Good morning, and welcome to our first-quarter results. I'm joined by our CFO, MAP, and our Head of IR, Peregrine Rivière.

Q1 was a record quarter for the group and a perfect example of the value of our model. Our leading multi-asset class trading venues have been critical sources of liquidity, price discovery, and risk management, while customer engagement with our trusted data to inform their decision-making has reached new highs.

This is reflected in revenue growth of almost 10%, the highest since the acquisition of Refinitiv 5 years ago. This strong start puts us in an excellent position to deliver on our financial targets for the year.

As you will have seen from this morning's announcement, we expect revenue growth to be in the upper half of the 6.5% to 7.5% guidance range. We continue to take an agile approach to capital allocation.

In the first quarter, we used the dislocation in our share price to buy back £1.1 billion of shares. Including dividends, we expect to return more than £3 billion over the next 12 months.

Q1 was also a quarter of strong strategic progress. We're continuing to innovate and invest to capitalize on the opportunities that the ongoing technological change across our industry is creating.

Our LSEG Everywhere strategy is embedding our AI-ready data across financial services, driving further growth in March and April in the number of customers accessing our data via MCP servers. We're also transforming our own products with very strong feedback on the Workspace AI tools we introduced in Q1 and an exciting pipeline of additional enhancements this quarter.

The group's innovation goes far beyond AI. We executed the first transaction on our private securities market in Q1, expanding private market funding through our public markets infrastructure.

We're making excellent progress on post-trade solutions in partnership with 11 global banks. We're building digital markets capabilities, including a digital settling house and a digital securities depository, and forging a new distribution channel for financial models through our Model as a Service offering.

I'll say more in a moment about our strong commercial and strategic progress, but first, I'll hand over to MAP to give color on the record financial performance.

Thanks, David. Overall, as David said, it was a very good quarter and further proof of our all-weather model.

It was a strong quarter for our subscription businesses; all of them accelerated in Q1. Data & Analytics was up 5.1%, as the strong gross sales at the end of last year flow through to higher revenues.

We saw particular strength in Data & Feeds, up 7.3%. The contribution from pricing and retention in D&A was unchanged compared to last year.

FTSE Russell was up almost 9%. Subscription revenues accelerated as the rate of contract renewals normalized, as we said it would.

Growth in asset-based revenue was also strong, reflecting product inflows and higher market levels. Risk Intelligence grew double digits, 10.5%, reflecting strong demand for our business-critical screening and identity verification services.

Together, those businesses grew 6.3%, a strong acceleration from the 5.2% last quarter and on track for our expectation of around 6.5% growth for the full year. The quality of our market infrastructure really stands out in the kind of market environment we saw in Q1.

David will give you more detail on this in just a moment, but you can see the financial impact on that on this slide. Markets revenue were up 15.5%, driven by strong performance across all the businesses.

Cost of sales benefited from the action we took last year on the SwapClear revenue surplus. As a result, gross profit was even stronger than total income, up 11.5% in Q1.

Clearly, we have had a very strong start to the year. The outstanding performance from Markets, combined with the great visibility we enjoy in our subscription businesses, sets us very well to deliver on all guidance for 2026.

In particular for revenue, we are confident in reaching the upper half of our guidance. In addition to our ongoing investment in the business, we are also returning surplus capital.

We repurchased shares worth £1.1 billion in the first quarter. Just over £400 million of this was from buybacks announced last year, and nearly £700 million was from the latest buyback announcement in February.

Combining the rest of this year's £3 billion buyback and dividends, we will be returning nearly 10% of our market capitalization to shareholders over a 15-month period. As a reminder, even with our high level of investment and large shareholder distribution, we expect to end the year around the middle of our leverage range.

This is all from me, and I will pass back to David.

Thanks, MAP. Customers increasingly want to use our data in AI applications, opening up a new distribution channel.

