Appear ASA

Appear ASA

30.20
NOK
-0.60
(-1.95%)
2.29EPS
32.16P/E
2.99BMarket Cap
Oct 29Next Earn

Q4 FY2025 · Earnings Call TranscriptFebruary 12, 2026

Thomas Jørgensen

[Growth?] story, we're going to go into Q4 in depth, we're going to share some success stories, and then my CFO, Per Øyvind Stene, is going to go through some of the financials for Q4 and '25 in a bit more detail.

Then finally at the end, we're going to do a live Q&A, live this time. We're taking feedback, and it's going to be Teams-based, and you basically have to raise your hand, and then the moderator will let you know that you can ask the question, we have a bit of order.

All right. Let's get into it.

We'll start with the Q4 2025 highlights. We had a strong quarter.

The revenue came in at 184.6, which is 20.8% up year-on-year. Growth in Q4 was really driven by strong activity in the EMEA and APAC markets, based on the normal drivers that we see in our business, which is rights renewals, upgrades by leagues, and kind of driven by larger investment in live production infrastructure.

The gross margin for the quarter came in at a strong 73%. It's slightly down from the same period last year.

That's largely based on the US tariffs, but which was mostly compensated by positive product mix, as we'll come back to later. The underlying EBITDAC came in at 12.6 million, which equals a 6.8% margin.

Just a repetition here, we use EBITDAC where this C stands for capitalized development expenses, EBITDAC is EBITDA less capitalized development expenses. We use that as a measure to make sure that you can compare our profitability with our historic numbers where you can compare them with the EBITDA essentially.

We started capitalizing in 2025. We're using the underlying measure because we IPO-ed last year, and we have quite significant cost related to the IPO, 12 10.5 to be specific.

When we use underlying EBITDAC, we are reporting without the impact of the IPO-related one-off costs. The free cash flow ended at minus 14.4, which is down 8 million year-on-year.

This was again strongly impacted by the IPO-related cost and then also increased capital investment as we are heavily investing in a strong platform for many years of future growth going forward. Now, if you look at the full-year 2025, revenues came in at a very strong 800.9, 801 million NOK, which is up a whopping 32.3% year-on-year.

That is in line with the guidance that we provided during the IPO process, and is driven by sort of broad growth across our regions, and really expansion within a lot of the tier one premium live sports accounts that we have developed, and that we are expanding within, as we'll get into a bit further as well. Gross margin came in at 72.3%, which is exactly the same as 2024.

Again, we're seeing sort of adverse effects, obviously, from US tariffs, but it's being compensated by our product mix and our ability to kind of balance those things out. We're really happy about that.

The full-year underlying EBITDAC came in at 142.2, which is 17 or which equals 17. 17.8% margin.

This is within the range that we're guiding EBITDAC, which is between 17 and 20, and it really shows that the operating leverage that our business has as we kind of scale and grow really helps drive strong profitability. We plan to keep the business in that sort of 17% 17% to 20% interval.

In terms of free cash flow, we have strong earnings and cash generation. We had free cash flow at 64.2, which is up 8% year-on-year, and it really adds to our increased available liquidity, which Per Øyvind is going to come back to a bit later as well.

Now, I think it's important to kind of retell the Appear growth story. We're the new kid on the block on the Oslo Stock Exchange.

Just a bit of a reminder of which market we're playing in and which role Appear has in that market. A quick glance at 2025.

We had 270 270 active customers, and at the end of 2025, we were 225 people. We launched two new significant products at the back end of last year: the X5, which is the solution that we're offering into acquisition for the long tail of tier two events, and the VX platform, which is our software-based platform for production processing.

If you follow the company, you might have known that we won a lot of industry awards last year as well, particularly happy with the ones that we were awarded at the big shows and the big events. Typically, we get awarded for our products and technology, which are absolute industry-leading, particularly in this tier one market.

Our global footprint, the way our company is set up is obviously headquarters in Norway, at Lilleaker in Oslo. We manufacture our products at Hapro, our contract manufacturer in Oslo.

