Welcome to Lesaka Technologies results webcast for the third quarter of fiscal 2026. As a reminder, this webcast is being recorded.

Management will address any questions you have at the end of the presentation. To ask a question, live participants are requested to join the Chorus Call line by registering via the link provided.

Alternatively, please enter your questions into the Questions tab of this webcast. Our press release and investor presentation are available on our Investor Relations website at ir.lesakatech.com.

During this call, we will be making forward-looking statements and I ask you to look at the cautionary language contained in our press release, presentation, and Form 10-Q available on our website. As a domestic filer in the United States, we report results in US dollars under US GAAP.

However, it is important to note that our operational currency is South African rand, and as such, we analyze our performance in South African rand, which is non-GAAP. This assists investors in understanding the underlying trends in our business.

I will now turn the webcast over to Ali.

Good morning, and good afternoon. Thank you for joining us for Lesaka's Q3 results presentation.

I'm pleased to report Lesaka has delivered a strong set of results for Q3 FY 2026. It's also worth noting that this is substantially on a like-for-like basis.

Net revenue is up 16% to 1.58 billion rand, short of our guidance of 1.65 billion rand, due to slightly softer than expected performance in Merchant, as the division focused on the integration of the business units and closures of non-core business lines. We remain confident in the profile and trajectory of the Merchant division, as Lincoln will talk you through in more detail shortly.

From a profitability perspective, group adjusted EBITDA came in at 337 million rand, at the top end of our guidance, and a 45% increase over last year. Adjusted earnings was up 246%, from 43 million rand to 148 million rand.

Similarly, adjusted earnings per share increased from 52 South African cents to 1 rand 80 for the quarter. Net debt to group adjusted EBITDA of 2.1 times is a significant improvement over last year, and is close to our target of 2 times.

Dan will unpack the divisional numbers in more detail shortly. From the last quarter, we have simplified how we present our business, emphasizing its core structural revenue drivers.

We present a single total view for active consumers and active merchants, and aggregated ARPU for each. Consumer ARPU is a function of our transactional bank account and the penetration of our lending and insurance products within our account base.

While Merchant ARPU is a function of our five products: acquiring, alternative digital products (ADP), lending, software, and cash. Over time, we may continue to further refine our definitions of ARPU to better reflect the business strategy.

We have 750 enterprise clients, rather than representing the drivers in Enterprise on an ARPU basis, we do so on a take rate and total processed volume for ADP and utilities. These six variables across the group together explain more than 90% of our net revenue.

We will use this framework as the key drivers of the net revenue of our businesses each quarter to thread the operational performance of each division along with the financial results. In full year results, we will provide more granular information on the underlying drivers of each of our core products by division.

For now, I will hand you over to Dan to take you through our financial performance in more detail.

Thank you, Ali. Good morning and good afternoon to everyone joining us today.

Before turning to our operating financial performance and the components of our business, I would like to focus on the excellent progress we've made this quarter in addressing some of our legacy and non-core activities, as well as creating One Lesaka. These initiatives have resulted in a few non-recurring items that have had a mixed impact on our results this quarter.

In our Merchant division, we made the decision to exit the ATM business, reflecting our disciplined focus on profitability and capital allocation. The business was structurally loss-making and immaterial in scale.

Its wind-down removes an ongoing group adjusted EBITDA drag and allows us to redeploy capital towards higher-return, digitally led growth opportunities as part of our broader portfolio optimization. This resulted in a total impairment charge of approximately 27 million rand, split between impairment entries and one-off items.

Also within the Merchant division, SwitchPay, a legacy buy now, pay later product, has been sunset, resulting in an impairment charge of 6.5 million rand recognized in the quarter. At a group level, we focused on the collection of monies owed to us from a legacy investment and reversed receivables allowance of 25 million rand.

Similarly, we also deregistered a legacy offshore entity, being Master Payment, resulting in a gain of 14 million rand. As highlighted last quarter, we are progressing with our major rebrand to One Lesaka.

The rebrand has been launched with an activation campaign, with the external customer rollout planned over the coming months. Rebrand-related costs of 16 million rand were incurred during the quarter, and we maintain our guided total rebrand costs in the range of 50 to 75 million rand.

Given our transformation is One Lesaka and our office consolidation, we also recognized an impairment charge of 26 million rand on leased premises due to lower utilization rates. Finally, the accelerated write-down of our intangible assets relating to our legacy brands has tapered off, with the purchase price amortization of intangible assets now at 98 million rand, which reflects a more normalized run rate.

Looking at our divisional performance, Lesaka delivered nearly 1.6 billion rand net revenue, a growth of 16% for the quarter. Merchant net revenue declined 4% to 751 million rand, as previously explained by Ali.

We expect Merchant net revenue to be flat next quarter. However, as you will see on the next slide, segment adjusted EBITDA for Merchant increased this quarter.

In contrast, the Consumer division delivered another record performance, with net revenue increasing 41% to 627 million rand, an all-time quarterly high. The Enterprise division also performed strongly, delivering net revenue growth of 51% to 220 million rand.

This growth includes three months of contribution from Recharger, compared to one month in the prior period. However, it also reflects meaningful organic growth as the division's refreshed strategy and operating structure continue to gain traction in the channels they serve.

