Thank you, Michelle. Good evening, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for joining us for a discussion on our bank's financial results for the second quarter of the financial year 2027.

We have uploaded the results, along with the presentation, on our website, and I'm sure you had a chance to go through that in detail ahead of this call. I'm joined by Executive Director, Mr.

Jaideep, and CFO, Mr. Bhavin, and other members of our management team to address any questions you may have.

Before we get into the details on the Q2 operational performance, I would like to briefly touch upon the macro trends. The Indian economy continues to demonstrate resilience, supported by the robust domestic demand, healthy services activity, improving manufacturing momentum, that supported by the government policies, and sustained investment.

The GDP growth expectations for FY '27 have been revised upwards to around 7.1%, reflecting the strength of underlying economic activity. High frequency indicators remain encouraging, while credit growth continues to be robust across the banking system, providing a supportive backdrop for the banking sector.

However, the global macroeconomic environment has become increasingly challenging in recent months, with heightened geopolitical tensions, elevated crude oil prices, tighter global financial conditions, and higher interest rates contributing to greater volatility across currency, bond, and capital markets. Inflation risks are likely to remain elevated over the coming quarters, driven by energy, freight, and food-related pressures.

In response, the Reserve Bank of India has raised the repo rate by 25 basis points to 5.5% and shifted its policy stance to calibrated tightening, signaling a continued focus on containing inflationary pressures. It has also undertaken measures to manage currency volatility, including interventions in the spot and forward foreign exchange markets, and the introduction of a special window to meet daily dollar requirements.

Market expectations point to the possibility of further rate increases, while the system liquidity is expected to gradually normalize as surplus liquidity is absorbed. Elevated crude oil prices, weather-related risks, and external uncertainties will therefore remain key monitorables.

Notwithstanding these challenges, India's strong economic fundamentals, the fiscal discipline, and as a sustained domestic demand provide a solid foundation for medium-term growth. Fiscal pressures are modest and government's efforts towards fiscal consolidation are paying off, when several developed economies are on the other side.

Despite rising inflation, the fact that it is rising from a low level and likely to remain within the upper tolerance band of Reserve Bank of India is comforting. The system-wide banking asset quality is robust and, therefore, remain constructive on the outlook for the banking sector, with resilient economic activity and a healthy credit demand expected to support its growth trajectory.

The bilateral and multilateral trade and investment agreements is a lever to navigate external imbalances, while domestic consumption and demographics will shift gear towards higher growth. In a scenario wherein higher interest rates, evolving liquidity conditions, and increased market volatility warrant continued vigilance, we believe that the overall medium-term operating environment within India remains favorable and offers meaningful potential for growth.

In this backdrop, I will briefly touch upon our trends in the quarter. As you are aware, we have generated large amount of liquidity on our balance sheet between the capital raise and the deposits raised during the FCNR(B) scheme.

For context, between both, we have added 35% of our balance sheet as of 31st May 2026. This liquidity is deployed as follows: First, prepaid or chosen not to renew the borrowings and bulk term deposits, which were at a higher cost; grow our business across both wholesale and secured retail, where we have seen demand, and the business conditions continue to remain fairly stable.

The wholesale lending is a highly rated corporates where we want to start or deepen the relationship. The balance liquidity is tactically deployed in a combination of the short-term investments and the short-term loans given to our wholesale customers.

Given the large liquidity still on the balance sheet, we expect to continue this for the next few months. Over the medium term, we expect this liquidity to be fully deployed in the wholesale banking segment, where we want to use both our ability to underwrite larger exposures and the liquidity to strengthen the relationship with the better-rated corporates, and the secured retail through the branch banking route, again, to deepen the customer relationship.

At the same time, while corporate deposits and borrowings have already seen reduction in the cost, we will continue to focus on building granular retail deposit and rationalize our deposit rate gradually. As you may have seen, we have already started on this journey across our savings and term deposits.

We will continue our investments in upgrading our distribution across branches, people, and technology to deepen our network and improve the quality of our products and services. On to asset quality trends in retail.

The collection momentum, including the rural businesses, this quarter has been stable with no disruption so far. However, given deficient monsoons in certain districts, we continue to remain very watchful.

