Good morning, and thank you for joining us today. Ladder had a strong second quarter, with robust origination activity and continued earnings growth.

We generated distributable earnings of $30.8 million, or 24 cents per share, with modest adjusted leverage of 2.3 times. Ladder's business model is performing well, yet our stock still trades at a meaningful discount to book value, a value we feel confident in and one that has remained stable throughout the cycle.

We have three levers that should help narrow that discount over time. Combined with a dividend yield of over 9%, closing that gap would put a total return potential above 30% from here.

First, continued rotation into higher-yielding loans builds earnings power. Our investment grade balance sheet gives us the liquidity and financial flexibility to continue rotating capital into loans without compromising on credit, and our stable book value reflects that discipline.

Second, generating gains from sales across our multi-cylinder strategy—from securities, real estate, and conduit loans—continues to be part of our playbook and a source of earnings we don't think is fully reflected in our valuation today. Third, with our stock price currently trading below book value, every share we repurchase adds to book value per share, a lever we'll use opportunistically alongside loan growth.

I'll explain how you're already seeing progress in each of these areas. Rotating into loans: year-to-date, we have originated $1.2 billion in new loans, with our loan portfolio growing 75% over the trailing 12 months.

Balance sheet loans now make up approximately 50% of total assets, and we expect that share to continue to climb. 85% of our loan portfolio has been originated in the past 2 years at conservative loan-to-values on reset basises, resulting in recently underwritten loans, not a legacy book carried at peak-cycle values.

That rotation is showing up in the results. Our net interest margin has trended higher year-over-year as we've rotated out of lower-yielding securities and replaced legacy loans with these new, recently originated ones, even as all-in rates on new originations have come down.

In the second quarter, we made over $800 million of new investments: over $550 million in new loans at a weighted average yield of 7.2%, and $333 million in AAA investment grade rated securities at a weighted average yield of 5.15%. These investments are predominantly floating rate, while our liability structure is largely fixed rate, higher rates from here should benefit earnings.

Every dollar we rotate from securities yielding approximately 5% into floating rate first mortgages yielding over 7% picks up about 200 basis points of income on that capital, which would flow directly through to earnings. Notably, our second-quarter loan originations included a $268 million loan for the acquisition of a Class A office and retail building in Midtown Manhattan, along with a $10 million, or 6%, equity co-investment in the property.

The loan was made at a 62% loan-to-cost on a reset basis to a repeat borrower. Origination momentum has continued into the third quarter, with an active pipeline of approximately $500 million of new loans under application and in closing.

With payoffs expected to stay light through year-end, we expect net portfolio growth to build each quarter for the remainder of 2026. Overall transaction volume across the market has picked up, broadening our opportunity set as a lender, and we continue to canvas for the best risk-adjusted returns.

Our primary focus remains middle market, income-producing collateral, mainly multifamily and industrial. On office, to be clear, we're not making a directional bet on the sector, but in select markets, we're finding compelling opportunities where leasing momentum has returned and basis has reset sharply.

We favor cities with low crime rates and a return to in-person work, and we underwrite each of these loans on its own reset basis, not on a view of office broadly. Supplementing carry with gains: gains from our multi-cylinder business strategy—securities sales, real estate, and conduit—can be lumpy from quarter to quarter, but they've been a consistent contributor to earnings by design since our founding.

Because of that consistency, Ladder's better evaluated year-over-year rather than quarter-to-quarter, a distinction we believe gets lost in how our stock is valued today. Our $1.9 billion securities portfolio, representing 33% of total assets, is predominantly AAA-rated and has served as a primary source of capital as our loan origination activity accelerates.

During the quarter, we reduced our securities portfolio with net sales producing $1.8 million in gains. As we continue to fund new loans, we expect the securities portfolio's share of total assets to contract further, with the pace driven by loan origination activity, not a retreat from securities as an asset class.

Our $1 billion real estate portfolio generated $18 million of net operating income in the second quarter. We also realized a $1.7 million gain to distributable earnings tied to a $13 million distribution from a cash-out refinancing of a joint venture equity investment we made in a Manhattan office property in 2024.

Over the course of our ownership, property occupancy increased 52% to 94%, with NOI increasing over 200% from acquisition—another example of unlocking value above our cost basis in select assets. This is not unique to one property.

