Thank you. Good evening, everyone.

I am Doraiswamy, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director, LIC. I would like to welcome all of you to the results and performance update call for the 9-month period ended 31st December 2025.

Our results declared today have been uploaded along with press release and the investor presentation on our website, as well as the websites of both the exchanges, BSE and NSE. Along with me on this call, I have three Managing Directors: Shri Dinesh Pant, Shri Ratnakar Patnaik, and Shri R.

Chander. Senior officials of the corporation present in this call are: Shri A.

K. Srivastava, Appointed Actuary and Executive Director (Actuarial), from the Actuarial team; Shri Sunil Agrawal, CFO, from the finance team; Mr.

Arindam Dasgupta, Executive Director (Investment Front Office) and Chief Investment Officer, from the Investment team. From the Marketing team, we have Shri G.

P. Agrawal, Executive Director (Marketing/Product Development); Shri Hemant Buch, Executive Director (Marketing/Bancassurance and Alternate Channels); Shri K.

Seshagiridhar, Executive Director (Pension & Group Schemes). Also, we have Ms.

Shobha Sulochna, Executive Director (CRM/Policy Servicing) and Grievance Redressal Officer; Ms. Vandana Sinha, Executive Director (CRM/Claims); and Mr.

Sanjay Bajaj, Head (Investor Relations) on this call. Let me now mention the key business, operational, and financial highlights for the 9 months ended December 31st, 2025.

Our market share by first year premium income for 9 months ending December 31st, 2025, is 57.07% as per IRDAI, as compared to 57.42% for the similar period ended December 31st, 2024. We continue to maintain our leadership in the Indian life insurance market across both individual and group business segments.

Now, if we bifurcate this overall market share of 57.07% into segment-wise share of individual and group business, we would have a market share of 35.84% in individual business and 71.36% in the group business for the period of 9 months ending December 31st, 2025. On a comparable basis, for the 9 months ending December 31st, 2024, the respective market share for individual and group business were 37.21% and 71.70%, respectively.

Premium income: For the 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, we have reported a total premium income of ₹3,71,293 crore, as compared to a total premium income of ₹3,40,563 crore for the 9-month period ending December 31st, 2024, registering a growth of 9.02% on a year-on-year basis. The individual new business premium income for 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, was ₹44,941 crore, as compared to ₹42,441 crore for the similar period of last year, thereby registering an increase of 5.89% on a year-on-year basis.

Renewal premium income of individual business for 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, was ₹1,91,050 crore, as compared to ₹1,78,975 crore for the period ended 31st December 2024, registering a growth of 6.75% on year-on-year basis. Therefore, for the 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, our total individual premium income, including renewals, was at ₹2,35,991 crore, as compared to ₹2,21,416 crore for the 9 months ended December 31st, 2024, registering a growth of 6.58% on year-on-year basis.

The group business total premium income for 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, was ₹1,35,302 crore, comprising new business premium of ₹1,32,311 crore. In comparison, for 9 months ended 31st December 2024 last year, the group business total premium income was ₹1,19,147 crore, comprised new business premium of ₹1,15,576 crore.

Therefore, for the 9 months ending December 31st, the total group premium has increased by 13.56% as compared to similar period of previous year. Breakup of business on APE basis: The total annualized premium equivalent for 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, is ₹44,007 crore, which comprise individual APE of ₹27,552 crore and group APE of ₹16,455 crore.

Therefore, on APE basis, the individual business accounts for 62.61% and the group business accounts for 37.39%. Further, of the individual APE, the par business accounts for ₹17,507 crore and non-par amounts to ₹10,045 crore.

Therefore, our non-par share of individual APE is 36.46% and par is 63.54% for the 9 months period ended December 31st, 2025. As you may recall, for the 9 months ended December 31st, 2024, our non-par share of total individual business based on APE stood at 27.68%.

Since then, our non-par APE has increased from ₹6,813 crore to ₹10,045 crore, reflecting an increase of 47.44% on year-on-year basis. We are consolidating our rapid gains in non-par share of individual APE.

Sequentially, we are consolidating this year at approximately 36% plus levels. The profit after tax for the 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, was ₹33,998 crore, as compared to ₹29,138 crore for the 9 months ended December 31st, 2024, registering a growth of 16.68% on year-on-year basis.

