NFI Group Inc.

NFI Group Inc.

NFYEF
NFI Group Inc.US flagOther OTC
16.50
USD
-0.10
- -
1.97BMarket Cap

Q3 2020 · Earnings Call Transcript

Nov 11, 2020

APIChat

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. And welcome to the NFI Group Inc Third Quarter 2020 Financial Results Conference Call.

At this time, all participants' lines are on mute. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded.

After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the call over to your speaker today, Stephen King.

Please go ahead.

Stephen King

Thank you, Amy. Good morning everyone and welcome to NFI Group's third quarter 2020 results conference call.

This is Stephen King, NFI Group Director, Treasury Corporate Development and Investor Relations speaking. Joining me today are Paul Soubry, President and Chief Executive Officer and Pipasu Soni, Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer.

As Amy mentioned, this call is being recorded and a replay will be made available shortly on our website. On this morning's call, we'll be walking through the financial results presentation that can be found in the performance and report section of our website.

We will call out the slide number referred to as we walk through the deck. In addition the results presentation, we encourage all participants to review the consolidated financial statements and the associated management discussion and analysis and press release.

All posted to our website and on SEDAR. Starting with slide 2, I will remind all participants and others that certain information provided on today's call may be forward looking and based on assumptions anticipated results that are subject to uncertainties.

If any one or more of these uncertainties materialize or should the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary significantly from those expected. You're advised to review the risk factors found in NFI's press releases and other public filings on SEDAR for more details.

We also want to remind listeners that NFI's financial statements are presented in US dollars, the company's functional currency, and all amounts refer to are in US dollars unless otherwise noted. On today's call Paul will start with a recap of the quarter and then Pipasu will take us through the financial results and our progress on the NFI Forward initiative.

Paul will then conclude with some market insights and discuss NFI's outlook. Following that we will open the call to analysts' questions.

I'll now pass it over to Paul.

Paul Soubry

Thanks Stephen, and good morning, ladies and gentlemen. First, I'd like to acknowledge that today is November 11.

Is Remembrance Day, and Memorial Day observed in the Commonwealth member states to remember the members of their Armed Forces who've died in the line of duty. We are grateful to those who have given their lives for their countries.

Before I get into the details of the quarter for first time listeners, and those not familiar with NSI Group, I'll quickly provide some background on our business. Starting on slide 3, NFI Group is a leading global independent bus and coach manufacturer with operations in 10 countries and more than 105,000 vehicles and service.

Our businesses diverse with over 450 combined years of bus and coach experience of our individual companies. Turning to slide 4r, NFI's history of growth and profitability is built on organic growth, product improvement, vertical integration and strategic acquisitions.

Over the last decade, our business went through two major phases. First from 2010 to 2014, we consolidate the North American transit space through several acquisitions, and also began our lean operational journey.

From 2015 to 2019, we diversified our business by entering the North American motor coach space acquired our fiberglass suppliers, entered the low floor cutaway business. And finally we expanded globally by acquiring Alexander Dennis just last year.

As you can see from the slide, with our revenue adjusted EBITDA tripled from 2010 to 2019. On slide 5, we highlight that we are much more than just a vehicle manufacturer.

We are now a total mobility solutions provider and a leader in technology development. NFI is the strongest Zero Emission bus offering in the marketplace today, offering battery electric, fuel cell electric and electric trolleys with the industry's widest range of battery electric mass transit vehicles ranging from single deck to double deck and articulated buses and motor coach variants.

In 2018, we identified that infrastructure is one of the main challenges for operators, and we launched infrastructure solutions business to support our customers with their transition to zero. We are driving change with the associated advanced driver assistance systems including autonomous technology, and we're focused on telematics and connected vehicles allowing agencies and operators to improve their performance.

Finally, we're driving the evolution of a Zero Emission future with the largest Zero Emission bus or ZEB capacity in North America and the UK. And unlike our competitors, we have the capability to produce diesel, natural gas, hybrid and Zero Emission buses.

This is a key differentiator as it allows us to continue building traditional propulsion products for our customers, as they make their transition to Zero Emission over the next decade or more. On slide 6, the third quarter of 2020 saw strong improvement from the lows of the second quarter.

But we continue to be dramatically impacted by the COVID pandemic. During the quarter, we're able to reopen all of our manufacturing part fabrication facilities, with a focus on ensuring the health and safety of our team members, our suppliers and our customers.

While our facilities have resumed operations, we've adjusted our production rates to match the current market demands, offered order deferrals and backlog, unexpected new vehicle awards. This reduction is essentially especially true within the private operator segments of our business, including North American motor coach and the UK business.

As COVID-19 has created challenges for our markets, we move quickly to reduce our costs and preserve cash flow. While a significant portion of our costs are variable and linked to production, we focused on reducing firm overhead and admin costs wherever possible.

During the past six months we've eliminated significant costs through staffing reductions. And while we're able to remove certain costs immediately, the size and international scope of our business combined with the multiple production facilities, and aftermarket distribution centers requires us to take a thoughtful approach.

We want to ensure that we did not make cuts that would impact our long-term capacity, or competitiveness, or ability to deliver for customers and win new awards. Pipasu will discuss these cost reduction efforts in detail when he walks us through the NFI Forward, our company wide transformation initiative that will ensure we emerge as simpler, leaner business, with fewer business units and a reduced footprint.

While our third quarter performance was in line with our expectation, it was impacted by several non one-time non-recurring items for which we normalized. These include severance and restructuring as well as COVID related charges.

With the third quarter complete, we again reiterate our full year adjusted EBITDA guidance of $145 million to $155 million. In addition, our liquidity remains strong and we're focused on prudently managing our cash flow and de-leveraging our balance sheet.

We continue to believe that our cash position and our credit capacity under our existing credit facilities is sufficient to fund operations, meet our financial obligations as they come do, provide the necessary funds for capital expenditures, dividend payments, and other operational needs. Based on our anticipated cash flow generation, we do not expect to utilize the incremental sidecar facility that we put in place in April 2020.

Recall that this facility was implemented as insurance to ensure we had enough financial resource to weather the COVID storm no matter how deep it got. The fact that we have not needed to use it speaks to the resiliency of our business.

We had a covenant waiver in place for total leverage ratio TLR, which measures total leverage against adjusted EBITDA on a trailing four quarter basis on all our facilities until September 28, 2020, at which point covenants then resumed at more relaxed levels based on a prorated calculation that excluded the second quarter of 2020 results. The company now expects that the combination of lower trailing adjusted EBITDA in 2020 combined with the company's current debt profile and the ongoing uncertainty created by COVID may impact compliance with the TLR covenants starting in the first quarter of next year.

We're in late stage negotiations with our banking partners to obtain further covenant relief and look forward to announcing the details of that very soon. Slide 7 shows our deliveries in the quarter and the backlog at the quarter end.

