Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. I'm pleased to share Hammond Power Solutions' first quarter 2026 financial results.

Joining me is our CFO, Richard Vollering, who will walk through the financial results in more detail following my remarks. After that, we will open the call up for questions.

We started 2026 with strong momentum, reflecting healthy demand across our end markets, continued progress in our manufacturing footprint, and disciplined execution across our organization. Q1 was a record quarter for us, with sales of $264.8 million, driven primarily by strength in the US and continued momentum in custom products, particularly for data center applications.

Gross margins improved sequentially from fourth quarter, reflecting pricing actions, favorable mix, and better factory overhead absorptions as volumes increased. Demand across our core end markets remained healthy during the first quarter, supported by long-term trends in electrification, power reliability, and energy efficiency.

Data center activity continues to be a meaningful contributor, driving both volume and higher custom product mix. Order activity during the quarter was strong, and our backlog increased sequentially and significantly year-over-year, giving us good visibility into the remainder of 2026 and supporting our continued capacity ramp, particularly in Mexico.

As volumes scale, our focus remains on efficient backlog conversion while managing cost pressures. Tariff-related input costs remain a headwind compared to last year, but we are actively addressing this through pricing discipline, mix management, and continued improvement in factory absorption.

The sequential margin improvement we delivered in the quarter reflects progress in these areas. While margin recovery requires ongoing execution, we believe that we have the right operational levers in place as the year progresses, and Richard will provide more insights later in the call.

During the quarter, we also announced our agreement to acquire AEG Power Solutions, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions. This acquisition expands our technology portfolio, broadens our geographic footprint, and adds meaningful aftermarket and services capabilities.

We see this as a strong strategic fit as our customers' power needs continue to grow in complexity and scale. We expect this acquisition to close in the second quarter of 2026.

Looking ahead, we remain confident in the fundamentals of our business. Our strong backlog provides good visibility, and the demand drivers supporting our markets remain intact.

While we continue to monitor variability in input costs and project timing, we believe Hammond Power Solutions is well positioned to execute through the remainder of the year. With that, I'll turn the call over to Richard to review the financial results.

Thank you, Adrian, and good morning, everyone. I'll walk through our first quarter financial performance and provide some additional context on margins and our statement of financial position.

Sales were $264.8 million in the first quarter, up 31.5% compared to the $201.4 million in the first quarter of 2025. Growth was driven primarily by US and Mexico, where sales increased 41.8% year-over-year.

Canada was up 3.2%, and India increased 33.5%, largely due to the timing of project shipments that shifted from the fourth quarter of 2025. Gross margin was 30.1% compared to 31.5% a year ago, reflecting the impact of tariffs, both direct and indirect, on input costs, along with ongoing variability in commodities and project timing.

Importantly, gross margin improved sequentially from 29.2% in Q4 2025 as pricing actions flowed through, product mix improved, and factory overhead absorption benefited from higher volumes. General and administrative expenses were higher year-over-year, driven primarily by share-based compensation.

In Q1 2026, share-based compensation expense was $5.8 million compared to a recovery in the prior period, reflecting the impact of a higher share price. Excluding share-based compensation, general and administrative expenses increased in line with sales volumes and due to strategic investments in people and technology.

Net earnings were $19.6 million compared to $26.2 million in the prior year. Basic earnings per share were $1.64.

Adjusted earnings per share, adjusted for foreign exchange and share-based compensation, were $2.08 compared to $1.60 in the first quarter of 2025. Adjusted EBITDA was $41.0 million in the first quarter, as compared to $30.9 million in the first quarter of 2025.

Cash generated by operating activities was $11.4 million in the quarter. Working capital increased, primarily due to higher accounts receivable tied to strong sales in March, while inventory levels stabilized after the increases we saw throughout 2025.

We continue to invest in the business. Capital expenditures were $8.7 million in the quarter, primarily directed to capacity expansion initiatives.

Net debt at the end of the first quarter was $18.1 million as compared to $15.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2025. Net working capital as a percentage of sales improved in the quarter versus the first quarter of 2025 and also versus the fourth quarter of 2025.

This is a result of greater organizational focus on inventory management. We are pleased with these first quarter results, which set new records in terms of sales and profitability.

We continue to take advantage of market segment tailwinds while managing the economic headwinds. As always, we are focused on superior operational and financial execution while continuing to plan for strategic growth beyond transformers.