We have also not seen any material impact on our portfolio arising from the conflict in the Middle East so far. In our unsecured retail business, we have seen JLG return to normalcy for a few months now, with the bucket X efficiency consistently close to 99.5%.

We remain confident in the journey of credit cards and have seen the last quarter in line with the path laid out a few quarters ago. We are encouraged with asset quality trends, and we expect slippages to trend materially downwards in line with our guidance in the last quarter.

On to business trends in the quarter. We continue to see robust growth across both sides of the balance sheet.

Our credit rating upgrades have helped us add customers, especially in the wholesale for both advances and deposits. Our advances grew this quarter by 42% year-on-year to ₹1,42,314 crore, and the average advances grew 33% year-on-year.

This includes leverage we provided to the customers of ₹10,300 crore for FCNR deposits, and the liquidity deployment in a better-rated wholesale clients, where we are looking to deepen or start new relationships. Similarly, our deposits grew 34% year-on-year to ₹1,56,272 crore in the quarter.

Average deposits grew 24% Y-o-Y. This includes the FCNR deposits raised by this quarter.

As a result, our average CASA ratio stood at 24% as of 30th September. It would have been 28.1% ex-FCNR deposits.

Some of the milestones achieved in the quarter: One, the balance sheet crossed ₹2 lakh crore to end the quarter at ₹2,22,344 crores, more than doubling over from financial year 2022. The term deposits crossed ₹1 lakh crore to ₹1,13,746 crore.

Operating profit crossed ₹1,000 crore mark to ₹1,396 crore for Q2 FY '27. Cost to income ratio for the quarter was 56.5% versus 70.7% in Q2 FY '26.

In summary, as we look ahead, our growth priorities are focused on building a scalable, resilient, and profitable franchise. Our normal business trends are improving quarter-on-quarter as unsecured stress normalizes.

At the same time, we are working on putting together building blocks, which we will articulate in greater detail over the coming months. Briefly, we would focus on deepening and starting new relationships with large corporates, which were not accessible earlier, either due to constraint of credit rating, capital position, or our cost of funds.

We are also working to target the trade flows in the corridors where ENBD is present, where we believe we have a competitive advantages because of the ENBD network; continuing to build granular and stable liabilities, with the objective of progressively narrowing the cost of deposits gap vis-a-vis the larger banks. At the same time, we want to leverage the momentum from the FCNR deposit relationship we have onboarded to target non-resident flows, starting with the Middle East, and over the time, in all the geographies where ENBD has a presence.

MNC and in sectors like IT and IT services, relationships are being strengthened, especially on the liability and non-funded side, due to group's cross-border strength and the bank's strong credit ratings. We will invest in the distribution infrastructure, be it branches, people, and technology, to strengthen our presence in the relevant geographies.

We will also take early steps on investing in a wealth proposition for our customers. I invite Mr.

Bhavin to take you through the specifics of our results.

Thank you, Mr. Kumar.

Briefly touching on some of the specific aspects of our financial performance. Our advances grew 42% year-on-year to ₹1,42,314 crore in the quarter.

Average advances grew 33% year-on-year. Wholesale advances grew 56% year-on-year.

Retail grew 32% year-on-year. Within wholesale, the corporate segment grew 60% year-on-year, and commercial banking segment grew 47% year-on-year.

While in the retail segment, secured retail assets grew 52% year-on-year, and unsecured retail advances fell 4% year-on-year. Secured retail advances includes the FCNR leverage we have provided to customer of approximately ₹10,300 crores.

The retail-wholesale mix was therefore at 56:44. Our total deposits grew 34% year-on-year to ₹1,56,272 crores.

This was helped by the FCNR deposit. Excluding the FCNR deposit, the growth was 6% year-on-year, as we look to optimize the cost of deposit as mentioned earlier.

Average deposits grew 24% year-on-year. Our CASA grew 14% year-on-year to ₹42,526 crore.

Average LCR for the quarter was at 148%. Now on our operating performance.

Our NII was up 37% year-on-year and 29% sequentially to ₹2,131 crores. Our NIM for the quarter was at 4.61%, an increase of 48 basis point sequentially.

Non-interest income grew 16% year-on-year and 12% sequentially to ₹1,077 crore. This was also helped by foreign exchange income from the FCNR deposits.

