployment should also be probably the most important metric to measure capital markets opportunity.

Hopefully that helps.

Hey, good afternoon. Thank you for taking the question as well.

When we think about the credit business at TPG, you guys have done a really sizable build-out there over the last year, year and a half. Lots of fundraising.

Maybe talk a little bit about the outlook for net deployment across various verticals within credit as a source of management fee growth for TPG into 2026.

Thanks, Alex. Look, I think that obviously there's been an important relationship between capital formation and putting ourselves in a position where we can do more.

As the credit business can be also quite scalable as it relates to identifying and sourcing transactions and the size of those transactions, and how much of it we can deploy into it ourselves versus how much of it we're syndicating away to other participants in the market. Our underlying base has gone up and grown a lot as a result of the pools of capital that we're now investing.

I think the other related opportunity for us in terms of deployment across our business is as a result of the coming together of TPG and Angelo Gordon, and the collaboration and the synergies that we're seeing between our equity franchise and our credit franchise. I think the breadth of our sourcing capability, our relationships with companies, our relationships with sponsors, the ability to do really interesting things at scale, particularly in our Credit Solutions franchise, as an example, I think is going to provide us with a continued upward trend, or perhaps even a step function in terms of sort of opportunities for us.

On the back of raising a meaningfully larger fund there, we're going to have an opportunity to deploy a lot more capital. On the structured credit side, which I think obviously has a lot of tailwinds with respect to private capital financing that part of the market, whether it's IG ABF or the residential mortgage market, consumer finance, etc., we're seeing a big step function in terms of deployment there.

Obviously just to give you sort of an idea, in structured credit from 2023 to '24 to '25, we've seen almost a tripling of our deployment there to just under $10 billion of capital in 2025. Other parts of the business I think are experiencing similar growth.

I think the introduction of ADL for us, which is going to attack borrowers that we know, where we have a competitive advantage, I think that's going to give us an opportunity to deploy capital more aggressively and in bigger size. Then, to the point we were just talking about on the capital markets side, the development and evolution of our broker-dealer and the capital markets opportunity, capital markets is not only a financing enabler and a syndication function, it's also a sourcing function as well.

We're seeing that more and more. If you look at our capital markets revenues, the amount of capital markets revenue now coming out of our credit business on a relative basis is still modest.

There's a lot of upside there as well for us. I think that we're set up well with scaling pools of capital, the insurance capital that's coming in, the opportunity set that that's going to give us where we have clear visibility on capital coming at us and our ability to build our product set there, and just do it at scale.

It's a very scalable market, whether it's resi mortgages, whether it's consumer credit, or other structured finance opportunities for companies. It's a very scalable market.

I'll say good morning because I think you're on the West Coast, but hope you're all doing well. I had a follow-up to Glenn's question, which I thought was a good one, but I wanted to ask it on the software equity book, not the debt book.

I think you pointed out not all software companies are created equal, but I was hoping you could walk us through some of the qualities of your software buyout and growth books that make you feel more comfortable. What type of companies have you generally avoided, and what type of companies do you own that you think are not impacted at all from AI disruptions?

Hey Craig, this is Nehal Raj. Great questions.

Let me start by saying we've got a very informed perspective on this topic, having invested in the software space for over 20 years, the AI space for over a decade. This experience has really served us well over lots of tech transitions, the on-premise to cloud transition, GFC, COVID.

We navigated all those transitions with strong returns and low loss ratios. All right, we'd expect the same with respect to AI.

As Jon mentioned in his remarks, we've identified a number of characteristics that we believe will largely determine AI winners from AI losers, where there's opportunity and where there's threat for software companies. To your question, let me double-click a bit on where we're seeing opportunities first, both in the market and in our portfolio.

The first area is vertical market software. Vertical market companies tend to reside on a lot of proprietary data that's generated over decades.

This data is typically managed in a closed system, third-party AI can't access this data, and it can really only be monetized by internally developed AI, which works to the benefit of these companies. I'll give you an example maybe to bring it to light.

In our TPG Capital portfolio, we own a company called Lyric. Lyric processes the majority of medical claims in the U.S., and over a period of decades has built up a very, very unique data set.

This data is not available to third-party AI firms, and that makes Lyric really uniquely positioned to apply AI to this data set to create new value for its customers. We're the control owners of Lyric, we've been really driving new AI products under our ownership, and this has actually resulted in a significant acceleration in the revenue and revenue growth of this company.

