Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for today's 2025 fourth quarter and full-year earnings call. I'm Christina Kmetko, and I'm responsible for Investor Relations at NACCO.

I'm joined today by NACCO's President and CEO, J.C. Butler, and Senior Vice President and Controller, Elizabeth Loveman.

Yesterday evening, we announced our fourth quarter and full-year results and filed our 10-K with the SEC. Both documents are on our website for your reference.

We'll refer today to several non-GAAP metrics to give you a clearer picture of how we think about our business. Reconciliations to GAAP can also be found on our website.

Before beginning our discussion, let me remind you that today's remarks will include forward-looking statements. As always, actual outcomes may differ materially due to various risks and uncertainties, which are described in our earnings release, 10-K, and other filings.

We undertake no obligation to update these statements. With those quick notes out of the way, I'll turn the call over to J.C.

for his opening remarks. J.C.?

Thanks, Christie, and good morning, everyone. Before I begin, I'd like to take a moment to discuss an incident that happened at one of our Florida operations.

The safety and well-being of our employees has always been a cornerstone of our company's values. Despite this focus, a tragic incident in December resulted in the loss of two employees.

This loss deeply affected us, and we extend our heartfelt condolences to the family, friends, and colleagues of these two individuals. This is a solemn reminder of the importance we place on protecting the well-being of our people every day.

In the aftermath of this tragedy, we are actively reinforcing our safety expectations across the organization. Our employees are the nucleus of our success, and their safety will always come before all all else.

I'll now discuss our operating performance. We delivered a strong close to 2025.

Our fourth quarter operating profit rose 95% over last year and almost 12% sequentially. All three of our reportable segments reported improved year-over-year results, led by a significant increase in the Utility Coal Mining segment.

Overall, we continue to build upon the improving profitability and growth we experienced in the third quarter, highlighting a second half that overcame operational challenges experienced during the first half of the year. We disclosed over the past several quarters that we were terminating our pension plan during the fourth quarter, and I'm happy to report that we have now successfully settled all future pension obligations.

As a result of completing this process, we recognized an after-tax termination charge of $6 million. This charge and an increase in tax expense, which Liz will explain in more detail, contributed to our reported fourth quarter net loss of $3.8 million.

These transactional anomalies aside, I feel good about our underlying operating results, which contributed to the 59% year-over-year and 14% sequential increases in adjusted EBITDA. I believe these results represent a business delivering on its potential.

Our Utility Coal Mining segment, which features long-term mining contracts, remains the foundation of our business. I'm pleased to say that our Utility Coal Mining segment reported a gross profit this quarter after a number of quarters of losses.

For more than a year, I've discussed Mississippi Lignite's unfavorable contract mechanics that resulted in a lower per-ton sales price that unfavorably affected results. The team at Mississippi Lignite Mining Company has worked diligently to mine efficiently and control costs, and this quarter, the mine produced and sold more tons and as a result, benefited from higher production efficiency and a lower cost per ton sold.

Production also outpaced deliveries in the period, leading to certain production costs to be capitalized into inventory. These factors drove the current gross quarter gross the current quarter gross profit compared with the prior year loss, when results were affected by a significant inventory write-down.

I'd like to be able to say the results at Mississippi Lignite Mining Company are moving in the right direction now, especially with an anticipated increase in the contractually determined price per ton. However, the customer's power plant began a maintenance outage in mid-February, which is affecting first quarter demand.

The power plant is expected to resume operations in mid-March. We are expecting year-over-year improvements at Mississippi Lignite Mining Company in 2026, but any delay or further changes in demand or dispatch or any reduced power plant mechanical availability could alter our expectations.

Our Contract Mining segment continues to benefit from ongoing progress on operational and strategic initiatives designed to enhance profitability. Improved margins, driven largely by contracts executed in recent years and other growth initiatives, led to an increase in the segment's year-over-year operating performance.

This segment remains our growth platform for mining. Through continued geographic and mineral expansion, we are building a growing portfolio of long-term contracts that strengthen the foundation for sustained profitability.

