Hexpol AB Class B

Hexpol AB Class B

95.40
SEK
-2.25
(-2.30%)
5.52EPS
13.10P/E
24.89BMarket Cap
Oct 23Next Earn

Q2 FY2026 · Earnings Call TranscriptJuly 20, 2026

Operator

Welcome to the Hexpol Q2 presentation. During the questions and answers session, participants are able to ask questions by dialing pound key 5 on their telephone keypad.

Now I will hand the conference over to the Deputy CEO and CFO Peter Rosén. Please go ahead.

Peter Rosén

Thank you, everyone, and thank you for listening in to our Q2 presentation. For today, I'll take you through the overall business performance in the quarter, then go into each business area in a little bit more detail.

I'll take you through the financials, and then we summarize and wrap up with a Q&A session. Let's start on on group level.

As you've seen, it's a quarter where we deliver strong organic sales growth. When we look at the overall picture of the markets where we operate, there is not much change since the beginning of the year.

Generally speaking, we still see fairly high levels of uncertainty and a wait-and-see mentality with a lot of customers and in the markets. From a geographical point of view, it's also similar to the beginning of the year with higher uncertainty in North America compared to Europe that is somewhat more stable compared to last year.

The uncertainty that we felt in the beginning of the year has to a certain extent intensified during the second quarter following on the Middle East situation, not not least with the impact on volatile raw material prices, and I will come back to this in a little bit more detail later on. That being said, when we look at our own performance during the quarter, we see improvements in both of our largest business area, rubber compounding and thermoplastic compounding, while engineered products delivers a stable results.

Our focus on maintaining and increasing our market share has been successful here in the quarter, and we see volume growth to our largest end customers customer segments, such as wire and cable, general industry, and building and and construction. Volume to the automotive end customer segment is saw some growth on group level.

All in all, we deliver 8% organic growth, mainly driven by higher volumes. It's especially positive to see double-digit organic growth of 12% with thermoplastic compounding, which is a clear growth area for us.

During the quarter, we've also had to deal with increasing raw material prices, which we compensated for through price increases in both Europe and North America. When we look at the overall Q2 performance, despite some continuing negative FX effects, we deliver 5.3 billion SEK in sales, which is up 6% compared to the same period last year, and improve adjusted EBIT at 772 million SEK, and consequently also higher adjusted EPS in the quarter.

If we then go into the business areas, and we start with rubber compounding, on the markets where we operate, total volumes are still at historically low levels, affected by the general lower customer demand that we see. We also see the captive volumes being at high levels, although we believe these volumes has have peaked.

When we look at our own performance in this area, we see that the work regarding protecting and also improving market share has been successful. We've also been able to retain some captive volumes, not least in North America.

This has resulted in higher volumes for our larger end customer segments, such as general industry, wire and cable, building and construction. Automotive volumes are stable in the quarter for rubber compounding.

The situation in the Middle East has created imbalances in the supply chain and also volatile raw material prices. This has certainly been a challenge during the last few months, but the Hexpol organization has handled these challenges very well and managed both supply of raw materials and implemented price increases when needed.

All in all, we achieved 7% organic growth in the quarter, and this is mainly driven by higher volumes. If we go into and look at thermoplastic compounding, delivered a very strong quarter.

During the quarter, we see positive ramp-up effects of from previously won projects as well as volumes from new projects being started. Some of these projects are driven by end customers requiring higher levels of recycled content in products that we can deliver, which is positive for us.

As with rubber compounding, thermoplastic compounding has been impacted by the Middle East situation when it comes to availability of raw materials and fluctuating raw material prices. Consequently, price increases have been implement- implemented also for thermoplastic compounding to compensate for the higher raw material prices.

As I mentioned before, we deliver high organic growth of 12% in the quarter, and this is also most driven by mostly driven by higher volumes. If we then look at engineered products, we saw somewhat lower sales in the quarter, and this is primarily related to a couple of specific customers in Sweden.

Last year we saw record-level sales, and demand has been somewhat lower here in the first half of the year, but we do not see any major market changes in the underlying market. We still deliver high profitability in the quarter.

I will come back to this in more detail later on. If we then go over and look at the financial overview for the quarter, we delivered the sales of 5.3 billion with an adjusted EBIT of just above 770 million SEK with a margin of 14.6%.

The The reason why we use adjusted EBIT stems from that we report the cost associated with the termination of the previous CEO as non-recurring items. The cash flow in the quarter is somewhat below EBIT, but still solid at about 680 million SEK.