The net VNB has registered a growth of 27.96% on year-on-year basis to ₹8,288 crore for the 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, from ₹6,477 crore for the 9 months ended December 31st, 2024. Further, the net VNB margin has improved by 170 basis points on a year-on-year basis to 18.8% for the 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, from 17.1% for the period ended December 31st, 2024.

Our solvency ratio as on December 31st, 2025, improved to 2.19 as against 2.02 on December 31st, 2024. Assets under management as on December 31st, 2025, was ₹59,16,680 crore as compared to ₹54,77,651 crore as on December 31st, 2024.

Therefore, our AUM has registered a growth of 8.01% on year-on-year basis. The product mix and new product launches: As on December 31st, 2025, we had a comprehensive suite of 59 products, excluding Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana, available for new business, including 39 individual products, 12 group products, 7 individual riders, and 1 group rider.

Here, I would like to add that currently we have 57 products. Since in January 2026, 1 new product has been launched, namely LIC's Jeevan Utsav - Single Premium, and 3 products have been withdrawn, namely LIC's New Endowment Plus, LIC's Bima Ratna, and LIC's Jeevan Azad.

Hence, we are dynamically managing our product portfolio. Therefore, as of date, we offer a total of 57 products, which comprise 37 individual products, 12 group products, 7 individual riders, and 1 group rider, excluding the Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana.

During the 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, we sold 1,16,63,856 new policies, as compared to 1,17,10,505 new policies in the 9-month period ended December 31st, 2024. As on December 31st, 2025, the total number of agents was 14,72,370, as compared to 14,19,480 as on December 31st, 2024.

The market share by number of agents as at December 31st, 2025, stands at 45.32% as against 47.40% for the December 31st, 2024. On number of policies sold basis, the agency force sold 1,14,54,396 policies during the 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, as compared to 1,13,56,466 policies during the corresponding period last year.

Further, 98.20% of our policies in the 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, were sold by our agency force. When seen on premium basis, 91.72% of new business premium came from our agency channel in the first 9 months of the current financial year.

There is a significant upward trend in the new business premium income from our bancassurance and alternate channels. Bancassurance and alternate channels collected a new business premium income of ₹3,341.37 crore for the 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, as compared to ₹2,003.95 crore for the 9 months ended December 31st, 2024, registering a growth of 66.74% on a year-on-year basis.

The new business premium income collected through banks was ₹2,035.62 crore for the 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, and for the corresponding period of last year, it was ₹1,451.64 crore, thereby registering a growth of 40.23% on year-on-year basis. Further, the alternate channels collected new business premium of ₹1,305.75 crore for the 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, as compared to ₹552.31 crore for the 9 months ended December 31st, 2024, registering a growth of 136.42% on year-on-year basis.

Our bancassurance and alternate channel now account for 7.45% of the individual new business premium for the 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, which is significantly higher than the 4.73% for 9 months ended December 31st, 2024. For the 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, the overall expense ratio was 11.65%, compared to 12.97% for the same period of last year.

Therefore, there is a decrease of 132 basis points in our overall expense ratio on year-on-year basis. Persistency: On premium basis, the persistency for 13th, 25th, 37th, 49th, and 61st month up to the 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, stands at 75.75%, 70.76%, 67.37%, 63.77%, and 61.09%, respectively, as compared to 76.66%, 71.67%, 67.10%, 63.39%, and 61.84%, respectively, up to the period of 9 months ended December 31st, 2024.

On number of policies basis, the persistency for 13th, 25th, 37th, 49th, and 61st month up to 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, stands at 64.28%, 59.82%, 55.70%, 50.63%, and 49.06%, respectively, as compared to 66.47%, 60.10%, 53.84%, 51.17%, and 49.22%, respectively, up to the 9 months ended December 31st, 2024. While acknowledging that certain cohorts have not shown any significant improvement, we assure you that we are taking multiple steps to achieve better persistency ratios.

Operational efficiency and digital process: In our digital initiative through the agent assisted ANANDA application, we have completed 14,53,124 policies during the 9-month period ended December 31st, 2025, as compared to 9,72,504 policies for the 9 months ended December 31st, 2024, thereby registering a growth of 49.42% on year-on-year basis. There is a growth of 41.50% in the number of agents who are active in ANANDA app for the period ended December 31st, 2025.