Across our real estate portfolio, we carry several assets below the value we would expect to realize, and we anticipate capturing that value as we selectively monetize positions over time, though the timing of any given sale is never guaranteed. Overall, we realized approximately $4.1 million of gains this quarter across all three of our cylinders: $1.8 million from securities sales, $1.7 million from our real estate equity, and $600,000 from our conduit business.

These gains are not always sizable individually, but this is our multi-cylinder business model working the way it's supposed to: earnings support that builds over the year rather than in any single quarter. Share repurchases: as Paul will discuss, we continue to repurchase stock at a discount to book value this quarter.

Stock repurchases remain one of the more accretive uses of capital available to us today, increasing book value with every share repurchased at today's market price. In closing, we can't control our stock price, but we can control many of the inputs that help drive it.

An investment grade capital structure and rising, higher-quality earnings should attract a broader base of investors, including equity REIT holders, supporting the kind of stock performance that would move us towards that 30+% total return, where shareholders are paid a yield of over 9% in the meantime. We've built a strong track record earning the confidence of a new core base of investment grade bondholders.

When we issued our inaugural investment grade bond, we effectively refreshed our fixed income investor base, attracting high-quality institutional buyers who bought the Ladder story and drove our bond spreads materially tighter. Now we're turning that same attention and effort to the equity side.

Over the second half of the year, we plan on taking our story directly to current and prospective shareholders, widening the audience and, candidly, going to work on our stock. Looking ahead, our priorities remain unchanged: originate high-quality investments across loans, securities, and real estate, with a particular focus on our loan segment, while maintaining the credit discipline that has always defined Ladder.

Management and the board remain Ladder's largest shareholder group, which keeps our incentives squarely aligned with yours: protecting principal, delivering an attractive return on equity, and building long-term value for every shareholder alongside us. With that, I'll turn the call over to Paul.

Thank you, Pamela. Good morning.

During the second quarter, Ladder generated distributable earnings of $30.8 million, or 24 cents per share. Our investment grade balance sheet continues to be in a position of strength, powering our multi-cylinder strategy.

We maintain modest leverage and a highly resilient unsecured capital structure, with unsecured debt representing 67% of our total debt at an attractive cost of capital. As of quarter-end, our adjusted leverage ratio was 2.3 times, and we maintained robust liquidity of $1.1 billion, including same-day capacity in our unsecured revolver and cash.

During the second quarter, we fully drew down the $275 million unsecured term loan we closed in the first quarter, which is priced at 140 basis points over SOFR. Alongside this facility, our $1.25 billion unsecured corporate revolver continues to be a valuable asset, allowing for funding flexibility with same-day liquidity at SOFR plus 125 basis points, driving our ability to execute our capital deployment strategy.

Our unencumbered asset pool represented 73% of total assets as of June 30th. 85% of this pool is comprised of first mortgage loans, investment grade securities, and unrestricted cash.

These highly liquid, senior secured unencumbered assets do more than expand our liquidity; they provide a high-caliber asset base that directly supports our unsecured liability structure. Subsequent to quarter-end, S&P revised their outlook on Ladder to positive, one step closer to investment grade and the second positive rating action S&P has taken on Ladder this year, following their upgrade to BB+ in January.

The action is reflective of Ladder's strengthening balance sheet and track record of disciplined leverage, sound credit management, and durable, predominantly unsecured funding profile. An upgrade to investment grade from S&P would bring Ladder's credit rating in line with Moody's and Fitch, where we are already investment grade.

We'd like to thank the team at S&P for their diligence and partnership throughout this process, and we look forward to continuing to build on that relationship. As of June 30th, Ladder's undepreciated book value per share was $13.44, which is net of 37 cents per share of CECL reserve established.

In the second quarter, we repurchased $8 million of common stock, or 800,000 shares, at a weighted average share price of $10.03 per share, or 25% discount to book value. Year-to-date in 2026, we have repurchased $21 million of our common stock, or 2.1 million shares, at a weighted average share price of $10.10 per share.

As of June 30th, $92 million remains outstanding on our stock repurchase program. Overall, we continue to believe in our book value, and we will seek to continue to opportunistically utilize our buyback program while our stock is trading at a meaningful discount.

In the second quarter, we declared a 23 cents per share dividend, which was paid on July 15th, 2026. Over time, continued rotation of capital into our loan segment, along with the earnings power of our multi-cylinder strategy, should be a tailwind to dividend coverage.

