Good morning, and welcome to the second fiscal quarter 2026 conference call for i3 Verticals. Joining me on this call are Greg Daily, our Chairman and CEO; Rick Stanford, our President; Geoff Smith, our CFO; and Paul Christians, our Chief Revenue Officer.

To the extent any non-GAAP financial measure is discussed in today's call, you will also find a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure by reviewing yesterday's earnings release. It is the company's intent to provide non-GAAP financial information to enhance understanding of its consolidated GAAP financial information.

This non-GAAP financial information should be considered by each individual in addition to, but not instead of, the GAAP financial statements. This conference call may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements, among others, regarding the company's expected financial and operating performance.

For this purpose, any statements made during this call that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. You are hereby cautioned that these forward-looking statements may be affected by important factors, among others, set forth in the company's earnings release and in reports that are filed or furnished to the SEC.

Consequently, actual operations and results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Finally, the information shared on this call is valid as of today's date, and the company undertakes no obligation to update it, except as may be required under applicable law.

I'll now turn the call over to the company's Chairman and CEO, Greg Daily.

Thanks, Clay, and good morning to everyone on the call. We are pleased with our performance in the second quarter as we continue to execute against our strategy and further improve the quality of our business.

Revenue from continuing operations grew 6% year-over-year, and annualized recurring revenue increased 12%, which we continue to believe is the best indicator of our long-term growth opportunity. Across each of our public sector markets, we are investing thoughtfully in products and capabilities where we see opportunities.

For example, we continue to find compelling opportunities to invest in justice tech market to help courts modernize and capitalize on their own revenue opportunities. However, we are seeing opportunities for cost control and margin expansion amongst many of our highly durable products.

Importantly, the process improvements and efficiency initiatives we've been driving through the organization are beginning to show up in our operating model. While we continue to invest for growth, we believe these efforts position us well for margin improvement as we move through the remainder of fiscal year '26.

We remain well positioned from a balance sheet perspective, which gives us the flexibility to pursue all manner of capital allocation opportunities. Overall, we're encouraged by the momentum we're seeing across the business and remain confident in our ability to create long-term value for our shareholders.

With that, I'll turn it over to Geoff to walk through the financial results in more detail.

Thanks, Greg. The following pertains to the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, which is the quarter ended March 31st, 2026.

Please refer to the slide presentation titled Supplemental Information on our website for reference with this discussion. You will see we have retooled our presentation of revenue.

We believe this clarifies our recurring revenue and simplifies the categories investors track, while maintaining visibility in the important trends in the business. Revenues for the second quarter of fiscal 2026 increased 6% to $57.5 million, from $54.1 million for Q2 2025, principally reflecting revenues from two acquisitions, which have not yet annualized.

Organic revenue was flat in the quarter, hampered by 2.2 million by $2.2 million decrease in professional services. The ongoing weakness in professional services continues to be concentrated in our utilities market, and we expect this to continue through the remainder of the fiscal year.

Overall, non-recurring revenue sources decreased 11% compared to the prior year. Annual recurring revenues increased 12%, to $183.5 million for Q2 2026, compared to $164.5 million for Q2 2025.

SaaS revenues grew 37%, and transaction-based revenue grew 7%. We expect elevated levels of SaaS growth the remainder of the fiscal year, and accelerating transaction-based revenue growth.

Overall, 80% of our revenues in the quarter came from recurring sources. Most of our expected software license sales for fiscal 2026 have and we expect lower levels for the remainder of the year.

Adjusted EBITDA increased 5% to $16.6 million for Q2 2026, from $15.8 million for Q2 2025. Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenues was 28.8%, a decrease from 29.3%.

Similar to last quarter, the percentage decline was driven by the previously mentioned investments in our justice tech market, higher hosting costs, and lower professional services revenues. While professional services margins are relatively low, the associated costs can lag revenue fluctuations.

We expect the adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenue to improve for the remainder of the year, and our long-term expectation remains 50 to 100 basis points improvements per year. Corporate expenses as a percentage of revenues were 9.3% for Q2 2026.

Adjusted diluted earnings per share from continuing operations for the second quarter of fiscal 2026 increased 10% to 32 cents, from 29 cents for Q2 2025. Again, please refer to the press release for a full description and reconciliation.

Balance sheet. At quarter end, debt stood at $81 million, and our cash balance was $7.1 million.

We still have $319 million of borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility, with a 5x leverage constraint. The expectation remains that we will use any borrowings for opportunistic acquisitions and stock repurchases.