During the quarter, our backlog declined slightly due primarily to deliveries outpacing new awards as some awards continue to be delayed due to the pandemic. Our ability to deliver profitable results highlights the importance of our backlog and the visibility that it affords us.

We anticipate that we will see increased order activity in the first half of 2021 as previously delayed orders are released, which will help rebuild our backlog. Our backlog is heavily weighted towards public transit agencies, or government agencies make longer term multiyear orders.

Deliveries were down slightly within transit but down 32% in motor coach reflecting the immediate impact that team head on our private operators, medium duty and low four cutaway delivers workup significantly, as demand remains high. I'll now ask Pipasu to take us through the detailed financial results.

Over to you Pipasu.

Pipasu Soni

Thank you, Paul, and good morning, everyone. Turning to slide 8, our third quarter performance saw significant improvement from the second quarter of 2020.

But it did see some decline on a year-over-year basis due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Manufacturing operations resumed during the period but at lower production levels and private markets continued to be challenged by the pandemic, leading to revenues declining by 8.5% when compared to Q3, 2019.

Adjusted EBITDA also saw a decline year-over-year. We lowered variable overhead cost to match with production but experienced unfavorable fixed overhead and SG&A absorption.

We are strategically removing fixed costs from the business to right size our operations. Free cash flow was down by $10.2 million as we saw lower adjusted EBITDA and higher interest expense somewhat offset by reduced cash capital expenditures and cash taxes.

Turning to slide 9; I'll outline our net earnings and the adjustments that we've made to reflect the impact of one-time non-recurring items. During the quarter, we had a net loss of $24.9 million or $0.40 per share.

While some of this loss was due to the same items that impacted adjusted EBITDA, the main drivers on a tax adjusted basis were $16.8 million in COVID-19 related costs and $17.5 million in severance and restructuring costs. After adjusting for these items, plus mark-to-market gains and unrealized foreign exchange gains, our adjusted net earnings was $5.7 million or $0.09 per share.

We provided a detailed reconciliation of adjusted net earnings in the appendix of this presentation on slides 20 and 21. Now turning to slide 10, in July 2020, we launched NFI Forward, an initiative that will transform NFI Group into an integrated operating company.

As Paul mentioned at the beginning of our call, we've completed several acquisitions that today have run as independent businesses; we see significant opportunities for financial improvement through business combinations, and through the rollout of common platforms and systems across the NFI Group. That's the power of the NFI Forward initiative.

With the efficiency gains we get from integrating the businesses, we generate significant returns for our shareholder base, while continuing to offer world class mobility solutions. The anticipated cost savings will show up in three areas our financials; lower direct material costs, lower manufacturing overheads and lower SG&A expenses.

In aggregate, NFI Forward is expected to deliver an 8% to 10% reduction to both manufacturing overhead and SG&A based on 2019 run rates. We anticipate generating $18 million of savings in 2020 driven by a combination of lower material costs, and the benefit of restructuring initiatives.

In 2021, we will add another $29 million in savings for a total run rate of $47 million. As the New Flyer and MCI business units run as one combined business.

We consolidate the NFI parts and ADI North America parks operations and we realize full run rate savings from actions carried out in 2020. In 2022, we expect to be able to consolidate plants within our North American network, which combined with further administrative reductions will generate an additional $13 million in savings and finally in 2023, will achieve another $7 million to bring total expected annualized savings to $67 million.

These cost reductions will generate significant volume leverage. When markets recover will grow revenues on a lower fixed cost base would drop through adjusted EBITDA.

We also expect an additional $10 million in cash flow saving over the period of 2020 to 2023, driven by a decrease in cash leases as we reduce our total facility footprint and the benefits of a central treasury team to lower interest in banking cost. In addition to these items, we continue to explore other cash generation options, including a significant focus on working capital.

One of these working capital improvement projects was our recent sale of MCI as Pre-Owned coach pool for approximately $19 million cash. As the pandemic had caused significant challenges in the North American private motor coach market by immediately and dramatically decreasing demand for pre-owned motor coaches and putting pressure on market values that divestiture of the asset pool was prudent and directly aligned with the strategy of NFI Forward.

It will also help to ensure that NFI is well positioned when the coach market recovers from the pandemic. We will continue to disclose the impacts of NFI Forward within our financial results as we achieve them.

In addition, we'll also discuss NFI Forward program in detail in our January 2020 Investor Day that Stephen will discuss later this morning. I'll now turn the call over to Paul to discuss our outlook.

Paul Soubry

Thanks Pipasu. Circling back to my earlier comments on 2021 being a transition year, I'll comment now on how COVID-19 has impacted our end markets.

Starting on slide 11; our discussions with transit operators suggests long term demand for transit vehicles is intact. I'll point out that our active Bid Universe which is bids in process and bids already submitted are up 27% year-over-year.

The five-year total Bid Universe continues to fluctuate and currently reflects the reduction in expected motor coach public demand. An overall positive signs that there were only a few transit RFPs have been cancelled to date, even with the ongoing pandemic.

Another development with respect to orders the fact that the orders are smaller in total size and with fewer options. This trend predates COVID-19, and it's something we've been developing as agencies make the transition to ZEB.

As an essential service government support is critical to public transit. No matter the political affiliation, there is a desire to fund public transit in all of our major markets.

The US government has been especially strong supporters of transit through the pandemic through a variety of stimulus packages. On slide 12, we will provide an overview of some of this support.

In addition to government support, the recent US elections highlighted that there's an overwhelming public support for public transit. Where 13 out of 15 transits related ballot measures were passed.

These results add to the 32 public transit measures already passed by voters in 2020, a 92% win rate for the year. The measures represent more than $38 billion in new funding for US public transit.

Longer term, the potential successor to the FAST Act was unveiled in June of 2020 through the investing in a new vision for the environment and surface transportation in America, also known as the INVEST in America Act. This $494 billion Act aims at providing sufficient funds for improvements to US infrastructure, including transit.

The draft specifically focused on reducing the US carbon footprint and assisting with the conversion to electrified mass transit vehicles. This includes $1.7 billion in proposed funding for Zero Emission buses, a fivefold increase from the FAST Act.

The INVEST in America Act is a five-year proposal, which provides transit agencies with longer term visibility as they execute on their capital plans. The Act is not yet been approved, but is a significant positive step in the right direction.

In addition, we're pleased to see that the FAST Act extended for one more year to provide transit agencies with more confidence, while the US works through the impact of the elections and a new administration. The stated priorities of US President Elect Joe Biden on investment and environmentally friendly public transit is very encouraging.

The movement to battery or fuel cell electric buses continues to be a trend across NFI's various markets, and there is potential that the recovery from COVID-19 may accelerate this transition. A recent development that supports the continued expectation of increased demand for ZEB was the Canadian government's October 1, 2020 announcement of $1.5 billion in financing through the Canadian Infrastructure Bank to support the adoption of Zero Emission buses and charging infrastructure.

