Mettler-Toledo International, Inc.

Mettler-Toledo International, Inc.

1,490.00
EUR
-16.00
(-1.06%)
38.90EPS
28.49P/E
22.26BMarket Cap
Nov 05Next Earn

Q4 FY2025 · Earnings Call TranscriptFebruary 6, 2026

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. My name is Jericho, and I'll be your conference operator today.

At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Mettler-Toledo Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise.

After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press * followed by the number 1 on your telephone keypad.

If you would like to withdraw your question, again, press the *1. I would now like to turn the conference over to Adam Uhlman, Head of Investor Relations.

You may begin.

Adam Uhlman

Hey, thanks, Jericho, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us.

On the call with me today is Patrick Kaltenbach, our Chief Executive Officer, and Shawn Vadala, our Chief Financial Officer. Let me cover some administrative matters.

This call is being webcast and is available for replay on our website at mt.com. A copy of the press release and the presentation that we will refer to on today's call is also available on our website.

This call will include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 and the U.S.

Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements involve risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, financial condition, performance, and achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements.

For a discussion of these risks and uncertainties, see our recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and quarterly and current reports filed with the SEC. The company disclaims any obligation or undertaking to provide any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement, except as required by law.

On today's call, we will use non-GAAP financial measures, and a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure is provided in the 8-K and is available on our website. Let me now turn the call over to Patrick.

Patrick Kaltenbach

Thank you, Adam, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining our call today.

Last night, we reported our fourth quarter financial results, the details of which are outlined for you on page 3 of our presentation. We had a great finish to the year with broad-based growth by geography and product category.

Our team continues to execute very well in a challenging environment and delivered strong adjusted EPS growth for the quarter with excellent free cash flow conversion for the year. I am very proud of our organization's resilience and agility over the past year as we successfully navigated challenges posed by global trade disputes and soft market conditions, and we remain agile in this dynamic environment.

Looking ahead, we are very well-positioned to drive growth through our Spinnaker sales and marketing program and innovative product portfolio, while capitalizing on opportunities related to automation, digitalization, and onshoring investments around the world. Our strategic initiatives and strong culture of innovation and operational excellence are deeply embedded in the organization and will help us continue to gain share and deliver strong financial performance.

Let me now turn the call over to Shawn to cover the financial results and our guidance, and then I will come back with some additional commentary on the business and our outlook. Shawn?

Shawn Vadala

Thanks, Patrick, and good morning, everyone. Sales in the quarter were $1.1 billion, which represented an increase in local currency of 5% or 4% excluding previously communicated acquisitions.

On a U.S. dollar reported basis, sales increased 8%.

On slide number 4, we show sales growth by region. Local currency sales increased 7% in the Americas, which included a 3% benefit from acquisitions, and increased 4% in Europe and 4% in Asia/Rest of the World.

Local currency sales in China increased 3% during the quarter. Slide number 5 shows local currency sales growth by region for the full year 2025.

On slide number 6, we summarize local currency sales growth by product area. For the quarter, laboratory sales increased 3%, while industrial increased 7% and included a 3% benefit from recent acquisitions.

Excluding acquisitions, core industrial grew 2% and product inspection grew 7%. Food retail grew 19% in the quarter.

Lastly, service revenue grew 8% in the quarter, including a 2% benefit from acquisitions. Slide number 7 summarizes our local currency sales growth by product area for the full year 2025.

Let me now move to the rest of the P&L, which is summarized on slide number 8. Gross margin was 59.8% in the quarter, a decrease of 140 basis points, and included unfavorable foreign currency of 70 basis points and acquisition mix.

Our organic gross margin declined 20 basis points excluding foreign currency and was impacted by incremental gross tariff costs of 190 basis points. R&D amounted to $52.6 million in the quarter and was flat on a local currency basis over the prior period.

SG&A amounted to $259.8 million, a 6% increase in local currency over the prior year, and includes sales and marketing investments. Adjusted operating profit amounted to $363 million in the quarter, up 3% versus the prior year.

Adjusted operating margin was 32.1%, a decrease of 160 basis points versus the prior year. Unfavorable currency was a 100 basis point headwind to operating margin in the quarter.

We estimate the gross impact of tariffs reduced our operating profit by 7% and was a 190 basis point headwind to our operating margin. A couple final comments on the P&L.

Amortization amounted to $19.7 million in the quarter, interest expense was $17.4 million, and adjusted operating income amounted to $4.1 million. Our effective tax rate was 19% in the quarter.

This rate is before discrete items and is adjusted for the timing of stock option exercises. This also excludes a $19.5 million discrete tax benefit related to the settlement of a tax audit.

Fully diluted shares amounted to 20.4 million, which is approximately a 3% decline from the prior year. Adjusted EPS for the quarter was $13.36, an 8% increase over the prior year.

Incremental tariff costs were a gross headwind to EPS of 7%. On a reported basis in the quarter, EPS was $13.98 as compared to $11.96 in the prior year.

Reported EPS in the quarter included 28 cents of purchased intangible amortization, 18 cents of restructuring costs, a 14 cent net benefit from acquisition-related items, a 1 cent tax headwind related to the timing of stock option exercises, and a 95 cent discrete tax benefit. Slide number 9 summarizes our full-year 2025 results.

Local currency sales increased 3% for the year, adjusted operating profit declined 1%, and our operating margin detracted 140 basis points. Adjusted EPS increased 4%.

Excluding the impact of 2023 shipping delays that benefited 2024 results, we estimate local currency sales grew 4% in 2025, operating margin declined 80 basis points, and adjusted EPS grew 8%. Unfavorable foreign currency negatively impacted our operating margin by 50 basis points in 2025.