As I mentioned during our Q3 earnings call, we secured a multi-year dragline services contract of part as part of a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dam construction project in Palm Beach County, Florida.

This part project is already starting to ramp up. We're excited about this opportunity, as it advances our growth into large-scale infrastructure projects.

This project also provides an opportunity to showcase the efficiency and environmental advantages of the new electric-drive M-Tech draglines. We also anticipate commencing operations in a new limestone quarry in Arizona in 2026.

Turning to minerals and royalties, this segment grew year-over-year. Royalties from our legacy natural gas assets benefited from higher prices and production, more than offsetting the impact of lower oil prices and production.

The Catapult team continues to actively pursue additional investment opportunities to support future growth in earnings. At Mitigation Resources, we expect increasing profitability over time from the sale of mitigation credits, and as reclamation and restoration services expand.

While performance is currently variable due to permit and project timing, Mitigation Resources is expected to generate a profit in the second half of 2026 and move toward more consistent results over time as the business expands. We continue to invest in our businesses to drive future growth.

Again in 2026, we anticipate making significal significant capital investments. The majority of these planned expenditures relate to business development opportunities, and we will only make those investments if the projects meet our strict investment criteria.

Overall, I continue to believe we are well positioned for meaningful growth. We are entering 2026 with clear opportunities to build on our 2025 2025 momentum as we execute our growth strategies and create long-term value for our shareholders.

Our approach is rooted in long-term contracts and investments, which continue to deliver strong earnings and steady cash flow for compounding annuity-like returns. We executed on this strategy over the past decade, and momentum continues to build.

I remain confident in our businesses and in our in our ability to deliver strong 2026 results and continued progress in the years to come. Before I turn the call over to Liz, I'd like to say thank you to all of our employees.

Our team delivered strong 2025 fourth quarter and full-year earnings, and their hard work and commitment will enable us to continue to deliver in the future. We have an incredibly strong team across the company, and I am proud of the work that they do.

With that, I'll turn the call over to Liz to provide a more detailed view of our financial results and outlook. Liz?

Thank you, J.C. I'll start with some high-level comments about our consolidated fourth quarter financial results compared to 2024.

In the 2025 fourth quarter, we generated consolidated gross profit of $12 million, an increase of 42% year-over-year, while our fourth quarter revenues of $66.8 million increased 5%. We reported consolidated operating profit of $7.6 million, up from $3.9 million in 2024, driven by improvements at all three of our reportable segments.

These favorable results were partially offset by higher unallocated expenses. Consolidated adjusted EBITDA increased 59% to $14.3 million versus $9 million for the same period last year.

As J.C. discussed, we completed the termination of our pension plan and as a result, recorded a $7.8 million non-cash pension settlement charge, or $6 million after tax.

This charge, combined with the fourth quarter true-up of tax expense to the full-year effective tax rate, resulted in a net loss for the quarter of $3.8 million, or 52 cents per share. This compared to net income of $7.6 million, or $1.02 per share in 2024.

Moving to the individual segments. The Utility Coal Mining segment reported operating profit of $7.2 million in 2025, a significant increase over the $2 million generated in the 2024 fourth quarter.

Segment adjusted EBITDA increased to $9.7 million from $4.2 million in the prior year. These year-over-year improvements were driven by the stronger operating performance at Mississippi Lignite Mining Company that J.C.

discussed. Lower general and administrative employee-related expenses also contributed to the higher segment operating profit.

Looking ahead, we expect an increase in operating profit in 2026 compared with 2025. Improvements at Mississippi Lignite Mining Company as a result of an increase in the contractually determined per-ton sales price are expected to be partly offset by lower earnings at the unconsolidated mining operations.

The lower unconsolidated mining earnings are due to reduced income at the Sabine Mining Company associated with the wind-down of reclamation services. In the Contract Mining segment, revenues, net of reimbursed costs, grew 9% over the prior year, primarily driven by higher part sales, partly offset by increased volumes of lower-price tons.

Operating profit of $900,000 and segment adjusted EBITDA of $3.3 million were comparable to the prior year. Improved margins at the mining operations and an increase in part sales were offset by a $1.1 million loss contingency and lower employee-related expenses.

