Thanks. Good evening, everyone, and thank you for joining this call.

We will begin with an overview of the industry. Looking at the year gone by, Nifty 50 ended down 5%.

Through the year, markets had to deal with multiple challenges/news flows: global uncertainty around tariffs and trade, geopolitical tensions leading to volatility in crude oil prices, et cetera. On top of this, we saw persistent FPI outflows, which kept sentiment under pressure.

Overall, a fairly difficult environment for markets. What clearly stood out was the continued participation of domestic investors.

Despite the volatility, they not only stayed invested, but continued to repose their confidence in long-term India growth story and markets. In fact, many used this corrective phase as an opportunity to allocate more prudently and systematically rather than getting carried away by short-term market movements.

Interestingly, if we look at the March quarter, the Nifty 50 was down by 14.5%. The flows into equity-oriented funds came in at around ₹1,340 billion compared to ₹1,188 billion in December of 2025 quarter, when Nifty in fact was up by 6%.

SIP flows continued to inch up at a healthy pace. In March 2026, monthly SIP collections touched an all-time high of ₹321 billion, up 24% year-on-year, with 97 million contributing accounts.

For the full year, the industry across asset classes saw healthy net inflows of ₹7.4 trillion. Equity-oriented funds continued to be the primary driver, contributing close to ₹4.9 trillion.

ETFs witnessed strong inflows of about ₹1.8 trillion, of which gold and silver ETFs combined attracted nearly ₹1 trillion. On the fixed income side, flows were relatively muted.

Debt-oriented funds saw inflows of ₹66 billion, liquid funds saw inflows of ₹5 billion during the year. Let me highlight an interesting data point here.

This marks 14th consecutive financial year of positive net inflows for the industry as a whole. Another important trend is growth in number of mutual fund investors.

It's not just deeper wallet share from existing set of investors, but also steady addition to new investors driving industry growth. During the year, 7.2 million new investors entered mutual funds, taking the total investor base to 61.4 million.

Participation from B30 locations also remains encouraging, with over 40% of SIP flows now coming from these markets. We now move to us.

Overall QAAUM grew by 20% YoY to reach ₹9.3 trillion, while equity-oriented AUM reached ₹6 trillion. SIP and STP flows together stood at ₹48.8 billion in March of 2026, growing by 33% year-on-year.

Our total accounts crossed 30 million, and unique investors with us are now at 16.7 million, an addition of 3.5 million over the year. To put that in context, industry as a whole added 7.2 million.

In terms of mix, direct plans continue to gain traction and now account for about 31% of our equity AUM. Digital adoption remains very strong, with 97% of our transactions being digital.

To zoom in, this number was 81% 3 years back and 69% 6 years back. During the year, we further strengthened our mutual fund offerings with launch of seven new schemes.

Beyond mutual funds, we also made good progress in expanding our alternatives business with announcement of first close of our private credit fund with IFC as a partner and anchor investor. In our international business based out of GIFT City, we launched two inbound funds during the year, taking the total now to five.

On portfolio management services side, we are seeing encouraging traction. We were awarded two marquee mandates during the year: one was from EPFO and the second one is from SPFO, the Siemens Provident Fund Organization, both on fixed income.

Now we move to financials. Total revenue for the year was ₹46.2 billion, with revenue from operations at ₹41.2 billion, growth of 18% year-on-year.

Total expenses were ₹9.1 billion. Operating profit for the year came in at ₹32.1 billion, a YoY growth of 18%, with an operating margin at 35 basis points of AUM.

Profit after tax stood at ₹28.6 billion, a year-on-year growth of 16%. Board earlier today recommended a dividend of ₹54 per share compared to ₹45 per share, adjusted for bonus issuance last year.

That translates to a payout ratio of 81%. Of course, this is subject to shareholder approval.

Thank you very much. We can open up for questions starting now.

Good evening to the team. I have two questions.

My first question to Mr. Munot is what are the key priorities for HDFC AMC in the coming quarters?

How do you plan to bring more retail investors into mutual funds, strengthen distribution in smaller cities, and leverage digital platforms to make investing simpler and more engaging? Would love to hear your insights on this.

That's my first question, and I'll ask my second question after this. Thank you.

Sure. Thank you, Suchit.

As you can see, over the last couple of years, industry has grown from strength to strength. For the last couple of years, we are seeing tremendous focus on expanding the systematic book across all channels, across all geographies, across all investor segments.

While the industry has grown, we have got our fair share. We continue to focus on that, continue to serve investors across various channels through the physical branch network that we have, where we have significantly expanded in last couple of years, and we will continue to evaluate opportunities on that side.

On the other side, continue to invest in our digital capabilities. Both the portal, website, as well as the app are best-in-class in the industry.

If you look at the transactions which used to be almost 40% physically done 5, 6 years back are almost now 97% or so get done digitally. We believe in what I call "phygital": continue to expand our physical base to serve our distributors, our investors across the country, and on the other side, best-in-class digital capabilities to serve our investors.