Gross incremental tariff costs was a headwind to operating profit by $50 million, operating margin by 130 basis points, and EPS growth by 5% in 2025. That covers the P&L, and let me now comment on adjusted free cash flow, which amounted to $878 million in 2025, a conversion ratio of 99% of our adjusted net income.

DSO was 35 days, while ITO was 4.2 times. Let me now turn to our guidance for the first quarter and the full year 2026.

As you review our guidance, please keep in mind the following factors. First, our guidance assumes U.S.

import tariffs as well as the impact of retaliatory tariffs from other countries will remain in effect at current levels. Second, while we acknowledge that headlines from some end markets like life sciences have been more favorable recently, geopolitical tensions remain elevated, and we assume customers are more cautious with their investments to start the year with gradual improvements throughout the year.

However, on a full-year basis, our forecast does not assume a significant improvement in market conditions in 2026 versus last year. Third, we feel very confident in our ability to execute on our growth and productivity initiatives and believe we are well-positioned to gain market share regardless of the macro environment.

Now turning to our guidance. For the full year 2026, our local currency sales growth forecast is unchanged at approximately 4% or approximately 3.5% excluding our previously announced acquisitions.

Our operating margin is expected to be up 60 to 70 basis points excluding the impact of currency, which is flattish to up slightly on a reported basis. Adjusted EPS is forecast to be in the range of $46.05 to $46.70, which represents a growth rate of 8% to 9%.

At recent spot rates, foreign exchange is estimated to be a 1% benefit to sales growth and a slight headwind to EPS. For the first quarter of 2026, we expect local currency sales to grow approximately 3%.

Operating margin is expected to decrease approximately 100 basis points at the midpoint of our range, or flat excluding unfavorable currency. We expect adjusted EPS to be in the range of $8.60 to $8.75, a growth rate of 5% to 7%.

Currency for the quarter at recent spot rates would benefit first quarter sales by approximately 4% and would be neutral to adjusted EPS. Some further comments on our 2026 guidance.

We expect total amortization, including purchased intangible amortization, to be approximately $78 million. Purchased intangible amortization is excluded from adjusted EPS and is estimated at $27 million on a pretax basis, or approximately $1.04.

Interest expense is forecast at $70 million for the year. Other income is estimated at approximately $19 million, which is up from our previous guidance and is due to updated pension accounting that is partly offset by higher pension costs that are included in operating profit.

We expect our tax rate before discrete items will remain at 19% in 2026. Free cash flow is expected to be approximately $900 million in 2026, which is an increase of 5% on a per-share basis, with the first quarter approximately $100 million, which is impacted by the timing of tax payments.

Share repurchases are expected to be in the range of $825 to $875 million. That's it from my side, and I'll now turn it back to Patrick.

Patrick Kaltenbach

Thanks, Shawn. Let me start with some comments on our operating businesses, starting with Lab, which had modest growth in the quarter against strong growth in the prior year and good underlying organic sales growth for the full year.

Our results reflect robust bioprocessing growth, especially with single-use consumables, which was offset in part by softer demand from biotech, academia, and the chemical sector. While headlines for pharma and life sciences markets have been more favorable recently, we expect customers to still be cautious with their investments to start the year.

Our unique go-to-market strategies will ensure that we are very well-positioned to capitalize on our customers' growing needs for equipment replacement going forward. Our innovative portfolio remains an important competitive advantage, and we continue to invest to further differentiate ourselves from the competition.

For example, we recently launched an entirely new electronic pipette called the Avero that is lightweight and has a very compact design. It has an exceptionally long battery life and can complete 2,800 pipetting cycles on a single charge.

It is also unique in that it allows scientists to adjust flow rates, which is very helpful when working with delicate cells or nucleic acids, for example. Our Avero introduction complements the many exciting lab innovations we've brought to market in recent years, and we have a deep pipeline for the future.

Turning to Industrial, we had modest growth in our core industrial business this quarter, including strong growth in China against easy comparisons. Given the soft market conditions over the past year, we are pleased with the good sales growth core industrial delivered in 2025.

However, market demand in most geographies remains subdued, and we have maintained our full-year forecast for modest growth. Our teams remain active in identifying new growth opportunities, and we believe we are well-positioned to capitalize on investments in automation, digitalization, replacement demand, and onshoring in the future.

Our industrial portfolio is in excellent shape, and to support growing demand for automation applications, we recently introduced new high-speed data communication features and protocols across our smart automation weighing indicators that ensure the compatibility of our devices with our customers' IT and OT ecosystems. We have partnered with leading MES providers to enable seamless integration of our intelligent weighing devices through standardized interfaces into factory automation systems.

Our solutions assure GMP-compliant batch records and enable intuitive operator applications, helping customers increase efficiency and reduce errors as IT and OT environments continue to converge. Turning to Product Inspection, sales growth in the fourth quarter was very strong as we have capitalized on our excellent portfolio, and we believe our organic sales growth in 2025 was well ahead of market growth.

We continue to enhance our portfolio and recently introduced our new X3 series of X-ray solutions for end-of-line inspections of loose products like prescription tablets and pills, or food items like nuts, fruits, and grains. The X3 series offers both single- and dual-energy capabilities and is very differentiated in the market.

Lastly, Food Retail sales grew strongly against easy year-ago comparisons. While our food retail business tends to be lumpy, we were very happy with its growth in 2025.

Now let me make some additional comments by geography, starting in the Americas, which had good growth across most of the portfolio, especially with our industrial and retail solutions. Growth in our laboratory business was good and included very strong bioprocessing growth.