The digital innovation and value enhancement project, which is being rolled out in phases both for the distributors and customers, many features and facilities have been activated and many more will be launched this calendar year. I am sure that all of you will experience a much more digital-savvy interface in how LIC connects with you.

On the individual claims front, during the 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, we have processed 1,54,11,320 number of claims, which includes 1,47,99,971 maturity and survival benefit claims. On an amount basis, during the first 9 months ended December 31st, 2025, the total maturity claims were ₹1,68,613 crore and the total death claims were ₹18,156 crore.

On a comparable basis for the 9 months ended 31st December 2024, the maturity claims were ₹1,47,739 crore and death claims were ₹17,588 crore. Therefore, the maturity claims are higher by 14.13% and the death claims are higher by 3.23% on a year-on-year basis.

The marketing initiative update on Bima Sakhi Yojana: As of December 31st, 2025, a total of 2.97 lakh women have been designated as Bima Sakhis, successfully selling 14.3 lakh insurance policies and generating a new business premium income of ₹1,873 crore in 9-month period ended December 31st, 2025. Our objective is to appoint at least 1 Bima Sakhi in every gram panchayat and we would like to inform that out of 2,44,876 gram panchayats, we have covered 52% gram panchayats by recruiting Bima Sakhis in 1,27,417 gram panchayats up to December 31st, 2025.

Before concluding, I would like to reiterate significant highlights of our performance during the first 9 months of FY 2025-26. Our non-par share of individual APE business has further grown to 36.46% for the 9 months period of FY26, as compared to 27.68% for the same period of the previous year.

The profit after tax has grown by 16.68% to ₹33,998 crore on a year-on-year basis. Bancassurance and alternate channels registered a growth of 66.74% on a year-on-year basis to ₹3,341.37 crore.

VNB has increased by 27.96% on a year-on-year basis for the first 9 months of FY26. VNB margin has increased by 170 basis points to 18.8% for the 9 months period of FY26.

AUM has increased to ₹59.17 lakh crore, registering a growth of 8.01% on a year-on-year basis. While maintaining growth in multiple parameters, we have kept a focus on costs and, as you can see, the overall expense ratio is down by 132 basis points to 11.65% in the 9-month period of FY26.

Now, I would like to conclude by saying that LIC is well on its way to deliver all our commitments, whether on product mix, channel mix, profitability, cost effectiveness, and newer products. We are doing all this while ensuring that we continue to maintain our image of trust and credibility in the minds of the buyers of life insurance in India.

We think that ongoing use of digital marketing and a mobile-first approach will help achieve the national aim of "Insurance for All by 2047". We are thankful to all our stakeholders in their faith in our strategy and its rollout.

I now hand over the call to the moderator to start the question-and-answer session. Thank you very much.

Does the company currently have any plans to, or ongoing discussions regarding acquisition or entry into health insurance segment?

We are a strategic investor and we are a major investor in many companies and sectors. We have been evaluating, we have been looking at opportunities for enhancing our investment opportunities.

As a part of it, we were looking for enhancing our stake in a health insurance company. We are evaluating various options available in the market, but we don't have any particular deadline or any such immediate date by which we are looking at doing that.

We will be open to having a stake if a very good opportunity makes itself available.

Thank you.

Sorry. Hi, thank you for taking my question.

When I look at your VNB walk, there's a pretty significant change between 9M and first half of FY26, the VNB walk that you've explained up there. The economic assumptions have sort of significantly improved from the first half and so can you explain that?

I'm guessing this impact of operating assumption is mainly related to the GST related issue. Can you help sort of simplify both the numbers?

What are the economic assumptions which are resulting in such a sharp increase in the margin? Also, when we look at the product mix, there is a very big jump in non-par, but non-par savings products.

Can you sort of give some sort of indication of what the underlying margins are in non-par savings for you and also for the group segment? Yeah.

Earlier, you used to give gross sort of VNB margins, but you stopped disclosing that. That'll be helpful.

I would like my Appointed Actuary to explain. Good evening.

I am Ajay Kumar Srivastava, Appointed Actuary and Executive Director (Actuarial). Your first question is about the yield curve, why that economic assumptions and the results have gone up.

