Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, I'm very happy to welcome you to our today's call on Schaeffler's financial results Q4 and fiscal year 2025.

Press release, the following presentation, and our annual report have been published today at 8:00 a.m. CET on our Investor Relations homepage.

For sure, we will provide the recording and the transcript of this webcast after the call. As a quick reminder, please note that all figures for 2024 are pro forma figures unless they are marked separately as reported figures, and the mentioned pro forma figures 2024 and related information are unaudited.

As always, Klaus Rosenfeld, our CEO, and Christophe Hannequin, our CFO, have joined the conference to guide you through the key information in our presentation. Afterwards, both gentlemen will be available for our Q&A session.

Now, let me hand over to our CEO. Klaus, please.

Thank you very much, Heiko. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to our full-year 2025 call.

You all received the numbers and the presentation this morning, and I would immediately jump on page 4, the overview with the key messages on the numbers. We titled it with "Resilience performance in an increasingly volatile and challenging environment."

When this title was chosen, ladies and gentlemen, we were not aware of the attack of the US and Israel in Iran. Let me, before I come to the numbers, quickly preempt some of your questions in terms of what's going on there, what does it mean for Schaeffler, and how do we think about this.

Three points there: The first one is, our presence in the region is very limited. We have no production there.

We have no bigger operations there. We have a small warehouse and some people in Dubai.

As such, there is very limited risk to our assets and operations. Second point is, clearly, the key thing to watch out for is supply chain.

You all know that a significant part of the trade that comes from Asia-Pacific and China to Europe is channeled through the Suez Canal, not through the Strait of Hormuz, but the Suez Canal. If that would be closed, if that would be impacted, that can have an impact.

We see that freight rates are increasing. That's certainly not a surprise.

We also have immediately activated our risk management systems and think we are at the moment unaffected, I shouldn't say on the safe side, but what can happen if this extends, if this takes longer than expected, then, for sure, there could be a supply chain situation where containers need longer, ships would go around the Horn of Africa. We have seen that before.

This is a situation that we can manage and that, as we see it today, will not have any significant impact on our business as we assess it so far. The third thing is then energy prices.

We are a company that produces, energy is important. Our main source of energy is electricity and gas, 2/3, 1/3.

We buy energy in a three middle three-digit million euro amount per annum. To date, around 75% of that is hedged for at least 12 months, the exposure there is small.

We are rolling it on a regular basis. If we would see increases there, the impact on our business should be manageable as well.

That's also my overall message here to you: The situation is clearly unfortunate. No one expected something like this.

We have seen geopolitical risk on and off. We can only hope that this comes to a quick and, hopefully, less damaging situation.

We think the immediate impact that we can see from this on Schaeffler is rather small and, in any case, manageable. Back to the numbers 2025: sales slightly below previous year on a pro forma basis, 23.5 billion.

The interesting number on this page is gross margin. What you see here is not the reported gross margin, but a gross margin that we adjusted.

The reported number is 18.4%, but it includes, compared to last year, one-off losses from the depreciation of SAP licenses, you know that from the previous quarter reporting, impairment losses on some intangible assets that relate to a previous acquisition that we wrote off, and also market-driven capacity adjustments in E-Mobility in Americas. When I adjust for this, and I think that's the important message here, you can see that the main health indicator of our business has improved from 19.1% to 19.9%.

That's definitely on the positive side. I watch, in particular, the gross margin development because I see it as the base for improving our profitability.

Chris is going to explain to you in more detail where this is coming from, but improvement in the production cost is here the main driver, and that shows that our restructuring measures of the past clearly pay off. 4% margin overall is an improvement of nearly 100 million compared to previous year again on a pro forma basis.

Free cash flow better than expected, and that's driven by the profitability, but also by the very disciplined capital allocation that we are known for. 266 is also the main driver why we said, let's more or less leave the dividend where it is, with 25 cents to 30 cents, that is what we are proposing to the Annual General Meeting.

When you judge the year, you have highlights and lowlights. I'm not going to read that all to you in the interest of more time for question and answers.

Our hedge model. It certainly becomes even more relevant in such an environment.

That we are diversification positive. You also know that we are a company that has always said we need to act ambidextrous with self-help measures on the one hand, but also growth opportunities on the other hand.

This table shows that we are on both sides making progress. The integration is on track, and we will continue, as we promised to you, to optimize our business portfolio.

The sale of the turbocharger business in China and also the closure of Schaeffler Ultra Precision Drives in Germany are just testimony of that. Geopolitical risk, I don't need to comment on this.

The macroeconomic environment is also not the easiest one, and for sure, we have headwinds in E-Mobility that we need to tackle. We have been brave enough to show you two divisions here and to expose ourselves also to this 2028 break-even challenge.

I still think that that's the right way to go. We are confident that we can make that, and the trajectory to get there is certainly something that is not just linear.

If you go to the next page, 2026, I don't need to read that to you, I just said this, but we are in line with the guidance for 2025 that was, as you remember, increased for free cash flow. That's the area where we also are better than expected.

For sure, free cash flow depends on lots of various factors in the fourth quarter that have resulted in this high achievement. I can already say here, this is not the result of pulling free cash flow forward into the year 2025.

The opposite is true. We managed it towards the end of the year very carefully going forward.

Page 8 is the sales growth. Also here, I don't want to go into too much detail.

What you see here is the flattish growth comes from a variety of different movements: Vehicle Lifetime Solutions up; Bearings & Industrial Solutions slightly up; Powertrain & Chassis down, you would be surprised if that would not be the case, also with the things that we have sold; and then E-Mobility plus 7%. One thing here is standing out, that's the negative performance in China and the positive performance in Asia-Pacific.

That's not just market. That also has to do with the fact that for one of our largest platforms, the EMR3 and EMR4 platform for a customer called Hyundai, the customer has moved this from a Greater China operation to a Korea operation.

That explains why Greater China is two-digit down and Asia-Pacific is two-digit up. The old program runs off, and the new program is gross in Asia-Pacific.

