Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Earlier today, we issued a press release announcing our results for the third quarter and first nine months of 2026 and updated our full year 2026 guidance.

The company's management discussion and analysis and consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 27th, 2026 are expected to be filed with the Canadian Securities Regulatory Authorities and the US Securities and Exchange Commission today, and will also be available on our corporate website. Joining me on the call today are Glenn Chamandy, President and CEO of Gildan; Luca Barile, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer; and Chuck Ward, Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer.

This morning, we'll take you through the results for the quarter, and then a question-and-answer session will follow. Before we begin, please take note that certain statements included in this conference call constitute forward-looking statements, which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

We refer you to the company's filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission and Canadian Securities Regulatory Authorities, including, in the case of our full year 2026 outlook and the risks and assumptions related thereto, our earnings press release dated November 5th, 2026. During this call, we will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures.

Reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS measures are provided in today's earnings release as well as our MD&A. Before I turn it over to Glenn, a few items to note: we may refer to Hanesbrands or Hanes throughout this call.

As announced on October 26, 2026, we completed the sale of Hanesbrands Australia business, which we referred to as HAA. HAA had been classified as held for sale and reported as discontinued operations since the fourth quarter of 2025.

As such, unless otherwise indicated, the figures we will be discussing today are from continuing operations and therefore exclude the results of the HAA business. Now, I'll turn it over to Glenn.

Thank you, Jessy. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us on this call.

As we highlighted in this morning's press release, our results this quarter did not meet our expectations, reflecting a more subdued demand environment and some near-term challenges. The demand recovery we had anticipated did not materialize as expected.

Our third-quarter net sales from continuing operations were $1.47 billion, up 61% versus last year, primarily due to the Hanesbrand acquisition. Adjusted diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were $1.54, up 54% compared to last year.

Our sales came in below our guidance of approximately $1.65 billion, mainly due to greater than anticipated demand softness and unfavorable mix, primarily in wholesale. We also experienced some product availability and service constraints, primarily in retail.

Margins and cash flow held up well, supported in part by tariff refunds. Furthermore, we announced on October 26, 2026, that we completed the sale of HAA for approximately $490 million, paid in cash at closing.

We used the net proceeds from the transaction to repay outstanding debt. Gildan continues to generate strong free cash flow, and we remain committed to disciplined capital allocation, including returning capital to shareholders.

Consistent with this approach, we announced this morning that our board approved a new normal course issuer bid to repurchase up to 5% of the issued outstanding common shares. With respect to our outlook, since we reported our second-quarter results, the macroeconomic environment has changed rapidly.

This morning, we updated our 2026 guidance, and we believe it is prudent to withdraw our previously communicated objectives for 2026 to 2028 period. Let me stress, we believe that the underlying strength and long-term prospects of the business remain strong, and we expect to provide an updated long-term outlook at an Investor Day, which is intended to be held in the spring of 2027.

Now, let me take a few minutes to provide an update on the Hanes integration. We remain on track to generate approximately $100 million in targeted synergies for 2026, and we continue to expect approximately $250 million annual run-rate cost synergies by the end of 2028.

We are pursuing additional opportunities beyond our current targeted as the integration progresses. Since closing the acquisition on December 1st, 2025, we have made tremendous progress bringing the two companies together and building the foundation of the combined companies.

In less than a year, we have moved decisively across virtually every area of the organization. We rationalized our supply chain footprint, announced nine facility closures, we integrated and combined sock manufacturing and supply chain activities.

We transitioned most of the Hanes textiles into Gildan's network and made great progress on consolidating key systems. We completed the sale of HAA.

As we did this, we also focused on bringing innovation, elevation in the manufacturing of Hanes products. What is particularly encouraging is that we accomplished much of the heavy lifting required to establish the foundation of the combined organizations during our first year.

Looking to 2027, our focus will increasingly shift towards optimizing our platform, further integrating processes, and continuing to embed a one-company culture as we focus on realizing the full potential of the combination. In addition, we intend to bring our product innovation pipeline to market, with new, enhanced products expected to roll out progressively through 2027.

Lastly, the buildout of our second facility in Bangladesh, Phase 2, remains a key to our ring-spun and innerwear cost leadership and innovation. It should significantly enhance the company's positioning to support key sales growth drivers, and the production of this second phase is expected to start in 2028.

In closing, we recognize that this quarter fell short of what we expected to deliver, and our updated outlook is not where we want it to be. We are acting decisively on several key aspects of our business, addressing the product availability, service constraints in retail, sharpening execution across our channels, capturing the full value of the Hanes integration, and investing behind our brands.

In the current environment, our priorities remain clear: stay focused on what we control, including leveraging the scale of our business, our manufacturing network, our commercial capabilities, and strengthening the foundation of the combined platform, and continue to invest strategically in innovation and growth. I look forward to answering your questions after our formal remarks, and now, I'll turn it over to Chuck for a commercial review.

Thank you, Glenn, and good morning, everyone. From a commercial and market backdrop perspective, macroeconomic conditions changed rapidly after we reported our second-quarter results.

Rising interest rates and persistent inflation in household essentials weighed on consumer demand for apparel in general. More broadly, the consumer remains challenged.

We are operating in an increasingly K-shaped economy, where higher-income households continue to spend, while lower- and middle-income consumers, who are feeling the cumulative impact of higher prices for everyday essentials and higher borrowing costs, are becoming more selective with discretionary purchases, including apparel. In this environment, consumers are prioritizing value.

