Thank you, Shailendra. Good afternoon, everyone.

On behalf of Manorama Industries Limited, I welcome you all to the company's Q4 and FY26 conference call to discuss the performance of the company and to answer your questions. We have with us the management team comprising of Mr.

Ashish Saraf, Chairman and Managing Director; Mr. Ashok Jain, Director and Chief Financial Officer; Mr.

Pankaj Rathi, DGM Accounts and Finance; Mrs. Ekta Soni, AVP Investor Relations; and Mr.

Deepak Sharma, Company Secretary and Compliance Officer. Before we proceed this call, I would like to draw your attention to the fact that today's discussion may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to various risks, uncertainties, and other factors, which will be beyond management's control.

We kindly request to bear in mind that there might be uncertainties while interpreting such statements. Please note that this conference is being recorded.

We would now like to start the session with opening remarks from the management team. Afterwards, we will open the floor for an interactive Q&A session.

I would now hand over the conference call to Ashish ji for his opening remarks. Thank you, and over to you, sir.

Thank you, Hiral ji. Good afternoon, friends.

On behalf of the entire Manorama Industries team, I extend a warm welcome to our Q4 and Financial Year 2026 earnings conference call. We sincerely thank each of our investors, stakeholders, analysts for your continued trust and participation.

Your deep confidence in our long-term vision is a source of great motivation for us, and we remain committed to deliver a sustained and quality value as we enter the next fourth phase of our growth journey and as we have done in our last many years of performance. Financial Year 2026 has been a year of exceptional performance.

Manorama Industries has delivered a performance exceptional performance in 2026. Despite these headwinds, we have reported a strong year-on-year revenue growth of 76.1%, with standalone revenues reaching INR 1,358 crores.

This excellence in performance is a testament to the resilience of our integrated value chain, the global relevance of our specialty fats and cocoa butter equivalents, and the sustained and growing demand we continue to witness across the food and cosmetics sectors worldwide through our scientific and high-tech products, which are being used all over the world. We aim to maintain this momentum, supported by sustained demand visibility, improved operational efficiency, and enhanced manufacturing capacity.

We plan to reach every human on this earth. During Financial Year 2026, we undertook capacity upgrades to power this next phase of growth.

Our solvent fractionation plant 2 increased installed capacity by 30% from 25,000 tonnes per annum to 32,500 tonnes per annum as part of an overall debottlenecking initiative. Solvent fractionation plant 1 of 15,000 metric tonne, a similar debottleneck initiative will be taken in this fiscal year.

Through strategic capital expenditure commitment of approximately INR 460 crores over the next 2 to 3 years, this investment program spans setting up of our new solvent fractionation manufacturing facility for sal, shea, palm, mango, and other exotic seeds and SOS, establishment of a new facility for cocoa butter alternatives, expansion of our refining capabilities with an additional 200 tonnes per day refinery, commissioning of raw material processing units in Burkina Faso, West Africa. These initiatives reflect our focus in the long-term global opportunity and our commitment to deepening our competitiveness, securing reliable long-term supply, and reinforcing the foundation for sustained growth.

Our financials remains healthy as of March 31st, 2026. Working capital cycle improved to approximately 125 days in Financial Year 2026 compared to 151 days in Financial Year 2025.

Net cash flow from operating activities stood at INR 259 crores. ROCE of 33.6% and ROE of 40.3%.

At Manorama Industries, our aim is clear: to strengthen every growth lever within our integrated value chain, from procurement and processing to high-tech innovation with scientific global customer partnerships based on research and deep tech development. With that, I will now hand over to our Chief Financial Officer, Mr.

Ashok Jain, to walk you through the financial and operational highlights for the quarter and the full year. Thank you all.

Thank you, Ashish sir, and good afternoon, everyone. I will take you through our financial performance for quarter 4 and full year 2025-2026.

Full year's Financial Year 2025-2026 financial highlights: Manorama Industries delivered excellent financial performance in Financial Year 2025-2026, with all key metrics reflecting operational execution and business momentum. Standalone revenue, INR 1,357 crores, up 76.1% year-on-year, driven by volume growth and improved product mix.

EBITDA, INR 367.7 crores, with an EBITDA margin of 27.1%, reflecting focused product mix optimization and disciplined cost management. Profit after tax, INR 233.2 crores, translating to a PAT margin of 17.2%.

Operating cash flow, INR 259.4 crore rupees. For quarter 4, Financial Year 2025-2026 performance: Our performance of quarter 4 2025-2026 as follows: Standalone revenue, INR 382.3 crore rupees.

