Operator
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. My name is Calvin and I will be your conference operator today.
At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Lucky Strike Entertainment Q2 2026 earnings conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise.
After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number 1 on your telephone keypad.
If you would like to withdraw your question, please press star 1 again. Thank you.
I would now like to turn the call over to Bobby Lavan, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.
Bobby Lavan
Good afternoon. This is Bobby Lavan, Lucky Strike's Chief Financial Officer.
Welcome to our conference call to discuss Lucky Strike's second quarter 2026 earnings. Today, we issued a press release announcing our financial results for the period ended December 28th, 2025.
A copy of the press release is available in the Investor Relations section of our website. Joining me on the call today are Thomas Shannon, our founder and Chief Executive, and Lev Ekster, our president.
I'd like to remind you that during today's conference call, we may make certain forward-looking statements about the company's performance. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and, therefore, one should not place undue reliance on them.
Forward-looking statements are also subject to the inherent risks and uncertainties to cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed. For additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in our forward-looking statements, you should refer to the cautionary statements contained in our press release as well as the risk factors contained in the company's filings with the SEC.
Lucky Strike Entertainment undertakes no obligation to revise or update any [forward-looking statements to reflect?] events or circumstances that occur after today's call.
Also, during today's call, the company may discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures as defined by SEC Regulation G. The GAAP financial measures most directly comparable to each non-GAAP financial measure discussed and the reconciliation of the differences between each non-GAAP financial measure and the comparable GAAP financial measure can be found on the company's website.
I'll now turn the call over to Tom.
Thomas Shannon
Thanks, everyone, for joining today's call. We finished the December quarter with a positive same-store sales comp of +0.3% and total revenue growth of +2.3%.
The result was driven by continued strength in both our retail and league businesses, while we made steady progress turning around our events business, which ended nearly flat for the quarter, its best showing in years. Retail and leagues performed well throughout the quarter and provided a stable foundation for the comp.
Events, which had been the primary drag on same-store sales over the past several quarters, inflected meaningfully in January. The changes we've made to the events organization, pricing, and funnel are beginning to show results.
January started off with strong double-digit results. We saw 1 week of headwinds from the biggest snowstorm this country has seen in a while, and then a return back to momentum of strength of retail, leagues, and events.
During the quarter, we made deliberate investments in payroll, marketing, and elevated activity levels to drive traffic and return the business to positive same-store sales growth. A number of these investments delivered attractive returns and helped establish positive momentum, particularly in retail, leagues, and the early stages of the events turnaround.
However, not all of the spending generated the ROI we expected, with incremental labor in particular weighing on profitability. As a result, while we remain focused on driving organic growth, we are shifting toward a more balanced approach that places equal emphasis on same-store sales growth and EBITDA expansion.
Going forward, investments will be more targeted, more measured, and held to a higher return threshold. In January, we also closed on the acquisition of Raging Waters, the largest water park in California, which will contribute meaningful EBITDA in the June and September quarters.
When combined with Wet 'n Wild Emerald Pointe in North Carolina and 3 new family entertainment centers we've acquired, we expect a significant seasonal lift to earnings as we move through the summer months, reflecting the continued diversification of our portfolio. On the brand front, we opened Lucky Strike Aliso Viejo in Orange County, California in December, and early results have been encouraging.
We now operate approximately 100 Lucky Strike locations and remain on track to sunset the Bowlero brand by the end of this calendar year. Conversions to Lucky Strike have delivered strong lifts, and simplifying the portfolio to 2 cohesive brands, Lucky Strike and AMF, will drive efficiencies, particularly in marketing spend.
At the same time, we plan to roll out a refreshed AMF look later this year that leans into the brand's more than 100-year history. This evolution strengthens our value-oriented offering while clearly differentiating it from Lucky Strike, positioning the portfolio for profitable growth and improved returns.
With that, let's turn it over to Q&A.
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question-and-answer session. As we answer Q&A, we ask that you please limit your input to 1 question.
To ask a question, please press the star button followed by the number 1 on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, please press star 1 again.