Fee income grew 12% year-on-year and 13% sequentially to ₹1,040 crores. Our net total income grew 29% year-on-year and 23% sequentially to ₹3,208 crores.

Our OpEx grew 3% year-on-year and 7% sequentially to ₹1,812 crores. The credit cost for the quarter was at ₹771 crores, or 63 basis points, which included standard asset provisioning of 11%.

The specific credit cost was lower at 52 basis points versus 62 basis points of last quarter, or ₹641 crores vis-a-vis a ₹670 crore for the last quarter. Our net profit for the quarter was up 170% year-on-year and 90% sequentially to ₹482 crores.

On asset quality, GNPA was down 28 basis points sequentially to 1.02%, and net NPA was down 8% sequentially to 0.29%. The PCR stands at 71.5%.

Our capital adequacy ratio was at 30.1% and CET1 ratio was at 29%. With this, we will open the session for question and answers.

Hi. Good evening, everyone, and congratulations on very strong FCNR mobilization in this quarter.

I had seven questions. The first one, if we look at the period end CASA growth, it's up almost 15% Q-o-Q, but the average CASA growth is flat.

Could you just elaborate on progress on various initiatives to strengthen the retail deposit accretion, including branches, etc.? I do notice that the employee head count has been rising, but any progress on strengthening the retail franchise?

That's my first question.

Rikin. As far as the CASA today, what you are seeing it down is a conscious decision to let go some of the high cost, because you saw that we have reduced our CASA rate considerably.

Whenever the rate of interest is reduced in the CASA, there will always be a downward dip, and it just catches up. You would have seen it in two quarters before we reduced the rate and around ₹1,400 crores we lost, and our team could mobilize the same amount within a period of four to five months' time.

The recouping is a little time. Even if suppose any correction takes place, there will be some exits, and those exits will be corrected with the revised rate of interest, number one.

Number two, the strategies are very simple. We are expanding our branches and densifying the respective branches.

That means, the number of people whose productivity has reached the desired level, more number of people are being added in the respective branches. That's where you saw the people addition.

Second, what is being done is that we are just expanding in width wide spread of branches. We will be adding approximately 30 to 50 branches in a quarter.

This quarter branches are proposed to be opened in next two weeks' time. We would have opened it today, but for that crowded program of board and other things, we couldn't do it today.

In another time around 38 branches are getting opened in a couple of weeks' time. The branch expansion is on track.

Now we are going to have a differentiated approach, which is going to be a unique for us, in the sense that we are entering into affluent, which we said almost three, four quarters before that we are getting into wealth business. Now, with ENBD's partnership, we are pretty confident of expanding this growth.

Our segment growth, you would have seen it, it is growing fairly well. It is providing us a lot of confidence because of the various propositions which has been introduced into this particular segment of population.

If you see it, our retail term deposit continues to be growing at a very healthy rate. Last two quarters it did around 22%, 23%.

This time, again, it grew around 16%. That will again continue to grow and support the deposit growth and other things.

Our advances deployment.

We're also raising our NRI proposition, and the journey is well to capture the entire UAE corridor, which will help us to build the liability business.

Got it. The second is a data keeping question.

If you could provide a break-up on loan book mix based on various interest rate benchmarks and also when does repo loan reset happen for your customers?

The reset is a 90-day reset, you would expect that most of the loans will get reset by end of the quarter. We'll see the full benefit in the next quarter.

If you look at overall, about 58% is linked to external benchmarks. 32% is linked to repo.

We have about 11% which is to the FBIL benchmark, 12% to other external benchmarks, and about 3.5%, 4% is basically on the internal MCLR rates.

Got it. The third one is on margins.

How should we think about the trajectory in 3Q and 4Q, because on one hand while you will have full quarter impact of FCNR in 3Q, but on the other hand you may also have interest reversals from, the interest reversal on cards going down and cost of funds may also potentially improve given the recent SA and TD rate cuts you have taken. The outlook on 3Q and 4Q margin trajectory would be helpful.

Rikin, I think there are quite a few pushes and pulls, some of that you've mentioned. On our blended average basis, you would expect it to be slightly lower than what we have reported in this quarter.