The following updates our guidance for continuing operations for FY 2026, which was previously set forth in our first quarter fiscal 2026 press release dated February 5th. The outlook does not include acquisitions that have not been announced or transaction-related costs.

Revenue: $221 million to $229 million. Adjusted EBITDA: $61 million to $65 million.

Adjusted diluted earnings per share: $1.09 to $1.15. We expect recurring revenues to continue to grow at a double-digit rate through the remainder of FY 2026.

However, our view of non-recurring professional services has deteriorated further, leading us to guiding down the midpoint of our revenue range. Greg and I have alluded to margin strength in the back half of the fiscal year.

You can see that in our guide, as we expect to hold closer to our previous guide on EBITDA despite the lower revenue expectations. Looking past 2026, we expect better growth in 2027 and beyond.

To highlight several discrete items that will compound with our normal growth algorithm: ongoing boarding of courts in West Virginia and other states on our CMS platforms and other transaction-based revenues will continue to feed excellent ARR growth in our justice tech market. In our transportation market, near the end of fiscal 2026, we will turn on two long-delayed transaction-based revenue opportunities, the impact of which will be felt in 2027.

In addition, the insurance verification acquisition we made in Jan on January 1st continues to accelerate, and we will add multiple new state contracts in this fiscal year and the next. While professional services is not our preferred revenue source—we always pursue ARR when given the chance—we expect the professional services line to be far more stable than it has been in 2026.

Our long-term expectation of organic revenue growth remains high single-digit. From a seasonality standpoint, we currently expect our revenue distribution for the remaining two quarters to approximate the following: Q3, 48%; Q4, 52%.

I will now turn the call over to Rick for additional business-related comments.

Thank you, Geoff. Good morning, everyone.

This past quarter, we continued our focus on the AI-powered capabilities that create measurable value for government clients we serve by strengthening the core platforms they rely on every day. Our core platforms serve as systems of record, containing critical IP, sensitive data, and are designed with deep domain knowledge and experience.

An example of our AI-powered capabilities is our newly released ad hoc query and reporting tool, which allows users to extract meaningful insights from their existing data using natural language, without requiring lengthy custom report development or IT involvement. At last month's IUCX Conference, which is the leading utility customer experience conference for electric, gas, water, and wastewater utilities, the response to this new set of tools was immediate, with clients requesting access on the spot and citing the ability to compress what had been a multi-day reporting cycle down to minutes.

In addition, our AI-assisted document analysis and management platform brings the same philosophy to unstructured content, enabling clients to ingest, separate, extract, redact, and search documents throughout their entire lifecycle, providing our customer workforce with the tools to improve the value of their existing data and documents with an auditable, AI-assisted workflow. In both cases, human review remains at the center of the process, ensuring accuracy, traceability, and compliance in the regulated environments our government clients operate in.

What makes these capabilities particularly valuable is that they are designed as a platform architecture, not isolated point solutions. That distinction matters in an AI-driven market.

Both tools are architected to layer on top of any product within the i3 enterprise, which means the value compounds as adoption grows. For example, a client using our transportation or justice tech solutions today can extend these AI capabilities across their existing workflows without disruption to their data models or existing integrations.

This positions i3 to expand the value of existing relationships within our installed base, while simultaneously making our platform more compelling to net-new clients who are prioritizing durability, depth, and long-term efficiency in their technology decisions. Beyond our client-facing products, we are seeing meaningful gains in how we build software today versus a year ago.

We began with AI assistants across the enterprise, which in layman's terms simply suggest snippets of code to enhance overall code development, debugging, testing, among other uses, and now have moved to AI agent tools that plan, write, test, and modify code with minimal human intervention, and increase our product development capabilities, allowing us to pursue opportunities that would have previously required difficult trade-offs and prioritization, such as new feature development and product releases. Both AI-assisted and AI agent design tooling is elevating the user experience of existing applications, and automated testing through Playwright is improving our reliability and quality of our releases.

Playwright allows us to create a library of automated testing scripts that would run on a cadence of our choosing, without human intervention or action. Taken together, these investments are expanding what our teams can accomplish within a given sprint, letting us do more across our product portfolio without compromising on quality or our execution discipline.

We believe the work we're doing today in AI-powered product development will compound in value over time, as it is deeply embedded in mission-critical systems and workflows our clients depend on, strengthening our capabilities in our long-term customer relationships. I'll now hand the call over to Paul for revenue updates.

Thank you, Rick. Demand across our core markets remained healthy in Q2 as government agencies continue to prioritize modernization, improved constituent experience, and platforms that reduce long-term operational complexity.