At a group level, adjusted EBITDA of 337 million rand was an all-time quarterly high for Lesaka, and represents a 45% year-on-year increase. The Merchant division recorded a 3% increase to 151 million rand.

We are pleased to see evidence of the efficiencies implemented over the past six months translating to an increased margin to above 20%. Our medium-term expectations remain that the Merchant margin will continue to increase to above 30%.

Consumer segment adjusted EBITDA increased by 81% to a record 213 million rand, reflecting strong operating leverage and disciplined execution. Last quarter, we saw over 1 billion rand of origination volume for our lending product, and we are starting to see the positive impact flow through to our financial performance.

The Enterprise division delivered a segment adjusted EBITDA contribution of 35 million rand as the business scales. Group costs were 62 million rand, slightly elevated due to an investment made in improving finance, risk, and compliance frameworks, and strategic hires at head office level.

This is a more accurate reflection of our group costs run rate going forward. Adjusted earnings per share continued its strong upward trajectory, increasing 247% to 1 rand 80 per share, underscoring our ability to effectively integrate and extract synergies from our inorganic growth activity and our ability to scale organically once the integration and transformation phases are complete.

Our strong cash generation continues this quarter, with cash generated from business operations of 365 million rand, closely tracking our group adjusted EBITDA. Given the short duration of our credit cycle and seasonality effects, we only required an additional 10 million rand of funding for our lending books, reflecting the efficiency and scale of our operations.

We paid 98 million rand in cash interest, and while not presented on the slide, but reflected in the annexures to this presentation, is a release of 320 million rand of seasonal working capital compared to the prior quarter. In aggregate, the group generated a pleasing 608 million rand in operating cash flow.

We continue to manage our capex carefully, with 76 million rand of investment this quarter. Our capex was relatively evenly split between cash vaults, POS devices, and software and platform development.

The strong earnings growth and cash generation, combined with prudent capital allocation, resulted in our net debt to group adjusted EBITDA improving to 2.1 times this quarter and bringing us closer to our medium-term target of 2 times. In recent quarters, the benefits of the platform we are building have become increasingly evident.

Continued growth across our distribution footprint, combined with ongoing product innovation, has further improved operating leverage, with operating margin rising from 17.2% a year ago to 21.4% this quarter. As the transformation of our Merchant division progresses, and following the completion of the Bank Zero acquisition, we continue to expect operating margins to trend towards over 30% over the medium term at a group level.

A similar positive trajectory is evident in our capital investment profile. Consistent with prior guidance, we expect capex to remain below 400 million rand per annum.

On a last 12 months basis, capex as a percentage of EBITDA has reduced from approximately 46% a year ago to 29% this quarter. Together, these trends highlight the strengthening fundamentals of the business as we continue to evolve and scale our platform.

Thank you. I'll now hand over to Lincoln to take you through our divisional performance.

Thank you, Dan. Good morning and afternoon, everyone.

As Dan has alluded to, we're in the middle of building an integrated merchant business from five historical components. We are modernizing our core systems into a unified backbone, enabling our servicing staff to provide a more efficient and effective customer service.

We're centralizing data, creating a 360-degree view of each merchant, and implementing AI to strengthen our risk capabilities and reduce customer friction. This enables better credit decisions and reduced fraud.

Furthermore, we are leveraging these assets to drive smarter customer engagement. For an example, AI-enabled WhatsApp support and targeted cross-sell engines will simultaneously enhance the client experience and we believe will drive higher ARPU.

At an overall level, active merchants increased by 6% year-on-year. Looking at the mix of our active merchants, our community merchants grew 8% year-on-year.

Last year, we restructured our community merchant sales force to allow for a more targeted distribution strategy, and we're pleased to see our community merchant portfolio increase. The number of active corporate merchants fell 4% year-on-year, primarily due to increased competition in monolined products, for an example, merchant acquiring.

At the aggregate, merchant ARPU was 7% lower than last year and driven primarily by an increase in the number of community merchants as a percentage of the total. Community merchants are growing faster than corporate merchants, and this has a predictable impact on blended economics, as they generate materially lower ARPU than corporate merchants, as shown in the slide.

As the community segment becomes a larger proportion of the overall base, aggregate merchant ARPU naturally decreases, even while engagement levels, transaction volumes, and profitability increase. Secondly, as mentioned last quarter, the community ARPU reduction was impacted by a network-driven reduction in airtime commission rates.

Since that reset, ARPU has been relatively stable quarter-on-quarter. Within the corporate space, we saw flat performance in ARPU.

Our current aggregation of ARPU includes network fees, that is interchange, and from our corporate segment, but excludes network fees from our community ARPU. We expect to review the definition of corporate ARPU in the new fiscal year to align the treatment of network fees to community ARPU.

Product penetration in Merchant was flat at 46% for two or more products. The merchants with three or more products reduced to 7%.

The primary driver for this decline is due to the increase in our community merchant base, who typically engage with ADP and acquiring. The total number of merchants with three or more products declined as we've refined our lending criteria to the community merchant base.

While penetration rates for multi-product accounts have shifted over the period, we're in the early stages of our ecosystem journey. Our current performance is intentionally driven by a land and expand strategy.