Thank you for listening in today. With that, I'll hand the call back to the operator to begin the question-and-answer period.

As a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question at this time, please press *11 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press *11 again.

Hi, morning, guys. Thanks for taking my question.

Maybe just one on backlog, up 4% quarter-over-quarter in Q1 after being up 74% in Q4. How should we be thinking about backlog growth for the year?

Then can you talk about the lumpiness of some of these big contracts you're bidding on in the context of how that might affect backlog timing?

Sure, Matt. It's Richard.

The 4% increase, look, as we had very large backlog increases late last year. We were happy to see a continuation of that.

I think that is a reflection of strong quotation activity. I think, looking forward, I think it sets a good foundation for the remainder of the year for us.

Could we see another step-change function in the next couple quarters? Like another big jump from here?

It's hard to say, Matt, because a lot of this depends on capacity and lead times and a lot of these projects are larger than they have been in the past, particularly when they're connected to data centers. Capacity matters in these cases.

Great. Then maybe could you share some color on how bidding activity is currently just in general?

I feel like we read every day about how new data center projects are coming up, but how has that affected bidding activity? Is it stronger than last year, weaker?

Any sort of references there?

Hey, Matt, it's Adrian. I think what we saw, really, I would say starting from maybe kind of early last year, we saw a lot more activity on some of these significant projects.

I think as we talked about the backlog when we finished Q4, a lot of that came from talking early on with customers how we're building out capacity. That demand stays intact.

We're still seeing significant quotation activity.

Okay. Thanks, guys.

I'll pass the line.

Thanks. Morning, guys.

Coming back to your answer on the backlog and related to capacity, can you guys comment a little bit about how you're thinking about that? I know in the MD&A you mentioned that you're still expanding existing footprint to accommodate more, but what does that look like going forward over the next 12, 24, 36 months?

When would we have to hear about a new potential facility in order to address backlog or even the ability to add new things into the backlog?

Hey, good morning, Nick. It's Richard.

The way we've communicated this in the past is, we've just launched Mon 4. We think with that we have sufficient capacity through to 2027.

The question right now is, how much capacity will we need beyond that, and where will it be located, and for what type of products? We're going through that evaluation process right now, but given that it takes anywhere from a year and a half to 2 years to set up a new facility, we will have to be making those decisions in the remainder of this year.

So.

Okay. As you're doing that evaluation, are you able to comment at all on the type of visibility you would need to see?

Would you have to have some form of an order or a conversation with these vendors to suggest that that is in fact going to be in hand once you do this, like a chicken and egg? Or is there some risk that you will be taking in order to kind of take that next step?

There's two factors that I think you should think about, Nick. One, a big factory is a step change.

What we showed over the last 4 years with a lot of our CapEx is putting more capacity into existing footprint. We have two new factories, we can continue to optimize our footprint there, as well as some operational efficiencies in other areas.

That will bridge the gap between the next time we need to build out a new factory. I think there's a couple things to think about on the new factory demand.

Certainly long-cycle data center projects give us more comfort. If you step back and you think about the electrification tailwind, we still believe that there's a significant amount of electrification and infrastructure upgrades and retrofits that need to be done over the next 10 to 20 years.

I think the visibility to demand certainly gives us confidence, but we think that the long-term trend will provide the need for additional capacity going forward. We still think that there's a lot of non-data center demand over the long term.

Okay. That longer sort of non-data center demand, does the product suite that you have currently address that?

Or I guess another way to put it, the production facilities that you have right now, is the mix between standard stock and custom appropriate, or would you have to maybe switch some of the standard stock capacity into custom? Could that be like a spillover effect where you get a little bit more advantage by 2030, let's say, where you're doing custom work that would be applicable to the electrification of everything in traditional energy as well as in data centers?

For custom product, the equipment and skill set is fairly flexible. Whether it's for oil and gas, for mining, for data centers, similar equipment.

It's flexible in that. It's less flexible between the smaller standard products and the custom, but on anything that's electro-intensive, we have a lot of flexibility in how we use the equipment and how we deploy our workforce.

Okay. Thanks.

Then last for me, there's a line in the MD&A talking about a little bit of softness seen in Canada. I'm curious if you can expand on that a little bit, please, just to share with things like mining, oil and gas, traditional construction, infrastructure.

Are those buckets contracting at all, or is it just softness year-over-year that you think is transitory and will kind of get reversed as we enter the summer?