One moment, please, for your first question. Your first question comes from the line of Steven Wieczynski of Stifel.
Please go ahead.
Steven Wieczynski
Hey, guys, good afternoon. Bobby, this is probably for you.
I guess as we kind of think about the results we've seen here, I'm surprised you guys didn't elect to kind of lower the EBITDA guidance for the full year, at least maybe bring the high end of that range down based on the EBITDA generation through the first 6 months. You guys would need to see a pretty significant uptick in the second half of the year to kind of get inside of that range at this point.
I guess my question is what makes you guys still confident in getting into that range, and look, I understand your commentary you just made about how strong the start of the year has been.
Bobby Lavan
Yeah. I see you.
If you think about from a numbers perspective, the past 2 years we've had this $300 million business being really a drag on our results. It's a drag on our financial results, but also events is sort of tip of the spear as a lead gen for the business.
That business has turned, as Tom said in his commentary and we said in the press release, that business had organic growth in January, February. When you compound that with retail being up mid-single digits, league being up mid-single digits, we're still within the paradigms of our guidance.
When we talked last quarter, we were very focused on people not getting super excited about the December quarter because we still had this corporate events business, which was front-end loaded in December. As expected, corporate events are down, but then you got into the third and fourth week of December and our consumer events and our retail were on fire.
The first 3 weeks of January, the business was up double digits. Our confidence in the business is very high.
We invested to get there, and now we need to pull back some of those investments. We're definitely still within confines of our guidance we gave out in August.
Steven Wieczynski
Bobby. That makes sense.
Then maybe if I could add one more real quick. Want to ask how we should think then about kind of how the flow-through would look for the rest of the year.
Obviously, you guys were investing, it seems like pretty heavily, in the corporate events business and turning that around through December. Maybe a better way to ask that is how much of a drag was that on margins in your second quarter?
Hopefully that makes sense.
Bobby Lavan
There were two there were 3 buckets, I would say, of direct drags. Center payroll on comp basis was up $6 million year-over-year, right?
Two, we talked about and we flagged very heavily the marketing investment. Marketing investment on a year-over-year basis was up $4 million, and the marketing team investment on a year-over-year basis was up $1 million, right?
Ultimately finding the right balance on those numbers and organic growth is what we think we've gotten to in January. We're very happy with the January results, but we're going to ultimately optimize those numbers to make sure that we're getting the appropriate flow-through.
From our expectations, you should see margin growth in a material way in the fourth quarter as all the water parks in the Boomers go from being a few million a quarter of drag to significant EBITDA.
Steven Wieczynski
That's helpful. Thanks, guys.
Really appreciate it.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Matthew Boss of JPMorgan. Please go ahead.
Matthew Boss
Great, thanks. Could you elaborate on progress with your initiatives that you've made to date to rebuild the events business, or specifically drivers you think underlying this recent inflection in the events business relative to the headwinds that you faced on that side of the house in the first half of the year?
Bobby Lavan
We chased price for 2 years. If you called us and you wanted a discount, we would give it to you.
Now discounts are an important part of any sort of location-based entertainment company. If you call in the summer for Monday afternoon, a discount is warranted.
If you call for a Thursday at Times Square in December, we shouldn't give you a discount because the demand is greater than the supply. In September, we built out dynamic pricing reporting systems, and when we looked at where we were tracking in September, we were tracking for our events business to be down double digits, and we brought it all the way back.
That was really less through volume and more through dynamic pricing. That is something that has dramatically changed over the past few years.
The volume, it's hard on the corporate side. That's business that we need to build functions to kind of build our marketing function to get our name out there more.
Also our marketing, which has really helped the kids' birthday parties and consumer parties. Pricing has been paramount, and also the partnership with marketing is really a sea change for the business.
Matthew Boss
Maybe to that point, Bobby, could you elaborate on which investments you made in the second quarter that you saw translate directly to an improved traffic or same-center comps? Then just help us to think about the continued investments as we think about the third or the fourth quarter as I think you mentioned balancing margin in the back half of the year, and particularly it sounds like the fourth quarter.