As seen on the left-hand chart, we have a broad base of merchants through hero products and a set of highly value ancillary products that tie merchants into the Lesaka ecosystem. The core of our thesis remains unchanged.

As product density increases, does the value of the merchant. Within our community merchants, we can see that moving from a standalone solution to a 3+ product proposition drives a 94% uplift in ARPU.

Increasing our product penetration in community relies on merchant strategy to expand lending and cash to our existing community base. In the corporate segment, Lesaka experienced a 60% uplift in ARPU when our customers shift from one product to two products.

We currently have no corporate clients with three or more products. Our industry-specific strategy in Merchant is focused on increasing our product penetration in Merchant.

For example, in the restaurant and hospitality segment, we're adapting our products and sales force to be able to serve our clients with a combination of software, acquiring, lending, and cash. In the fuel industry, we're developing our acquiring and software capabilities to augment our current cash and lending offerings.

We believe this ecosystem product approach, coupled by a single distribution and servicing capability, will grow percentage of corporate merchants with three or more products in the medium term. Looking at our merchant volumes for the quarter, card TPV increased by 7% to 10.6 billion rand, with active acquiring merchants up 9% to 74,000.

On the cash side, volume grew 2% with a slight increase in vaults for the quarter of 4,900. Within the base, as with previous quarters, we've seen net reduction in the corporate merchant base and good growth in the community base.

The growth of our cash offering in the community merchant space has supported the strong growth in the TPV of our alternative digital products, or ADP for short. As community merchants immediately digitize their cash takings in their own vaults or in a nearby merchant's, they have more value in their wallets to use for airtime, electricity, and voucher purchases for resale and supplier payments.

ADP TPV is up 30%, reflecting traction for our offering. Following the margin compression seen within our prepaid solutions in financial year 2025, particularly airtime, we're pleased to see a normalization and return to growth in these volumes, with 11% increase in prepaid solutions products and a 47% increase in supplier-enabled payments.

Turning to merchant lending, originations in quarter three were 22% lower year-on-year at 227 million rand. The comparative period in quarter three of financial year 2025 included unusually high spike in originations from our corporate channel, driven by fuel-related lending push and a rollout of pre-approved lending offers late in the year 2024, which then originated in the quarter three financial year 2025.

While January and February were muted, we did experience a very strong March, much of which was driven by demand in the fuel sector ahead of anticipated price increases. Our lending portfolio closed 4% up at 427 million rand.

We are comfortable with this lending activity, and it reflects a deliberate decision to be conservative in merchant credit whilst we refine our merchant lending offering as part of our broader merchant ecosystem. This is not about the lack of opportunity.

It's about exercising capital discipline and protecting the long-term quality of the book. Software, particularly through our Unity platform in the hospitality space, is central to our long-term merchant strategy.

Unity is not about site growth alone. It is the cloud-native platform that enables the merchant ecosystem and sets the platform for multi-product penetration at scale.

Approximately 50% of all Unity clients are fully integrated into our acquiring proposition, with 80% of all new software clients on-boarded utilizing Unity. In conclusion, we're laying the foundation for a stronger, scalable business through platform consolidation, data and AI investment, and integrated product strategy.

Consumer had another excellent quarter, with an 81% increase in segment adjusted EBITDA. As expected, our KPIs have all shown impressive increases, with active consumers up 19%, ARPU also up 19%, and cross-sell success continuing its upward trend.

Active consumers now stand at over 2 million, with a permanent grant recipients of 1.7 million, representing a 14.6% market share. Looking forward, our medium to long-term expectation is that we could reach a 25% market share based on our current growth trajectory and distribution plans.

Encouragingly, in quarter three, only three players showed growth during the quarter, of which Lesaka grew the largest. Net additions in quarter three were almost 26,000, more than double our nearest competitor, demonstrating the strong brand and product fit we have developed in the segment.

Importantly, growth is not dependent on competitor dislocation alone. There are approximately 150,000 new grant entrants every month, and our expanding distribution footprint positions us strongly to capture a disproportionate share of these new customers.

By June, we expect to have increased our footprint to a further 30 community sites and a further 15 new branches. This expansion materially strengthens our access to both urban and rural grant recipients and supports sustainable organic growth.

Our ARPU has increased by 19% year-on-year to 99 rand per month, driven by continued engagement and cross-sell success. At the end of quarter three, 20% of our active consumer base was utilizing our full product suite, up from 17% last year, with 50% of our base having two or more products.

This consistent increase in our product penetration rate is a clear demonstration of the power of our value proposition and superior distribution capabilities within the segment, and is a clear indication of our ability to continue to grow. Our lending product has been the key driver of our Consumer division's financial performance.

In the third quarter, we originated approximately 856 million rand, representing a 33% year-on-year increase, with the outstanding book growing 73% to around 1.4 billion rand. This momentum reflects a successful rollout of our nine-months loan product, which now represents nearly 50% of all new lending originations.

We expect this to continue increasing, supporting growth in both book size and average tenor. We are also evaluating a modest increase in maximum loan values and repayment terms to meet customer demands while maintaining our disciplined risk framework.

