Good morning everybody from a sunny, cold, and snowy Helsinki. Welcome to Kalmar's Financial Statements Review 2025 webcast.

My name is Carina Geber-Teir, and I'm heading the Investor Relations at Kalmar. Today's result will be presented by our President and CEO, Sami Niiranen, and CFO, Sakari Ahdekivi.

We have a Q&A session in the end of this presentation where you can ask questions. I would like to remind you that the webcast is recorded, and it will be found on Kalmar's Investor Relations website later today.

Please also pay attention to the disclaimer as we will be making forward-looking statements. We are now ready to start the presentation.

Please, Sami, the floor is yours.

Thank you very much, Carina, and good morning everyone from Helsinki. It's my pleasure to present Kalmar's fourth quarter 2025 results.

Starting with the highlights: In 2025, Kalmar continued its successful performance in an environment characterized by geopolitical turmoil and trade tensions. During these unpredictable times, we demonstrated resilience and performed well in many areas.

Our orders growth was strong, sales development was stable, and we improved in profitability. Our focus of becoming a service-driven company remained while we continued investments into world-class sustainable innovations.

The fourth quarter was a strong finish to the year. I will cover the main outcomes of the financials here and cover the details in the following slides.

Firstly, our orders increased with 5% to a record level of €511 million, boosted by a few sizable equipment orders in the quarter. We are proud to report that our sales grew by 11% to €487 million.

We saw a stable demand environment in the last quarter of the year, which was in line with the previous quarter. The overall demand remained good despite continued market uncertainty.

Profitability improved. Comparable operating profit reached €60.5 million and represented 12.4% of sales.

Operating cash flow for the quarter was also strong. It was positively impacted by a decrease in inventories.

Then looking at 2026, we expect Kalmar's comparable operating profit to be above 12.5%, and Sakari will cover the guidance in more detail in the financial section of this presentation. Let's now take a closer look at the profitability for the fourth quarter.

As you can see in the comparable operating profit bridge on the right, our profitability was positively impacted by higher volumes and successful cost management during the quarter. We maintained a solid comparable operating profit margin, which increased to 12.4% compared to the comparison period.

This improvement was delivered despite the negative impact of both tariffs and the result from our associated company, Bruks Siwertell. Let's now move to orders development, which were on a record level across both our segments.

Equipment orders increased by 5%, primarily boosted by a few sizable orders, as mentioned earlier. I will cover some of the announced orders for the fourth quarter later in this presentation.

Services orders also hit the new record level, and orders were strong across the whole services portfolio, driven by recurring business, renewals, and new won contracts. Services orders increased to a new record level of €166 million, which is a 6% improvement.

The overall demand for Kalmar's offering remained relatively stable compared to the previous quarter. We will look at the geographical breakdown of these orders on the next slide.

Then finally, the order book remained solid. This slide shows you the geographical split of orders across our new reporting segments: the Americas, EMEA, and APAC.

The fourth quarter's orders received were driven by the Americas, with a few sizable orders pushing the orders up by 18% in this region. Despite the strong improvement in the Americas, the demand environment for our distribution end-customers in the Americas was still hampered by trade tensions, causing slowness in decision-making.

Nevertheless, the Americas orders increased by 17% in 2025. In EMEA, we saw a decline in orders received during Q4, which is explained by the timing of large orders in the comparison period.

However, full-year orders for EMEA grew by 3%. Within APAC, the order intake was stable for the quarter and showed a 10% improvement for the full year.

Then looking at the overall demand environment: Ports and terminals end-customer segment remained on a good level, whereas manufacturing and heavy logistics were sequentially stable during the fourth quarter, and the distribution end-customer segment continued to be impacted by market uncertainty. Now let's review our sales performance, which demonstrated favorable development throughout 2025.

During the fourth quarter, sales increased by 11% to €487 million. Both segments contributed, each growing by 11%.

Services share of sales were on a stable level at 33% during the fourth quarter and 35% in 2025, up by 2 percentage points year-on-year. This is well in line with one of our strategic pillars called growing services.

Now let me show you how our sales performed across our three geographical regions. We saw positive sales development in all regions during the quarter.

In both EMEA and the Americas, sales grew, driven by growth in both segments. However, for the full year, the Americas was impacted by prolonged market uncertainty, a factor visible in the full-year sales figures.

Within the APAC region, the equipment segment performed well, driving the sales up by 16%. Overall, sales in APAC also improved in 2025, driven by equipment and services segments.

