Good morning. This is Faten Freiha, VP of Investor Relations.

Thank you for joining today's call. While our original plan was to review McCormick's first quarter fiscal 2026 earnings results, today's discussion will focus on our announced combination with Unilever Foods and the strategic rationale for the transaction.

Please note that this call is being recorded. The press release and accompanying slide presentation related to today's announcement, along with the materials for our first quarter fiscal 2026 results, are available on our investor relations website, ir.mccormick.com.

With me this morning are Brendan Foley, Chairman, President, and CEO of McCormick; Fernando Fernández, CEO of Unilever; and Marcos Gabriel, Executive Vice President and CFO at McCormick. In our comments, certain percentages are rounded.

Please refer to our presentation for complete information. Today's presentation contains projections and other forward-looking statements.

Actual results could differ materially from those projected. The company undertakes no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events, or other factors.

Please refer to our forward-looking statement on slide 2 for more information. I will now turn the discussion over to Brendan.

Thank you all for joining our call. Marcos and I are pleased to have Fernando join us this morning as well.

Today marks a major milestone for McCormick. We are bringing together two leading organizations, McCormick and Unilever Foods, to create a strong, scaled, and growth-oriented company that will be flavor-focused and exceptionally well-positioned to succeed in today's dynamic environment.

We have always seen the logic of this combination. We're excited by the opportunity to deliver end-to-end flavor experiences to even more people around the world, bringing the taste that inspire, connect, and bring joy to kitchens and tables everywhere.

Before we go further, I want to quickly provide an update on McCormick's first quarter 2026 results. For the quarter, we delivered strong growth in sales, adjusted operating income, and adjusted earnings per share, supported by our McCormick de Mexico acquisition and organic growth across both consumer and Flavor Solutions.

In a dynamic environment, we drove margin expansion through strong top line, acquisition accretion, and disciplined cost management. While our remarks and other materials from our results can be found on our IR website, as Faten noted, I want to underscore that consistent, strong core financial performance from both McCormick and Unilever Foods is foundational as you think about today's announcement.

Now, turning back to today's announcement, starting on slide 5. McCormick and Unilever Foods are strategically and culturally aligned organizations.

We each bring iconic brands in attractive categories, spanning herbs, spices, seasonings, bouillon, condiments, and sauces. Bringing these portfolios together creates an opportunity to execute multiple growth levers, such as expanded distribution, accelerated innovation, brand premiumization, and a scaled, dual-engine food service platform.

At the same time, we see significant, clearly actionable cost synergies layered onto an already strong, structural margin profile, creating capacity for continued reinvestment and attractive shareholder returns. Beyond strategy, our organizations share a common mindset, a passion for flavor, a belief in the power of people, and relentless focus on quality and innovation and strong investment behind our brands.

Turning to slide 6. The pillars of the combined organization reflect distinct and complementary strengths across geographies, channels, and categories.

Together, we create a focused, global flavor powerhouse: scaled, resilient, and uniquely concentrated on flavor. Our balanced geographic and channel footprint enhances durability across economic cycles and market conditions.

The breadth of the combined company diversifies our growth across emerging and developed markets, and retail and commercial channels. In addition, this combination meaningfully expands McCormick's presence in structurally advantaged categories aligned with enduring consumer trends: more flavorful, convenient, and focus on health and wellness.

We will continue to flavor calories while others compete for them, giving us a strong tailwind and aligning us to favorable consumption growth trends. All of this results in a best-in-class margin profile that supports sustained, industry-leading reinvestment behind brands, from global leaders like McCormick, Knorr, Hellmann's, and French's, to high-growth-potential brands like Frank's RedHot, Cholula, and Maille, along with strong regional favorites where we see exciting potential.

Moving to slide 7. We see a clear path to unlock incremental growth grounded in the complementary strengths of our geographic footprints and go-to-market capabilities.

Unilever Foods brands can benefit from McCormick's focus and strength of retail execution in the North America flavor aisle. At the same time, McCormick is positioned to expand more meaningfully in high-growth emerging markets by leveraging Unilever's established scale, deep local infrastructure, and proven route to market.

In food service, the strategic fit is particularly strong: McCormick's front-of-house brand equity and tabletop presence combined with Unilever Foods' deep back-of-house experience and operator relationships. Together, we create more complete end-to-end solutions for customers, strengthening relevance and deepening partnerships.

Innovation is a shared strength. Both our organizations have proven expertise in flavor development and format expansion across consumption occasions, complemented by Unilever's robust culinary capabilities and chef-to-chef engagement model.

Before I expand on these growth opportunities, I will turn it over to Fernando for his perspective.

Thank you, Brendan. We are very enthusiastic about this combination and about our partnership with McCormick.

We are confident it delivers a compelling outcome for all stakeholders. At Unilever, over the past several years, we sharpened our strategic focus, we have reshaped our portfolio towards high-growth categories, and strengthened our operational foundation.