We have a deep understanding of our lending base, with a high proportion of originations to repeat and long-tenured customers. This supports effective credit scoring, provisioning, and product development.

The portfolio continues to perform within normal parameters, and our 6.5% provisioning levels remains above the observed risk experience, with any refinements to be communicated transparently at the end of the year. Turning to our funeral and pension plan insurance business, we delivered another very strong quarter.

Gross premiums written grew by 38% to 246 million rand, while in-force policies increased by 34% to 704,000. We've recently started rolling out insurance policy sales to non-Lesaka consumers within the SASSA ecosystem.

This represents a significant opportunity, with an estimated 3 million grant recipients currently uninsured. We are leveraging our existing distribution network and sales force to access this market efficiently.

While the initiative is not yet financially material, it is strategically important and directly aligned with our purpose of extending affordable financial protection to underserved communities. Our insurance product is a key driver for compounding our product penetration in the short to medium term.

As we increase our attachment rates of insurance at the time of client onboarding, and we increase our standalone insurance sales, we do expect the collection rate to moderate to circa 90% over time. Importantly, we believe this will still result in a net positive gross written premiums for Lesaka.

We believe the overall quality of our insurance book will continue to remain high and compare favorably against the wider insurance market. The Consumer division continues to demonstrate strong momentum, with resilient growth drivers, effective last-mile distribution, and clear product relevance.

By leveraging our technology and distribution network in tandem, we are confident that Consumer will remain a core engine of value creation for Lesaka, delivering both financial performance and meaningful impact for the communities we serve. I will now move on to the performance of our Enterprise division.

The Enterprise division continues to make solid progress this quarter, contributing 35 million rand or about 10% to group adjusted EBITDA. Strategic progress is evident in ADP TPV for the quarter, which increased 19% year-on-year.

Bill payments were up 12.5% to 9 billion rand, and prepaid solutions grew by more than 50% to 2.8 billion rand as we continue to expand our collector and receiver ecosystem. As highlighted in previous quarters, we've also partnered with several key players, increasing our distribution and collection footprint.

We are now seeing the growth from our channel partners driven by targeted marketing campaigns. Our ADP take rate improved by 22% to 1.3%.

As a reminder, we earn a fixed fee per bill payment transaction. However, we earn a commission on TPV for facilitating buying and selling of prepaid solutions.

As the business scales the prepaid solution offering, we will see a product blend leaning towards an ad valorem revenue model. In utilities, TPV increased 18% to 477 million rand on a like-for-like basis, with active meters rising to 368,000.

Excitingly, in quarter four, we will launch an electricity advance product to our utilities customers. This product will allow Lesaka utilities customers with active meters to load electricity when they are short of funds via an interest-free facility.

The business model is simple, as we will charge a flat fee for the service and recover the advance from future purchases. We look forward to sharing more information as the product rolls out through the base.

Thank you. That concludes our operational review.

I will hand back to Ali now for the outlook.

Thank you, Lincoln. Innovation is at the heart of who we are.

We don't just want to win the game, we want to change the game. We thought to provide examples of three strategic initiatives that demonstrate that across our businesses and which set the foundation for our continued competitive advantage.

Firstly, we believe payment rails globally will increasingly move to blockchain as a superior underpin from a resilience, availability, and cost of settlement perspective. We also believe that in the South African context, a ZAR-denominated stablecoin will form the foundation of this.

As a founding partner of ZARU, we intend to pioneer use cases across our ecosystem to allow consumers and merchants to settle securely and at low cost, eliminating the friction of traditional banking hours and fees. We will provide more updates on what we are doing and what this should mean at our end of year investor presentation.

Secondly, the scarcity of credit provided in a frictionless, fair, and sustainable manner across the continent is a major opportunity for us. We choose to focus on making that credit available to underserved consumers and merchants, where traditional banks don't have the capability, competency, or desire to compete.

One focus for us in this respect is in short-term credit advances against utility products like airtime, data, and electricity. You will see increased activity from us in this space, leveraging either touch points to our existing banking customers through an app or USSD channels, or utility customers in homes where we provide the electricity meter.

In both instances, we would expect to have an advantage in repayments vis-a-vis others. Thirdly, the explosion in AI tools offers a wonderful opportunity for a pioneering technology company with digital enablement and efficiency of operations at the heart of our values and competitive advantage, to further this advantage relative to traditional incumbents with legacy platforms.

We are actively embedding AI tools across our group, from engineering teams' code development, to new product launches, to fraud management, and operational efficiencies that allow us to better provide services more securely and more sustainably, complementing our human engagements. Again, we will be providing in due course more details on some specific initiatives and the impact thereof.

Turning to guidance, we are tightening our guidance forecasts for the rest of this financial year. We are updating our net revenue guidance to 6.2 billion rand to 6.5 billion rand for FY 2026, the midpoint of which implies 20% year-on-year growth.

We are on track to deliver our group adjusted EBITDA guidance for the year, as we did for this quarter, but also tightening the guidance range to 1.25 billion rand to 1.35 billion rand, implying we expect to come in at the bottom end of the previous range. The midpoint of our updated group adjusted EBITDA guidance implies 43% year-on-year growth for FY 2026.