Turning to Europe, our fourth quarter results were better than expected due to very strong performance from our Product Inspection business. For the year, our European market organizations delivered good results despite soft economic conditions in some Western European countries as we continue to benefit from our Spinnaker sales and marketing initiatives and innovative portfolio.

However, economic conditions in Europe are mixed, and we do not expect significant improvement in market demand in 2026. Finally, Asia/Rest of the World had good growth in the fourth quarter and was largely in line with our expectations.

Our business in China grew 3%, led by good demand for industrial products from biopharma customers. Lab products were flattish, and our team remains very engaged with helping customers to help them address new China Pharmacopoeia regulations, including stricter minimum weighing standards and quality monitoring of ultra-pure water, among others.

Market conditions in China have recently been more steady, but as we know from the past, things can change quickly. In markets outside of China, we had very good growth against difficult comparisons in the fourth quarter.

Emerging markets outside of China were 18% of our sales in 2025 and grew above our company average due to our dedicated resources and growth initiatives in these countries. Emerging markets are an important component of our growth strategy, and we expect above-average sales growth over the coming years.

In summary, we delivered another year of solid growth despite ongoing market headwinds as our team leveraged our sophisticated go-to-market strategies and strong product and service offering. Our team's resilience and agility in our pricing, supply chain, productivity, and cost-saving initiatives were pivotal in navigating tariff challenges and government policy uncertainties throughout 2025.

We are squarely focused on driving growth in 2026. We will continue to benefit from our strong global leadership positions, diversified customer base, innovative product offering, and significant installed base.

Service and faster-growing emerging markets will remain tailwinds, and we have accelerated our digital capabilities to identify and pursue growth opportunities, increasing the effectiveness of our global sales organization. Our market-leading solutions and innovative portfolio uniquely positions us to meet increasing customer demand for automation and digitalization solutions, as well as faster-growing segments.

We also look forward to capitalizing on future growth opportunities with customer replacement cycles and investments in on- and nearshoring activities over the coming years. Now this concludes our prepared remarks.

Operator, I'd like to open the line now for questions.

Operator

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session.

If you have dialed in and would like to ask a question, please press *1 on your telephone keypad to raise your hand and join the queue. If you would like to withdraw your question, simply press *1 again.

If you are called upon to ask a question and are listening via speakerphone on your device, please pick up your handset to ensure that your phone is not on mute when asking your question. We do request for today's session that you please limit to one question and one follow-up.

Our first question comes from Patrick Donnelly from Citi. Please go ahead.

Patrick Donnelly

Hey guys, thank you for taking the questions. Maybe on the 1Q commentary, Patrick, you talked about baking in that customers, in spite of some positive headlines to your point on pharma and life sci, customers, you're baking in a little more cautious to start the year.

Is that something you're hearing through the first month and change here, or is it just, obviously, there's the typical Mettler conservatism? Just wondering if that's something you're picking up in the market, or more just, hey, we don't want to bake in any improvement just yet, let's see how it plays out.

It would be helpful to just talk through that 1Q guide.

Patrick Kaltenbach

Hey, thanks, Patrick. I'll let Shawn comment on this as well, but maybe to my comment on the headlines, again, headlines have been still pretty volatile, and while they have been better on the pharma and life sciences sides, we all appreciate there's still more uncertainty in the market out there.

This also, across the broader portfolio and the broader markets we serve, still leads to longer deal cycles, et cetera. We, as we said also through in our Q3 call and also at the J.P.

Morgan conference, we think our customers and we feel that will start the year a bit more cautious, and we have really built that into our guidance for Q1 and for the full

Shawn Vadala

year. Hey, just to echo what Patrick said, hey, of course, stepping back, we're of course very pleased with the fourth quarter, came in better than what we expected, some good broad-based growth throughout the portfolio.

We can kind of dig into that maybe in a minute. We're also very pleased with our full-year guide carrying forward that beat into 2026 full year, maintaining the 4%—not organic, the local currency guide for the full year on sales.

Like Patrick said, as we previously mentioned, we do kind of tend to think that customers will likely start the year a little bit more cautious in Q1. It's always difficult to have visibility into Q1, every time you're starting a year, it's a new year.

You almost have to get through the whole quarter and get through March to really get a feeling for how things are progressing. Just sitting here today, it feels like a prudent approach for us to take in terms of how we're looking at the first quarter.

As he says, we do expect things to kind of gradually get better throughout the year.

Patrick Donnelly

That's helpful. Then Shawn, maybe one for you, just in terms of components of the guide.

Would love if you could break out how you're thinking about pricing versus volume, both on the revenue side, and then if you could give a bit of a margin build with pricing, FX, et cetera, would be very helpful. Thank you, guys.

Shawn Vadala

Hey, we continue to feel really good about our pricing program. Of course, one of the things that I like about pricing the most is that it really highlights the value proposition in the company.

We've been really investing a lot in innovation over the last few years, and when you create value, you can realize pricing. If you kind of look at our pricing, we're going to start the year off a little bit stronger because of the benefit of midyear pricing actions from last year, I'm kind of would expect Q1 to be in the 3.5% or so kind of a range.

Then for the full year, we're kind of maintaining that 2.5% for the full year. From an acquisition perspective, we would expect a benefit of about 1% during the first half of the year from acquisitions, which would be about a half a point for the full year.

Then that would kind of translate into organic volume for the full year of 1%, but it would be down by about 1.5% for Q1. This kind of just gets back to that same comment about just being a little bit more cautious.

Frankly, just not surprised if customers start the year a little bit more cautious with how they spend, just given the volatility that they experienced last year, and just some of the uncertainty in the market. Hey, we also recognize headlines have been getting better, and hopefully, we'll start to see things that translate into business as we go through the year.