We do see some negative impact from the Middle East situation on inventory levels, and I will come back to this in a little bit more detail later on. Net debt-to-EBITDA ratio at the end of the quarter at 1.17 and below what we had last year in in the second quarter.

If we then look at how this compares to Q2 last year, sales are up 6%, partly offset by negative FX effects, and in fixed currency rates, sales are up 9%. Despite about 20 million SEK in negative FX effects, EBIT increased to 772 million SEK.

EBIT margin for the quarter at 14.6%, which is down 50 basis points compared to last year, and this is affected by the relative increase in opex driven by increased IT investments, but also cost for more people resources needed to support growth going forward. Looking at sales in a little bit more detail for the group, as mentioned, fixed currency sales are up 9%, out of which 8% is organic growth, while the while acquisitions, which is Cabpol, add another 1% in the quarter.

The organic sales increase is primarily driven by higher volumes. From a geographical perspective, North America showed 3% growth, but in fixed currency, the growth was 7%, while Europe delivered 10% growth or 11% in fixed currency.

Asia was in line with last year levels. If we take a look at the development of EBIT, despite the somewhat the 21 million SEK in negative FX effect, adjusted EBIT increased to 772 million SEK.

At fixed rates, the increase was 5% in EBIT. If we then look at the drivers impacting EBIT compared to last year, the main driver is obviously the higher sales, while the gross margin was on the same level as last year.

As I mentioned, we see an increase in opex, and this is primarily driven by higher IT-related cost and investments in people resources to drive growth. If we then go into a little bit more detail for the three business areas, starting with rubber compounding, it delivered sales of 3.6 billion SEK in the quarter, up 5% compared to last year, or at fixed currency rates, the growth was 8%, of which organic growth was 7%.

The high organic growth is driven by the higher volumes, and acquired Cabpol adds 1% in sales in in the quarter. The higher volumes are seen both in North America and in Europe.

From an end customer perspective, we see growth with wire and cable, building and construction, and general industry, and automotive sales were stable in the quarter. EBIT is negatively impacted by negative FX effects of 20 million or 3%, but came in at 546 million SEK with a margin of 14- 15.2% in the quarter.

We then move over to thermoplastic, delivered sales of 1.3 billion SEK in the quarter, up 9% compared to last year, or at fixed rates, the growth was 12%, all of which is organic growth. Main part of this volume is driven by it's volume driven, but there are also some positive price/mix effects in here.

As with rubber compounding, the organic sales development was positively affected by volume higher volumes to most end customer segments, not least building and construction and general industry, but also automotive and medical saw growth. The drivers of the growth are increased volumes on existing business, but also ramp-up of projects that were agreed with customers before this quarter and now start to deliver volumes here in the quarter.

Following on the higher sales, we saw strong improvement in EBIT that increased 40% to 155 million. At the same time, we saw strong improvement in the EBIT margin with increase 280 basis points to 11.9% in the quarter.

Then if we take a look at engineered products, we saw sales of 386 million SEK here in the quarter, which is below last year 402 million, and the decrease is primarily driven somewhat by somewhat lower demand from a couple of customers in Sweden. As I mentioned before, this should be seen in light of record sales in the same period last year.

A lower EBIT follow on the lower sales, but still high margins in line with last year, above 18%. If we then leave the P&L and look at working capital, it is slightly higher than same period last year.

This is driven by higher inventory, and this is what I referred to in the beginning. This is affected by the situation in the Middle East.

In some cases, we've increased our inventory levels to ensure that we have access to the material that we need to produce. Also, the higher raw material prices impact negatively.

Depending on how this situation evolves going forward when it comes to raw material prices, we view this as temporary as we turn our inventory quite quickly during a year. There is no change in any underlying payment terms to customers and/or suppliers.

If we then look at the cash flow, we delivered a solid cash flow below 700 million SEK, where depreciation and investments are balanced, while the working capital is, as I mentioned, affected negatively by the inventory in the quarter. Then to finalize the financial view, we close the quarter with a net debt of 3.8 billion SEK and a net debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 1.17, below last year.

All in all, we continue here at the end of second quarter to stand with a very strong financial position. Then if I can summarize the second quarter, it's a very strong quarter with high organic growth of 8%.

The growth we see with both of our largest business areas. In the quarter, we've worked intensely to protect and grow our market shares, and we've also been able to win some captive volumes that has contributed to this growth.