It will also depend on the speed at which we can deploy normal advances growth, because a lot of this is now lying in lower yielding investments, and within advances also, we've been tactical. It will be a question of what kind of opportunities we get.

On the margin, I would imagine that we should be slightly lower next quarter and then probably inch up in Q4.

Got it. Q4 inch-up premise on the rate hike that has already happened and, got it.

The fourth question is on--

Got it.

Got it. The fourth one is on bancassurance income.

While it constitutes 8% of your FY '26 fee income and 3% of total revenue, assuming there are no cost offsets and watering down of the IRDAI guidelines, what kind of impact should we expect if this gets rolled out from next year?

Rikin, I think the total banca income, it's generally disclosed in the annual report. I think we have approximately ₹300 crore, plus-minus, of income per annum.

I would imagine, based on plain reading of this, I think that will get substantially impacted. I would imagine anywhere between 50% to 60% impact should be minimum to be penciled in.

I think enough research reports have been written by you guys to make a math of it. We've not done as much detail as you guys have, but you would expect a substantial drop in the fee income which may come through, if nothing changes from this perspective of whether draft circular is implemented the way it is set.

Got it. Fair enough.

The fifth question is on OpEx growth. It has been quite low in the last few quarters, particularly led by the line item of other expenses.

I do see that employee expense has inched up this quarter, presumably due to salary hikes that may have gone, but what kind of growth should we expect on overall OpEx going ahead, assuming some need to invest in the franchise, branches, etc.? I

think,

Rikin, I think there has been an opportunity for us to rationalize certain areas and, including one of the major areas that we've rationalized is collection costs, specifically in cards, and I think that's flowing through. That's been flowing through a bit, that's been part of the reason.

We've now pretty much coming down to normalized rates on that. From here on, I think that there will be an increase.

I think it's a question of how quickly we are able to or what is the kind of quality we want to in terms of adding branches, people. We will also want to invest in certain newer businesses, not exactly new business, but a greater focus on wealth management.

Some expenses will start getting incurred from next couple of quarters onwards. I don't think the delta materially changes.

It'll probably inch up to low single digits, maybe a little higher. We will come back with details on this as and when there is a lot more pen to paper that we put on the model going forward.

Got it. I think some investment in marketing, etc., may also perhaps help.

We have seen some mid-sized banks investing a bit aggressively on marketing. If that happens as well, that would be fairly okay.

The next question is on asset quality. The gross and net slippages have continued to trend down in absolute terms.

You had earlier guided for credit card slippages to come off materially from 3Q onwards. Could you just provide some color on the underlying trends in credit card and how do we think about the improvement in credit cost year-on?

Rikin, yes, the cards slippages are in line with expectations. While the quarter still had a 600-plus number, but if I take the last month number of the quarter, we are already in the 125, 130 zone.

Therefore, I would imagine that that trend should hold, give or take a few percentages here and there. That's something that quite happy to report that while it took us a little more time to get this in order, but we are now actually seeing that on the ground, as we speak.

We would expect credit card slippages to come down to us around a 400 plus-minus number for Q3, Q4 kind of numbers. Therefore, credit costs on cards should come down from the low double digits that we've seen to the 6% zone.

The rest of the businesses will hold where they are, give or take, unless we see any material deterioration in any of the rural businesses, which so far we have not seen at all. Including the October first week collections that we have on retail assets, we've not seen any change in bounce rates or anything like that.

Ceteris paribus, cards comes down from 11 plus-minus to closer to 6, 5.5 to 6 range. Got it.

Jaideep, what was this 125 to 135 number that you mentioned?

Slippages in the month of September.

Monthly.

Monthly,

monthly. Oh.

Got it. Then just the last question on yield on investments.

They have jumped almost 80 basis points sequentially. Is it just this temporary FCNR liquidity parked into money market?

An extension to this that given the yields have moved up sharply, should we expect any significant MTM on investment book in the coming quarters?

We've stayed light on duration. Rikin, no problems on that, on mark-to-market.

Second part of your question. On yields, of course, money market has given us opportunity to maximize on yields, and we've done that.

Whatever uptick you are seeing is thanks to that. There we don't carry too much of duration.

Understood. Thank you so much for answering all the questions.

That's all from my side.