The financing is expected to be delivered over a 24 to 36-month period. NFI is the leader in North America and the UK for Zero Emission buses and would benefit from increased transition to ZEB.

We currently have ZEB vehicles on trial in major cities in North America and the UK and New Zealand. ZEB orders are growing and now make up 8% of our total backlog, up 4% at the same time last year, and makes up 26% of our active Bid Universe.

New Flyer can manufacturers ZEB at all of our facilities. ADL has delivered - most ZEBs in the UK.

And MCI is now selling its innovative battery electric coach and ARBOC electric Equess shuttle bus is currently in testing. On slide 13, you can see how our private customer markets have been dramatically impacted by the COVID pandemic.

As motor coach offers depend heavily on tourism, travel, conventions, sports and employee transportation. They've been challenged by the negative impacts and immediate impacts of the pandemic.

In North America, motor coaches deliveries through the first half of 2020 are down 57% and over 80% of coach industry employees have been furloughed. We expect the private motor coach market will recover as travel restrictions are lifted and vaccine dose rolled out, but this will take time.

And we expect the market will continue to be challenged well through 2021. Recent positive vaccine developments and announcement are encouraging and we view them as positive towards private and public market recoveries.

In the UK transit market, where private operators operate public routes, the first half of 2020 deliveries were down 65%, reflecting the impact of lockdowns and travelers restrictions across the UK. ADL adjusted production at Scottish facilities, rationalizing chassis production at its Gilbert location and ruling fixed costs through a reduction in administrative positions.

We are working closely with customers to plan for 2021 and beyond, as many, many bus vehicles need replacement. We do expect that there will be overall improvement in fiscal 2020 and for ADL's delivery activity as ADL delivers more vehicles to customers in Germany and Ireland and also sees growth in its Asia Pacific markets.

The positive contribution from various markets speaks to the strength of ADL market diversity. Within our aftermarket segment, we continue to expect demand for heavy duty transit parts as operators in North America international markets complete regular maintenance, and invest in additional products to complete, clean and protect their vehicles.

The large fleet of active essential service transit vehicles provides us with visibility and generally recurrent revenue stream. The private component of the aftermarket business, which is primarily MCI and ADL coaches will continue to be negatively impacted by the operators either in their vehicles.

The private component of the parts business represents about 30% of that segments revenue, and we expect those parts sales will recover over time as businesses reopen, and leisure and business travel resumes. Turning to our financial outlook on slide 14; as I mentioned earlier on the call, we reconfirmed our adjusted EBITDA guidance with an expectation will deliver between $145 million and $155 million for fiscal 2020, which would represent a $52.3 million or $62.3 million of adjusted EBITDA during the fourth quarter of 2020.

We also reconfirm our expectations that our property plant equipment expenditures will be approximately $25 million for fiscal 2020. Looking forward, based on our current market conditions, and expected future demand, we anticipate that 2021 financial results will see significant improvement over fiscal 2020.

But we also see 2021 as a transition period. With the impacts of COVID pandemic continue to create challenge for end markets.

Management's certain visibility on components and it's expected 2021 results driven by our firm backlog, expected option conversions and anticipate new awards, but delays in public awards decreased private sector demand and uncertainty surrounding the timing and magnitude of government stimulus, create some year for full year 2021 results. There is no doubt that COVID-19 has impacted our 2021.

But long term, buses and coaches will recover and we will play a critical role as the spinal cord of cities around the world. There will be bumps in the road as we recover to normal run rates.

But market recovery combined with structural changes made by our NFI Forward initiative will make us a more competitive and more cost-efficient market leader. I'll now turn it back to Steven to summarize today's discussion to review the NFI investment thesis and introduce our plans for 2021 Investor Day.

Following that, we'll open the call up to analysts' questions. Stephen?

Stephen King

Thanks Paul. Sticking to slide 14, I'll recap this morning's call.

NFI's Q3 2020 performance demonstrates NFI's resiliency, strong backlog position and ability to respond to the ongoing economic realities of the COVID-19 pandemic. During the quarter, our facility successfully resumed production with strong health and safety processes in place to protect employees.

We have strong liquidity and currently have no concerns with our cash flow generation or cash flow position. We anticipate that we'll need covenant relief in 2021, mostly due to lower trailing adjusted EBITDA, and we are in detailed negotiations with our banking partners.

Overall markets remain challenged, but we continue to see strong active bids with potential for awards in 2021. Current backlog in 2020 deferrals provide a base for 2021 volume, but we do expect lower than pre Covid-19 levels, with 2021 being a transition year primarily in private markets.

NFI is the leader in ZEBs in North America and the UK, adoption is increasing, and stimulus funding would support acceleration and get more ZEBs into the market. The private motor coach market is expected to take a number of years to recover.

But we are seeing some positive signs in sports and vaccines and active travel will drive increased activity. NFI Forward it is a primary focus across the group.

The various initiatives that are underway will position NFI for recovery, drive volume leverages and improve our margins. Slide 15 provides key points and what we believe makes NFI an attractive investment.

I won't go into detail on these items. But we'll highlight that we are entirely focused on bus and coach with a strong public customer base and recurring revenue part stream.

We have the largest ZEB capacity in North America and in the UK, proven track record in delivering electric vehicles and will lead the markets transition to a Zero Emission future. NFI Forward initiatives will create meaningful volume leverage; when markets recover and we deliver revenue growth will do so with a lower fixed cost base.

And finally, we invest in our business and return capital to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. Finishing on slide 16; I'm excited to announce our Virtual Investor Day is happening on Monday, January 11 2021.

This year's event will be especially exciting as we will unveil our plans to drive the future of mobility, including updates on the evolution to Zero Emission fleets, growth of our infrastructure solutions business, how we plan to leverage telematic and connected vehicles to create stronger relationships with customers, and the numerous advanced driver assistance projects we are investing in to make vehicle safer for operators, customers and communities. The Investor Day will also provide details on the various NFI Forward projects, insight to environmental social governance efforts or ESG at NFI and provide a forward-looking outlook.

We hope you can all join us for this exciting event. Details on how and the RSVP can be found on our website.

More information included the agenda for the event will be released in December. We will now open the line for questions.

Amy, please provide instructions to our callers.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Mark Neville with Scotia Bank.

MarkNeville

Hey, good morning, guys. First, nice to see the sequential improvements.

So good there, maybe just on the outlook. Well, I appreciate all the detail.

I guess from a high level I'm thinking about Q4 and then into 2021. Again, I know you haven't provided guidance for 2021 yet, but if I'm thinking about the Q4 run rate, you sort of adjusted your production.

I know Q4 is typically seasonally stronger. But I think part of that's coach so maybe that doesn't come back.