EBITDA, INR 102.9 crores, with a margin of 26.9%. Profit after tax, INR 59.5 crores, translating to a margin of 15.6%.

Foreign exchange position and mark-to-market: During the quarter, due to adverse currency fluctuations, resulted in the company recognizing a mark-to-market provision of 17.05 crores on standalone basis on forward contracts entered into accordance with the as per foreign exchange hedging policy. The cumulative mark-to-market provision for the financial year stand at 23.3 crores.

The company also recorded foreign exchange income 9.47 crores during the quarter. Consequently, the net foreign exchange loss for the quarter amount to of rupees 7.58 crores on standalone basis.

Balance sheet and return ratios: The company's standalone balance sheet continues to reflect financial strength and discipline. Net debt-and-equity ratio is 0.38 is to 1 as of now 31st March, 2026.

Return on equity, 40.3% as of 31st March, 2026. Return on capital employed, ROCE, 33.6% as on 31st March, 2026.

Working capital days also reduced 125 days for Financial Year 2025-2026 from 151 days in '24-25, reflecting continued focus on working capital efficiency. Capital allocation and strategic outlook: Our ongoing capacity, debottlenecking, and expansion, along with strategic capex investments across India and Africa.

We are fully aligned with our long-term ambition to our global footprint and strengthen our position in the specialty fats and market fats and butter market. We will continue to allocate capital with disciplined, prioritizing investments that generate high returns and strengthen our competitive moat globally.

That concludes our remarks. We will open the floor for questions and answers.

Thank you.

Hello?

Hi. Congrats to the team Manorama on the fantastic results.

The question that I had was regarding the processing plant, capex that we are doing in Burkina Faso. What is the capex, and how will it, what will be the capacity, and how will it help us in the margin expansion?

Hi, thank you for the question. The Burkina Faso, which is a backward integration part of the project for the company's next capex plan.

We are envisaging the expenses of capex amount of around 120-odd crores towards our Burkina Faso project, which should be eliminating our logistics costs, which is currently by on the seeds perspective. Going forward, it will be on the butter perspective, which is approximately 45, 50% of the raw materials.

Accordingly, we are going to save the logistics cost, freight costs on our seed imports from West African countries, and also it is going to improve the efficiency and the yield format also on the butter content. We are very hopeful of making sustainable margin, and it should reflect in our numbers going forward.

That's helpful. Thank you.

Hi. Thanks for the opportunity, and many congratulations on an extremely good set of numbers.

One standout in the result has been your working capital improvement and operating cash flow generation. Now given that we're going to go in a capex mode again for next 1, 2 years, how do we see this whole operating cash flow and free cash flow generation?

Second is working capital. Is this working capital kind of sustainable for next few years, or we might see some pressure basically as we move ahead?

That's my first question. See,

this company has delivered a very strong, positive operating cash flow also of approximately around 260 crores during the year, which is actually a significant achievement and an important milestone for the business. Yes, we are going to spend the capex of around 460 crores over the next 2 to 3 years, but that will be held in a phased manner.

Our ongoing capacity which is there are yet to be fully utilized, and we expect a better operational efficiency in the coming years. We are not expecting any downward pressure on the margin from the current level.

Anything adverse which we will be updating to our shareholders accordingly on a quarter-to-quarter basis. We have presented a very good operating cash flow also, and the management considered this to be one of the key highlights in the performance, and we remain confident of maintaining our this working capital days and inventory days, which we have reported this quarter.

Sure. That's very good to hear.

We maintain that margin guidance of 25% to 27%, and the cash conversion cycle which we clocked in FY26 broadly should be in line for next 1, 2 years basically.

Yes, the company aims to maintain all the financial parameters going forward as well. Any headwinds, we will be updating you on a quarter-to-quarter basis.

As of now, we are likely aiming to maintain and sustain this level.

Sure. Second on the growth guidance, how should one look at it, top-line growth for next couple of years given that the capacity additions which we are doing and margins you have already highlighted, but if on top-line growth if you can share some color, ma'am?

Yes, see, the outlook for '27, FY27 remains strongly positive on the top-line front as well. It is driven clearly by the structural growth levers already which are there in the motion.

If we talk about the structural levers, there is capacity expansion in terms of debottlenecking. Our existing capacity are in the mode of debottlenecking, for which one plant we already have done the debottlenecking and the output has been increased to 30% on our 25,000 metric tonne plant.

