Good morning. Good morning to everyone.

I'd like to start by expressing my appreciation for your presence today. Joining me are Mr.

P. Srinivasan, our Chief Financial Officer, and our investor relations advisers from SGA.

I hope you've all received our investor presentation. If not, it's available on both the stock exchanges and our company website.

Let me begin by providing an overview of the company's performance for quarter one, financial year '27. We started financial year '27 on a strong note with revenue from operations reaching ₹403 crores, reflecting an impressive 20% year-on-year growth driven by growing volumes and increase in selling prices on account of increase in raw material costs.

The company delivered a healthy 9% volume growth compared to quarter one financial year '26, driven by sustained demand across key end markets. Domestic volumes registered double-digit growth supported by improved demand from the implementation of GST 2.0.

Export volumes also recorded single-digit growth driven by successful conversion of ongoing customer engagements into business gains and continued traction in international markets. This balanced performance across both domestic and export businesses highlights our ability to capitalize on market opportunities, while strengthening customer relationships and expanding our global footprint.

While we are encouraged by these results, we also remain realistic about the operating environment. Global markets continue to experience geopolitical uncertainties, supply chain disruptions, and a competitive pricing landscape.

On a sequential basis, revenue grew by a robust 22% over the previous quarter. Volumes, however, witnessed a moderate decline of 3%, primarily due to temporary supply-side constraints related to utilities and logistical challenges arising from the ongoing geopolitical situation, which resulted in the postponement of certain order commitments.

These challenges were operational in nature rather than demand-driven, with underlying customer demand remaining healthy. We did see a temporary demand contraction in the non-tyre segment due to lower production on account of a sharp increase in input costs and shortage of labour due to the cooking gas shortages during the quarter.

We continue to work closely with our suppliers and logistics partners to normalise supplies and execute the pending orders, and we remain confident of recovering the deferred volumes in the coming quarters. With respect to the anti-dumping petitions filed with the Government of India, the central government has approved the imposition of anti-dumping duty on sulfonamides covering both CBS and NS on 20th June 2026.

On the other product front, the PILFLEX 13, the Director General of Trade Remedies, DGTR, issued a positive final recommendation in June 2026. The implementation of the anti-dumping duty on PILFLEX 13 is now subject to the approval of the Government of India.

The tyre industry continued to witness healthy domestic demand during the quarter, supported by strong replacement demand and healthy OEM offtake across both the passenger and commercial vehicle segments, still aided by the implementation of GST 2.0 and ongoing infrastructure activities. While some moderation in demand is expected in the near term owing to seasonal factors and the progress of the monsoon, these are expected to be temporary in nature.

The underlying industry fundamentals remain strong, supported by healthy replacement demand, continued momentum in OEM volumes, and favorable long-term growth drivers. Accordingly, the overall demand outlook remains positive, and the industry is well positioned to navigate the near-term challenges while sustaining its long-term growth trajectory.

In the international tyre markets, even as the overall volumes showed a minor dip in the first half of the calendar year, mainly on account of lower OEM volumes, the replacement market held positive, reflecting a healthy demand. Coming back to NOCIL, trial production at our new TDQ plant in Dahej is coming along well with initiation of samples to customers.

As approvals progress and commercial supplies ramp up over time, we believe this investment will further reinforce our competitive position in the market. Our new ₹130 crore investment in Dahej is also progressing well, and our teams have done a great job of keeping it on track, in spite of the challenges and disruptions we've been witnessing on account of the war in the last few months.

As we look to expand our product portfolio, our R&D and technology teams are working very closely with customers on new products, and we expect positive traction during the course of the year. Looking ahead, while we remain mindful of the uncertainties that continue to exist in the global environment, we are optimistic about the direction in which the business is progressing.

We expect revenue for financial year '27 to be in the range of ₹1,400 to ₹1,600 crores vis-à-vis the current pricing environment, with EBITDA in the region of 10%. Our focus will remain on executing our strategy with discipline, driving operational excellence, expanding our product portfolio, deepening customer relationships, and maintaining a prudent financial management.

With this, I now invite Mr. P.

Srinivasan to provide an overview of our financial performance. Following his remarks, we will be pleased to take your questions.

Thank you, Mr. Anand, and good morning to everyone.

Now let's run through the consolidated key financial highlights. The sales volume for Q1 FY27 was 145 index taking a base of 100 as Q1 FY20.