At the same time, it is a quarter impacted by the Middle East, which has resulted in supply challenges and higher raw materials. I think we've handled these challenges very well.

We've been able to secure raw materials needed for us, and we've implemented price increases when necessary. All in all, when we summarize the second quarter, we deliver high sales and higher results, which we are quite proud of.

With that, I thank you for listening, and I hand over to Q&A.

Operator

If you wish to ask a question, please dial pound key 5 on your telephone keypad to enter the queue. If you wish to withdraw your question, please dial pound key 6 on your telephone keypad.

The next question comes from Henric Alveskog from ABG Sundal Collier. Please go ahead.

Henric Hintze

Hi, Peter, this is Henric. First, I was just wondering a bit about the sequential price/mix improvement you talked about.

Is that sort of, would you say, a durable customer/product mix change, or is there anything about the sort of raw material price swings driving this?

Peter Rosén

Hi, Henric. When we talk about the sequential price/mix improvement, it's primarily price increases that have been implemented.

There is some positive mix effect, but it's primarily price. Okay.

Henric Hintze

Yes. Specifically in thermoplastics where the margin was up quite a bit.

How come that differed from rubber? Three,

Peter Rosén

well, two things that are similar, and a third one which is a little bit more thermoplastic-specific. We've implemented price increases in thermoplastics as well to compensate for the raw material price increases.

We have a little bit positive mix effects, but also since we've seen higher volumes, they also cover more of the indirect fixed cost in production. You also get some leverage when volumes go up.

Henric Hintze

Okay. On that, maybe we saw opex come up quite a bit here, and you mentioned some things driving that, but would you say this is sort of the new base level, or is it coming up more from here?

Peter Rosén

I don't see that we will increase much from this level, but we do have the increase which is, as I mentioned, is primarily IT and staffing, but the estimate is not that we will increase from here.

Henric Hintze

Okay. Just finally, how come automotive volumes are flat in rubber, but up in thermoplastics?

Peter Rosén

No specific reason more than when we see thermoplastic, they have initiated more new products related to product launches, and those automotive car models being launched where we've had higher volumes in the thermoplastic, and that has had a bigger impact on thermoplastic compounding than rubber compounding.

Henric Hintze

Okay. Very good.

Thank you.

Operator

The next question comes from Jakob Marken from SEB. Please go ahead.

Jakob Marken

Yes, hello, Peter, and thank you for taking my question. Some of them already answered, but just a follow-up on the opex part.

Can you provide some more detail, if there are any specific segments, geographies, business areas that you are investing in or seeing something special that we that the opex growth is related to?

Peter Rosén

Yes and no. When we look at investment in people resources to facilitate growth, we have that across the business, I would say.

Then some of those resources may differ from market or company geography depending on their needs, but it's primarily sales people and R&D resources. When it comes to IT, we see a general uptick where we need to do, and then over time, that will be changed geographically from a geographic point of view.

Currently, it's more in the North America, and then we will see that coming down and see more investments in other areas.

Jakob Marken

Thank you. That's helpful.

Then just a question on the M&A side. It seems like the rhetoric in the report is rather similar to Q1.

Have you seen any shift in the sort of M&A market, or are price is willing to sell, or anything on the M&A market that you can update us on?

Peter Rosén

I would say that the M&A market is quite similar to what we saw in the first quarter, and then we have discussions ongoing that we are intensifying.

Jakob Marken

Yeah. Perfect.

That was all for me. I'll get back in line.

Operator

The next question comes from Agnieszka Vilela from Nordea. Please go ahead.

Agnieszka Vilela

Hi, Peter, and thank you for taking my questions. Maybe starting with pricing, could you help us and tell us how much did you increase prices year-on-year, or what the impact was year-on-year in Q2?

Given the volatility in the material prices, what should we expect in the coming quarters?

Peter Rosén

Thank you, Agnieszka. If I take your second question first, simple answer is we are uncertain.

During the second quarter, we saw raw material prices coming up. The forecast is that raw material prices should come down some going forward, but I have to admit it changes almost daily on the exact development of the raw material prices depending on what happens in the Middle East.

The general forecast, and I can't say when it happens, is that raw material prices should come down. It yeah, difficult to answer whether it happens tomorrow or a month from now, it depends on how it develops in the Middle East.

Then if I take your first question regarding how much price increases have been implemented, I would say they are in the mid low mid single-digit growth.