On the product side, as per the SEBI classification, most of the categories that a mutual fund house can have, we are present in all of those categories. Our aspiration is to keep growing our market share in all of those categories, keep delivering good returns to the investors.

They have more faith, and then we get more money in those products. On the other side, continue to build our distribution capability.

Over the next several years, apart from the mutual funds, we also see opportunities to grow the non-mutual fund side of the business, which includes our PMS capabilities. We had some early wins as well as on the alternative side.

In the initial comments, Simal has mentioned about what we are doing on the private credit side, on the Category II AIF, on the fund of funds side. Over a period of time, you will hear more from us on that side.

The other opportunity I will highlight is on the international business. We have a 100% wholly-owned subsidiary in GIFT City, where we have five funds live over a period of time.

We want to continue to build the product range and the distribution capability on that side, both for inbound money from global investors investing into India and outbound, Indian investors investing globally. I would say that we'll continue to focus.

Thank you. My second question to Mr.

Sirwalla is how are you approaching risks such as market volatility or any regulatory compliances that keeps on changing over the time, and rising costs while still ensuring profitability remains steady and growth keeps on going from the company?

Sure, I'll take the cost question first. If you break down our cost essentially into two components: employee costs and all other expenses together.

On the employee cost front, excluding ESOPs, our cost has grown by about 12.5% year-on-year. If you take this over the last 5 years, the CAGR for employee cost, again ex ESOPs, non-cash charge, is around 13%.

During that period, our employee count has grown from 1,250 to around 1,700 employees. Similarly, on the non-employee costs, they have increased at a CAGR of about 13.5% over the last 5 years.

While we don't give specific guidance, these will broadly grow in line with the business and the investments we are making across technology and people. Again, if we step back and look at costs relative to AUM over the last few years, there has been a clear downward trend.

Despite investing in talent, building new capabilities, and factoring long-term investment initiatives like stock options, we have improved overall efficiency. I think the focus is not necessarily cutting costs, but on managing them well while we continue to invest for growth.

I think on risk management and volatility, of course, we have a team that ensures that they have the appropriate risk factors in place, and we sort of manage that very, very actively across our compliance and risk team.

Thank you, and best wishes.

Hello?

Yes, please.

My question was on the EPFO and SPFO mandates that you said that the AMC received. Is there any data on that?

SPFO, that we have already started managing. EPFO, we are signing the agreement.

Both of them were part of RFP that was issued, and both of these were awarded to us.

Okay. Okay.

Okay.

No, that's all right.

Thank you.

Hi. Am I audible?

Yes.

Oh, okay, sir. Sir, my question is regarding the market share.

How do you see HDFC AMC growing its market share over the next few quarters, and what exactly are you planning to do to gain further market share in this industry, sir?

As I mentioned earlier that we have a good long-term track record across all strategies. On the other side, the work that we have been doing on the distribution side, and given the product range, the performance track record, the platform that we have, over a period of time, we want optimized market share across all products.

Incrementally, what I mentioned earlier on both what we are doing on physical presence, relationships with all channels, be it our mutual fund distributors, tens of thousands of them across the country, all the national distributors, the aggregators, all the banks where we have relationship, and of course, the fintech channel, which has been growing quite a bit over the last couple of years. We continue to focus on each one of them.

I think some of the other things I have mentioned earlier.

Sir, one last question, sir.

Sorry.

Sir, how do you think artificial intelligence tools are going to affect the mutual fund industry, and how do you see, going ahead, the role of mutual fund distributor in raising up the AUM for any AMC? Do you think there is any chance of disruption from AI or any Claude plugins or that, sir?

Anything which you see coming for the mutual fund industry, maybe from the B2B side or maybe from the B2C side? Do you see anything like that?

Our digital strategy is organized around becoming the digital AI value creator for every Indian. Our overall mission as an organization is to be the value creator for every Indian, and the digital strategy is to be digital AI value creator for every Indian.

Clear focus on three stakeholders: our investors, our distribution partners, and the HDFC Group ecosystem. The approach is not to merely adopt technology, but to use it to strengthen our scale, our efficiency, our investor experience.

I mentioned earlier that 97% of the transactions are already digital, but with the help of AI and all the digital tools, we continue to simplify our onboarding, our discovery, our engagement to drive the long-term participation from everyone rather than just the transactional usage. We are clearly on a trajectory towards becoming a 100% digital transaction AMC.

Across the organization, AI is being embedded as an operating layer, from marketing and client engagement to investment processes, risk management, compliance, and it's acting as a force multiplier for our teams rather than a replacement. This allows faster decision-making, it allows better risk oversight, and of course, higher productivity.

All of this is built on a robust and cloud-based technology foundation. We are very particular about a strong data architecture and a very, very rigorous cybersecurity standards.

To summarize, I would say the objective is clear: to build scalable, defensible digital and AI capabilities that enhance the investor outcome, improve operating leverage, and create a durable long-term competitive moat for HDFC AMC. We have announced today that board has approved the appointment of Mr.