Revenue: the net revenue from operations for Q1 FY27 stood at ₹403 crores, registering a strong growth of 20% Y-o-Y from ₹336 crores in Q1 FY26 and 22% Q-o-Q from ₹330 crores in Q4 FY26. Volumes: as Anand stated, volumes recorded a healthy 9% Y-o-Y growth in Q1 FY27 compared with Q1 FY26, while we witnessed a moderate 3% sequential decline compared to Q4 FY26 due to temporary supply-side constraints and other logistics issues.

On the operating EBITDA performance, EBITDA for Q1 FY27 stood at ₹45 crores, registering a strong growth of 48% Y-o-Y from ₹31 crores in Q1 FY26 and 115% Q-o-Q from ₹21 crores in Q4 FY26. EBITDA margins for Q1 FY27 stood at 11.2%, expanding by 210 basis points Y-o-Y compared to Q1 FY26 and about by 480 basis points Q-o-Q compared to Q4 FY26.

Profit before tax, PBT, for Q1 FY27 stood at ₹37 crores, registering a strong growth of 60% Y-o-Y from ₹23 crores in Q1 FY26 and 77% Q-o-Q from ₹21 crores in Q4 FY26. Profit after tax for Q1 '27 stood at ₹28 crores, registering a strong growth of 61% Y-o-Y from ₹17 crores in Q1 FY26 and 63% Q-o-Q from ₹17 crores in Q4 FY26.

With this, we would like to open the floor for questions.

Yeah. Sir, good morning, and congratulations on a very good set of numbers.

Sir, few questions to ask. Sir, as you mentioned in your opening remarks that because of the supply-side challenges, we could see a moderate dip in our Q-on-Q volumes by close to around 3%.

I presume that this quarter would have some benefit of the low-cost RMC also. Moving into Q3, Q2, Q3, how do you see the EBITDA run rate which we have achieved this quarter?

Do you believe that this EBITDA run rate can be more of a sustainable number which we should work with, given the fact that any dip in the gross margins per kg could be compensated through the benefits of operating leverage which we could see through higher volumes?

Thank you, Neerav. Like I mentioned in my speech, while there could be a bit of small adjustments in the EBITDA, overall for the year with a combination of the volume growth also kind of kicking in, as well as operating leverages, we expect to hover around 10% of EBITDA.

That's our expectation.

Sir, what sort of volume growth we have assumed in this top-line number which you have mentioned?

Around 10%, yeah.

Okay, 10% for the full year.

Yes.

Correct. Also, sir, on the conversion cost side, what we could see that this quarter our conversion cost on a sequential basis has gone up from ₹110 crores to ₹130 crores.

One of the reason could be the employee cost, which normally we have seen in first quarter of every financial year there is an increase. Excluding that part, were there any non-recurring expenses which won't be repeated in quarters to come?

If you can just highlight this increase in the conversion cost which has happened this quarter.

Neerav, Srinivas here. Thank you for the question.

Basically there are a few things which is there. One is, in this quarter as we witnessed the Middle East war crisis, we had logistics challenges.

Obviously, the freight rates went up, there was some increase on account of that, which if the economic situation stabilizes, hopefully this corrections will happen. Till such time this crisis remains, you will see an inflated cost on that.

Secondly, our commitments towards CSR is on the higher side in the first quarter, though at the end of the year it evens out, but since the expenditure is already incurred, there was some additional money spent on CSR. Thirdly, there were some challenges on the utility front.

We are all aware the gas prices went up significantly because of the Middle East crisis, gas availability issue was there, operational constraints were imposed by the regulatory bodies because we had to operate the plant at certain throughput rates. Based on that, some additional costs came in in the utility front.

We also had a manufacturing improvement in volume terms. If you see in the stock change, there is a ₹45 crores credit in the stock change, so that also played a role.

Lastly, there were some maintenance issues at our plant, so that also had led to some inflated costs, which we feel those things will get evened out. These are all one-off expenses.

I think this is a broader story which you can hear reasons.

Correct, sir. If you can just quantify what could be this one-off cost which won't be repeated in the next quarter, including the employee cost which we have seen on a higher side this quarter.

Employee cost I think will get stabilized. That hopefully will come down because generally the retirement gets loaded in the valuation as and when the increments get rolled out.

As far as the utility cost, I think this is purely the pricing because as and when the oil prices stabilize, hopefully the utility costs will come down. A few crores will come down on account of this one-off maintenance costs, etc., that will be a one-time expenses which will not be repeated.