So if I'm thinking about 2021, if I sort of take Q4 as my run rate per quarter add on some of the NFI Forward benefits, I am sort of getting in ballpark of sort of what you're thinking for next year. Again, maybe there's stimulus and maybe there's a vaccine that's sort of the wildcard, is that least right now a reasonable way to think about next year.

PaulSoubry

Well, thanks, Mark, good questions and lots in that. And of course we went a little bit longer to try and tell the story of all the moving pieces.

Q4 historically had quite a component for our business that had transactional motor coach sales. And of course, all of us remember that the changes New America - in the US tax structure that then allowed for significant opportunities of accelerated depreciation, we had a massive sale of motor coaches, private motor coaches in the fourth quarter that we don't anticipate this year.

So what we've got for fourth quarter basically is all of our slots are filled. We're running effectively at slightly lower production rates.

Now Q4 effectively is a maybe I'll ask Pipasu to talk about how it related to the 2021 forecast, we see a full year increase quite substantially from the current 145 to the 155. Obviously, the change in US administration has an impact how fast that kind of discussion around stimulus or any kind of additional support for the US public transit.

In Canada, we now see this discussion of the Canadian government, the Canadian Infrastructure Bank, which is now rattling through the discussion with various transit operators. We also have on the cost side, as we described lots of takeout.

So Pipasu, how would you articulate or provide insight into Mark's comment about run rate relative to Q4 and 2021?

PipasuSoni

Yes, I guess the way I'm kind of seeing it right now, Mark, is as I kind of think about Q1, obviously, there's going to be a little bit of a mixed component that we're going to have kind of going into Q1. So when we think about the run rate, obviously, if we compare it to Q1 of 2020, most likely will be slightly less than what we're seeing in Q1 2020.

And we'll obviously provide more detail at the Investor Day, but to kind of give a little bit more detail on that - on the move to electrics that we're experiencing as well.

MarkNeville

Okay, that's helpful. Maybe - I appreciate that.

If I can just ask about the covenant relief, I would assume it's a much easier conversation to have today than it was four or five months ago. Again, it's sort of it doesn't sound to me that there's sort of any material sort of get backs or again, I guess, I would think it was a dividend to get just negotiate it, but I don't know, maybe it's hard to comment, but just curious to hear your thoughts on that?

PipasuSoni

Yes. For me, I would say as we kind of think about the covenants, I mean, one of the things that you've already realized that Paul has mentioned it, as well as Steven, but when you look at the back half of 2020, versus the back half of 2019.

If you're starting to just do the math, right, we're roughly I think, 180 when we were in the back half of 2019, we're roughly 120-ish when we're in the back half of 2020. So as we think about it and we started thinking about our covenants, we feel pretty good in terms of getting through 2020.

And we feel fairly tight, maybe in Q1 2021. So we said, hey, at this stage, let's go ahead and get the relief.

The banks are very supportive of it. We've got great results from our banking partners.

And then I think, to Steven's point, and to Paul's point, no liquidity concerns whatsoever, we should be close to 200 plus liquidity without the sidecar by the time we exit this year. And we're just making sure that we meet our leverage covenants kind of going forward, but just have some relief, just in case.

So should be kind of a moot point is the way I kind of think about it. But again, Steven, you're running treasure first, anything else that you're saying that I may be missing?

StephenKing

No. I think you've covered all the key points possible, I would just reiterate, as we mentioned, as we do our cash flow forecasting dividend is an important part of the story.

And obviously, we made the cut earlier this year, but being able to continue the dividends at the current levels is important to us. And so that's something we factored in into our cash flow forecast, and as Pipasu mentioned, right, where we think our liquidity levels will be so confident in the cash position and confident, we'll get this.

This amendment done with our banking partners.

MarkNeville

Okay, that's helpful. Sorry, I said last question.

Paul, did you say it's exiting the year, $200 million liquidity? And is that sort of apples-to-apples sort of $414 million now?

PipasuSoni

Yes. So I'm basically taking out, just you know so I'm taking out the sidecar facility whenever I give that number.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Chris Murray with ATB Capital Markets.

ChrisMurray

Yes. Thanks, guys.

Good morning. So maybe to follow up on Mark's question, just too maybe make it a little clearer.

You'd previously thought about or talked about have been about just a hair over a $1 billion lever by the end of Q4. Is that maybe a better way to think about?

StephenKing

Yes. I think that's still the plan from a net debt perspective, Chris, obviously, working capital a little bit higher this year because of some of the private market.

ADL and MCI private market coaches and private market vehicles. So I think, yes, that's kind of the right number to think about for net debt.

ChrisMurray

Okay, so that kind of implies you're going to have to - you'll have earnings as you said, above $50 million in EBITDA plus I'm going to get some working capital recover in Q4. And is that the way to put it all together to get there?

StephenKing

Yes, that's the right way to think about it. So, yes, kind of I think we said $52 million to $62 million of adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter based on our guidance, some working cap improvement, there's always some at the end of the year.

And then but we won't get as much as we would have seen in 2019 just because of that like Paul mentioned, private coach is usually our busiest period in the fourth quarter, but some working cap improvement. And so yes, if you put all that together, that's - and that's why I think as Pipasu mentioned, it's more of a 2021 issue on the covenants as we're looking at trailing EBITDA has dropped significantly from 2019 to 2020.

PaulSoubry

Chris, it's Paul, just another point of color. You'll read in our materials, and we talked about today, we liquidated our Pre-Owned coach pool, we really didn't feel that that pool was going to turn their significant costs in exercising those coaches, managing them, updating them when our facilities and so forth.

What we usually see this time of year is obviously, as I mentioned the burn down of our new coach inventory. And of course, I think we talked about it last quarter, we have now stopped inducting new motor coaches.

We did that a couple of months ago. But we still have new coach, motor coach inventory on hand both at ADL and MCI.

And so the trick for us obviously, as we move into 2021, is we've got to burn down that new coach inventory over time by relieving ourselves with a Pre-Owned coach pool we've solely focused now on transactions associated with getting rid of new coaches. That should help the net debt level as we move through 2021.

ChrisMurray

Perfect, great, and actually that was another one of my questions. So at this point, you have no more use coach on inventory.

Is that the right way to think about it?

PaulSoubry

That's exactly right.

ChrisMurray

Okay. Good.

And then I guess my next question because it's maybe the least clear part of how this thing evolves. Can you talk a little bit about the UK market?

Your thoughts around stimulus and whatever this bill would be, and how soon or what kind of impact are you guys thinking about as we go into 2021 in terms of maybe rebuilding some of the order books for ADL in the UK market?

PaulSoubry

It's a really good question, Chris. And you'll remember when we acquired ADL; we were quite bullish on ADL for 2020 and 2021.