We're embracing that through our LSEG Everywhere strategy, delivering AI-ready data to our customers in their preferred environment, embedding our data in their AI-powered solutions and agents. We're continuing to see strong uptake on MCP distribution.

In the roughly 4 months since launch, we now have 90 customers who have connected to our MCP server directly or via one of our AI partners, and we have a pipeline of over 60 more customers looking to connect. This is great progress, given the onboarding process can take a few weeks.

You can see from the pie charts that we are seeing a good global spread, as well as broad-based interest across buy-side, sell-side, and corporate customers. We're seeing roughly half connect through Claude, with the rest split between direct connections and other third parties.

In terms of data sets, we are adding new ones to MCP all the time. Just this week, that included estimates, company fundamentals, and corporate actions.

Overall, we now have over half of our non-real-time data available via MCP. The platform is becoming more attractive every day.

Over the coming weeks, we will add transcripts, Lipper funds, FTSE Russell indices, and much more. While we are currently focused on driving adoption, we're refining our commercial policies and will share the framework at our H1 results.

Strong progress on our AI-ready data. We are also making great strides embedding AI into Workspace.

Our Workspace AI search product is in pilot with around 1,500 users today, and we expect to launch general availability in the next few months. Our Workspace AI deep research capability answers complex prompts with leading models from Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google using our trusted data.

We have around 1,600 customers in pilot, and deep research is benchmarking very well against competitor products. We're adding much more data over the coming months and rolling it out more extensively throughout 2026.

Today, over half of the take-up is coming from the investment management sector, where we have traditionally had lower penetration. A positive sign.

We're also seeing really deep engagement with our products. When global uncertainty and market volatility rise, as they did in Q1, our customers turn to us, testament to their trust in our solutions.

We saw record use of Workspace in Q1. Our oil tools, which have long been popular with users, saw a 75% sustained uptick in usage.

Our shipping data experienced a threefold increase in demand. In Data & Feeds, our real-time business data traffic grew 33% in Q1.

This has continued into Q2 with a new all-time high in early April. We're also really scaling up in some of the new channels we have added in recent years, making it easier for customers to access our data.

Following the enhancements we made in 2023, we have accelerated growth in our cloud-based real-time offering, Real-Time Optimized, and use of that platform rose fourfold in Q1. I've spoken before about the power of the Analytics API we built in partnership with Microsoft.

In Q1, we drove 44% growth in data consumption through that channel. Making tick history more easily available via cloud-based solutions continues to drive strong demand, with 39% growth in the use of that data in Q1.

Turning to our Markets businesses, as we have intentionally positioned ourselves in areas of strong structural growth, driving the electronification of fixed income trading with Tradeweb, supporting cross-border flows in FX, and helping customers manage risk and optimize their capital in our post-trade businesses. We achieved exceptional volumes in interest rate swaps on both our trading and clearing platforms, as customers adjusted to shifting market expectations in Q1.

Market conditions also drove strong volumes across the rest of the fixed income franchise, as well as FX. That was on top of the strong double-digit growth we have consistently been delivering in FX clearing.

In equities, we also achieved strong trading volumes. Technology is accelerating the pace of change in our industry.

We are investing and innovating to take advantage of that. Our index business, FTSE Russell, is expanding its presence in the digital assets space, attracting 8 digital asset ETFs to track its benchmarks in Q1.

We're also seeing good demand for our private markets indices with StepStone. As markets digitize, we're on track to deliver 2 new digital markets capabilities: digital settling house and digital securities depository in Q2 and H2, respectively.

I'll pick out just one more example from this slide: Model as a Service. We made financial models from Société Générale available through this channel in Q1, the first time we have expanded our Analytics API to third-party models.

We're adding models from our post-trade business later this quarter, taking further advantage of the powerful distribution capability of the Analytics API we built with Microsoft. To wrap up, this has been a record quarter of growth that puts us in a strong position to deliver on all our targets for the year.

We're driving adoption of our AI-ready data across the industry through a range of AI partnerships. Our innovation is creating powerful new platforms for long-term growth.