Retailers appear to be managing inventories and replenishment more selectively, adjusting future orders where sell-through or category performance is softer, while continuing to replenish categories that are performing well. Retailers are also responding by emphasizing opening price points and smaller pack sizes to maintain affordability, and consumers have shown limited willingness to absorb higher prices.

While this backdrop is weighing on unit volumes in the near term, we believe our low-cost, vertically integrated manufacturing model and our portfolio of brands spanning value to premium position us well to serve consumers across income levels. Looking at our third-quarter net sales from continuing operations of $1.47 billion versus our guidance of approximately $1.65 billion, there were two main factors behind the shortfall.

First, approximately $100 million reflected greater than anticipated demand softness, with the demand recovery assumed in the company's previous outlook not materializing as expected, and unfavorable mix, primarily in wholesale. Against this softer market, our share gains in some channels were also lower than we anticipated.

That said, Comfort Colors, American Apparel, and Champion continued to perform well with our customers. Second, approximately $60 million reflected product availability and service constraints, and were associated with evolving demand in order patterns, primarily in retail.

The balance of the shortfall pertains to lower net selling prices. Weather was also a factor in the quarter.

We experienced exceptionally warm temperatures, including record or near-record heat in several markets in the US and in Europe, which contributed to an unusually warm start to the fall season. This weighed on fleece demand, which softened meaningfully in September, declining to mid-to-high teens.

Because fleece carries a higher average selling price than our basic T-shirt offering, this created an unfavorable impact to our sales mix, and some of that softness carries into Q4, whereas we had expected strong fleece sales during this period. Now, let me update you on the strategic growth initiatives we talked about last quarter, which were already underway and are focused on further strengthening the Hanesbrand portfolio and increasing consumer engagement.

As the environment evolved during the quarter, we continued to take a disciplined approach to reinvesting a portion of the tariff refunds. The key pillars of our strategy remain unchanged: brand elevation, retail marketing programs, and accelerating innovation and packaging enhancements.

However, we shifted some of the spending initially planned for the third quarter into the fourth quarter, while keeping the overall envelope largely the same. Within that, we increased our investment in brand building in the third quarter, where we believe it can deliver the greatest value in the current environment, and we intend to maintain that higher level into the fourth quarter.

As we move into 2027, we have a compelling pipeline of product innovation coming to the market, with a steady flow of new and enhanced offerings throughout the year. The rollout will begin across men's underwear and socks before broadening into women's and kids' categories, bringing improved comfort, fit, and performance alongside refreshed packaging and merchandising.

We believe these innovations will further elevate our core brands and strengthen our offering with consumers and retail partners. With that, I will turn it over to Luca for a financial review.

Thank you, Chuck, and thank you all for joining us today to discuss our third-quarter results. Let me start with the specifics of the quarter, then turn to cash flow and balance sheet items, and our updated 2026 outlook.

First, the quarterly results. We reported third-quarter net sales from continuing operations of $1.47 billion, up 61.1% year-over-year, compared to our guidance of approximately $1.65 billion.

The year-over-year the year-over-year increase reflects the Hanesbrands acquisition, partially offset by lower volumes reflecting the difficult macroeconomic conditions since we reported our second-quarter results, and lower net selling prices. Compared with pro forma net sales from continuing operations of $1.61 billion, the decline was primarily due to lower volumes reflecting softer than anticipated demand trends across both wholesale and retail.

Looking at wholesale, net sales were $735 million, compared to $789 million in the prior year, down 6.8%, and down 10.8% compared to pro forma net sales from continuing operations for wholesale of $823 million in the prior year. The decline in wholesale sales versus pro forma net sales from continuing operations is mainly due to softer demand trends amid the difficult macroeconomic environment, the positive impact of sales in the prior year in anticipation of announced price increases, and to a lesser extent, product mix.

As for retail, net sales were $732 million, compared to $122 million in the prior year, primarily reflecting the acquisition of Hanesbrands. Compared to pro forma net sales from continuing operations of $787 million, retail sales were down 7%, mainly due to softer demand trends amid the difficult macroeconomic environment, as well as product availability and service constraints associated with evolving demand and order patterns.

These factors were partially offset by the wrap-around effect of pricing initiatives implemented after the third quarter of 2025. Shifting to margins, we generated gross profit of $625 million, or 42.6% of net sales, versus $307 million, or 33.7% of net sales, in the same period last year.

Adjusting for an inventory fair value step-up cost of $10 million recorded as part of the Hanesbrands acquisition, adjusted gross profit was $635 million, or 43.3% of net sales, compared to 33.7% in the prior year. The year-over-year improvement mainly reflects a benefit of approximately $177 million in AYEPA tariff refunds, and lower manufacturing and raw material costs.

These factors were partly offset by unfavorable mix and the flow-through of tariff costs in inventory. Excluding the positive impact of AYEPA refunds on gross profit and the offsetting tariffs embedded in our cost of inventory, as well as the reinvestment in strategic initiatives, adjusted gross margin would have been approximately 37% for the third quarter.

SG&A expenses were $240 million, compared to $95 million in the prior year. Adjusted SG&A expenses were $238 million, or 16.3% of net sales, compared to $95 million, or 10.4% of net sales, for the same period last year.