We are also updating our adjusted earnings per share guidance for the year. We previously provided guidance of at least 4 rand 60 per share, and we are now raising this to a range of 5 rand 50 to 6 rand per share, the midpoint of which implies a growth greater than 150% on a year-on-year basis.

We will increasingly reference our adjusted EPS as the primary measure of our profitability. We are also reaffirming, from a net income perspective, without exclusions, we expect to be profitable for FY 2026, the first year this will be the case since the creation of Lesaka four years ago in May 2022.

In our end of year presentation in September, we will be providing our guidance for FY 2027 and also a medium-term outlook for the next three years. Given that we expect the Bank Zero acquisition to be completed in the coming months, that being so, we will be providing guidance for FY 2027 and the medium-term outlook inclusive of Bank Zero.

Thank you for attending our earnings presentation. We will now address any questions you have for the team.

Thank you, Ali, Dan, and Lincoln. Chorus Call, please can you open the line for Ross Krige from Investec?

Good afternoon, everyone. Thanks very much for the call.

Three questions from me. Just firstly on the Consumer, just with regard to the very strong margin accretion that we're seeing consistently over time, and the jump up in Q3.

If I look ahead at some of the opportunities there, you're talking about the volume growth prospects, the size of the market that you're addressing there, you've talked about the cross-selling prospects and how you've executed on that, and then you've alluded to that comment on risk performance being better than what your provisioning suggests, which you'll give more detail on. If I put all of that together and think about operating leverage ahead, am I correct in saying that that points to significantly higher EBITDA margins even off this base?

That's the first question. I can carry on if you like.

We can address that one if it's helpful, Ross, first. The short answer is we do see the ability to continue to expand those margins.

Year-on-year those margins have gone from 26% to 34% in the Consumer business, and yes, we do believe there's more room for growth as we scale that platform.

Great, thanks, Ali. Moving on to Merchant, just two parts to this question.

One on the ARPU dynamics, Lincoln explained a lot of this, but maybe just in terms of the outlook. If I look at the active merchants by type, across Corporate and Community, should we expect to see stable ARPU going forward or some pressure as the mix changes within each of those segments?

Or, yeah, just any comment on the next 6 to 12 months. Then on profitability, clearly the margin improved there as well as you talked about.

Just trying to understand what the sort of runway if we look at the next, I guess, 6 months, 12 months, whether or not some of the, I guess, cost-saving activities that you've embarked on will still come through and how long that runway is.

I think, I'm not sure, Ross, if it was you at the last call or somebody else who asked the question around how we see the evolution of the margin. Our perspective is that we see a continuation of the evolution in the next quarter.

However, from FY 2027, we do expect to see a different trajectory there, and giving you a little bit more granularity around that. Obviously, we have a smaller ARPU in the Community space than in the Corporate space, but the Community space is growing faster.

However, within Community ARPU, we expect in the coming year to see an increase, both because of the scale and quality of customers that we onboard, as well as because we expect to have an increase in the product penetration within that base, in a similar way as we experienced that in the Consumer business. What I would also say is that the ARPU, while the number of merchants in the ARPU is a good representation of the net revenue, that's why we're focusing the net revenue drivers on that, it doesn't obviously speak to margin.

That margin is both the gross margin and the EBITDA margin, and we believe that we have room in both capacities. From an EBITDA margin perspective in the Merchant business, this quarter last year we had an 18.7% margin, and obviously in this quarter, it's north of 20%.

That's despite the fact that obviously the revenue performance was not where we expected to be going forward. We do see that margin having substantive room for growth.

I think we have previously communicated that we think the Merchant business should be targeting EBITDA margins of closer to 30%, and execution will define how quickly we get there. Like the Consumer business is evolving, the Merchant business should follow a similar trajectory.

Just from a Lesaka perspective as a whole, I think it's probably also worth observing that we see operational leverage there as well. While we have made some investments in group costs, we don't expect that to be growing at the same rate as our EBITDA margin.

Group EBITDA margins, which have gone from 17% to 21%, we expect to also be increasing substantially. The question on the sort of the margins within the businesses, you always have to look at a few different components from the ARPU perspective.

The first one is the mix between Corporate and Community, where there are differential components. The second one is the cross-sell, how effective we are in basically layering the product, because obviously you make much more ARPU around them.

The third is there is, because ARPU is just a revenue number, some aspects of seasonality associated with it. If you were to have looked, say for example, back to last quarter, because it was during the festive season, you would expect there to be larger volumes of throughput, you'd expect that to be larger ARPU as well.

The final thing to consider in that respect is obviously the margins per product. You will get, going forward, better understanding of those underlying drivers because we will be providing at the end of year presentation some of the second derivatives of that.

In essence, the focus in the Merchant business over this year has been about trying to improve the quality, trying to improve the unit economics, as we signposted, because we want to be scaling into something that has an excellent return profile around it. We are still in the process of doing that.

I think that the strategic intent is ahead of the operational reality there, whereas in the Consumer business, I think we are fully in the slipstream of where we wanted to be. One thing I would just emphasize within that Consumer business is there remains within our core product offering for the SASSA grant recipients material room, but that is not where we are circumscribing our aspiration.