Most of our engineers are based in Oslo. Then we have a direct sales organization through our wholly owned subsidiaries in Southampton now to cover the EMEA markets, LA to cover the Americas, and out of Singapore to cover Asia Pacific.

Then we also have a development setup that is growing in Stockholm in Sweden. Technical issue here.

Oh, there we go. Let's see.

All right. The market that we play in is live production technology, and the way we define it is basically any technology, hardware, software, and services that are deployed between the cameras on the stadium, the racetrack, the venue, and that sort of produced content ending up at the consumer's screen at the home or at the mobile.

We typically split it in three different subsegments. We split it into acquisition, which is the technology deployed at the stadium or at the racetrack used to capture all the video feeds, video streams, and the audio, compress it, process it, and transport it to where the content is produced.

The middle part is production processing, and that's really content production. It's all the applications and used to create sort of live workflows to mix audio, video, graphics to create the finished goods.

It's the product that we watch. Then the final phase is consumption.

That's really where that finished product, the finished feed is delivered to consumers, to viewers, either via linear distribution, traditional linear TV, or via OTT, which is essentially streaming. That's the market that we play in.

Now, this is a large market. This is a $5.5 billion addressable market.

If you look to the right, you see kind of how we previously split it in acquisition, processing, and consumption. Appear predominantly operates in acquisition and processing, less so in consumption.

The acquisition and processing markets are growing to some extent. Between 4% and 5% going forward is the estimate.

We're obviously growing much faster than the market. Now, below we've kind of indexed on the customer types, and you'll see, and I'll get to the fact that this market is highly driven by the leagues and the rights owners.

That's really where most of the value comes from. It comes from the leagues and the rights owners and the customer's willingness to pay for content that is produced and driven from those rights.

The main business of the leagues and the rights owners is selling and monetizing the rights, but many of them also acquire, process, and deliver their own content, they are in their own rights also broadcasters. Now, the main customers of the leagues and the rights owners are the sports broadcasters and the media rights holders.

They buy the right to monetize content, and they pay a lot of money for it, as we'll get to. There's of course an ongoing fight amongst the sports broadcasters for end-user subscriptions.

The streamers, Amazon, Netflix, Apple, Disney, they're all getting into the sports broadcasting business because this is highly valuable content that consumers want and demand more and more of. There's a big dynamic in there.

Then you have another customer type for us, which is connectivity providers. That's the telcos or the companies that provide connectivity between the stadium and where content is produced, or between content production and delivery.

Then you have a range of company that we call production services companies that typically offer managed services around content production. It's a very sort of specialized operation and a set of workstreams and technologies.

Again, the consumer demand for top-tier sports rights is growing, and hence is the value of the sports rights. You'll see that market growing, and it's really interesting to look on the right where you see the top-tier sports account for a very large portion of the total value.

It's of course very important to be part of the ecosystem around this rights holders because that's where a lot of that value flows from a business perspective. If you look at the triggers for Appear, what triggers investment in Appear, it's important to understand that for the broadcasters and the streamers and the companies investing in creating viewing experiences, they have to compete for subscriptions, as I said earlier, and they do that by increasing the production value, right?

They have to invest in a better product to sell, but also then a cheapest possible way of having it delivered, which is operational efficiencies. What we see in terms of triggers, right, is that the leagues and the federations, the owners, they have an annual cycle of where they play, basically, and where they don't play.

In this sort of annual recurring market, they typically invest in more production value and in operational efficiency every single year. This is an ongoing battle.

In addition to that, you have a lot of other, let's say, triggers for this type of investment. You have some of the non-league, but annual global events like Super Bowl, Tour de France, Stanley Cup.

You have biannual or quadrennial global events, the Olympics, Commonwealth Games, FIFA World Cup. Then you have another category, which is media rights renewals.

When media rights are either renewed or they change hands, that unleashes a huge amount of investments in the entire ecosystem around the rights. Then you also have regulatory change and industry consolidation.

Netflix looking to buy Warner Bros., that drives a lot of investments, but also the shutdown of C-band, which drives investment in technology that moves contribution or distribution of live from satellites to the internet. All right.

Let's have a quick look at Q4 in more depth. As you'll see from this, we've had a really consistent strong growth trend for many years now.