Rajan Anandan as an invitee and external expert on the technology committee for a 3-year term. Mr.

Anandan is currently a managing director at Peak XV Partners, he brings a deep global technology leadership experience. He's worked earlier with and has led Google in India and Southeast Asia.

He had senior roles at Microsoft and Dell and was a partner at McKinsey. I think this strengthens the board's technology oversight and provides an independent and high-quality guidance as our endeavor is to deepen our focus on digital and AI-led transformation.

Good evening, everyone. I hope I'm audible.

My first question was to pick up from the opening remarks on investor behavior, especially in March. Broadly, given the volatility in the preceding year, we don't see any major change in trends on the reported numbers.

Maybe under the hood, have you seen any change in behavior in terms of ticket sizes or let's say self-directed customers, their share kind of coming down in overall flows? Anything that you can highlight beyond the reported numbers?

I'm sure you have seen the March industry flow data, and the numbers really speak for themselves. If you look at the book at the start of the year versus now, in the context of how markets have behaved, what Simal touched upon earlier, one thing is quite clear that domestic households are increasingly investing with a long-term mindset, and they are beginning to appreciate the benefits of rupee-cost averaging.

In fact, feedback from all the distribution partners I engage with, it clearly suggests that many investors are comfortable with market corrections because it allows them to accumulate more units. Credit to our industry campaigns, credit to our regulator, credit to all the distribution partners on the ground and the whole ecosystem that more and more investors are looking at testing in a disciplined manner with more long-term orientation.

Interesting part, I was looking at the data today that, if I remember correctly, highest flows in equity and equity-oriented funds, hybrid funds, have come in the month of March, where we had significant global geopolitical volatility. The other month where we had higher flows was in the month of July, when India got hit with additional tariffs by US.

That clearly shows that in extreme volatility and when markets were not doing well, the Nifty and the other indices were down, investors used that an opportunity to put more money to work. That clearly shows a very mature behavior of investors.

During the year, SIP book of the industry has grown by ₹6,000 crores. You would have seen our number on the systematic book, the way it has grown during the year.

I think that gives us quite a bit of comfort. I would still say on the cautionary note that we have to see the investor behavior if markets stay under pressure for a much longer period.

While over the last 18 months or so, we have seen good volatility, and investors have behaved in a highly mature manner, but it is always tested over time. For now, I can say the trend is clearly encouraging.

Got it. Just one small follow-up, Munot, there.

Would you say that this contrarian approach is true across both the assisted as well as the self-directed channel, or is there a marked difference between the two?

I think across both, yeah, across. You can see the way number of contributing accounts have increased during the year on the SIP side.

At the beginning of the year, there were 81 million SIP contributing accounts that AMFI publishes, and that number closed at 97.2 million as of March '26. There is an increase of 16 million accounts.

As you mentioned in the opening remarks that this year markets have not done well.

Got it. I had one question when I look at the share of HDFC Bank in the mix of equity AUM, that has kind of come down.

Any thoughts on that number, please?

The bank share in the distribution pie decreasing, I don't think that's the right way of looking at it. What we are seeing is broad-based growth across all our distribution channels.

I mentioned in the beginning itself that we are focused on all channels that includes all the banks, national distributors, our mutual fund distributors, fintechs, direct, all the registered advisors, et cetera. It's really a case of the overall opportunity expanding rather than any other channel losing out.

HDFC Bank remains a very important partner for us, and the potential within that channel is very significant. We continue to work very closely with the bank, and there is clear alignment at the top.

All my interactions with Shashi and team reinforces that point. There are changes that take time to place through, but we are confident that results will follow.

That HDFC Bank has always followed an open architecture approach. This occasionally results in event-driven or seasonal variation, particularly in quarters when peers launch a large NFO and the parent bank is actively involved, that can lead to shorter movement in the flow market share.

Importantly for us, particular thing that we monitor closely is the quality of flows and the SIP share through the bank. That continues to remain strong and which is what will build the durable AUM over a period of time.

I should also mention about the relationship with HDFC Securities. The share of flow with the HDFC Securities continue to remain very encouraging.

Overall, I remain very constructive on the opportunity it presents over medium to long term.

Got it. Just one small data point question.

It's possible to give some sense on what could be the contribution of flows or SIP from fintech players? That will be all.

Thank you.

Contribution of SIPs from fintechs you are saying? Abhijit, you are asking for total

Yes, on a flow basis, how much money is comes from those set of guys.

We can get back to you with this data point.

Sure. Thank you.

Hi, good evening. Sorry, I missed a little bit of your call because your sister concern had a call running parallely.

If you've not given, can you spell out the asset class-wise yields? This quarter, I think on a blended basis, yields are slightly down.

Is that mainly because of mix, or is there some internal sort of change in the yield? That would be my first question.