Because the UK market had gone through kind of four or five years of a slowdown on replacement factors, and so we saw a bunch of pent-up demand as we started the year, most of the ADL customers in the UK, were talking and we were deeply negotiating quite a significant ramp up to the business. Just prior to COVID, I think it was in early February, the UK Government and Prime Minister announced a $5.1 billion plan to support and assist private operators with a conversion to clean and green vehicles, in addition to other things like some bike paths, and some other initiatives throughout the UK.

So obviously, COVID changes everything, all of those operators, we're still operating, but slowed down the number of buses on the road, the frequency of operation and so forth. So we go through a period from kind of March or April to now where those operators are unsure of the pace of recovery of ridership, and therefore fare box and therefore income.

The UK Government obviously in parallel to the COVID dynamic is working through the Brexit dynamics, the dialogue with the government and with the operators is actually in the last I'm going to say a month to 45 days is actually heated up quite positively about something in the next month or two that could be really unique to rebuild the schedule for ADL for 2021. So as we sit here today, I've got nothing other than dialogue, discussion, interest activity to tell you about further volume for Alexander Dennis in the UK, we talked a little bit about a rationalizing our capacity.

And so we basically had three production facilities. And we've now rationalized that down to two.

And so we also believe that as that market recovers, and as we move into 2021, we start to see some of those orders come through, we've also got a reduced cost base, which will only enhance the profitability of our Alexander Dennis going forward. So I wish I could point to a specific bill or a specific announcement, we know that that stuff is actually coming and very positive off late.

And as soon as we get any positive or any firm indications will obviously announce that. The good news about ADL is that they've been able to secure some work now, as you know in Germany that we've delivered the pilots, we're now planning for the first tranche to be built in the UK starting in 2021.

And a very significant order was secured for Ireland. So a lot of positive stuff about ADL in the last couple months, and we expect a significant recovery in its performance as we head into 2021.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Kevin Chiang with CIBC.

KevinChiang

Hi, good morning, everybody. Thanks for taking my questions here.

And may be just first off, if I can get a sense of how your customers are feeling? I recognize there's a lot of government and bipartisan government support for public transportation but you saw a bit of a dip in revenues in the quarter-over-quarter, you saw a little bit of a tick up in cancellations.

Just wondering, are you seeing a little bit of fatigue in your customer base, just given how long it seems to be? And how long it's taken to get a second stimulus bill.

And is that what how long it takes to get some of these orders flowing through in 2021. Would we need to see a definitive fiscal bill passed in the US for transit agencies to kind of put into orders into effect next year?

PaulSoubry

Well, yes, look, it's a good comment. And a good question.

All of us are fatigued with the COVID dynamic and every sense of the word every day, we come to work and find out how many people have tested positive or the people around them that have tested positive and then they've got to do a test it and so on and so forth. Our customers continue, there was a bit of a recovery in ridership, and then we saw the wave two, and then it slowed down and so forth.

I will tell you our conversations with the public transit agencies of late are actually starting to be a lot more encouraging and a lot more positive. These guys are resilient.

I mean, they've gone through funding cycles, they've gone through extensions of bills, and they've gone through all that other stuff. And yet they're warriors and operate all day long every day to support the public transit needs in every city.

I would suggest is a couple of positive things. Most of the operators, a good portion have now gone through it, let's call it a trial phase on Zero Emission, whether it's battery electric, or have late more and more trying hydrogen fuel cells and realizing range performance, how they're going to deal with the charging infrastructure strategies and so forth.

So the pain we had last year of we don't know what this means for operation. I think a lot of them have got enough experience now to have a view of what they want to do.

The second issue is they were waiting for a second round of stimulus that hasn't happened. Even in the last couple of days, we're seeing more and more announcements about we may see something in late November or December, which I think our operators are seeing as positive.

But there's a generally a positive sentiment around President Elect Biden and his views around public transit and the need to fundamentally invest in kind of lean green infrastructure associated with it. So I would say they're clearly, these guys have gone through hell, and they've been frustrated.

But they are warriors. And they've really responded in the last little while in conversations with us.

I'll just give you a stat for example, Kevin, you've been to our vehicle Innovation Center in Anniston, Alabama, and we took that now online. And over the last two or three weeks, we've had four virtual sessions, we're getting between 85 and 100 customers each time on those virtual calls.

And so the engagement and interest is really, really strong, some of which will obviously want to try and share with you and others at the Investor Day in January 2021. On the private side, there's still movement and activity for the private shuttle type operators.

But those small or even medium sized, privately owned motor coach operators that are relying on sports, or leisure or travel and so forth are still depressed. And we expect that as I talked in our notes here, that to go through 2021, and potentially even a little bit longer, so we're not planning on a massive recovery for that portion of the business.

KevinChiang

That's very helpful. If I could maybe just a couple of modeling questions, one, you held your guidance for the year, again highlighting the sequential recovering your business.

Just wondering when you look at the offsets from the government support programs, I guess, first what would you anticipate in terms of Q4 and it just flowing kind of in line with what you would expect when you are late - when you reintroduce your guidance in 2020 or it comes little bit higher than you anticipated? Orr maybe below what you would anticipate or just giving your pace of recovery.

PaulSoubry

Well, I think if you'll remember that we started the year with $320 million to $350 million guidance for 2021. Obviously, the immediately when COVID hit us in March, we had no how - we have no idea how long or how deep.

We went from March to August with no guidance out there trying to understand what to do. And our whole focus was on shutting our facilities or idling them, but also the safety of our employees.

When we started back up really in earnest in late July and August, we set our guidance based on what we had for known slots, we knew that there wasn't going to be very many private sales. And it was really about known and sold slots this year.

The reason we still have a reiterated guidance that is a $10 million range, if you will, for 2020 is the reality of the COVID impact on our business every day about absenteeism, challenges, delivery challenges with customers, inspector dynamics and all that other stuff. Look, we're really confident; we don't have to worry about selling anything in the fourth quarter of this year.

It's about executing and delivering. And we're managing extremely well, notwithstanding all those daily bumps and bruises.

But as we head and move into 2021, and we're filling up our slots through the first half of the year, we're relatively confident. And all these positives that we're starting to see around government interest around potential UK stimulus, the Canadian government and so forth, we think bodes well for the back half of next year.

But that's really where our focus is right now is selling the slots for the back half of next year.

PipasuSoni

I think I'd just add to your question, just at a very high level when we think about the UK furlough program, we're thinking somewhere in the $1 million range, getting that into Q4 2020. And then for the [Indiscernible] stuff, we obviously got that built in, but we're kind of working back because there is a little bit of uncertainty if we will get that last.

KevinChiang

Okay, you've been building this into your outlook, maybe just last one for me. I'm sure you've all seen just how cheap the capital is, I guess for a lot of new mobility companies that are looking to enter into the electric vehicle space, especially the commercial vehicle space, just how using the competitive environment.