The loss contingency is related to costs associated with the incident J.C. discussed previously.

Looking forward, higher customer demand, earnings contributions from new contracts, and continued momentum from 2025 activities are expected to lead to a significant year-over-year increase in results in 2026. The Minerals and Royalty segment delivered year-over-year growth in revenues, operating profit, and segment adjusted EBITDA due to increased royalty revenues driven by improved natural gas pricing and increased production volumes.

These benefits were partly offset by lower royalty oil revenues resulting from reduced oil prices and volumes. Lower employee-related expenses and a higher earnings from an equity investment also contributed to the year-over-year profit improvement.

At the Minerals and Royalty segment, new investments are expected to contribute favorably to 2026 results. However, commodity price forecasts, as well as development and production assumptions, are expected to result in an overall year-over-year decrease in operating profit and segment adjusted EBITDA, particularly in the second half of the year.

It is important to note that our forecast was developed prior to the recent developments in the Middle East, and any significant changes in commodity prices or production as a result of this conflict could change our expectations for 2026. Overall, we anticipate meaningful year-over-year improvements in consolidated operating profit, net income, and EBITDA in 2026.

Turning to our liquidity, for the 2025 full year, we generated cash from operations of $50.9 million, compared to $22.3 million in 2024. At December 31st, we had outstanding debt of $100.9 million, up modestly from $99.5 million at December 31st, 2024.

Our total liquidity was $124.2 million, which consisted of $49.7 million of cash and $74.5 million of availability under our revolving credit facility. As a result of the anticipated capital investments in 2026, we expect a use of cash before financing greater than in 2025.

With that, I'll turn the call back to J.C. for closing remarks.

J.C.?

Thanks, Liz. To wrap up, I remain confident in our trajectory and long-term opportunities.

Our businesses provide critical inputs for many industries. As the need for uninterrupted energy grows, industry fundamentals for natural resources are expected to continue to strengthen, reinforcing the critical need to keep existing reliable baseload resources online.

In 2026, the National Coal Council, which is an advisory committee to the U.S. Secretary of Energy, was reestablished.

This council is focused on advising Department of Energy on reinforcing coal's strategic role in U.S. energy policy and providing actionable advice on sustaining coal plant operations and prioritizing coal to support grid reliability, which supports our country's economic competitiveness and national security.

The reestablishment of this council and the underlying improving regulatory environment reinforce my confidence in our prospects for 2026, as well as our overall business trajectory and longer-term growth opportunities. The building blocks for durable compounding growth at NACCO are firmly in place.

Our team is focused on execution, operational discipline, and delivering long-term returns for shareholders. We'll now turn the call over to any questions you may have.

Hey, good morning.

Good morning.

I guess starting with the coal division, can you quantify how much the step-down in Sabine work is?

We have not quantified that number.

Okay.

Doug, I think what I'd say is, when the mine and the plant were operating, and we're delivering coal, that was the highest level of income that we received from Sabine. As we stepped down into reclamation, that is appropriately because we're scaling down the amount of work, that fee was reduced.

As we exit that situation, that's when it goes away. I just want you to know that it's not going from full-bore production level, which we had, a couple years ago, to zero.

It's stepping down from a lower level.

Right. Okay.

At the same time, you get your price index goes up this year, right?

Yeah. You're speaking at Red Hills, at Mississippi Lignite Mining Company, it's based on what happens to indices month to month, but we believe that we're going to see an increase in price during the course of the year.

Okay. Does that flow in, is that weighted towards one Is Is there a seasonal element to that, when that when that really starts to benefit you?

It's a formula that compares current prices for relevant indices to prior indices. It's tracking movements over a one- and five-year period.

Just as we look at what was happening in the prior periods and what our expectations are in the future periods, we're able to develop a forecast. There's not really a seasonal component to price.

However, there is generally a seasonal component to deliveries. Particularly in the South, power plants operate at their heaviest level in the winter when it's cold, in the summer when it's hot, and the shoulder seasons typically don't operate at the same high level.

Okay. Seasonal was a bad choice of words.