Agnieszka Vilela

Yeah. Perfect.

Thank you. Just maybe a follow-up on the kind of outlook for your pricing into Q3, isn't there a lag that means that you already kind of know what you are implementing for Q3?

If so, is this kind of pricing element improving?

Peter Rosén

When we go to customers with price changes, that is when we know a little bit more how raw material prices will develop. We cannot and we will not go with daily fluctuations.

We will need to see a little bit more, have a little bit more time to see how raw material prices develop, and then we will implement changes. There is always a certain lag, if you call it that.

We will need to see how raw materials prices develop before we can go with price changes.

Agnieszka Vilela

Understood. Then maybe on volumes for the group in general, that was the second quarter with volumes growth for you sequentially and or consecutive.

What momentum do you see so far in Q3? Will this growth even accelerate?

Then maybe a follow-up to that, you've seen some captive volumes now returning to your business. Can you tell us what upside do you see to your sales if these captive volumes return to more normalized level?

Peter Rosén

Yeah. We don't give forecasts or guidance on future performance, I will shy away from commenting on Q3.

When it comes to captive volumes, it's very much a question of if we can get customers to produce for them and deliver both service and quality in time at a price, then we should be able to continue or grow captive volumes. It's still a bit early days, we'll wait and see, and come back to it in Q3 when we know how we perform.

Agnieszka Vilela

Can you tell us how much of a kind of headwind it was for you in the, say, past 2 to 3 years? On your growth.

Peter Rosén

Sorry, I didn't hear the

Agnieszka Vilela

If you could tell us how much kind of headwind the more insourcing by customers was for your growth in the past 2 to 3 years?

Peter Rosén

Depends on when you have the starting point, but it's been significant, let's put it that way.

Agnieszka Vilela

Yeah. Then the last for me on thermoplastics, I noticed that you had very strong growth in Europe in at least reported numbers, plus 20% year-on-year.

Anything out of ordinary driving it, or is just a fact that they are performing very well right now?

Peter Rosén

Performing very well, and it's related to when customer-specific projects are started and start to generate volume as well.

Agnieszka Vilela

Thank you.

Operator

The next question comes from Carl Deijenberg from Carnegie. Please go ahead.

Carl Deijenberg

Hi, Peter. Could I ask first, I was maybe a little bit surprised on the statement on slide 3.

I appreciate the comments on the sequential price improvement, but why are not prices higher year-on-year? I think you're stating here that they're on a similar level.

What are the dynamics behind that? I thought it was definitely going to be higher year-on-year as well.

Peter Rosén

Now, if we go back one year, at the end of first quarter last year, we started to see raw material prices, and subsequently, sales prices going down as well. In second quarter of last year, that's where we had a fairly big impact on lower sales prices.

Those sales prices we had for the rest of last year as well. When we see where we stand today, and we see the price increases have been implemented, we've basically come back to where we were a year ago.

There is some mix effect in it as well, but when we look at prices, that's what we've seen.

Carl Deijenberg

Okay. Could I ask also, I guess, the volume development that you're talking about is quite surprisingly positive here.

When I read the wording, the markets that you are sourcing that is performing well, wire and cables and so forth, I think you've had a similar communication the last couple of quarters, is there anything, specific driving this change here in Q2? Do you see any competition, suffering more from the situation in the Middle East, or is it just a general uptick in those overall end markets?

Peter Rosén

I think it's a combination of a couple of things. When we look at general industry and wire and cable, in the segments where we have products, we've seen increased demand.

It's our view that we've also been able to take market share in some of these segments with existing customers, also been able to add a little bit to that, we've seen increase in those segments.

Carl Deijenberg

Okay. Those market share gains, is that due to your, supply chain and purchasing organization and so forth being more, let's say, proactive, or what we want to call it relative competition?

Is that the main explanation, as you see it?

Peter Rosén

I would say depending a little bit where we look, but I think even more customer focus has given some of this volume, and we also know that in some cases, we've had we have some of this volume is because also some competitors have difficulty in managing raw materials and deliveries and supplies.

Carl Deijenberg

In the scenario where, let's say prices would come down again or let's say normalized, would you believe that these market share gains are structural, or would it be evened out again then, in your view?

Peter Rosén

I don't see direct correlation with the prices and market shares, but if raw material prices go down, then we will need to adjust pricing to customers. That would change with raw material prices.