Bobby Lavan
I'm going to hand it over to Lev because he's...
Lev Ekster
Hey, Matt. You saw we made a significant increase to our marketing budget, and that was an investment in building our brand and increasing the brand awareness.
We feel like it was, for the most part, a pretty worthy investment. In fact, we saw our media impressions in the quarter increase 200%.
Q2 of prior year, we had 340 million impressions. Q2 of this year, we exceeded over 1 billion impressions.
That also converted. We saw online revenue increase 28% year-over-year, and booking conversions improved 2x.
The rebrands of Lucky Strike, of which we did 30 in Q2, are also bearing fruit, and we anticipate being done with all of those rebrands this calendar year, which would put us right around 280, 218 Lucky Strike locations. When you consider the efficiency of going from 3 brands to 2, it really helps our national awareness.
I also want to mention that the marketing investment increased our share of voice. Our search impressions climbed significantly.
In fact, it was a 520% increase. We also saw efficiency with our CPMs decreasing by 38%.
From a high level, marketing increased, but largely as an investment in brand building, and we saw the benefits of that in January, and I think that's going to continue as we scale the rebrands of Lucky Strikes.
Matthew Boss
Great. Best of luck.
Lev Ekster
Thank you.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Jason Tilchen of Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.
Jason Tilchen
Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question.
I was wondering if we could talk about the food and beverage sales that you saw during the quarter. It was a little bit below what we were expecting, and I'm just curious sort of how attach rates trended, and what are some of the benefits you're starting to see from sort of the increased emphasis on training and some of the tablet implementation that you guys are rolling out?
Thanks.
Lev Ekster
Our retail comp was just shy of 2% at 1.7%, but our retail food was at 10.9%, it continues to outperform. While alcohol was a bit of a drag, with retail alcohol down right around 4.7%, we saw that our retail non-alcoholic comp grew more than the drag.
That increased 26.2% or $2 million. In terms of food and beverage, it's pretty dynamic.
We're seeing obviously as a society the decrease in alcohol consumption, but we continue to invest in our zero-proof program. We launched, as you remember, craft lemonades earlier in the year.
That has a run rate of over $5 million, and with the success of craft lemonades, later this quarter we plan to introduce dirty soda programming to our traditional properties and boba drinks to our experiential properties, and we anticipate similar results. We're also, for the first time ever, going to introduce a zero-proof program to our AMF properties, our traditional locations.
They've never had a mocktail program. We're just changing with the times, investing more in zero-proof, and it's working.
What also is working is our tablets. We introduced server tablets.
Today we sit at 125 locations with server tablets, and we're seeing the average check size increase about 7% with increased gratuities for the associates using the server tablets. By March, we're going to have server tablets in 160 of our locations, and we're going to continue to evaluate as we scale that.
Ultimately, as Tom mentioned, we increased service labor in Q2, and some of it worked and we saw retail comp growth. Some of it was inefficient and we have to evaluate that.
We've actually recently trimmed some of our least profitable operating hours as a result of that, and we're looking at in and out times of our associates to make sure that they're very productive. That investment in labor, increased service labor for our guests, and our increased hospitality training is working because we've now seen for 14 straight months our NPS score comp from prior year.
In fact, it hit our highest point of 78.7% in October. From a hospitality perspective, from a retail growth perspective, the service is working.
We just want to optimize it.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Ian Zaffino of Oppenheimer. Please go ahead.
Ian Zaffino
Hi, great. Thank you very much.
I know you guys mentioned some of the investments that you're making and not being the return that you're expecting. Can you give us maybe kind of particulars of what was unexpected, I think you mentioned labor, but anything else?
Then how are you actually accounting for some of the line items as you get to the return that you want to get to? Thanks.
Bobby Lavan
The investments are focused on center payroll, marketing, infrastructure at the water parks, Boomers, and then what I would call the other bucket or the incremental activity bucket. The center payroll, as Lev spoke at, we look center by center.