The increase in adjusted SG&A in the quarter primarily reflects the acquisition of Hanesbrands, including the impact of higher amortization of intangible assets and depreciation of property, plant, and equipment resulting from the fair value purchase accounting impacts of the acquisition. In addition, the higher SG&A includes expenditures related to the strategic reinvestments utilizing a portion of AYEPA refunds.

This was partially offset by synergies realized from the Hanesbrands integration process and lower variable compensation. As we bring these elements together, and adjusting for restructuring and acquisition-related costs and the inventory fair value step-up cost as part of the Hanesbrands acquisition, adjusted operating income was $396 million, up $185 million year-over-year.

Adjusted operating margin was 27% of net sales, up 380 basis points versus last year, and 100 basis points ahead of our guidance of approximately 26%. The year-over-year increase reflects higher gross margins and the favorable impact from synergies realized as part of the Hanesbrands integration process, partly offset by Hanesbrands' lower operating margins due to historically higher levels of SG&A relative to Gildan.

Versus guidance, the outperformance mainly reflects a benefit of about 200 basis points from shifting some of the reinvestments of AYEPA tariff refunds into strategic initiatives from the third quarter to the fourth quarter, partly offset by about 100 basis points of greater than anticipated SG&A deleverage on lower than expected third-quarter sales. Net financial expenses were $61 million, up $17 million year-over-year, primarily due to higher borrowing levels related to the Hanesbrands acquisition.

Taking into account these factors and a higher outstanding share base as a result of the acquisition, GAAP diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were $1.37, compared to $0.80 in the prior year. Adjusting for restructuring and acquisition-related costs, the inventory fair value step-up cost, and an income tax recovery of $11 million related to restructuring charges and other adjustments, adjusted diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were $1.54, up 54% from $1 in the prior year.

Now turning to cash flow and balance sheet items for the first nine months of 2026. Cash flows from operating activities, which include discontinued operations, were $701 million, compared to $270 million in the prior year.

After accounting for capital expenditures of $78 million, we generated approximately $622 million of free cash flow. During the first nine months of 2026, we returned $139 million to shareholders through dividends.

We ended the third quarter with long-term debt, including the current portion, of $3.98 billion, net debt of $4.14 billion, and a leverage ratio of 2.7 times net debt to trailing 12 months pro forma adjusted EBITDA. Now turning to the outlook.

For 2026, and with respect to our continuing operations, we are updating our full-year guidance as follows, amid a macroeconomic environment that has changed rapidly since we reported our second-quarter results: Revenue is expected to be in the range of $5.4 billion to $5.5 billion, compared to previous guidance of the low end of $6 billion to $6.2 billion. Full-year adjusted operating margin of approximately 20%, compared to previous guidance of approximately 21.8%.

Adjusted diluted EPS in the range of $3.70 to $3.80, compared to previous guidance of $4.65 to $4.75. CapEx to come in at approximately 3% of net sales.

Free cash flow to be $700 million to $750 million, compared to previous guidance of approximately $1 billion. Our updated guidance reflects the third-quarter sales shortfall and our expectation that these softer demand conditions will persist into the fourth quarter.

As such, the reduction in full-year 2026 revenue guidance compared with our previous guidance reflects both the impacts realized in the third quarter and our updated expectations for the fourth quarter, and is it and is attributable to several factors, including: Approximately $300 million, with $240 million in wholesale and $60 million in retail, reflecting softer than anticipated demand by end consumers, with the demand recovery assumed in the company's previous outlook not materializing as expected, as well as unfavorable product mix, primarily due to lower than anticipated fleece shipments. Approximately $145 million, with $45 million in wholesale and $100 million in retail, reflecting lower than anticipated customer replenishment as customers manage working capital levels.

Approximately $75 million reflecting product availability and service constraints associated with evolving demand and order patterns, primarily in retail. Approximately $30 million reflecting lower than anticipated net selling prices across customers and channels.

Now given the current macroeconomic environment and the update to our full-year 2026 guidance, we believe it is prudent to withdraw our previously communicated objectives for the 2026 to 2028 period, initially provided in our August 13th, 2025 news release and outlined in our Q4 earnings release issued on February 26th, 2026. As Glenn mentioned, the underlying strength and long-term prospects of the business remain strong, and we expect to provide an updated long-term outlook at our Investor Day, which we intend to hold in the spring of 2027.

These assumptions underpinning our updated outlook are detailed in our press release issued earlier today. Notably, our outlook includes approximately $220 million in expected AYEPA tariff refunds, of which approximately $202 million was received in the first nine months of 2026.

It also assumes that a significant portion of tariff refunds, equivalent to the non-recurring refund benefit recorded in 2026, will be reinvested into further strategic growth initiatives in 2026, including investments in brand building, retail marketing programs, and accelerating product innovation and packaging enhancements. Our outlook assumes that the softer consumer demand experienced since the reporting of our second-quarter results persists in the fourth quarter, with no further meaningfully deterioration in the macroeconomic pricing and inflationary environment, and the absence of a significant shift in labor conditions or the competitive environment.

The adjusted effective income tax rate for 2026 is expected to be approximately 16%. The lower tax rate versus our previous expectation of 18% is the result of earlier than anticipated tax benefits resulting from the integration, and the recognition of tax attributes that were not previously expected to be utilized.