We are returning significant surplus capital to shareholders: £1.1 billion in Q1 and more than £3 billion over the next 12 months. We're very excited about the opportunities ahead of us this year and beyond, and are very well positioned for continued growth.

With that, I'll pass to Peregrine for Q&A.

Thank you, David. Could I ask you please to restrict yourself to 1 question?

If we have time, you can join the queue again and ask a further question. Thanks.

Operator, over to you.

Oh, good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my question.

I think you've mentioned that you'll be looking to share more on the commercialization of MCP as a distribution channel at 1H. I just wondered if you could give us a sense of your early conversations with larger customers, appreciating we're only about 4 months since launch.

Is there a recognition on their part that this ultimately won't be included in existing agreements, will be and so you charges there? Just I noticed that you said that you're seeing larger buy-side adoption in this channel versus the business broadly.

Why do you think that is? Thank you.

Morning, Tom. We are definitely seeing understanding and recognition from our customers that this is incremental, this is a new product, it's a new service.

It has been specifically laid out in our, for example, our data access agreements. A big part of those discussions, those negotiations are around the existing perimeter of what we provide.

I think it's very clear to them that MCP and the AI distribution channels are outside of that perimeter. Actually, a lot of the discussions that we are having with our customers are around their eagerness both to access the product and, frankly, to understand what the commercial model will be.

We are in early discussions with a half dozen or so about the commercial framework. As we mentioned, we will be sharing that framework with the market in our half-year results.

On the buy side, I think it's just the utility. I think our customers are finding it very helpful, attractive product, easy to use.

We're not particularly surprised that we're seeing that kind of traction.

Thanks, David.

Thanks.

Thanks, guys. Appreciate the presentation.

A question on the MCP server. Apologies, going to be focusing on this a little bit.

I guess can you give us a little bit more color as to the economics of the MCP server? If we think about you setting it up in the investment, how should we think about ultimately the variable costs?

Is this something where there's a lot of operating leverage or there's a significant amount of consumption-based costs tied to the usage of the server? Thank you.

Hey, Mike. It's MAP speaking.

In terms of economics, as far as MCP is concerned, two a couple of points that I can make. As our clients are using LLM models to access MCP, being OpenAI, Claude, or Gemini, it's our clients who are paying the tokens to the LLMs.

This cost is with our clients. Then the cost we have for MCP is mostly coming from two things: first, the cloud cost; and the cost of the data platform.

Both of these costs are indeed variable. That's something we want to take into consideration while we are establishing the commercial policy for this new product.

Thank you, very helpful.

Hi, good morning. I've got one question on D&A growth.

It was 5.1% in the quarter, and only up marginally from the 4.9% in Q4. Can you talk about the different dynamics within the division where it seems like Data & Feeds had decent growth, but Workflows slowed marginally?

Also, I guess you touched upon it in terms of the enhancements in the Workspace. Would this be helpful in terms of driving up further growth within Workflows in terms of pricing or greater demand in the future?

Thank you.

Sure. Good morning, Hubert.

I would not overinterpret any modest tick up or tick down in terms of Workflows, in particular. We continue to see really strong interest in the new functionality of Workspace and interest as well in terms of the new functionality that is Open Directory, and how that will continue to be expanding over the course of this year and beyond.

We'll continue to add capabilities, add functionality, add product in there, new private markets data in there as well, which is also getting some good interest. I wouldn't get, as I said, I wouldn't overinterpret any kind of modest ticks up or ticks down in terms of where Workflows are.

Then Data & Feeds, business doing very well. We touched on this in the presentation, but very high demand for the content that we're providing in Data & Feeds as well as Workspace.

We will continue, as to invest in that platform and look forward to continued growth there. Great.

Thanks. Maybe just the last point I should emphasize—I think everyone knows this, but just to be clear, no MCP revenue in here.

Thanks. Good to know.

Thank you.

Yep.

Yeah. Good morning.