Page number 9, outperformance by powertrain type, nothing that you should be surprised about. This is just the continuation of what you saw in previous quarters.

We are outgrowing the market in terms of E-Mobility or let's call it battery electric vehicles plus 13%, while the other two powertrain types are lower than the market. You also see order intake, promising battery electric vehicle.

For the full year, 2 billion additional order intake over sales of 1.6 gives you a 1.3 times book-to-bill. HEV also going well, and ICE certainly, as expected, with a book-to-bill ratio below 1.

That is a picture that, from our point of view, shows again why it is important to have the hedges in place and why we think and why we are confident to make our targets in both divisions. Now, I will go through the next pages, Heiko, very briefly, because most of them are there for you reading it.

I've already mentioned the key messages. Page 10 shows you E-Mobility: good sales growth, strong order intake, and further gross margin improvement.

That's the key message here, and you see it in the numbers. For sure, that's a good starting point for the 2026 race.

Powertrain & Chassis, the key number here is we are able, although sales were not growing, and that has to some extent to do with the phaseout of certain portfolio elements, gross margin kept at a high level, even improved by nearly a percentage points. Order intake particularly driven by hybrid.

That, I think, is also a quite remarkable result for the year 2025. Then our shining star, Vehicle Lifetime Solutions, continued growth, strong profit margin, good fourth quarter, nearly everything in the same ballpark like 2024.

That business sits really very well and also projects positive development going forward. Then on Bearings & Industrial Solutions, you remember a year ago, we had to look at this very differently, had to push several ropes to bring this forward.

Now we see the first results from this: sales growth positive; outperformance certainly not yet there; book-to-bill one-to-one 1.1 times; and a gross margin that is slightly below. We are fully aware that there's further room for improvement.

When Chris is going to show you free cash flow, you will see that Sascha has done a lot here to bring the free cash flow generation of his business back on track. Now, 14, you've heard so much about new growth and what we're doing there that I will really cut this short.

You saw the latest news yesterday on this partnership with the Chinese company, that's number three, Leju Robotics, is a bigger player in the OEM humanoid space in China, probably number three, very experienced. It's interesting for us because they are asking for the full suite of products, not only just some ball screws or bearings, but also sophisticated actuators.

That really points in the right direction, and we are proud now that we can complement our European activities with Neura and humanoid with a premier player in China. If you go to this page and look at the last bullet point on the left-hand side, this is something that we have not marketed today with a press release, but that has happened this morning: We have opened a innovative humanoid lighthouse factory.

It's an innovation factory. It's not just production.

It is a one on one or end-to-end structure where you can innovate not only products, but also production processes, very much integrated in our highest sophistication, data-driven, super partners with NVIDIA and Siemens, everyone excited there, and clearly another sign that this humanoid ecosystem will take off and Schaeffler will play an important part in that, both in the various markets where we are active. I think the key message is, the activities are gaining traction.

There's still a way to go. For sure, you don't see this in the results at the moment, but we are absolutely positive on that development.

What we have seen in the last months is much better than what we expected in September 2025 when we started to market these activities. Same holds true for Defense.

Yes, this is a much shorter period since we started this. We are in the second phase of our program here that ends on the end of March.

Again, I would have not expected when we started this, Chris, that we would see first orders coming in. Some of you heard that Helsing got the approval for the drone contracts from the German government.

We are only waiting for the next days to come to sign our first supply contract with a player here, achieved in record time, and there's definitely more to come. We are very well positioned to grow in the defense sectors.

Yesterday, just one example, we had Lakestar with a two handful of defense players with us here in Herzogenaurach to see what we can do, and the interest is overwhelming. I would also like to add, and I've done this in the press, one more area that is interesting, certainly something that is more sophisticated and a new area, but very much linked to defense, and that's the space area.

Again, not just announcement, but something where we looked very carefully into product opportunities. What you see here on this little page, and I'm not going to go into more detail, is a reaction wheel.

Every satellite, whether it's for civil or military purposes, needs these reaction wheels. It's exactly something we can do.

Consists of motors, consists of bearings. It needs a system.

It needs power electronics, and we are already starting conversations with major players here to see whether that growth potential opens up new growth opportunities for us. This is the growth side.

I already said this: We look at this with an ambidextrous mindset. You cannot only do offensive, you need to do defensive as well.

I'm proud to say on page 15 that our performance program is not only on track, but is in implementation faster than expected. Just to put some numbers behind this: EBIT promised as an improvement for 2029, 100% achievement rate was 815, most of that from synergies, the other part from additional structural measures.

I can say, with the number in 2024 and what we achieved in 2025, we are nearly 40% there in terms of impact already in the numbers. If you sort of do that math in a similar way for the headcount reduction, we promised 4,700, of which 2,206, or 47%, have already left the company, and another nearly 30% are contracted.

It's fair to say that, as of today, we are 76% there. While some people still have to leave the P&L and the company, the remaining 24% should be doable.

I dare to say that we are able to deliver that program at least a year earlier than expected. What gives us confidence here is that all the negotiations with Works Council have been successfully completed.

The number of plants that we are closing has even increased with two more German plants, and that gives a lot of positive hope that we are able not only to deliver on the growth side, but also in further improving our cost base. Capital allocation, page 16, nothing really surprising.

We invested nearly a million, 0.6 times depreciation. Capital employed came down by 500 million in the fourth quarter.

You see that that is allocated as you would expect: one-time depreciation in E-Mobility, certainly lower in PTC, and VLS small at 0.5 times, that has to do also with investments into logistic operations, and B&IS also a very capital-conscious type of investment. I'll leave that for your questions and hand over to Chris for the further explanations on the financial performance.

Thank you. Thank you very much, Klaus.

I'll take you through the full year sales, EBIT, free cash flow, we'll talk briefly about the dividend. Before before we jump into it, maybe one comment on quarter 4, which is not in in the slide deck here, but is noticeably better than quarter 4 from the prior year, which was a complicated one, as you as you all know, with positive growth of 1.6% during during Q4.