In addition, as Glenn mentioned, we used the proceeds from the sale of HAA to repay outstanding debt, and our board approved a new NCIB to repurchase up to 5% of issued and outstanding common shares. As such, with a renewed NCIB and an expected strong free cash flow, we believe that share repurchases are an appropriate use of capital.

Importantly, our capital allocation discipline has not changed. While our leverage may temporarily exceed our target framework of 1.5 to 2.5 times net debt to trailing 12 months pro forma adjusted EBITDA, we remain focused on maintaining an investment-grade credit rating, and we expect to return to within our net leverage target framework by the end of 2027.

In summary, recognizing that our sales and guidance fell short of expectations, we generated $622 million of free cash flow through the first nine months, and we expect $700 million to $750 million for the full year. Our updated guidance takes a prudent view of the fourth quarter, and we remain focused on maintaining a strong financial position, while returning capital to shareholders through our dividend and our new NCIB.

Thank you, and now, I'll turn it over to Jessy.

Thank you, Luca. This concludes our prepared remarks, and now, we'll begin taking your questions.

Before moving to the Q&A session, I'd like to remind you to limit your questions to two, and we'll circle back for a second round if time permits. Genie, you may begin the Q&A session, please.

Hi, good morning, everyone. I know it's a tough question to answer right now with all the macro uncertainties.

Your revised guidance for this year implied Q4 sales will be down around, I think, 16%. How should we think about the first half of next year, understanding that there will be more macro pressure, but at the same time, you'll be lapping the proactive destocking from a year ago?

Any sort of touchpoints or guidance on that would be great. Thank you.

Hi, Chris. Good morning, and thank you for your question.

A few elements. I think in order to understand the underlying strength of the business, one really has to understand what has taken place in the third quarter, given that our third-quarter net sales came in below our guidance, but also below last year.

I do want to make sure I give you an informed view of the third quarter, explain how those trends have translated to the fourth quarter, and then touch upon some of the underpinning elements that one can think of as you move forward. At this juncture, we aren't providing guidance for 2027.

Typically, we do so for every fiscal year when we report our Q4 earnings. Let's focus on the third quarter first, and I'll get to your question.

When you take a look at the third quarter, right, the revenue was $1.47 billion. Versus our pro forma, that was down about 8.9%, all right?

There was a delta of about $143 million. You need to look at that through the lens of wholesale and retail.

When you take a look at wholesale, $735 million, that was down 10.8% versus pro forma of 823. The contributing factors, first and foremost, right, the softer demand trends that were experienced amid the macroeconomic environment contributed to that difference, as well as, and very important, is the unfavorable mix, which was driven by lower fleece sales than anticipated, okay?

Third, there was a positive impact on prior-year sales ahead of announced price increases in Q3 of 2025, okay? When you take a look at the wholesale market, you have to take a look also at the market performance itself.

In Q2, the market was down low single digit, but was strong in June, right? What we're seeing now in Q3, and we've projected to Q4, is a market that is down mid-single digit, and our previous guidance was flat to down low single digit.

We had in our estimates previously assumed that the Q2 fleece tightness that we experienced was going to sell in closer to the season. Those sales have not come through.

Historically, fleece has been a very strong category for us, but in the face of the warmer weather that we've experienced, we've seen the category in September alone, the POS was down, as Chuck was mentioning, mid-to-high teens. We've carried that forward, right, in terms of the expectation for the fourth quarter.

When you take a look at the elements in the wholesale market, right, the two elements that contributed really are the softer demand trends and the unfavorable mix which was impacted by fleece, okay? When you look at retail, retail $732 million, right, down 7% versus the pro forma of 787, the contributing factor there year-over-year, right, we had softer demand trends amid the macro environment, that was partially offset by the wrap-around of price, but we did experience availability and service constraints, right, that impacted the quarter.

When you take a look at Q4, you're right, because we've given a view on the full year, Q4 is implied to be down. It'll be down in both wholesale and be down in retail.

The elements are the macro environment, and on the retail side, really the availability and service constraints in Q3, which are at this point largely behind us, and an element that we can tackle. The other element in the full-year guidance which you have to take into consideration, which is important, is amid the softer demand trends in the macro environment I outlined, we are projecting that in the fourth quarter, we will see lower than anticipated customer replenishment as customers manage their working capital.

That's about $145 million. About $45 million of that in wholesale, but primarily it's $100 million in retail, and you have to think about that categorization as effectively customers curtailing their weeks of supply amid the environment.

Once we understand the drawdown in the guidance this year and the performance, you say, "Well, what's the underlying business like, right?" Comfort Colors, American Apparel, Champion, these categories performed well.

From a share perspective, we gained a little bit less share than anticipated, right? The underlying strength of our product portfolio, the innovation that we're putting into our products, our view into 2027 positions the underlying strength of the business well.

It's important to understand the current scenario, and we've taken the cautious approach to the fourth quarter, given what we know, and we've drawn down the guidance accordingly. Can't provide more guidance on 2027, but did want to share the current conditions are understood and the underlying strength is understood to give us a view on going forward.

That's very helpful. Thank you.

My maybe follow question is, when you mention that you do expect to return to your financial leverage framework by the end of 2027, just curious, what are some of the key building blocks that need to happen for that to be achieved?