Second, on expenses, admin and other opex has seen a slight increase, nothing too big, but what sort of run rate are we looking at over here? Yep, and also on your flow versus book market share, how has that trended in 4Q?

Are we sort of broadly flow share is beating book share? Those would be my three questions.

Thanks.

Sure, Madhukar. On the yields for the different classes: equity was around 56 basis points, debt 28, and liquid 13.

Blended for the year was 45. There is actually no yield compression in the quarter.

This quarter, the Q4 is a 90-day quarter, and Q3 is a 92-day quarter. That if you simply divide without adjusting for number of days, then you may have come to that number.

The yields are flat of some.

Got it.

Madhukar, just one thing, this 56 of equity that Naozad touched upon, that includes equity index funds. If you take that out, if you look at only actively managed equity and equity-oriented, it is 60, 61 basis points.

That's right.

Okay.

On your third question on expenses, it's just BAU. It's up by 7%, I really don't know There's no

No, I was looking at it more on a quarter-over-quarter basis.

So Quarter-on-quarter, other expenses up 8%. So

In absolute terms?

Absolute terms, it's a really small number.

It's not too big. So

It's up by ₹5 crores.

Nothing special.

Madhukar, even the CSR and all these things, no, because those things which are linked directly like a royalty CSR, they are linked with our profits, revenues. As that goes up, by defaults, these are mandatory/statutory expenses.

In absolute

I would say, Madhukar, that we have always said that we run a very tight ship, very, very tight ship. Look at our expense as a basis point of our AUM.

We would be one of the best run, not only in India, but in the world. We are in a growth business, and I would emphasize we are at very early stage of financialization of savings in India.

We want to make the most of the opportunity which lies ahead. We are expanding our footprint on the physical side.

We are expanding our digital capabilities, the investment in AI, in our investment capability, product capability. We're very excited from a long-term perspective on the alternatives.

It requires upfront investment in terms of the kind of talent we have got onboarded on the PMS, the kind of talent we have onboarded, on the international side, the setup that we have put in place. All of this will result in the business over a period of time, but we shouldn't shy away from investing in all of these opportunities.

Yep, no, that point is taken. It's also a very small change.

It's not a very

Madhukar, given the scale of our business, few crores here and there,

yeah,

be it investing, be it technology, be it in people, these are foundational blocks for long-term growth. Should not shy away from that, yeah.

Yep. The flow versus book market share, and then also, if I can add in one more question, see, I think it seems that you're going a little bit slower on the entire SIF launch.

What are your thoughts over there, and when should we expect sort of any action over there? Sort of your build up on alternatives, if you could give some commentary around that.

Yeah. As book.

Overall flows are higher than the book share, that much I can tell you. We remain focused, as I said, across all products, across all channels, across all geographies, and we continue to remain focused on that.

On your question on SIF, we have secured all necessary regulatory approvals. From our standpoint, getting the approval is just the starting point.

Real question is, how do we participate in a way that is consistent with our philosophy? For us, that means being very clear on two things: one, the product has to be investment-led; and two, it has to solve for a genuine client need rather than just occupy shelf space.

We are not approaching this as a race. In a category like this, being early doesn't necessarily create an advantage.

In fact, the first few products will end up shaping investor expectations for the entire segment. We would much rather be thoughtful and deliberate, and that has always been our view on all products.

The good part is we are not starting from scratch, right? We already have the underlying capabilities.

What capabilities are needed? You need investment management capability, you need risk management capability, and you need product management capability.

Of course, on the other side, we have the best distribution capability. The team is working on designing couple of products in this space, which are differentiated.

In terms of impact, I would view this as more strategic than immediate. It's not going to move the needle overnight.

The category itself will take time to develop, and investor understanding will have to build. Over a period of time, having a well-thought-out SIF offering becomes important if you want to be seen as a complete investment platform.

We have always mentioned we want to be the one-stop solution provider. The product will be there, but we have always been more thoughtful and deliberate and will always be.

Got it. Understood.

All the best, sir.

Thank you, Madhukar.

Hi. Thank you for the opportunity.

My first question is on the regulatory change with respect to TERs. I'm sorry if I'm asking the question again maybe, but if you can just help us with any update on how are you looking at the changes in TERs and whether you have kind of gone into any negotiations with the distributors?

That would be my first question. Second is if I look at the unique investor market share that has increased to around 27%, could you give some color on particularly which geographies are driving this market share acquisition and through which channels would be kind of the major driver?

Third question would lastly be on whether you are planning to come out with any NFOs in future.

On the new TER regulations that you asked, we have a new terminology in the industry now. It's called BER, the base expense ratio.

It is still early days, and you will hear more from us over time on how we propose to deal with the impact, including changes in distribution commission, our margins, and the overall impact on the ecosystem. This time the impact is on select few schemes.

Larger strategies are the ones seeing the impact, and smaller strategies are even seeing some degree of mark-up. Let me break this into two parts: one on the existing book, and the other one on the new flows.