This transaction is a natural extension of that strategy, leading to value creation while giving our shareholders meaningful participation in the upside of a scaled, global, flavor-focused leader with a strong growth and margin profile. Importantly, this is a transaction anchored in a strategic and cultural fit.

Both organizations operate in attractive categories where brand, innovation, and execution matter. Both bring disciplined capital allocation, a strong cash generation, and a consistent track record of volume-driven growth.

Both are driven by performance-oriented cultures with a deep commitment to quality and customer partnerships. We believe this combination strengthens the competitive position of the business, enhances its growth prospects, and creates a more focused platform to lead in flavor globally.

With that, I hand it back to Brendan.

Thank you, Fernando. Moving to slide 9, I'd like to begin by reinforcing why flavor is a structurally advantaged category.

When you think about food, we strongly believe flavor is the best place to be. It is the number one purchase driver across dishes, trends, and occasions.

It transcends age, culture, dietary preferences, and income levels, making it both resilient and highly relevant in a dynamic consumer environment. Importantly, flavor is fully aligned with today's health and wellness priorities.

As consumers increasingly focus on cooking at home, adding more protein and produce, and pursuing healthier lifestyles, flavor plays a critical role in elevating those choices. Younger consumers, particularly Gen Z, are notable contributors to these trends.

Taken together, these favorable flavor tailwinds position us well to drive sustainable growth as a combined company. The highly complementary nature of this combination gives us multiple ways to capitalize on these tailwinds.

The clear, tangible, and many growth levers we see across this combination create real excitement for all of us here. Let me highlight our four priority areas of focus on slide 10: maximizing our reach by leveraging expanded distribution and a highly complementary portfolio across markets; unlocking incremental growth by scaling high-growth-potential brands across new geographies, channels, and consumer occasions; integrating McCormick's Flavor Solutions and Unilever Food Solutions enhances our dual-engine model with a scaled, globally distributed platform with strong brand equity among chefs and operators; accelerating innovation at scale by leveraging our shared R&D and technology to lead the future of flavor and stay ahead of evolving consumer preferences.

These areas of focus are actionable growth levers for the combined company. Moving to slide 11.

Together, we have an end-to-end flavor proposition, from cooking to condiments, with brands that have minimal overlap and maximal adjacency. Our iconic, globally recognized brands, Knorr and McCormick, will enable us to be part of more cooking occasions across more markets.

At the same time, our condiments portfolio, including hot sauces, mustard, and mayonnaise, allows us to be present in even more kitchens and on more tabletops, meeting consumers' growing needs for healthy, flavorful meals. Moving to slide 12.

Beyond adjacency, the combination also accelerates the opportunity for high-growth-potential brands. The brands on the slide, as well as the number of brands in our portfolio, enjoy high consumer loyalty, connection to consumer trends, and global appeal, particularly with young consumers.

For example, we have the leading share in hot sauce in the U.S. with Cholula and Frank's.

We have begun expanding in EMEA, where we have seen great success in highly competitive markets, for example, Cholula in France. Through Unilever's capabilities, will we be able to accelerate expansion not just in EMEA, but also in Latin America and Asia-Pacific.

With Unilever Foods' strong presence in these regions, these brands will have substantial opportunities to expand their distribution and reach new consumers. Another unique opportunity is Maille, an almost 280-year-old French brand deeply connected to French culinary tradition as a prestige mustard and mayonnaise brand.

We see opportunities to scale its presence across a number of new large markets, similar to what we have done with Cholula. This is just one example of many that we see across the portfolio.

In addition to retail expansion, slide 13 highlights the power of our combined food service platform. Together, we will strengthen a scaled business-to-business leader with approximately $6 billion in pro forma annual sales, positioning us among the largest global food service players.

Unilever Food Solutions brings global presence with deep back-of-house capabilities and culinary expertise, and breadth that meaningfully expands McCormick's reach across multiple food service operators. Complementing that strength, McCormick offers a powerful branded front-of-house presence and an extensive partnership network, particularly across independent, non-commercial, and chain operators.

This creates significant cross-selling opportunities. We see clear potential to elevate key Unilever Foods brands while utilizing our partnerships to drive awareness and trial.

In turn, this visibility will reinforce retail demand and brand equity, creating a virtuous cycle across channels. Supporting all of these growth opportunities is innovation.

Slide 14 outlines how we will leverage our combined technology and R&D capabilities, an essential strategic pillar and long-term competitive advantage. Together, we bring leading capabilities in R&D and flavor science, underpinned by deep consumer insight, culinary expertise, and advanced technology platforms.

By combining our resources, we meaningfully expand our capacity to innovate, accelerate speed to market, and drive differentiated solutions across retail and food service. Our capabilities are highly complementary.