It's a good question. Chris, I would say that, as a company, and that's evidenced this year so far, right, we've generated $622 million of free cash flow, and we're anticipating 700 to $750 for the year.

In terms of our capital allocation strategy, we really do balance two key elements. One is remaining investment grade from a balance sheet perspective is very important to us, and also important to our stakeholders and our customers.

Our target range of 1.5 to 2.5 times has not changed. We may temporarily operate slightly higher than that range, but we balance that against also good use of capital.

A really good use of capital presently, we believe is, we've renewed our 5% 5% NCIB program, and through that and our dividend returning capital to shareholders. Strong free cash flow and our balance sheet strength really underpins our view of returning to framework by the end of '27.

Thank you, and all the best.

Thank you, Chris.

Great, thank you so much. Glenn, I want to just ask you about your three-year outlook.

Obviously we're not getting any three-year outlook today, but given this change in the environment, and the opportunity to rethink the guide or to change the guide, what are you going to rethink about the strategy? What might you do different?

What can you do to drive sales growth, do you need to reinvest more? Can you just talk to us about what this is going to cause you to do based on this being the change in the environment over the last few months?

Thank you. Look, we're disappointed, obviously, with the market, but I would say to you that has not changed our positioning.

The consumer is basically under pressure. We think that will turn itself out.

Obviously higher interest rates, higher oil costs, higher food costs, etc. Those are things that are not in our control.

What's in our control is really the things that we've been able to do in building a strong brand portfolio, leveraging our low-cost manufacturing, and we believe that we're well positioned to execute on really innovating and reinvigorating the Hanes portfolio of brands. We have a lot of momentum, I would say, it's hard to sort of comprehend that based on where we are today.

We've have a great reception from our retail partners, basically, in terms of the things that we're doing in the innovation side, the packaging, the advertising, and we believe that it's going to benefit us as we move into the next three years. That's why we, obviously, from where we are today from a revenue perspective, we had no choice but to relook at the revenue number.

We still think and we're very positive that the company is in a very good position. Other than the consumer and the things that we don't control, the things we do control is I think we did a great job on the integration.

We've got our $100 million of synergies. We have very good line of sight of the $100 million that we're going to capture for 2027.

We feel comfortable on the $250 million, and we think that obviously there is more room for upside, which will continue to communicate as we go forward. Look, we've done a great job on the integration so far.

The heavy lifting is behind us. We closed down all of Hanes' textile production.

We consolidated our sock factory into their sock factory in El Salvador, creating probably one of the world's largest sock factories by machines that are actually fully running. We completed the full order-to-cash in the process of that integration and basically consolidated the distribution centers amongst socks.

We've done a lot of consolidation in the sewing network between Central America and Asia. We optimized distribution capacities and reduced facilities this year.

Look, we're focused on 2027 for the complete, full integration from all of our systems, order-to-cash for the balance of the product. We're working light speed in terms of the integration.

Combining that, we've completely reinvigorated every single one of Hanes' products that they're producing. That's why we were so excited originally about our Investor Day, but we're pushing that off a little bit because we just want to make sure that when we re-communicate obviously our long-term visions that we're well prepared.

Look, we're getting the integration behind us. We have good visibility.

Look, we're disappointed with the market, the consumer obviously, the position we're in, and we're really disappointed in letting down our shareholders obviously from what we guided to. When you look at the positive sides of the integration, we're still generating positive EPS growth year-over-year.

Our cash flow is still good, 700 to $750 million. We executed on the HAA sale that we committed to.

We're bringing our debt down within our range basically by the end of the year, after a major acquisition. We're on road to leverage all these synergies that we've outlined.

There are moving pieces, but I would say to you that the business is not broken. We're very, very comfortable with our positioning.

Look, we're still looking very forward to re-issuing longer-term guidance and meeting with our shareholders and explaining to them exactly where we are and the opportunities ahead of us.

I would say, Jay, just as mentioned earlier, right, we intend to hold that Investor Day in the spring of 2027. As I had mentioned on one of my previous remarks, really the strength of our balance sheet is something that we are very focused on, and in terms of our deleveraging story, really coming back within our framework by the end of 2027 is what we're focused on.

Got it. Maybe, Luca, if I could just follow up on that.

Given the softer demand conditions you talked about, the possibility that that lasts into next year is some of the effects, they don't lap it until you get into the back half of next year. Is the change in the long-term guide sort of signal that, look, there's just going to be a lower base effect given what's gone on this year?

Or is it that you no longer really see the growth potential? Whatever the base is this year going forward, after you adjust for the consumer environment, do you still see growth potential, or can you just maybe frame is this change about not being able to do the growth, or is it just having to really adjust the base and wanting to sort of reset that?

Jay, it's the former, right? You have to readjust the base, right?

As Glenn was articulating, right, the prudent thing to do is withdraw the previously communicated guidance because of where we are today. It's the base, and as we move forward, the fundamentals of the business are there.

Maybe one aspect to think of is, when you take a look at our margin profile, right, for the year, we've guided to an operating margin of 20%, right? The previous guidance was 21.8%.

Effectively, within the guide of 20% now, you still have the consideration of the $100 million of synergies, right? You're impacted by SG&A deleverage, right?

The shift in the top line has made its way through the numbers, which effectively governs the change in guidance on the adjusted earnings perspective. It is a new base, and that is effectively the catalyst for withdrawing the previously communicated three-year guide.