In terms of margins, there's a few things in terms of affecting our margins. Maybe we'll start with operating margin.

On a reported basis, well, maybe one comment first. Currency has a pretty significant effect on our margins.

It did in the second half of the year, if you remember, we're talking about this last quarter. It's not a significant effect on profit, but it is on sales.

Just the math, when you start calculating operating profit as a percentage of sales, of course, that's going to have and optically look like a headwind. That headwind is about 100 basis points for the first quarter, and it's about 50 basis points for the full year of 2026.

Excluding that, we would expect our operating margin to be up slightly in Q1, and we would expect it to be up by about 60 to 70 basis points for the full year. Then, of course, on a reported basis, it's going to be different.

On a reported basis, Q1 will be down, probably in the 100 basis point kind of range, maybe 90 basis points. Then for the full year, it would be up slightly.

Operator

Our next question comes from Vijay Kumar from Evercore ISI. Please go ahead.

Vijay Kumar

Hey, guys. Congrats on a nice print, and thank you for taking my question.

Just back on this Q1 guidance, Shawn and Patrick. You guys did 4% organic in Q4.

I think your Q1 is implying 2% organic, correct me if I'm wrong. What causes that 4% to 2% step-down?

What are you assuming for end markets? When you say cautiousness, can you walk us through the different assumptions you're having, industrial versus lab and pharma?

Shawn Vadala

Sure. Hey, maybe I can walk through maybe, VJ, kind of the assumptions for Q1, full year, but also Q4.

As I kind of do it, you'll see that, when we look at the beat, there was a very good beat on the industrial side, especially product inspection. Then when you look at the geographies, you'll see Europe came in better than expected, also to a certain degree in the Americas.

As we were kind of entering the quarter, we were a little bit more concerned about Europe, but our product inspection business in Europe did particularly well. Then when we go through it, you'll also see that kind of what steps down a little bit from Q4 to Q1 just in terms of growth rates.

You'll see a little bit on the industrial side, you'll also see a little bit on the retail side, and also maybe this cautiousness in the Americas as well as to a certain degree in Europe. In terms of the fourth quarter, I think this might be out there, but I'll just kind run through it quickly.

Q4, lab grew 3%. Our guide for Q1 is up low single digit, and our guide for the full year is growing low to mid-single digit.

Core industrial grew 4%, and our guide for Q1 is flattish, and our guide for the full year is up low to mid-single digit. Product inspection grew 11% in Q4, of course, that was 7% organic.

Then the industrial, by the way, was 2% organic, core industrial. Then our Q1 guidance for product inspection is up mid to high single digit, and our full-year guidance is up low to mid-single digit.

Then retail grew 19% in Q4, and our guidance for Q1 is up high single digit, and then our guidance for the full year is flattish. Then if we kind of look at the regions, Americas was up 7%, which was 4% organic.

If you look at Q1, we're guiding up low single digit, and we're guiding for the full year up mid-single digit. Then Europe was up 4% in Q4, and then for Q1, we're guiding up low single digit, and then for the full year also low single digit.

Then China was up 3% in Q4, and then for Q1, we're guiding also up low single digit, and for the full year up low single digit.

Vijay Kumar

Hey, that's very helpful, Shawn. Just on your EPS raise composition.

In my math, looks like maybe half the beat came from below-the-line trade between interest expense and higher pension income. What's the other, I guess, 30 cents or so raise coming from?

Looks like top line didn't change.

Shawn Vadala

You're talking the full year 2026, VJ?

Vijay Kumar

Yes.

Shawn Vadala

No. I think just to clarify, the beat in Q4 was related to sales.

I think some of the below-OP stuff might be a little confusing, but we excluded some of those benefits from our adjusted EPS, for example, the one-time tax benefit. When you look at our 2026 EPS guidance, we kind of carried forward the EPS beat from 2025.

We also increased our EPS for the benefit from Swiss tariff rates. You might remember the Swiss tariff rate decreased from 39% to 15%.

That had a benefit of just under 1% of EPS. Then, aside from that, there was a little bit of noise.

We had foreign currency, which was a slight headwind, and we updated for that. Then we had a little bit of noise with better pension income that's going to help out a little bit below OP, but that's also based on how you do your actuarial accounting at the end of the year, but there's also maybe an offset in some of the pension stuff above OP and just some basic fine-tuning at the end of the year.

Stepping back, we're very pleased with raising EPS by $0.70 for the full year, which is about 2%, and maintaining our 8% to 9% EPS growth.

Vijay Kumar

Helpful. Thanks, Shawn.

Shawn Vadala

Yep.

Operator

Our next question comes from Dan Arias from Stifel. Please go ahead.

Dan Arias

Good morning, guys. Thanks for the questions.

Shawn, food retail is pretty strong here. Is something picking up, or is that just sort of the inherent lumpiness of that business?

The outlook, I think, for the year is flat, I'm not sure if spending improvement makes that easier, or if the big 4Q just kind of creates a tougher comp, which makes that harder to reach.

Patrick Kaltenbach

Hey Dan, this is Patrick. Look, with retail, of course, we are very happy with the performance we have seen for retail in Q4 and also in 2025 as it was growing.

I also want to remind you that the retail business is a pretty lumpy business, a lot of project business. As we still guide retail for Q1 for high single digit, I think fiscal year '26 will see tough comp, and with that, we also guide it to flattish growth in 2026.

Again, it's a lot of ups and downs, big project business there. We compete really well, we actually spend quite some amount of innovation and brought a lot of new products over the last two years, and that we compete extremely well.