A gross profit margin, once you adjust it for the one-off effects related to the impairments of some E-Mobility topics in North America, once you correct it for the other other impacts that we had in gross profit, is essentially 2% two points of gross margin above the prior year at 19.6%. Overhead's under control and EBIT, which is almost twice as much as the one from 2024 Q4.

Keep in mind, when you look at our numbers, Schaeffler and Schaeffler and Vitesco combined is not a group where you have a steady EBIT generation throughout the year or quarters because of the activities behind them, because of the industrial setup in some of our divisions has different physiognomy quarter-over-quarter over quarter. What I take away from quarter 4 2025 was a solid one given given the physiognomy of of our P&L and, for sure, significantly better than the the prior year.

CapEx was also held in check at 275 million during the the last quarter, and cash flow was substantially positive, as you can see in the in in the full-year numbers. If I go back to the flow of our presentation, and again, not not reading for every number on this on the slides, but if you look at sales and gross profit, adjusted for FX, we are more or less stable year-over-year, even more so when you correct for the fact that we have divested some building some businesses towards the end of the year.

EBIT, as profit adjusted, goes up goes up by almost one full point. You can see that on the top right.

If I give a little bit of flavor on the biggest contributor, which is the production cost bar that you see there, essentially our performance improvement and where we visualize most of our structural improvements as well. So, 281 million additional.

If I bring it back to divisions, the two biggest contributors would be E-Mobility by 117 million, which is again the proof point that scaling up and being efficient in our and being efficient in launching in launches in E-Mobility works. Then B&IS, 185 million additional contribution through performance and and restructuring.

A little bit of noise around around around it. Obviously, some costs related to our restructuring programs, you see in the 153 on the right side with Program Forward for 70 78 million.

The other point of note is our sensitivity to foreign exchange, where, at gross profit level, you see that the evolution last year cost us 168 68 million. Maybe one one last comment on our price policy or our price achievement: The 33 million that you see at the beginning is positively impacted by E-Mobility, which makes sense when you think about the messages around improving program quality and and business quality, and VLS, which is even bigger achievement given the context that they operated in.

PTC and B&IS are all neutral to slightly slightly negative, mostly due to the mix between between our products. If I move on to the EBIT slide, we continue with again with a similar logic.

The significantly improved gross profit contribution, some, again, apologies about that, but some noise still in in our numbers in R&D and SG&A, as we book restructuring costs and integration expenses, especially in in SG&A. On the R&D side, the only point of note above what I've just said is a slightly lower amount of R&D capitalization year year-over-year, shows as a as a negative, but it's not, per se, a a negative message.

On the blue 101 million, you see the cancellation, since we're talking about EBIT BSI, you see the cancellation of the items that are located on the left and that have not been adjusted yet through gross profit. All in all, a solid 0.5 point growth of additional EBIT year year-over-year, even though the readability again of our financials is still impacted by the the many transformations that we have going on in the in the company.

Going quickly through E-Mobility, and Klaus already spoke to to some of it, I will be very quick, with 7% growth on the on the sales side coupled with a very nice 6.1%. Yes, we're still in the negative zone, but moving from -22 to to -16%, mainly pulled by our business units around E-Drives and Controls.

If I was to take a regional angle in all regions as they go through different different launches of different different programs, the business is growing and is growing in a more profitable way. What is still missing, again, is the scale, that's part of the the roadmap, as discussed many times.

On PTC, slightly slight decline in sales, as as expected, also also impacted by some of the the sales of businesses towards the end of the year. Almost stable at EBIT level, EBIT BSI.

Again, I qualify that as a fairly strong center of resilience in the in that business where they are absolutely focusing on operating costs and portion of performance. If we think back about the EBIT bridge, we find some we find some of it.

VLS, I hope it never gets boring to say this, but continues to be the the success story that it that it's been so far, with another 5% growth year-over-year at the very high level of 14.8%, almost 15% EBIT level. It's even more of an achievement when you look at the growth of the platform business, which, although it's not a biggest part of the business, it is one of the strongest growth, with plus plus 32% almost, and it carries slightly less gross profit margins than the rest the rest of the business.

For them to hold stable means that they contracted that mix effect elsewhere through performance, growth, and and pricing. Another solid year for for VLS.

Bearings & Industrial, if we move to the to the to the slide, slight growth. What is more notable, again, is this combination of restructuring benefits and operational performance combining to deliver almost one point worth of additional contribution to the EBIT BSI line.

Some units within Bearings & Industrial, by the way, are growing at double-digit rates, aerospace bearings in Europe and North America being one of them. If we look at net income, still negative on a non-adjusted basis.

If you adjust it for the special items, net income is positive at plus 148, which is an important number for for us. We are doing what's needed to to restructure the business and drive and drive performance.

It has an impact on reported net income, but adjusted net income, again, is above the the zero line at at 148. No specific points to note on financial results.

On the taxes side, we are impacted by write-downs of our deferred tax assets, and that takes us to the -424 that that you have there. We move on to free cash flow.

Massive would be the adjective that comes to mind regarding the improvement year-over-year. A little bit careful with the reference for 2024 because we all we all know that there are some integration effects in there, but fundamentally, almost a billion additional cash flow year year-over-year.

Klaus mentioned, we did take some steps during the during the year in order to safeguard our E-Mobility launches, on one hand, and our overall business, on the on the other hand, and are carrying slightly elevated inventory levels in some businesses. I I say some businesses because, on the other hand, B&IS did a tremendous job in working down inventory levels.

We chose, again, to invest a little bit in in inventory in order to ensure that E-Mobility scales up properly and that we protect our customers against supply chain disruptions, next-generation semiconductors, rare earths, tariffs. You you all know the story for 20 25.

This is not a permanent state of things and will get worked on in 2026 for sure and the the following year. Contained spending on CapEx at at 974, below the the billion the billion mark.

