Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us for Intermap Technologies' conference call to discuss its financial results for the third quarter of 2025 for the three months ending September 30th, 2025. I'm Sean Peasgood from Sophic Capital, we handle Intermap's investor relations.

On today's call, we have Intermap CEO Patrick Blott, CFO Jennifer Bakken, and COO Jack Schneider. During the call, all participants are in a listen-only mode.

Following the presentation, we'll conduct a question-and-answer session. We encourage you to submit your questions through the Q&A tab at any time, and management will answer them following their prepared remarks.

Before management discusses the results, I'd like to remind everyone that certain statements in this call may be forward-looking in nature. These include statements involving known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements.

For caveats about forward-looking statements and risk factors, please see our MD&A for the third quarter ended September 30th, 2025, which will be filed on our company profile at SEDAR+ on November 13th. I'll now pass the call over to Intermap CEO Patrick Blott.

Patrick, go ahead.

Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Intermap's financial results conference call for the third quarter of 2025. I'm Patrick Blott, chairman and CEO of Intermap.

Today, as we review the third quarter results, I'll provide highlights along with a business update and outlook. Then I'll turn the call over to Jennifer Bakken, our CFO, to walk through our recent financial performance, and we'll leave some time at the end for Q&A.

A little over a year ago, we were ramping up to execute our new program in Indonesia. Since that time, we permitted, both in Indonesia and in the United States--

Looks like we just lost Patrick. Give us 1 second, and we'll get him back on the line here.

Sorry about the inconvenience. Hey, Patrick,

we lost you. I'm back.

Sorry about that. Okay.

All right. A little over a year ago, we were ramping up to execute our new program in Indonesia.

Since that time, we've permitted in both Indonesia and the United States, we've hired locally in large numbers, upgraded processing systems and capacity with advanced technology and GPUs, deployed a massive team into the field. We've delivered exquisite data to the customer, better than specifications, collected attributes and 3D vectors, and built a 1:5,000 scale basemap in unbelievably record time, turnaround that was unimaginable 5 years ago before our process automation.

We accomplished this using AI-driven and advanced GPU-driven models and automation technologies built by our own team, working in partnership with customers all over the world. Our lenders have stepped up, offering incredible financial support for our contracting activity, allowing Intermap to comply with financial requirements, which reflects a positive credit assessment of the quality of our customer base that delivers our revenue.

In addition, our equity and shelf registration, Intermap was able to demonstrate over $100 million of credit support to back its work on large government contracting programs all over the world. That's a huge step forward.

We've raised over $35 million of equity capital through a LIFE offering and a base shelf prospectus. We've removed the going concern qualification from our financial statements.

In Indonesia, the $200 million Integrated Land Administration and Spatial Planning project is moving forward as expected. During the quarter, we submitted bids covering all four lots of the program.

The tender review committee is currently evaluating those submissions. The program remains backed by the World Bank, denominated in U.S.

dollars, which enhances certainty and margin predictability. We're the incumbent, and our technology, local operations, and performance history continue to set the standard for national mapping.

We've evolved our technology, systems, and platform, working with the U.S. Air Force, NGA, DARPA, and others.

Nothing that we're doing right now for customers is conceptual. It's proven.

We're driving growth by hitting the repeat button, not just the create button. When we do create things, it's for specific customer value gaps where they lead the way with identified demand signals.

It's not speculative investment. It's ROI-driven high-technology investment.

That's why organizations like DARPA and NGA Research want to work with Intermap to better leverage the returns on their own research dollars. We've announced today two contracts on IDIQ vehicles totaling more than $500 million combined ceiling to work with NOAA to integrate where water shoreline intersects with terrain.

The $250 million Coastal Geospatial Services Contract 5 and the $250 million NGS Shoreline Mapping Support IDIQ are long-cycle programs that provide recurring opportunities to deliver data, analytics across a range of coastal and climate applications. The $21 million equity financing completed in September increased shareholders' equity to more than $27 million and provided the liquidity we need to scale and compete.

It also expands our strategic flexibility at a critical moment, with major tenders now underway throughout Southeast Asia, the United States, and Europe. Revenue for the quarter was $1.7 million compared to $5 million last year, reflecting the timing of government programs, most notably in Indonesia and the slowdown in U.S.

government activity caused by the shutdown. More than 90% of revenue came from the United States and Europe.

Commercial performance has been particularly strong. Commercial revenue grew 37% year-over-year.

Commercial is currently tracking around $7 million a year. Working capital was $23.3 million at the end of the quarter, allowing the company to remove our going concern qualification.

The company is in the process of uplisting its audit to comply with U.S. Securities registrations under PCAOB.