Clearly, we have an aspiration obviously to extend that as well. There's sort of the existing market share within the existing segment, and then there's the opportunity to move into adjacent segments.

Great, thanks, Ali. Thank you.

On Enterprise and Utilities, just wondering if you could guide on what the net financial impact could be from migrating the other sub-products of ADP volumes in Merchant?

Sorry, Ross, I don't think I heard that properly.

Sorry, I'll repeat. On Enterprise specifically within Utilities, I think there was a comment on migrating some of the sub-products of ADP volume, the prepaid volume to Merchant, I think specifically, and then I think there was a comment that they would be migrating the rest of the sub-products of ADP volume from Enterprise

to Enterprise. I understand.

Basically, think of the Enterprise division in addition to having external customers, 750 corporate clients, it's also servicing ourselves. There is operational efficiencies that can be released as a consequence of that, which should speak again to margin improvement across the group, part of which would be represented in the segment that it services, both Consumer and Merchant, would ultimately be consumers of Enterprise services, but would also then be represented in the Enterprise business's margin.

It would be distributed. Exactly the quantity of it, it's I'd say probably less about the scale of the operational cost saving, and more about the control and the quality that we can provide as a consequence of bringing it in-house and not having third-party dependencies on our ecosystem that affects our product delivery.

That ultimately will speak to our promise to our customers. There is some economies of scale, however, in being able to aggregate our purchasing capacity, right?

We will clearly be a very material player as a consequence of that aggregation. We do expect to see margin improvement on what we can buy as a consequence.

Makes sense. Thanks a lot.

Thanks, Ross. I am going to move now to Frank Geng from Briarwood Capital.

Hi, guys. Thanks for taking the question.

Just had two quick ones on Consumer. One is, I guess, what's driving the greater ARPU numbers year-over-year and sequentially?

Is that mostly kind of the loan and the insurance book or any other initiatives? Then secondly, on the margin, yeah, it seemed a bit higher versus the past and especially kind of on an incremental basis.

Curious what's driving that. Is that mostly kind of lending or there's a provisioning kind of step-down, just any color on that?

Thanks.

Lincoln, do you want to have a go? Yeah.

Thanks, Frank. I think as we've highlighted before, our ability to cross-sell is a key, key part of our success.

The distribution model that we have enables us to be where the customer is, and cross-sell the loan and cross-sell the insurance. I think that you're starting to see that growth, and that momentum will continue.

The other things that Ali is mentioning will be adding to that, but for now, there's still room within that consumer base to be able to cross-sell the loans and be able to cross-sell the insurance. Already when you look at some of our numbers, you're starting to see that over 50% of our clients have got two or more products with us, and that more than 20% of our clients have got two two products with us.

You're starting to see that we've got that ability to cross-sell even more into that base, and that will improve the business substantially.

The

second question on

provisions?

I think the overall outlook on our provision has been very conservative. We have tried to remain in line with the risk that we see, but we have signaled that there are opportunities to make some changes, and when we do make those changes, we'll be transparent about what those changes are looking like.

For now, even all the new changes that we've made in the loan product, both in terms of the duration of the loan and the size of the loan, has not seen any material change in the quality of the book. The quality of the book remains very, very good.

Got it. Thanks, guys.

Thank you, Frank. We are going to move to questions from the webcast now, and we have a few questions from James Slabbert from SBG Securities.

Question one: Since the start of the Middle East conflict, are there any particular developments you have observed in Consumer and Merchant? Talk about collectibility of premiums and loan repayments, but also credit quality.

Any commentary on the resilience of clients would be appreciated.

I think in substantial terms, the answer is not really in terms of issues relating to credit quality or there's obviously a consequence of the Middle Eastern events in terms of the cost of fuel, and so disposable income from the market as a whole. I would just emphasize that we are really not a proxy on the market.

Our opportunity is in effectively growing substantially our share in the market by having a superior proposition. Our expected growth rates are more around our capacity to either take market share or alternatively by growing a market that is currently not digitized.

I don't know, Lincoln, if you have anything specific you want to add to that?

I would say the same thing to that Ali said. In the actual core business, we have not seen any material changes that are there.

Of course, there are long-term impacts that are there in the broader society, but in our business, there's no material impact that we see, either in our ability to collect, or in the credit quality, or in any of the performance of the underlying businesses.

The

only thing I'd add to that is, when there's dislocation in the market, it creates an opportunity for us to respond to our customers' and our clients' needs as well. We successfully did that in our Merchant business in March, which was, let's call it, the starting point in the Middle East conflict, with fuel prices increasing.

It gave us an opportunity to support our fuel merchants. In our Consumer business, should this lead to elevated inflation, it might create an opportunity there for us to support our clients, of course within appropriate credit measures.

I think in general, as a business, we do have pretty good resilience, but that there will always be specific areas or specific things. I think what we're trying to message is it's not anything that is very material in terms of the P&L performance.

I could also point out that clearly as a business, we also roll out point of sales. Those point of sales, overwhelmingly they come from Asia, and so you do have to be cognizant of not just the availability, but also the exchange rate.

If the exchange rate improves, then vis-a-vis, we will have a benefit, and if it declines, it'll have a cost.

Thank you. Question number two: With revenue increasing at a group level, how do we square the decrease in cost of sales?