The positive momentum in our Eco portfolio continued. The share of total sales for our low-carbon solutions, covering electric, hybrid, and sustainable services, rose to 43%, and the order intake share was at 42%.

This clearly demonstrates the increase in customer demand for these offerings. Furthermore, the fully electric machines' share of equipment orders for the last 12 months increased to 11%, up from 9% a year ago.

Our key innovations during the fourth quarter included a launch of a new comprehensive range of Kalmar DC charging solutions and next-generation lithium-ion battery solution for Kalmar's electric straddle carriers, which has been introduced also to our counterbalance equipment portfolio in Q3 2025. Kalmar has a well-diversified business portfolio globally, with four end-customer segments that performed well in 2025.

The only exception was the distribution segment, our largest end-customer segment in the Americas, which was impacted by prolonged market uncertainty throughout 2025. As I've already mentioned, services share of sales reached 35%.

The services segment continues to bring stability to our total revenues, providing resilience for Kalmar. Our Eco portfolio remains an important driver towards our climate target, which is part of our performance targets until 2028.

The sales of the Eco portfolio remained high, landing at 44% of total sales. Our successful results in 2025 were achieved by our team of 5,300 passionate employees worldwide who are dedicated to executing our strategy.

We demonstrated a strong ability to adapt to changing circumstances in 2025, which provides us with a strong foundation for 2026, even as the market environment remains unpredictable. Let's now look at 2026 from a macroeconomic standpoint, which is one of the hot topics at the moment.

The current macroeconomic uncertainty, driven by geopolitical tensions, leads to increased volatility in economic data, making it difficult to provide long-term forecasts. However, as this data shows, based on external indicators, the market in 2025 has been more resilient than previously anticipated.

IMF increased its global GDP forecast again in October compared to July 2025. Also, Drewry has again upgraded its container throughput forecast for 2025 to above 6% and for 2026 to 2.1%.

Oxford Economics has also upgraded the global manufacturing forecast upwards for 2025 and 2026 since June. The only exception is the global retail output development, for which the 2026 forecast has been revised downwards to 2.2% from 2.7% in September 2025.

However, this represents a slight acceleration in growth compared to 2025, which was 2.1%. Then building on the external market estimates from the previous slide, let's look at the current demand outlook for Kalmar.

We anticipate that the total market demand for the next six months remains approximately at the similar level to what we saw in the second half of 2025. It goes without saying that trade tensions and increased geopolitical instability could have an impact on our markets and the demand from our four end-customer segments.

Now I would like to give you an update on the status of Kalmar's fleet activity, which remained on a good level in 2025. Compared to the third quarter of the year, we saw an uptick in North America towards the end of the fourth quarter in 2025.

Our installed base has grown steadily to over 70,000 machines, from 68,000. At the end of 2025, we had over 16,800 connected equipment globally, compared to 14,500 equipment at the end of 2024.

Then if you look at the regions, we see a positive trend year-on-year, indicating increased activity at our customers' sites during the year. However, there are also some variations, as you can see, in terms of the Latin America quarter-to-quarter development, which was impacted by market uncertainties mentioned earlier.

As I promised, let's cover some of the highlights from our published orders during the quarter. Within equipment segment, we agreed on 16 hybrid straddle carriers to Transnet Port Terminals in Cape Town and Port Elizabeth in South Africa; three Kalmar hybrid straddle carriers to Forth Ports' Grangemouth, Scotland in United Kingdom; and 30 hybrid straddle carriers to Maher Terminals' marine container terminal in New Jersey in US.

In services, we concluded a 10-year strategic supply agreement with Patrick Terminals for Brisbane AutoStrad Terminal in Australia; a modernization services agreement to relocate and modify two ZPMC ship-to-shore cranes with EUROGATE for its container terminal Wilhelmshaven in Germany; and an agreement with OSTP Finland for the delivery of five Kalmar medium forklift trucks with a five-year Essential Care maintenance contract for the machines; and a three-year Kalmar Complete Care service agreement with Yilport Oslo Terminal Investments AS in Norway. Then, let's continue to sustainable innovations, which remained high on our agenda in 2025.

The year was filled with notable innovations, which were manifested in multiple milestones during the year. Here, I will present a few of those.

During the year, we expanded our electric offering. An example of this is the official start of sales of Kalmar's third-generation electric terminal tractor in North America.