Just continuing a bit on the MCP theme. I'm just wondering, out of the 150 clients that have signed up or are signing up, how many are new clients to you?

Are there any substantial new logo wins of size? Just wondering how this is driving incremental growth in the business.

Thank you.

Hi, Arnaud. I cannot give you that answer off the top of my head.

What I can tell you is that it's a broad range. We're seeing some large institutions like the big global banks, we're seeing smaller institutions like hedge funds.

One dynamic that I can share with you is that the onboarding process can be much quicker with some of the smaller institutions. They're really eager just to get on.

There's not a lot of focus or review on some of the compliance or regulatory aspects, whereas with the larger institutions, the onboarding process can take, I'll say, a few to several weeks. There can be a couple meetings where we explain the content, we explain how it works, go through a number of the security issues, then there can be some legal discussions, and then there's the actual onboarding.

Just in terms of timing, that's probably the area where I can at this point, I can give you the most insight. The bigger institutions tend to be slower than some of the smaller, more nimble institutions.

I hope that helps.

Hi. Thank you for taking my question.

I just wanted to follow up on your very latest comment, David, on the for example, on the fact that it's faster to onboard a smaller institution. On one hand, I would think, on top of my head, that it would be easier to generally onboard clients via MCP relative to what has been historically.

AI is a very powerful technology, and I think that there might be some concerns and risks in terms of the perimeter of the usage of data, what the AI actually may end up using. My question is, do you expect that as this type of connectivity increases as a proportion of your, let's say, total clients and total revenues, the sales cycle will actually expand or will it actually shrink over time?

Thanks.

Enrico, when you say the same cycle, I just want to make sure.

Sales cycle.

Oh, the sales cycle, got it.

Basically, if it's going to take you think over time, over the next, let's say, 3 years, is it going to take longer actually to onboard clients or actually it's going to be faster, you'd be able to do it quickly? I'm just concerned about the implications of AI for risk, for securities, making sure that the perimeter is well-defined.

I know there's a lot of legal implications when contracts are signed that involve AI technology.

I would expect it well, first point I should make, it's already quicker relative to the historical onboarding in terms of what I'll call traditional or conventional products, if we were setting someone up for a traditional API. It's already quicker than that.

I would expect over time that it accelerates as our customers get more accustomed to the technology, as there is more and better understanding, particularly as we put our commercial framework out there later this year. This is all very new.

Just to remind everyone, we turned this on, I think, December 23rd. We're just a few months into this, both in terms of having our own data sets available in this manner, and in terms of our customers really figuring out how to to use it.

A number of them have been in what I describe as an exploration mode here. As the comfort level increases, and I'm sure that on our end we'll look to facilitate and accelerate our own processes as well, I would expect to see the sales cycle actually becoming a little bit shorter.

Very helpful. Thank you.

Yep. Thanks.

Good morning, and thanks for the presentation and taking my question. I have one on the subscription growth, wondering about the sustainability of it.

It ended quarter at 6.3%, which I think is quite healthy. I think you also indicated that this is partly attributed to normalization in FTSE Russell mandate renewals.

I was just wondering how much is from one-time boost, as the former they have seen in Q1, versus a structural step-up in underlying run rate, please.

Yeah. Just to reframe the conversation, we posted indeed 6.3% for the subscription business in Q1.

We have reconfirmed our guidance of 6.5% for the entire year, which would mean that in the next three quarters we will be between 6.5% and 6.6%. In order to do so, we have a growth which is broad-based, both in D&A, FTSE, and in Risk Intelligence.

I have already indicated that we expect Risk Intelligence to carry on being double-digit. As far as FTSE Russell is concerned, you're right on the fact that we, after a 2025 which was a bit difficult, we see FTSE Russell going back on a growth trajectory to the high single digit that we used to have, and an acceleration in progressive acceleration in D&A.

That the three elements that is conducting to 6.5% for the year. As I was saying, we are very confident in it.