We have been continuously increasing the value-added portion on our product mix as well. Overall, the Financial Year '27 is expected to be a very good growth year for revenues for the company, with growth primarily volume-led driven, and some price realization benefit also, structurally driven by the capacity expansion.

Also we are diversifying globally also, getting into the global market, international market also with our increasing value-added product mix. We are very hopeful and confident of having a very good strong growth year for FY27 as well.

Sure. Just to, if you can give a broad range, is it fair to assume 25% plus growth can continue, given that we have grown at almost 60% CAGR for last 3 years, and now our base is also high?

Would 25, 30% would be a right metric in terms of growth rate? See,

that is the company aim also, and we see our capacity also to be fully utilized. The company is totally driven by and working very hard to achieve the growth which you have mentioned currently.

We are very confident on the business parlance to achieve that kind of a growth given our coming capacities which will be there. We are very hopeful and constructive on the growth as well.

Sure. Just one last question if I can squeeze in.

Given that we are doing backward integration in Burkina Faso, right, and we all know there are certain political, currency, and those kind of risk involved in Africa. Anything you can share, what are your thoughts on it and how are we hedged against those kind of risks basically?

See, we for that, it's a government-backed project also because we have signed an MOU, memorandum of understanding, with the government of Burkina Faso. Anything politically will be not affecting the project what we are going to put up there, and it is going to also put the money into the livelihood of the forest dwellers of West Africa.

Even these parlance metrics of the business, if the political uncertainty or insecurity does not materially affect our operation in Africa. It is a government-backed project for which we have already signed the MOU of government of Burkina Faso, and we are doing various [relief?]

on with it as well. We have done some meaningful upgrades and status we have done in that project as well.

Sure. Thank you.

This is helpful. Best wishes for coming quarters.

Thank you.

Congratulation whole Manorama team for excellent performance. Ma'am, just to get some sense that this working capital, despite our inventory has gone up reasonably high, may I have some idea whether it's a finished goods or raw material?

How do we should look, despite we have generated good free cash flow, how should we look at it in future, going ahead?

Basically, sir, 45 to 50% is the raw material cost in our business. Whatever inventory we report in the current fiscal year towards the end of the balance sheet year is the base to generate the revenue of the coming year.

Currently, the company's total inventory stood at approximately 710 crores. The inventory is well aligned with the scale of operations, and it supports the integrated global supply chain and expanding business requirements.

The breakup of the inventory is, out of this 710 crores of inventory, raw material inventory is around 420 crores, the finished goods inventory are around 260 crores, the other co-products and WIPs, work-in-progress products, are around 30 crores. This is the breakup of our inventory levels.

Okay. Ma'am, I missed your earlier remark.

I joined a little later. This capex that around 400 plus crore that we have announced, is if you can give a little broader color and how do we think that can help us in improving a top line as well as EBITDA side, if you can give say more color?

Sir, we have been making progress on this 460 crores. If I can explain for this project, we already have spent around 52 crores, out of which 16 crores is the work-in-progress towards capex investment.

We already have acquired the land also for Indian plants. The project 1 is a forward integration process, which includes the CBE plant and the solvent fractionation 3 plant of 75,000 tonnes.

This will convert our soft fractions olein into the hard fractions. This is the one project which will include the CBE plant, fractionation plant, and also the refinery plant of 90,000 tonnes metric tonnes per annum.

This forward integration, if you can give. You were saying that.

Please continue.

Sir, because these projects are at different stage of implementation and ramp-up, and the company is focused on maintaining the disciplined capital allocation also because we have given our earlier communication towards we are expecting around 6x, more than 6x of asset turn on our forward integration project, which is around 330, 40 crores of the total capex amount.

That forward integration is what? You said something I missed it.

It's the CBE, stearin plant and the solvent fractionation 3 plant along with the refinery plant.

Okay. How that

It's there on our uploaded also. If you want to have more details on it, you can go through the presentation uploaded with respect to the capex announced also.

Okay. This forward integration is a more value accretive or in EBITDA term or if you can when it's a very high, asset turnover, how do we think about it?

The idea and the intention and the aim, of course, is to create a better accretive numbers in terms of top lines and margins. We can comment to that it will be having the same kind of potential margins in the business which we are reporting currently or even when it could be potentially better once we ramp up, get into fully optimized products, get into a better product mix as well.

That we are going to communicate you and update you quarter to quarter because these projects are being set up in a phased manner. This project what we are setting up are going to be giving a good accretive on terms of value, margins, and also top lines as well.

Great. When do we expect that to commission those phased manner project?