Thank you.

Thanks for taking the question. Again coming on to the margin side.

When we would look at it in terms of this deployment of the liquidity, if you can highlight in terms of what is the incremental yield compared to that of the book yield, which is there at 10.8 odd percent, and maybe what is the kind of decline which we can expect. The savings rate tweak which you had done recently, maybe from 5-odd percent cost of SA, where do we actually see that coming down?

No doubt you have indicated some directional trend on margins, but maybe specifically on yield and cost of deposits, how the trend should be?

Kunal, let me see if I can give an answer. Let me explain, right?

There are so many moving parts, and I'll give you some of those which will help you maybe build something. If you see yield on advances, which has gone down from 11.2 to 10.8, if you actually see individual segments, nothing has gone down.

It's just a mix issue. As wholesale has picked up and the unsecured retail has come down, that is reflecting in what's happening on the yield on assets.

The yield on assets obviously is impacted also by the FCNR leverage that we have done. If you actually exclude that, this number would be another 10, 15 basis points higher.

It's more a mix issue rather than an incremental yield issue at an individual product level. Now, the way to think about it from a going forward perspective as well, the liquidity which is generated is currently sitting in investments, in non-SLR investments, which is still lower than what the advances yield are.

Going forward, as your stage one will be the fact that we'll move from the investment yield to wholesale yield, and from then wholesale yield to the blended advances yield. That's a journey, but it's not a one-quarter, two-quarter journey.

That's going to take a little bit longer. That's on the positive side.

The flip of this is that you will see a full-quarter impact of the FCNR leverage given in GIFT, because you see only a month and a half or that's just a little bit more than a month in this quarter. That full-quarter impact will come, and offset somewhat by the increase in the repo rate, which will flow through a little bit in this quarter and a little bit in the next quarter.

Too many moving parts to actually pinpoint on. We're fairly confident to say you will see a little bit of reduction in the next quarter just on account of where the mix is sitting right now on the balance sheet.

As that moves forward, you would see an increase going through, but pace of that will remain on deployment of the liquidity which is available.

Kunal, I think the longer term, I think we will also want to see trends where liability costs come down, as we rationalize retail deposits, savings account deposits, as our mix of current accounts and savings accounts improve from here on, because I'm hoping that this is as low as one gets, given that we are saddled with FCNR as well as a one-off event. I think the idea would be to reduce rates on liabilities as well as improve the mix over time to add to margin, and then some of that we will be more than happy to lose to the kind of lending that we will look forward to doing over the next few quarters.

Sure. In terms of the provisioning, there is a standard asset provisioning, which obviously on this ₹26,000 crores of incremental advances which have been built, we would have taken 40 basis of 40 basis points of provisioning, but besides that, was there any other standard asset provisioning or buffer which was created during the quarter?

No.

No, not specifically, no, sir.

Between what was provided for a FCNR, because there are two specific things. One is the entire FCNR on which you have to carry the 40, and the pick up in gross loans itself, right?

While it doesn't show in average, right.

Yeah. Absolutely.

Yeah.

That's the larger one. No buffers on the standard asset side only.

How much was credit card in the overall provisioning? You said it might come down to 6-odd percent, which is closer to 400-odd crores.

Okay. Maybe currently is it still near 600, 650, and that's the delta maybe 200, 250-odd crores which we could see on the credit cost side?

Our cards provisioning for the quarter was approximately ₹575 crores. Yes, this should come off a reasonable bit.

Yeah. So, 6% would almost on 27,500 would translate to 400.

Almost 175-odd crores on credit cost getting into the second half.

Yeah. What is the total amount you said?

20,000 yeah, that's right. Roughly ₹20,000 crores.

Yeah. Cards

is about 19,000.

Got it. One last question.

Maybe this year would still have some FCNR noise, but getting into FY '28, what would be our overall guidance on the ROA trajectory, the overall growth, looking at the higher base which would have been set already in FY '27, if you can just provide that outlook, that would be really helpful in terms of how we are looking, because there is a huge liquidity, almost 35% of balance sheet liquidity, good time to reconstruct the balance sheet and improve the ROA profile. What would be your targeted ROA for FY '28?