We bring our leadership in seasonings and heat and our expertise in natural ingredients. Unilever brings their emulsion technology, which enhances texture, and their ability to leverage protein as a flavor.

All of this positions us to support customers to deliver on consumers' evolving dietary needs, as well as accelerate innovation across the portfolio. By combining our technology, culinary, and scientific expertise, we are building a differentiated flavor innovation engine designed to sustain growth and reinforce category leadership over the long term.

As Fernando noted, McCormick is the natural home for Unilever Foods brands. We have long thought about this combination, and will bring it to lessons learned from our own M&A journey, which has been deliberate and strategic.

As you can see on slide 15, we focus on strengthening our leadership in heritage herbs and spices, expanding internationally, building scale in condiments and sauces, and growing our business-to-business Flavor Solutions platform. Each transaction has aligned with our long-term vision and disciplined capital allocation strategy.

This combination with Unilever is no different. While this transaction is larger than prior deals, the core drivers of success are the ones we are familiar with.

This will be my top priority, and we are approaching it with confidence and humility. We have already begun integration planning in partnership with the Unilever team.

Let me share some of the details on slide 16. We are building a detailed integration plan well ahead of close, positioning us to execute efficiently and with strong governance.

Dedicated leaders from both companies have clear responsibilities, supported by experienced external integration partners. Unilever brings significant carve-out expertise and remains financially invested, including two years of board representation, ensuring alignment.

Business continuity is essential to our approach, with comprehensive TSA support across key functions. In addition, we have tremendous respect for the talent at Unilever Foods, and they are integral to the success of this integration and long-term value creation.

We are defining the target operating model early and executing market-by-market to balance speed with precision. Synergy targets are aligned and backed by a structured delivery road map.

A detailed IT transition plan is already in motion to ensure secure and seamless integration. At the same time, we are proactively shaping the commercial agenda to unlock the growth potential of this portfolio from the outset.

We know what works: welcoming extraordinary talent from Unilever Foods, retaining key capabilities, and applying proven playbooks to scale brands and accelerate innovation. This disciplined integration, paired with intentional growth acceleration, a combination designed to deliver value while maintaining operational continuity from day one.

Before turning it over to Marcos, let me highlight why this transaction makes so much sense right now on slide 17. We have long seen the benefits of the overwhelming strategic fit between the two businesses.

Both businesses are in a strong and growing position, benefiting from structural tailwinds. Together, we will create a company that is stronger, more resilient, and ready to deliver on its full potential in a dynamic environment.

With that, I will turn it over to Marcos to discuss the combined company's financial profile.

Thank you, Brendan. This transaction represents a significant milestone for both companies.

Together, we're creating a global flavor leader with expanded scale and capabilities, positioned in attractive, high-growth categories and supported by a strong and compelling financial profile. Let's begin on slide 19 with an overview of the transaction structure, which was also outlined in our press release.

This combination has been thoughtfully designed to create long-term value for each set of shareholders. The transaction is structured as a Reverse Morris Trust, as we are issuing a fixed number of McCormick shares as consideration for Unilever Foods upon closing.

This issuance is expected to result in pro forma ownership of the combined company's equity of 65% for Unilever and its shareholders and 35% for McCormick shareholders. Unilever will also receive $15.7 billion in cash, subject to customary closing conditions.

This is the optimal combination of debt and equity that allows McCormick shareholders to realize significant value from the transaction, supported by the borrowing capacity of the combined company, which is expected to generate strong operating cash flows. The transaction implies an enterprise value for Unilever Foods of approximately $44.8 billion and approximately $21 billion for McCormick, representing a multiple of approximately 13.8 times calendar year 2025 EBITDA for both companies, based on a one-month volume-weighted average share price.

From a governance and leadership standpoint, Brendan and I will continue in our current roles, ensuring continuity of strategy and execution. McCormick will remain globally headquartered in Hunt Valley, Maryland, reinforcing our commitment to our heritage while building a scaled, global flavor leader.

In addition, the combined company's international headquarters will be in the Netherlands, where a substantial presence will be retained in areas like R&D, among others. Now moving to the financial profile of the combined company on slide 20.

On a pro forma 2025 basis, annual net sales are $20 billion, supported by volume-driven growth and a best-in-class operating margins of 21%. Building from this foundation, we see clear opportunities to further enhance the profile through meaningful revenue and cost synergies.

We plan to reinvest incremental revenue and cost synergies back into the business to accelerate growth. Specifically, approximately $100 million will be reinvested into our brands to increase marketing to support and innovation, fueling sustained volume growth and strengthening our competitive position.

In addition, we anticipate $600 million in annual run-rate cost synergies, representing approximately 8% of McCormick's 2025 pro forma sales, including McCormick de Mexico. The synergy expectations are compelling, given the limited overlap and existing efficiency levels of both organizations, and reinforce our confidence in the value-creation potential of this combination.