Starting with the existing book, for us, the gross impact is about 3 to 4 basis points, and our approach is to largely offset this through optimization of commission structures along with prudent management of both the direct as well as indirect costs. Overall, the targeted impact on our P&L should not be material.

I know the obvious question is around quantification of the same, but still early for us to give a precise number. Having said that, you would appreciate we have navigated similar changes in the past, and I would point you to look at how we have managed outcomes over time.

Second part is coming on the flows. Coming to flows, there are a couple of changes here as well.

Firstly, the earlier 5 basis points available in lieu of exit load is now removed, which is a straight reduction. Secondly, there is a shift in the structure post April 1, 2026.

Earlier it was TER, which including GST on distribution commission and other expenses, while GST on management fees was in addition to TER, whereas now we move to a base expense ratio framework with GST kept completely outside of TER. Yes, we will need to make suitable adjustment to ensure margins evolve in line with our expectations.

Thanks, sir. That answers the question.

Secondly, on the unique investor market share increase, what would be the kind of geographies driving? Would be the Tier 2, Tier 3 markets, and what would be the channel through which these customers are largely coming in?

We get money from almost 98% or so of zip codes from the country. The share of new investors I think have been coming from almost all geographies.

The B30 towns, as the parlance in our industry, beyond the top 30 towns, have been adding a lot of new investors, and we have been a beneficiary of that. The fintech is the channel where a lot of new accounts on the SIP side getting opened up, where we have a very decent share.

Of course, all the other channels continue to see expansion of new unique investors.

Okay. Are you planning out for any NFOs in the near future?

We look at some product gap, but overall, if you look at our product bouquet, portfolio is fairly well-rounded. We are present across most of the key categories, there isn't a need to keep adding products for the sake of it.

I think the bigger opportunity for us actually is within the existing lineup. There are funds which have delivered steady, consistent outcome for decades, but haven't necessarily been in the top bracket in terms of visibility and the AUM that they have.

A lot of our effort is going into sharpening these and moving them up the curve. On the new launches, will stay very selective.

If you do something in the thematic or sector space, or in the passive space, it will be backed by strong conviction from the investment team and a clear market opportunity. Otherwise, we are quite comfortable with the portfolio that we have.

Beyond, as I mentioned earlier, beyond mutual funds, from an overall platform perspective, we continue to expand on the PMS, AIF, international, GIFT City, all of those opportunities to cater to a wider set of client needs.

Got it, sir. Thank you so much.

Thank you.

Hi. Thank you so much for the opportunity.

I wanted to understand flow market share qualitatively. While I understand we have a robust track record of investment performance, but our calculations suggest that in Q4, the flow market share has been lower than the flow market share that was in Q3.

Can you help us understand the reasons behind it?

No, I don't think so. How are you arriving at that?

No, actually, you would have missed the dividend payout. See, most of our schemes pay out dividend in the last quarter.

You would have taken dividend payouts as redemptions. IDCW in the way it is now called.

Right. The

investors who have subscribed for the IDCW scheme, for them, that would have led to your computation, but that's not the data point.

Understood. Second question was in terms of the performance of schemes in 1-year bucket.

Actually, except mid-cap and value category within the equity-oriented schemes, the scheme performance and the rank of HDFC AMC among the industry players has deteriorated. Can you help me understand what was the reason behind it and how are we trying to improve the performance?

Not at this. In fact, we continue to be in top two quartiles across most of the categories, across time periods, including longer-term performance.

Large number of [funds are rated?] 4 and 5 star by Value Research.

As I said, flow market share remains better than the book market share. The team is clearly amongst the most experienced in the top tier.

The investment philosophy or style has stood test of time since delivered best-in-class performance over a long period of time. There is enough and more data now available on the flows, and that does suggest continuing trend in our favor.

Honey, let me leave you with one thing. Investors as well as distributors, they don't look at fund performance over one or two quarters.

As you move right on the timeline graph, we stand out clearly. There is more and more appreciation of a long-term track record of alpha generation across our strategies.

If I remember correctly, 12 or 13 of our funds have got a track record over 15 years, and several of them going back 20 or 25 or 30-year plus track record of alpha generation. Investors, distributors, they all appreciate the kind of long-term track record that we have got.

Understood. Thank you so much.

Just the last clarifying question. You highlighted that the impact on yields on two fronts: existing book and new flows.

Existing book, you highlighted that there will not be any material impact, and on new flows, you said that 5 basis point in lieu of exit load. Overall, on new flows, there will be 5 basis point impact, is what

No. The earlier 5 basis point available in lieu of exit load is now removed, so that will be a straight reduction from the distribution commission, right, because this was paid out as the commission.

Okay.

Yeah. The new commissions that we have published factors that into account, and thereby we have kind of come out with new commission structure, which is lower to that much an extent.

Understood. There is overall no material impact on P&L.

That is what we are striving for.

Okay. Thank you so much, sir, for answering my questions.

Thank you.

Hi. Just one question.