I'll give you one other example to the positive, which is in cyber security. Many of these companies stand to benefit and be net beneficiaries of AI adoption.

Another example to bring this to light, also in our TPG Capital portfolio, is a company called Delinea. Delinea is a provider of identity-based cyber security for enterprises, and what its core functionality does is it determines and manages the level of access that an employee could have to corporate systems and corporate data.

Now, what's really interesting is as AI agents proliferate, they need identity and access, too. What we're seeing in our business is net new demand for Delinea's products and new revenue growth opportunities that are coming out of this.

These are just a few examples of both spaces and companies, but this is the framework that's really guided our investing in the space over the last several years. As a result, the vast, vast majority of our software portfolio falls into these categories where we think AI is going to be a strong tailwind and benefit to our companies.

I'll mention a little bit on the areas that have the potential to be more impacted, also to answer that part of your question. I would say, in general, these would be horizontal applications, not vertical.

Horizontal applications that are not systems of record, and maybe sit on top of other systems of record. Those are much more prone to AI-based disruption.

I'd also say infrastructure-related software that may not be supporting new AI technology architectures. Those are also more at risk.

Our overall level of exposure and investment, because of this framework that we've been using over the last several years, is pretty minimal to these areas of AI risk.

Great. Maybe just kind of build on the last question, another question for Nehal here.

To bring color on the different types of exposure and kind of breaking that down for us, could you maybe also break down a little bit more about the funds, and what is kind of the vintage mix here of the software investments, and specifically how much of the exposure would be from that 2021 cohort? Then I'd love your thoughts on how to think about the broader software industry here.

How does this potentially play out in terms of disruption? When would that ultimately come through in terms of maybe timing here, just given some of these contracts have a bit of a long life to them?

When do we start to really see some of this come through?

Let me start by maybe framing a little bit our last five or six years of software investment and realization activity. In that 2020 to 2022 period, we were big-time net sellers in our software portfolio.

Part of that was due to the valuation environment at that time. Part of it was due to the value that we'd already created in our portfolio companies.

I remember very distinctly, during that time period, we exited every one of our software companies in TPG VII and before, if you're looking at our fund vintages. Those funds have been ex-software for the better part of five years as a result of that activity.

That means most of our software investment activity really has resided in funds VIII, IX, and now X. The benefit of that is we've had pretty good visibility into what's happening in AI over that time period.

I think where you will see more risk is in companies that were underwritten 2018, 2019, 2020, prior to the advent of generative AI. Those vintages are more susceptible to risk and disruption.

The great part about our setup is having exited those companies, we were able to underwrite with the knowledge of what's happening in generative AI, and I think have generally adhered to this framework that I mentioned earlier. I would also maybe answer the second part of your question in terms of when does the disruption play out.

I understand your point about long contracts, but where there is disruption, I think it's starting to become evident in results. If you think about a CIO's budget in an enterprise, it's being inundated with requests for AI-oriented purchases and expenditures.

As a result, some tough choices are having to be made. If you're spending more on AI, what are you spending less of to stay within your budget?

That's really creating, already, winners and losers. Now, some of that is maybe more in bookings than revenue, but because we are control investors, we have the opportunity to really look under the hood of the companies that we're investing in, and we can look at leading indicators, we can look at retention rates, we can look at detail that you may not get if you're just a lender.

That's giving us really good insight as to where winners and losers are residing in this market. I would answer your question, the disruption, when it is happening, is happening now.

Oh, hi. Thanks for taking the question.

We snuck in right under the wire here. Was curious.

It looked like the fee rate, adjusting for catch-up fees, ticked down quarter-over-quarter. Can you speak to maybe what drove that, and how we should be thinking about the fee rate going forward, whether there are any funds coming off fee holidays and whatnot?

Yeah. Hey, it's Jack.

Obviously fee rates are blended across lots of different funds with different fee structures, or kind of have lots of things impacting them. I would tell you that the biggest thing impacting at the highest level our firm-wide average fee rate is the mix of where we're investing.

Because if you think about some of the businesses we've been growing most actively, credit, some new areas of credit like investment-grade ABF, those generally have lower fee rates than our traditional private equity business. You'll see that mix drive fee rate just blended across the businesses.

If you look at each fund one at a time, each business line, we're not seeing material fee rate degradation in any one business. It's more a question of the mix.

