Thank you, Jamie. Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Broadridge's fourth-quarter and fiscal year 2026 earnings call.

Our earnings release and the slides that accompany this call may be found on the Investor Relations section of broadridge.com. Joining me on the call this morning are Tim Gokey, our CEO, and our CFO, Ashima Ghei.

Before I turn the call over to Tim, a few standard reminders. One, we will be making forward-looking statements on today's call regarding Broadridge that involve risks.

A summary of these risks can be found on the second page of the slides, and a more complete description on our annual report on Form 10-K, which will be filed later today. Two, we'll also be referring to several non-GAAP measures, which we believe provide investors with a more complete understanding of Broadridge's underlying operating results.

An explanation of these non-GAAP measures and reconciliations to the comparable GAAP measures can be found in the earnings release and presentation. Let me now turn the call over to Tim Gokey.

Tim?

Thank you, Edings, and good morning. I'm excited to join you this morning to talk about our strong financial results.

I'm even more excited to talk about the progress that we're making building the infrastructure for the financial markets of tomorrow. Markets that will be digitized, agentic, and increasingly tokenized.

Because the real story of fiscal '26 is that Broadridge is delivering today and building for tomorrow. Now turning to the headlines.

First, Broadridge delivered strong financial results. Fiscal year 2026 revenue rose 8% constant currency, adjusted EPS rose 12%, and thanks to a record fourth quarter, closed sales rose to $305 million.

Second, Broadridge is executing across governance, capital markets, and wealth, while building the infrastructure for the markets of tomorrow by driving digital communications, scaling agentic AI, and accelerating tokenized assets. Third, as I just noted, we're building the infrastructure for tokenized securities, and we expect the evolution to tokenized markets will be a significant tailwind for Broadridge.

Fourth, we returned over $1 billion to our shareholders in fiscal '27 in the form of our dividend and a record $600 million in buybacks. Last night, our board approved a 12% increase in our dividend.

We've now raised our annual dividend in each of the 20 years that we've been a public company, underscoring our commitment to creating long-term shareholder value. Fifth and last, as we look ahead to fiscal '27, we expect to drive another year of steady growth while continuing to fund our digital, agentic platform, and tokenization investments.

We're guiding to 6% to 8% recurring revenue growth and 8% to 12% adjusted EPS growth. Let's dig into the execution driving those results, starting on slide 4.

In governance, we're driving the democratization and digitization of investing. Fiscal '26 recurring revenue rose 8%, driven by new sales and double-digit equity position growth.

Market innovation continues to bring in new investors and drive portfolio diversification. Total equity record growth for the year was 16%, powered by the continued popularity of managed accounts.

Equity revenue position growth was 12%. Funds are also benefiting from increased innovation in both passive and active strategies, driving fund position growth of 6%.

For shareholder engagement, 2026 was also a year in which we moved from concept to reality. We completed a successful first proxy season for our AI-powered Custom Policy Engine, which is giving asset managers a modern and independent voting capability and powering proxy votes across more than $800 billion in US AUM.

In fiscal '27, we'll expand the scope of the product to include global equities, and we're re-engineering our ProxyEdge institutional voting workflow to make institutional voting even more intuitive. We're also enabling passive funds to extend governance decisions to their underlying shareholders with our pass-through voting solution, with more than 900 funds and $8 trillion in AUM using our voting choice capability, up from 600 funds and $4 trillion last year.

We're also completing the first full year of our Standing Voting Instructions solutions, or SVI. With a year of proven success improving retail voting participation, we now have six clients on the platform.

As US companies become global bellwethers for innovation, we're seeing growing interest from global investors and global retail platforms in voting capabilities for US equities. The ability to offer proxy voting solutions is seen as a differentiator, especially for new entrants, and that translated into fiscal '26 sales in both Europe and Japan.

Each of these efforts I've discussed this morning extends our core regulatory communications business. By combining our deep voting and engagement expertise, our scaled technology, and agentic AI, we've been able to accelerate our time to market and target new revenue sources.

We're also extending our governance capabilities to tokenized securities, which I'll address shortly. Finally, our print-to-digital strategy is driving digitization.

Digitization rates in our proxy communications are now nearing 95%, with 80% for funds. In customer communications, digital revenues grew more than 10% for the fourth consecutive year.

Our Wealth InFocus solution continues to gain momentum, and we now have six leading US wealth managers either on or in the process of onboarding to the platform. On the topic of digitization, the SEC has issued its much anticipated e-delivery rule proposal, which will allow institutions to shift the default for client communications from physical mail to digital.

We are pleased with the proposal, which is an exciting step forward for investors, public companies, funds, and brokers. As with any regulatory proposal, it will take time to be fully implemented.

Broadridge is well positioned to help our clients through this change, and we expect it to be an important catalyst driving demand for more engaging, digital-first communications like those enabled by our Wealth InFocus platform. Let's move next to capital markets on slide 5.