Turning to credit quality: in the second quarter, we added one loan to nonaccrual status, collateralized by an office asset in Minneapolis, Minnesota, with a carrying value of $13.4 million. We anticipate resolution of this loan by the fourth quarter.

As of June 30th, our CECL reserve remained steady at $47 million, or 37 cents per share. We continue to believe this reserve level is sufficient to cover potential losses across our loan portfolio.

During the quarter, we resolved one loan through foreclosure: an $8 million loan collateralized by an office property in Birmingham, Alabama, that we now own at $30 per square foot. Our plan is to stabilize this asset and maximize value for a potential sale in the future.

As of June 30th, our securities portfolio totaled $1.9 billion, with a weighted average yield of 5.19%. Notably, 99% of the portfolio is investment grade, and 96% was AAA-rated, with a weighted average duration of approximately 3 years, underscoring its high credit quality and overall liquidity.

As of quarter-end, approximately 50%, or $925 million, of our securities portfolio remained unencumbered, complimenting our $1.1 billion of same-day liquidity. We believe this combined firepower reinforces the strength of our balance sheet and positions Ladder to organically fund loan originations to drive future earnings growth.

Our $1 billion real estate segment continued to generate stable net operating income in the second quarter. The portfolio includes 149 net lease properties comprised primarily of investment grade credits, committed to long-term leases with an average remaining lease term of 6.2 years.

For further details of our second quarter 2026 operating results, please refer to our earnings supplement and our investor presentation, both available on our website, as well as our quarterly report on Form 10-Q, which we expect to file in the coming days. With that, I'll let Brian take it from here.

Thanks, Paul. Given the quarter was more or less as expected, I won't focus too much on the numbers Paul and Pamela gave you, other than to reinforce how our business plan is unfolding right on schedule.

Our loan portfolio is continuing to show steady growth funded by our numerous options of unsecured liabilities and the sale and paydowns of unencumbered securities as we allocate more capital each quarter to higher-yielding products. We expect this rotational pattern into higher-yielding first mortgage loans to continue through year-end, and we expect to issue additional unsecured corporate debt to refinance our 4.25% bonds maturing in early 2027.

I'd note that we don't have to issue more debt given our $1.25 billion undrawn corporate revolver, but we do expect to issue new debt over the next 6 months when an attractive window opens for issuance. We were pleased to hear that S&P had moved Ladder to positive outlook recently and hope that our next bond issuance will be rated investment grade by three rating agencies.

We've spent a lot of time and effort on our liability complex over the years, and it's very rewarding to see benefits that come from our consistent and conservative approach towards liquidity, leverage, and most importantly, credit. When the office sector began to alarm investors after the pandemic, we highlighted our top five exposures in an earnings call in the fourth quarter of 2022.

At the time, our largest equity exposure to office were two similarly sized portfolios: one in Florida, one in Virginia, totaling $242 million. The Virginia portfolio has since been sold at our basis, and we anticipate selling the Florida portfolio above our current basis before year-end.

We also had three mortgage loans secured by office properties: one in Alabama for $66 million, which has since paid off in full, and two in Florida totaling approximately $326 million. Of that, a $215 million mortgage on a Miami office building paid off in full in the second quarter of this year, and the remaining loan was paid down by approximately $30 million a while ago from $110 million to $80 million today, where we still carry it.

We expect this loan to pay off by year-end also. In a sector that delivered huge losses in many companies we competed with, we now look reasonably likely to benefit from a full return of capital on our five largest office exposures as depicted 4 years ago.

There are no guarantees this will go as planned, but it's the base-case scenario we are operating under. We seem to have fared better than most over this difficult time period, and this is why we have had lower charge-offs and have maintained a fairly steady book value for our share price.

Our debt complex is now in place to safely support our growing asset base, and we are very pleased with the reception bond investors welcomed us with as we issued our first investment grade corporate bond last summer. In short, they understood our conservative approach towards investing in commercial real estate, but now we have to turn our full attention to our stock price that seemingly reflects none of the differentiated features of our company.