Again, it's more lumpy, and as proud as we are for 2025 growth, we see the full fiscal year '26, given the tougher comps, rather flat.

Dan Arias

Okay. Then maybe on China, I know no one thing changes the growth picture for you guys, but how would you characterize the pharmacopoeia opportunity over there that you talked about a little bit last quarter just in terms of what might be tangible when it comes to demand and then when you think that purchasing might ramp up if, in fact, it does?

Patrick Kaltenbach

That's a good question, Dan. Look, in China, again, we are really well-positioned with our team there.

We have an outstanding portfolio, and pharmacopoeia is one of the opportunities where we have seen some really good customer engagement also in Q3 and Q4 of last year. We expect this to continue, but it's not like a step change, right?

This is continued upgrade of existing balances in of customers' labs as they want to comply with things like minimum weight requirements, et cetera. I think it's supporting our ongoing growth in China in the lab business in 2026, but it's not a huge step change that comes all at once.

Dan Arias

Yep, makes sense. Thank you.

Operator

Our next question comes from Michael Ryskin from Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Michael Ryskin

Great. Thanks for taking the question, and congrats on the quarter, you guys.

First, I want to touch on, you've talked about the onshoring opportunity a number of times in the past, and you've cited it again today. Just curious if you could give us an update on that, any change in conversations or in tone.

I know it's still really early, but just sort of what your sense is on timing on when you might start seeing at least the beginning of these orders, late '26 or still more of a '27, '28 dynamic?

Patrick Kaltenbach

Thanks, Mike. Look, yes, there's a lot of good news I would say out there, but think about our product portfolio, a significant part of our portfolio, over 50% of our portfolio is actually for manufacturing, and then you have another 25 or 20% to 25% also for QA/QC.

If you think about this reshoring, onshoring, especially for pharma, these factories still have to be built, right, and then come into play with our portfolio as they build it out. We see this more as a 2027 and beyond opportunity for us.

Of course, it's important that we are out there in discussion with our existing customers. We help our existing customers a lot with our portfolio, make sure that they are well aware as they plan then of building out potential additional facilities in U.S.

to make sure that we are their preferred supplier for these opportunities. It's pharma, but it's also other areas, if you think about, for example, the battery segment and others.

Around the world there are, I would say, in the coming years a lot of good opportunities when it comes to reshoring, where customers build redundant setups to make sure that they also de-risk the setup that they had in the past. I see this for the, I'd say, coming years as a good opportunity, but we have not factored it in as a big growth opportunity for 2026.

I think it's still very early innings.

Michael Ryskin

Okay. That's helpful.

Then, I want to touch a little bit on Europe. Feels like that's been doing a little bit better than expected.

I think Dan hinted at a little bit more for us the last couple quarters despite tough comps. Just talk about what you see driving that on the ground there and how sustainable that is going forward.

Thanks.

Shawn Vadala

Hey Mike, maybe I'll take that one. As I kind of was alluding to before, kind of coming into the quarter, we were a little bit more cautious on Europe.

We've been extremely proud of our European organization over the years. If you just look at the economy in Europe, it's the softer economy in the world in more recent times.

With PMIs kind of in the low 40s at times, and we've continued to, I think, do extremely well with that kind of a backdrop. Think a lot of it, we benefit from, of course, a strong organization, but also, our Spinnaker program really allowed, with the combination of us going most direct in Europe, I think allows us to also be a little bit more precise in terms of that ability to gain a little bit of market share each year.

If we just kind of look at the fourth quarter, though, one thing that I mentioned before that really stood out was our product inspection business. We just had really strong growth in that business, and I think it's a theme we've seen in other regions throughout the year, which is some of the innovation that we've introduced to the market in recently has been just very well received.

A lot of that innovation is really trying to go more specifically at the mid-market segment, and we're doing quite well there. Otherwise, I'd say we're competing well in the other product categories in general, but, with a, I'd say, a more challenging backdrop in some of the other regions.

Operator

Our next question comes from Catherine Schulte from Baird. Please go ahead.

Catherine Schulte

Hey guys, thanks for the questions. Maybe just on service.

I think you said up 8% in the quarter, 6% organic. What's the outlook for that side of the business in '26, both including and excluding acquisitions?

Shawn Vadala

Yeah. Do you want me to take it?

Yeah. You're you're correct, Catherine.

We we grew 8%—I'm just like looking at my notes to make sure I got it right—we grew 8% in the quarter, 6% organic. As we kind of think of about next year, we're thinking about about mid to high single-digit growth overall for the business for the first quarter and the full year, and and, when you look at the the first quarter, there's some acquisition growth in that, Q1 would be more mid-single digit.

I think the full year probably still rounds to to mid to high single digit. As we've talked about in the past, we just continue to see service as a great opportunity.

The team kind of recently celebrated the fact that they achieved $1 billion in sales for the first time, and and it's so that was a nice milestone. It's a business that we've been really focusing on in terms of trying to penetrate.

If the I think you're familiar, like if you look at the serviceable IB that we have available to us as an opportunity, it's about $3 billion, so we've we've penetrated about 1/3, and we we continue to see opportunities to go after that. As we do that, we, we have been putting additional resources into that business, and we continue to be, optimistic kind of going forward for the medium to long term here.

Catherine Schulte

Great. Then for China, another quarter of modest growth there in the fourth quarter.

Sounds like maybe some easy comps in core industrial and lab about flat. Can you just unpack a bit more what you're seeing in that market and the outlook for lab versus industrial in the low-single guide for the year?

Shawn Vadala

China overall came in as expected. We're pleased with that.