Across procurements and active opportunities, we continue to see three consistent buying patterns: broader solution scope beyond a single core system; preference for platforms that support integrated analytics, payments, transactional services, and AI platform architecture that layer on top of existing features and benefits; and also seeking vendors that can scale from local agencies to statewide deployments. These trends continue to favor i3's market-centric model and our ability to provide integrated platform solutions.

From a commercial execution standpoint, we continue to see sustained interest across justice tech, transportation, education, and licensing and permitting. Increased multi-module evaluations, rather than single-solution procurements, all with integrated analytics, payments, transactional services, and AI-enabled workflows.

Justice tech remained one of our most active markets this quarter, supported by continued court modernization demand and strong alignment of our court line case management system, jury solutions, and transactional services. We saw increased customer engagement reflecting agencies' urgency to reduce workload, modernize workflows, and improve customer outcomes at both the state and local levels, creating increased interest in offerings that include payments, analytics, transactional services, and citizen access.

As i3 continues to expand and deploy our case management system footprint, we are seeing growing market awareness of the transactional services embedded in that ecosystem. Historically, case management system deployments served as the primary entry point, with transactional service adoption following as customers became operational and more educated on their value.

Over time, this created strong demand, but with long sales and implementation cycles typical of public sector system replacements. We are entering the next phase of this strategy.

With the ability to offer transactional services independently of a full case management system deployment, we have introduced another commercial motion that accelerates time to revenue recognition. This approach allows agencies to engage with transactional services first, which drives revenue for the agency, generating pull-through demand for broader software adoption.

As transactional services adoption grows, it strengthens our customer relationships and enables faster, more natural expansion into additional products and platform capabilities without requiring a full system replacement up front. In transportation, market momentum continues to be supported by AI-enabled verification and enforcement workflows, proven deployments that validate scale and reliability, and cross-sell opportunities expanding our platform reach.

Transportation continues to execute strongly within our platform-first strategy, delivering durable recurring revenue while deepening our role as a long-term modernization partner for motor vehicle, driver services, and motor carrier agencies. We further strengthened strategically important customer relationships by securing multi-year support and maintenance agreements and delivering multiple large renewals with disciplined pricing, reinforcing platform stickiness and long-term pricing durability.

Operationally, we remain focused on core platform execution and supporting future modernization efforts. Our recent acquisition has expanded our footprint as the market-leading insurance verification provider, while enabling tighter integration with payments and shared data services in the broader i3 platform.

Across licensing and permitting in our public administration area, agencies continued to expand platform scope, building on core implementations. Commercial trends include broader adoption of licensing and permitting and compliance modules, and an increased focus on citizen engagement and digital services delivery.

These dynamics reinforce higher deal values and longer-term customer relationships, and introduce AI as an accelerator. In the second quarter, we expanded adoption of AI indexing across new client agencies, demonstrating clear willingness among public sector customers to invest in practical, embedded AI that delivers immediate operational value.

These wins are also accelerating our broader sales actions, and we are compressing engagement timelines and driving significant pipeline expansion. In utilities, we continue to expand our platform capabilities with our i3 i360 customer information system and our UniFi 50 portal systems into a platform cloud offering.

These capabilities, including real-time analytics, help agencies streamline operations and improve customer experience and reduce friction across billing, payments, and service interactions. As adoption grows, we are seeing increased opportunities to extend these solutions through embedded payments and data services, reinforcing our platform approach and expanding long-term value in the utility market.

Education continues to be a strong, perennial performer for i3. This quarter, we opened up another state with the addition of Utah.

We are also pleased to report that close to half of our new sales for fiscal '26 so far are net-new customers. In addition, we have operationalized AI in development operations and product, with near-term plans to augment our customer-facing AI-powered reporting tools.

While deal timing remains product-driven, overall bookings activity reflects healthy deal flow across core markets, increased average solution scope for each opportunity, continued customer preference for SaaS delivery models augmented by integrated transactional services. Looking ahead, our commercial priorities remain centered on: sustained pipeline and RFP growth with both new from new and new from existing clients; expanding solution scope within existing accounts; and leveraging platform architecture AI capabilities as part of our sales and service delivery motions.

This concludes my comments, Cindy. At this point, we will open the call for Q&A, please.

Hey, good morning, guys. Appreciate you taking the questions here.

I wanted to start just on the non-recurring side. I know there's some headwinds this year, but you did call out high single digits is still the right way to think about the business.

Just what gives you confidence that that's the right longer-term growth rate? If you can also maybe just touch on what the key verticals are that you think can drive an acceleration back into that range over the medium term?

Thanks for the question, Madison. We touched on this a little bit in the script.