Adjusted EBITDA was negative $1 million for the quarter compared to positive $1.6 for 2024. Net loss was $1.5 million compared to net income of $1.1 million.

Operating cash flow year-to-date was $2 million compared to negative $1 million for the same period last year. Cash flows was reinvested to improve our working capital, and net of that investment, operating cash flow during the quarter improved to negative $1.7 million compared to negative $2.3 million last year.

We're expecting continued growth for our insurance segment around the world, driven by continued adoption of our elevation-as-a-service and analytics subscriptions, along with growing demand for our insurance risk assistant subsystem, or IRAS. The product's agentic AI foundation is proving valuable for insurance carriers to price and manage risk and estimate loss.

To share some high-level metrics on insurance specifically, we currently have several hundred daily users making more than 5 million 3D data calls in a typical month, which we track, to analyze properties all over North America, Europe, and soon Asia. These numbers surge during and immediately after climate events.

The data usage contributes to our understanding and modeling of climate perils. We don't compete with these clients for their premium dollars.

We empower them to do more profitable underwriting, to use our proprietary global flood models, for example, within their own underwriting process. With some capacity providers, we are negotiating incentive compensation arrangements to allow Intermap to capture more of the underwriting value it delivers and participate in premium growth.

These existing customers are earning billions of dollars in profitable underwriting and reinsurance premium globally. On the origination side, in the U.S.

alone, the private flood market now exceeds $1 billion in premium, with $4.5 billion National Flood Insurance Program retrenching further every year, which extends the protection gap. That also, though, increases the market opportunity for private flood.

Today, our business is supporting more than 60 underwriting programs worldwide, with new capacity providers joining us every quarter. Because our data, models, and analytics are proven, Intermap's programs are drawing capacity from the largest insurance and reinsurance companies in the world.

They trust Intermap software to support their in-house underwriting, portfolio management, reinsurance with better analytics, automation, speed, accuracy, tools, and data products. They're growing with us into new global markets because they trust Intermap as an enabler of accurate underwriting, which in turn enables scalable distribution.

A significant amount of growth was contributed by Europe. Our first-to-market AI agent there draws on Intermap's proprietary data, allows established multi-peril underwriters and reinsurers to significantly expand, automate, and rapidly scale their processes, driving very high conversion rates.

A typical small capacity provider will consider 250,000 to 500,000 risks a year, representing $200 million of premium. The risk assistant allows this customer to rapidly scale their capacity, providing automated, scalable, AI-driven capabilities to confidently execute real-time property-level risk assessment, premium pricing, claims assessment, and reinsurance.

Subscribers benefit from an independent, real-time automated and objective risk assessment that penetrates 3D locations and 3D vectors deeper than algorithms that rely solely on geolocated addresses. This leverages our enormous archive of historic 3D location and data to mitigate basis risk and improve underwriting outcomes.

Intermap is the only commercial company with the underwriting-quality, high-precision 3D foundation and vector data available across the entire globe to support global insurance programs at this level of acuity. The risk assistant also incorporates proven proprietary, easy to calibrate, and patented global flood models that overlay additional diverse views of risk.

The company continues to ramp its operations to qualify for and execute larger contracts. We continue to invest in technology and in our people.

Our processing and AI capabilities are expanding, and our aircraft and sensor kits are performing exceptionally. We're building for scale to execute on multiple larger contracts to sustain recurring revenue.

Today, compared to a year ago, we're better, we're faster, we're more precise, we're definitely more global, we're more integrated within all of our domains: earth, air, sea, and space. Compared to a year ago, we have new technology, better platforms, additional talent, more scale, better specs that we're hitting, better data, more liquidity, credit support, growth capital, and very, very importantly, incredible past performance after working for a year in Indonesia.

Overall, this quarter demonstrated the discipline of our operating model and the strength of our strategy and the ability of the company to generate cash throughout the contracting cycle. We're competing for additional work in Indonesia, I'm not going to talk further about that specifically, other than to say with specific past performance and well-capitalized balance sheet and having delivered exceptional data products to them already, we're in a much stronger position than we were when we won this program last year.

In government contracting, uncertain timing effects can impact revenues where Intermap's competing for large dollars relative to its current size. Where we have greater control over timing, we've converted years of investment into financial stability, we deepened our commercial traction, and we established a significantly stronger platform for growth based upon the work we've done to date.

The focused work happening right now for the remaining weeks of the year, we're maintaining our guidance of $30 to $35 million in revenue and 28% adjusted EBITDA margin. There's ample identified contracting opportunities to support these dollars in short time frames once our customers decide to work with Intermap.