Importantly, synergy delivery will be supported by proven capabilities in partnership with the Unilever team. Our Comprehensive Continuous Improvement program, or CCI, has consistently delivered cost discipline, productivity gains, and operational efficiency across the organization.

By applying this established framework to the combined business, we're well-positioned to execute with rigor and translate scale into sustainable margin expansion and long-term value creation. Turning to slide 21, we outline the key areas where we see clear opportunities to unlock cost savings across the combined company.

Through a comprehensive diligence process, leveraging cross-functional teams from both organizations, we have identified actionable savings across procurement, media, manufacturing, logistics, and SG&A. This resulted in a balanced set of opportunities across cost of goods and SG&A.

We expect to realize the $600 million in synergies by year three, with approximately two-thirds captured by the end of year two, reflecting a disciplined and phased integration plan. Turning to slide 22.

When you combine the strength and momentum of both stand-alone businesses with the impact of these revenue and cost synergies, the result is a structurally advantaged, best-in-class financial profile. This is about focused scale and profitable growth.

The combination is expected to deliver meaningful accretion in the first full year across sales growth, adjusted operating margin, and adjusted earnings per share. By year three, as synergies are realized, we expect sustainable organic sales growth of 3% to 5%, supported by deliberate reinvestment in our brands and an enhanced innovation engine.

At the same time, operating margins are expected to expand to approximately 23% to 25%, reflecting structural efficiencies, procurement scale, supply chain optimization, and SG&A leverage. Together, this creates a higher-growth, higher-margin platform with stronger cash generation, positioning the combined company for durable, long-term value creation and sustained profitability.

Moving to slide 23. The combined company will maintain a solid and resilient balance sheet, underpinned by strong, consistent operating cash flow and a disciplined capital allocation framework.

This foundation supports meaningful deleveraging while enabling McCormick's long-standing practice of returning capital to shareholders through dividends for the combined company. Both McCormick and Unilever have long-standing commitments to shareholder returns and historically have divided payout ratios of approximately 60%.

We expect the combined company to maintain a dividend consistent with its history. Strengthening the balance sheet is a clear priority.

We expect net leverage to be at or below 4 times at closing and plan to reduce it to approximately 3 times within two years, supported by robust cash generation and disciplined execution. Throughout this period, we expect to maintain our strong investment-grade profile and preserve the financial flexibility that has long differentiated McCormick.

With that, I'll turn the call back to Brendan.

Thank you, Marcos. Before I wrap up, Fernando and I would like to summarize the benefits of this deal for our respective shareholders.

Strategically, this combination meaningfully expands our portfolio with iconic, high-growth-potential, and local favorite brands, strengthens our presence in attractive geographies, and enhances our scale with customers around the world. McCormick becomes a preeminent global flavor powerhouse, advancing our vision to be a global leader in flavor.

Financially, the combination is compelling for our shareholders. We expect it to be accretive to McCormick growth, adjusted operating margin, and adjusted earnings in the first full year, with continued long-term growth and upside to our financial performance.

We expect to maintain a strong balance sheet, supported by disciplined capital allocation and clear deleveraging priorities. Our commitment to returning cash to shareholders through dividends remain unchanged.

Ultimately, McCormick shareholders gain access to a larger, more diversified business with faster growth, a stronger margin profile, and continued commitment to shareholder returns.

For Unilever shareholders, this is about unlocking trapped value, giving shareholders exposure to a pure-play home and personal care company and to the upside in the global flavor leader.

Thank you, Fernando. To wrap up on slide 25, we hope that you take away from our call today is the following.

This combination is strength plus strength, with two highly complementary flavor leaders coming together. Together, we are creating a scaled, global, flavor-focused company with leading brands in attractive, advanced categories.

We see multiple levers to accelerate growth while leveraging the power of leading iconic brands, high-growth-potential brands, and local favorites. At the same time, we have plans to deliver clear, achievable cost synergies and building on a best-in-class financial profile, with meaningful accretion, strong margins, and a compelling return profile, supporting our continued investments in growth.

We recognize that the integration is crucial, and recognize the work ahead. We are prepared to execute, supported by a detailed integration plan, positioning us to execute efficiently and with strong governance.

Through it all, McCormick will be McCormick, grounded in 137 years of leadership and guided by a passion for flavor. With that, operator, please open the line for questions.

Great. Thanks very much.

Good morning, everybody.

Good morning, Andrew.

Hey, there. Maybe to start off, McCormick's track record on M&A and integration, as you mentioned, is admirable, but obviously, this one is just many, many times larger, and the industry's track record with larger deals is pretty mixed.

What gives you the comfort in taking such a big swing on this one? Really, what are you doing maybe differently on this one from an integration standpoint, just given the sheer scale?

Thanks for the question, Andrew. We're ready to take on the integration at this level of scale.