All our projects are being targeted to be commissioned by the year 2028, Financial Year 2028, particularly. That is how we are targeting it to spend.

It is 2 to 3-year window we are targeting to complete it.

Is it fair understanding

I just want to understand the cash flow part of it, funding part.

yeah. Yeah.

From a financial strength perspective, yes, we have a free cash FD of around 130 crores. We already have spent 52 crores on the project, and we are providing as of now the internal funding support for the planned expansion program.

Anything if we are targeting for any external financing, we will update you accordingly. As of now, we have started funding our project through internal accruals.

External financing

could be debt or equity.

Okay. Thank you very much for and all the best.

Hello. Good afternoon, team.

Congratulations for the wonderful set of numbers once again. There are two questions.

The first one is on the growth part. Basically, ma'am, you just mentioned that we do have a capex program which is spread across next 2, 3 years.

Of course, FY27 growth will be taken care of with the current debottlenecking capacity which will increase. What about, ma'am, FY28?

Because as I can understand, this entire capex will be commissioned together. The growth of the business beyond FY27, from where we can expect the growth to come for FY28?

Because capex will commission FY28, we will witness in FY29 and '30. For FY28, just wanted to understand how we plan to grow.

You need to understand company from a long-term perspective, not a quarter-to-quarter thing. It's not a thing that there will be there.

Of course, the company is very poised and fueled for the growth given the capacity we have. Existing capacity are on a utilization level of 85% of 40,000 tonnes.

We have said that we are debottlenecking capacity on 40,000 tonnes, which will take our capacity to 52,000 tonnes per annum. This is the input capacity.

We are upgrading our value-added product mix also. Currently, we see the current fiscal year and the coming fiscal year are very good for the growth, given our utilization is still yet to be there on a optimized level, and we expect a price realization growth also of 5, 10%.

If you calculate all the metrics, there is a clear output which is visible of a 30% volume accretive growth, and 5, 10% could be our price realization benefit also. On top of that, we are yet to utilize our 15% capacity of existing plant as well.

The map is clearly visible for you to calculate how the turnover will be looking in the next 2 years as well, along with our further capex plans.

Okay. Ma'am, I think, we do have significant portion in exports.

On the recent West Asia war, do we face any impact, because on the side of shipments, logistics, etc.? What is the situation over there?

This is you're talking from the war's standpoint of view?

Yes, ma'am, from the war standpoint.

Okay. The ongoing, ongoing geopolitical tension, including Iran-US, Russia-Ukraine, or some, the tariff, are expected to have a near-term indirect impact not only on our industry, but a broader industry environment as a whole.

It will be primarily through higher energy prices or maybe elevated freight costs and currency volatility. However, from a business fundamental perspective on Manorama Industries, the company remains largely insulated from any direct, substantial impact.

Its key raw materials, which we are importing or having indigenous like sal, mango, or shea, are not sourced from the affected regions. The company also has a very minimal revenue exposure to this geographies.

Therefore, for example, there may be some short-term macro pressure, such as some input cost inflation on freight cost or anything, but that does not materially impact the company's core business model or a long-term growth trajectory. There could be some minor impact maybe here and there, but we are despite all the headwinds which is there on a geopolitical tension of Russia-Ukraine war or US-Iran conflict, the company has reported a sustainable margin despite all the headwinds, and we are going to we aim to maintain and sustain this level also.

Ma'am. Wonderful to hear that.

Ma'am, on the capex side, just referring to your previous participant's conversation, you just mentioned that, the capex plan and the funding mix, you have we have internal accruals roughly around 100, 120 crores every year. Along with that, you have debt available also.

What about the QIP which we have taken the approval of up to 500 crores? How exactly do you plan to fund the entire capex?

See, sir, basically, the funding of the capex is one thing. The QIP resolution is another thing.

It will give you a very true thing to combine both this thing. Capex is one thing, which we already have started doing it through our internal accruals.

We have good internal cash flows as well. In terms of QIP, this is an approved enabling resolution in relation it could be a potential fundraise maybe through a permissible modes and instruments.

We are currently evaluating various options, and we can make appropriate disclosure in accordance with the applicable law as and when any specific transaction-related parameters, which including structure, size, or timings or other terms are finalized. We will keep updating you on QIP as well.

Perfect. Just last question from my side.

Hi, team. Good afternoon.

I had three questions. First, if you can help me with what was the percentage of raw material we purchased from Manorama Africa Limited for FY26 and FY27?

Because for '27, we would have already bought our raw materials.