Kunal, I would rather say that we settle down with what you're seeing it now and the immediate growth what you're looking at. With regard to what is '28 and all, no, let us let us wait for some more time, and then I I did say that over a period of next few months, we will come back to you with the complete details.

Now let us settle down with the current 0.92 and how it is looking positive for next couple of quarters.

Kunal Kunal, just to kind of give a little bit of flavor here, see, it's very interesting to have a situation where there is a significant amount of liquidity between FCNR and equity, which is effectively fixed rate, in a rising rate environment. There will be tailwind to margins.

There is tailwind to growth. Clearly, I think the fact that our BAU business, which is excluding all this noise, is obviously trending much better in terms of credit costs.

Predominantly cards, MFI is pretty much normalized. I think one should see significant tailwinds, but I don't think we would want to comment at specifics at this stage.

Okay. Thanks.

This is helpful and all the best for the future quarters. Thank you.

Thanks for the opportunity. Sir, data keeping, end of period term deposit versus last end of period, there seems to be a delta of 26, ₹27,000 crores, and we raised 34,000 of FCNR.

If you could tell me as of 2Q end, what is the stock of FCNR on the book as of September end? Against that, can you also tell me the stock of wholesale deposits plus wholesale borrowings, some of which we could expect to be repaid in the third quarter?

FCNR EOP only is around ₹32,300 crores or something like that. Other things, it is a downward trend.

I don't have exact number.

No, we'll maybe pick it up offline. See, in effect, in direct to explain to you bit through saying what's the generation of FCNR deposit has allowed us to not necessarily renew some of these due to time deposits which we had on the books.

We've chosen consciously to let go or run down some of the high-cost time deposits. As a result, maybe it's your math not working out, but maybe we can pick it up offline and we'll see.

Sir, maybe you can just let us know what is the amount you've run down this quarter and how much do you plan to run down next quarter?

It doesn't work that way, right, because what comes up for renewal is what we can run down, and we are still willing to pick up all deposits which is available at a particular price point. Correct?

It's not a conscious call. It's more about the fact that what comes in when there's a rate which is available, it's a choice of the customer.

If a customer renews with us, we're happy to renew it at our rate. It's not like I'm telling no to a customer.

It's just that I've put up a rate which if the customer is happy with, they will come. I don't have a number to say this is what I'm running off, unlike a, let's say, a borrowing which I may consciously say I will run off, which is what we already done in the first quarter.

Understood, sir. Thanks.

Sir, second question is on more of a two-year or slightly outer-year question, not immediate quarter. Sir, we currently have this liquidity deployed in G-Sec yielding decent 7% or maybe slightly lower.

We are increasing our mix on corporate, clearly doubling down. Sir, I can understand near-term margins will look up after 3Q, maybe an inch-up in 4Q.

With the mix shift happening, is it fair to assume directionally we are looking at a lower NIM, lower credit cost model, let's say FY '28, '29? Should we think about it like that?

I don't have an answer to that, and I do want to leave a thought what Jaideep mentioned earlier. I'll draw your attention to slide eight, on the right-hand side bottom.

You see that quarter-on-quarter, our total cost of funds is coming down, our cost of time deposit is also coming down. While you will see a little bit lower yield on assets, you would expect that to be either coincidentally or with a lag, the cost of funds catching up as well.

We're not telling you that I'll continue with a high NIM or, et cetera. NIM is a function finally of what happens to what the credit cost and what's the.

At the end of the day, customer profitability is important, not necessarily individual productivity or individual product-level line items, right. There are two levers here, and we'll try and play both of them, with the hope that we continue to be in a elevated net interest margin levels from where we are.

No guidance per se to say it's coming down or staying there or not, right. It's too many moving parts.

Understood. Sir, last question is on the SA growth, low single-digit sequentially, not in line with the rest of the balance sheet.

Is there any number in your mind that if you're unable to grow SA at this pace, you're willing to slow down balance sheet growth or at this point it is not consequential? No, no.

How are you linking SA to balance sheet growth, I do not know. Anyway, the SA growth we have decided, as I said a little while earlier to Rikin, we are going to expand the branches.

We are getting into NR segment, which is hitherto we were not able to penetrate much. This will see a lot of positive growth in SA as we move forward in coming quarters.