From Q4 '21 to Q4 '25, we've had a CAGR, an annual growth rate, at 33%, which we're super happy about. That means that we've also had 11 quarters of year-on-year growth from Q2 '23 to Q4 2025.

There's no indication that our growth is sort of substantially slowing down. We see a strong continuing demand for our solutions going forward.

If you look more into sort of decomposing Q4, you see the trend that in the revenue by product type, we have increasing revenues from software and support. That's really great for us because that helps support our gross margin and profitability.

If you look into the regions, you'll see that the Americas had a 10% decline from last year, from Q4 '24 to Q4 '25. That really only reflects timing of revenue recognition, which can be impacted by larger deals.

The full-year growth came in at a solid 18 18.3%. Again, the underlying development in the market is strong and positive.

Can also note that several of the larger deals that we've done in the Americas in '25 was long-term support contracts, which gets sort of revenue recognized over several years instead of at the point of delivery. For EMEA, we have a super strong Q4, 66% year-on-year growth and a whopping 45% full-year growth.

This is really a testament to kind of refining and kind of fully implementing the direct sales model that we've had very, very strong success with in the US market. Then obviously, APAC with the establishment of our commercial entity in Singapore is showing very good signs of growth, but of course from a relatively small base currently.

We do expect to see continued strong growth in that region and actually, in fairness, in all regions. All right.

Q4 '25, as I said earlier, was the third-highest quarter that Appear has ever delivered, and with this consistent gross margin. The increase quarter-on-quarter was 20.8% year-on-year, and that's actually a much better, let's say, exit velocity into 2026 than we had into 2025 from '24.

The underlying EBITDAC, again, at 12.6 million, excluding the 10.5 million in IPO-related one-off expenses, and with a product mix that contributes to this consistent 73% gross margin, which really helps us keep our profitability. We're really happy that we're able to kind of keep our gross margin at that level even though we've had some headwinds both with US tariffs and with forex.

Right. A question we get often is, where did growth come from in 2025?

We're trying to kind of break it down a bit for you here. If you look on the left, in terms of customer concentration, our tier one customers still remain sort of a significant contributor.

That is really part of our strategy. We have the strategy of expanding within our big tier one accounts.

There's a lot to gain from that. We do have a sort of a reliance, obviously, of our top five customers, but that sort of reliance on the top five and top 10 is reduced over time if you look back to 2022.

In terms of new and existing, again, most of our business is coming from existing customers, although some from new, and that is definitely part of the strategy, and it really reflects on the very strong relationship we have with these global tier one customers, and that is a very big asset for us. Then of course, in terms of product mix, most of the revenue came from the X platform, which is our big winner in the acquisition market, and as planned and as communicated earlier.

You'll see that kind of mix changing a bit now as we move into 2026, having launched two new product lines. Coming back to slide that I shared as part of the IPO process, the strategic drivers for growth, and kind of indexing a bit on 2026, we are launching new products and capabilities onto the X platform that will drive more revenue and kind of help maintain the strong commercial momentum we have in the acquisition market with the X platform.

Additionally, we have launched the X5 platform, which is capturing kind of a new market for us. It's capturing the tier two, the long tail of smaller events, the tier two events with a product that has price point and capabilities kind of targeted at that market segment.

Then we have launched our VX platform, which is our pure software-based platform. It's a very important move for us in that it gives us the opportunity to expand our product offering and become a pervasive end-to-end supplier in live production technology.

The VX platform is a software-based product, and hence, it will take time for it to become a significant contributor to our revenue growth, as the revenue here, it's subscription-based and not sort of upfront CapEx-based. The other avenue is of course the transformation into our let's say commercial playbook, the direct sales organization we've been rolling out in the US, now very successfully in UK and in Asia, so that we see a strong growth component coming out of.

Then, as most of we do have plans to make strategic acquisitions. We are actively looking at sort of prospects, but of course we're not saying anything about sort of timing, when, where, and how.

This is something that we're working on and evaluating, and this is going to be a value-driven approach for us, not a time-driven approach as such. All right.

Now I'm going to talk just about a couple of 2025 success stories that we're really proud of. The first one, it's very relevant.