Risks include assumptions regarding future contracts awards, revenue recognition timing, and uncertainty of subscription renewals. With that, I will turn the call over to our CFO, Jennifer Bakken, to review the financial results in more detail.

Thank you, Patrick. As a reminder, we report our financial results in U.S.

dollars. For more detailed financial information, please refer to the financial statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis that we will file on SEDAR+ and EDGAR today.

For the third quarter ended September 30, 2025, revenue was $1.7 million compared to $5 million in the third quarter of 2024. The difference primarily reflects the timing of program activity in Indonesia and U.S.

government programs. Year-to-date revenue was $9 million compared to $10.2 million for the same period in '24.

By segment, acquisition services contributed $0.1 million, value-added data $0.4 million, and software and solutions $1.2 million for the quarter. Software and solutions increased 20% year-over-year, underscoring continued growth in our SaaS and analytics offerings.

Operating cash flow for the year-to-date period was $2 million when you exclude the investment to repay accounts payable, compared to $1.4 million use of cash when you exclude the growth of accounts payable last year. Net of accounts payable changes, operating cash flow for the quarter improved to negative $1.7 million from negative $2.3 million in 2024.

Working capital at September 30 was $23 million, and shareholders' equity rose to $27.2 million, reflecting the $21 million bought deal financing completed in the quarter. This strong working capital position allowed us to remove the going concern qualification from our financial statements, a major milestone that demonstrates our financial stability and the confidence of our capital partners.

Adjusted EBITDA was negative $1 million for the quarter compared with positive $1.6 million last year. The change reflects the expected timing of project execution, partially offset by stronger commercial performance.

Net loss for the quarter was $1.5 million compared with net income of $1.1 million last year. Our balance sheet has been transformed.

We now have the liquidity and equity base to pursue and execute larger government programs while maintaining investment in our high-margin recurring software business. We ended the quarter with no significant debt maturities and modest ongoing obligations related to our aircraft and equipment financing.

From a risk perspective, our primary exposure continues to be the timing of government contract awards, foreign currency volatility. With World Bank funding for the Indonesia mapping program now denominated in U.S.

dollars, we expect that exposure to be significantly reduced going forward. In summary, Intermap finished the quarter with a strong capital foundation, improving cash generation, and clear visibility into our next phase of growth.

Patrick, back to you.

Thank you, Jennifer. Our focus for the remainder of 2025 and into 2026 is execution.

We're converting tenders into contracts, expanding our commercial SaaS footprint, and leveraging proprietary AI and GEOINT capabilities to deliver value at global scale. We appreciate the continued support of our shareholders, partners, and employees as we build a stronger and more resilient Intermap.

Thanks again for tuning in today. I'm now going to pass the call to you, Sean, to moderate the Q&A.

Oh,

great. Thanks, Patrick and Jennifer.

As a reminder, you can submit a question by clicking the Q&A tab at the bottom of the webinar. We'd like to thank participants for their questions.

First questions are around Indonesia. On the August call, you noted that the technical specifications for the new work were unchanged from your current Phase 1 work.

The RFB was revised somewhat. Can you comment on how the final technical requirements compare with Phase 1?

The final specifications are the same. They're building a country map.

Very important that that is well understood. They're building a country map.

That map has very prescriptive specs around what the scale is and what the components of building it are, and those have not changed. Those went through multi-year technical process to define those specs.

Around technical capabilities, are you familiar with the technical capabilities of the other companies bidding on the Indonesia contracts and contrast that with what you offer?

I'm not going to do that. I'm not sure what the upside to us or anyone for doing that right now in the middle of these processes.

Okay. Aside from Indonesia, you've previously expressed optimism on other government contract wins in Southeast Asia and potentially South America and other markets.

Can you comment on an update from that after the last quarter?

Yeah. We have active pursuit happening on every continent right now.

We have dedicated teams on every continent, including Southeast Asia, Latin America, South America, even Africa, Europe, and increasingly in the United States and Canada as well. There's a lot of activity happening.

The shutdown, it did affect certain funding and certain actual task orders, but it did not affect because essentially the civilians weren't getting paid, right? The uniformed personnel were, and they kept working, and we kept meeting, and we kept refining requirements.

There's a lot of activity there. It did not miss a step because the world didn't stop.

There's lots of stuff going on in addition to Indonesia.

You made a comment about the NOAA contracts, but can you provide more insight into those two contract opportunities? I don't know if there's any more you can add.

I think one of the key things that is important is the integration of the different domains because solutions today do require multidomain expertise. Both our sensor kit, our processing kit, our GEOINT products are multidomain designed, and they do bring value into multidomain, particularly and especially during the integration.