In capital markets, Broadridge is helping our clients simplify and innovate their trading operations. Fiscal '26 revenues rose 5% to $1.2 billion, driven by growth across both front and back-office solutions.

We closed the acquisition of CQG in early May to strengthen our futures and options capabilities, and it contributed to a nice competitive win with a significant trading institution in the fourth quarter. Our business is benefiting from the ongoing push to extended-hours trading, that's driving demand for our real-time post-trade solutions and our managed services.

We're also tokenizing collateral management. DLR volume rose to $360 billion in June, up 3x from May of '25.

We're currently onboarding multiple Tier 1 banks to our platform, and we expect 50% growth by December, with further scaling as the fiscal year progresses. Last, we're extending our agentic capabilities across our managed services offering.

Our agents analyze real-time data in operational context, identify exceptions, and initiate resolution, driving a step-change function in productivity. In May, we announced the rollout of our Agentic AI Partnership Model, offering up to 30% day-one operational cost reduction with additional savings over time.

That's AI transformation in action. Turning to wealth management, where we're modernizing the industry.

We had another strong year in fiscal '26, with recurring revenue growth of 10%. Thanks to the SIS acquisition, we're seeing new momentum in the Canadian market.

In the spring, we announced the onboarding of Aviso as our latest platform client and recorded another significant win with a leading Canadian bank. We're also accelerating the adoption of digital assets with the launch of our next-generation digital asset capability, which unifies traditional and digital assets within a single operating model.

In the US, we continue to make strong progress in onboarding the wealth platform sales closed last year, while on the component side, we're seeing strong demand for corporate actions and managed services offerings. Across all three franchises, our AI initiatives are delivering results.

Our new AI products, including our Custom Policy voting engine and global demand model in ICS, and our operations solutions, BondGPT and trading algorithms in GTO, are gaining traction. We're also deploying AI to accelerate product and software development and reduce the time and cost to onboard new clients.

Finally, we're beginning to see real AI-driven productivity gains, including $25 million in fiscal '27, and we're just getting started. I'll close my operating review with sales.

After a slow start to the year, we accelerated nicely with a record $158 million of closed sales in Q4. Three things stood out for me.

First, we exceeded the expectations we had at the beginning of the quarter because we were able to drive larger deals to closing. These are the types of engagements that have been slower to move through the pipeline through much of the year.

Second, our focus on closing did not come at the expense of sales origination. Our pipeline at year-end is up significantly from a year ago, highlighting growing demand for our next-generation solutions.

Third, a growing share of our sales is driven by platform and innovation. Our platform-enabled, AI, and next-generation products, including shareholder engagement, DLR, and digital communications, rose 60%, and they accounted for nearly 40% of our closed sales.

Before I sum up, I want to touch on a topic that has come up regularly in our conversations with you: tokenization, on slide 7. Tokenization has the potential to reshape how assets are issued, traded, financed, and serviced.

We expect it to be a significant tailwind for Broadridge. The industry is now grappling with questions about where tokenization will create the most value, how quickly it will scale, and what kind of market infrastructure will be required to support it.

At Broadridge, we're actively shaping the answers to those questions by building trusted, scalable, tokenized market infrastructure across governance, capital markets, and wealth. I'll start with governance, where we're in the early innings of what is likely to be an extended transition to tokenized equities.

Tokenized equities have the potential to power new products and to bring more investors to US markets, driving more positions and new complexity for issuers, brokers, and others as they manage the range of voting and other asset servicing required. There is no one better positioned than Broadridge to solve that complexity at scale for the industry.

At Broadridge, we're actively extending our market-leading proxy voting and disclosure capabilities to support synthetic, custodial, and native tokenized equity models. We are the first provider to support all three models of tokenized equities today.

The leading model today is synthetic, focused on non-US investors. We were pleased to announce a relationship with Ondo, the leading issuer of synthetic tokenized US equities and ETFs, to provide a market-leading solution to enable holders of synthetic tokens to exercise governance.

We expect further announcements in coming months. Longer-term, we expect third-party custodial approaches to gain significant traction.

We recently extended our relationship with Ondo to provide governance solutions for the custodial model they intend to launch in the US. We also signed an agreement with Alpaca, a leading provider of custody, clearing, and other infrastructure services supporting tokenized assets, to provide a full suite of governance and shareholder communications services to clients on their network.

For native issuance, we've completed the first and only on-chain voting for tokenized equities with Galxe, and now integrating that capability into our Shareholder InSite voting solution, giving corporate issuers a single voting platform covering tokenized, registered, and beneficial shares. We serve 80% of the Fortune 500 today for their registered shares, if native issuance becomes a significant model, we expect it will be a positive for Broadridge.

Turning now to capital markets. We have long believed that one of the biggest near-term payoffs of tokenization is enhanced collateral mobility.