Thank you.

Good morning. My question is also on MCP.

Presumably, there are also some customers that have elected not to take it up at this stage. I just wondered what the typical pushbacks you're hearing when this is the case.

Is it that customers aren't ready, or that customers are using other MCP providers or any other reasons? Are there any actions you're planning to take to address any of these points to push connectivity up through the year?

Thanks, Ben. We're not seeing a lot of pushback.

I think to the extent that we have had any questions, it's really been about the availability of certain data sets. We've shared it with some customers, and they have been looking for particular specific data sets.

Sometimes if those data sets are not yet on, they're a little bit less interested. As we mentioned this morning, we're adding more data sets all the time.

We're now over 50% of all of our non-real-time data sets available through MCP, and that continues That's just making it more and more attractive.

Great. Thank you.

Hi there. Morning, thanks for the presentation.

Oliver Carruthers from Goldman Sachs. I've got another MCP question, which follows on a little bit to your answer to the last one, David.

It seems like some of your data and analytics competitors are also making their data sets available via to the clients via MCP servers, but they're only making their data sets partially available. Could you talk a little bit about your philosophy of how you're going to set the perimeter for what data sets you make available for your clients via MCP, and then, particularly in the context of your LSEG Everywhere strategy, which to me feels quite differentiated in this context?

Thank you.

We are, as I think you all are aware, we're very comfortable making our data available through MCP, and we are adding more and more of our data sets to it. We think it is a very helpful and valuable distribution tool.

We think it works very well in terms of, I'll call it, cross-selling. It's a much stronger cross-selling machine than any human could be.

We have about 1,500 data sets, and so if you are submitting a query through your model that goes into our MCP server, the way that works is that it is looking across the data sets that it has access to to respond to that query. It is a very powerful, natural cross-selling machine.

It's also a great lead generation machine, because to the extent that we have data available in our MCP server and a customer does not have the license to that data set, then we can structure it so that that becomes lead generation for us, and then we can interact with that customer, let them know that there is data available that would be responsive to their queries, and expand their licensing. I understand some of our competitors have more of a closed box mentality to this kind of opportunity set.

That's not our approach. From what we hear from a lot of our users and customers, they prefer our open model in this, I'll say, in this new era of very powerful AI distribution channels.

I may just add David, we are adding data sets on a fortnight basis. Actually, we added yesterday Reuters News and macroeconomic.

Now we have Reuters News, we have fundamentals, estimate, peers, end-of-day pricing, corporate action, ESG, ownership, company info, officer and directors, macroeconomic that we just put yesterday night. In front of us in 2026, as mentioned in the slide, the major one that are awaited by our clients is deal and ownership data, and transcript and filing.

Then we will add commodities and the Lipper fund data, and finally FTSE Russell. You see, it's a very busy pipeline of data set onboarding that we have in front of us.

Thanks a lot. Very helpful color.

Hi there, thanks for taking my question. I'm also on MCP, if that's okay.

Maybe can you just elaborate a little bit more around the strategy with respect to MCP? I see that you've kind of led with sort of real-time, pricing data, tick history, while others have led with maybe more sort of company fundamentals, transcripts, kind of research content.

Is there any strategic reason that you sort of see it differently to peers in terms of prioritization, or is it a case of adding what is readily available more or less as quickly as possible? Can you just elaborate for us what's the end state here, and when will we reach that?

Do you anticipate having more or less everything available via MCP in the medium term, and when is the medium term, effectively? Thank you.

Thanks, Ian. Just I guess I'd say a slight correction.

We do not make our real-time data available through MCP because of the latency requirements of real-time. That is Could you do it technically?

You could do it. It's just, given the current construct and the customer demand, that's not practical.

It's really just a function of making the data sets available, in part relative to what we see in terms of customer demand, and in part making sure that the data sets are structured in a way so that they can be interoperable. This is actually an important point that people often don't get.