We recognize that industrial had an easier comparison, but we'll still take it. They actually had quite strong growth in the quarter.

When we kind of came out of the budget tour last year kind of we were in China in September, and one of the takeaways for me was you could just feel that there was a lot more positive energy coming out of our industrial team. It's really kind of cool to actually see it translating into results here.

I think they're doing very well there at the moment, and that's good in the context of an economy that still has some challenges. When you kind of cut through and look at the markets, one of the markets that really is doing better there is the pharmaceutical end market.

We see that in both sides of the business. Maybe the one area that is more challenging is on the chemical side.

For us, chemical means mostly specialty chem, but that's a more challenging end market at the moment. When we look forward to China for this year, we're still looking to guide in that low single-digit range for Q1, for the full year.

Right now I'd probably think lab and industrial will probably both be in that kind of a range, maybe some quarters better than others, depending how things play out here a little bit. Big picture, I think we've had at least a year of things have moderated there, we've had some modest growth, I think it's a good base hopefully to now grow on.

We're not building in anything too significant to get over our skis. As we know, things in China can change quickly in either direction, but hopefully we'll start to see things pick up at some point.

I think longer-term, we still feel very optimistic. I think, when you look at the Five-Year Plan and you look at all the investments going into the pharmaceutical industry and life science industry in China, it's very encouraging.

Then you look at some of these trends about GLP-1s and the number of companies in China that are investing in that, it's also a good opportunity just as an example. I think our team is well-positioned for that.

As we have a really great China for China story, with us making most of our products in China for China and selling mostly to Chinese private companies. I think that's just a good setup for us, and we've always performed well there relative to the market.

Catherine Schulte

Great. Thank you.

Operator

Our next question comes from Luke Sergott from Barclays. Please go ahead.

Luke Sergott

Great. Thanks for the question, guys.

I just wanted to kind of touch on more of that pharma side and also the A&G weakness that you talked about. Also, I guess, part of that in 4Q with the biotech weakness as well.

We're starting to see some green shoots in biotech. Pharma's doing a lot more M&A, and I know that it's probably going to track a different cycle than, obviously, the clinical research.

How are you guys thinking about when that funding starts coming back? Where in that cycle would you guys start to see some of the pick-up?

Or if this biotech or the early-stage pharma where you're seeing weakness now is more just associated with kind of the academic funding environment?

Patrick Kaltenbach

Maybe I take that. Luke, we are, I think, quite excited about our biopharma and specifically biopharma processing activities that are going on, and Shawn made a comment here on GLP-1 and others.

I think that's actually where we see good momentum in the market almost around the world, so that's what I would say is a growth driver for us as well. When you mentioned academia and government and biotech, we have actually pretty small exposure in that area.

It's mainly in the area of liquid handling and with our pipette business, et cetera. Otherwise, we are not really prominent in that segment.

It's hard to say when we really would see a pick-up there. Of course, depends on some really good funding should come back into the biotech and academia area.

Again, we would first see that on the pipette business, if that is picking up again. Right now, we saw that business in Q4 still a little bit under pressure.

I think it's slightly declining in Q4, and we have to wait and see, again, when the funding is really coming back and when we see more momentum. I think, we'd say that the indicator there for us would be more on the pipette business.

As a reminder, it's a smaller part of our overall business.

Luke Sergott

Gotcha. Then one for Shawn.

On the GMs, and I understand it's completely fluid tariff environment for you guys, but, more generally, we've kind of seen this kind of tick down in gross margins across the space, and is there a dynamic going on with you guys where your tariff mitigation efforts outside of pricing, those are ongoing and then you're starting to get some pressure here from your suppliers, and there's just going to be a mismatch between timing of when you can pass that on to your customers? Is it just trying to figure out where this kind of ultimately shakes out, or if you guys are just being forced right now to kind of eat it until things normalize?

Shawn Vadala

No, actually, we're doing quite well in terms of managing the input costs. I think the SternDrive program has really been helping us out.

That program has a lot of sophistication, like a lot of our programs, when it comes to digital capabilities and our ability to really look at what should something cost, it's called should-costing, and we can really diagnose opportunities that we can leverage as we look at our cost structure. I think what's making what was already a confusing year with tariffs more confusing is that currencies have changed quite a lot more here in the second half of the year.

I was trying to explain that earlier in the call, but I wouldn't dismiss that, right? It's a 70 basis point headwind to gross margin in Q4, and as I mentioned before, we're going to see that kind of carry forward to the first half of next year.

Then some of these recent acquisitions, while on an OP basis, they're fine, just when you start to look at some mix effects, we start to get a little bit of unfavorable mix in terms of gross margin. It's kind of like the way you think about the service business, right?

It's good when it comes to OP, but in terms of gross margin, it might be a little bit dilutive. That's because a lot of these recent acquisitions were distributors, which were largely service businesses, and then any incremental product sales is going to be smaller, just by the virtue of the fact that they were a distribution partner.

When you kind of cut through all that, like I was trying to say, I don't know if we got into this before or not, but if you cut through FX and you cut through the acquisition side, the organic gross margin was down 20 basis points for the quarter and for the full year, and that's despite a very significant gross headwind on tariffs, right? It was 190 bps in the quarter.

If you think about it, while we were mitigating things throughout the year, we did have this topic of the Swiss tariffs that kicked in at 39%, and then we're having to absorb that during the fourth quarter. The step-down to 15% tariff rate in Swiss tariffs, that benefit will happen more in 2026, not in Q4.

I think there's even maybe a little bit of bleeding into the first part of Q1, just given stuff that was maybe in inventory already. Hope that helps a little bit, yeah.

Luke Sergott

Oh, that does. Thank you.