Within electrification, we launched next-generation lithium-ion battery technology for our electric counterbalance equipment portfolio and electric straddle carriers. Furthermore, we kicked off a five-year Move to Green R&D program and were granted €20 million funding from Business Finland Leading Company competition.

Moreover, the construction work of our new innovation test center in Ljungby, Sweden started during the year. In automation, we expanded our offering.

An example of this is automation-as-a-service, which is a subscription-based model designed to ensure successful and efficient deployment of automation in marine container terminals and intermodal sites. Another example of automation is a flexible, scalable Kalmar One automation system introduced as a standalone solution in 2025.

With this, we are responding to the increasing demand from customers for a modular, OEM- and equipment-type agnostic fleet management solutions. Moving into a short summary of financial highlights before handing over to Sakari: The fourth quarter was a strong finish to the year, with a record order intake and solid sales growth.

Both equipment and services orders increased, boosted by a few sizable orders within the equipment segment. Services orders were strong throughout the entire services portfolio, and sales improved in both segments.

The shortfall of the quarter was the services margin development, ending up at 16.2%, impacted by tariffs. Tariff-related impacts were proactively mitigated in the equipment segment, and Sakari will provide a more detailed view on the margin development for both segments shortly.

At the end of 2025, Kalmar was in a good financial position to capture the growth in 2026 despite the continued uncertain market environment. Finally, I would like to wrap up my part by highlighting that we remain committed to our strategic priorities and driving sustainable growth by leading the industry with innovations towards automation and electrification, expanding our services business and presence, and pursuing operational excellence to ensure long-term value creation in line with our 2028 targets.

I will now hand over to Sakari, thank you for listening.

Thank you, Sami, and good morning to everyone also from my side. Let's start with our traditional slide on the financial profile of Kalmar.

I'll do some comparisons to the targets that Sami just was showing. For the orders received in 2025, we achieved an 8% growth, and also when we compare the orders and sales, we can see that we have strengthened the order book, and the order book is close to €1 billion at a healthy level.

Due to the good operational execution and successful management of our costs, our comparable operating profit margin was 12.8%. That's up 0.2% compared to the previous year and moves us closer to the 15% target that we have set out for 2028.

Our balance sheet has been further strengthened. Our leverage ratio was actually at 0.0 now times EBITDA, and that's of course clearly lower than our target of less than 2 times.

Finally, with the strong cash flow in the fourth quarter, our cash conversion for the last 12 months, or the full-year '25, was 89%. Then, moving into the segments for a little bit more detail there: The equipment segment saw a strong quarter.

The orders received increased by 5%. That may not sound like a really high number, but I think it's important to remember that we had a very strong quarter also in Q4 of the previous year, the comparison was already a tough one.

The orders were, as Sami said, driven by a few sizable orders, but overall also the order intake across the business was good. Sales was also strong, again, compared to a strong comparison period in 2024.

During the fourth quarter, orders increased in the Americas, while we saw a decline in orders in EMEA, and APAC remained stable. Equipment sales increased by 11%.

The equipment segment's profitability improved in absolute terms by 24% in the quarter compared to 2024 Q4. As you can see from the bridge on the right-hand side, this was as a result of higher volumes and also lower fixed costs in the quarter.

The comparable operating profit margin was at 13.6%. We proactively mitigated the majority of the tariff-related impacts, although they still had some negative impact on some of the margins in our product lines.

Then moving on to service: Services orders received increased by 6% in the quarter and totaled €166 million. The order intake was strong across the entire service portfolio, driven by recurring business, renewals, and won contracts in the previous quarter.

On the sales side, the fourth quarter sales increased by 11% despite market turbulence and totaled €163 million, which was mainly driven by volumes as opposed to price. Services segment comparable operating profit was one of the lowlights of the quarter, remained flat in absolute terms, and the operating profit margin was at 16.2%, which actually represented a decrease of 1.3 percentage points.

This decrease was mainly driven by tariffs, and of course it goes without saying that our focus remains on mitigating actions related to tariffs and also otherwise driving the profitability of our service segment going forward. Speaking of tariffs, the tariff landscape is largely unchanged from previous quarter.

However, of course, we continue to monitor that closely, and we, of course, cannot be sure what happens in the future in these terms. As in the previous quarters, our responses to tariffs have included mitigating actions with price increases, supply chain actions, driving excellence, and other operational excellence initiatives in our operations.