We look at the amount of payroll we added, and we identify where that payroll delivered a return or didn't deliver a return, right? Returns are in this world, ultimately average labor is going to cost you $25, $30 an hour, and if you're not getting the revenue to justify that, then you shouldn't be investing in labor, right?
We're in the incremental margin business. The incremental revenue has to be greater than the incremental cost dollar.
From a marketing perspective, right now we're injecting capital into a system that has generally been starved of marketing. We're watching impressions very strategically.
We are testing market by market. The first market we leaned into was New York, New York City.
We increased marketing spend. We rebranded Times Square, Chelsea Piers, Lucky Strike, and both of those centers comped double digits in the second quarter, right?
At the same time, we have a state like Colorado where we have a hodgepodge of Bowleros, Lucky Strikes, and AMFs, it's harder to test that marketing spend, and that's why the rebrand is so important to get done this year. As it relates to the water parks and the FECs, these businesses have been starved of management labor.
We think that there's massive opportunities on awareness, on investing capital into these locations. We saw that with the robust performance at Boomers, Destin water park that we bought a year and a half ago.
That water park was up 20% year-over-year last summer, we continued to lean into that team, but that team does drive a multi-million-dollar drag in the off-seasons, but then you get that EBITDA and more back. Then the one that we found had the least returns was just kind of incremental activity.
We had more programs. More programs mean that you're spending money faster.
You're ultimately dealing with marketing materials, collateral in the centers, uniforms that you're not being as efficient. Those are the things that we're going to plan better, pull back on, and really focus on service labor and marketing that drives the top line.
Your
Operator
next question comes from the line of Eric Handler of ROTH Capital. Please go ahead.
Eric Handler
Good afternoon. Thanks for the question.
We're now about let's call it 3 and 1/2 months away from Memorial Day when a lot of the regional water parks will be opening. When customers show up on a like-for-like basis, where are they going to notice the biggest changes in operations?
Thomas Shannon
Hi, this is Tom Shannon. We've been investing in all of these assets really from shortly after we acquired them.
One of the reasons that Big Kahuna's in Destin was up 20% is it got a comprehensive facelift. It was done very efficiently.
It was done largely with in-park labor, but there was a lot of rot, literally, in the park where you had things like bridges that were dilapidated, fences that were not appealing or maybe even structurally sound. The team in the off-season went through the entire park.
They rebuilt 7 bridges. They probably replaced half of the fencing.
They painted literally everything, gel coated the slides, replaced malfunctioning pumps, lighting, et cetera, and the park looked effectively new, and the customers responded. We've done the same on the Boomers.
The preliminary numbers I have on the Boomers, the legacy Boomers that we've owned for more than a year, they're up in revenue 25% over the last 2 weeks. That's 6 large locations from Boca Raton, Irvine, Livermore, Modesto, et cetera.
They all benefited from meaningful capital investment and some very efficient capital investment. I think you're going to see that in all of the parks, with the exception probably of Raging Waters, which we literally just closed on.
We'll do our best to upgrade aspects of that, but when the guest comes, they're going to see something they haven't seen in a long time, and that is a really refreshed, really appealing, and upscale water park or family entertainment center. Where we've made the investments, we've seen the return.
I think we've seen a better return than we would have reasonably expected or even hoped for.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Eric Wold of Texas Capital Securities. Please go ahead.
Eric Wold
Thank you. Good afternoon.
Kind of following up on the very first question out of the gate around the guidance range, Bobby. I guess January done, 5-ish months left in the fiscal year.
Maybe talk about the biggest variables between kind of the $50 million high-end, low-end range of revenue and $40 million on EBITDA, the biggest variables that would take it, in your mind, from the high end to the low end or vice versa, and then which of those are most in your control, like marketing, maintenance, something like that, versus something that maybe is a little less out of your control?
Bobby Lavan
Yeah. If you go first 6 months, the comp is flat, right?
The comp is unbelievably easy for the next 6 months, or 5 months, I guess, on the events side, right? Additionally, leaning more into summer season pass, last year we did $13 million.