Shawn Vadala

Yep, thanks.

Operator

Our next question comes from Tycho Peterson from Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Tycho Peterson

Hey, thanks. Wanted to dive in a little more on the industrial strength product inspection.

Shawn, I appreciate your comments that some of this is new product intros and opening up the mid-tier market. Is there any way to kind of delineate how much of this is kind of broader market recovery versus actually opening up new markets?

Then, I know in the past you've talked about replacement cycle here, in particular, the industrial portfolio well-positioned. Is that business benefiting at all from replacement cycle at this point?

Patrick Kaltenbach

I'll take that, Tycho. I think that the growth you're seeing in our product inspection business, we cannot point here to any underlying market recovery or market strength, actually.

We think the market is still under considerable pressure, the food market, but I would say very well-positioned with our portfolio and all the innovations we have pushed across the portfolio, whether it was in X-ray detection and checkweighing, and there's more to come. Again, we had a clear dedicated plan to not only dominate the high end, but also attack the mid-range market, that strategy is playing out really well.

I would say it's mostly innovation, that's the growth that you see there. When it comes to the installed base and replacement market, what we are seeing across the board, across the portfolio, and that is not only true for the product inspection business is, yeah, we see a little bit of aging of installed base.

I think we have now seen probably two years of subdued replacement, and what it needs really for that to pick up is what I mentioned at the beginning is more certainty in the market, more confidence of customers that they can invest. They of course cannot hold off forever, but I think once the market gets a bit more stable and there's more certainty in the market and less noise, we will see a gradual pick-up again in the replacement business to more normal levels, and probably also a bit more, but it will not be, again, a step change.

This will be a gradual phasing-in of the replacement business again.

Tycho Peterson

That's helpful. Then, following up on the pharma onshoring, reshoring comments earlier, I appreciate that's more of a '27 and beyond story.

Fair to assume Lab will see that later, but maybe you'll see it on the Industrial side earlier, weighing and dimensioning for transport, logistics, things like that?

Patrick Kaltenbach

That's a good way to think about it. As for this onshoring and reshoring, of course, also we work with industrial partners, with automation solution providers, et cetera, that use our equipment.

I think they will pick up first as they prepare for the manufacturing solutions there, the automation lines, and everything that is needed, and also our own products for production. Then Lab, including the QA/QC products that we deliver for these markets, will be probably a bit later.

Tycho Peterson

Okay. Then maybe just one last one on bioprocess.

I know it's a smaller part of the business, maybe just touch on what you're seeing there, how do volumes look, and what are you baking in this year?

Shawn Vadala

I'm sorry, Tycho, can you repeat the question?

Tycho Peterson

Just bioprocessing and consumables, single-use. Can you just talk a little bit about volumes and what you're baking in on the bioprocessing side this year?

Shawn Vadala

Hey, we didn't bake in specific guidance for it, but certainly on the bioprocessing side, we had a very strong fourth quarter, especially when, geographically, we look at the Americas, the U.S. bioprocessing did especially well.

Single-use also did particularly well in that market as well, too. We kind of look at that as an above-average growth driver in the Lab business, and certainly feel good about the momentum there kind of carrying in and through 2026.

Operator

Our next question comes from Doug Schenkel from Wolfe Research. Please go ahead.

Douglas Schenkel

Hey guys, thank you for taking the questions. I guess another question on Lab.

I think in Tycho's last question, he got at the bioprocessing component there, but, again, Q4 results came in pretty well ahead of estimates, you grew solid mid-single digits on a really tough comp, and you accelerated on a two-year stack basis. What would you call out as driving the underlying improvement, not just in process analytics and bioprocessing, but more broadly, what's driving underlying improvement?

Did you see any signs of budget flush? Then was there anything that you would call out in terms of just a change in trend in key end markets?

Thank you.

Patrick Kaltenbach

Thank Doug. In terms of the pharma, biopharma market overall, a lot of it is biopharma processing, which is more the process analytics piece.

Then, to your question regarding the budget flush, yeah, we have seen, I would say, some budget flush. It's always hard for us to clearly assess how much is budget flush, but we have seen some better momentum towards the very end of the quarter, which points to budget flush, and that was also affecting the Lab portfolio, we saw some flush coming there as well.

If you think about Lab and where we play and how we play, a lot of it is also linked to our strong software solution that we have there with LabX, which really helps us to connect a broader portfolio of our products in either R&D labs or QA/QC labs. It helps our customers to also automate more workflows, and I think that's kind of the trend that we see overall that helps us to compete very effectively and drives momentum also forward.

That's something where we have really a stronghold, where we invest a lot to not only drive automation in the industrial piece, but also on the Lab side, and I think that's probably one of the things that also helps us to pick up more momentum in the market.

Operator

Our next question comes from Dan Leonard from UBS. Please go ahead.

Dan Leonard

Thank you very much. Hi, Patrick.

Hi, Shawn. I want to revisit, Patrick, the comments you made on your emerging market view.

You commented that you have an expectation for above-market sales growth from emerging markets, and I want to clarify, does that comment include China, or were you speaking to emerging markets outside of China?

Patrick Kaltenbach

A very good question, Dan, and thanks for that question. I think it's an important one.

We really speak about outside of China, we expect for the emerging markets, which we also said is in the meantime make about 18% of our total revenues, versus China is more like 15% or 16% of our total revenues. Above-average growth and above corporate growth rate is specifically pointing towards the emerging markets ex-China.

Dan Leonard

Appreciate that clarification, then. Then what is your updated view on growth in China over the medium term?

Is that fleet-accretive or fleet-neutral?