The favorable yield curve of Q3 of around 83 basis points or 80 basis points, particularly at higher durations, that has impacted and contributed to an increase of 1.9%. It's because of the higher favorable yield curve.

Your second question was that the operating impact on the VNB margins, so that has impacted 2.8%, but this includes the GST impact, the impact of persistency, and alignment of expenses in group business to reflect the current experience. All this thing put together have actually contributed to this decrease in VNB margin by 2.8%.

The business mix if we look at in entirety, it has increased from 18% to 23% if we consider the entire business, including group. The impact of this is the 48% contribution to the VNB margin, which indicates the contribution of non-par business and the increase of it on the VNB margin.

The group you asked about the impact of that, for the group, marginally the proportion has gone up from 35% to 37%, and 37% of this proportion contributes to about 24% of the VNB margin. I think this, while we have given the consolidated numbers on VNB margin for the corporation as a whole, this proportion of the business and the contribution to the VNB margin may give you a good indication of why the VNB margin has increased from 17.1% to 18.8% Y-o-Y basis.

Got it, sir. Just a follow-up question.

Do you run a hedged non-par product portfolio? Or is it just that this quarter, you did not revise the IRRs upwards, which has sort of resulted in a higher margin in non-par?

Arindam Dasgupta (Executive Director - Investment Front Office and Chief Investment Officer): Here, I'm just responding to it. I'm the CIO here.

To speak, we are very active in the interest rate derivatives space currently, and we are regularly doing forward rate agreements, FRAs, at regular intervals, and we try to hedge our position to the maximum.

Got it. Got it, sir.

Congratulations on a very good set of numbers and all the best.

Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Good evening to the team. My first question to Mr.

Doraiswamy is, as LIC moves through this stage, how do you balance between growing the business, keeping operations efficient, and protecting the profits? When the situation changes, like competition, cost, or customer trends, what helps you decide which of these should be the main focus?

That's my first question. I'll ask my second question after this.

Thank you.

Thank you. The focus is on managing a continuous, sustained, profitable growth.

Our focus will be to continuously improve the new business performance and top-line growth, so that the impact of expenses that happen, like the input tax credit of GST or whatever it is, gets subsumed into the overall efficiency of the corporation. On the expenses part, yes, we are continuously focusing on the rationalization of course, partly because our senior working team is also facing a lot of retirements, and we are replacing them by younger people by recruiting at various levels.

We are able to attain a cost rationalization in this also, as well as the other expenses by going digital, by saving our operational expenses at various levels. There is a continuous activity of improving our operational efficiency at the ground level, while also focusing on increasing the contribution from the various channels.

We are also focusing on improving the contribution of bancassurance and alternate channels, which in our case also comes up with a bit more cost efficiency, as well as we are also looking at enhancing our digital footprint. All these will continue to be focused, and we'd like to take on the competition or whatever it is based on our continued focus on keeping our agency productivity increased, as well as contribution from other channels, by improving the top-line growth and continuously working on the rationalization of expenses.

Thank you. My second question to Mr.

Agarwal is, again, along the similar lines, when early signs, such as receivables, investment flows, or costs begin to change, what guides your response towards this? How do you decide the next step so that you stay ahead of pressure or capture the upside before it shows up on the balance sheet?

Just want to understand how you approach this particular thing. Thank you.

It all depends on the cash flows that are available from time to time and depending on our ALM position, because we know the maturities and the outgoes that are planned and more or less the expense trend is also known in advance. Accordingly, we plan our investment strategy and deploy the funds in the market.

Thank you and best of luck.

Thank you.

Sir, first of all, congratulations on...

Any better now?

Go ahead. I'm able to hear you.

Yeah. Thank you, sir.

Sir, congratulations on a great set of numbers. Sir, if we can see that for the 9 months, we have reported a PAT growth of 17%, which is now at ₹34,000 crore around.

Sir, in spite of reporting such strong growth, our solvency is, sir, continuously improving. Quarter-on-quarter, it has also improved, and now we are at 219% solvency, which should be comfortable again.

Sir, my question is on dividend payout. That what we are seeing is the payout ratio is on the lower side.