We've talked about IRIS before and how our architecture's built. The two defining features: one, global scale; and two, it's source-agnostic.

That ability to integrate, particularly around the seams of terrain and maritime, air and space, that's really an important capability. That is the requirement on that contract.

Another question here about the shutdown, just asking if you can quantify or talk to the impact of how the shutdown has impacted 2025 and maybe if you're seeing anything come back or how you foresee that changing in the future.

It's really resolving itself real-time right now. Like I said, it did not interrupt our work.

I do believe it slowed down cuz a lot of the administrative stuff is civilian, and it did slow down contracting. I don't think it's fundamentally changed much for the year.

Okay. Sticking with defense, can you talk about what you're seeing in terms of order potential on Luno A and B and JANUS?

No, I don't have anything to add since last quarter. The requirements, those are GEOINT requirements.

They're very specific, and they're very different. They're not generic.

Our other contract vehicle, which is JANUS, is more generic in terms of the requirement flow, more geography-based, but these requirements are GEOINT, and they're very, very different, and all the teams were put on that contract vehicle for very specific reasons.

You talked a lot about insurance on the call. Can you talk a little bit about other opportunities in the commercial landscape for the company, other industries or other opportunities?

Yeah. We purposefully designed our commercial because we're still a very small company.

The beauty of the kind of data that we create, it really cuts horizontally. That's all well and good.

Cuz to commercialize it, it's very important, in my opinion, and what's worked for us, to go very vertically and very focused in terms of business use cases. We really very deliberately and thoughtfully targeted the main, the large, and the fastest-growing segments.

That started with insurance. That's why we started there first, and that's why it's the more mature of our segments, and you hear about it more.

We certainly didn't stop there. The transportation nav problem set is an enormous opportunity.

We're just about to do some upsizing of those contract vehicles because we're making tremendous technology progress in that sector, and the demand pull is increasing a lot as well with the commercial customer base. Navigation problems that affect technology, logistics distribution is really important.

Then finally, the telecom set, which is also really important set because we're now having commercial systems that are both terrestrial and space-based. They're integrating.

They're not where they need to be. It's mostly a land-based bottleneck rather than the space-based bottleneck.

I think that's a tremendous opportunity for us, we're investing a lot of time in it.

Switching gears a bit here. What was the catalyst behind switching the company's auditor from KPMG to MNP?

Yeah. One of the things I've said is our goal is to upgrade particularly our U.S.

listing and improve the liquidity profile of that listing, which is essentially, it's been an underutilized opportunity for the company. That requires a whole lot of steps to get there.

Probably the most time-consuming one is complying with the audit standards for the U.S. listing.

We have started. We are a foreign private issuer, but that's a capital F, FPI.

We have taken the step to file our statements on EDGAR, and you can find them on EDGAR and SEDAR now. We're in the process of upgrading our audit to be PCAOB, which is the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board compliant.

That falls out of Sarbanes-Oxley and the financial crisis and new rules and regs around U.S. financial reporting.

We're an IFRS reporter at the moment. We report in U.S.

dollars, but we're an IFRS reporter. In order to lift that IFRS audit up to a PCAOB standard, that is a new audit.

We needed auditors qualified to do that, who were licensed to do that. Our former auditors, the audit group that did us for literally decades, they weren't able to do that.

Their firm out of the U.S. could have done it.

We considered that, and we considered three other firms. We went and hired one that we were really comfortable with and we think is doing a great job.

MNP is uplifting our IFRS accounting to that PCAOB standard, which is going to allow us in turn to upgrade our listing in the U.S. to a higher exchange,

and then improve the liquidity, which is the whole objective there.

Perfect. Okay.

There are several people asking about that uplist, I think that's quite clear that that's the plan. I think last quarter, you said by the end of the year, we're getting close to the end of the year.

There's a lot to do. Do you have an updated timeline on that?

It remains the target, and I'm obviously pushing hard to meet that objective. There are very prescriptive things that need to happen including upgraded controls.

We're a global company. We have employees and revenue and operations all over the world.

We have a lot of work to do in terms of making sure that everything gets uplifted to that standard and then documented as part of the audit. There's just a lot of activity happening there.

We're pushing it as quickly as we can, but there's just physics behind it and stuff that needs to get done. My objective is still the end of the year, but we've got to take it one step at a time.

Okay. We have a number of questions that are fairly specific around companies and probably things that we're not going to answer on a public call.

If I didn't answer your question, please email me and we can get back to you. I don't think we're going to call out specific customers here on this call.

Back to insurance, can you further describe the potential size of the insurance opportunity, and how does that contrast to your perception of the opportunity a year ago?