Correct. Sir, last from my side.

What we have seen that you mentioned that the approvals from the customers in so far as the TDQ plant is concerned we have started getting the samples approved from the customers. In best of our understanding, when can we see the volumes coming from the TDQ plant materially for NOCIL?

What could be those period and can this improvement in volumes from TDQ plant can take our run rate to or the indexation to let's say 160, 165 in quarter four of FY27? Can that numbers be workable, sir?

It takes typically around 6 to 8 months, right, which we've been talking, sometimes even lesser. We should start seeing it start trickling in quarter four, but more going into quarter one of next year is when I see the numbers coming in.

I think we should start seeing those first things coming in in quarter four, yeah.

Correct. What was the mix of export and domestic volumes in first quarter, if you can just share the mix?

In the first quarter, we see exports is about 33%, roughly 33%, and domestic 67%.

This is the volume part you are mentioning, sir, right?

Yeah.

Perfect, sir. Thank you, sir, and wish the team all the best for the future.

Thank you. Thank you.

Hi. Thanks for the opportunity.

I had a few questions. The first one was on the volumes.

While you have alluded to logistical challenges, etc., impacting volumes, but I think from a Q4 perspective, we were talking about Q4 being a base and improvement from there, and also in terms of exports, we were expecting a double-digit kind of a volume growth expectation for the year. Versus that, if I look at your overall FY27 volume, what you're talking about, about 10%, has there been a revision downwards internally due to the evolving geopolitical situation?

Is that what is driving the overall volume growth expectation for FY27, or is it driven by reassessment on the domestic front? If you could throw some light on that.

Yeah. There has been some kind of small impact on the non-tyre sector in the quarter, but not necessarily in the tyre, and there we see still the robust demand continuing.

We've not kind of scaled down. We still see that for the full year compared to financial year '26, we should keep up the 10% growth rate.

I don't see that flagging. We've not kind of scaled down the numbers in any way as yet.

Understood. On the antioxidant front, if I look at the import data on antioxidant, there seems to be a increase in import volumes there, and realizations seem to, on a Y-o-Y basis, continue to contract on the antioxidant front.

In light of the fact that TDQ, that ADD was not approved by the ministry specifically, right? Your TDQ volumes are from this new facility.

How do you see this entire antioxidant space playing out? If you could throw some light on that in light of all this development, continued dumping, continued fall in realizations, and that ADD was not approved by the ministry.

So.

For TDQ, we are looking at both increase in volumes in the domestic market as well as in the international markets. Given the fact that it has a wide range of applicability not only limited to tyres, but also the non-tyre sector, we see that there are sufficient opportunities to grow it, in spite of the fact that we didn't get the anti-dumping.

Like we had also mentioned earlier, we do keep having and structuring plans for different scenarios. We still have a road map to continue to grow the volumes both in the tyre and the non-tyre sector, albeit given the domestic as well as in the international markets, yeah.

How do you plan to counter this increased dumping on the antioxidant front and the falling realizations, if you could?

We've not seen a significant change in the import numbers, because we have limited visibility on that. We don't see a significant increase in influx on account of any of these anti-dumping changes that are happening, yeah.

Understood. On accelerators, there was a I think recent announcement that one of your large Chinese competitors, China Sunsine, was putting up additional capacity in one of the accelerators.

If you could throw some light on how that could impact pricing or volumes on that front.

That was also one of the reasons that we had approached for the anti-dumping on the accelerators. Those capacities you're referring to was also one of the intermediates to the main accelerators.

We have a position both not only in domestic, but also with international customers on that front. We are able to compete at this point with also the anti-dumping duty now that's in place, yeah.

Understood. Lastly, you have referred to the geopolitical situation and logistics impacting or pushing out volumes from this quarter.

Do you see any improvement on that front in this current quarter, what you're seeing, or do you continue to see uncertainty? If you could throw some light on that.

Yeah. There is continued uncertainty definitely on the front of raw materials.

I think you have to take those calls because it does keep moving up and down, like it has happened in the last few weeks depending on the geopolitical situation. We're not seeing any significant impact on demand as yet.

We still see it as positive. There is going to be this uncertainty on pricing of raw materials and availability as something that we'll need to keep a close watch on, yeah.

Understood. Thanks for that response.

Thank you. Thank you.

Thank you, sir, for the opportunity, and congrats on a good set of performance. Sir, just a couple of questions.