Shawn Vadala

Hey, we're not necessarily formally updating guidance on China. I think we are very optimistic still about the medium to long term.

We clearly acknowledge that it doesn't need to grow at the rates that it grew in the pre-COVID era. The last time we updated our algorithm for growth, we were kind of looking at high single digits for China, but, sitting here today, would be very comfortable if it was mid-single digit with our ability to still hit our 6% plus long-term sales growth algorithm.

Just as one example, the emerging markets outside of China are now bigger than China, and we kind of see a lot of growth opportunity there. There's also a lot of other things going on inside the company that we feel good about, so.

Operator

Our next question comes from Jack Meehan from Nephron Research. Please go ahead.

Jack Meehan

Thank you. Hi, everyone.

Had a couple questions on core industrial. The first is called out, seeing some signs of life on the PMI side.

I was just curious in that context, can you unpack the first-quarter guide? I think you're assuming flat growth.

Is there some timing dynamics going on or just piece those together for me?

Shawn Vadala

You're right. It's definitely a little bit of a step-down here from what we did in the second half of 2025.

I think as we kind of look at it, out of all of our businesses, it has a little bit more sensitivity to the economy. Some of the recent PMIs, nice to see the direction, certainly there's a lag in terms of when we would see that in our business.

Kind of as a reminder, about 60% of core industrial is sold into a combination of pharma/biopharma, food manufacturing, and chemical. Out of those three sectors, the chemical sector has been under more pressure this year, probably expect it to continue to be under pressure in Q1.

We're just assuming as the typical company starts the year, they're just going to be a little bit more cautious with how they release funds, and we'll see how it plays out. As we only sit on 1.5 months of backlog typically at any point in time, but that's just kind of how we were thinking about it when we guided at last quarter for this year.

We've tried to communicate on that we wouldn't be surprised if things start off a little bit slower this year, and certainly that's how we feel sitting here today, so.

Jack Meehan

Got it. Okay.

Let's say there's a scenario where continue to see positive trends on the PMI front, can you just remind us what the drop-through is? If we did see incremental organic growth, what the flow-through would be on the margin line?

Shawn Vadala

I think on the core industrial side, it's going to be right around corporate average. It depends, of course, what part of the portfolio you're in, but if you're into the part of the portfolio that's really serving the opportunities regarding automation and digitalization, which is the faster-growing sector, that's above corporate average.

Some of the stuff that's a little bit more cyclical tends to be below corporate average.

Operator

Our next question comes from Josh Waldman from Cleveland Research. Please go ahead.

Josh Waldman

Hey, good morning. Thanks for fitting me in.

One for Shawn and then one for Patrick, I think. Shawn, can you talk through how you're thinking about the organic growth progression through the latter three quarters of the year?

I guess, are you factoring in a larger than normal ramp off of the Q1 to get to the full year? Then on the embedded caution to start the year, I guess are you seeing this in the order book when you consider normal kind of order seasonality for a January?

Shawn Vadala

Hey, maybe I'll take the first part of the question first. I think if you look at our ramp-up, it's not a significant ramp.

Yes, we're going to be down a little bit organic volume in Q1 per our guidance, but if you look at the second half of the year, it probably implies something in the 2% kind of a range in terms of organic growth. Now in the second half of the year, we'll have a little bit less pricing and a little bit less acquisition benefit, so that number might not be as high as just simply adding the increment of organic volume.

That's kind of how I would probably see it sitting here today, but certainly wouldn't want to get into specific quarters. I think every year is the same, and this year is no different, and probably even has a little bit less visibility as you start it, just given all the volatility from last year.

We're going to learn a lot more here over the next couple months. I think once we get through the full quarter, we'll have a much better perspective on what Q2 looks like and what the rest of the year looks like.

Then in terms of orders, hey, we never comment on months and in particularly in Q1. January is always a goofy month, right?

February is a goofy month, you have Chinese New Year timings, seasonality-wise, these are our lower months in the year, we'll see. Like I said before, we only sit on about 1.5 months' worth of backlog.

We'll see how it plays out, and we're executing well, we feel really good about how we're positioned. We have, I think, a really good balance of looking at growth opportunities and also keeping an eye on productivity topics, and we'll continue to have that balance going forward.

Josh Waldman

Got it. Okay.

Then Patrick, on service, I think you said the group reached $1 billion in sales. Can you remind us how that's dispersed across Lab and Industrial segments?

Then in the past, I think you've talked about service as an area of strategic investment, and I wondered if you could talk through what you see as the near-term opportunities in service to drive incremental share growth on the hardware side.

Patrick Kaltenbach

Very good. Thanks, Josh.

Look, I'm very excited about services and also the growth rates we have seen over the last years. We made a really conscious decision to overinvest in services as well and drive that opportunity, as Shawn said.

We currently cover about 1/3 of the installed base. There's ample of opportunity for us to continue to cover more of that with strategic programs.

We're making good progress. When you think about the breakdown between Industrial and Lab, for example, it's almost along the revenue line, because in Industrial, you would have to differentiate between, for example, PI, where we have a stronger service business, versus core industrial, where it's a bit less.

I think it almost balances it out across the portfolio in terms of contribution and comparison to the product business. We're very excited about where we stand.

It's a great strategic program for us as a company, and we are, of course, super proud that the team achieved this major milestone of $1 billion of revenues in services.

Josh Waldman

Great. Thank you.

Operator

That concludes the question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the call back over to Adam Uhlman for closing remarks.

Adam Uhlman

Hey, thanks, everybody, for joining us today and for your excellent questions. Please feel free to reach out if you have any follow-ups, and have a great weekend.

Take care. Bye.

Operator

This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.