We've been working to address that opportunity for the past eight years. Today, our distributed ledger repo platform, DLR, processes $360 billion in tokenized repo transactions every day, as I mentioned, with nearly 20 institutions on the platform or in the process of onboarding.

Now we're taking DLR global, with G7 securities entering the network to support cross-border repo activity and seamless collateral movements. DLR gives institutions a practical way to improve funding flexibility, optimize collateral and liquidity, and make efficient use of capital across global markets, all while operating within familiar institutional workflows.

Building on DLR, we're launching DLX, our end-to-end multi-asset tokenization and digital asset platform to support always-on markets. DLX extends Broadridge's tokenization capabilities across multiple asset classes, combining tokenization, smart contracts, transaction orchestration, trading, settlement, and governance on a single platform for equities, funds, alternatives, and money market instruments.

Institutions will be able to operate with one set of tokenization rails, one governance standard, and one operational model across the entire tokenized asset portfolio. Given the extended transition I described earlier, many clients are concerned about the cost of a separate infrastructure for digital and tokenized assets.

That's why our recent digital asset survey showed that 69% of firms expect a hybrid infrastructure. Broadridge is stepping in to build that infrastructure at scale.

We're extending Broadridge's market-leading multi-asset capabilities to support the trading and servicing of digital and tokenized assets across our full front-to-back infrastructure, from order execution to books and records, offering clients the ability to support traditional, digital, and tokenized assets on the same integrated platform. We will leverage many of the same components for wealth managers to deliver a full front and back-office solution integrating tokenized and traditional assets.

By linking digital asset capabilities to existing infrastructure, we're helping them move faster and unlock new opportunities in digital assets, alternatives, private assets, tokenized money market funds, and equities. We announced the expansion of our digital asset capabilities to the Canadian wealth market this past April, and we expect to go live by the end of the calendar year, subject to our clients' regulatory approvals.

We're pleased to announce that we're extending these capabilities to serve our US wealth clients as well. Our unified platform will enable broker-dealers, registered investment advisors, and wealth managers to offer cryptocurrencies and tokenized assets alongside traditional investments across both advisor-led and self-directed experiences.

At the end of the day, the future of tokenization is going to be about building tokenized markets. Markets that institutions, regulators, issuers, intermediaries, and most importantly, investors, can trust.

That means building not only the technology, but also the servicing model, market infrastructure, governance, and controls needed to support adoption at scale. It means bringing together new entrants, incumbents, and infrastructure providers to shape a market that's efficient, resilient, and credible from the start.

That's a generational opportunity for Broadridge across our franchises, and we're seizing it. As I close, I want to come back to what I said at the beginning.

Broadridge is delivering strong financial performance today while building for tomorrow. We have never been a stronger company.

We have deep client relationships with the leading financial institutions, and we're now extending to new entrants. We have unmatched subject-matter expertise, and we have the integrated technology platform to bring it all together.

There is no one better positioned to build the next-generation infrastructure that will power the markets of tomorrow. Before I turn it over to Ashima, I want to address the nearly 16,000 Broadridge associates around the world, many of whom are listening to this call.

You are the ones driving that execution. You're the ones creating that innovation, and you're the ones shaping the future.

Your work is truly making a difference. Thank you.

Ashima?

Thanks, Tim. Good morning.

It's great to be here today. Before I begin my review of our strong fiscal '26 results and fiscal '27 guidance, I want to make four key callouts.

First, the Broadridge business model is working. During fiscal '26, we delivered high single-digit recurring revenue growth and another year of double-digit adjusted EPS growth while funding investments in digitization, agentic AI, and tokenization.

Second, free cash flow and capital returns. Broadridge generated $1.2 billion in free cash flow, equal to 110% of our adjusted earnings.

Between share repurchases and our dividend, we returned just under $9 per share to shareholders during the year. Third, we delivered on our three-year recurring revenue and adjusted EPS objectives for the fifth consecutive cycle.

Finally, our fiscal '27 guidance calls for another year of strong recurring revenue and adjusted EPS growth while funding investment. There are two keys to that forecast: one, our $470 million recurring revenue backlog, which gives us great visibility into our growth; and second, $25 million in expected AI cost savings in fiscal '27, which reflects growing confidence in our ability to generate real AI productivity gains.

With that, let's go to the numbers on slide 8. I'll start with the full-year results.

Fiscal '26 recurring revenues grew 8% on a constant currency basis to $4.9 billion, driven by organic growth of 6%. Adjusted operating income margin rose slightly to 20.5%, overcoming a 40 basis points headwind from lower interest rates and higher postage.

Adjusted EPS grew 12% to $9.60, and closed sales were $305 million. Then turning to the fourth quarter, recurring revenue constant currency grew 8% to $1.5 billion, including 7% organic growth.