None of the savings or none of the CapEx steering that was done had any impact on the future of our business. Said differently, we did not sacrifice future growth, or we did not sacrifice opportunity opportunities.

We just manage CapEx extremely closely compared to to the need and especially when it comes to E-Mobility ramp-up. Trying to avoid as much as possible to have capacity installed before it's it's truly needed, which, again, potentially protected us also a little bit against some of the swings in demand on on the E-Mobility side in North America.

We did have to take an impairment during during the year, but compared to some of our competitors or some of our customers, amounts are not I'm not going to say minimal, but they are they're fairly contained. If we move on to our debt profile, you see the result of the two actions done during the year, the two issuance of bonds, once during H1, the second one during Q4, both of them successful, oversubscribed at very tight and favorable market conditions, which again puts us in the right position as we enter into 2026, where we have maturities that are that are completely manageable.

Net sorry, leverage ratio ends the year at 2.1, slightly better than than what than what we had planned and approaching the top range of our corridor that we set up in our medium-term targets from 1.5 to 2.0. Not to say that we're satisfied about it, we of course will continue to aggressively work to to to bring that down, but progress is nice is noticeably there.

Dividend proposal made to the Supervisory Board and accepted last last week at €0.30, underpinned by a healthy underlying free cash flow of slightly more than half a billion. It allows for us to do what needs to be done in order to be consistent with our dividend policy and our dividend story over the years and share some of it with our shareholders.

It's a 5 5 cents increase, as you see, over over the previous year. Again, makes it's an integral part of our equity story, as as written there.

That being said, I will hand back to Klaus, who will cover the guidance for 2026, which was published this morning.

Thank you, Chris. To finish this up, page 29, full year '26 guidance.

We title it here "On our way to achieving mid-term targets, 2028." That's our commitment, and there is, as of today, no reason to deviate from these targets.

2026 is a rather conservative guidance. What I think is absolutely prudent in the environment we are in.

As I indicated before, the latest developments starting over the weekend is certainly not included here, but in terms of market assumptions, you see what we base this guidance off. If you read through this guidance, you see and take the midpoint of what this indicates here that we are rather flattish in terms of our sales activities.

This includes what we always said: none of the new growth activities will have a meaningful impact on top line in 2026. The rest, you can easily derive this from the four divisional guidances that we gave you, is a question of mix: E-Mobility growing, Powertrain & Chassis reducing, Vehicle Lifetimes with some growth, and also Bearings & Industrial Solutions that makes up the overall group situation.

EBIT margin, also here, when you take the midpoint, 4.5%, a slight improvement, and you see also the divisional ranges as well. For sure, yes, one of the key things that you may be concerned about is E-Mobility.

We have said several times, this is not a linear curve. This is something that needs to build over time, and for sure, the year 2026 will be decisive.

If you take the low end of this, yes, this could mean that in a worst situation, there is a EBIT that comes under pressure. Again, a range is a range, and what I just said, our ambition is to improve even in a situation where the markets don't allow for significant top-line growth.

Free cash flow, 100 to 300 is our commitment after 266. That also indicates to you that we are committed here to strengthen our free cash flow generation that has historically been high and will continue to be our key focus going forward.

I think, once again, this guidance is certainly rather conservative, but prudent. I don't know what KI does with this, but I know that this is something we can deliver, and I can promise that we will do the utmost possible to deliver it for you.

Let me finish with my last page and share with you the top three priorities for Schaeffler. Certainly, the top number one priority for us is further closing the gap to EBIT break-even in E-Mobility while delivering the order book.

The changes in the US have an impact on the order book that has been to some extent delivered, to some extent adjusted, but it's in an overall number still something that will allow us to grow that business going forward on secured business. The second one, as I said before, is to secure our operating performance by continuous self-help measures and portfolio optimization as promised in the Capital Markets Day.

I can tell you, we know how to do that. We have shown this over the years and will continue here to be focused on how can we help ourselves to drive performance forward.

The last but not least, we will continue to invest and go forward in our main growth areas: Humanoid, Defense, and Space as a new one. You should all remember that we said several times, we are doing this by leveraging existing capabilities and competencies.

These are not adventures. This is just an extension of our core business beyond the core, and I'm very optimistic that that will pay off in the next years without impacting the P&L both from the top line, but also from the cost side too much in 2026.

Let me finish with 31. After today, we will be available tomorrow for an analyst breakfast and a city roadshow.

Heiko and myself will then go to the US, speak to investors there that have been very interested in our development, and will then continue with several roadshows in Europe until we all probably meet again at the Hannover Fair at our Hannover Fair investor booth. AGM is on the 23rd of April here in Herzogenaurach.

You are cordially invited to participate if you are interested. I close here and to leave enough time for your Q&A.

Thank you very much. Back to Heiko.

Thank you very much, Klaus. Thank you very much, Christophe.

Since we have a number of colleagues already waiting in line, not to waste any time, let's directly hand over to the operator and take the first question.

Good afternoon. Thank you for taking my questions.

A couple, if I may. The first, to start with, on PTC: At midpoint, I think you guide down top line roughly by 7%.

Could you just give an indication what part of that is just the phaseout business or non-core ramping down, also that we saw within Vitesco, and how much do you see outside of that being a drag in '26? Then also on PTC in Q4: The gross margin actually dropped, I think, by around six points quarter-over-quarter and five points year-over-year.

Could you just highlight a bit why that happened, what was the main driver, and how we should think about that earlier in the year at the start of '26? Then on E-Mobility, also on the gross margin, it's actually negative again in Q4, quite a drop versus Q3 in the performance we saw there.

On an EBIT basis, obviously, you had a 50 million positive in other, probably offsetting part of that. Could you explain what drove the gross margin down?

Was it impairments on customer programs, or a bit more detail would be helpful there? Also how to think about compensation payments in '26 driving that margin?

Then just last point that I would have: You talked about order wins in Defense and potentially in other humanoid fields. Should we think about the order-to-sales time difference roughly being the same as for autos, meaning two, three years, or is it very different from that?

Thank you.