If you look at the top three schemes for us, they account for a significant portion of our AUM, equity side probably closer to above 50% of equity plus hybrid put together. Given that the smaller schemes would have relatively more advantage in the new TER structures, do you think that that can be a strategy for us where we kind of push these more, smaller-sized schemes to kind of protect our yields as well, and also from a diversification of AUM perspective?

Advantage to whom, Prayesh? It is advantageous to investors.

We exist for our investors. Given the telescopic pricing, as the scheme becomes bigger, you have a lower TER and that much of additional returns baked in for the investor.

I feel very happy for them. Over a period of time, I think people underappreciate this aspect.

One, if you look at the long-term track record of larger schemes, I think that has been outstanding. On the other side, as the impact from the telescopic pricing, investors tend to gain.

Ultimately, the fate of our industry is decided by the investors. If they make better returns, good for us.

Okay. The other question was on the yields on the AIF and the PMS book, if you could spell that out for us, it's kind of easier for us to think about what kind of incremental revenue contribution that can come in from these two products over the next few years.

On the alternative business, marginal premium to our equity margins. On the PMS side, pure discretionary is in line with equity margins.

The non-discretionary, particularly the EPFO and SPFO kind, these are Government of India

entities,

mandates, and among the most prestigious and very tightly contested opportunities. We are honored to have been selected.

That said, this is a segment that operates under very, very tight economics. Right.

When you say these are the net yields, right, ex of distribution expense received? Right.

Just on the guidance on expense growth for FY27 and '28, anything that you can guide on what kind of expense growth we should look at on an absolute basis, that would be great.

We don't give out guidance generally, and I think I said it on one of the previous questions that if you look at our last 5-year CAGR of employee cost and other expenses, it's been around the 13% mark. I think you heard Navneet also say that we focus on costs at the same time.

We are mindful of the opportunity ahead of us in terms of growth, and we'll keep investing around it. There's no specific guidance which we generally give out on costs.

Got that. In last question, any color that you want to give?

Is there any change? Because obviously March data was good and probably was because of some rollover effect of February.

Any color on how the SIP book has been progressing and also any difference between how the direct channel versus the assisted channel is kind of seen differential trends between the SIPs that they are generating?

I mentioned earlier, I gave the numbers in terms of the SIP contributing accounts. We started the year at 81 million in March '25 and closed the year at 97.2 million.

Increase of 16 million accounts in a year where markets were down. In the last quarter of the financial year, where we had significant volatility, particularly in the month of March, and we not only closed with highest-ever SIP monthly flow, but we also had relatively higher the overall flow into equity and equity-oriented funds.

That just reflects the maturity of individual investors, there is more stickiness of investor behavior and reinforces the long-term nature of SIP participation. We are seeing that across both direct as well as distributor-led.

Over a longer period of time, I think AMFI has published this data sometime back that the longevity of investors has been greater with those who have come through distributors because there's more hand-holding versus the direct investors. In last couple of years, we have seen very significant increase in investors who have invested directly.

Last couple of quarters, notwithstanding the volatility, numbers have been encouraging, but we have to observe that trend over a longer period of time. We, as a house and as an industry, as a large player in the industry, continue to focus a lot on investor awareness campaigns, both physically and digitally.

In fact, as a house, we have been very passionate about investor education campaigns across the country, and keep highlighting to investors that rupee-cost averaging works in your favor. Think long term, don't get swayed by the volatility, stay true to your goals, focus on the goals rather than the short-term market movement.

I think, yeah, those efforts are really paying off. We hope that investors will continue to maintain this disciplined way of investing.

Thank you so much.

Thanks for the opportunity. Most of my questions have been answered, but it was very heartening to hear the feedback on how investors have behaved in March.

Just wanted to understand, is there some color around where the lump sum flows or the additional flows that came in during March or during the market correction, was it from new investors or existing investors putting in more money into the existing portfolios? If you could give some color there, that would be helpful.

Thank you.

Sure. In fact, interesting part is a larger part of flows into equity and equity-oriented funds are coming in the form of SIPs, and they are relatively more sticky.

Predicting lump sum flows have not been easy, and there is some, I would say, variability in that. The interesting trend that I talked about earlier that two particular months where there was volatility and more FPI selling, I think it was month of July last calendar year and the month of March in '26, both the months saw higher flows on a relative basis versus I think it was May last year where FPIs turned buyers and markets were volatile, but were better, and we saw lower flows.

Maybe there is a contrarian behavior among the investors who are investing in a lump sum manner, trying to take advantage when market is down while waiting on the sidelines or booking a little bit of profit when market is up.

Understood. That's helpful.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Hi, good evening, sir. Just two questions from my side.

First, you quantified the impact of this new base TER and other regulations at a gross level and also the strategies in terms of distributor commission cuts that you might undertake going ahead. Just wanted to understand that you also mentioned that other non-distributor costs and other overheads also that you can manage.