If you put a bunch of different data sets in an MCP server sort of willy-nilly, and they're not structured in a way to be interoperable, that can confuse a model. In the same way that if you have a model accessing different data sets from different MCP servers that are not designed to be interoperable, that can confuse the model.

We are making sure that we're providing our data sets into our MCP server in a manner such that they are all designed, architected to be interoperable, so that the a model that is accessing data or content through our MCP server is going to get very consistent a very consistent experience with the interoperability amongst the different data sets, which just leads to better performance, higher accuracy in the model. That's an important point that sometimes gets lost in terms of understanding how this works.

In terms of end state, I expect that we'll have the vast majority of our D&A data available this half. Then, as MAP mentioned, there's more coming in terms of FTSE Russell and other data from broader parts of LSEG over the second half.

We see really significant opportunity there in terms of creating an MCP channel to access the vast amount of data that we have across LSEG.

No, I would just add it's really about what David said. It's we are The reason why we are able to put new data sets on a fortnight on MCP is because these data sets have been rearchitected by our team through our partnership with Microsoft.

It's all the work that we have been doing at rearchitecting the data with Microsoft, which is now coming to fruition and which is allowing us to be so fast at getting the data sets ready for MCP. As David said, by summer we'll be done for all non-real-time data sets.

Got it. Thanks for those points.

Hi, thanks for taking the question. I'll take one outside of MCP, if that's all right.

There's been growing debate about your FXall business, could you just talk us through the sort of planned investment within that business, where do you think you need to step up functionality, what's going to change over the next year or two, and what the synergies are with the rest of your business? Thanks.

FXall has had a very strong performance, as you would have seen in Q1. We have been continuing to invest in the capabilities in FXall, really over the past couple years, and continuing to improve in its functionality, in its speed, in the interface.

I would say probably the area to touch on for this year is the fuller integration from FXall into Workspace and the opportunities that that brings with this integrated front-end system. We've got FXall also plugged in as of a year or two ago into Tradeweb.

We have straight-through FXall execution capabilities into ForexClear, the kind of end-to-end processing. Again, strong performance this year, continued investment and continued improvement in its functionality, and we think it's a great business.

Right. Thanks very much.

Thank you.

yeah. Thanks for the follow-up.

Just in your prepared remarks, you talked a bit broadly about the momentum you were having in post-trade services. I'm just wondering if there are any specific milestone you want to flag here in terms of activity pipeline.

Thank you.

Arnaud, just want to make sure I heard you right. The momentum in post-trade services, is that what you were asking about?

Specifically the partnership with the banks.

Yes, got it. Yeah.

It's going well. We're seeing we in Q1, we put TradeAgent out there, which is very efficient, helpful platform in terms of OTC processing.

We are seeing significant onboarding of new customers. The real area of focus now that we have the banks fully involved as of the announcement in Q3 of their investment, there's now active, ongoing discussion across the business of really creating more integrated functionality.

When we talked about this business last year, you would have heard us talking about Quantile and Acadia and the different SwapAgent and different parts of it coming together. Now it's becoming much more of an integrated offering, and there's good engagement and dialogue with the banks as partners in terms of where we're taking this business.

Good progress and good onboarding. It's at this point, has good growth.

It's not a huge contributor to the business yet, but we expect, as you have seen us deliver on in other parts of our business, we expect a nice, long runway of growth.

Thank you.

All right. Sorry, just one follow-up to clarify, as I think that there's been a bit of confusion around it.

Can you just please, for clarity, confirm that the derivative hedging, the FX impact that you experience in this quarter, that was about, I think, 5 billion 5 million positive, is not included in the reported constant currency growth rate, just for the tape to be clear?

Yes, sure. No, I confirm that the embedded derivative impact of 5 million is not recorded in the organic growth.

Thanks.

Great. Thank you, all.

Thanks for your questions. To the extent you have any further questions, you certainly know where to find us.

Peregrine and the team would be happy to hear from you. Wish you all the best.

Thanks a lot.