If you can help us understand how is the board and corporation really thinking on dividend payout, that will be very helpful, sir.

Thank you for your question. Actually, this is a call that board will have to take from time to time.

If you see over the last 3 years, we have been improving or increasing our dividend paid. We started at ₹4, then we moved to ₹10, and then we have moved to ₹12.

We are expecting it to be better in the current year also, but it's not a call that I can take individually. When we declare the results of the full financial year, our board will be taking a call, so that our growth in the dividend payout is also sustainable.

As of now, we have built up quite a good amount of reserve, we are comfortable in that area. After the final results are declared, perhaps we'll be able to take a call.

Got it, sir. That was very helpful.

All the best, sir, and congratulations for a great set of numbers. Thank you, sir.

Thank you very much. Thank you, sir.

Thank you.

Hi, good evening, sir. Just a few questions from my side.

First, if I look at the ticket size of your non-par savings business and par business, there seems to be a little bit of trajectory change compared to what we were seeing for the past few quarters in both these segments. Just wanted to get some color on the subproducts within this segment and has there been any shift across the quarter out there?

My second question is on the banca and alternate channel. Could it be possible for you to kind of segregate it between core bancassurance and other channels and also the sort of product mix across some of this channels, how are you seeing that evolving?

The third question is taking cues from the previous participant's question in terms of your dividend payout policy. I just wanted to understand, now you're sitting with almost a net worth of ₹1.5 trillion plus, your solvency is also quite comfortable.

It seems that you might have done some rounds of exercise on IFRS calculations also. Is there some visibility on let's say even 2, 3 years out, what can be a steady-state dividend payout ratio for a company of your vintage?

Those were my three questions.

Shri G. P.

Agarwal on the ticket size of...

Yeah. Our ticket size of Indian business is improving because of this annuity plans we are having growth.

Similarly, in ULIPs also.

Non-par savings?

Actually, yeah.

If we look at on the basis of individual APE, then in that case, we'll find that because that takes care of the mode of payments, therefore, average individual APE if we look at as compared to December 2024, it has gone up from ₹28,034 to ₹31,882 in case of single premium. In case of non-single, it has gone up from ₹20,542 to ₹23,051.

It has increased significantly. With this interventions which we had done last year while reviewing the products after this product regulations had come up, you would be aware that in some products, not on all, we had increased the minimum sum assured.

We expect that going forward, we'll be having a higher ticket size on the basis of APE going forward.

Coming to banca per se, we I think Mr. CEO, sir, detailed it out during his address that both banca, core as well as alternate, they have been in fact contributing significantly in terms of overall volume.

Banca continued to grow at almost around 40% for period ending 31st of December, and alternate of course, have been showing a healthier growth of around 136% in terms of comparative data over corresponding period of last year. Putting it in numbers, banks contributed around ₹2,035 crore as at December '25, while ₹1,305 crore came from alternates.

We look forward to continue the same set of healthy numbers and quite confident of maintaining the same growth rates for the year as well. Hopefully, we should be closing Q4 also on a strong note.

As far as the product mix within banca is concerned, in fact, banca continues to lead in terms of non-par contribution, and currently, in fact, banca has almost around 90% to 10% 90% to 10% kind of weightage between non-par/par. As regards your last question on dividend, if you look back at the dividend history, we started off with ₹1.5 per share, and we've increased it 8 times over a period of last 3, 4 years.

As sir already mentioned, we'll be sustaining. We are ensuring that the dividend is sustainable in coming days.

Also, as you rightly pointed out, there are variety of things happening on the IFRS front as well. We are yet to complete the assessment, because many things are at the draft stage as of now.

As and when they are notified and they are enforced, we'll look at the impact and thereafter come back with a concrete dividend policy. As far as the sustainability is concerned, we'll ensure that it is sustainable whatever dividends are paid.

Got it, sir. Just one small follow-up question.

In terms of the government shareholding in LIC, also there are some stipulated timeline. Any color that you can share on this aspect?

That's all from my side. Thank you and all the best.

See, on that, the regulatory position now is that the holding of the government will be reduced by 10%, that is it'll come down to 90% within a period of 5 years from the date of IPO, which is by 2027 we should be able to come down to that. The government and LIC together, we are working towards making it happen.