It's you are asking from the West Africa how much shea nuts we have sourced or how the breakup is requested by you, if you can clear your question, please?

The promoter entity which is there, Manorama Africa Limited, what is the percentage of total RM we have bought? Because last year it was 60%.

For '26 and '27, I want to understand.

Around 20 to 25%, we bought the raw material from Manorama Africa Limited this Financial Year 2025-2026.

For '27, what would it be? It will be depends on this

we will be same line of procurement will be continue.

Understood. CFO sir, one question to you as well.

Our gross margins have fallen from 48 to 43% on a consol basis quarter-on-quarter, whereas on a standalone basis they have remained the same on a QoQ basis. If you can highlight why is this differences arising?

There's a 5% difference on a consol basis.

If you see the gross margin in consol basis, this all subsidiary company just we are newly incorporated this financial year. We are going to streamline all these operations.

Company is expanded to global footprint with established nine subsidiaries across different countries and marking important strategic step towards building a diversified international presence. As this is the first year of operation for most of these entities, initial setup related cost, including employee cost, establishment expenses, and other operating overheads have been higher, which has temporarily impacted consolidated margin.

However, these costs are largely one-time or transitional in nature and are expected to normalize as operation scale up. This investment phase was necessary to support long-term business expansion.

Sir,

I get your point on the operating cost, but why are the gross margin impacted? Because the employee cost and operating cost would come below gross margins.

This is primarily influenced by the freight cost and the other related production cost, which we are making the product. This is just started the operation to subsidiary companies.

Going forward, we see a good number in also subsidiaries. The chemical input cost and other product are increase the cost of production.

We are be confident to maintain going forward all subsidiary company also healthy financials as well.

Just to add to the point sir has made, anything between the 45 to 50% level of gross margin is normal in the parlance of the business model. This we have repeated and emphasized on the past as well.

Anything between this range is considered to be a normal gross profit margin from a company's point of view.

Got it, ma'am. I'll take it offline.

I have one more question. We had posted revised results, what was the error and why did we have to revise our results, if you can highlight?

This, see, sir, this revised financial statement file has been uploaded inadvertently and it's been submitted to ensure accuracy and completeness of the reported information. The revision is purely corrective in nature.

The inadvertently because of the technical issue, the wrong file was uploaded earlier. The company remains committed to maintaining high standards of transparency and timely disclosure.

That is why we have submitted the revised file so soon as we have uploaded the technically wrong file in the stock exchange. For any financial correctness of the matter, you can please consider the revised file financials and those numbers for your further questions, please.

Understood. This were my questions.

Thank you for answering.

My first question is regarding the total fractionation output for FY26. In that, if you could share the stearin and olein split up, that would also help.

For the fractionation output, around 85% stands the utilization on portfolio's basis, out of which we can just share you the volume for our products, main value-added product of stearin and CBE. Stearin volume was around 8,000 reported on a full year, metric tonne around, and CBE volume has been reported around 7,500 metric tonne for full year.

Ma'am, this 85% utilization includes the debottlenecked capacity, right?

No, this doesn't include our debottlenecking facility.

Okay. Regarding the arrangement with Dekel in Brazil, I just want to understand what is the commercial agreement.

Is it a royalty or revenue share model or some tolling fee? Could you just throw some light on that?

No, it's a cost model thing there. It's a processing cost which the company needs to pay them processing of the per tonne of our goods.

There is no agreement in terms of profit sharing which is there with the Dekel agreement. It's just the processing facility which is there.

Just the processing cost.

Yes, just the processing cost.

Okay. In Q3, the contribution was minimal is what you had said.

Maybe for FY26, what was the actual volume in Dekel?

We have just started the Dekel operation. It has been the first quarter, we can say, or the first year of operation in the Brazil through our own processing facilities.

We are still scaling up, but a better number guidance maybe we can give you going forward of this. This is just that we have just started with our Dekel operations currently.

Ma'am, I'll follow up this next quarter or something. Thank you.

Thank you.

Yes, am I audible? Hello?

Yes. Hi, good afternoon, sir.

Sir, my question is on the Dekel. Do we pay the entire year's processing cost upfront at the start of the year, or we pay it as we process it?

Sir,

we pay as we process as per metric tonne. Just for give you an example, if we are processing 100 tonne per month or per day, we are going to pay them accordingly post the processing.

There is no cost which is uploaded upfront on to Dekel arrangement.

Okay. Because subsidiary, if you see, this quarter we had 9 crores of revenue against which we had 5 crores of loss, I was assuming that 14 crores delta is coming from Dekel.