Some of you may have seen the NBC Sports press release that they put out about their collaboration with Appear for the Winter Olympics. If you haven't, then go on our website and check it out.

Appear is a big provider of technology for NBC's live coverage from the Milano Cortina Winter Olympics. Our solutions are deployed at all the venues, very wide range of cameras, and really an integral part of the way NBC gets video and drives sort of the live coverage from the event for the Americas market.

We're super proud about that. Kind of across other NBC Sports and other customers, we have sort of recognized between 50 and 60 million NOK in revenue, kind of distributed across a range of customers in North America and EMEA.

The other success case that we'd like to share with you is the project that we've done in refreshing LaLiga's entire production infrastructure for live football. In 2025, we partnered with Telefónica and LaLiga in their endeavor to do a massive upgrade of their production infrastructure.

That essentially ended up with Telefónica partnering with Appear to put Appear X platform in every single LaLiga stadium to backhaul all the video feeds from the stadium to their new centralized production facility, also in all LaLiga 2 stadiums, and actually their VAR infrastructure. Appear has sort of video infrastructure now deployed across LaLiga's entire sort of stadium base, and are feeding all the stadiums' kind of content live directly into their new production hub.

All right. I'm going to hand it to Per Øyvind for the Q4 and 2025 financials.

Per Øyvind Stene

Thank you, Thomas. Let's start with the numbers for the quarter.

As Thomas mentioned, we had the third-best quarter recorded on revenues, with the revenues ending at 185 million, 32 million up from last year. Our gross profits, gross earnings, ended at 135 million at a margin of 73%, slightly below the margin last year, with positive product mix effects compensating for adverse tariff effects.

Looking at the OpEx side of we increased our headcount. We ended Q4 at 225 FTEs compared to 190 at the end of 2024.

We are investing in future growth, and also on the other operating income, we have 10 In the 47 million, we have 10.5 million in one-off expenses related to the IPO, but we also have investments there related to establishment of our offices in Singapore and Stockholm, and an ERP implementation. I guess the best place to see that we are investing in future growth is the capitalized development expenses, and we capitalized 18 million in the quarter.

EBITDAC for the quarter ended at 2 million. Adjusted for the one-off expenses related to the IPO, underlying EBITDAC was 12.6 million at a margin of 6.8% versus 5.6% in the same period for last year.

Our EBIT, operating profit, ended at 13.8 million. Then our net financial income was driven by interest on money market funds and for this quarter, positive currency effects.

Then our effective tax rate was 25% due to non-deductible IPO expenses, resulting in total profits for the period at 16 million compared to 10 million for the fourth quarter last year. Looking at the full year, as we've mentioned several times, our revenues ended at 800 million, that's a 32.3% growth year-on-year versus 2024.

Our gross profits, gross earnings, came in at 579 million, that's a gross margin of 72.3%, at par with last year. We had positive product mix and pricing balancing out the adverse effects of tariffs and currencies.

As we say, we are investing in future growth. If you combine the total employee expenses and other operating income expenses, that's also including the capitalized development expenditures, we had 455 million of cost compared to 351 million last year, which is a growth just slightly below 30%.

Those numbers include 17.8 million in one-off expenses related to the IPO. We are really committed to investing in future growth.

Thomas mentioned that we will launch more products next year, and the 65 million that we capitalized in development expenses was mainly related to products that will be launching in 2026. EBITDAC for the quarter, 124 million compared to 87 million last year.

The underlying EBITDAC, which we are focusing mainly on, ended at 142 million, and that's a margin of 17.8% compared to 15.4% last year. It shows that we are growing profitably, as we say, and also combining the underlying EBITDAC growth with revenue growth, we are well within the Rule of 40.

Our EBIT for the year ended at 171 million compared to 73 in 2024, and profit for the year was 129 million versus 70 million in '24, a substantial growth from last year. When we look at the cash flow, what stands out here is really the proceeds from the IPO of 199 91 million, and the transfer of 275 million to money market funds.