Sir, in your opening remarks, you mentioned some ₹1,400 to ₹1,600 crore top-line number for '27, and you also mentioned some 10% margins. That comes out to ₹140 to ₹160 crore.

Sir, when we look compared to '26, you're talking of 10% volume growth. Ideally, we are talking of some around 30% to 40% pricing growth.

That means, just to know more onto the pricing part, are we assuming war-related benefits of higher realization that would sustain going ahead, or it is also the anti-dumping duty benefits coming in from the sulfonamides accelerator, or the better product mix? Which are the factors which you are keeping in perspective of 30% to 40% higher realization growth?

It's a combination of all, which is surely like you mentioned, we'll have to get also realistic. There is expected to be some moderation.

It will not be at the same level as quarter one, but there will be some moderation. It's a combination of volume, also product mix, also coming from the fact that better price realization in the domestic markets for accelerators, and operating leverages that will come.

Yeah.

Sir, is that possible to quantify the inventory gains during the quarter? Any ballpark numbers would help.

Let me just check, but maybe not right away. We can kind of come back to you on this later, yeah.

Got it, sir. Sir, during the quarter, a 9% Y-o-Y growth, and you also mentioned the non-tyre segment that is more of a subdued as of now.

Sir, when we look at the commentary of the India's largest latex player, they have stated that demand is quite good, and they have also been able to take the price increase. Ideally, whatever demand commentary they have given, so that looks good, but we are saying it is more of a subdued.

Anything, sir, you can correlate?

What I was mentioning also was it was kind of a transitionary element, a temporary nature. Again, when you speak about non-tyre is multiple subsegments, right?

It's not one latex, but there are multiple subsegments. There's also a high dependency in those smaller companies on contract labour, and also when input cost went up, many of them also had to cease production for some time.

These things played out in the quarter, but it was more transitionary, and we expect that demand to kind of come back.

Okay. Sir, the 9% volume growth in this quarter on Y-o-Y basis, sir, possible to state how much was from the tyre side and non-tyre side?

Like I had mentioned, it was more skewed towards the tyre sector, lesser on the non-tyre side, yeah.

Lesser on the non-tyre side. Got it.

Sir, then one last question. Sir, onto the promoter holding side, we have seen recently the promoter holdings are being pledged again.

One of the promoter, biggest promoter their holdings are pledged by roughly around 24%. Anything, sir, you can take up?

Why is the promoter holding again getting pledged?

I think we can't comment on that. That's their office's call, we prefer to remain noncommittal on that.

Got it, sir. Thank you.

That's it from my side.

Hello. Am I audible?

My question was on ADD that was recently approved. My question was how much realization gain we have gained right after this ADD?

Sorry, the ADD has been notified on 20th June, for the quarter ended June, I think there is no gain there. I think it will get eventually panned out, because it all depends on how much the foreign import producers absorb that.

We will derive only at the end of the quarter, not today. As far as the quarter ended June, nothing is there.

Thank you.

Hi, sir. Thank you for taking my question.

For the Q1 growth that we had, can you quantify how much was volume-led and price-led? Can we expect the realizations to sustain in the coming quarters?

Let me just check on the split, but on the realization outlook, I'd given an indication that it's the slight moderation, but overall for the year we expect EBITDA to be at a certain range. In terms of the split that we've given, just one second, please.

I think we already announced in our opening remarks that Q1 volume growth was 9% as compared to the previous year's first quarter. As far as the sequential quarter, we are having a moderate decline of -3% as far as the volume parameter's concerned.

As far as the revenue parameters, I think we mentioned about 22% 20 to 23% for the relevant comparable periods.

Sir. Another question.

The TDQ plant, are we expecting any revenues to come in this year?

Excuse me, your voice is not so clear. Can you just repeat that, please?

Is it better now?

Yes.

From the TDQ plant, are we expecting any revenues to come in this year?

Yes, yes. There will be revenues coming in this year, yeah.

What utilizations will be hit?

No, like I'd mentioned, we have an approval process. We will start with the non-tyre, both domestic as well as international, and gradually tyre companies, as they start approving, those volumes will start coming in in the next couple of quarters, yeah.

Sir. Thank you.

Hi. Thanks again for the opportunity.

My question was on PX-13 ADD that was approved by DGTR recently. In the previous time that the DGTR had approved it in '21, the ministry had kind of rejected the appeal at that time.

What do you think is different this time which could possibly result in a different outcome in terms of the overall application and the outcome, if you could throw some light on that?