No,

we have just started the minimal volume in Latin America for our own facility. Largely those things are there.

We are capitalizing in terms of operational cost as well. Maybe the correct way will be to look on the consol level in terms of LatAm and other subsidiaries in the coming years.

In the subsequent quarters things will start to cover up as we ramp up. Yeah.

Is that right?

That is right,

sir. Thank you.

Secondly, Ekta, on our long-term goals, the plans that we have say more than 3,500 crores of revenue by FY30 with the upcoming capacity. Are those plans on track and are we confident in achieving those revenue numbers, whatever we are guiding for the long-term basis?

Yes, sir, definitely. We are very confident on whatever plans we have going forward in terms of our capex outline, because if you see we are adding another 75,000 of solvent fractionation capacity, and along with that we are also putting a backward integration process.

We are visionary doing this because we want a very integrated value chain where we just does not scale up our revenue terms, but we have a very healthy operational efficiency as well, which should result in both top line and bottom line as well. Our target is very strong on these numbers, but as a guidance whatever we have given in this past, we are still very confident on achieving that.

The past records with the past records, we are very confident to maintain and do that. Just to add on one more thing that the company has done this year, we are targeting a capex of 460 crores to be spent on 2 to 3 years, but if you see today, the reported financials FY26, we have achieved a significant financial milestone, underscoring the strength and scalability of this business model, because the annual cash gross profit, which include our PAT and depreciation, stood at 258.77 crores, which has already exceeded our gross block of rupees 50 crores.

This indicates us, capital efficiency what the company can do going forward with the planned capex. No,

working capital improvement was really commendable.

Thank you so much. That has been the stress on working cash flow as well, and the company has done a meaningful improvement in that parlance as well.

Just one last question from my side. With the backward integration as in the processing facility in Africa, does that improve the process yield of those seeds because you'll be immediately processing it rather than bringing it to India?

Is that understanding right?

It should improve there when we are crushing and processing the seeds immediately. It will definitely have a better yield compared to what we currently process after 60 days.

The fat output would be better than what we have today.

Yes, along with that, we are also going to save on the logistics cost as well. That is a very good scenario to set to having a processing facility in Burkina Faso for the seeds.

Then oil we'll have to bring it to India, right?

Of course, the butter we will be bringing to India for further value addition process here, like fractionation and everything. The first part of the seeds will be done there only.

Our current facility here India can also optimize our plant on the other Indian exotic seeds, which are sal and mango. It is a dual benefit if we are putting up Burkina Faso plant there.

One, it will be a very helpful in nature for shea nut once we do there, and other, the existing processing facility which we have of 90,000 tonnes of solvent extraction facility here in India will be used and will be a better optimized for Indian exotic seeds like sal and mango kernels and other.

Yeah. From what I understand, you mean the freight cost as a percentage of raw material when it was seed, now it will be oil, so that will be better now.

Yes. Along with the quality.

Thank you.

Good afternoon. Just two things.

One is by the end of FY26, we have added 7,500 tonnes capacity to the solvent fractionation plant. By when are we expecting the balance 4,500 tonnes to be added?

What is the utilization we are expecting for this incremental 12,000 both for this year as well as the next year just to understand on that? Yeah.

Yes, we are expecting that also to be streamlined in this financial year only. We will update you once that also has been done.

Utilization we are expecting of 52,000 tonnes of around 85, 90% for this fiscal year as well. We will update you what utilization we have reached maybe end of this year with the total increased capacity of 52,000 metric tonne.

Got it. Some data points, just wanted to understand in terms of value, what is the CBE contribution to the total revenues and what is the total value-added product mix to our total sales?

So

CBE has contributed around 30% to our top line. Along these are value-added products, stearin, it is around 70, 75% to it.

If you see 30% today what we have done with CBE, it was 10% 2 years ago. The company has also done a very remarkable improvement on improving the product mix for our specialty fats and butters as well.

Great. Just the last thing, what has been the total volume growth for us compared to last year?

Volume growth this Financial Year 2025-2026 around 80 to 90%, and 5 to 10% is the price growth.

Approximately. Price growth.

Okay.

Approximately.

Sure. Thank you so much.

That was it from my end.

Hi. I have one comment and two questions.

One comment about why we are reporting only the standalone results when it comes to the newspaper release or the presentation. Why don't we give the consolidated picture?

Is it because the consolidated number is looking weaker than the standalone number?