I know a lot of these players don't have actual buses or vehicles yet. But a fear that as you get through this recovery, you're going to see more competition or more pricing pressure or are your customers saying anything that suggests anything worrisome on the competitive front as you look out the next few years.

PaulSoubry

Well, look, we've had people come and go in our space over the years and as you know, the dynamics in North America are in public transit space. And even the private motor coach are dramatically different in our world and somebody showing up with electric truck or electric car.

Getting through Altoona, getting through the customization of the vehicle to meet those customers. In some cases, having to meet shaker table tests and all these other things is not simple.

PipasuSoni

And I'll just point to one of our competitors that is only an EV provider, they've been around for 14 years, and they have sub 600 vehicles on the road. And so this is why we're so focused on making sure investors realize and understand, this is not an off the shelf product, it is highly customized, highly engineered, and highly unique for each operator.

There are incredibly challenging and difficult testing environment that we have to get through with our customers. And then there's the whole dynamic of the charging infrastructure and the pace at which and the experience of which the operator needs, and the OEM needs to provide to put those vehicles in service.

And so I go back to, I'm very comfortable of our competitive position, given what we offer today, given our evolution to the Zero Emission; given the fact that we're the leader, both in electric and trolley, but also in the fuel cells that we can migrate as those customers want to migrate at the pace. But we're still taking orders today for conventional diesel vehicle, hybrid vehicles, natural gas vehicles; it is not a light switch.

And so anybody showing up tomorrow that says, I can sell a vehicle to you to Mr. Customer in a public environment really hasn't got a lot of traction.

Your point around competitive intensity is, I would suggest no different today than it's been in the past. There's the desire to want to fill slots in the short term, the desire like us and our competitors to want to build up backlog.

Some of our investors look at us and say, oh, my God, you're burning down your backlog, we look at as, thank God, and we built up a backlog. And thank God, we have the flexibility to manage with our customers today, on option conversions and state schedules, as we've talked about, which has been a massive part of the order in the last little while to be able to support that customer.

We are seeing some spot buys now that maybe we didn't see in the past. In the last six months, I can think of a handful of operators that said, hey, look, I found a unique way of getting some funds, I want a batch of buses, and can you deliver quickly.

And the fact that we can build any kind of vehicle in any one of our facilities, whether it's diesel, natural gas, hybrid gas, electric or fuel cells, allows us to be able to respond in a responsible pricing manner, not having to tank price. There are some situations where there's very aggressive pricing, no question, but I wouldn't say that's the predominant part of our market today.

Operator

Your next question comes from Cameron Doerksen with National Bank Financial.

CameronDoerksen

Thank you. Good morning.

I guess one of the questions or one of the theses that we hear out here in on the sort of effects of the pandemic is that more people will move away from the cities, there'll be therefore, less need for public transit. I mean, I don't necessarily agree with that thesis.

But I'm just wondering if you're hearing from any of your transit customers that they're perhaps in their long-term planning are making an accounting for that potentiality? I mean is there any change in what transit agencies are planning as far as replacement of buses or new buses that would lead you to be worried about, I guess, a smaller market, and five years down the road?

PaulSoubry

Well, there's - it's a really good question, Cameron, I think you're right, it is very topical. And we see it all day long in the news about more lockdowns and more work from homes and so forth.

I can honestly say that we haven't heard it as a major theme from a group or many of our customers around public transit is no longer needed, or it's needed at a fraction of what it was. I think there's also tremendous political pressure in every city, in North America, let's call it or even the UK or Hong Kong, to want to push not less, but more public transit for two reasons.

A, the congestion continues to be massive in major cities and trying to get, it's romantic to say to get more people in their cars or more people in Uber, but that's the congestion dynamic. The second part of that is now that public transit truly has green and Zero Emission elements to it.

We're hearing almost the opposite to what you just highlighted in terms of more politicians and more cities want to find a way to get more people back into public transit. That is both congestion positive, but also environmentally friendly.

And I think we're going to see more and more of that, especially with the green agenda of the next administration that talks about the environmental footprint and impact and the same thing with Canada for that matter in a massive way. I've had the benefit of talking to many federal ministers who are really trying to marry a public transit agenda with a green agenda.

And the fact that we now can deliver vehicles that look and smell and feel and Wi Fi and operation and comfort and noise way different than it's been a 10-year-old vehicle, in addition to that Zero Emission dynamic has lots of attraction for politicians. There is no question certain businesses are going to say we were successful at some people working at home.

And we may see a slight drop off in some of those people that used to drop to work. But essential service providers still need to get work; you can't manufacture stuff from home and on and on and on.

So we're not seeing a massive trend against the use of public transit nor we're hearing from our customers.

CameronDoerksen

Okay. No, that's very helpful.

And just a follow-up, I mean you mentioned the discussion you've had with in Canada. Are you able to maybe just drive in a little more detail how this infrastructure funding for green buses in Canada is going to work?

And when we might actually see that translate into some orders for you?

PaulSoubry

Well, we're obviously learning as it was rolled out; had the opportunity of speaking to minister McKenna and others, the people at the Canadian Infrastructure Bank, the premise and the theory and the strategy of the CIB is kind of goes as follows to just to make it as simple. They want to go to public transit agencies in Canada and say you operate a conventional fleet that cost you x, y, or z, you have future savings if you move to Zero Emission, in terms of maintenance costs, fuel costs, and so forth, and maybe even sparing ratios.

The Canadian Infrastructure Bank wants to be able to help operators finance the upfront purchase of electric or Zero Emission vehicles, electric or fuel cell, and then help them with the charge against the structure and therefore pay for the upfront money with the future savings and act as a facilitator. Now, this CIB hasn't been in the bus support game before, but they bring a lot of public private partnership, and a lot of project management experience.

And so look, it's fresh, and it's new, there's lots of interest in discussion. We're kind of a tale of two cities in Canada, we've got the bigger cities that have tried electric vehicles that understand what it means that are starting to get their vision clear on how and when and why and where they're going to charge them.

As opposed to some of the smaller cities that haven't yet done that. I don't expect a massive number of orders.

But I do expect to start to see some announcement associated with that, as we move into 2021.

StephenKing

And Paul, I just add, I guess that Canada obviously a great market for us on ZEBs, Vancouver, Toronto, Montreal, a lot of the big cities have New Flyer buses and service. And so obviously open to this Canadian Infrastructure Bank, but I think leaves us really well positioned like you said, for longer term.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Nauman Satti with Laurentian Bank.

NaumanSatti

Hey, good morning, everyone. And thanks for taking my questions.

So just going back to the covenant relief part, is that relief just for the first quarter? Or are you anticipating for Q2 next year in Q3 as well?

PaulSoubry

Well, thanks, Nauman. And thanks for calling in and appreciate you picking up coverage recently, think of the covenant relief as not the need for actual credit dollars or cash flow or liquidity.