Adjusted EPS rose 8% to $3.82, and we delivered a record $158 million in closed sales. Let's move to slide 9 to discuss our segment recurring revenue.

ICS recurring revenues rose 8% for the year, including 10% growth in the fourth quarter, led by strong growth in regulatory revenues. Regulatory revenues rose 12% in fiscal '26 and 14% in Q4, driven largely by strong position growth across both equities and funds.

In addition to underlying position growth, we are benefiting from strong global volumes and from a small but growing contribution from the new shareholder engagement products we have brought to market. Data-driven fund solutions revenue rose 4% in fiscal '26 and 7% in Q4.

Fourth-quarter growth was driven by a combination of solid organic growth and the acquisitions of Aquiline and iJoin. Lower interest rates were a 2-point headwind to organic growth.

Issuer revenues rose 8% for the year and 8% for the quarter, closing out a strong year. Fourth-quarter growth was balanced across our shareholder engagement and disclosure solutions, and more than offset a 1-point headwind from lower rates.

Finally, customer communications revenues grew 5% for the year, including 14% for digital, and 1% for the quarter. Fourth-quarter growth was driven by a 2-point contribution from the Signal acquisition, which offset lower print volumes.

Looking ahead to fiscal '27, we expect another year of strong and consistent growth in ICS, in line with our overall recurring revenue guidance and led by continued growth in regulatory revenues. Before I turn to GTO results, a quick note on the potential financial impact of the SEC's e-delivery rule proposal.

First, given the expected implementation timelines, we expect no impact on fiscal '27. Second, looking beyond fiscal '27, we expect the biggest impact will be a reduction in pass-through distribution revenues, which will have a positive impact on our reported adjusted operating income margin.

Third, we anticipate a modest headwind to recurring revenue growth over a two to three-year period as clients implement the rule change, which we expect to largely offset with new solutions. Net-net, we are not anticipating that it will have a significant impact on our adjusted earnings growth going forward.

Last, I would just emphasize again, this is all preliminary, and we should know more when the final rule is released in the months ahead. Turning to GTO on slide 10.

GTO revenues grew 7% for the full year and 5% in Q4. Capital markets revenues grew 5% for the year and 7% for the quarter.

Fourth-quarter organic growth was driven by a combination of new sales and higher equity trading volumes. The acquisition of CQG contributed 3 points.

Total digital asset revenues, including coin revenues related to our Canton super-validator role and DLR revenues, contributed 1 point to fourth-quarter growth. Now to wealth.

Wealth and investment management revenues grew 10% for the full year and 1% in the fourth quarter. Excluding the headwind from lower term licenses, revenues grew 5% in Q4, with growth being driven by a combination of revenue from sales and strength in retail trading volumes.

Looking ahead to fiscal '27, we expect GTO revenue growth at the higher end of our recurring revenue guidance, with higher growth in capital markets driven in part by the acquisition of CQG. Now let's move to slide 11 to review our key volume indicators.

Broadridge continues to benefit from strong growth in investor participation across both equities and funds. Fourth-quarter equity position growth was 17%, including 14% growth in revenue-generating positions.

Fund position growth was 7%. Looking ahead to the first half of fiscal '27, our position testing indicates continued strong position growth, which we expect to translate into high single-digit equity revenue position growth and mid single-digit fund growth.

In GTO, trade volumes rose 15% for the quarter, with double-digit growth in equity volumes and mid single-digit growth in fixed income volumes. I'll wrap up my discussion of recurring revenue growth on slide 12.

For the quarter, recurring revenue growth constant currency was 8%, primarily driven by 7 points of organic growth. Our retention rates remained 98% for the quarter and for the full year, and acquisitions contributed 1 point to growth.

Moving to slide 13, total revenue in Q4 increased 7% to $2.2 billion, driven by 6 points of growth from recurring revenue. Event-driven revenue of $71 million was a modest headwind to fourth-quarter growth, largely driven by lower levels of mutual fund proxy activity.

Low to no-margin distribution revenues grew 8%, contributing 2 points to total revenue growth. Turning now to margins on slide 14.

Fourth-quarter adjusted operating income margin was 26.9%, down 10 basis points from fourth quarter '25, as operating leverage from our scaled business was offset by the timing of growth investments. On a full-year basis, adjusted operating income margin rose slightly to 20.5%, as the combination of strong recurring revenue, record event revenue, and strong operating leverage enabled Broadridge to increase investments in key growth initiatives.

For the year, the combination of lower float income tied to interest rates and the increase in pass-through distribution revenue was a 40 basis points headwind to margin. I'm also pleased to see increased increasing traction in our AI productivity efforts, and we expect that to continue.

Our fiscal '27 forecast includes $25 million in AI-driven productivity gains, primarily in our technology organization, which we expect to use to fund investments and deliver earnings growth. Let's move on to sales.