Sir, we just want to clarify that in the newspaper we give both standalone and consol figures. It's not that because it is a regulatory requirement which we need to follow for both standalone and consolidated numbers.

There is no standalone number only which is reported in the which is related to the newspaper publication. For press release, there is no regulatory requirement which is there to put up a consolidated number because if you see in the past the subsidiary has been recently formed from company's point of view.

This has been in the first year of operation. Maybe coming forward, we can start a practice of giving a consolidated numbers in press release as well because this has been our past practices of giving a standalone number on press release because there's no regulatory requirement which is there to give consolidated number on press release, but in newspaper there is both reported numbers.

In the seven audited African subsidiaries, we posted a 13 and a half crore losses for FY26, out of which almost 6 crore came in Q4 itself. Is this implying a loss run rate that has doubled in the final quarter?

You've just announced 350 crores in Burkina Faso. Can you tell us for FY26 the subsidiary loss is coming because of what?

Is it the startup cost, is it the forex translation loss, or is it the operating losses in the trading P&L on these entities?

Sir, we have already tried to answer this question in our earlier which was raised, but we are going to repeat the answer for you as well. The company has expanded his subsidiaries in nine geography.

We are running a nine subsidiaries, which the current fiscal FY26 has been the first year of our operation. It is very diversified, not only restricted to West African countries, but we have our operation in LatAm region as well and other geographies as well.

Because this year has been first year of our operation, there has been a, initial setup related cost, operational costs are there, employee costs are there, establishment expenses are there, other operating overheads are also there. This when once you start the company, you have to take the this operational cost which is there.

Going forward, once you see these numbers will be stabilized and this is kind of a nature of one-time and transitional in nature. There is not something that has been going in terms of losses, this you need to understand, sir.

Because

in the end, the consolidated EPS has grown by only 6% compared to almost more than 150% growth that we saw in the previous three quarters.

That is right, but you have to see on a consol level also, including our standalone. If we only talk about consolidated balance sheet, the consolidated EBITDA margin level is around 26% compared to 27% in standalone.

The company is doing fairly well on terms of both, but if you see we have to bear the expenses cost to set up our companies there. That is the understanding we also expect our shareholders to have once we are doing this.

As long as it is one-time expense and you believe that the margins will come back, it seems good. The other question that I had was about the 23.3 crore cumulative month-to-month hit on the forwards in FY26.

You have a 57% export revenue. What is the hedge ratio policy?

Has it been recalibrated after this year's experience?

Sir, because these are the scenario which is there for a time, we cannot say that this will be sustained for lifetime. Yes, we follow a prudent and structured foreign exchange risk management policy, which to minimize the impact of currency volatility on our earnings and cash flow.

Around 60% of our company's net foreign exchange is currently hedged through forward contracts. It also provide earning visibility and protecting against any adverse currency movements.

For the remaining unhedged 40% exposure, the company retains the flexibility to benefit from any favorable movements, which can also be there in the currency rates going forward. That is the practice which company does, but it doesn't harm the company's core level of business in terms of that.

For anything which is there on currency level, we are having a very prudent risk management policy, which covers both and protects us on any volatility, and we can also get benefit out of our unhedged exposure which is there because we have a natural hedge also in terms of import and export.

Okay. Thank you.

Hi, sir. I just wanted to understand couple of things.

Most of my questions got answered, but yeah, we did debottlenecking, right? Currently our capacity should be almost around 52,000 metric tonnes.

In the presentation we mentioned it is 47,500. Can I understand what's the reason?

Yes, sir. To give you a better clarification of this, we have two solvent fractionation plants.

Solvent fractionation 1 plant is of 15,000 tonnes, solvent fractionation 2 plant is of 25,000 tonnes. The debottlenecking of 30% has been done on 25,000 solvent fractionation plant.

That is how it resulted total fractionation is 47,500.

Got it. Then the new debottlenecking of addition 15,000 will not be any cost.

There is no any cost to that. Okay.

Not much. That is a plant under 8 to 10 crores of cost, which is there for both.

Perfect. Now can I understand one more thing, in the meanwhile of the conversation only you mentioned that we will be doing a volume growth of 20% to 30% plus, and the price also will be hide by will be hiked by another 5 percentage.

That means that for the next year when it comes to FY27, which is the current running year, the run rate should be very good. It's what you are clearly mentioning.

Can I understand on this, what kind of volumes will be done or not volumes, but at least fractionation, how much utilization that you are thinking in this financial year for getting something a great number?

We are targeting and aiming to utilize around 85, 90% of our 85% plant on our 52,000 tonnes full capacity. That is the kind of utilization we are targeting for this fiscal year.