It's more around the calculations. And as Pipasu and Steven both alluded to we're doing a little bit of preventative medicine here to make sure that we don't run into any of those challenges as we move through 2021 and 2022.

The term of the next agreement, Steven, that you're working with the banks as what kind of window associated with it.

StephenKing

Yes. So I think we're looking at longer term relief; I think obviously, when we did this the first time in April the world was a different place.

And nobody really knew what the impacts of COVID-19 were going to look like the longer term. So this time, we're going with the view of let's extend it a bit longer.

So kind of through 2021, we'd have this relief and then the covenants would come back, but it kind of stepped down levels to get us back to our path. As we mentioned, I mean, our trajectory is we still want to get to our target leverage of 2x to 2.5x.

But that's going to take time now, as we recover 2021 being a bit of a transition year, and then 2022 2023 getting back to pre COVID levels. So I think 2021 it's not just the first quarter I would say; we're looking at more kind of full year 2021 to have heightened covenant levels and some relief because of the trailing 2020 numbers.

And then 2022 getting back to kind of a more normal profile.

NaumanSatti

Okay, no, that's a great color. Thanks for that.

And just on the NFI Forward plan, I understand if I heard it correctly that you've consolidated some facilities in ADL from three to two, are there more factory consolidations that are in plan and if you could provide some color on there.

PaulSoubry

So far, here's what's happened. And you'll remember when we announced NFI Forward we had kind of business unit rationalization.

So that was New Flyer and MCI coming together that's effectively complete. We're now continuing to work on the combined org as well as the one system approach that will obviously give a lot more color in January on.

From a facility perspective or sorry, the other combined combination of businesses was the North American parts business of ADI and NFI parts. And that is well in process and that will be completed by the end of this year.

From a facility perspective, we've already got the UK dynamic from three production centers, if you will to two. We've already rationalized some of the fiberglass manufacturing sites.

Just this past year, we eliminated one of the sites in Winnipeg, and we're in the process of combining two left, the two of the facilities left and we want to take that down into one that will be completed by early 2021. And then we're in the process of looking at all of our other facilities in North America; we've got a project team that's deep into the study of that.

We've effectively provided some color in our calculation in our go forward plan of how much money we can think we can take out of the overhead. But there are no definitive decisions made yet on which facilities at what pace.

The other dynamics is we did shut down two service centers on the MCI side as the private market slowed down and effectively stalled. So Ian Smart and Christa were able to rationalize the Los Alamitos service center in California.

And we were also able to eliminate a service center in winter garden Florida. Those are now complete.

NaumanSatti

Okay, that's all very helpful. And maybe just last one from my end.

The motor coach segment. I mean, are you seeing any pricing pressures on the public side of this business, and just maybe how much customization goes into motor coaches because I'm assuming there's going to be a big inventory in the market or overall the market should be getting very competitive.

PaulSoubry

So a couple of things happened. First of all, the reflection or the dynamics in motor coach are kind of three different types.

First of all, when we sell a motor coach to a public operator, like New Jersey Transit or New York, those vehicles are highly customized, no different than a transit bus. They're usually obviously multi-year contracts with large orders, but they're highly customized.

When it comes to private operators, there's kind of two ends of the spectrum. The larger operators have their own unique specs, not just paint and delivery, and inside, but some level of customization.

So that's kind of one end of that spectrum. And in many cases, some of those are a little bit larger quantity and volume.

The other end of the spectrum is mostly configured orders, not customized. So think of it this way we offer a customer a vehicle that has this level of trim, or this level of interior, or this type of engine and those kinds of things.

And we build most of those buses, what we call fast tracks are effectively generic vehicles that we build, put an inventory and then do any final little customization for a customer. So your question about the demand.

Basically, as soon as COVID really hit, and there was locked downs and all kinds of restrictions, you had this massive dynamic of actually no orders. It's not as if pricing was crazy.

There weren't any orders. And that's why we effectively stopped the induction of new commercial vehicles and cease those.

And that's why we also liquidated the Pre-Owned coach pool because we don't know how deep and how long that pandemic is going to happen.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Jonathan Lamers with BMO Capital Markets.

JonathanLamers

Good morning. I'll bother you with a modeling question.

Do you have the production rates with you for North American transit and public sector motor coach lines for Q3 and Q4?

PaulSoubry

Sorry, you want to know the induction rate or the delivery rate?

JonathanLamers

The production rate at the plants? Before on recent calls, we talked about, I think, I believe in 85% of run rate - exit rate at the end of Q2 going into Q3?

PaulSoubry

Yes, I am not exactly sure I understand. We started the year with something like let's say on the North American MCI front of about 20 units a week and about two thirds of that are private customers and one third of that is public customers.

As we got into the third quarter, we stopped inducting commercial vehicles to the private. And we ended up continuing to operate on the public demand.

So our current build rate on motor coaches is somewhere around seven or eight vehicles a week. On the motor on the New Flyer side, we started the year at a production rate of somewhere around 55 vehicles a week.

And we are now operating at somewhere around 45 or so plus or minus. And of course, as you know, when you come to our facilities, that's also depend on whether they're 40 foot or 60 foot, which are two halves, which have a different impact on labor efficiency, but roughly 55 down to 45.

And that's the sustained rate we're working at right now. Does that help?

JonathanLamers

That's very helpful. I'm just trying to determine what's going on with the unit deliveries, they were way above my forecast for Q3, and they look like they're on track to be below for Q4.

I mean, you've explained the transactional coach side for Q4 well. Would you have with you how many units were delivered from Q2 inventory this year versus last year?

PaulSoubry

I'm not sure we have the kind of level of detail; we can try and help you work through. some of that stuff offline.

Think of it this way, the year has been not normal. Because we could build a bus, induct it, build it.

But depending on the customer acceptance and inspection, getting across the border or getting to our facilities, or in some cases, delegating self-inspection to us, and then we deliver it to the customer and they inspect on site has had quite a dramatic impact on the month to month, week to week actual delivery. So the cadence of inputs and outputs is quite out of whack this year.

JonathanLamers

Okay. And I know you've had a lot of...

PaulSoubry

But maybe offline, we can, maybe offline, Jonathan, we can help you with maybe a little more color as you try and think about evaluating and projecting the business. The good news for fourth quarter is we don't have to worry about selling a slot; we have to focus on just the constant execution.

And then the other dynamic around as we're now in second waves and we've got different levels of lockdowns, the customer inspection and the customer acceptance dynamic, and then the year maybe a little bit different than what we have experienced in the past.

StephenKing

I think, Paul, I just echo that comment, happy to chat. Otherwise, Jonathan offline, but I think as you mentioned, 2020 such a different year you've had the addition of ADL plus COVID.

Selling out of inventory, trying to finish whip during Q2, even more facilities were finished, that it makes it more difficult to do that what we used to be able to do kind of pre-ADL pre-MCI, when the business, you could really just do that inventory. I don't go through.