Maybe you'll be hearing about the further tranche of shares being offered in the next few months to come.

Got it, sir. Thank you and all the best.

Good evening, sir. My question about the performance of the company.

Being a investor, my concern is that from the last 4 years, I'm carrying the negative carry from your listed price. When I can just look at the positivity?

See, dividend is all this is fine, but when I carry the capital depreciation negative carry, then why should I keep your share in my portfolio? The second thing, now the page number 7 and 11 of your presentation slides, there is a lot of negativity.

There is a market share is loss, your banca insurance policy is reduced by 44%. Why this 4 and 5 negative is there in the particular performance?

Because you are losing your market share further in other companies.

Thank you. See, we are looking at all the steps that we can be taking to ensure that the price will see an uptake at the earliest.

We are working on that continuously. We are hoping that this will be happening at the nearest possible time.

On the other side, yes, the market share loss when the market as a number of players expand, the market share of the biggest player is likely to be reduced, because any new player coming in and taking up even a small volume of business means the overall pie will grow, but the share will get split. We are looking at continuously growing on a sustainable basis.

That is what we are looking at. We'll be looking at a growth rate commensurate with the industry or in such a way that we propel the growth of the industry as a whole.

That's what we are looking at. When the number of players keep increasing now with the new latest Insurance Act of 100% FDI, there may be more players entering the market.

As more and more players enter, the market gets divided among the participants. Market share loss by itself is not a major issue, but what we are looking at is a growth and that too at a sustainable level is something that we are looking at.

On the bancassurance side, I don't know whether you are looking at the number of policies side. Yes, we had a good contribution from a major alternate channel partner with us, who has been facing some issue with their operation in their area of where they are focusing.

They could not repeat. They did a good volume of number of policies last year, but they're all of small ticket size on the individual side.

They were having some problem during the current year. I think they are overcoming that problem and soon they'll be coming back to their earlier form of activity, and I'm sure we'll be recapturing on that.

Though there had been a fall in the contribution on number of policies by the alternate channel partner, we have been able to show a substantial increase in the premium side from the bancassurance as well as alternate channel. Bankers have shown a growth of more than 40%, whereas the alternate channels have shown a growth of more than 126% in terms of premium.

Our focus has been on garnering more premium through this channel and improving that share. If you have noticed, over a corresponding period on a year-to-year basis, we have almost increased from 4.7% to 7.23% as a share from bancassurance.

That focus will continue to be there. We'll be improving the contribution from this channel as the days to come.

Thank you, sir.

Hi. Just going back to the first question, which is the impact of operating assumptions.

You mentioned that this 2.8% includes persistency expenses and GST. Is it possible for you to give us some color in terms of how this breaks up?

In fact, if we go through the calculations, all these factors which I spoke about, that is persistency, expenses, GST as part of expenses, they all interact, and there are various other factors which get into the determination of the VNB margin. Therefore, what we have shown is the overall impact of that.

Because of that interaction and all those things, these numbers keep on changing within those parameters which I had mentioned. That's the reason we have shown it together as 2.8%.

Because

GST is a, to say, one-off event, which can probably be neutralized over time. Hence, if we kind of set that aside, we were just curious to understand as to how the ongoing business is moving.

If you could give any color on that, that would be useful. See,

GST, I don't know whether you can take it as a one-off event, because as of now, it stands by the council, you can take it as around 40% of the 2.8% or whatever it is, maybe will be through the GST ITC not being available. As we go forward, we are looking at getting it subsumed by the rationalization of expenses.

That's why we are not splitting it. We are trying to do two things.

One, thanks to the increase in affordability by the customer not having been required to pay GST, we are seeing an uptake in both the ticket size, as well as the amount that we are looking at. We are looking at a top-line growth, while maintaining a rationalization of expenses, overall expenses gets reduced, so that the impact of GST can be suitably accommodated within that.

Why would you have higher than estimated expenses? Because I thought on the expenses line we should be positive, right, given the volume tailwind that we have seen.

No, yeah, that's what. We are looking at a deduction in the overall expenses ratio, as well as the management expenses have been going down.

If you are talking about the quarter-on-quarter comparison versus as you rightly observed that it's a one-time GST impact that was accounted for in quarter 4, a quarter 3, and therefore, comparatively, it is it is higher as compared to your previous quarter.