Let me, Christoph, let me start with the last one. Humanoid is different than Defense, and Defense is different than Space.

I cannot at the moment confirm that the order-to-sales time is two to three years. Defense is a new ecosystem for us.

If I take the Helsing contract as the first contract that we are close to sign, and that's a question of days, I think it's probably faster than two to three years. On Humanoids, we have gathering interest into prototypes, prototypes are naturally different than large-size orders.

There are, from the large players, more and more requests. How that unfolds is a function of how fast the application of humanoids is going to build up.

Everything I would say here is a speculation, let's leave it here. The proven sort of situation auto has to do with how that offer-to-order process works, and I would assume that in the two new growth areas, it's different.

We need to come back to you with something that is reliable, but two to three years as a sort of rule of thumb needs to be further analyzed, and then we come back. In E-Mob, yes, you observed correctly that Q4 had a drop in gross profit margin.

That's basically what I explained at the very beginning. You have three main items in gross profit margin that also go across the businesses.

The most important one for E-Mobility is the market-driven capacity adjustment in E-Mobility in Americas. As Chris explained, we took a one-off impact here that did not just went through the overhead, but through gross profit because we basically wrote off certain contracts, and that is the main explanation on E-Mobility.

126. That,

you said again?

126 million.

You add that back and see that adjusted figure, and it explains more than the reduction. You also have to some extent a proportional impact from the other one-off losses that went through gross profit.

Again, that's a little bit unusual, but it has to do with the way how you depreciate SAP licenses and also impair intangible assets. That's the main explanation on the E-Mobility side.

The health indicator here also after these adjustments points into the right direction. For PTC, I hand over to Christophe.

For PTC, the main impact, it's actually the impairment that we took on part of our chassis business. There's a 100 million impairment that was put to the books during Q4 impacting the gross profit on PTC in 20 in Q4 2025.

If you correct it for it, you are at a gross profit of 21%, which is slightly below the Q3 number of 23.6, but nothing of concern, again, when you take into account the annual profile of our results. Yes, there is a one-off in Q4, which I think is what you're seeing, but nothing structural as to the profitability of PTC.

Understood. Thank you.

Then

Thank you. Thank you very much.

Just a few questions, please. Klaus, can you talk a little bit about how the company reacts to the current volatile environment, which levers are you pulling to monitor risk, demand volatility in raw materials, and a little bit from the lessons learned of the last cycles?

Second, on PTC again, I would love to hear a bit more the confidence you have to deliver above 10% margins. I think part of that was already explained through the Q4 one-offs that you mentioned, but maybe you can just speak a bit more about PTC and how you sustain that 10% to 12% margin range in 20 in 2026.

Then finally, whether we should be thinking about any exceptional price recoveries in 2026 which could help the business overall in any of the given four divisions. Thank you.

Let me start with the last one, exceptional price compensation. I think we have done quite well in 2025 when you think about tariffs.

The tariff regime is under scrutiny, as everyone knows. What this means for us remains to be seen.

We are observing very carefully what's happening there, whether you can recuperate anything there, but that's a wait-and-see position. It's premature to talk about numbers here.

As you all know, we have, I think, achieved and also been recognized for this from our customers as a very balanced approach. I can say there is still a little bit of overhang from 2025 that will impact 2026.

We have also agreed internally that we will continue with that program and see that we move forward when it comes to claims, but also certainly defending claims in our direction. It's an extra effort that is needed here, but it's, I think, time and energy well invested.

The first one, Jose, I didn't really understood, but I think you referred to the current situation and how we are reacting to this.

Yes, exactly. Yeah.

I can say the company has a proven risk management approach. When we saw what happened Saturday morning, and there were already indications on Friday evening, we activated our risk management systems.

The processes worked. They started more or less immediately and came out with a first analysis on Sunday.

How does it work? You basically involve in this situation people from purchasing, from supply chain, from customer side, people from the region, people from outside the region, the sector intelligence, and the outcome was what I just said: For the time being, without knowing how this escalates further, and hopefully does not, the situation for us, based on a systematic risk analysis, is manageable.

As explained up front, both from the exposure we have in the region, from our supply chain risk, but also from the immediate cost risk, our raw material is not depending on oil prices. We buy a variety of things.

For sure, it's important that supply chains stay in place, and as it looks like, that's the case. That's what I can say.

We have seen geopolitical risk going off and on, and hopefully, this is also the case this time. Certainly not the best day to present numbers in such an environment, but we look across this, and for us, once again, is most important that we deliver on our promises.

Chris, you want to take the one on PTC?

On PTC, I would point to two things: A, the once you remove the noise and the background on 2025 performance, they are essentially able to match dollar-for-dollar, euro-for-euro, the decrease in the top in the top line on the on the bottom line, then we we we have some one-offs impact here here and there. The part of the reason to believe for 2026 and and the years after is, as E-Mobility takes a slightly longer course to deploy in some countries, it actually does pull a greater demand on our PTC production capability.

We are facing contract extensions. We are facing quotes on new businesses or extended businesses.

The the ramp-down on PTC is not necessarily as brutal in some regions as it was thought to be, the North America being the obvious example. This gives us, I guess what I'm trying to say, this gives us the even more room to transition our organization from one side to to to the other, from PTC to to E-Mobility, and manage the cost and the the restructuring that that comes with it.

As we said in our 2028 targets, we know how to deliver a 2028 vision based on performance improvement and restructuring that holds PTC stable. The recent evolution in the context gives a few more reasons to believe.

I'm cautious when I say this because the the offset of this obviously is on the E-Mobility side.

Thank you. Thank you very much.

Yes, hello. Good morning, and thanks for taking my questions, too.

I want to dig deeper again into E-Mobility and Powertrain & Chassis, especially with regard to the mid-term guidance. What I got from your presentation was that you said especially for E-Mobility, the results are scale-related.

When I look at the mid-term targets, that requires from here basically kind of 50% revenue increase, assuming that you meet the midpoint of your revenue guidance range in E-Mobility. I just want to understand, because we have seen that in '25, and we also, I think, we're going to see that in '26, that the top-line growth is somewhat limited.