These features include, but are not limited to: 1, an internally managed structure; 2, our middle market lending preferences; 3, our conservative use of leverage; 4, our access to many low-cost options to finance our businesses; 5, our balanced approach to risk-reward relationships when allocating capital; 6, our stable book value and attractive quarterly cash dividend; and 7, an ownership structure where management and the board are among the largest shareholders of the company. We believe the equity markets incorrectly compare us to other commercial mortgage REITs based solely on what we own on the asset side of our balance sheet.

It seems that common ownership of various commercial real estate-related products is where that analysis ends. We think there's much more to comparative analysis than similar asset types, and we will now work tirelessly to broaden our investor base to include investors who generally invest in lower-yielding investment grade property REITs, regional banks, and T-bills.

We think our correct comp set should be chosen by how we finance our assets rather than by what assets we own. This is difficult, but let's remember that Ladder is the only investment grade commercial mortgage REIT in the United States, naturally we will need to market our company to investors that have not seen anything quite like us in a very long time.

We needed to get the liability side of Ladder squared away first, given how integral our differentiated financing methodology is to understanding the value of our shares over time. We're not looking to convert holders of non-investment grade commercial mortgage REITs with tenuously high dividends into owning our stock instead.

Rather, we're trying to convert holders of lower-yielding investment grade property REITs into our 9+% dividend-yielding investment grade company. We're also aiming to convert a small portion of record levels of cash and T-bills in money market funds into owning our nearly three times higher-yielding, but still conservative, commercial mortgage REIT that also happens to be the only investment grade mortgage REIT in the country.

We kick off this effort starting today, and I direct your attention to just one slide in our online investor presentation: Slide 5. This slide condenses my words into an easy-to-understand illustration, and I welcome comments regarding our approach to accessing investors who seek higher yields in a cash-heavy market with our one-of-a-kind vehicle.

We can now take some questions.

Hi, thank you taking the questions today, and congrats on the quarter. It seems like the rotation from securities into loan portfolio picked up this quarter, and if I'm reading slide 9 correctly, it seems like most of the securities sold came from 3 to 5-year duration.

I guess thinking about as that rotation continues through year-end, how do you go about selecting what securities to sell? Just trying to get a better understanding of why it might be longer duration.

Thank you. Hello?

[unclear] having troubles hearing.

All right, we hear you.

Apologies for the disconnect, but we're back.

You were here for the

question?

Yep, we can hear you.

All right, awesome. It seems like the shift from securities to the loan portfolio picked up this quarter, and it seems if I'm reading slide 9 correctly that most of that rotation came from longer-duration securities in the 3 to 5 years.

I was just wondering, how do you think about the selection of what securities to sell as you rotate that capital? Thank you.

Sure. This is Brian, by the way.

We generally just group them into what is the objective of the day. If the objective is simply to fund a new loan that we're originating and we need the cash for it, we'll generally sell something that is paid down, quite a bit, with a low factor because we've owned it for several years.

While it's quite safe, the instrument, it might be a 20% LTV across a pool of assets, it's going to pay off near term. Anything that looks like it's about to pay off is what we select first when we're just trying to generate cash to close loans.

Sometimes, especially when rates rise a little bit, spreads can tighten. We did see some attractive pricing too.

Everything we sold was a floater. When you say longer duration, it's very hard to make a lot of money on a floating rate AAA because it just doesn't swing around a lot in price.

We were able to sell quite a few at a gain of about a half a point, and that added, I think, $1.8 million to the quarter. The selection criteria is usually what's about to be cash first.

Secondly, what are we up as and maybe feel mispriced about that we might be selling at a high price. Then last, if we've never gotten to that, but if we ever got to it, we would then start taking larger positions to generate capital quickly.

The beauty of that AAA sale complex is that you get your cash 24 hours later.

Great. Thank you.

Then I guess, with that rotation, obviously, the 2 percentage points you pick up from 5% securities to 7% loans, I guess, could you help us quantify maybe the costs associated with that rotation just to get a better understanding of the process? Thank you.

I may be misunderstanding the question, but there is no cost to it, to my knowledge. We simply sell the securities, get cash, and then fund the loan.

For instance, in April, I believe we got paid off on $215 million in the Miami office loan, and I think 2 days later we made another loan for $268 million. I don't know what kind of costs you're talking about.

You mean breakage costs, or hedge costs?

No, I was thinking more of costs to originate that next loan. Obviously you're picking up the 2%, but in the meantime, as you originate the loan and put that money to work, I was thinking, how much does that cost you kind of maybe corporate overhead, origination costs that might eat into it in that quarter?