Is there some favorable pricing from suppliers, or any other dynamic at play that has allowed you to manage cost of sales this well?

There is a lot of dynamics in that. The first one is we are consciously exiting business lines that are not core, that have lower margin, and so you'll have a mix effect around that.

We are growing in revenue terms higher-margin businesses faster, and we're also benefiting from scale and operational efficiencies across the business. It's not one single thing.

It's a number of things coming together. The rather pleasing thing is I don't think we are nearly through that journey.

We have quite a lot of operational efficiencies that we can extract in the business over time to continue to improve that. There are tools that are also being made available to us increasingly as a consequence of AI innovation that will allow us to do even more than we might have thought was possible before.

Thanks. Question number three: How should we think about our working capital cycle in terms of collecting receivables, extending debtors, and selling inventory?

Are there periods in the year that are typically more favorable than others?

Dan?

There is a cyclicality in our working capital cycle, quarter two, let's call it the December period, is peak volumes for us, therefore, our inventory naturally spikes in that period of time. Quarter three, compared to quarter two, results in a de-gearing in our inventory.

You would have seen in this period, inventory clawed back about 100 120 million quarter-on-quarter, so that drove a large portion of the working capital cash inflow. Similarly, our receivables also has a similar cyclicality.

Our payables are roughly flat, so that unwinds a little bit less. Comparing things quarter-on-quarter, quarter three sees an unwind, quarter four normalization and slight increase, and in quarter one of the next financial year similarly.

Thanks, and the last question from James: To what extent does Bank Zero integration enable you to up those 3+ cross-sell metrics in Merchant, particularly in the corporate space?

I think that the Bank Zero transaction has multiple benefits for the business. Specifically in the Merchant space, clearly Bank Zero has had a historical focus on SMEs as being a digital bank provider for them.

The consequence of the transaction should allow us to effectively be able to offer a banking product through our existing sales force, our existing relationships, which should be accretive, augmentative, in terms of the ARPU that we would be able to generate, especially because we should be able to also generate benefit from float as well as from other sources.

Thanks, Ali. The next question is from Jamie Friedman from Susquehanna International Group: Capex as a percentage of revenue seems to be declining and helping free cash flow in page 11.

Is that a function of mix? How should we think about it?

In an aggregate basis, we've guided the market on an annual basis roughly 400 million of capex is the right quantum of capex to support the group both from a maintenance and from our growth ambitions. There's a little bit of seasonality around that in terms of, yeah, timing of delivery of POS devices, for example.

Similarly, timing of when we bring on board capitalized software development costs if they're at the appropriate stage. Quarter-on-quarter, some variability, but I'd look at it in the whole on an annual basis.

Our capex shouldn't exceed 400 million. Of course, therefore, as our EBITDA is growing, we get the benefit of that capital efficiency in our group.

Just to augment Dan, there is obviously an element of mix effect associated with that, in that the product lines that are growing faster are typically ones that have lower capex requirements. I think that that general trend as you move towards greater digitization should continue, because if you think about where, as Dan said, the capex is spent, a non-trivial part will be on cash vaults and on point of sale.

Even in the context of that being on point of sale, there's evolution in customer usage of feature phone that we would expect going forward. I'm quite confident around the long-run resilience of the cash conversion of the business, and expect to see a continued expansion of that capability.

Albeit it's not necessarily going to be a straight line every quarter. There's going to be instances in which investments will need to be made, but substantively expect a declining percentage.

Thanks, Ali and Dan. The next question is from Charles Boles from Titanium Capital: Buy now, pay later seems to very much be in vogue in SA.

You have exited SwitchPay. Does this suggest you have a negative view of the BNPL market, or was the exit due to factors specific to SwitchPay?

I think it was more specific. I don't have a specifically negative view of the buy now, pay later market.

I think that as a business in the Merchant space, we are at a build moment within our credit proposition, as Lincoln was alluding to within the conversation. It doesn't represent our lack of willingness to participate in that market.

It was a legacy product that was not fit for purpose in terms of the scalability that we needed to achieve, and the unit economics and hygiene we wanted.

Thanks. The next question is from Tim Ohls from Laurium Capital: Within the Merchant segment, please could you share some color on the competitive dynamics resulting in the decline in the corporate merchant numbers, and what more can be done to defend this?

Are you able to share current two and three product penetration rates for community and corporate customers separately?

On the product penetration rates, I think we can share. I think that, as I said before, that in going forward in the next investor presentation, we are going to provide greater granularity, you can expect that clarity there.

In terms of what's going on in the corporate space, where we have a strong resilience of our offering is where we have multiple products, specifically two products in the corporate space. If you have a point of sale software with attached acquiring, like in the hospitality space with Unity, you will have lower churn.

If you have standalone point of sale single product, you should expect that to be less defensibility. I think that the reduction in the customer base is a combination of some legacy that we inherited that we didn't feel was sort of core to where we were going.

I don't have an expectation that that trajectory is going to continue. I do have an expectation that we will in the coming year be investing in growth in our merchant count, as well as in the corporate space as well as in the community space, albeit the growth within the corporate space I expect to be lower than the community space.