Got it. Thank you so much.

Hi, thanks for taking my questions. Glenn, Gildan has been taking up prices in wholesale for its apparel for several years now.

My understanding, after speaking with some of your customers, is that this is creating pressure in sales, and you've seen this pressure persist for years and it gets more acute in some quarters, and you're calling macro, which is understandable. Can you just comment on this?

This taking up prices is in contrast to Gildan's long-term history of taking prices down, which has driven growth in this industry. Now this industry has been stagnant for years, and you're commenting on the macro and it persisting, this weakness persisting.

Wanted to get your perspective on if this is the right thing for Gildan to do, and if in the future, we should anticipate Gildan to revert back to its old strategy of taking down prices, or are there more price increases expected?

That's a tale of two stories, I think, I would say. Look, the number-one fastest-growing product in our line today is Comfort Colors.

Comfort Colors has growing at 20-plus percent a year, let's say, for example, and that shirt's selling for $5. We sell a basic shirt still relatively priced.

I know that prices have gone up, but our basic shirts are still wholesaling at the $2.30 to $2.50 range, basically. They're still very, very attractive in today's environment.

Also, one of the big drivers of our growth over the last probably four years has been fleece. We significantly has grown our fleece business, and fleece is a $10 item.

That's really what has impacted us this year is because where we had seen growth year over year over year, and that business has really declined beginning or in the third quarter and what we're anticipating for the balance of this year. That affects not just, obviously, the top line, but also the mix as well.

I don't think that price is really a factor, because where you see the market growing, I think these are all higher-priced garments. Our Pro is growing, our Champion is growing.

I think it's really what's affecting the demand in the industry is really the consumer spending. Inflation is hurting.

You go to a rock concert, you can't afford the ticket, you don't buy the T-shirt because it's a last resort. There's things like that I would say that are affecting demand in the industry.

What we need to see is we need to see inflation obviously come down. Inflation is a factor.

When you look at price, just to sort of maybe look at that from a different angle, inflation is still very relevant as we move forward where we are today. Now that may change in the next couple months, but cotton, polyester prices, dyes, chemical, energy, transportation, labor, are all going up.

Interest rates as well. If anything, I would say that there's probably room for more price increases for people to be able to, not just us, but the whole world, to absorb these higher costs.

Freight costs from Asia have been going up by $1,000 every tranche, basically. They're back up to close to COVID levels when you look at the price of diesel.

Even though oil was trading at $100 a barrel, diesel is trading in the equivalent of $200 a barrel. There are underlying inflationary factors that I think will continue to pull up price unless there's a reversal of oil and underlying interest rates as we go forward.

Thank you for that. Given that some of your customers in the wholesale channel are private-equity owned, and the industry's weakening, and we're already seeing them destock, how long do you anticipate this destocking in the wholesale channel to persist?

Do you think this is kind of a two-quarter thing, or should we just expect it to continue through the course of the year until we anniversary?

Look at, when you look at the inventory that we called out, the $145 million, $45 million of that was wholesale and 100 of it was retail. Our retailers, not just one, across the board are bringing down their weeks of coverage, basically, of products they have on their floor.

In wholesale, we're calling out a reduction of inventory in the fourth quarter of about $45 million, but that's in line with the negative POS. I think that that's the point they're keeping up their weeks of supply.

Unfortunately, when the POS goes down, you're only keeping inventory on weeks of supply, you bring down those weeks of supply in conjunction, and that's what really is a reflect. It's not on that one customer you mentioned.

That's somewhat across the board of our distributor. It's more of a reduction in inventory in the channel, but more related around POS phenomenon than it is a reduction.

We feel comfortable with the inventory in the channel where we're going to end up at the end of 2020 at the end of 2026. It will be a function of really the growth.

If revenues growth, inventories go up, and if revenue goes down in unit volume, that inventory will dissipate. It's a function of where it is, but we're pretty much balanced, I would say, at the end of '26.

Thank you.

Thanks very much. Maybe, Glenn, can I follow up on that question?

Back in 2019, Gildan ran into a similar backdrop of a strong Q2, change in macro, need to revise guidance. My question is, do you view today's release as comparable in that the rapid change in macro, or is there anything you may view as structural with the recent industry M&A?

Then back then, you also said that prior cycles typically take two to three quarters to revert back to normal. Would you still hold by that?

I would say that, look at, I think in 2019, we fell off against a big cotton bubble basically that sort of translated into demand destruction, and we reset, I think, and tried to energize our business and take market share by passing through that higher-cost cotton sooner than we needed to in order to take market share, which was very successful and put us on a trajectory of long-term growth as we went forward. It's hard to say.

I would say today, things are a little bit different because the market is like what Chuck said, is in a K-shape basically where the lower-end consumer is really feeling the pinch. That's a function of higher interest rates, higher gas prices, food prices.

Those things are really affecting the low-end consumer. I would say we need to see really to get back on a trajectory, the question is that are we at a bottom of the market?

I don't know. To get back on, I think, a growth trajectory, we need to see inflation subside as we go forward.

We know we have a lot of inflation, which I just mentioned. We probably are going to be in a position that prices need to be even move up in 2027 from where we're at today.

It's hard to say exactly where the market would be and where that consumer will be as we go forward. One thing I would leave you with is that we feel very good about our innovation pipeline and the opportunity to continue growing market share in retail.