The volumes that we have and the market share is something that, of course, we will work very focused on maintaining or, if possible, improve.

Carl Deijenberg

Very well. Then maybe just finally also, I know that you're not guiding on, price contribution, but if you take the sort of run rate right now, first couple of weeks here in Q3, what would the price contribution would be on a year-on-year basis, without giving any forecasts what the remainder of Q4 is going to be, but what kind of, year-on-year run rate are we talking about there?

Peter Rosén

That's almost impossible for me to answer, especially since we see that currently the forecast on raw material prices is down. Any number I will come with will probably change within a week or 2 weeks, I will refrain from I will pass on that one.

Carl Deijenberg

Okay. Thank you, Peter.

Peter Rosén

Thanks.

Operator

The next question comes from Mats Liss from Kepler Cheuvreux. Please go ahead.

Mats Liss

Hi, thank you. Coming back to organic sales then, I guess you mentioned that you have increased inventories somewhat to secure deliveries and so on.

Do you see a similar pattern among customers then, and maybe also if they try to avoid price increases, well, have you seen any impact of that in your organic sales improvement?

Peter Rosén

To a certain extent. I think in the beginning of the quarter, if we go back to April and partly May, we did see some customers where we think they order a little bit more than they normally did do.

Our products don't lend themselves to pre-buying that much, since, for example, rubber probably has a shelf life of 3, 4 weeks, then it needs to be turned into components. Even though we did see a little bit of it in the beginning of the quarter, when we look at the quarter as a total, we don't think that there is much effect of pre-buying.

Mats Liss

Great. Secondly, on thermoplastic there, well, you mentioned this market share gains you have succeeded in, and on the back of customer projects.

Could you say something about the second half there, short-term, if you see similar trends benefiting you?

Peter Rosén

Sorry, in the second half of

Mats Liss

This year, or maybe longer term also, but if you have a good position in customer-related projects, it boosted you in the first half there, or in the second quarter.

Peter Rosén

In the second, our view is that we have a good position, but regarding volumes that will materialize the second half of the year, I will pass on that, because then I will get close to guidance, and we don't do that. Currently, we're delivering on the projects that we have.

We feel comfortable with the share that we have. Then we will just need to continue to work on this focus going forward.

Mats Liss

Finally, just on rubber compounding there, you mentioned that increased overhead cost there have affected your margin negatively. Could you shed some more color on that one?

Peter Rosén

Yeah. As I mentioned, we've invested in more people resources, not least on the sales side, also for the R&D side, where we've made some changes and centralized some R&D, for example, here in Europe.

Then we invest more in IT, both to replace existing systems, but also invest in more efficient systems going forward. It's a combination of those things that add.

Mats Liss

Great. Finally, you mentioned you have, well, pretty good financial position now and M&A opportunities.

Could you say something about those? I know you are in the changeover process here of management also or CEO.

Do that affect your your sort of how trigger-happy you are to make acquisitions?

Peter Rosén

If I take your last question first, no, it would not impact. Not more than we are very focused on actually delivering M&A, there will be no pause or let-up in us doing M&A because of this.

We continue to work as focused on this, and even more so than we've done before. We're really keen on doing this.

Mats Liss

Thanks. Thanks a lot.

Operator

The next question comes from Agnieszka Vilela from Nordea. Please go ahead.

Agnieszka Vilela

I have a follow-up on thermoplastics and profitability for that division with expansion of almost 3 percentage points year-on-year in the quarter. I note though that comparisons, I think, were a bit easier given that Q2 last year was down on margins.

Peter Rosén

Still,

Agnieszka Vilela

could you tell us what should we expect a similar kind of improvement in profitability in the coming quarters if volumes hold up or improve, if you see this positive mix effect still? What to expect in the coming quarters?

Oh,

Peter Rosén

difficult to say. I I think the the current profitability level where we are now is makes sense.

That's where we can be in the short term. Then, of course, we have said that the strategic direction of thermopla- growth in thermoplastic is to move up in the what we call the product pyramid.

That move where we move into more profitable segments is something that we will need M&A to to drive, to be a large driver of. We need to do more M&A in thermoplastic in order to move it up further in the product pyramid.

Agnieszka Vilela

Perfect. Thank you.

Operator

There are no more questions at this time. I hand the conference back to the speakers for any closing comments.

Peter Rosén

Thank you, everyone, for listening in for our Q2 report. Thank you, and I wish you a very nice week.

Take care.