It's not representative to us of the medium-term growth path.

Thank you. The next question is from Jared from All Weather: Please provide more color on the level of provisions for the loan book, and how that changes under the current macro environment.

I don't know if you want to go, Dan? Yeah.

Hi, Jared. I'd split it between different types of provisioning in the merchant loan book and in the consumer loan book.

In our consumer loan book, we provide at 6.5% at the moment. We've run obviously a variety of different models.

Our experience indicates something more favorable than 6.5%. As signaled in the previous quarter results, we are revisiting the appropriate levels of provisioning.

We think that year-end would be the right time to either confirm our current levels of provisioning or change them based on obviously what the models and our experience is at that point in time. They're well within our overall risk appetite, and as I said, our experience there is better than 6.5%.

On our merchant loan book, which is far smaller, but obviously the average value of loans is significantly higher, there we provide according to typical expected credit loss models. Our experience there, previous quarter, you would have noted we did have some specific impairments, which affected our overall level of merchant earnings, specifically on the lending side.

That has normalized, those handful of specific instances, and there was nothing unusual or out of the ordinary course in terms of our credit experience in this quarter.

Thank you, Dan. The next question is from Christos from Avior: Will the ZARU settlement on the merchant side be in ZAR or ZARU?

I'm not sure I understand the question, to be honest. Ultimately, there's a difference between whether the settlement is in fiat currency, in ZAR or versus what is the infrastructure through which that is converted.

The question is to whether a merchant wishes to accept a stablecoin as opposed to ZAR would ultimately, I think, be the prerogative of that merchant. The thing that I think is more relevant is what rails is that settlement occurring through.

Just to reiterate, the fundamental difference is blockchain is 24/7. You don't have to wait for banking hours.

Speed of settlement is a core differentiator, and the cost associated with utilizing that blockchain ecosystem should be far favorable than legacy banking rails. The utilization of blockchain as plumbing for merchant accounts is separate to whether the merchant is actually being settled in the fiat currency or in a stablecoin.

Thank you, Ali. We are going to move back into the Chorus Call now for our last questions from Theodore O'Neill from Litchfield Hills Research.

Hey, thanks very much and congratulations for beating the estimates in the quarter. My first question is, are you seeing any impact from the conflict in the Middle East?

Not really and not especially. There's, as we mentioned earlier, some residual impacts.

There's a consequence in terms of obviously the cost of fuel, but that does not really translating into negative impact. In some ways, we've had a beneficial consequence in that it creates an opportunity for us to do advances to petrol companies ahead of price changes.

There is obviously some other consequences in terms of consumer disposable income and things, but fundamentally, we're not really an index on the economy, and we don't view it as being a critical factor in our performance in that, at least for the moment.

Exiting the ATM network, was there a buyer for that? By exiting it, was part of that thought behind that that you would align better with Bank Zero?

There wasn't. We didn't feel that there would be a benefit in selling it.

It was going to be more costly, I think, than potentially winding it down. Otherwise, that would have been what we would have done.

In terms of strategically, it was purely based on the fact that we want to be a business that delivers exceptional results. It was not a core part of the offering.

It was not a business line that is indexed to digitization or one that we consider to be necessary to support the ecosystem, and it was providing a negative drag on earnings. We would rather spend our time on things like the digitization of the society and blockchain enablement and AI enablement than on a legacy piece of infrastructure.

Right, right. Finally, can you give us an update on the status of the move into the new headquarters?

Yeah. I think by the time that we are doing this investor presentation in the next quarter, we should be doing so from our new headquarters, and we're very excited.

It's not just about having a nice, refreshed office environment. It's also, I think it'll have a profound impact on the way we work and in the efficiency of the business, because currently, as we are trying to coordinate across different aspects, sitting in the same office with all the components, I think will be hugely beneficial.

We are expecting to see good, positive ways of work develop as a consequence of that. It also will dovetail nicely with the more visible launch of our brand.

It's actually a very exciting season coming up for us in that respect.

If I could just add that what it also coincides with is us launching our values and bringing our teams together across all the different provinces, getting people to really fully understand what One Lesaka means, because there's going to now be one brand, and both consumers and merchants and enterprise customers will relate to one brand. Getting our staff across the country to understand what this is about.

It's not only the new offices, it's also those offices that will start to build in the months to come in the different provinces, but also people starting to work across the divisions and across the functional areas in head office, as Ali was saying, is the way we want the new culture to emerge from this. That again drives this thinking about cross-selling, doing more for our customers, and giving them more solutions.

The more people get to know about those solutions, the better it will be for them to be able to sell those solutions to customers, be they merchants, or consumers, or enterprise clients.

Also, Theo, just to add, it's not just Johannesburg. We're all moving into one office in Cape Town as well a few months subsequently.

We expect to be doing the same in Durban. Across our footprint in the provinces, there's a rationalization processes associated with that.

Our office footprint will shrink across the country, and it is a very powerful thing for the business.

Thanks very much.

Thank you, Ali, Dan, and Lincoln. Thank you everyone for joining the Chorus Call and through the chat and for engaging in today.

We are going to wrap it up here. As a reminder, there will be a replay of the webcast on the Lesaka investor website.

Thank you everyone for your participation.