Sequential growth in SA.

Sir, I was saying is it a prerequisite for you for SA to grow at least, let's say, double digit for to continue the balance sheet growth, or you're willing to wait till it builds out over the next one or two years?

See, I think we will want to look at CA and SA as well together. I think there are multiple things here.

The fact that we want to go down the path of lower funding costs is a reasonable assumption to have. Now, that will come down through a combination of higher access to wholesale deposits, because a lot more corporates are willing to now bank with us given rating profile, etc.

There is a large amount of trade corridor business that one will look at, which will also come along with its current account opportunities. There will be an increased focus on NR, as Mr.

Kumar mentioned. I think it's a combination.

Maybe the better way to look at it is, will we continue to grow loan book when our cost of funds is going up or not coming down? Probably, there will be some level of give and take that we will need to look at.

I don't think we will link it to any single metric like you're talking about.

That perfectly answers my question, sir. Thank you very much and congratulations on a great set of numbers.

Hi, team. Congrats on the quarter.

Just firstly, one question. Bhavin, did I hear you correctly when you said cost of deposits, the 5.97 number is ex-FCNR?

Sorry?

Ex-FCNR, right,

yeah. Oh,

no. That's one which is total deposit is there, but you've broken that up into the TD and SA separately.

You can see that on the page eight.

Page eight has the details. Page eight, right-hand side bottom chart gives you the break-up of cost of SA, cost of TD, and cost of INR TD.

The cost of TD of 6.86 is FCNR and INR both?

Correct. That is correct.

That's correct. Got it.

Only

INR is 7.12.

Understood. Okay.

That clarifies. Just firstly, from a wholesale lending perspective, now you mentioned a few times that wholesale lending is a priority with high-quality corporates.

How should we think about over the next, say, one, one and a half years, what is your target ROA in this segment? For example, hypothetically, if you think you'll make an ROA of 50 bps lending to some Tata company, would you do that business or not?

Piran, that's not the way actually think about it at all, especially at this point of time, but generally as well, I would think, because you need to look at, on the wholesale side especially, you have to look at the risk-adjusted capital-adjusted returns and not necessarily pure ROA. That's a separately.

Right now from our standpoint, the way you think about this is what money is sitting right now in a liquidity, in a short-term money market instrument, would I lend to what you mentioned? Absolutely, because there's a clear pick-up of 50, 60, 70 basis points from where it is.

Right? That's the way you start thinking about it given where our position is.

I would generally say for a bank who doesn't have an excess liquidity that we have would also still think of a wholesale not necessarily only from an ROA standpoint, but a larger relationship that they would have. It's definitely consumes less capital, right?

These are not constraints that I have as a bank.

Got it. Maybe it's too soon Sorry, were you saying something?

No, no. Go on.

Yeah. No, maybe it's too soon, but any targets that the board now has for management over the next three years or so that you can share with us?

Nothing of that sort now.

Okay. Piran,

I think we are in a situation where there is enough and more

activities

to be done, and I think it will take some time for us to put all that together and look at any specifics for the longer term.

Understood. Is a name change on the cards also soon?

See, we told you sometime back now, RBL Bank name is there, and we'll deliberate and then do any based on the market feedback and other things. We'll take a call at the appropriate time.

Got it. Just lastly, given that we are pretty close to ECL transition, how do we think about steady state credit costs, the impact of that from next year onwards?

Again, there's just too many moving parts. A lot of things will depend on the mix.

The way we are seeing it right now is at an individual product line level, whether it is credit cards, whether it's the microfinance business, or the secured retail business, wholesale has always been pristine. We've not seen a mishap in wholesale for a while.

We've seen individual product lines all trend better, and we would expect that to continue, especially given that we would start moving up the value chain in terms of the customer profiling and selection as well. A lot of the absolute credit cost at a bank level will depend on the mix, which I don't really have a view point at this point of time at what the mix would be at the end of next year to be able to give you a sense of that.

Got it. Okay.

That's it from my end. Thanks, and wish you all the best.

Hi, good evening. Thanks for taking my question.

Firstly on the NII for the quarter, quarter-on-quarter, the NII is up ₹476 crores. Could you help me with the walk of that, because when I do the rough math, the capital itself contributes that much, which seems to indicate that the rest of the business we did didn't accrue much NII.