See, this is central government's prerogative. As per the provisions of the statute, the DGTR is a recommendatory authority.

This is a quasi-judicial investigation proceedings wherein all the stakeholders' views are taken into account, and then a very detailed order is given. Prima facie, the DGTR is convinced that there's a dumping, and therefore there is a applicable ADD finalization, or recommendation has been given.

However, the central government looks at things beyond that, and they have some other issues also in terms of public interest and other national interest. They have within their jurisdictional power to accept, reject whatever they wish to, and typically these powers are exercised within a window of 90 days as per the statute.

Today we cannot comment what is the view of the central government, because it's purely discretionary in their regime. We are hopeful that we will make adequate representation wherever is needed to substantiate our case.

Now we will wait for the outcome maybe by end September.

Just to add on that, Praveen. I think the environment also is very clear, because this is a very long, 15-month to 18-month investigation where the dumping and injury margins are very strongly backed.

We are quite positive that it will be seen in the positive light, yeah.

I appreciate what you're saying. I just want to understand that, see, I understand that the government will look at various factors, all of which cannot be enumerated.

I wanted to understand more from a industry perspective that what has changed in terms of capacity or profitability of the product, etc., which could make a difference this time? That was my question.

I understand that there are other factors the government might look at which you may not have a solid view on, right? In terms of the other parameters, like industry capacity in the product or profitability of product, etc., has there been a substantial change between the last application and now?

Yes, yes. Actually if you see, something like this, the product that you refer to can be catered to entirely by domestic manufacturing, and clearly all domestic producers are under stress as far as on account of the dumping that's happening.

That's quite clear. Even compared to the previous period, it is even more severe, yeah, to answer your question.

Understood. Thanks for that.

My second question was: in the last several months, the INR has depreciated against both the USD as well as the Chinese yuan, right? Specifically, because a lot of our products we compete with the Chinese, has there been a specific depreciation benefit that we are seeing in terms of volumes and conversations with the clients in the export markets, and also on the domestic front in terms of the Chinese imports being costlier?

Not any significant change, Praveen, yeah. Yes, you're absolutely right on the data point that you mentioned, but we have not seen a significant impact on account of that, yeah.

Okay. Is that because the Chinese players are continuing to adjust their yuan prices downwards, and is that partly the reason?

Yes, yes. That's right.

That's right. Still I think rubber chemicals is still a product group that still enjoys the export subsidy, yeah.

Understood. Thanks for the response.

Thank you.

Thanks again, sir, for the opportunity. Sir, my question was onto the anti-dumping duty part.

Sir, excluding for TDQ, considering like CBS, NS, we have the duty, considering this PILFLEX 13 also if that duty is notified, what could be the total top line that would be covered under the ADD, excluding for the TDQ segment?

This should be totally about 25% to 30%, yeah.

25% to 30%. Okay.

Sir, just for the benefits of ADD that would be flowing to EBITDA, would it be of the similar quantum which we have seen in the last cycle, or it would be slightly lower from that? Any sort of a directional guidance?

It's a bit premature today. Let all the calculations see, and then how the results come in in the second quarter, third quarter, then we can probably comment on that.

It's too premature to comment today, because we don't know how much the foreign players will absorb, those things need to be seen.

Got it, sir. Sir, my second question was onto the exports part, like you mentioned it is at around 33%.

Any target, sir, we are looking for '28, '29 to take it to around 40%, 45%?

Directionally you're right, Aditya, that's the way it will go. Because also from our presence in the international markets, that will be the direction it will go, yeah.

Got it. Sir, the newer expansion which will come 1 to 2 years down the line, like you mentioned in last quarter, that is more focused onto the specialty segments.

How you see that segment to move on, from the current 15% overall top-line levels? This specialty portion, how much potential it has to move from this levels to around say just around 20%, 25%?

That should add to that. I would expect at least another 5% to 10% we should see an additional, yeah.

5% to 10%. Okay.

Yeah.

Got it, sir. Thank you.

That's it from my side.

Thank you.

Thank you. Thank you everybody for your time.

On behalf of the entire NOCIL team, I would like to thank our customers for their continued trust, our employees for their unwavering commitment, our board for its guidance, and our shareholders for their continued support and confidence. I hope we've been able to address all your queries.

For any further information, kindly get in touch with any one of us or Strategic Growth Advisors, our investor relations advisers. Thank you once again, and wishing everyone a very pleasant afternoon.