We recognize, though, more importantly, what we're taking on. First, there are a couple of important steps they have to complete before close.

We need to do regulatory filings, prepare for a shareholder vote, but also Unilever needs to separate its food business from the overall Unilever organization. Those are certain things that have to happen in advance, obviously, during this period of time.

We are leveraging our playbooks to make sure that we have the right integration approach. I would just maybe break it down to three broad areas.

The first starts with a best-in-class external partner to help guide this. We already have that type of a firm on board to really help us think through the best way to approach integration.

Now, we've done that in the past, and it's been very successful, and it's kind of kept us really, I think, executing against our expectations on that. As in all the integrations, very recently, we tend to overdeliver on our objectives there.

We also have a year or more to properly develop a disciplined plan. That's really an important period of time, obviously, to make sure that we get this right.

During that period of time, there are dedicated leadership that will be on this, but it's also a combination of not only McCormick leaders being a part of this, but also Unilever leaders, too, because they're also committed to this being a successful integration. We're also planning brand acceleration at the same time against that agenda to deliver the growth potential.

The examples where we've done this, obviously, is French's and Frank's, but I would even look to FONA, where we modify the integration approach based on the business. We don't execute necessarily a standard template on every one of them because each business is different.

They present different opportunities, and sometimes there's different ways of working and how you go to market. We certainly found that with FONA.

We took a very deliberate approach on that one, and then you can see the success that we've had. I think the magic in terms of how we look at this thing is not approaching everything as a nail and a hammer.

We really make sure that we have the right approach, I think, to each individual situation. I think region by region, this will probably play out that way.

Then, we do have to execute a thoughtful separation. It will be supported by TSA agreements, and we have a very experienced partner in Unilever in doing this.

Unilever employees are remaining with the business, and that's an important, I think, concept to think about, which is there might be many regions in which simply McCormick doesn't operate, you can imagine the Unilever employee base and talent really becomes part of that business. There's sort of minimal disruption in that context, and so we're able to still run the business very effectively.

Overall, I would just say we're really committed, and we have an invested partner in integration. We have dedicated leadership, best-in-class advisers, ample time to plan, and this is going to be our approach in going into this.

Thanks for that. Then maybe second, just quickly, Unilever Food EBIT margins are already in sort of the low 20s, a level not many food companies have been able to reach, let alone sustain.

I understand much of this is due to the two scaled brands that are part of that portfolio, but I guess are you comfortable that the brands have been appropriately invested in such that margins like these are, in fact, sustainable, and maybe Fernando can comment on that as well? Thanks so much.

Let me open it up, and then I'll ask Fernando to add some context there. When you look at both of our companies, you see robust support for the brands from a standpoint of brand support and innovation.

Definitely, I think that's where we're very much aligned in terms of how we think about how to drive growth against this portfolio. It's not only that we still have sort of a strong baseline that we're walking into this with, but we're going to add to it.

Fernando?

Thank you, Andrew. Brendan, hey, we have been investing around 10% in brand marketing investment behind our food business, it's probably one of the best-supported businesses in the industry.

Of course, enjoying the benefits of incredible brand scales, Knorr, €5.5 billion, Hellmann's, €2.5 billion, very, very sizeable scale, and gross margin in the mid to high 40s. All this has built a real virtuous cycle and circle of growth.

Really, we have here very, very well-supported brands for a very long period of time. I think this is one of the features that we share with McCormick, a real belief in how to build brands and a real belief in investing heavily behind our best assets.

I would add to what Fernando just said is that, as we said in my prepared remarks, we are going to continue to invest going forward. Particularly the synergies, cost and sales synergies, we are going to invest back into the business.

My mention about $100 million incremental targets that we have, that's going to be used to be invested back in the business, so that momentum will continue going forward.

Thanks very much.

Great. Thank you, and good morning, everybody.

Good morning.

Brendan, and maybe, Fernando, you can weigh in here, too. I guess my understanding is that Unilever Food and HPC operations are pretty well integrated in certain markets around the world.

As part of the integration plan, Brendan, you mentioned TSA agreements. I guess could you speak at a high level to the scope and anticipated duration of those agreements, and maybe also the costs associated over time with McCormick standing up its own operations?

I think from a TSA agreement standpoint, it's probably going to be in more than just one form overall. When you think about from an IT system perspective and separation there and unhooking part of the business and then rehooking it with us, there's sort of TSA considerations overall in that.

Then also when you think about sort of our TSA agreements as we hand over and we sort of have that first-year integration live together as a company, we're going to have TSA agreements there, too. Fernando, you want to add to that?

As since 2022, Unilever has moved into an organizational model in which we have separated our four key business groups, and they run fundamentally as stand-alone organizations. The reason for that at that time was to really ensure that we were building the capabilities required to compete with pure play in each of these industries, but at the same time, giving us the flexibility to make separations of this magnitude, or the previous we have done in ice cream, in a kind of relatively short time frame and without significant disruption.