We think we can beat that significantly this year. Most important is going to be how profitable the Boomers, Emerald Pointe, which is the biggest water park in North Carolina, Raging Waters, which is the biggest water park in California, Raging Waves, biggest water park in Illinois, all of these we've invested in.
We've done what we did to the legacy Boomers. You remember we bought the legacy Boomers for $27 million, and those properties are doing $16 million of EBITDA at this point.
We think we can get to not exactly there, but close on the water parks. How profitable the water parks come with the capital invested is really kind of the main driver in the fourth quarter.
In the third quarter, we started January strong, right? We started January strong.
If it wasn't for this snowpocalypse that happened, we would have been up double digits on a comp basis in January. We're still up.
We had a great month. We'll see a ton of operating leverage that month.
The thing that Tom put in his quotes in his press release is we're committing to taking down the inefficient spend, right? The difference between the top and the bottom is going to be performance in the water parks, maintaining good organic growth, but also us getting costs under control.
Your
Operator
next question comes from the line of Michael Kupinski of NOBLE Capital. Please go ahead.
Michael Kupinski
Thank you for taking my questions. Obviously, you're anticipating that the water parks are going to contribute meaningfully into the fourth quarter, I plan to get a little granular here and sorry for the questions.
In terms of Raging Waves, you indicated that it came with a lot of land and I know that you had planned to build out some event space there and maybe do some expansion. I was wondering if you had already done that.
Then part of the growth that we saw last year, I think you said that you introduced alcohol and that you saw a little revenue lift from that, and was wondering if your Raging Waters in California, if that was part of the acquisition plan, if that already had alcohol, they had that there, is that part of introduction that you can see a little lift from that as well? Then I guess in terms of other investments into the water parks, are there other expansion plans that you have either done or contemplated for those?
Thomas Shannon
Hi, this is Tom Shannon. Thanks for the question.
With regard to Raging Waves, we did add some covered event spaces with open sides, and those were open for the last season. We also got a beer license in the middle of 2024 and we had that last year.
That contributed a couple hundred thousand dollars of alcohol sales. We're increasing food and beverage availability throughout the park for this year.
We've sort of reconfigured the flow as you walk in and where we've placed certain food and beverage outlets to optimize that. I think you'll see continued lift.
We purchased 66 acres adjacent to that park. We haven't done anything with it and we don't have any plans at present.
We were going to embark on a pretty meaningful expansion of the park with the addition of an action river, a family pool, and an adult pool with swim-up bar that would have increased the in-park capacity by somewhere between 1,500 and 2,000 people. Unfortunately, we weren't able to get through the permitting process in time to start construction this year, so that'll be deferred to next winter for a 2027 summer opening.
With regard to Raging Waters, it does not have a liquor license. We will be applying for a liquor license.
That will not happen for this summer. Hopefully we'll have that for the following summer.
Given the volume of that park, that should be a meaningful number. I don't recall if there's anything else you asked that I haven't covered.
Please let me know.
Michael Kupinski
Outside of alcohol in terms of the prospects for growth there, is there other land that you're getting, other expansion plans done in the future?
Thomas Shannon
We have expansion opportunities within the confines of all of the parks. None of them are built out to their capacity, over time the answer is yes.
I think that you have a lot of very low investment, high-return opportunities. For example, in Big Kahuna's in Destin, you could do a lot of rides and make the park sort of more dynamic and exciting, but the gating factor there is really there's not enough deck space and lounging space, which is relatively inexpensive.
We focused on those sorts of things. We have ambitious expansions planned, as I mentioned, in Raging Waves, also in Shipwreck Island in Panama City.
We're doing a number of upgrades over the next 2 years at Wet 'n Wild Emerald Pointe, which is a very large, high-volume park. We're adding a meaningful kitty/family area.
There'll be upgrades to the cabanas there, which sell out nearly every weekend. We're adding something like 40 or 50 cabanas that will be in place for this coming season.