You say it's not linear, but therefore, what is the trigger that it starts growing a lot more in 2027, 2028? If it doesn't, if there's no risk to the growth guidance, what actions do you take actually that you can make sure that the break-even can be achieved?

Does that mean now that we need to take into account maybe capacity adjustments, CapEx cuts also in E-Mobility? In a way, the question also holds true for Powertrain & Chassis, where you think that, over your guide for mid-term, from here, the revenues stay stable, but they are de facto declining.

How do you stop the revenue decline? I think if I remember back to the CMD, you said that the chassis business is going to grow, but maybe you can give an update how here the revenue growth is developing and why the revenues should stop declining if the ICE penetration rates decline de facto in Europe.

Then on guidance 2026, because in automotive, you guide for kind of flat automotive production, but you do not rule out that revenues decline in automotive when you take E-Mobility and Powertrain & Chassis together. I just want to understand basically what the lower end of the range would imply and if we should read the earnings guidance in the way that this is strongly linked to the revenue guidance.

If you achieve the lower end of the revenue guidance, you're also going to achieve the lower end of the EBIT margin guidance, or you have got self-help potential how you can avoid that? Thank you.

Horst, thank you very much for the questions. The key to growth is the order book, and we have shared with you for December 2024 an order book in E-Mobility of 14.7 billion.

Now, some of that has materialized in the year 2025 with sales. New order intake in 2025 for E-Mobility was 9.3 billion.

What is a book-to-bill ratio of 1.9. For sure, yes, we have adjusted orders during the year, to some extent due to the situation in the US and for sure to some extent because there are no volume guarantees, and some orders have volume assumptions that we don't think are possible.

What you have is you have an order book of 40 billion that sits in front of us where we have an increasing BEV and HEV share, where region China is growing. We said this this morning in the press conference that the growth in China in the order book is predominantly with Chinese customers.

All of that gives me enough hope that it's possible for the next years, certainly in an environment provided that the environment does not completely derail and destabilize, that it's possible to grow this business. It is up to us to deliver that.

It's certainly up to the customers to make sure that their cars sell. There is no guarantee for this, but there's a very good opportunity to make that happen, at least from today's perspective.

That's certainly also a function of the fact that we are well diversified and not only diversified across regions, but also with customers and with products. The fact that this is probably the most complete offering that we have and we don't need too much extra new orders to get there gives additional comfort.

In PTC, you can also do the same math here. The order book has reduced a bit because we delivered all these sales, and the order intake is not just compensating for this.

It's also slight adjustment, but it's still an order book of 30 billion that needs to be materialized. That, from my point of view, is again explaining why it is possible in particular in a world where HEV becomes more important.

You see this in the US, where our PTC colleagues are benefiting. PTC is also on other fields like sensors, like trucks, like two-wheelers.

I think that guidance for 2026, also complementing on what Chris said, is possible and doable. Yes, your guidance math, if you just take the lower ends, then you get two pictures that we don't foresee.

We typically look at this as a sort of one-by-one logic and say it needs to match for sure, it needs to match vertically, it needs to match horizontally. To put likelihood now against the situation where you would say low end always means low end in margin is, from my point of view, something that we have not done so far.

What do we have in our toolbox if we see that the first quarter, the second quarter doesn't work out as well? The key thing we're focusing on is cash flow, and we know how to manage this.

We have clearly a list of priorities on what to do and where to invest or postpone investment if necessary. That's not the case.

Let's be very clear here: We started well into the year with a solid January and also with a promising February. There's China's New Year in between, but I can say, both on the overhead cost side and also on all the other free cash flow elements, and certainly with plant performance, we are able to compensate, at least partially, if there would be a situation where our businesses don't grow.

That's something that we have shown before. It's certainly not what we think is realistic, but if that would come, we are prepared for this.

I can say, Chris, when all of this came, we have also in our latest board meeting said, if this becomes a little bit more difficult with the environment, what then happens, we will be more careful with spend, put in extra spend control, and I can only say that the organization is capable of playing the operating leverage game if necessary.

That's great. Good answer.

Just if I may sneak in a follow-up for Christophe, maybe. I've seen in your backup that your targets is more than 100% tax rate in 2026.

I wonder when that is normalizing. I think that's still related to this Vitesco consolidation and suboptimal tax structure, I thought it was cleaned up already in '25, seems to take longer.

Can you maybe give an outlook on the tax rate beyond 2026 as well?

That's a complex topic to tackle in two minutes. Happy to take that one offline at some point.

What I would say today is we are suboptimal in the way we are organized today. The work is ongoing.

You will see moves in 2026 to address this. It will not be a silver-bullet magic wand type of thing, but there will be actions that we should be able to communicate on, if I had to guess, during Q3 that will tackle a part of it.

The rest also has to come from an improvement in our cost competitiveness and the health of our business in Europe, which tends to focalize around the German tax pool. When will it normalize?

Not in a few months, but work ongoing, and again, happy to give you more flavor and actual numbers over the next few calls or during one of our meetings.

Is there, Christophe, kind of a target tax rate with regard mid-term 2028?

Horst, maybe I can explain it slightly with an additional thought. In the last years, we've always been conservative with balance sheet risk, and you see that we have more or less no deferred tax assets anymore on the balance sheet.

That's a good thing in an environment that is risky. That does not mean that the losses that sit in the system somewhere are lost.

You can think about this like being conservative on the balance sheet, therefore a high tax ratio, but in terms of cash that you can save because you can utilize still existing losses, that potential has not been given away.

Okay. All right.

That's great. Thank you.

Then

Yes, thank you very much, gentlemen. It's Ross MacDonald at Citi.

I had four quick questions. I'll keep them brief.

The first one is on the seasonality in the business. If I look back over the last two years, the first quarter of the year has typically been the highest from a margin perspective.