As you think about 2027, started kind of to give a little bit of breadcrumbs on that. Specifically, the justice market is going to continue to be a really strong ARR grower through that period.

That business, they have the West Virginia win, really starting to keep scaling. It has really good prospects as they land and expand those courts.

Our Resolve product, which is where we're assisting with revenue generation for these courts, is absolutely kind of the right product for the right time, with a very deep pipeline right now and a lot of implementation in front of us. We're really excited about that.

Transportation market also has a couple really solid things going for it, a couple long-term ARR things that have been years in the works and have been long-delayed, are finally going live. That'll be nice additive items.

Then the most recent acquisition, we touched on this, but just to hit it a little bit more, they currently have five states in implementation and several more that are kind of near line-of-sight. Just an incredible market position that they have there as kind of with the right-to-win status, you might say, as these states implement this kind of no-brainer solution to preemptively monitor for insurance on their registered vehicles.

They're in a great market position. It's going to be a great growth driver for the company.

That's a couple things that layer on top of our already existing growth algorithm. Then outside of the net dollar retention growth algorithm, which we expect to kind of remain in that sort of 103 to 105, hopefully push it a little higher kind of level.

We were 104 this last year, not expecting any significant changes there. The story this year and why the growth isn't kind of still up in that high single digits is the non-recurring stuff.

Our professional services specifically has gone from about $39 million to the current guide expect somewhere more in the high 20s on an organic basis, we'll have a little bit of inorganic in there. That's what has been revised down from the initial guide.

This coming year, as you look out to 2027, you don't have to expect that revenue line rebounds back up to $40 million nearly to see us getting back to a much better growth number that's in the high single digits, in line with our longer guidance. Even if that kind of maintains at the already kind of depleted level as it's at, you're already kind of there.

We have some things in the hopper that the give or take on that number is decently wide as always, because it's non-recurring. We have some opportunities in front of us that are still really attractive.

Utilities in particular has been kind of where some of the pain has been felt this particular year. That's a project that's still very much moving forward, and we still remain very excited about it and convicted about the market opportunity.

We've had to be a lot more patient than we would prefer, but that is what it is, and we're still going to get this thing done ultimately.

Okay. No, that's all very helpful color.

Appreciate it. Then just a follow-up on the 2026 outlook.

You did touch on this a little bit as well in your prepared remarks, but you took revenue down by about $3.5 million, and EBITDA only down $750K, call it about a 20% decremental margin. Just as we think about expenses here, to the extent some of these non-recurring headwinds persist, do you feel like you can continue to manage expenses to partially offset a big portion of those headwinds?

Do you think some of these efforts you're doing now set you up well to be in that 50 to 100 basis points of normalized margin expansion in FY '27, assuming the revenue also is more in the normalized range? Thanks, guys.

Absolutely. On margins, specifically, as always, there's a mix of things going on within that.

We've highlighted this on the last couple calls, as our professional services draws down, those costs lag a little bit on the revenue drawdown, especially in our utilities market, we had a lot of third-party contractors and things like that that were engaged in projects that we were able to kind of manage and mitigate. Then the same trends that we've been talking about for a little while are still present.

We have been doing less acquisitions, and as a result, we have been continually tightening up and improving efficiency and processes all over the business in multiple different pockets. We have been benefiting greatly from AI, and I think there's still more room to kind of benefit and expand there.

That goes for a lot of different processes and pockets within the company. Obviously DevOps, but there's probably not a single person within the business who isn't benefiting from this stuff in some form or fashion.

You're able to do more with less when you have attrition. You're able to consider, do we really need to backfill a role?

Things like that. Cumulatively, that's all adding up to a pretty attractive margin expansion situation.

We expect margins to be stronger the back half of this fiscal year. We still are making sure we invest in opportunities when we see those, to run right through them, the justice market being an example of that.

It's not all kind of reduction in cost. There are some pockets where we're really accelerating and pouring fuel on the fire.

The net picture is still a pretty attractive margin expansion scenario for us.

Thanks again for taking the questions.

Hey, good morning, everyone. Thanks for taking the question.

As regards the recent acquisition in auto insurance verification, when you win a state there, do you automatically get 100% share of the state's business, or is that something where it's different, maybe like a hunting license or you're one of several suppliers and so you have to compete for share?

The short answer is we would get 100% of their insurance verification. There's no scenario that we're aware of, and I think it's extremely unlikely that the state would ever try to bifurcate that.

There needs to be kind of a single system of record. What it does is basically civil penalties proactively being sent out when there's an uninsured motorist.

There needs to be a single system of record for that, and that's our software. There's not really a scenario where you would bifurcate that.