Broadridge reported full-year closed sales of $305 million, including $158 million in closed sales in Q4. Our sales results lifted our closed sales backlog to $470 million, up $40 million from a year ago.

At 10% of fiscal '26 recurring revenue, this provides strong visibility into the largest drivers of our expected growth in fiscal '27 and '28. Turning to cash flows, Broadridge generated free cash flow of $1.2 billion in fiscal '26, up 17%, driven by a combination of higher earnings and working capital gains.

Free cash flow conversion was 110%. Turning next to capital allocation on slide 17.

With the decline in Broadridge's share price, we believe Broadridge shares represent a compelling value. We repurchased a record $600 million in fiscal '26, including $250 million in the fourth quarter.

In addition, we deployed $443 million for our dividend. Taken together, Broadridge returned just under $9 a share to shareholders in fiscal '26 via dividends and buybacks.

We also invested $113 million in capital spending and software, with an additional $46 million to onboard clients onto our platforms for the year. We closed four acquisitions for $283 million, including CQG, which closed in May.

Beyond M&A, we invested $57 million across a number of strategic, early-stage companies, primarily AI-native and tokenization ventures focused on financial services, which give us a front-row seat into how others are driving innovation. Rounding out capital items with digital assets, as of June 30th, we hold $265 million in digital assets, including $216 million in coins and $49 million in digital asset treasury-related investments.

During fiscal '26, we recognized a $227 million gain on these holdings, which has been adjusted out of our non-GAAP earnings. Last night, our board approved a 12% increase in our annual dividend amount to $4.36 per share.

I would note that this increase marks the 14th double-digit increase in the last 15 years. Additionally, our board also increased our share repurchase authorization to $1.5 billion.

Our leverage ratio at June 30th was 1.9x, comfortably below our target of 2.5x, positioning us to continue to actively repurchase shares while still having capacity for select strategic M&A. I will close my prepared remarks on slide 18 with some detail on our guidance, starting with revenue.

We expect recurring revenue growth constant currency of 6% to 8%, with balanced growth across both ICS and GTO. We expect organic growth to be driven by new sales as we onboard our $470 million backlog.

Our fiscal '26 acquisitions are expected to contribute 1 point to growth. Following a record fiscal '26, we expect event-driven revenues to moderate to the range of $250 to $300 million.

Distribution revenues are forecast to grow at mid single-digit range, driven by higher postage rates. We expect these low to no-margin revenues to have a dilutive impact on the reported margins.

Now let's move to margin. We expect adjusted operating income margin of approximately 21%, up from 20.5% in fiscal '26.

The combination of operating leverage and AI-driven productivity gains should enable us to fund ongoing investments, offset lower event-driven revenues, and drive another year of strong adjusted EPS growth. Next, EPS.

We expect adjusted EPS growth of 8% to 12%. Embedded in this outlook is an expected tax rate of 22%.

Finally, we expect closed sales of $290 to $330 million. Last, as always, our guidance excludes the impact of any unannounced acquisitions.

Looking ahead to the first quarter, I have three callouts. One, I want to remind you that we will lap a first-quarter record $114 million of event-driven revenues last year, well ahead of the quarter average quarterly average of $60 to $70 million.

Second, we expect a 4-point license tailwind in our GTO business across both capital markets and wealth management. Net-net, we expect first-quarter adjusted EPS to account for approximately 11% to 13% of our full-year earnings.

I'll close there. The Broadridge financial model is working.

We are coming off a strong year, we're well positioned to deliver another, and we're investing in agentic AI, tokenization, and digitization to position Broadridge to be the transformation partner for the industry. With that, let's move to Q&A.

Thanks. Good morning, everyone, and it's great to see the results today.

Tim, I wanted to just revisit the closed sales number. I know it can be lumpy quarter-to-quarter.

It was particularly strong this quarter. You had a couple of callouts.

I was hoping maybe you could go a little deeper into some of those, especially the idea that you were able to get these larger deals closed. Why was it difficult last quarter, why you got it done this quarter, and then maybe if you could just also highlight the significance of the pipeline as we think about building into next year?

Thank you.

Dan, thank you very much. I have to say we really feel good about how we closed the year and with the new record.

I'll come to the timing, but I do want to just re-comment on the fact that we saw the growth in the areas where we're investing, and that set of innovation products that I talked about, including the platform products, grew over 50% and accounted, as I said in my remarks, for almost 40% of closed sales for the year, which is really exciting. There were two drivers in terms of our good results.

One is the one you mentioned, which is some of the larger deals that we discussed on our last call, and there's a very significant communications deal was part of that, there were some post-trade deals, and the timing of those are just very unpredictable. I think near the end of the third quarter, as there's a lot of uncertainty in market, and the sort of pace of client conversations, we were just really feeling it was just uncertain as to how people would work through on the client side, the business cases, and the complex legal work that these large deals require.