Obviously, the exit margin in Q4 is on the low side. Can you maybe talk around the seasonality that we should expect in 2026?

Would it be fair to assume another strong performance on the margin side in Q1 and maybe some of the building blocks behind that? I'm conscious that China is rather weak.

First one on seasonality on the margin for the 2026 guidance. Second one, just on slide 15, looking at the performance improvement programs at Schaeffler: Can you maybe talk around why, given there's 1,800 headcount reductions potentially in 2026, why we shouldn't expect to see larger P&L savings this year?

Looks like the year-over-year delta in the EBIT benefit from those restructurings is somewhat slowing, '26 versus '27. Just good to understand the dynamics at play there.

Maybe everyone leaves towards the end of the year, for example. Third one, on VLS, you're guiding again to 5% top-line growth at the midpoint, which is obviously very solid.

Can you talk around why you expect margins in VLS to be down slightly in 2026 and therefore no operating leverage in VLS this year? Then final one, apologies, that's been a lot, just on free cash flow: Can you give us the key moving parts for the free cash flow bridge?

Should we expect working capital tailwinds in '26? You've talked around taxes already, but just interesting how we should expect CapEx to develop, '26 versus '25, and the working capital trend.

Thank you.

Let me maybe take the ones in the middle, Chris, and if you take free cash flow, and I can also do the margin and the seasonality. Let me start with your interpretation of page 15.

You're going beyond what we have been thinking about. We gave you the actual figure that is certainly not a booked figure in a sense, but a figure derived from the implementation of measures of the 285.

By no means, I wanted to indicate that, as the column, the dark green column, is a lower in 2026, that this is now already the profile for what's coming next year. That would be wrong.

Please forgive us there. The shape of these bars is not proportionate to what you saw in 2026.

I have not even thought about this, but I will do this next time as you're obviously interpreting something into this. The way from 285 to 815 is nothing that is projected in this chart.

Otherwise, I would have put the 815 somewhere else. Forgive for that negligence, but we will take this away for next time.

In terms of the margin and the growth, yes, that's a legitimate question, why is the margin not improving? I would give you as an answer that this is, to some extent, a mix question.

That we have a Chinese activity in the VLS activity that is more a platform business. As that grows, it is slightly dilutive to the margin.

You can basically say the classical business generates more margin, the growth to some extent comes from these Chinese activities, and the blended mix is still at the around 15% mark. That, from our point of view, is certainly something that is healthy.

In VLS, yes, I would love to see all quarters boringly the same, but that's not the case. There were some issues here that impacted the margin that have to do with logistic investments and other things.

Take it over the year and don't interpret too much in a quarter. The fact that Q4 was down a bit also has to do with, here and there, changes in the programs.

In general, we are optimistic that we can stay over the year at that level. Chris, if you want to add something on VLS, please.

Otherwise, I leave you the free cash flow question.

I'll take the free cash flow. CapEx, you should expect something more or less in line with what we had in 2025, a little bit more.

We will work to phase down some of the working capital that was added in 2025 as we have a little bit more visibility. Again, I put this between brackets given what happens in the world these days, but as soon as we have a normalized situation, obviously we work on normalizing the inventory levels.

We are also getting better at E-Mobility launches, which was a significant driver of the buffer stocks that we implemented on upstream components in order to protect safe launches in 2025. As we get better and better at it, we can target more tailored inventories and not necessarily have as much, let's call it, excess inventory.

Coming back on the quarterly topic: Again, when you look at our business, you really need to take it piece by piece because the dynamics of our profits and the way gross profit and EBIT is generating during the year really, really varies. If I oversimplify things: PTC, it's automotive-driven, expect three quarters of solid performance and a typical fourth quarter where the OEMs will manage their year-end inventories and tailor down the demand.

Obviously, this has an impact on the efficiency of our plants. VLS, it's more or less the same things.

Normally, the bottom line, if I put myself at EBIT level, and if I take away the one-offs that we book here and there, it's normally a healthy, stable contribution throughout the year. The fourth quarter tends to be a bit weaker simply because what you're seeing flowing through is the increased cost per unit coming from the plants of the group that make the VLS parts running at slightly suboptimal parts.

E-Mobility, it's actually the flip side. Now in 2025, if you look at the quarter-by-quarter, you have many things that's happening: You have the relative scale-up during the year, but you also have the fact that a lot of the negotiations with our customers are only concluded in Q3 and Q4, which tends to lead to stronger invoicing on R&D, on cost recoveries during the second half of the year, and especially the Q4, which then tends to drive a better contribution, even though it's still negative, during the second half of the year.

B&IS, exact opposite: Normally runs full with efficient plants for the first two or three quarters of the year and is impacting during the fourth quarter by the sheer size of its industrial assets running at a slightly slower pace, again, in line with market demands. We are reacting to what our customers want us to do, whether they are automotive just-in-time type customers or distribution-type businesses.

For sure, very few businesses call for excessive inventory in Q4 in any year. Again, the readability of our numbers really to be done at division level and in understanding the seasonality of it.

To really wrap up on this: On some of our divisions, we have been working in 2025 and trying to balance the use of our assets during the year to try to avoid some of those ups and downs. The successful Q4 results in 2025 versus what happened in 2024 is one example of that.

We cannot shy away from the physiognomy of our businesses and the assets that are there.

Got it. Maybe just to close that point out: The Q1 trading then, should we expect a sequential improvement Q1 versus Q4 '25, just be helpful given the US weather patterns in the China demand, how you think about Q1 margin specifically for Schaeffler at the group level?

Thank you.

That was very quick, Ross. Can you quickly say it again?

No, really helpful color on the seasonality. It was just really just on the Q1 trading in 2026, how we should think about the performance of Schaeffler in the context of the full-year guidance given that you've had typically quite strong Q1s in '24 and '25, should we be expecting Q1 to be comfortably in the guidance range?

This was obviously not only VLS, but the whole group. Again, the pattern of the last years is nothing that is going to change over one year.

Typically, yes, we have been stronger in the first quarter. Let's see what this quarter brings.