Given we have that large revolver that has same-day delivery on cash, we don't travel with a lot of cash overnight anymore. We also have such low leverage that the idea of a margin call would be pretty surprising, too, because half of the assets are unencumbered completely.

The opportunity cost, if you will, would be we come out of securities at 5%, we might stick it overnight into a money market fund at 3.75, and then whenever the loan closes. We usually sell those securities in tandem with loans closing.

They're not random events; they take place together.

Great. Thank you so much for taking the questions today.

Sure.

Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking the questions.

In the past, your team has cited concentration risk with respect to your origination decisions, including the origination year. Now that about, if I have my numbers right, 37% of your loan book has been originated this year and 85% across 2025 and 2026, how is that average vintage setup affecting your deployment plans for the back half of the year?

Thanks. Hi,

in very rough numbers, we try to set the company up to originate $400 to $500 million a quarter. We're not particularly concerned if we don't originate that much, nor are we concerned if we originate twice as much.

We're not going to experience a lot of paydowns after now. Most of our legacy loan portfolio has paid off.

I think we were experiencing some large payoff quarters which I'm sure you saw, and we were redeploying that capital, and sometimes that took a little while, but we're past that point now. I would say if we're going to fund additional loans, and we will, and that 85% that 50% of the inventory will climb over time into the loan book.

When we do that, we'll probably either access the corporate revolver that is undrawn, or else we'll just sell AAA securities. I think we have about $900 million of those with no leverage on them.

It's 24-hour turnaround for cash. I don't know if I'm answering you right there, but I think the message is that paydowns are slowing down dramatically, but not because of a credit reason, just because they got older, and they're hitting maturities.

Got it. No, that's very helpful, Brian.

Thank you. Then other one for me: during last quarter's call, you discussed how much borrower appetite can quickly shift due to either a change in rates or macro volatility.

With rates markedly up since then, and volatility still present obviously we've seen what's gone on the past couple days, how have you been seeing borrowers react both late in the second quarter and now that we're into the third quarter here? Thank you.

Higher rates will deter all but the most ardent borrowers that need to get something done. I think the first thing you'll see with the higher rates is there's actually an initial push to close loans, because those that are under application want to get them closed because they're afraid rates might move even higher.

After that, there's usually a gap and things slow down, and you'll see this in mortgage servicers and how the residential market works. Borrower appetite is very picky right now, it is a rather competitive environment, and, at least in our floating-rate book, our spreads have been rising.

If that sounds like I contradicted myself, but what we're doing now that we're getting more deployed, and we have less headroom to go on our maximum asset base that will optimize over time. As of now, we've kind of stiffened on price and also on credit conditions.

Whereas we might have been a little aggressively competing on any given multifamily loan a year ago, we're a lot less so now. We pretty much set our prices, and if borrowers want to close there, they will.

What we are seeing more of though, and I don't think it has anything to do with interest rates, is there's a lot of price discovery popping up as office buildings are being sold by lenders, either who had foreclosed or else who are selling the notes at a deep discount in cooperation with the next buyer and the old borrower. That's happening.

There seems to be this sense in the United States that the office market is recovering, and it is to some degree, but I would point out that it's really just two cities that are really doing well, and that's San Francisco and New York. I don't see any recovery whatsoever in Chicago, or Los Angeles, or Washington, D.C., where the government drives a lot of that business.

You do see a lot of activity in those cities, and what's happening is lenders on legacy assets are throwing in the towel, and they're finally just taking their medicine and taking the loss. You'll see a lot of prints, but I don't want you to think that's a lot of borrowing going on there.

It's usually very challenged assets that are going to take quite a while to stabilize. We're happy to do some of those, with the right party who can execute their business plan, but when it's a refinance of somebody who is already having a problem and he's had a loan for 5 years, I would not expect much to change in the next couple of years with the same owner.

I think the long story there is Ladder is getting fuller on its inventory, Ladder is charging more for a smaller amount of liquidity remaining to redeploy.

Great. Appreciate all the color.

That's all for me.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the questions, and congrats on a solid solid quarter here.

I guess picking up on a prior line of questioning here, you guys have talked about pretty extensively being able to flip capital from the securities portfolio to the bridge portfolio, but bridge portfolio is up about a billion year-over-year, and securities portfolio is pretty flat. That gives you plenty of capacity to grow the bridge portfolio going forward.