We just didn't have the confidence. What we saw during the fourth quarter is a lot of that freed up.

I think people were looking forward more, looking at the investments that they need to make on their side to drive their business, and so we saw acceleration and we're really pleased with that. Mind you, those were things we originally thought were going to happen during the year, but we just had that period of uncertainty.

Now there is a broader point, though, which is there was a faster flow-through of many mid-sized deals as well. It wasn't just the very large ones.

Across the board, we saw better flow-through. I think this reinforces getting to your question about the pipeline, what we did say in the last call is we thought the issue was timing, not demand, and I think that that is true.

We saw strong deal origination, and healthy renewals, by the way, but we saw strong deal origination throughout the year. We really like the momentum we have going into fiscal '27.

If you look at our pipeline right now compared to what it was a year ago, it's up by more than a third. We think that we're going to continue to benefit from the investments that we're making.

We did do some tuck-in acquisitions this year, so that's going to help also. We think it positions us well to do another year of $300-plus million sales next year.

Hey, good morning. I was hoping you could provide a little bit more detail on the 6% internal growth within ICS this quarter.

Were there tailwinds besides the equity revenue position count growth that you called out? No.

We were quite pleased, Patrick, with the ICS growth. ICS continues to perform well, right?

On the organic side, we benefited from a healthy mix of closed sales, strong record growth, and this was in spite of a 40 basis points headwind from interest rates. Overall, quite pleased with the performance.

We're doing well across all dimensions, nothing specific to call out here.

Thank you. Then, I appreciate your comments on the SEC's proposal for electronic default for proxies.

Curious about your thoughts on whether that impacts Broadridge's competitive moat in a world where communications are primarily electronic?

Patrick, I will take that. I just have to sort of readvertise the fact that we think at the end of the day electronic delivery is an opportunity to better engage investors at lower cost and that we think the SEC's proposal is an exciting step forward for all the different stakeholders.

As we're a leader in e-delivery and our communications are highly digital today. In terms of the competitive dynamic, we think this really strengthens things because when you look at a next-generation digital experience, to not just send someone a dead PDF, which will be really a second-tier kind of experience in the future, the platform that we've invested in around our InFocus platform and then particularly Wealth InFocus is truly groundbreaking.

It allows composition through one workstream into both the digital side and the print side. Remember, I know you know this, but you're asking the question on behalf of others, which is that even in a world where there's electronic default, there is still going to be print.

There are people that don't have addresses, there are people that are changing, and so there's always going to be that residual amount, and so you're always going to have to have the dual capability. Being able to offer that dual capability seamlessly, not having two different composition engines, not having two different teams doing that, that's going to be a unique value proposition that we have.

We're excited about the future. As because you're well familiar with it, we've been working on this for more than a decade in terms of being ready.

We really look forward to helping our clients through this transition period. If they are actively rethinking what their whole client experience is going to look like, and we're in a perfect position to help them with that.

Great,

appreciate the comments. Thank you.

Hi, guys, it's Michael Infante for James. Thanks for taking our question.

I just wanted to ask on some of the new wins you had with the likes of Ondo and Alpaca and Galxe on the tokenized security side, how should we be thinking about the unit economics and how that might evolve? Is that incremental to your existing per-position proxy economics or more of a re-rate of the same positions?

Thank you for asking the question to clarify. We're using the same rate schedule.

If it's a natively issued, it would be the registered rate schedule, which is higher than the beneficial schedule. If it's a beneficial holding, which we think when we get to the custody side, it will be under the beneficial schedule.

If it's synthetic, then it's very similar to what we're doing today with pass-through voting for the large asset managers. Very, very, very, very similar.

I just want to re-emphasize that we think that change is good for Broadridge because it introduces complexity for clients. There's no one that's better positioned than we are to help them solve it.

When we think about those conversations you just talked about in governance, the most active players are telling us that they believe this is really important to provide, but they don't know how to do it. They don't want to make the investments or bear the fixed costs, and that's why we're signing up all the leading players to leverage our infrastructure, our regulatory knowledge, our multichannel ability to communicate with investors.

We are seeing the earliest pool of demand is coming from global investors, to a lesser extent from crypto-native investors, and so we think that's going to drive position growth. Then longer-term, these products will evolve to take care of the unique characteristics that tokenized securities can provide, and we think that's going to create even more demand to solve the complexity of managing governance for our clients.

We're excited about it.

That's good context, Tim. Maybe just a follow-up on the buyback reauthorization, how you guys are thinking about tuck-in M&A.

Billion and a half repurchase authorization, you're obviously enacted $600 million of buybacks in '26 with fiscal 4Q being a high-water mark. If we just sort of step back and look at where the stock is trading on a P/E basis over the last decade, right, how should we be thinking about your level of aggressiveness on the buyback from here, and sort of how you're thinking about that relative IRR tradeoff between tuck-in M&A?