Just wanted to understand, is there a thought process around your RTA payouts and when do these renegotiations really happen, and do you think that at least for the next 2 to 3-year perspective, there is any scope or headroom available on that side to curtail cost? The second question was on the unique investor count.

Obviously, your market share has expanded rapidly and it kind of showcases maybe a lot of new customers coming in through the fintech channels, given that they are probably the largest originators of new customers. Now given this current market downturn and maybe the ongoing pain in the broader Indian equities over the last many quarters now, two things: one is how is the customer wallet really divided between different players on this platform?

Have you guys done any study on that? Second is in terms of the customer behavior during this current downturn, any difference between the more assisted channels and let's say the DIY sort of channels out there?

Those were my questions.

A couple of questions. First, on the expenses on the fund side.

I think I've mentioned in the context of operating expenses of the AMC that we run a very tight ship. I can say the same about the fund expenses also.

We try to optimize it for our investors across all the costs that we have while ensuring that they get best-in-class service. Won't comment more on that.

The second question was on the way we have been adding the unique investors. From the presentation, you can see that the penetration, which was 17.6% in March '23, has gone up to 27% in March '26.

Over the last three financial years, we would have added almost 10 million investors, 1 crore new unique investors in the fund house. It's been a very interesting, good journey for us.

I think reflection of the investment performance, reflection of all the investments that we have been making on the distribution side, and of course, the reflection of the brand and the franchise. We continue to remain focused on that.

Your other question was on fintech as a channel, right, our share in the fintech.

Yes. Yes, the question was more on, let's say, the wallet share of a customer, how that would be divided between you and other players when they're deciding on, let's say, allocation through the fintech channel.

In that regard, also how their behavior has been versus, let's say, the assisted channels during this downturn.

As I said, that our flow share through the fintech channel is also higher than the book share. That reflects, I think a strong presence on their platforms.

Our folios also, I think this year we have moved up from 2.3 crore folios to 3 crore folios. So 70 lakh folios have got added in last 1 year or so.

While we have added around 35 lakh new investors, every investor is, on an average, investing in more than one product of ours.

Sorry, but if you can give some color on the customer behavior on this channels versus, let's say, the assisted channels in, let's say, the last 2 or 3 months?

Sure. In 2 and 3 months, it will be really difficult.

We can only look at the data at our end, and when you get an opportunity to ask some of these guys. See, they have added very large number of new investors to the industry in last 4 or 5 years.

I think in FY20, the number of investors coming through the fintechs would have been less than a million, and that number is now multiple of that in the last year, I think probably more than 30 million or so. It has been an exponential growth in last 4 or 5 years.

I think we have to give it a little bit of more time to really assess the behavior of all of these investors.

Got it. Thank you, and all the best.

Thank you.

Yeah. Thanks for the opportunity and good good evening, everyone.

My first question is is on the distribution mix. I was looking at your distribution mix, and I was looking at the share of banks excluding the HDFC Bank.

Now if I compare it over the last 12 months, this the share has down, the share is basically down by around 30 to 40 basis points both on overall basis as well as on the equity AUM basis. I just wanted to know that, is the flow market share higher than the book market share here as well, and what are the strategies, so that we increase the the share here as well?

I've answered about the HDFC Bank share. Are you asking about banks other than HDFC Bank?

Yes, sir.

Yeah. Other than few banks like SBI, which is almost a closed architecture, and a few other banks which are more guided, particularly on the retail distribution side, where there would be a lesser share, but we have a very healthy relationship with almost all the other banks.

Continue to work hard with them, and won't be able to share individual data. With all the other banks who operate under an open architecture, our share has been healthy.

Sir, would you say the counter share is increasing with all these banks?

No, I think what you are seeing is the overall pie, but what happens that there is a broad-based growth across all distribution channels, right? Banks are growing, national distributors are growing, MFDs are growing, fintechs are growing, and then, of course, the direct investors are growing.

Opportunity is expanding for all the channels, and then there could be periods where, on a relative basis, one channel has grown higher than the other. Endeavor at our end is to ensure that we optimize across all channels.

Understood. My next question is on the market share bit.

Actually, I was looking at your market share the last eight to nine quarters, it's pretty much constant at around 12.8, 13-odd percent. Do you have any aspiration to increase your market share to say maybe a 14 or a 15%, or do you have any vision or strategy to how one can achieve the same?

If I remember correctly, I think in the early part of last decade, it would have been 20%. Of course, the overall size of the market was small.

Incremental flows were like a small fraction of what we get now. In last 2 years, the net flows in the industry are over ₹9 lakh crores.

This was a total equity AUM couple of years back what we have got in terms of flows. Now the market share what you are seeing is on a much larger base of AUM and much, much larger base of flows.

Having said that, aspiration is always very high. As I said, 10, 15 years back, we used to have a much larger share.

Of course, the overall environment is different, but our aspiration is always to grow more. I'll put it this way: at our end, and I generally get deeply driven by this, and each and everybody in HDFC AMC, our mission is to be the value creator for every Indian.