The other thing that was going on in the fourth quarter is we saw a step-down in TPG IX. If you simply calculate, for example, the average fee rate in the TPG Capital or private equity business, we had our FAUM step down in the fourth quarter, while we activated Fund X in the third quarter.

The average fee rate in our Capital business was a little elevated in the third quarter because we were charging fees on both of those funds, and that one, TPG X, which is big, it was a $3 billion step-down, occurred in Q4. That may be what you're seeing.

Hi, hope you can hear me. I've got a question on real estate, please.

Since that's a big part of your fundraising for 2026, I was just wondering if you could talk a bit more about the confidence around that, in particular in the context of maybe performance in the broader real estate market, and maybe the outlook still being soft. How confident are you around fundraising in real estate?

Thank you.

Sure. Look, we feel great about the outlook for our real estate franchise and for this fundraising cycle.

I think we have a fair amount of confidence based on the strong performance that we have had. Obviously, you can see our value creation numbers, which have been very, very strong and, frankly, industry-leading.

Elements of our franchise that I think that our investors are I think quite interested in, particularly when you look at what's going on in various markets and the return opportunities that people are looking at. Real estate obviously has gone through a pretty tough run over the last number of years, and I think we've been consistently talking about this on our calls and in our communication that we've seen a distinct change in terms of the opportunity set on the real estate side.

For us, I think in terms of our deployment and taking advantage of those opportunities, I think for us it started, frankly, more than a year ago, where we started to see as a result of stress in the real estate community opportunities to acquire assets that I think we felt were very defensible and had a lot of upside. If you look at the deployment opportunity and where we've taken advantage of those opportunities, it's obviously ticked up over the course of 2025 in a meaningful way.

We feel like what we're coming to market with in 2026 is a good, diverse set of opportunities for our LPs to evaluate. Obviously, we've been in dialogue with our LPs about the fundraising cycle and about the real estate opportunity more broadly.

I think that there is more interest from the LP community today in real estate than I think we've seen in several years. I think we go into this with a lot of enthusiasm about this fundraising cycle, our ability to raise capital, and I think relative to what we expect fund over fund, we do expect growth on a fund-over-fund basis in all of these strategies.

We're pretty excited about it. Arnaud,

I would just add, it's Jack, that the biggest tentpole in real estate for us this year is going to be the TREP business. As Jon indicated, with our institutional LPs, we're already in different stages of dialogue and seeing very strong demand.

The other thing I would say is that's a business where we've never offered that product to the high-net-worth market, and we have one of our most strategic channel partners there, despite the fact that demand is moving more toward the evergreen market, who believes that our performance in that TREP business is so strong they want to offer that closed-end fund to their system, and we expect material take-up there.

Great, thanks. Thanks so much for squeezing me in.

Maybe just to go back to the connection between the deployment and transaction fees, and obviously you've been pretty clear that the deployment opportunities broadly across the platform continue to improve as we move into 2026, and that structurally augurs well for the transaction fees. Just it's been improving throughout 2025 sequentially every quarter, and obviously we have a major step-up here in 4Q.

Appreciate that was a broad-based, good mix in 4Q and lumpy, but was there a vast improvement from 3Q to 4Q in the structure of what you did in terms of the teams in place? Then maybe another way to look at this would be if we were to quarterize or annualize that number in 4Q, which I know is unbelievably lumpy, what kind of upside would there be to the FRE margin for '26 in that type of scenario?

I'll just start, and then Jack will add in. I don't think there was anything that was structurally different about what we're doing other than what Jack described earlier.

Just I think it's important that you understand sort of the way we execute on this, which is that we feel it's very important to have capital markets capability that essentially is embedded in each of these different businesses, because being early in the transaction cycle, being involved in the financing discussions and structuring deals early in the transaction cycle is very important, because you're gaining the confidence of your management teams, etc., and in terms of the value add that we bring to bear as a result of being inside of these companies, really understanding them and being able to position the companies the best we can with respect to structuring financing around it and bringing capital to bear, attracting capital to it. This is something that Jack mentioned before, that we've consistently built out over the course of time across our businesses.

We're continuing to do that. Of course, I think transaction and financing revenue is going to be correlated to deployment and transactional activity.

There's no question about that. I think there'll be other overlaying factors, depending upon sort of where other capital is coming from.