I can only say what we saw in January so far, it was an encouraging start in the year in terms of profitability. How that continues now in February with China New Year and what's happening now in elsewhere around the globe remains to be seen.

It's really difficult to project. We're not forecasting and guiding on quarters, we're guiding on a full year.

Forgive us if we are not giving you more color than what we just gave.

Thank you.

Then

hello. Thank you for taking my questions.

Just if we can go back to your mid-term targets: Now, in E-Mobility, you have the order book, but I guess where I question most is B&IS, where you expect sales to be kind of 10% higher in 2028 at the midpoint, even though industrial production is basically growing 1% to 2% if we're lucky, and aerospace is still such a small part. Wondering if there's something we should think about in terms of growth dynamics there.

Then just another one on E-Mobility and the slower margin development in 2026: I might be wrong, I was under the impression that kind of 1/3 of that business, which is ICE, is already making good margins and the improvement potential is in the rest. There actually should be some offset within that division from slower EV adoption and mix benefit.

Maybe you could comment on that. Then lastly, congratulations on your announcement yesterday.

I was wondering if you could talk about your actuation capabilities in humanoids versus some of the Chinese competitors.

Thanks for the nice words on humanoids. Again, on the mid-term targets, we gave you the numbers for the group.

We have not given any divisional numbers, if I'm not mistaken, for mid-term targets. It's only group level.

Division level.

Oh, sorry. Then the division levels, but it's not in this book here.

Then I need to see the numbers again. It's in the CMD, I don't have the CMD page in front of me, my mistake.

I remember that we said we want to go to 10% to 12% for Bearings & Industrial, and when I see where we are, that basically means in '6, in '7, and in '8, an improvement that is we said 9% to 11%, sorry, my mistake. Forgive me, was a hectic day, I don't have this out of the top of my head.

So, 9% to 11% was the number and not 10% to 12%. If you take that and say it's three years to get there, then I need to deliver something around 10%.

That basically means that you have to further improve margin from 7.5% to 10%, that's 2.5 percentage points in three years. Is that doable?

Yes, for sure, that's doable. Knowing that we have some of the impact from our improvement programs not already in there, rolling in, yes, you also need a little bit of growth.

If the market becomes completely sour and only moves sideways, that would be, from our point of view, at least not the base scenario, then it becomes more difficult. I don't see any reason why, with this base now in 2025, with the assumption that the whole industrial production market will grow over the next years in a 2% to 3% range, it is possible to bring that into the 9% to 11%.

We need growth. We also need to push growth there, and you will see from announcements in the next months that this is clearly a question also of fight for market share.

It's, on the other hand, also cost improvement. When I see what happened from 2024 to 2025, when I see what we are projecting for next year, then that is certainly something that I see as a very realistic path in Bearings & Industrial Solutions.

Then

Yes, hello. Thank you for having my questions.

The first question would be about the business with humanoid robots and defense. Schaeffler stated that numerous partnerships has been concluded in the last couple months.

What further turnover are we talking about here when it comes to order intake or revenue? Also, can statements be made about the future margin targets in the business fields of robotics and defense?

The second question is about the business with E-Mobility. I'm wondering here a little bit what makes you exactly so serious to achieve profitability in 2028 because the whole market, especially in China, is quite under pressure when it comes to volume and margin, or do you see in other markets significant opportunities when it comes to margin improvements to come to your targets?

My last question would be about the restructuring costs: Are there any restructuring programs or costs ahead for the years 2026 and 2027? Would be very helpful if you could provide us with a little bit more color here because obviously you said that a big part of the restructuring costs and also programs are also gone in the last couple of years.

I'm quite wondering what is the target here for the 2026 or 2027 costs here. Thank you for my questions.

You're welcome. Let me start with the last one.

What I said is that we've always done it this way: We'll finish the existing restructuring program first before we think about new restructuring programs. This is a way to do it.

This is, I think, restructuring program number five that I'm responsible for, and we've always been doing good in doing this sequentially when needed. For the time being, at the moment, there is no new restructuring program necessary and also no new restructuring program planned.

If that changes, we will certainly think about what we can do next. We have that experience, and we know how to do that.

The second answer to your restructuring cost question is what I said is that we have booked all the provisions on the balance sheet to be able to now pay the necessary restructuring outflows. That means from a balance sheet point of view, yes, we have enough provided for the existing programs.

For new programs, that would be an extra decision we need to take. I can also say that, for the time being, also with the speed in terms of realization, what we see in terms of the average cost we need per headcount, it looks like that our restructuring costs are rather conservative, that having said, meaning that they are rather rich than too small.

E-Mobility, again, you ask an interesting question. For sure, E-Mobility is not only China.

There are also other markets that start to embrace and discover E-Mobility. One of the markets that is quite interesting to observe is India.

We have, by the way, from China now being localized to India a program with a major OEM in India, a name that you all know, called Tata. What we see there in terms of interest and volume is certainly not being a surprise growth driver that takes over the Chinese development, but it's something very interesting that also in other markets the application of E-Mobility starts and plays a role.

If India continues to grow also as an alternative to the Chinese market, and for sure India is important to us, that could be an interesting mid-term opportunity. On humanoids, as we said, we are in a starting situation here.

We don't book at the moment any bigger revenues except for revenues for prototype orders, but we see that the interest is increasing and increasing. I'm 100% sure that we will, during the next years, build a proper order book there, and therefore, we remain on track to deliver on that opportunity.

As we always said, it's nothing for 2026, only minimal impact in 2027, but the long-term opportunity from this business is huge.

Understand. Thank you.

Welcome.

Thank you very much. Being respectful of your time and ours, let us close today's call.

Thank you for your continued interest in our company. Thanks for the questions.

Thanks a lot to the speakers. Of course, thank you very much to the team for the preparation.

As always, if there are questions afterwards, feel free to reach out to us. Happy to see you tomorrow during our roadshow in London.

With this, thank you very much. Have a nice rest of the day.