I really just meant when in the year do you really start to see the benefit from that index reset?

It's really just going to depend on how the indices play out over time. I think we've mentioned before that petroleum is represented in the basket of indices, and who knows how that's going to play out with what's going on in the Middle East.

Very very difficult to forecast that at this time. Obviously, when we developed our forecast, we didn't know that this Middle East situation was going to develop.

I see. Could that create kind of a windfall situation given the spike in oil prices?

Look, I think we could play out lots of scenarios. I think you could say spikes in various things are going to drive the price up, but we can also see things happen in the market that cause some of those indices to drop as well.

I think it's really hard to forecast. Every day you pick up The Wall Street Journal and you can read even in just one newspaper, various views of how this might play out with respect to petroleum prices, and inflation,

and

interest rates, and all the other stuff.

I had understood from your previous comments that it wasn't actually the wholesale petroleum price, it was more of the diesel price at the pump. Is that true, or did I misunderstand there?

The price is based on published indices. It's not like we drive by the local gas station and see what diesel is selling for.

It's the

nationally,

federally published indices.

Okay. I got you.

I guess moving on to contract mining. How large, I know you probably don't want to quantify, but just relative to a typical contract, is the Army Corps of Engineers contract?

It's a significant contract. We're very excited about the opportunity, as we mentioned.

It's an opportunity for us to apply our skills in a new market instead of mining aggregates that are going to be used in either in a cement plant or sold as crushed aggregates, or sand and gravel. This is an opportunity to go use our skills for infrastructure projects.

It's a pretty sizable project for us, and we're excited about the new opportunity in the partnership.

What's the timing of that in terms of when that starts and when it gets up to full production?

We are already ramping up production. I don't actually know when it gets to full production.

Liz, do you know that?

I think it's going to depend a little bit on the timing of getting the additional dragline commissioned. It will ramp up throughout this year.

It's going to ramp up throughout the year, and it'll be full steam ahead. One of the things that I find interesting about this project, and I think we all are encouraged or excited by this feature, is this is not a contract where we're delivering aggregates, or mining aggregates for a customer that's responding to customer demand.

This is a contract where we've been asked to go in and move x amount of material. Obviously, we have to work in coordination with our customer to do that, but this isn't a contract that's got any exposure to market forces.

I think it's a pretty predictable, nice contract for us.

Do you think there's an opportunity to add more business like that?

We don't know, but I think we hope so.

Yeah. Okay.

How about Phoenix? How substantial is that new business?

That also is a nice contract. It's a sizable dragline that we've moved out there.

As Phoenix is just exploding with growth. It seems like lots of potential there.

Interesting. You gave your capital expense targets.

I guess two questions on that. I'll break them up.

On the first one, is it reasonable to think that that capital will be allocated in a manner similar to 2025 in terms of the divisional breakout?

You mean like the pie chart of CapEx?

How much is going to mining, and how much is going to oil and gas, and

I guess I'd break that down by saying we're pretty clear that we budget $20 million of investment capital for our minerals business. There's nothing saying that we have to spend that $20 million, it's just what we put in our budget.

We spend 20, and if we do, great, if we don't, that's okay, too. We're only going to spend it if we find the right projects.

That's kind of a fixed number, generally. The total that we published is a pretty big number.

We said that the majority of what we're going to spend is with respect to growth. I think it really determines how those opportunities play out.

I think we do disclose a breakout in the 10-K. Liz can probably point us to that in a second, but ultimately, this is going to depend on what opportunities do we really find.

If you're talking about our forecast, it's in the 10-K. If you want to talk about where does it actually get spent, it really is dependent upon what projects we find and which ones meet our investment criteria.

I think we've been really clear about how we think about deploying capital, and if we don't meet our investment criteria, then we just don't invest.

Right. In terms of

the

Sorry, go ahead.

I was going to say, you can find the breakout in the 10-K in our MD&A where we have a discussion of 2025 actual and 2026 planned CapEx.

Great. In terms of the Army Corps of Engineer work and the Phoenix work, that capital is already been spent, right?

This would be capital for new contracts, is that right?