So it's definitely much more complicated in 2020, with a different production levels and different production levels, at different site, and for different markets.

JonathanLamers

Okay. And just circling back to Paul's comments about the new public funding measures that were approved on the ballots recently, representing, I believe you said up to $38 billion.

I know it's hard to generalize the wide range of different measures out there. But were those generally for operating budgets or capital budgets?

And how positive do you see that being for the active Bid Universe?

PaulSoubry

I'm going to say, Jonathan, is probably too early to tell what we see obviously is the headlines from not only our customers and what the details of that were on the ballot agendas, but also the summaries from the trade associations. A couple of pieces of commentary, a lot of these are effectively taxes that are then applied for multi years or in perpetuity around a fuel tax or a sales tax or a gas tax or some kind of a dynamic in each of those locations.

Most of them are kind of a percent levy. And they're not specifically defined, whether they're capital or operating costs.

Our perspective is net-net anything that benefits the public transit agency from the cash flow in their business, ultimately allows them to rejuvenate their fleets, or to think about op costs versus capital costs. The other thing that I'll point out is, as we looked at that list, a; was on the ballot and whatever 97% in the past and b; is that they're actually quite well diverse across America.

I mean, they range from Seattle to Portland to Denver to California to the East Coast. And so when we talk to our trade associations, again, all of our operators are going through hell.

But net-net, there seems to be a really positive sentiment from the American public around the desire to want to push public transit and green public transit. I'm not sure I can give you any color yet on how that translates into an actual Bid Universe for 2021.

Obviously, as we get into our Investor Day, we'll do some more research and try and tell that story to give a little bit more color of quantum or whether it's capital or operating costs, net-net I think it's very positive.

StephenKing

And Paul, maybe I'll just mention one thing because we didn't mention it earlier. Yesterday, Senate Appropriations 2021.

So there's discussion, obviously, the FAST Act was extended for a year, but getting funding was only extended till December of this year, but the act extension was until September 2021. Now there's a strong appetite to pass a bill that would fund the FAST Act for till next year.

So that's another positive step, in addition to all the approvals coming out of the election, and the President Elect's view on funding for public transit, it looks like there's an appetite for to fund and pass the bill before December 11. That would fund the FAST Act for another year.

PaulSoubry

Well, in fact, Steven, the Transportation and Housing Appropriations bill that you described in the senate yesterday, is not only extending it until September of next year, but it's a plus up over current funding of $570 million. So a very, very strong indication.

And of course, this is the senate. Right.

So it's not necessarily aligned with the next administration, very positive for us.

JonathanLamers

Maybe one follow-up question on that commentary. I appreciate all that.

Based on the existing level of FAST Act funding, would you see industry volumes returning to 6,000 units per year eventually once the customers are stabilized?

PaulSoubry

Speculation on my part, Jonathan, but yes, I do. if you just take the 85,000 transit buses in North America today in operation, you look at the average age of that fleet, which is somewhere around eight years plus or minus, given the slowdown in buys this year, it'll only move up a little bit, given the desire and the interest in funding and the funding associated with Zero Emission.

Our view is that, yes, that 6,000 is definitely attainable. It won't be in 2021 is my view.

But we're going to start to see recovery. At this point in time, we do not have a really good forecast of actual deliveries for 2020.

But my guess is this going to be a couple thousand down from the 6,000 level, once all the dust settles. But I do think we're going back to that level.

Operator

Our final question comes from the line of Daryl Young with TD Securities.

DarylYoung

Good morning, guys. Just one quick one for me with respect to electric buses and some of the pilot programs that have been going on across the US; obviously, a lot of distraction this year.

But just curious if there's been any major takeaways because I think some of them have now been in operation for a year plus in terms of timing of orders, and major takeaways on competitors or anything like that.

PaulSoubry

Well, the timing of orders as we highlighted, and you can see the notes in our materials, Daryl, around the percentage of our active as well as the percentage of the total Bid Universe that is Zero Emission. Clearly, it's almost a factor of two of what we saw last year.

So the interest and attention is definitely there. A couple of takeaways from a technical or a spec or a scoping dynamic.

First, if you have to go back a couple years in our perspective, we and most of the industry thought that we would have batteries, a small battery quantity on a bus. So we'd have charging throughout the infrastructure.

In the last year and a half that clearly has shifted to more operators wanting to have less on route charging as a concept and more depo charging, so they have much more flexibility in operation. The other challenge or the other learning, the other deployment dynamic is how important the charging infrastructure strategy and partnership relates to the bus sale.

We can point to a number of situations where we sold a bus the operator took responsibility for the charging, deployment hasn't gone all that well, communication dynamics, electronics and so forth. And so this only reinforces what Chris' team is doing is getting closer and closer to the customer of offering vehicles and charging solutions as a bundled-up offering.

In addition, it provides the operator with a single let's call it belly button or single person to work with to make sure it's optimum. The third thing I'll point to is that we've gone in and out of the fuel cell dynamic.

You may remember back in 2010, we did a bunch of fuel cells for the Vancouver Olympics, the fuel cell was the propulsion mover was big is expensive, maintenance was complex and so forth. We then kind of pivoted well, it's got to be a battery electric world, I would say in the last year, or two, or three.

And again, Chris' guys will tell us a story of the January Investor Day. But the concept now is a fuel cell being a range extender.

So it's a battery electric bus, you've got a much smaller fuel cell, some onboard hydrogen that allows you to keep topping up the batteries, which then allows the operator way more flexibility on range. And so that's now the days of saying it's electric bus.

And only electric bus solution is clearly past us. And fuel cell has its place for many operators, depending on their geography, their temperature, their typography, and so on, and so forth.

And so what you'll see at our Investor Day is discussion around a; one size doesn't fit all but b; every customer will have a different dynamic based on their political environment, their funding environment, their technical aptitude, their history with fuel cells, battery, electric hybrids, or whatever. And I think that the trick for us, and the success that we've had is that we can actually offer all of those variants to our customer, depending on their unique need.

And we've got lots of case studies where we'll have a political environment come and say, well, what's the range of your bus? And we'll say, well, it depends on so many factors that in many cases, the onboard energy uses a disproportionate amount of energy for HVAC or heating or cooling or whatever.

And this goes back into terms of that deep working with an operator in terms of a solution unique to their operation, which also then means somebody showing up with a vehicle and just trying to sell the vehicle is really at a disadvantage as opposed to that integrated solution.

Operator

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I will now turn the call back over to Stephen King to close remarks.

Stephen King

All right, thanks, Amy. And thanks everyone for joining us this morning.

We look forward to speaking with you all again at our January Investor Day. And so I'll just remind everyone, that'll be Monday, January 11th 2021.

And information will be available on our website, and we'll send up the agenda for that session in December. Thank you.

Have a great day.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating.

You may now disconnect.