Our foods business is in more than 80% and a stand-alone organization, with their own manufacturing setup, their own distribution setup, their own route to market, separate sales force. We really believe that we can separate business without significant disruption here in the time frame that we have established.

Great. Thank you very much.

Then, Marcos, if I understand the deal structure correctly, it looks like you're going to be financing the transaction with new financing and new debt versus absorbing any debt from Unilever. I guess, maybe if you can just talk to the drivers there.

Are there restrictions from Unilever assigning its existing debt, or just the rationale of going to the market new?

No, the the rationale is is really a combination of stock and cash, the deal. It's an RMT think about as an RMT-like transaction in which we are providing a fixed number of McCormick shares as consideration for the Unilever Foods business, and they will own 65%, Unilever and its shareholders, and McCormick will retain McCormick shareholders will retain the 35%, which is the remaining piece.

Then, in addition, we are providing $15.7 billion of cash to Unilever as part of this deal, and and that takes us to a 4 times leverage at close. What we feel very comfortable about is that the margin profile of this business will, it's very strong, and and we will be able to delever very rapidly from 4 times to 3 times in about two years.

It was part of the overall considerations of of this transaction. It puts us, the the company or the the transaction at 13.8 times EBITDA multiple, which is parity with McCormick.

It was the the overall consideration between equity and and cash as part of this transaction.

Okay. Very good.

Thank you, all. Appreciate it.

Mhm.

Good morning, and thanks for the question. You noted the combined organic sales growth last year of 2.4% and the view of 3% to 5% longer term.

At CAGNY, Brendan, you gave some reasons why you anticipate a sales reacceleration over the next couple of years. Maybe we could kind of do a similar exercise for the combined company, in particular thinking through how much of that acceleration is more industry conditions versus maybe more self-help-type initiatives.

Thank you.

Sure. Thanks, Tom, for the question.

When combined, you have to think about the fact that we're 1/3 of the equation right now, and the Unilever Foods business is 2/3 of the equation. As we bring these businesses together, we do see stronger growth in the range that we had on the slide there, at 3% to 5%.

These are businesses, both, that have been delivering volume-driven growth consistently over the last several years, we start with confidence in the base business. Then when we take a look broadly at that growth overall, we see the two businesses, kind of combined together, growing in that 2% to 3% range.

As we think about towards that year three, as we outlaid on that slide, we see incremental growth coming from the businesses together. That is more about self-help than it is about sort of the industry getting better with itself.

This is really, I think, maybe the core of your question is we think this combination drives the opportunity to drive a stronger growth profile together, and that's why we've sort of laid it out the way we talked about it there, and comparing sort of our commentary to CAGNY. I can go on further on growth, but I thought I'd stop there, Tom, just to make sure if I've answered the core of your question.

You did. Thank you.

Just to follow up on the mayonnaise side, you do have McCormick de Mexico now consolidated. Unilever, obviously, has a very large mayonnaise business.

Just wanted to ask on the overlap and if there might be any limitations to consider in combining these.

Right now, it's too early to speculate on that type of a thing, and we just look forward to working with regulatory authorities on making sure that we review this transaction. We'll be able to talk about that at a later date.

Understood. Thank you.

Good morning, everyone. Can I start off with you talked about the deal being meaningfully accretive to earnings, and I think earnings per share was mentioned from the outset.

Are you able to put a number or an order of magnitude around that and what the source of that accretion might be?

Alexia, at this moment, we are not putting a number out there. It is meaningfully accretive in the year one post-close across all lines of the P&L, including, obviously, EPS.

As we get close to the close, we'll be able to provide more information as we continue to learn about the business. It is a substantial margin profile that this business has.

We talked about growth just now. Gross margin is very healthy, and we'll be investing back in the business as we have done in the past, both organizations, and driving operating profit from 21% currently to a range of 23% to 25%, with the synergies of $600 million flowing through to the bottom line.

It's a very meaningful accretion across the P&L, but we will give more information about the exact as we get near the close.

Thank you. Then just looking around the world, where do you see the revenue synergies being most significant?

I imagine Brazil might be a place where the McCormick brand could be strengthened simply because of the strength of the mayonnaise brands from Unilever over there, but are there other parts of the world where the revenue synergies could be significant?

I'm going to make a couple of comments here and ask Fernando also to provide his perspective. I see it as not necessarily dedicated to one or two different regions.

I would say it's really across many different. If you think about North America, Latin America, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific, in each region, we see opportunity overall.

If you think about in the Asia-Pacific region, there are a number of markets that Unilever is in that we're not in, as an example. Or in markets that we're both in, we see opportunities, obviously, to drive even stronger growth in a market like China, for example.

When you jump over to EMEA, there are a number of markets where McCormick doesn't have presence, and so we see opportunities in revenue synergies there. If you jump over to North America, we see opportunities really, I think, to even strengthen the performance of both brand portfolios.