Thanks.

Absolutely. As you know from following us for a long time, we have a long history of balanced capital allocation of which we're not changing.

It starts with investment-grade credit rating, making internal investments to drive organic growth, which you're certainly seeing us do, paying a dividend, we just raised it 12%, and pursuing attractive M&A, and then typically having buybacks sort of as the residual from that. Then, as at current levels, we believe that our shares are a compelling value.

We have focused our capital allocation on share repurchases in the second half of fiscal '26. As we look ahead to '27, we continue to see our shares as a strong value.

I would anticipate continued healthy levels of share repurchases. Then all that said, we do continue to have very attractive tuck-in opportunities.

If the right property presents itself, we have the cash flow and the leverage to do both. Remember, we're only at 1.9 leverage right now.

I think the $1.5 billion is pretty much in line with previous authorizations we've done. It gives us plenty of capacity.

I think I would look for us to be doing both, heavier on share repurchases than we have in the past, but also leaving the option open for unique opportunities that if we were a shareholder, we would want Broadridge to take advantage of.

Thank you, Tim.

Great. Good morning, and thank you for taking the questions.

Want to start off on closed sales. Obviously, good to see you guys really close the year strong there, particularly on the outlook, though, I guess, at the midpoint, it's up around 2% for the coming year.

I guess how should we think about some of the factors, either whether it's some large deals or such that would maybe steer you guys towards the high or the low end of the outlook for fiscal '27?

Kyle, well, thank you very much. It's a good question.

When we look at our pipeline and see that it's up very significantly from where we were last year, then that would have us feel strong confidence about the range that we put out. I think, at the same time, it's been hard to predict the past couple of years, and so we don't want to be in a position where we're just not highly confident of what we're putting out.

We're very confident in another year of $300-plus million. Again, it'll be the third time I said it, but we really like the fact that the things that are growing are the things where we've been making investments and we're really seeing in particular a platform we've talked about that's the technology platform that we're putting in place with a common data ontology and how that is really beginning to power our sales.

If you look at our pipeline, half of it now is things that are platform-enabled. We think that also really lays a nice groundwork for AI and for agentic AI in the future, because we all know that data is the driver, and being able to pull all that data together in a common architecture is going to really enable our clients, whether it's using our AI or their AI, to drive agentic on top of that.

We're excited.

Great. That's really helpful.

Then wanted to switch over to tokenization, the DLR platform in particular. Good to see the updates.

Seems like the volumes have really been picking up steam. You guys have intraday trading now live, I guess how should we think about the continued growth?

Obviously, the comps are getting tougher, but it seems like the capabilities are growing, and you could potentially get some network effect benefits. I guess how are you guys thinking about contribution and kind of specific areas or products or such as intraday trading that you're most excited about for the upcoming year with DLR?

Kyle, great question. When you think about it, we have multiple vectors of growth.

One vector is just we've already signed a number of very significant clients that are in the process of onboarding. Just within the current value proposition, you are going to see significant continued growth.

I talked about in the script, 50% by the end of the year and further scaling after that. That's just within the core of what we're doing now.

Then we are really building out into intraday, as I mentioned, which as more and more people take that on, could be a really nice volume driver. I continue to believe that that could be a really interesting thing for the industry as this moves from sort of something that's in the treasury to finance the firm, to a desk level to finance trades, and really could create some unique things there.

That remains a little bit of an option value in terms of if that really scales, but I particularly think that's a great value proposition. Then two other vectors of growth.

One is going global, we are in conversations multiple countries and exchanges to really bring G7 securities into the network, and we think that is a really nice growth vector. Then the other sort of vector of opportunity is what we've talked about with DLX, which is really taking DLR and extending the capabilities into other asset classes: equities, funds, alternatives, money markets.

That's going to be live by the end of the year, and so that will create a much broader capability. This whole area around collateral and optimizing collateral, we think, is really fruitful for capital markets firms and is going to be a really nice growth driver.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the question.

A lot of information on this call. Just a point of clarification, in the first quarter, Ashima, you mentioned 400 basis points from rev rec of a license.

Just to be clear, were you referencing a tough comp with first quarter of fiscal 2026, or is this a benefit to '27, and then just to be clear, is this a renewal or is this new business?

Thanks for the question, Peter. It's a benefit in fiscal '27, and it's a renewal.

We'll just see about a 4-point tailwind in Q1 across the compare that we had last year, and it's split across capital markets and wealth.

Great. Then anything else from an event-driven standpoint, the first quarter was definitely the toughest comp, but second quarter is also a little bit difficult, back half looked pretty close to the average.

Any other difficult or easy compares you'd call out on the license side within GTO to think about during fiscal 2027?

One, you're right on event, right? I called out the Q1 impact specifically.