While on this call, I answer all the questions surrounding market share and margins and everything, but over a period of time, we believe that in a country of 1.4 billion people, industry has only got 60 million investors, and we have got 17 million. We take pride that every fourth investor has invested with us, but there are three investors in the industry out of those four who are yet to invest.

We have penetrated quite deeply in last couple of years and want to penetrate more over a period of time. The other opportunity is if you compare the people who have invested in capital market versus the people who are in the mutual fund industry.

My sense is at least 13 crore people have invested in capital markets and there are 60 million in the mutual funds. There are another 60, 70 million investors who have invested directly.

Last couple of years would have given them, looking at the market and you would have better data than me, last couple of years of experience would have taught them that it's better to invest through a professional fund manager like us than doing on their own. Of course, there is opportunity beyond that.

I think a very big opportunity on expanding the market, a lot of efforts that we put in place. As I said that everybody at our end is passionate about investor education, and we do many interesting things on the ground, digitally, virtually in many ways.

Several of our campaigns have been extraordinarily popular and appreciated not only by the investors, but even the other industry players. Our focus as a large player is on growing the market as much as getting higher share in the flows that we are getting.

In fact, the SIP flows that everybody talks about in last 4 or 5 years, there is huge contribution of HDFC AMC because we were one of the earliest one to talk about importance of long-term investing, importance of investing through the SIPs, remaining disciplined, et cetera. All the players who did that over the years, overall, as an industry, we have been a beneficiary.

Right. This is very helpful.

Thanks, and wish you all the best.

Thank you.

Hi. Can you listen to me?

As retail investors, as we see these days, increasingly seeking personalized portfolios rather than generic mutual fund units, how do you see the firm positioning its technology stack to offer direct indexing kind of thing at a scale? Over the next decade, how do you foresee this impacting the traditional active asset management?

I mentioned earlier that we have large number of products which have been in existence for a long period of time. I'm a very big believer in active investing, and our track record speaks about it.

I also believe over the next several years, given the opportunity in Indian markets, I always call this as stock pickers paradise. There is time arbitrage if you think long term and ignore the short-term noise.

There is research opportunity if you put in good resources with good people, a well laid out philosophy, the processes in place. You can continue to generate alpha, and we continue to invest in those capabilities.

We have one of the most experienced team in the industry and remain positive on that. On the other side, there would be investors who would meet their certain needs through the passive funds, and we have the best-in-class product bouquet on that, be it index fund or ETFs, be it market cap indices or the smart beta or sector thematic passive and the ETFs as well as index funds.

Of course, the distribution capability to grow both sides of our business.

Thank you. The next question I have is regarding the alternatives.

Alternatives needs kind of specialized talent, and what kind of cost-to-AUM ratio do you see on alternative division versus, let's say, a mutual fund?

We don't give segment-wise cost to income, but I've mentioned earlier the work that we have been doing to grow our alternative business and our PMS business.

As of now, we have hired high-quality investment resources, putting in place client service capabilities, putting in place all the other the capabilities in place to grow it over a period of time. We don't give segmental costs, yeah.

Okay. Thank you.

That's all from my side.

Hi. Thanks for the color so far, and all the responses.

Just one question from my side. This is on the other income component.

I'm assuming this is come from the dip in yields towards the end of March. Just want to understand if this because one of the other AMCs reported a loss in this quarter.

Was this driven because of a heavier tilt towards, sort of, debt instruments as yields softened, or was it more through active tactical rotation? How should we think about that?

Also, given the correction in Nifty in March because of the crisis, how are we adjusting our investment books, bond duration or equity sensitivity to ensure that other income continues to remain as to be a smoothing portion of our total income?

Right. If you see page 34 of our investor presentation, we have given the breakdown of the investments across multiple asset classes.

The equity investments in mutual funds that we have on the balance sheet is largely due to the skin-in-the-game circular from SEBI. That portion of the equity investments saw a drawdown because of the market correction in Q4, right?

The rest of the portfolio is largely in liquid and debt mutual funds, and we, of course, have invested in some of our own AIFs, those are early days of investments. On the liquid and debt side, we run a fairly reasonable duration, and we keep it fairly passive there.

We are not, frankly, too much active management on the mutual fund debt investments that we have on the balance sheet. Equity is largely, almost all of the equity investments in the mutual funds are because of skin-in-the-game circular.

This is an outcome of the market movement.

Sure. Just going forward, do you plan to continue with a comfortable duration on the debt side?

Yes, we are not very long on the debt duration in any case.

Sure. Thanks.

To sum up, despite a volatile year for markets, investors continued to invest in a highly disciplined manner as reflected in rising SIP flows. For us, it has been a year of consistent progress across AUM, investor base, and product expansion along with strengthening our presence across mutual funds, alternatives, and international business.

We remain focused on disciplined execution and delivering long-term value to all our stakeholders. Thank you for your time today.