However, look at the free cash flow components, we see that the cash flow from investing activities outweighed the cash flows from operations. Here it's worth mentioning that we've been running an ISO 27001 certification project that has highlighted some areas of improvement that we decided to improve, and PP&E CapEx for the quarter totaled 12 million, 24 million for the year, which is 6 million higher than we've previously indicated.

Looking at the total picture, we started Q4 with 159 in our bank account and ended it with 60 million in our bank account. However, the available liquidity improved naturally with the proceeds from the IPO.

Looking at the 269 million growth from 20 the end of 2024, 191 million came in from proceeds from the IPO. The remaining 78 million is then related to positive cash from the business side.

Working capital was fairly stable throughout as a percentage of our revenues, was fairly stable throughout the year. Q2 stood out both in revenues, and we ended that quarter with a higher trade receivable.

We end the year with 8% of working capital over annual revenues, which is right in the middle of the 5% to 10% range that we have guided on.

Thomas Jørgensen

Thank you, Per Øyvind. Let's look at our guidance for 2026.

As we do not guide on quarters, we guide on the full year. Our 2026 guidance for revenue is NOK well, approximately NOK 1 billion.

That, if you look at the medium to long-term targets that we've communicated, they are consistent to what we communicated during the IPO. The medium to long-term revenue growth, we target in the interval between 25% to 30%.

Now, 1 billion NOK is 25% up from the 800 we did this year. That's really because we want to provide a strong, reliable guidance to the market on revenue.

In terms of the recurring part, we're looking to stay in the interval between 15% to 25%, obviously growing that share over time as we introduce more software-based solutions, gross margin at around 70%, and then an EBITDAC margin in the interval between 17% to 20%, which I think really articulates the level of investment that we're looking to do to continue growing Appear at a very significant rate. With that, I'm going to invite Per Øyvind to come up with me, and then we're going to head to our live Q&A.

Operator

Very good. For everyone on the Teams link, please raise your hand in the Teams functionality to sign up for questions.

We already have a few who have signed up. First one out is Christoffer Vangbjørsen at DNB Carnegie.

Please unmute yourself and ask your question.

Christoffer Wang Bjørnsen

Yes, good morning. Thanks for taking my question.

I was wondering just given the ongoing supply crunch challenging a lot of companies these days, could you help us understand a bit your visibility on key components in your physical products, as well as if you've seen any changes to your customer behavior? I'd expect a customer who's rolling out new infrastructure for a new league towards the fall might be prudent for them to pull forward some of their sourcing to either Q4 or Q1.

Just how you think about that whole dynamic would be helpful to get some color on.

Per Øyvind Stene

I could start with the last part of it, whether we see any change in behavior. We do not.

We see that the customers' investment, they are related to, for example, the off-seasons in more or less the same pattern as previously. When it comes to the component crunch, we're watching it closely because of course it may have an effect on our COGS.

We have had to increase our inventories to make sure that we have enough. It has an impact both on the COGS, with the memory prices going up, and that we are tying up a bit more capital.

The lead times on many of these components, they are long already, they are increasing. We are following it closely.

There have been some cancellations of orders, but we've managed to reverse. It's a situation that we just have to monitor closely.

It is competition of components, but we have good relationships with our suppliers, and we have secured components for deep into 2026.

Thomas Jørgensen

I think just to add to that, I think this is a situation where it's really good to have strong financials as we are able to kind of secure volumes of sort of components that are, let's say, in popular demand at a high enough volume at the early enough time. We've never not been able to deliver because of components, not even through COVID.

This is an area that I think we have pretty good control over historically as well.

Christoffer Wang Bjørnsen

Just a quick follow-up on that. Also appreciate the guidance for the full year.

Could you maybe help us understand how to think about the seasonality, how it's been historically, and if you see any reasons why it should deviate from kind of the historical trend, would be very much appreciated.

Per Øyvind Stene

Yes, yeah, we are introducing new products, of course, in 2026, and we believe that the revenues from those new products are most likely coming more in towards the latter part of the year. The seasonality patterns, well, whether things are coming in Q1, Q2, that's a lot of the times some are in the first and some are in the second, But the overall seasonality should be more or less the same because we are operating mainly within the acquisition market.