Look, I think Canada's had some struggles with the economy, particularly around sectors like auto and some of the other areas that we've seen impacts recently. I believe that's driving sort of a slower economic growth in Canada.

I think that's what we're seeing there. While there are data center projects in Canada, it's not to the same extent as the US, I think Canada is not benefiting from that extreme buildout that the US is benefiting from.

If you go to commercial construction, I would say, on that side, we see softness there.

Understood. Thanks, guys.

Hey, good morning. Just given the structural tailwinds, could you just elaborate on how your view of the AEG acquisition has evolved?

Just particularly around North American cross-selling, and how we should think about the potential investment needed to support commercial entry?

Hey, Baltej, it's Adrian. It hasn't closed, I think we'll kind of refrain a little bit, but what I can say is that, what the original thesis of what we believe and the fact that they have released products which are applicable for North America, I think it strengthens our opportunity post-closing to support the deployment of products into the North American market space.

Great. Then just as a follow-up on that, how is the transaction progressing?

I know that you're getting regulatory approvals and you anticipate to get the remainder of them as well. Are we still anticipating a Q2 close?

We still feel comfortable that we'll be able to close in Q2. Obviously, with regulatory approvals, time frames are not under our control, but we believe it's likely.

Great. Just one more from me, just given the shift towards higher-voltage data center architecture, are you seeing this reflected in the recent mix of orders that you're putting into the backlog?

The biggest thing that we see reflected in our backlog mix, Baltej, is just higher capacity, in general.

Great. Thanks, I'll leave it there.

Great. Thanks, and good morning, everyone.

Can you just touch on some of the tariff changes you've seen in the industry? I know there's the changes in Section 232.

Can you just talk about the impact and whether there's any kind of near-term impact on gross margins as a result of those changes?

Good morning, Nelson. It's Richard.

I'll just summarize what the changes are. Where the original tariffs were a tariff on metal content, the new tariffs are a flat tariff on the value of the whole product, which in many ways simplifies the tariff structure.

One of the things, what's a little bit different is the way those particular products get picked up in terms of HS codes. There are more products that get picked up under the 232 tariffs than there were before.

That will drive more tariffs. As we've talked many times in the past, the effect of that is that it could create, all other things being equal, a drag on margins for a short period of time while we adjust.

We'll probably see that pattern happen again. I think what we've been able to demonstrate, though, over time is that we have an ability to deal with these kinds of cost changes, and so we'll be doing that again.

Thanks for that. Then just on AEG, I know you haven't closed the deal yet, but do you have a good sense of how their revenues in Q1 looked?

I know for Hammond specifically, most of your growth is in the US, and you saw kind of roughly flat results in Canada. Given that AEG is in Europe and in Asia and other parts, how have revenues been in Q1, just at high level?

Nelson, hey, it's Adrian. I don't think it's appropriate for us to disclose anything until the deal is closed.

Okay. Then just moving on to Canada, you guys highlighted that revenues were roughly flat year-over-year due to some weakness.

Do you have the flexibility to change the type of transformers you sell or can you divert a lot of the product or have products been diverted to the US where there's more demand? Can you just talk about the dynamics in terms of whether you can just export or reallocate where you sell your products?

Good question, Nelson. Products for North America, there are some nuance between Canada and US in terms of codes and standards, but they're essentially very similar and so both from an engineering and production standpoint, allocating production for US, Canada, or Mexico is quite easy.

We support all three countries from the same set of factories.

Great. Then just on your revenue capacity, I think in the past you talked about how by the end of this year you'll have roughly I think $1.2 billion of revenue capacity.

Is that right?

That's right, yeah.

Is there a rule of thumb in terms of CapEx expansion relative to the revenue potential it brings? Is it roughly like a 5 to 1 ratio or how do you think about CapEx expansion?

In the past, we've communicated some of this. In some of our past facilities, typically kind of $20-$25 million investments kind of will realize revenues of roughly $100 million.

It's roughly the profile.

Great. I'll leave it there.

Thank you.

Thank you, operator. As we move through 2026, our focus will remain on disciplined execution, operational improvement, and delivering long-term value for our shareholders.

Thank you, everyone, for your questions today and for your continued interest in Hammond Power Solutions. I'd also like to thank our employees for their dedication, our customers for their trust, and our shareholders for your continued support.