Now, that being said, this is sold into the Department of Transportation. There's a lot of other software that a Department of Transportation needs, a lot of which we provide.

The added footprint we have here on the insurance verification proves our market position to provide other features: motor vehicle, driver's license, some of the fuel tax solutions, truck routing, all the different things that a Department of Transportation needs to provide services to its constituents. That's where the competitive landscape is.

Got it. Okay.

If I remember correctly, that acquisition already had something like 18 to 20 states. Just I didn't write down whether you said you had three or five in implementation, but can you talk a little bit about the number of states that company has live, how many are in implementation, and then just the revenue model of is it geared towards the underlying population of the state?

Speaking in broad numbers, we're in the low 20s at this point. We'll be in the high 20s, I think, when you look back in 2 years.

Revenue model is like a lot of our software, I'll say flexible. This is generally SaaS.

There's some implementation revenues on the front end, and then SaaS. That would be sized based off of the size of the state, generally.

Maybe not quite like it's probably the type of thing where a larger state is definitely going to pay more, but a smaller state isn't going to get a proportionally lower cost necessarily. Then we also have the option to do transactional revenue here.

This is another classic situation for i3 where this company could monetize payments and wasn't monetizing payments, and absolutely will go forward. We've already got two states lined up for that.

They have a state that is a very small state that they monetize on a per-transaction basis, and that model has worked out really well for them. That state punches way above its weight relative to population.

That won't be the only state on that model long run. Then we can also charge for the presentment of these.

There's a lot of different levers we can pull. We can be flexible and work with the state for what works for them in their budget situation.

Great,

great. That one looks like it should be as that falls into the organic calculation, that one also looks like it should be additive to organic growth.

Absolutely.

Great. Thank you.

Thanks. Hey, guys.

Nice to speak with you this morning. A couple of questions.

Maybe one for Paul and Geoff, just around some of the AI comments. I'm curious sounds like you all are doing quite a bit.

Would just be curious to kind of understand where you expect this to show up most materially in the model in the near to mid-term, thinking about things like growth in existing relationships, new customer relationships, pricing, retention, maybe implementation timelines. Just help us think about how that sort of materializes from a model standpoint based on what you're hearing on the ground.

Thanks.

This is Paul. I'll get started on it.

We see that really early in the sales process, and we see the ability, because we've got a lot of domain expertise organized by market, to really hit the trigger points for where they're creating issues for our customers. It typically will start with the pain point reduction, and that may manifest itself in increased maintenance fees as we annualize on those conversations.

It may manifest itself in specific pricing related to an AI deployment on that. It just depends on the customer and the particular process for how that's working.

It also allows us, since the architecture is sitting on top of the AI component, and it's architected on top of our existing positions, it also allows us to affect those more quickly than we would if we were just doing that on a pure standalone basis and having to do deep integrations, because it's already our stuff and we're enhancing that program. I do think we're in early innings of that conversation, and it does appear to me that as we have customers who look at it and say, 'Hey, we're excited, and they want AI exposure,' in many cases they don't know what that means and or how to go about it.

We're trying to focus on tangible value add that can improve their operational efficiency or enhance their constituent experience much more naturally, which then tends to open up yet another opportunity and yet another opportunity. As we run down the road, I think we'll have more opportunities, but it also puts a little bit of pressure on us to continue to evolve in that fashion on a consistent basis, and we're structured to accommodate that.

We're excited about it.

Just to the financial model Alex, we obviously, we're experiencing benefits in the margin area already, but also absolutely in revenue. Rick, in his script, highlighted a couple discrete items where you're talking direct revenue that's result of functionality that's been added to the software that would not have been possible kind of in a pre-AI area for features and things like that that are directly taking advantage of the capabilities now.

The opportunities there are very large. I think over the next several years, there's just a lot of the pie of what can be delivered and the range of things that can be delivered to our customers, functionality of the software has just expanded greatly.

Then honestly, it touches a lot of other revenue, too, because when you think about how the software is built now, to answer in terms of what revenue is enabled by AI, it's going to be in a not so far-off future, it's kind of everything.

Got it. Thank you.

That's helpful. Then maybe just one follow-up on the sales front.

I think I heard 50% or about half of sales this year from new customers, if I heard that correctly. Maybe just to remind us how that sort of compares to the last couple of years.

Thanks.

That was for education, particularly. It's probably close to two times what their average would have been 5 years ago.

Education went

Cindy, we're here.

I think that

Think so.

Yes. Yes, sorry about

Thank you for your continued interest in the company. Stay tuned.

We're excited about our pipeline, our team that we put together, and thanks again. Call us if you need anything.