I think that it will continue to be correlated to that. However, structurally, if you think about sort of what is the baseline embedded structural opportunity, the structural opportunity continues to go up for us as we think about how we're doing this.

Of course, as I mentioned before, on the credit side, as we continue to build our credit platform and embed capital markets capability and our broker-dealer capabilities in that business, I think that's a structural upside for us in terms of something that I think we'll realize over the next couple of years. Think of it that way.

I think that if you looked at the capital markets revenue flow, and you went back from 2024 through where we are today, if you try to smooth the line, you can almost look at a progression on a quarter-by-quarter basis of the expansion of the opportunity set for us, and kind of develop a little bit of a baseline that way, because you're right, there will be sort of lumpy, chunky opportunities like we saw in the fourth quarter.

The only thing I'd add to that, Brian, is one factor that determines the revenue opportunity in any given deal is how the capital structure is put in place. What I mean by that is, simplistically, if you think either broadly syndicated loan that's underwritten and distributed to the marketplace or a private lending, a direct lending solution, in a broadly syndicated loan, our participation will be a percentage of the total fee opportunity.

In a directly placed capital structure, we are usually doing all of the work and placing the entire capital structure. It did so happen that in the fourth quarter, it wasn't just one deal.

There were a number of larger transactions that closed in the quarter where the deal was funded with a private capital structure, and our team did exceptional work to design those capital structures. That will also determine a little bit of the lumpiness.

Now, on your margin question, capital markets revenue is a very high-contribution-margin business. I would think about 85% to 90% contribution margin on incremental revenue.

If we have very strong capital markets quarters like we had in Q4, that's what drove the FRE margin up in Q4.

Great, thanks for squeezing me in here. Just a question on the wealth channel.

It seems T-POP is off to a good, strong start. I was hoping you could elaborate on some of the initiatives and steps you're going to be taking across the wealth channel here in '26 to accelerate growth across the existing vehicles, and more broadly, how you're thinking about scope for new product development, vehicles, potential partnerships to bring more of what you do to the private wealth channel and to ease point of access for retail?

Yep, good question, Mike. We've been spending a lot of time on that.

Job one for us, as we started down this path several years ago, was we've got to get T-POP right. This has got to work well.

It's got to be viewed as a high-quality product. It has to help us build our brand much more broadly in the channel than we had in the past, just placing one closed-end fund at a time.

I would say we're off to a fantastic start there. T-POP, on the platforms that we are on, we are one of the top, and in some cases the top-performing and top capital-raising private equity evergreen product on the shelf.

Step one is continue that expansion, and continue to use this premier product to broaden our brand awareness and our active engagement with financial advisors across more platforms. That will lead to accelerated growth in T-POP this year.

I think we talked about the growth rate we had this past year. I would expect T-POP to more than double this year, and that will be the result of continuing to penetrate existing channel partners.

As I mentioned in my prepared remarks, we have several additional channel partners who have already selected T-POP, in many cases in competition with every other private equity evergreen product out there, as one to add to their shelf this year. Expanding on existing platforms, growing across new platforms, on both T-POP and T-CAP, by the way.

We talked about flows in T-CAP. We expect T-CAP to continue to grow as a very sizable direct lending option in the private wealth market.

That's step one. Step two is expanding our product set, as you talked about.

We are actively working on both a multi-strategy credit interval fund to complement T-CAP in a lot of ways. Think about that as the T-POP of credit for us, effectively investing across all of our different credit businesses in Angelo Gordon.

Then the next product is a non-traded REIT. As Jon indicated, we are seeing a resumption of real interest in real estate, not just in institutional LP land, but also among high-net-worth channel partners.

We have a couple of our biggest channel partners who are eager to partner with us on a non-traded REIT that reflects everything we do in real estate without an older portfolio, with a newly seated portfolio. Working on both of those.

The final piece I would say is the market is really moving in part toward what I would call bundled solutions that require partnerships with partners more on the liquid side, the public side of the market. Obviously, a couple of our peers have announced those.

We have very active discussions going on with interesting partners who I think will open up more market opportunity, more mass affluent opportunity, and eventually the 401(k) market.

Great. Thank you.

Thank you all for joining us today. We know it's an extremely busy earnings day, we appreciate you choosing to spend time with us.

If you have any questions, as always, feel free to follow up with the Investor Relations team. Otherwise, we'll look forward to speaking with you again next quarter.