The seasonality, yeah, more or less the same, but then with the addition of more products. Then I can maybe just allude to our service revenues that we are calling them recurring, but they've been more up and down throughout the year, and but we're also changing that to such that we do the accounting and that we have more flatter recurring revenues, and that's of course also going to impact that we move some of the revenues to the first half of the year.

Christoffer Wang Bjørnsen

Thank you. Appreciate that.

Operator

All right. Thanks a lot.

We have another question from Øystein Elton Lodgaard from ABG Sundal Collier. Please unmute yourself.

Øystein Elton Lodgaard

Good morning. I have several questions, but maybe we can start with FX.

FX movements have been pretty large lately. We estimate that it had a 6% impact now in Q4, and 6% maybe in 2026.

Maybe can you comment on have you taken FX movements into account in the guidance? What was the impact of FX now in Q4, and what do you expect in 2026?

Per Øyvind Stene

In Q4, the effect we didn't have any major negative effects in Q4. Actually, we had slightly positive effects in the financial income that relates to that we got higher prices realized or a better currency effect realized than what we had invoiced.

We see we are exposed to FX effects because our revenues are, roughly speaking, 60% US dollars, 20% euro, 20% pounds, while our costs are, can say rule of thumb, 55% NOK, 20 USD, 15 euro, 10 GBP. We are exposed to Forex.

We have well, we have lower rates in our estimates. They are slightly above the currency rates that we saw yesterday, but yeah, looking just at yesterday's rates towards the 2025 rates, the 6% on revenues is according to our estimates.

However, there is then the slight hedge on costs, where it would be 2% to 3% lower costs. Of course, a lower currency or a stronger NOK will reduce our profits.

Øystein Elton Lodgaard

Very clear. Thank you very much.

You have taken this into account in the 1 billion NOK guidance?

Per Øyvind Stene

Yes, we have lower rates in '26 than in '25 in our guidance. If they will stay at the level we saw yesterday, which was a bottom for the year, then it will probably come in slightly lower, but not substantially because we have planned on lower or a stronger NOK for 2026.

Øystein Elton Lodgaard

Yeah. A bit over 50% of your COGS is in NOK.

Now with kind of the fact that you sell in USD and EUR and GBP, and have 50% of your COGS in NOK, should we expect gross margins to come down in '26 because of this? Or can you offset that in some way?

Per Øyvind Stene

Yes. Not completely, because as you say, we have most of the labor work being producing our goods in Norway, and then the labor cost is in NOK, we will not be fully hedged.

We are exposed that our revenues are more in US dollars than the hedging effect on the COGS. On the other hand, we've had beneficial effects with weaker currency previously, this is something we have to live with being a global exporter.

Øystein Elton Lodgaard

Of course, that's something you can't control. On component side, we of course see a very big price increase on memory.

There's now also talk about price increase on CPUs. To what extent does this impact your COGS, and are you able to completely pass those price increases onto your customers?

Per Øyvind Stene

Yes, memory, it depends a bit on the setup and the cards, but it is about, well, between 3% and 5% of the COGS. Of course, the price increases there will impact on the margin.

However, those kinds of prices increasing, that hits the whole market. Also, we've seen that with the tariffs, that we have managed with pricing to mitigate most of that.

I think that underlying price increases, we are able to mitigate because that hits all the competitors in the market as well.

Thomas Jørgensen

I think also it's worth noting that we typically have a range of alternatives for the key components, memory, for example. It's not like we're single-sourced on memory.

We always have to observe the market, but we see that the fact that we have designed in components that have several alternative vendors in the kind of same form factor, they're basically interchangeable in terms of production. It gives us the opportunity to look for kind of the most cost-optimal solutions every time we make component purchases.

Øystein Elton Lodgaard

Yeah. You don't expect any gross margin impact from that?

You should be able to pass these on to customers relatively quickly, these price increases?

Thomas Jørgensen

I think largely that's what we think.

Øystein Elton Lodgaard

Yeah. Perfect.

Lastly, of course, we've seen some very big kind of increases from the streaming players in terms of bidding for sports rights. Can you say, is that we know you have delivered to Netflix, you have delivered to some others, is that something you expect to be a positive tailwind for you, that you can kind of also deliver to these streaming giants and benefit from that?