I guess, how do you think that dynamic plays out in the back half of the year? Could we see the securities portfolio get down to a billion-ish type number, or is that too aggressive of a pace?

No, I think that's very possible. I've been asked a couple of times on these calls how many securities do you intend to own forever.

That's almost like asking me how much cash do you want to hold on a regular basis, because I kind of view them the same way, especially short AAA floaters. I think we will be cutting into that inventory of securities between now and year-end, and I think that number will go down, and it could go down quite a bit depending on how active the origination arm is.

Got it. That's good to hear.

Then I ask you guys this one all the time, but on the conduit business, nice to see a little bit of that in the quarter. I think that's the second quarter in a row, but still well below what you guys used to do pre-COVID.

Is that business going to start ramping up, do you think, in the back half of the year, or are interest rates really too choppy for that to really ramp?

I probably would have answered that question differently a month ago, but I think it is too choppy right now. If you actually take a look, never mind Ladder, but if you just take a look at the CMBS business and the issuance over the years, there has been a steady decline in issuance, and it's only recently started to pick up.

The amount of eligible assets that can get into a 5-year or a 10-year fixed-rate loan right now after the downturn since 2021 on, there's just not a lot. That's why you're actually seeing a lot of CMBS deals with sometimes 8, 9 originators, because everyone's trying to amass a critical mass to go with their deal.

I don't really see the volume picking up, and a cautionary note there that most of the loans in the conduit business, in the CMBS origination arm, are cash-out refinances. A cash-out refinance in this market after what we went through in zero interest rates and expenses through inflation is, in my opinion, a rare animal.

I get a little bit concerned when almost everything is a refinance and nothing is an acquisition. To me, that's a flag.

What I think all it really is, not a danger flag, it's just a flag that says we're happy to go slow on this product because we're going to be very picky, and also that it's going to be slow and today's rate movements you'll see a lot of CMBS deals in the pipelines that are going to move a month or two, and might even just go further than that. We're at the point anything I'd say once we cross the 4.50 on the 10-year, and I think that slowed things down, and I think that'll come through.

You'll see that on the residential side, too, on those REITs that have a lot of interest-sensitive home loans.

Got it. That's all very helpful.

Appreciate you guys taking the questions today.

Sure.

Hi, this is Jason Sabshon on for Jade. Thanks for taking the questions.

In your corporate presentation, you outlined a distributable EPS target of 26 to 27 cents. Just curious, what's the target time frame for achieving that?

Do you see ways to grow beyond that? Thanks.

This is Paul. That's just reflective of what we've historically stated, which is we think our business can achieve a high single-digit, low double-digit ROE.

If you just simply apply that to our book value per share, that's what generates that number. The time frame of which is always subject to timing of when our loan portfolio closes and the generation of gains in our multi-cylinder business, but it's something we've historically stated.

We just put some numbers to it in our presentation.

Got it. Thanks.

To hit on multifamily, it'd be great to hear about what you're seeing. Has the supply headwind started to abate some, and is rent growth still muted?

Thanks.

Rent growth definitely still muted, although settling, the concessions offered by the landlords to achieve certain-term leases in multifamily, the whole story about the Sunbelt being a little overbuilt and in particular, maybe Austin, Texas, that's true. I think the situation for a class low B, high C-type properties is probably more impacted.

You've seen some quick drops that I've personally in my career have never seen in a 2-week period in time. I think that'll largely correct itself, and I would say rents are nearly done falling, but the expense side is still a little tricky with a lot of municipalities raising taxes.

I still think it's a bit of a dangerous business to tell you the truth, because you're selling something, shelter, to a party that is pinched for cash generally, and getting more pinched as other expenses go up. That can become a little bit problematic.

We try to avoid that, not by trying to be better than anybody else, we just try to avoid anything other than newer properties with lower leverage and sponsors who have hung in for a while. You can really get a chance to see that now because a lot of these borrowers have just been through a very difficult period of time.

You get a forensic look at what they did during 2023 and '24 when they had some problems. We also are seeing some loans where people are going under application with us, say, for $80 million, and they're coming to the closing with $20 million cash in.