There's a lot of that sort of stuff, relatively inexpensive, very high ROI, has a big impact on the guest experience. We also have things planned like a slide tower complex at Shipwreck Island in Panama City that we hope to have in place for the '27 season, the expansion I mentioned at Raging Waves for the '27 season, and also some things that we'd like to do at Raging Waters.
For the most part, these parks are in pretty good shape. It really comes down to being able to increase revenue through simply having more availability of food and beverage, more cabanas to sell, and then optimizing pricing and packages, which I think we've done a pretty good job on for this upcoming season.
Michael Kupinski
Thanks for the color.
Thomas Shannon
My pleasure.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Greg Miller of Truist Securities. Please go ahead.
Greg Miller
Thanks. Good afternoon, all.
I'm hoping you could provide some help in terms of getting a better understanding of how we should be thinking about, say, the next 50 or so Lucky Strike conversions relative to the first 100. How similar or different are these stores from a demographics perspective, locations, the types of stores, in part in terms of how we should be thinking about the ramp of these rebranded locations over the course of the rest of the year?
Thank you.
Thomas Shannon
Sure, this is Tom Shannon. There's no difference.
It's not like we started at the top in terms of revenue and went down. A lot of what got converted was a function of how quickly they moved through a permitting process.
As we deal with a lot of permitting issues in a lot of municipalities. Some are very easy and efficient to deal with, some are not.
The pace at which these things happen is somewhat dictated by an external audience, which is municipal governments. There is really no difference between the next 50 and the first 100.
What is going to happen, and this is really important to note, is that we are going to build out critical mass in most if not all markets with the new Lucky Strike brand. I think Bobby mentioned that we have markets like Denver where you still have 3 brands and you may have 4 or 5 Lucky Strikes out of 20 centers.
It's not enough to do any meaningful marketing because you just can't amortize the spend over enough centers. When you get to call it 15 Lucky Strikes in the market, you're able to do that, and you're also able to do that on a national basis.
I think the returns will accelerate, and Lucky Strike will become a very, very powerful brand once we have 200 locations, which we expect by the end of calendar '26, and we're able to put real marketing muscle behind it in a way that's never occurred before. You're going to start to see a lot more relevance and unaided awareness of Lucky Strike, and then following that, AMF.
Just to sort of flesh out the point, AMF as a brand has probably had no meaningful marketing spend in 3 or 4 decades. It doesn't mean anything at all.
The same is largely true of Lucky Strike. When Lucky Strike first launched back in, I believe, 2003, it had a lot of excitement around the brand.
It was on Entourage. It was really considered a cool brand, and then it really died and no real money was spent on the brand.
We're going from an environment of little to no investment over a very long period of time to one now where we have, or soon we'll have critical mass in 2 brands that we're going to be investing serious marketing effort behind, and I think the upside in both of those is tremendous.
Greg Miller
Thank you, Tom.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Jeremy Hamblin of Craig-Hallum. Please go ahead.
Hey, this is Will on for Jeremy. Thanks for taking my questions.
Just first wondering if you could break down the comp cadence by month through the second quarter, and then if you're able to quantify the weather impact you saw from the snowstorms?
Bobby Lavan
The easiest cadence is +1%, +1%, -1%, a little bit better in October, November, and December, but that's the easiest way you should look at it. The hit from the snow in January was about $5 million in revenue.
It really took down Saturday afternoon to Saturday night, we lost at least $2.5 million on Sunday, and we lost about $500 grand on Monday, Tuesday. We were looking at double-digit comp for January until that.
We're still pretty happy with the comp, but we get through. Then snow in December cost us about $2 million.
Okay. Oh, that's helpful.
Then just curious on the EBITDA drag from the water park business in the quarter, and then I know focus has been on organic growth this year, but is there anything in the acquisition pipeline that we should consider for the back half?
Bobby Lavan
We've done $95 million of acquisitions this year. We're always looking at things, but right now we're focused on having a monster summer season in our Boomers and water parks.
Got it. Appreciate the color.
Operator
There are no further questions at this time, and with that, ladies and gentlemen, concludes today's conference call. We thank you for participating.
You may now disconnect your line.