Which takes me nicely to our Driving Excellence program. This is one of my favorite themes, and we have of course achieved good results here.

The execution of Driving Excellence, which was launched back in 2024, is proceeding as planned, and our target is to reach €50 million of gross efficiency improvements by the end of 2026. In 2025, we made good progress with the implementation of Driving Excellence, and by the end of the fourth quarter, we achieved a run rate of approximately €34 million of annualized gross efficiency improvements.

As before, the majority of these improvements were secured from sourcing activities. Then moving on to the balance sheet side or towards that, return on capital employed was now at 23%, and as you can see, this has been climbing now.

The ROCE number is now clean of the demerger-related items affecting comparability, which have been there in the previous quarters. This represents in that sense kind of a comparable or clean level of ROCE at 23%.

As you remember, our target long-term is over 25. As I mentioned in the beginning of my section, our balance sheet was further strengthened during the quarter, with a leverage ratio now of 0 and gearing of 0.7.

The decline in interest-bearing net debt, which improved our leverage ratio, was primarily as a result of strong cash generations from operations in the quarter, and this allowed us also to partially repay some of our loans from financial institutions during Q4. Looking at the maturity profile, I would like to highlight that we refinanced €100 million and prepaid €50 million of our loans from financial institutions.

In addition, we exercised the first one-year extension option of our €200 million long-term revolving credit facility, extending maturity now to 2030. Cash flow was strong in the fourth quarter.

It was in euro terms €113 million, which was of course clearly up from both previous year and the previous quarter. The improvement was driven firstly by profitability, but also by a clear decrease in inventories during the quarter, and cash conversion for the last 12 months was 89%.

We concluded the year with solid financials, as you can see. As a result, the Board of Directors proposes to the Annual General Meeting that of the distributable profit, a dividend of €1.10 for each class B share and €1.09 for each class A share to be paid for the financial year 2025.

This equals to €71 million in total. Our earnings per share for the year was €2.55, which was up from the previous year at €1.99.

The effective dividend yield is 2.7%. The record date of the dividend is proposed to be the 2nd of April, '26, and the payment date the 13th of April, 2026.

Just to iterate that the dividend proposal for the financial year is in line with our dividend policy of between 30 and 50% payout ratio. Then, as Sami already said, our guidance for the full-year 2026 is that Kalmar expects its comparable operating profit margin to be above 12.5% of sales.

That concludes my part of the presentation. We'll move to Q&A.

Thank you.

Okay. Thank you, Sami and Sakari.

Now I think we are ready and handing over to the operator for questions.

Good morning guys. Thanks for taking my questions.

I have three. I'll start with the demand outlook for the first half, and I understand that this is not a guidance for your order intake, but if I look at kind of the second half situation, am I right in understanding that on Q3 it was a bit of a weak quarter in terms of timing of large orders, while on Q4 it was stronger?

On average, that is a good representation of order intake in a flattish demand environment?

Yep. Thank you, Antti.

That's how it is, and it's quite typical in our business that we have volatility between the quarters, and you could see it quite clearly in Q3 and Q4. Overall, when it comes to the demand outlook for the next six months that we indicated there, of course, the underlying market demand, that's how we see it pretty much unchanged at the moment, of course, but keeping in mind the uncertainties that are around.

Also, of course, that it's not a direct parallel of what we expect then in orders. It's demand outlook, not an orders guidance.

Yes, I do understand that, but obviously kind of Q4 you had a strong quarter on the larger orders compared to Q3, but on average it's fairly something that you would expect typically.

We need to look at a longer period, I would say. We cannot pinpoint to different quarters, and not even the six-month period.

I think if you look at the year-on-year, for instance, 2024, 2025, and the fluctuation between the quarters, I think then you can see some kind of pattern there.

All right, that's clear. Then the second question is on kind of the two negative profitability impacts that you flag here: the tariff impact on the services margins, and then the negative impact from the Bruks Siwertell.

Do you want to give any color on quantity of these impacts on the quarter and how should we think about both of those going forward?

If I touch upon the tariffs, and especially affecting services profitability, I would say that we had an internal calculation error in Q3, therefore you can see the difference between Q3 and Q4 result. That worsened our result in Q4.

Overall, of course, we are living in this tariff landscape, which is affecting our business both on equipment and services and continues to do so. Overall, of course, what we have said is that we don't think that the tariffs will go away short-term at least.