That's again, a lot of things that we did this year in terms of the Hanes integration, we're not feeling effects of them. That's just the reality of the situation, because in retail, the time from resetting the floor, and all of these new packaging and products will flow through in 2027 and really give us the ability to, I think, continue to take share, and we're well positioned supported by our brand advertising and all the things we're doing.

There's moving pieces, and hopefully we'll see the market bring some stability as we move into 2027.

Then thank you. My follow-up, Chuck, could you please just detail within the wholesale, what segments were most impacted?

Was it corporate spend? Was it tourism?

Were there other products other than fleece that you called out? That would be helpful.

Thank you, Brian. I think we saw it across the channel really, overall.

The biggest impact was what you just mentioned was fleece, and Glenn mentioned it well. If you look back over the last three to four years, fleece was growing at 10% plus a year.

It's been a continuing growing category. It's become a big part of our business.

The biggest impact for us was really the change in fleece. Again, I think it has a lot to do with the warm weather.

You had record temperatures in parts of the US and in Europe that, even warm still through October. It just gave us a really slow start to fleece, and it just has an oversized impact because of the sales price per unit compared to the other business.

I think the softness overall and seeing the channel down mid-single versus where, as Luca said, where we thought it would be was impacted by fleece, and then outside of fleece was spread across all categories.

Good luck. Thank you.

Thank you, Brian.

Hi, good morning. I'm trying to understand a little bit your target market now with the two combined companies.

You're citing weakness in low-income consumer. I know this is not an easy question to answer, but what is your exposure to the lower-income consumer right now?

I don't know if you can talk about it per channel, what proportion you think the low-income consumer represents of your total sales?

Look at, obviously, we have two different businesses, catering ultimately to different consumers. Overall, I would say that the bulk of the innerwear revenues are coming from mass market customers.

Obviously the mass market customers is more oriented to servicing the low-end consumer. I think that put that in perspective, and one of the, I guess the things that we just need to evaluate is when that consumer will come back.

Alan Greenspan once came out and said the way he measures a recession is monitoring men's POS. Men's when it goes negative, technically the United States was going to a recession.

This K-shaped situation we have is obviously POS not performing, and yet the higher-end affluent consumer, obviously, investing in the stock market is doing really well. We're really I think in a unique position because bulk of our products are going to mass, particularly in retail.

In wholesale, I think we're more of a discretionary type of event. You go to a rock concert, you can afford a ticket, you still go to the show, do you not buy your T-shirt, you go buy pizza, you go to pizza shop, do you not buy a T-shirt.

These are obviously discretionary items that people can afford not to purchase. That's one of the reasons why I think we've seen a cyclical decline on a year-over-year basis from worse than we anticipated, from the low to the mid-single digits.

I think what you're seeing on top of that is as you see Comfort Colors doing well, American Apparel, Alstyle, the premium products, as Glenn mentioned in his comments earlier, doing quite well. That shows some of the diversification within that channel, a wholesale channel, as well.

That's helpful. Maybe just I would assume at retail with mass retailers, the planogram discussions are happening now or have happened already for the reset in the spring.

Love to hear a little bit how these discussions have gone, what shelf space look like for you guys next year versus this year?

Martin, we're constantly in conversations with the retailers, as you mentioned. Now we don't have exact floor sets for next year.

What I'll tell you is reiterate something Glenn said earlier: as we show them our new innovation and new product, there was a lot of excitement, because what we're doing, we're really raising that product quality, everything in men's bottoms, for example, the waistbands changed, the fabrics changed. Then, not only do we do that, we put it in better packaging.

Then across the line, we put in packaging that makes it shoppable from our base core all the way to our trade-up, where it's more shoppable, better merchandised. Then on top of that, if you throw in the media campaigns and what we've done on the brand campaigns so far in Q3, and what we're going to do in Q4, hopefully you've gotten to see some of our commercials that have been on Thursday Night Football, been on different programs.

We're really amplifying the brand conversation right now, and then what we're going to follow that with as we go into 2027 is really product-specific messaging around our innovation. Then because once you amplify the brand, you come behind that with product messages.

As we've shown that to the retailers, that creates excitement to them, because it drives traffic to their store. That's what they're after is, can they drive additional ring and traffic in their store.

What I can tell you, I don't have space numbers yet for 2027, but I can tell you the conversations are going well, and the retailers are definitely excited about what we're doing with our products and our brands.

Okay. Thank you for all the color, and best of luck.

Thank you. Good morning.

I wonder if you could share performance by month on a POS basis through Q3 and also for October?

Hi, John. We wouldn't provide that information, right, in terms of a monthly breakdown and POS by category.

What we can say is, look, we were surprised obviously with the rapidity of the impact within the third quarter. We were impacted by softer demand trends amid the macro environment.

As we did mention, going into September, which is really the beginning of the fleece season, the most notable was really the fleece category where POS was down mid-to-high teens, right? That comparative to fleece growing year-over-year for the past few years was a differential, which was fueled really by the weather and other factors.

We don't provide that amount of detail, but that was a category that was clearly indicative. Chuck, you want to add anything there?

What I would say, John, is that if you go back and listen to our last call, we mentioned that we had seen in wholesale, for example, we saw a good June, and then we saw softening in July. What I'll just call you to is then it decelerated further, more than expected, in August and September.