There is some additional capital for the Army Corps of Engineers project. That's going to end up being a three-dragline project.

We're still getting the final draglines constructed and commissioned in order to do that project.

Oh, okay. Would you be able to say about how much is left on that project?

We haven't disclosed that. What we'd spend in 2026 is included in the $36 million we have for the Contract Mining segment.

Okay.

That number's in the 36.

Okay. I guess in terms of allocating to the minerals segment, do you have an opportunity to continue to invest capital in that operation?

Is that an attractive use of your capital as they expand?

A couple pieces of that. We think it's a very attractive use of our capital.

It's why we invested an additional amount in their operations. We're very enthusiastic about the investments that we've made with them.

I think it's a great piece of our Minerals and Royalty platform. The work that they're doing, I think, is for the most part funded.

One, I don't know that there would be additional opportunities to invest, but I also think we want to pay attention to diversifying our investments. The whole premise of Catapult and our mineral segment is we started with a highly concentrated investment in Appalachian natural gas assets, and the goal here is to diversify into other basins and other minerals.

Eiger is a piece of that. Taking more Eiger, I think, is more concentration as opposed to more diversification, which is our primary goal.

Now, I'm not going to rule out that we'd ever invest more in Eiger, but I'd say, generally, we're more likely to end up investing in mineral and royalty interests like we have in the past.

Okay. If you hit that capital target, my guess is you're going to be somewhat cash negative for the year.

Do you have a leverage level where you get uncomfortable or where you're willing to go up to?

I don't ever want to get to a level where I start to feel uncomfortable. We talk often about our desire to have a conservative financial structure.

As we've discussed, we've been through a period of investing in all these businesses, and we believe that we're entering a period of significant harvest in a invest and harvest business model. One, we don't know that we're going to spend the entire $89 million, and two, we're going to watch our level of harvest that's going on during the year, and we will certainly manage in an appropriate way so that we don't ever get to a point where we're having a call and I'm like, "Yeah, I'm a little uncomfortable with where we are in our leverage."

I don't want to get there.

Yeah. Okay.

I guess last question for me is just on Mitigation Resources. Is most of the revenue in the unallocated line, is that mostly Mitigation Resources?

Yes.

Okay. How are you feeling about that business in terms of growth and I saw that you said it would be profitable at the end of the year.

Is that something you expect to continue go forward into next year?

Yes, we expect it to reach profitability and grow from there. There's two parts to that business.

One is the mitigation banking business, speaking of invest and then harvest. We identify properties in high-growth areas.

In some instances, we'll acquire property with opportunity to improve the streams and/or wetlands on that property. You get permits approved with the Army Corps of Engineers, and then there's basically a 10-year process where we do work that would involve improving the streams and/or wetlands and then monitoring.

You receive credits. We know upfront how many credits we're going to get.

The mitigation banks that we've already got in place have a very large value of credits that are going to be released from them over time. We've got a pretty good horizon on the, we'll call it, credit inventory that we will be able to sell in the future from just our existing credits.

Now, that's all subject to timing, because, obviously, you've got to get through the Army Corps of Engineers upfront permitting process, then you've got milestones that we need to hit with the work that we're doing. We're confident that we can be successful with that.

Then you've also got what are customer projects? What's their timing look like?

When do they get their Army Corps permits, and how does their development proceed? We think all of this is moving in a positive direction and will continue to do so in the future.

All of that gets mixed in with shorter-term reclamation and restoration projects that we're finding really nice success in that part of the business. You blend those two together, and we think this business is on a really nice trajectory that'll really start taking hold later this year.

Great. Nice quarter, and glad to see things continue to go well overall, and so thank you for your hard work and for taking my questions.

Great. Doug, we always appreciate your questions.

Thanks you for your interest.

This is Christie. With that, I'll conclude our Q&A session.

Before we conclude, I'd like to provide a few reminders. A replay of our call will be available online later this morning.

We'll also post a transcript on the Investor Relations website when it becomes available. If you have any questions, please reach out to me.

My phone number is in the press release. I hope you enjoy the rest of your day, and I'll now turn the call back to Tina to conclude.