No, sorry. What I was trying to say is that, see, if I look at the -2.8%, clearly you mentioned GST was sort of 40% contributed to it, and then I would believe the balance 60 is negative on persistency and negative on expenses.

I understand the persistency part, but why would you carry a negative operating variance on expenses when your volume growth is so strong?

The mention was not in all lines of business. As the overall expenses, as has been discussed, has come down, but in some lines of business, depending upon the experience, that has been factored in.

The impact of those lines of business where it has been set to the current experience, the impact is only not on the entire business.

Got it. Thank you.

Yeah. Hi, sir.

Thanks for the opportunity. Sir, my first question is on the growth side.

If I look at par business during the quarter, it seems we have grown significantly higher than what we have done in the first 6 months. If you can shed some light on that, have we made any product intervention or is this primarily because of the base effect we had?

Secondly, on the persistency, it has dropped across most of the cohorts. If you can shed some light on which product segments we are experiencing lower than the company average persistency levels, and is there anything to read it from the monthly mode of ULIP persistencies?

These are two questions from my side.

Our experience on persistency is that the low ticket size of policies have poorer persistency. The frequency of payment, if it is higher, that is also is having an adverse impact on the persistency.

Now, some of these things we have addressed in the last year, as I say that the minimum ticket size has gone up, and the impact of that is expected when we start looking at the 13th month persistency, which is yet to unfold. For the time being, we are talking about the persistency which is coming down is pertaining to those businesses which were done prior to the intervention which we made last year.

Once we get this unfolding of the impact of the interventions we had taken last year, we would be able to see the impact of that increase in the persistency. Sir.

What about the growth on the par business side, which we have seen during the quarter? The par business also as we mentioned, slightly this VNB margin also has gone up on that, particularly because on APE basis, if you look at the average ticket size in par business has gone up.

That average ticket size going up is again a result of what I mentioned through the intervention of some of the products where the minimum ticket size were increased. Going forward, once the ticket size increases, that will be having impact on the margins in the par business as well.

I would also like to add that the geographical spread and the segment-wise spread that LIC has, compared to other insurance companies, in terms of business, also adds to the persistency issue. People who are not from the affluent sections of the society, they take a policy, but perhaps they may not be able to pay on time, but as and when their seasonal income improves, they come back and pay the arrears and bring the policies in force.

We continuously work on reviving the existing policies for which premiums are not paid in time, which would have affected our persistency, by getting them back as a revival or reinstatement, that also helps. We address the lack of persistency, particularly in terms of 13th month and earlier months, by going on a campaign mode in terms of revival of lapsed policies also.

That's also contributing to our improvement in profitability over a period of time.

Sir, is it right to assume that we are experiencing a negative persistency variance as compared to what we have actually built in?

Persistency and other experience items continuously get reviewed periodically, and it is not one such factor which gets into the purpose of the VNB margins, etc., but whole lots of things. Persistency is one such thing.

When the persistency goes down, if that gets factored in, that will be having impact on the margins as well.

One point we can note here is that, yes, as it is a point in which this assumptions changes are negative, persistency have gone down. We need to appreciate one thing that LIC, as an organization, is not exactly same to the other organizations.

We have a role to play for ensuring insurance for all, right? In that context, it is a very important decision.

See, LIC can take a decision to improve the ticket size significantly, naturally it will lead to higher persistency. Then affordability of insurance and being responsible for ensuring that everybody is covered is also very paramount, because the customer base is something which is USP for LIC.

Even when persistency is an issue, but the large base of insurance coverage that is being done by the corporation. A lot of steps have been taken in this context, if you would recall, that many products had been withdrawn, many products have been modified.

As has been mentioned by Mr. Srivastava just now, that it is a very key area of focus for us, and the steps that they were taken, because if we see last year, we revised the ticket size of the policies from minimum ₹1 lakh to ₹2 lakh, and that had an impact that the business volumes in terms of policies went down significantly.

Now, we have to ensure that coverage also continue. Now, in this context, the steps that were taken last year, because the manner of determination of persistency is that you have to observe it for one year entire period, and then there's a method in which it is done, that will unfold in the next year.