Yes.

Thomas Jørgensen

Absolutely. The streaming giants are becoming the largest buyer of premium live sports rights.

I read somewhere that Amazon Prime is expected to spend $14 billion in 2026 on sports rights. That, and you can imagine, they don't have a lot of legacy infrastructure for live production, acquisition, processing particularly.

The part of the value chain where we specialize and typically are the preferred vendor, right? For us

Øystein Elton Lodgaard

and,

Thomas Jørgensen

we are heavily engaged with all these large players, really from the just from the nature of typically our X platform and the product offering that we have that kind of really lends itself and drives value with big scale and big complexity. That's really where these guys are coming from.

The other benefit the streamers have is that they have a completely different monetization model. I think I'm not sure if it's been on the record, but I've heard Amazon Prime say that they can pay twice as much for any specific premium live sports rights package than any other player in the market just because they have a much better monetization model for that rights, passing it down into their platforms.

Øystein Elton Lodgaard

Very interesting. Thank you very much.

That was all the questions I had.

Thomas Jørgensen

Thank you.

Per Øyvind Stene

Thank you. We have one more question signed up from Mr.

Dag Aadne. Please unmute yourself, Dag.

Thank you. Can you hear me?

Thomas Jørgensen

We can hear you.

Good. Two quick questions, if I may.

They have partially been dealt with, but the first one is on seasonality, and the second one is on FX. On seasonality, is there seasonality, and can you please then explain the drivers behind it?

In the last couple of years, it seems to be that Q2 is high, and then the rest is kind of steady, increasing. Prior to that, that was not really the case.

Thomas Jørgensen

Yeah. Then

on FX, are you managing FX at all, or, alternatively, is the lead times so limited, you kind of live with it on a more or less spot level, and mostly adjusting prices?

Thomas Jørgensen

I'll answer the first. Per Øyvind will answer the second.

We've obviously seen a big spike in seasonality in Q2 both in 2024 and 2025. We did a big pivot some years ago from the consumption part of the market, infrastructure for linear TV, right, to acquisition, which is part of why we've been able to kind of tap into this massive growth in premium live sports rights.

Now, if you look at the triggers for buying, part of it is the ongoing seasonality of the leagues. We see that, sort of particularly in the US, it differs a bit, right, but a lot of the leagues kind of focus on, let's say, activity in Q4 and Q1, and then sort of a break, let's say in Q2 and Q3.

That's something we see driving part of the seasonality. Triggers from the leagues' off-season, where they do invest in improving their product, right, and investing in operational efficiency, that is a driver kind of to look out for.

For 2025, a big driver was investments into the two very, very large events this year, which is the Milano Cortina Olympics and the FIFA World Cup in the US later this year. Not all, but a lot of the investments for those big events kind of came in in Q2.

Then the other thing I wanted to say was that there was a shift last year, a shift of revenue from Q1 into Q2 due to kind of the tariff situation hitting that or the uncertainty around the tariff situation hitting this sort of late Q1 into early Q2, which made some of the customers kind of pause a bit before they hit the purchase order button. I think that cumulative effect of that, of course, made Q2 last year very significant.

Per Øyvind Stene

Then to Forex, we currently don't have any future contracts hedging. We did it to some extent last year.

However, the currency rates kind of stabilized over the second half, but it's something that we are assessing. It wouldn't be taking speculative positions in that case.

Then it would be more to just secure the rates that we have on our orders. We are managing sales on a gross margin kind of different thresholds, then it would be more related to securing larger contracts and the currency rate that we have when we sign orders.

Currently, we don't have any hedges or future currency contracts.

Thomas Jørgensen

All right. Thank you.

I think, hopefully, that was helpful to...

Just a quick follow-up on seasonality, I'm sorry. Just to...

Thomas Jørgensen

We don't really have time, I'm going to have to cut you short, I'm sorry.

We

Thomas Jørgensen

have a new interview at Finansavisen TV in a few minutes. Go there and watch the follow-up if you're interested in more.

Thank you so much for calling in, and until next time. Thank you.