That's a great question. There's a couple of things going on there.

One, it's, I believe, the largest potential commercial market in the sector, and which is obviously why we've targeted it. It has really, really good use case for what we do as well.

We've been doing it now for a number of years. We're quite smart on it, and we have a lot of customers, and we learn from them and they learn from us.

There's a dynamic there which has allowed us to expand the scope. When we think about that business, there's a couple of things.

One, the primary overriding objective has been to grow by customers. We want to prove value to as many customers, to start, as we can.

That's been an overriding objective. Our go-to-market in that regard has been software-based, and that's worked pretty well for us, and it's worked very well for the customer because it relieves them a lot of burdens and a lot of things that would basically be impossible to do on their own without the benefit of the scale and the benefit of the automation.

We're bringing a lot of value, and that's important. Then I think the other thing is we were purposely going to market in a way that allows us to take a global perspective on it right since day one.

Cuz again, our data with Intermap's unique, quite unique, cuz our data set, 3D data set, is a global data set. It's a very, very rich global data set.

It's over a very long period of time. We have all kinds of archive and history, and our models are very, very special, and they're built on global data sets.

We're looking at every industry we go in, including insurance, from a global perspective. That harmonizes really well, especially with the big carriers, cuz they're based whether they're based in London or New York or wherever, they're taking a global view.

They're running a global business. Each market is different, and each market is regulated in a different way, but fundamentally, from a risk perspective, the key drivers aren't that different.

They're very, very influenced by what we provide. They're global, our customers; we're global; and that's been sort of the approach there.

The opportunity set then also becomes, well, hey, there's massive regions of the world where the protection gap, the uninsured for perils, is really big. It's big in the United States, which I would say is probably one of the more mature markets, but it's massive in other places.

Our customers are looking at the world, and we're looking at the world, and we're going into these new markets together, cuz it's taken several years to establish that kind of a relationship. That's how we're approaching it.

We're going to grow both in scope, we're going to do more for these customers, we're going to grow in terms of the scale and the geographic reach, and we're doing that in partnership with the customers. We're going to grow because the industry is growing.

Each market a little bit differently, but perils are growing globally, and that's a driver. That's a real tailwind for the entire industry.

We're going to grow because governments are stretched. The one that probably gets the most airtime is the U.S., where the NFIP is extremely stretched, and so that's creating, as they retrench, they create more market opportunity for private insurers, which is good because that creates incentives, and that creates proper price discovery.

Things happen where they should happen. People don't build a house where they're not supposed to build it when you have to pay the market rate.

I think it's all good, even though we're dealing with a category nobody wants to hear about a hurricane, right? I think what we're bringing to this is very, very constructive and positive.

There's a huge tailwind there because the government programs are stretched.

Okay. Great.

Another housekeeping one: How is the company dealing with and addressing foreign exchange risk, if there is any?

Yeah. In a couple of ways.

We do have FX lines. We will, for certain situations where we feel like there's excessive exposure, we will hedge it.

Particularly, we'll hedge it from a cost perspective. That's very important.

Then we'll also hedge it from a revenue perspective. It's case-by-case, it's country-by-country.

Even on the most basic level, we're TSX-listed Alberta corp that also reports in U.S. dollars, and we have USDCAD, not as volatile a currency.

We have operations in Eastern Europe, we have operations in Southeast Asia, we have employees in both. We do have FX considerations, both internally and with our revenue and customers, and with our partners and suppliers.

We have an FX line. If need be, for special contracts, we can extend and do much more.

We can also insure, there's government programs, both in the U.S. and Canada, where our FX lines are insured.

We can extend that way, too. There's a lot that goes on behind the scenes on that.

Essentially, the idea is don't take any exchange risk on cost. Then where there's volatility on the top line, mitigate that as well within reason, because if you get too unreasonable, especially in certain markets, the costs can be pretty extreme.

Great. Just looking here to see if there's any more.

I think we've answered most of these questions. Going to give it another minute for anything to show up.

If there's nothing else, then I think we'll wrap it up here. Okay.

I think we're going to wrap it up. I don't see anything else.

If I've missed anything, please email me. There were a lot of questions.

I tried to put as many together as possible so we created a informative discussion here. If I missed anything, please email me.

Happy to get back to you quickly here. Thank you all for joining the call today, and I'll pass it back to Patrick for quick closing remarks, and we'll close it off.

Yeah.

Thank you for joining today, and we look forward to updating you on our progress as we go through future quarters. Have a good night, everyone.

This concludes Intermap's third quarter of 2025 conference call. Thank you for joining.