What you're talking about persistency in terms of 63%, 64%, or 65% or so is in terms of policies. In terms of premium, actually our persistency is much better, 75% or so.

Another important factor which needs to be noted is that the ticket size between participating, non-participating is significantly different, while the average is around ₹20,000. The ticket size for the non-participating is larger.

The persistency in that segment is there. Another important point in context of LIC which has to be noted is that LIC has a big book size of single premium policies, which actually does not come into the regulatory method of calculation of 13-month persistency, because fully paid-up policies and single premium policies are not a part of that calculation.

If a realistic assessment is done, based on inclusion of single premium policies also and paid-up policies, LIC's persistency will look much better and higher as compared to that thing. Persistency currently being seen is in context of the methodology which is prescribed, which exclude paid-up and single premium policies.

As we mentioned earlier, while we remain focused and it's a total endeavor for the corporation that we have to work towards persistency, because yes, as you rightly mentioned, reduction in persistency impacts the profitability, long-term profitability, but we have to rebalance that we continue to provide products which are for the masses as well as which are for the classes, so that while we continue to create value for the shareholders, we also need for keep on creating options and product solutions for all classes of customers. That is something which is very important and core to our business activity.

Thank you. Sir, just a small follow-up on this.

If you can shed some light on the alternate channels. What kind of product mix they are into?

Are they much more heavier onto the ULIP side as compared to the par segment? What's the persistency on those channels?

Lastly, final question is on the distribution cost. There have been a lot of concern around the distribution cost in terms of the payouts which the companies makes to the distributors.

What do you think? If the deferral of the commission gets into the picture, would it be a help the industry to resolve the persistency related issues and reigning on the distributor payouts?

Alternate channel product mix remains, in fact, more or less non-par centric, with both, in fact, annuity and ULIPs contributing healthy volumes. It is not only, in fact, driven by ULIPs.

Annuity also contribute, in fact, significantly in terms of contributions coming from alternate channels, including banks. Far as the commission structure or the...

Not only alternate channel, banks have also been contributing substantially on a single premium component, their persistency are at the highest. We can safely take it as a very big.

Even for the one organization which was contributing heavily in the last year, which they could not repeat this year, they were all of a very high persistency of close to around 90% to 92% is what we are experiencing. When it comes to the distribution costs, you will appreciate that LIC has been different from the rest of the industry.

We have been managing and maintaining our distribution cost at a much lower level than the rest of the industry, and whatever the talks that has been made now is in respect of the higher distribution cost that was seen in the other companies. We have been consistently maintaining, and we are adhering to the regulatory restrictions which were there in 2013 and 2016, though subsequently those regulations were removed.

We have been keeping it at an optimal level. As and when the regulator takes a call, and in case if there is a modification that is going to be prescribed, we'll be fully compliant and ensuring that it happens.

LIC has always been having a proportion of commission that is being paid out of the total that we are spending towards the renewal premium, and so that has been one area where we are able to do much better in terms of persistency of 61st month and thereafter, which is not being measured and disclosed.

Thank you, sir, for this elaborate answer and wishing you all the best.

Thank you very much.

Hi, sir. Thank you for taking my follow-up.

Just on the breakup of the operating expense assumption change, how much of that is because of GST? Can you sort of just quantify that number?

Second, the mark-to-market fluctuation for 31st December ending, that we can get from PDs, right? The policyholders account, that number would be the right number to look at?

As I said, the components within that, they interact each other, and at any point of time, that number may be, the different when the mix actually differs. Therefore, quantifying this specific one component may be a little, a little information may be taken in a different manner.

Therefore, any information which is going to be different on the basis of the GST based on the mix, we have taken all that components together and have given a single number, which is 2.8%. That includes GST expense, which we have been taking as, the part of expenses and absorbed accordingly.

Got it, sir. Thank you and all the best.

I would like to thank all of you for taking the time to attend our late evening conference call today. As we conclude our review for the 9-month performance of FY26, I want to convey my appreciation to everyone for your continued confidence, collaboration, and engagement with LIC.

Your thoughtful questions show a deep insight into our operations and strategic direction. I trust we have resolved all your concerns satisfactorily.

If you require any further assistance or wish to continue the dialogue, please contact our Investor Relations team. Thank you and have a good night.