That's a refinance, cash-in refi, but it feels like a purchase to me. We really do like those things, and we also still favor new properties, especially ones coming off construction because you're just watching a lease-up take place, and you've got a borrower with plenty of equity in those deals.

Got it. Thank you.

Hey, good morning, and thanks for taking the question. Ladder's a few quarters into kind of rotating the portfolio, right?

Much higher loan origination from the securities book, and Pamela, you talked about picking up 200 basis points in that rotation. How should we think about net interest income, right, from just the loan book inflecting higher at some point on your borrowing base, right?

Because NII has been flat for the last two, three quarters as you've kind of gone through this. Is that a timing issue?

Is there a point in time where that inflects higher? Just help us think about that.

I don't think there's a straight-line answer on that. I think the answer is it depends on the portfolio.

We have a couple, as Brian said earlier, we're being very selective and picky about our assets. We're trying to originate about $400 to $500 million a quarter, and the weighted average spread can range from 275 to 350 depending on the asset.

The lumpiness and how we've done one or two larger loans, it really is a blend, and the timing will depend on the closing. Right now, as I said, we have about $500 million in pipeline for this coming quarter, and candidly, the spread is on the higher side of that, but if one of the loans don't pan out in diligence, it could quickly drop back into line with the average of 3, 315 that we've been doing.

A long way of saying that I think if you wanted to project out, you should take about $400 to $500 million a quarter at somewhere roughly, call it 300 spread.

I think the bottom line that you asked about on the net interest income, it should continue to rise. I don't think it'll take off dramatically, but I do think we'll see our distributable earnings going up because of other things that Our dividend is not fully covered by its net interest income.

Then we have the other barrels that we use in where we allocate capital, and I do believe those will be performing pretty nicely between now and year-end.

You talk about a combination of both net rental income on our real estate assets, but also as we alluded to on the call, we expect to monetize a few equity positions, and then if we do a one-off conduit. What we're really trying to remind the market is that we have these what people will call a one-time gain on sale, and any individual gain is a one-time gain, but collectively adds up over the year.

Brian has long held we should be looking at Ladder as a annual year-over-year analysis rather than quarter-over-quarter because of that lumpiness.

Gabe, I want to revisit something, too, that, actually Ladder was out in front of when the Fed went on their, hiking campaign when they raised rates 550 basis points. On one of our earnings calls, we said, if rates go up by 50 or 100 basis points, here's what happens to our earnings.

Today, Paul, I think correct me if I have this wrong, but if if I don't know what will happen at the Fed. He's going to play it a lot closer to the vest, but generally, I think he leans towards higher rates.

He might have jawboned this market into higher rates without actually moving. I do think, if let's say he raise they raise rates 25 or 50 basis points, this is an advantage for Ladder because we have a large fixed-rate component on our liability side that's, doesn't go up.

I And Paul, how many dollars per How What's the cents per share if we they raise it by 25 and 50?

2 cents per share quarterly.

I bring that up because the SOFR was at 3.65 for a long time. I think it's at 3.70 something this morning, and it does look to be pointing higher.

I don't think there's any general direction that the Fed is going to take and continue raising rates, but I do think Warsh would like to pull back one of those recent cuts, and I suspect he will, but I don't think he's going to do it in July. He doesn't have to.

Thank you for those comments. That was all very helpful.

The real estate, the hard assets at Ladder are adding to the bottom line. Definitely appreciate that, as well as, to Pamela's point, the other kind of gain on sales that add up over time.

It was just kind of an idea of parsing out the loan book perspective. That commentary is helpful.

Yeah. I think that not unique, but there are times when all of our products are green light, and it's unusual because they're meant to be stressed in certain environments, but right now, other than the fact that there's a volume challenge going on as to finding high-quality real estate to lend on, I think all of our silos are going to be kicking in, and certainly, I think your initial question, net interest income, that should be rising.

Thank you very much.

Okay.

Sure. Thanks, operator, and thank you for joining us today.

Those of you who call in later, thanks too. We'll see you again soon.

Things are going pretty well here. I think we've got some positive surprises that should benefit everybody, all the shareholders, near term.

We're somehow sailing along here and feel pretty comfortable where we are. The question I get asked a lot of times on interest rates, would I rather have rates up or down as a lender?

I'd rather have them up, because there's simply more dollars of interest being paid through the system. I'll leave it at that, and look forward to the next one.

Thank you.