Q2 is a good reminder, Peter, I'm glad you have that on your radar. Second, license revenue for the full year is not a big driver, it's really the Q1 compare that would be a big driver for you.

Third, don't forget the impact of the acquisitions that we did this year. For ICS, you'll see the M&A growth start to tail off after the second quarter, because we did most of the acquisitions in the first half of the year.

CQG, however, since it started in Q4, you're going to see the impact all through the year. That'll impact some of the total revenue growth as well.

That's a good callout. I appreciate it.

I'll get back in the queue.

Morning, guys. Thank you for taking my questions.

Just on the DLX platform, wondering would that replace the DLR in certain instances, since it's sort of an expansion into multi-asset class, or would it be kind of built on top or integrated? Just any color on that would be appreciated.

Scott, thank you very much. Great clarification.

When we built DLR in the first place, we always had the idea that it would be a multi-asset class platform. It really is built on DLR, and there's been no sort of re-architecting involved.

Our clients are not going to need to go through a conversion or things like that. It's really opening up the capabilities that are latent in the DLR platform with the connectivity to these other asset classes.

Great question, and really it's not that it's a new platform build, it's opening up new applications and getting clients onboard that are going to be using those applications.

That's helpful. Then, Ashima, just going back to the 4-point license tailwind in 1Q, just wondering if you can help us understand how that would be spread across capital markets and wealth.

Is it a skew towards one or the other, or is it pretty even?

Call it split evenly between the two.

Thank you.

Thanks for taking my question and strong results today. Let me ask about AI.

You talked about $25 million in AI-driven productivity savings that you expect this year. Will these savings ultimately be passed on to clients, or asking it other way, how should we think about AI-driven solutions becoming a moat and being part of clients' decision-making as they decide to outsource or do it themselves?

Yeah -- Oh, sorry. Look, Puneet, I'm glad you asked the question because AI is such a great topic.

As we think about this going forward, we're seeing sort of three buckets. We're seeing a bucket around new products, we're seeing a bucket around sort of speed to market, and a bucket around greater efficiency.

Then more broadly, we're seeing an opportunity to position Broadridge as the agentic operating system for our clients. Specifically on the savings side, we are seeing real savings as we move through fiscal '26.

We have really, I think, already achieved the things that we're going to do that will drive the $25 million. Right now, because upping our investment in '27, we're reinvesting most of that in moving our roadmap ahead.

That roadmap is moving nicely, going to the speed factor and how we're able to accelerate our product development and, by the way, client onboarding. Then to your point about how AI will be part of the buying decision in the future, I think there's sort of two pieces within that.

There are going to be unique AI products that clients will take on or not take on based on their own characteristics, like Custom Policy Engine, like the global demand model, like OpsGPT. We have a number of those already in market.

Then there's this broader question about what I'm going to call the agentic operating system in terms of having the right AI embedded in your product to drive demand. Then you'd see the demand play in really as sales of your core products.

Just, you know this well, but we serve 22 of the 26 primary dealers and 20 in fixed income, we serve seven of the top 10 in equities. What I just mentioned on a previous question, we've invested the past five years in the common data ontology and platform, and that positions us perfectly to enable our clients to leverage that platform either with our AI or their AI.

We think that is going to be actually an increasing point of differentiation. Really liked the question.

Thank you. Then,

last year in fiscal '26, you had a very strong position growth in the regulatory business, which also drove your higher internal growth. How should we think about growth drivers this year as you expect positions growth to normalize?

I think you said high single digit in the first half of the year.

I think your question, Puneet, is broader about revenue growth, right,

and

how we expect the revenue growth guidance to come through? Yes.

I'll tell you from a recurring revenue standpoint, we're expecting another strong year of growth in fiscal '27, frankly, very much in line with fiscal '26. Like you said, last year we had organic growth of 6%, our guidance is calling for another 5% to 7% organic growth, with the additional point from acquisitions.

We are seeing continued strong position growth, right, that's one of the core drivers. Our early testing is indicating high single-digit equity revenue position growth, mid single-digit fund position growth.

In addition to that, we're continuing to see contribution from revenue from sales, which has been one of the strengths of our business model, right, and the backlog that we have with $470 million is going to set us up well for the next couple of years as we convert some of that backlog into revenues. Frankly, I feel pretty good about the internal growth given the visibility that we have not just in position growth, but our overall revenue from sales contribution as well.

Got it. It's a higher contribution from backlog-driven revenue this year.

As well as internal from continued position growth, yep.

Thank you, operator. Thanks to everyone for joining our call today.

We are pleased to have delivered another strong year in fiscal '26. As I think you heard, we're excited about the path ahead as we execute on our strategy across our three franchises and on building the infrastructure for the financial markets of tomorrow.

Thank you for your interest in Broadridge, and we look forward to reporting our next set of results to you later this fall.