That kind of gives you the trend of the quarter. Similarly, we had said in retail last quarter that we had saw the start of Q3 a little softer, and then deceleration.

That gives you a little bit of color. Then what I would tell you about October is we're trending as we've expected in our new guidance.

I would tell you we're similar trend, and we're in trend with what the guidance we've given.

Okay. Thanks for that.

More broadly, I wonder why you think your industry is disproportionately impacted by the low-income consumer. Is it as simple as it's a discretionary category?

Because there's many retailers and brands out there that have significant exposure to low income, but the organic sales declines are maybe not as material as what Gildan's facing and seemingly what the industry is facing. I wonder how you think about the industry, why it's disproportionately impacted, particularly as many of us consider Gildan a share winner from trade down.

Thank you.

Sure, and specifically when you're talking about it from a retail perspective, I think when you think about the economy overall, you see that the $150,000-plus consumer is doing pretty well, because they're not as impacted by the fuel prices and food prices and so forth. When you look at the consumer that's 100,000 and under, they're having to make some tough choices right now.

They're having to decide, can I afford my gas to get to work and take the kids to school, what can I spend on food. Now, do I think the underwear recovers and innerwear recovers?

Yes, I do. I think it's a category that it's replenishable.

People are going to want and need. When they're making a tough decision at a point in time, can they put off that replenishment of their innerwear for a few more quarters or a month or whatever it is, that's a decision they make so that they can fuel their car and provide food.

I think that's the way we see it and the way we're hearing in the market. Again, I think it will come back, but it's a tough decision people are making right now at a lower income level.

Understood. Thank you very much.

Thank you. Good morning.

You have Nevin on for Steve today. I was just hoping you can expand upon the product availability and service constraints you're facing in retail.

Was this related to a few large customers, or would you view it as broader based? Then do you expect the full impact to be isolated to 2026?

Sure. Thank you.

Again, I think if you look at the availability constraints, they were across categories, it wasn't specific retailer, specific category. I'll give you a little more color on that.

They had several factors. One, we had the fact that we were impacted by shift cadence and kind of mix, and you could see things like lower pack sizes, things that our forecast came in a little bit different from what we'd forecast and planned for, you had a little bit of that.

We had some minor production tightness as we went through some integration of the facilities that Glenn went through, but that went well. We just had some tightness through that.

Then one of the bigger impacts, I would say, is the longer-than-expected lead times on certain sourced products and freight and transit times out of Asia that's really been impacted by the Middle East conflict and what we're seeing move around there. One of the drivers there, as you think about our wholesale business, before we had back orders, we just fill them once we get the goods in.

The retailers, we get an order in, if you can't fill it, it cancels. It's a larger impact when you think about from a retail perspective.

Now, one of the things, we have a plan and a clear set of actions underway to address this, and that's what we want to assure you. One of those is looking at, for example, Hanes historically had lower inventory targets on some of these longer lead time items, and we're actually going to slightly increase those so that we can carry a little more supply onshore, invest a little working capital to make sure that we can service that retail demand and have product available.

We've implemented that, we're in the process of building that up. What I would tell you is, and I think we put in our release, for the most part, these inventory constraints are behind us.

I would say they're largely behind us, and we shouldn't see that impact as we go into 2027.

Great, that's helpful. Thanks.

Then just lastly, Luca, are you able to unpack your margin guide for 2026? Relative to the prior expectations, would you view the pressures more coming from gross margin or SG&A?

Then any goalposts that you're able to provide as we head into 2027?

Thank you for your question. When we take a look at the gross margin and the SG&A, and really the operating margin, right, let's start with the third quarter.

The operating margin in the third quarter was 27%, which was ahead of guidance of 26. Two main factors there: 200 basis points approximately because of the timing of our reinvestments that were planned between the third and the fourth quarter, and then offset by about 100 basis points of SG&A deleverage, right?

Still a strong margin within the quarter. When you take a look at the full year, we're guiding to an adjusted operating margin of approximately 20%.

That considers the $100 million of synergies, and as I mentioned, the previous guidance was 21.8%. Obviously, with the call down in terms of the top line, it's impacted by SG&A deleverage.

If you take a look at what really underpins our margin as we move forward, right, in gross margin, let's not forget this year, we had lower year-over-year fiber costs, right? We had the synergy realizations.

We had tariff refunds net of some reinvestments that went through the gross margin. We're managing inflationary puts and takes, right?

We do have good visibility at this juncture given our vertical integration and the way that our costs flow through inventory and cost of sales. We've mentioned on previous calls, our advantage in terms of our network and operating in Bangladesh, our network optimization in Central America, and the investments that we made in our yarn optimization have borne fruit.

The underlying gross margin is strong. With respect to SG&A, when you take a look at our SG&A percentage, synergy realization is coming through.

We have line of sight on the next $100 million for 2027 that's going into our operating margin as well. We had some elements this year, such as the Barbados subsidy that has come through.

We do have lower variable compensation this year, but we also had some one-time integration costs in our SG&A that will not recur. When you take a look at the 20%, it was really impacted by SG&A deleverage.

As we move forward, we will see those synergies continue to come through, and the underlying strength of the margin is there for the business.

Understood. Thanks for taking the questions.

Thank you.

Thank you. Once again, thank you for joining us today, and we look forward to speaking with you soon.

Have a great day.