We need to live with those. I think we have been managing our business in a very good way, but of course now it's visible in our Q4 services.

Then maybe you want to...

Maybe building a little bit on what Sami was saying, I think when you look at the services profitability, you should probably look at Q3 and Q4 together, and that would represent probably the correct level, but there is a bit of a movement there between the quarters. Then on Bruks Siwertell, yes, Bruks Siwertell was a loss-making unit in Q4, and if we look at the annual impact, it's also a loss provider for us in the full year.

To quantify, because this is also then in the financial statements, it was a -€3 million for the full-year 2025, whereas in '24, it was a positive €5 million, so that's quite a big difference, actually. There was a loss in Q4, whereas in Q3 there was actually a profit.

Also when we look at the other segment where this profit contribution resides, it does swing that to some extent as well.

On both of those, if it was a bit of an internal error on the services side, is that something that you could react quite quickly and that would start to go away already on Q1? Also on the Bruks Siwertell side, what's the reason for such a swing on the profitability?

Is something that you can address quickly, or is it something that will maybe linger on a bit longer?

On the services and this internal calculation error, that was in Q3, Q4, so that has been mitigated already, but of course the tariffs are not going away or have not gone away, of course. We need to live with those, there will be a bit of possibly dilution even going forward.

Of course, and then maybe commenting on services margin overall, 17.6% for the entire year, of course we cannot be satisfied with that one, coming from 17.5% the year before. Of course, despite the tariffs, of course, it should have been a little bit better.

On the associated company side, we expect that to turn back to profit.

Okay. Then the final one is on capital allocation.

Very strong cash flow for the quarter, for the year. You have a very strong balance sheet.

In your opinion, kind of I'm just thinking, do you need such a strong balance sheet for the business that you currently hold, given there's not high M&A ambitions and very limited CapEx needs? How should we think about kind of capital allocation and shareholder distribution going forward?

Just stick with the current dividend payout scheme, or has there been any other discussions?

I think this is our second time now, and of course what we have said that we want to be a good dividend payer, and the range is 30 to 50%. We are still quite a new company in that respect.

Of course, that is one key area for our capital allocation in our current strategy, which is an organic strategy. The other key focus areas of course are our strategic pillars, basically meaning R&D investments, which was 3.1% in 2025, and then of course reinvesting back to services as well, and keeping our facilities, premises in a good shape throughout the globe.

That is our current organic strategy.

Appreciate that, but surely kind of your cash generation on a quarterly basis is strong enough to take care of those maintenance CapEx, investments, and things like that. I'm just thinking kind of as you move operationally with the improvements, will there be a time that you would look at M&A a little bit more constructively?

As said, now we are executing our current strategy as good as we can. Of course, we are happy with the progress so far after 1.5 years basically.

Then of course, if there will be changes to our strategy in the months or years to come, of course we will communicate it then. I think to have a strong cash position at the moment and generating cash, I think it's beneficial as well.

Thank you very much. That's all from me.

I was going to say the same goes for the payout ratio, no change expected at this point.

Yes, hi. Good morning, everybody, and thanks for taking my questions.

On the demand situation, now I appreciate your guidance here, which is obviously good and describes the underlying demand and that, but as you said, it's not necessarily an indication of your particular orders. I'm just wondering if you could talk a bit about what kind of a sales funnel do you see currently on the equipment side?

What is the activity there? What are the sizes, the potentials, deals?

Which regions and segments are most active, and so on. Maybe a bit of a color on what you see in your project pipeline or sales funnel.

That's a good question. Thank you.

I think overall the pipeline is healthy, as it has been in the past quarters as well. Then it of course varies between different regions, as well as different end-customer segments.

For instance, ports and terminals has been, I would say, quite positive during 2025 and Q4 as well, whereas on the other side, the distribution end-customer segment, mainly in the Americas, affecting our sales or orders in Americas, has been slow still. Then heavy logistics as well as manufacturing have been quite stable, I would say.

That kind of sentiment we expect to continue. We can look at the external indicators that we just reported as well when it comes to container throughput, that is supposed to come a little bit down, but it's still on a positive side after two really good years there.

Then the distribution slowness is still visible, of course, in those numbers as well. That's what we see.

The destocking that we talked about maybe one year ago with the dealer stock and affecting our terminal tractor business, that is gone. The inventory levels are good, but the uncertainties cause the slowness in our terminal tractors sales still in Americas.