Should be around 85%.

52,000 tonnes ka 80% is what you are mentioning, that means that is 41,600 you are talking about.

Yes,

and then

we will update you quarter to quarter how has been the progress on it.

Perfect. Just for a clarity purpose only, I understand this closely by looking at from so long, cocoa prices is no relation with our CBE prices, but still in this recent quarter we had a margin dip that I understand that it is coming through the African companies and setoffs.

Is it going back to normalization situations? Can I understand it will go back to 27, 28, or 25 to 4 30% money?

Sir, see, we always have guided you on our sustainable margins range earlier, which was around 25 to 27. The company is well within that range even in the consol level, which we have reported 26% of EBITDA margin there also.

There is no significant margin dip which we the company has reported, be it on consol level or be it on standalone numbers. There could be a minor range which you have to take into consideration of around 45 to 50% on gross margin level and 25 to 27% on EBITDA level.

This has been the management stance in our various past track records for our guidance purpose. Anything well within this range should be considered normally from a business point of view.

Of course, we are there working on many levers to improve the margins going forward, but then we will update you once we have the visibility of the same.

Perfect. Last question from my side.

sure.

Hi. My question is for FY26, we have seen a 230 bps margin expansion.

Is this all because of better product mix, value-added product mix, or efficiency of the manufacturing plant, and mix of both?

Thank you for the question. To answer it, yes, it is a mix of both.

We have, if you see, our value-added product mix in terms of CBE was around 10% 1, 2 years back. It is now 30% today.

That also has repo resulted into the improved metrics on our financial, and also the higher utilization of our plant has resulted into this. There is a combination of all practices which has been attributing to these levels.

Okay. One suggestion, can we include in our PPT OER, oil extraction ratio, okay?

I have seen all the palm oil company used to show that number. Oh

sorry, oil extraction

Oil extraction This yeah, OER.

OER. We will see this internally to see what is OER, and we will take the actions accordingly as per company's policy.

Okay. Thank you, Ekta.

Thank you.

Thank you, sir.

Thank you for the opportunity and congratulations on a great set of numbers. Most of my questions have already been answered, but I just wanted to get clarity on the margin side.

You mentioned that 25 to 25 7% is a sustainable margin going ahead. Is it a yearly guidance or is a quarter-to-quarter?

Sir, we from business point of view, we will request all our shareholders of course, we understand that you have a quarterly metrics to compare and do it, but if from our side, we try to focus on our yearly metrics. That is there.

We try to maintain on quarter-to-quarter basis, but whatever guidance we try to give, we will request our shareholders to take on year-on-year basis.

Okay. Thank you, ma'am.

Also the remaining 4,500 metric tonne debottlenecking is expected to be happening in this quarter or the coming quarters going ahead?

That is under way, sir. Once we have implemented that, then we will share the disclosure of that.

That is under way of doing it. We will dis update you once it is done.

Okay. Just the last question, ma'am.

What is our Middle East exposure that you had mentioned? I missed that in the call.

Middle East exposure only 2 to 3% of total revenue.

Okay. Thank you so much, and all the best.

Thank you, sir.

My dear friends and my stakeholders, on behalf of the entire management team, I would like to sincerely thank all participants for joining Manorama Industries' Q4 and Financial Year 2026 earnings conference call. As we all know, business is business and there is always a risk, but our last many years of performance is proven and is on your record.

Manorama Industries continues to solidify its position as a reliable supplier, committed to meeting the fast-growing global demand for sustainable cocoa butter equivalents, specialty fats, stearin, and exotic butters. We are executing with focus and conviction on a clear laid-down strategy: expansion of manufacturing capacity to address growing demand for our specialty fat products and value-added scientifically made and jointly collaborated with customers specialty fats; investment in research and development, which is key to our success, to expand specialty fat formulations and application-specific products; strengthening our sourcing capabilities in key raw material regions with robust supply chains; expanding global market presence through international subsidiaries and strategic partnerships; optimization of operational efficiency across the whole integrated value chain.

Our target is to make every human on this earth somewhere our customer. We remain committed to becoming the partner of a choice for both international and the domestic customers, delivering quality, reliability, sustainability, and trust at every level of our operations.

We look forward to continued engagement with our investor and analyst community and remain available for follow-up discussions. I thank all our stakeholders, our suppliers, our tribal families, our Manorama team members, and every person associated with Manorama.

Thank you once again for your time, for your trust, and your continued support. Thank you.