Latin America is, I think, one of those opportunity areas when you think about Brazil, I think you're right. We don't have McCormick presence there.

While we have really strong presence in Mexico or parts of Central America, I think the Southern Cone is an area that Unilever has quite a bit of strength, and so we see synergy opportunities there.

I feel on top of the shared strength of the brand portfolio, I believe that McCormick brings an incredible product range, and Unilever brings an incredible distribution infrastructure globally. When you can leverage these two things, you have huge opportunities.

I agree Asia, Latin America are obvious geographical opportunities. I would like to highlight also the opportunities in food service.

McCormick is a leader in the top of the table, let's call it, and Unilever is leader in back of house. Unilever Food Service brings a lot of expertise in Asian cuisine, particularly in Chinese cuisine, that is a growing trend.

I believe opportunities are both in retail and in food service. I would say also in expanding the range in our core brands, making some of the breakthrough growth brands shine, and of course, expanding the food service opportunity at this massive scale.

Thank you very much. I'll pass it on.

Mhm.

Hey, Brendan, Marcos. Good morning.

Thank you, guys, for the question. Brendan, just one quick clarification.

I believe the Unilever India subsidiary had talked about maybe not including the food business in the transaction, maybe you could just clarify for us, will the transaction include India Foods, or is that kind of excluded from current thinking?

Yep. To be certain, the transaction does not include India Foods.

Okay. Perfect.

Thank you for that. I know Fernando just gave a bit of an overview on kind of some of the food service opportunities, but, Brendan, it'd be helpful, I think, to hear from you just to expand on where you see, is it bringing more of the Unilever assets into front-of-house and food service?

Is it more Unilever helps McCormick get more into back-of-house? Just where you see kind of the revenue synergies on the food service side.

Thanks very much.

Thanks for the question, Peter, on food service. Food service is an exciting area.

Look, let's talk front-of-house first. When I think about the brand portfolio for Unilever, the opportunity as we see it right now, and Fernando and I have talked about it, is really about the Hellmann's brand, really having more front-of-house presence.

That is a good opportunity, I think, for this combined portfolio as we think about that. We see that continued growing presence that we have on tabletop and front-of-house and even on menu.

We've had a lot of success getting and partnering with operators, particularly, sort of regional chain-type operators, on getting on menu with our brands. We see that as an opportunity.

The Knorr brand is very strong back-of-house. I think that let's kind of maybe transcend from just a U.S.

perspective around this. You have to really have a global perspective, because I think the strength of Unilever's food service presence is definitely very strong globally.

We see McCormick opportunity in that, because we have a lot of strength here in North America, as an example, but we have an opportunity to accelerate our growth in food service at a global level. That's another area where we see synergy and opportunity to drive growth.

Back-of-house, the McCormick brand name is back there, obviously, with herbs and spices and seasonings, as is the Knorr brand, but the Unilever chef-to-chef coverage model and having really, sort of strong relationships with the person making the menu decisions back-of-house, is a coverage model that is quite significant. We see that as an opportunity, obviously, to bring in, sort of more of the McCormick-type of expertise in cooking, which is not an overlap with Knorr.

I think that that's another area of opportunity. If I were to oversimplify, think global as an area, think front-of-house opportunities for Unilever brands, but also think back-of-house, sort of the coverage model there is an important way to establish penetration and strength within the food service channel.

Awesome. Thanks very much.

Hi, thanks. I think this is a question for both management teams.

It's going to take a year for this transaction to close, theoretically. Fernando, maybe you could talk about what you learned in the process of separating ice cream, how you were able to keep people on that team focused on executing their operating plan.

I guess the same question for the McCormick team. Thanks a lot.

Thank you, Robert. We have the recent experience of separating ice cream.

That was a big business; it's an €8 billion business, not a small business, and established in that company in 57 countries. I feel, in this case, we have the advantage of separating foods and integrating that into an established organization like McCormick, and that simplifies things a bit.

In our case, we have had a team of experts with a lot of capabilities. That team is now at the service of McCormick to make this separation happen and to support in the integration also.

I believe we learned a lot with previous experiences like tea and spreads, in which the separation didn't take into account really sorting out the issue of the stranded costs. In ice cream, we did that much better, and we have the opportunity at the same time of accelerating our growth performance, delivering the separation of ice cream, and increasing our margins.

Of course, it takes a lot of leadership from the front, and this doesn't happen without good planning, without good external support. I know Brendan has put that in place already, and of course, in our side, we will provide all the necessary support.

There will be transitional service agreements in place for around two years also in different areas like IT, distribution, in order to ensure that this is a smooth transition and there is no disruption in the case of our food business transfer to McCormick.