Then I think Europe has been strong so far, we expect Europe to continue strong, and of course services is a big part of our success there. Then I would say Americas now, compared to the rather weak comparison period, of course it increased, which is delighting.

We had today announced the good horizontal transportation straddle carrier order, big one over there, so that is a little bit picking up there, but it's too early to say whether Americas, including South America, will continue growing. We will watch and monitor, of course, the situation.

What we can say today is that for the next six months, we see the underlying demand pretty stable compared to the H2 2025.

Still about the Americas and talking to the frontlines there, what they say is that the customers are cautiously resilient, which means that there are some investments, but there is also uncertainty, and everything that goes on in geopolitics has an impact on the decision-making.

Then I guess as we clearly see from our Q3 and Q4 orders that it can be pretty lumpy, even if the underlying demand doesn't really change that much.

Yep.

Right. No, that's helpful.

Thank you. Then just on the service side of the business: Very good growth reported there in the orders, mid-single-digit growth despite these uncertainties here and there; also fairly good fleet activity based on the chart you provided.

Looking ahead, is there anything you can say about the fleet activity in the early parts of 2026? What have you seen there?

Any changes? The trends are still fairly positive?

Also, what is your confidence level in continuing to grow the service business mid-single digits going in 2026 as well?

Especially talking about the activity in in the Americas, the fleet activity, unfortunately it's too early to say whether the uptick in the end of the year The January has not been as strong as as the end of end of the year, and you see lumpiness also very much based on on some of the the kind of commentary on the geopolitics and so forth. It's too early to call kind of that the uptick would be stable for a longer time.

Yeah. If I continue on services and growing services, it is and will remain, whatever strategy we have, as one of the strategic pillars definitely.

We want to grow further. I'm happy with the top-line growth in services.

I think that developed well, but of course on the margin side, we had a bit of pressure there. Both areas, orders, as well as the profitability, will be a key focus area going forward, and we see a lot of opportunities there.

Of course, the market is large for services to capture.

Yes, of course. Just to be clear on the comment on the activity levels, was that on Americas specifically that you commented on?

On the North America.

Okay. Great.

Thank you. Then just finally, on the Driving Excellence program, €50 million gross savings targeted by the end of 2026: Just wondering if you could provide a bit more details there.

What were the net savings that you achieved in 2025? I think you're saying here that it's mainly attributable to supply chain rationalization, I would assume that a lot of that actually flows through to the bottom line.

Wondering if you have that figure, the net savings impact in '25, and also what we should expect incrementally going into 2026?

If I start, I think it's really difficult to give you a net savings number because, of course, the actions that we do in Driving Excellence then result in the gross efficiency improvements that we report run rate. Then there are so many other things.

Tariffs is one thing, of course this is one way of mitigating the tariffs. Then there's the pricing element, what is actually the net impact of the Driving Excellence alone?

I don't think there is kind of a net impact from that. Because it gets mixed up in everything else that's going on.

Okay. Thank you.

Hi, thank you. I just wanted to ask still on the tariff impact on the services.

Kind of, what is the underlying issue there? Is it that you import spare parts to the US and cannot increase the price enough, and maybe on the magnitude of this issue?

It seems that it was quite severe in the US, given that there was significant impact on the whole services and US is not whole of that service. Could you kind of talk a bit more about what is the problem and how soon can you mitigate that?

That's a good question. Exactly, that's where it is.

It's coming from that we are bringing parts and the components, which have steel, aluminum, different kind of content, of course, to the US, and they are exposed to tariffs, and that's what we need to mitigate. Of course, we talk about quite high increases.

Overall, including everything, both equipment and service, we talk about 5 to 18% price increases that we have implemented trying to mitigate those tariff actions, but we haven't been able to mitigate fully even to the parts. If I give you a bit of magnitude for the entire year, if you look at our profitability of 17.6%, without net tariff impact, we would have been closer to 18%.

Oh,

okay. Thank you.

Going forward, do you just try to increase prices more, or wait for the tariffs to be lowered, or what is the kind of solution for this? Or is it permanently at this level going forward?

That's how we see it now. No change in the tariff landscape compared to Q4, basically we have been increasing our prices.

We try to be on top of that situation all the time. Of course, it's very complex situation when we are bringing parts from different sources, of course, and we need to know exactly, okay, what is the different material content there.