Rob, I think from a McCormick perspective, there are maybe two perspectives I'd love to share. The first is being able to continue driving and the business performance right now, we have a really strong team, and so as we put dedicated leadership and teams on this work, we also have been a great talented organization for those people to step up and really continue leading the business.

We see our ability to do that has been very strong and high, and, obviously, we feel like we have a very disciplined approach at this in the past because we have done integrations, although the scale is different, and we acknowledge that. I think that the element of that is really going to come through in this planning, and making sure that we are very, very specific and precise in terms of how we make sure that we continue really strong support against the current business while we also take on what was a pretty important initiative.

There was a question earlier in the call, which I'm not sure I fully answered as I kind of reflect back on my reply, and that was what's different about this than the other ones. I think what's really different here, and I really want, hopefully, everyone to appreciate this, is, when you look at traditional sort of an acquisition or transaction, you've got a company taking over something else, and that company's employees, sort of then go over and take over the business, to speak.

This is very different. This is a combination of two companies already with the support and the discipline and the knowledge of running the business coming together to execute this integration.

I think that element of Unilever being a partner in this is not a temporary point; it's a sustainable point. When we think about those employees, part of that organization, becoming part of McCormick.

We see a lot of strength in that. If you had to compare on a principle what may feel different in this, I think that would be one of the key points I would call out.

Thank you.

Hey, thanks for the question. You've quantified synergies and discussed some of the considerations with regard to the separation, such as TSA agreements, but I'm wondering if there's been any considerations for dissynergies that could arise from the separation.

If so, any initial quantification of those dissynergies, and also how they might split across the Unilever RemainCo and the foods business? Thanks very much.

Hey,

I can answer this. We don't see any revenue dissynergies here.

We don't see in the case of Unilever, basically, as I mentioned before, these are stand-alone businesses. Our food business has their own sales force, their own manufacturing, their own operations, and logistics.

Basically, we don't see any fundamental issue of dissynergies in our side.

Great. Very helpful.

Then, Brendan, Marcos, with regard to the multiple, the 13.8 times EBITDA multiple, can you just talk a bit more about the conversations that went into determining what was the right multiple to pay? It seems like there was some focus on not paying more than McCormick's 13.8 that you also quoted, but just any color, consideration that went into determining the right multiple would be appreciated.

Thanks very much.

Yes, Max. I would say that both businesses are great businesses, and Unilever Foods is a fantastic addition, as you think about the two companies coming together.

The way that we were assessing this deal was parity in terms of the multiple between the two companies. Unilever brings a lot, not only the scale, but healthy margins.

McCormick, as is very differentiated as well in terms of the volume growth over the last few years, and our margin profile as well. We play in an advantaged category.

When you put those two companies together, we felt like the parity multiple would be adequate in terms of this transaction. That's kind of the high-level rationale for being at the same 13.8 times.

Okay. Thanks very much.

Mhm.

Hey, good morning, all. Thanks so much for taking our questions.

The first one, just wanted to touch on, understand all the synergy potential and the overlap between some of the portfolio, but just wondering if you can kind of help us understand if the current backdrop in the food world or in the staples world in general has kind of changed your timeline for this, or given you any sense of urgency to get this done, or if it has had any impact in any way?

I think, obviously, there's a lot going on in the world right now, and so that's important to kind of keep in mind. I think we've always viewed Unilever Foods as a great strategic fit.

We're in this moment where you can pick another year, something is going to be going on, but it still comes back to is this really strategically a strong fit, and does it make sense? When an opportunity presents itself like this, we think that it then becomes the right time.

This transaction is about long-term potential of the combination and where we see multiple levels of growth in established and emerging markets and across channels and brands. I think I would also then really kind of emphasize the long-term nature of our thinking and our planning has to really, sort of drive your thought process on something like this.

We're certainly aware of the near-term pressures facing, not just the food industry, let's say, but broadly, you think about the conflict in the Middle East and the broader CPG space. Each of us are taking steps to manage our business accordingly.

However, we continue to believe in just the long-term fundamentals that really underpin the confidence in this combination, such as structural flavor tailwinds and emerging growth opportunity. In the meantime, sort of call it within the short term right now, we're both laser-focused on managing our businesses to deliver our plans.

I think that's the best context I could give you because, obviously, there is a lot of headlines in the news.

Understood. Appreciate that.

Then maybe just last one, given everything going on in the Middle East, just wondering how some of those dynamics impact your thinking on this, whether it's in terms of realizing some of those synergies or getting this deal complete or any other dynamics that could be impacted by what's happening across the world?

No, I can't call out a specific element of that that caused us to think about this differently, or faster, or slower. I'd just go back to my long-term commentary and our thought process on that.

Appreciate the thoughts. Thanks very much.

Great.

Thank you so much. Thank you, everyone, for joining our call today.

If you have any further questions regarding today's information, please feel free to reach out to me, and this concludes our conference call for this morning. Thank you.