I think we have been managing this well. The only thing was this internal calculation error between Q3 and Q4, but that will continue definitely, and now we have mitigated that one, I think I'm confident on delivering parts to our customers with the right pricing as from now.

The target is of course to fully mitigate the tariffs.

Thank you.

Hi. Thanks for taking one follow-up, which is on the order growth in Americas and on a group level on '25.

How much of that is kind of tariff-related pricing gains in Americas if the full-year orders there are up was it 17%, and on a group level 10%? How much is price and how much is volume?

Let's say if we start with services, I think on the services, when they started in Q2, I think the growth in services in Americas is almost everything coming from price increases, I would say, not from volume. That's with the services.

On the equipment side in Americas...

There are of course large orders in the Americas, which is I think the primary driver there, of course pricing to some extent as well.

Is there any kind of a figure regarding kind of equipment sold in the US, how much the prices that your offering have gone up during the year because of the tariff impacts?

I would say, on the equipment side in general, I think we talk about 5 to 10%.

All right. As a conclusion, you still have kind of volume growth both in Americas and on a group level on the equipment side in demand in '25?

Correct. Yes.

Yeah. If you look at the latest order that we published today, the Maher, the USA order, of course that's a major order also driving growth compared to Q4 last year.

Absolutely. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. Just a very brief follow-up: I was thinking about your tariff slide there, and you talk about the Poland assembly.

How big part of the components are sourced from China there, and what are the alternatives for you to change that sourcing, just trying to figure out what you can do to mitigate tariffs here?

Sorry, you were referring to Chinese or?

Parts.

Yes, exactly. If you look at your assembly in Poland, I guess you're sourcing parts and components from China, which are subject to tariffs, and just wondering what you can do to mitigate that, what are the alternatives for sourcing here?

Of course, we have a high focus on sourcing, and all the time we look at the so-called dual sourcing opportunities, and that's what we have been doing for a long time already, and I think that is the way to go. Of course, we need to have different alternatives there.

When it comes to, let's say, the components, material coming from China to US, we don't talk about big numbers there. It's a very low double-digit number, I think, at the moment.

We are not exposed to huge risk or price increase there.

It depends on which component we are talking about, of course. Then there are some batteries and so forth that are, but almost everybody is in the same situation there.

In that perspective, the kind of majority of the parts are not originated from China that we source. It's a very, very complex landscape, and the different tariffs, you have the reciprocal ones, and then you have the steel and aluminum, and there are a lot of contradictory messages out there how this will be treated.

That is why we keep on kind of building resilience, working on the databases, and being able to be very competitive in this kind of fluid landscape that we don't anticipate to go away.

Right, right. Also just a follow-up on the tariffs discussion here: Obviously, it seems that you're more successful in mitigating that in the equipment business as opposed to service.

I know we talked about what it's about, the components and so on, but is there anything in the competitive landscape that would also lead to you not being able to fully capture or kind of compensate for the tariffs in the service business as opposed to the equipment business?

No, I think like we said, we try to mitigate everything, of course, on the service side with parts, and of course there was a bit of delay, was it in Q2 last year, but of course now when we have implemented those price increases, of course they should mitigate those. Then overall, if you look at the whole tariff landscape, I think we are affected both on the equipment and services side, not huge difference there, I would say.

This shouldn't get mixed up with the Q4 impact versus the Q3, so that was a bit of a different issue. As Sami said, I wouldn't say there's a big difference between equipment and service in mitigation.

Okay. Then just finally on Europe, I think you mentioned that you see fairly good demand picture in Europe.

Just wondering if you could talk a bit about that, where is that strength coming from? Which segments?

Which countries perhaps?

No, I think overall, like we have seen in the past years as well, of course ports and terminals, they have been strong in Europe, then heavy logistics as well as manufacturing. I think those three end-customer segments continue to be attractive for us, whereas distribution end-customer segment is not very big in Europe, of course.

Then I would say services, we have a large fleet operating in Europe, and of course we try to be very active with our customers, we see opportunities on the service side as well.

Great. Thank you very much.

Looking at our installed base of 70,000 equipment and the replacement market on that one, of course that is something that is driving overall our business because the majority, of course, comes from replacement business.

Okay. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Thank you for all the good questions. I think we are now ready to end the session.

Happy to see you online, and happy to meet wherever you are. Just as a final reminder, we will be back here in Q1 2026 with the result publication at the 5th of May.

Thank you for now, and wishing you a nice rest of the day. Thank you.

Thank you.