What am I doing wrong over here? Yeah.

The rough math is ₹27,000 crores into 7% by four. It comes to a similar number, yeah.

The capital,

if you can give us opportunities to deploy risk-free quickly 7%, please meet us after the call. No,

there are two, three things, right? There's part of a little bit of there was in the first quarter as well.

It's not necessarily just the second quarter. That, you need to adjust that, right?

It's not that it makes too much of a difference, but there is a little bit of there. As Jaideep mentioned, the ability to say that I can deploy everything at seven is even today not the case, actually.

Had you, by the way, done the seven and you would have actually be sitting on right now a mark-to-market given the fact that rates are. You have to be very careful of deployment when we did at that point of time to saying we need to be putting in a place that hike expectations were around for a while.

You've actually gone short on duration in the initial piece. Your expectation of seven for the full ₹27,000 crore which came out of capital and ₹30,000 crore which ₹34,000 crore came out of the FCNR is a little bit of ambitious rate to go with.

It's very difficult to now say, listen, for capital it is this much and FCNR it is this much. It's, with hypothetical, you can keep doing that, but you will keep growing in a manner which is sustainable, is the only thing that I can say.

Drag from FCNR also.

Fair, fair. Was there a negative drag from FCNR in this quarter?

Is that something that there as in

on absolute? NII will not be a negative, net interest margin will be a negative drag.

Got it, got it. Not absolute NII, yeah, yeah.

Yeah.

Absolute NII is not a drag.

Okay. Secondly on fee income, right, if I look at retail fee, it is growing at 9%.

Your overall core fee you're saying is growing at 12%. It is lagging the balance sheet growth.

Now, if we are say focusing more on wholesale going ahead, is that sort of par for course going ahead because of the cards business, pressure from the cards business, or how do we think about this line going ahead, yeah?

Again, this is a very unique quarter where the balance sheet has grown many fold on account of the FCNR, and not just the deposit which is landed in the country. If you recall, there's also a leverage that we did outside.

Actually, the balance sheet growth is multiplied by that, and you would expect that you would not expect too much of processing fee out of the FCNR piece. Having said that, as you start dealing with a better-rated customers, better-rated corporates, your ability to extract fee then becomes that much more challenging.

I wouldn't encourage you to link it to the balance sheet growth, but we will as we start thinking of trade, as we start thinking of some of the processing side of things, we would expect that to grow as well. Work in progress, as we start detailing out some of these things, we should be in a better position to model it as well.

Got it. Fair enough.

This quarter, there is no one-off in the fee, right, FCNR related, anything?

No, there will be a little bit on an FCNR on the fee because of the currency swap that would have happened, the fixed-to-floating swap as well. There is a one-off, which is why you see sequentially fee going up by 12%, right?

That you cannot expect that to happen on an ongoing basis.

Okay. Largely that is the one-off fee, okay.

Fair enough.

That is correct.

Okay. I think this was asked earlier, just one last question.

The OpEx will also, from here on, this is the more normalized trend, because in the first quarter, the number was sharply lower. Is this the more normalized trend, say, going into the second half?

See,

more or less, it is trending in that line. There may be a small uptick with our investment in the branches go up or investment in the people goes up, with technology.

It's not materially way away from what you have been showing it. There'll be a marginal increase will be there in the OpEx.

Got it. We are still committed to 1,000 branches in two years that we had called out earlier?

Around 2.5, three years, you can put in that way, because if you just have around 30, 40 branches, it will close to 1,000. 2.5, three years maximum.

Okay. Sir, when does the ENBD India business acquisition get completed?

This is the amalgamation application has been submitted to the Reserve Bank of India. Once the application is approved by them, thereafter, it will start.

Definitely, in this financial year.

Okay. Thank you so much.

Congrats on the quarter. Thank you.

Yeah. Hi, sir.

This is Jay. Thanks for the opportunity, and congratulations on the quarter.

Sir, most of the questions have been asked. I just wanted to check on the loan growth, overall loan growth.

Right, this quarter was maybe an exceptional because of excess liquidity and strong capital, which still stays. A little bit of that still stays.

How to look at the overall loan growth for the bank going into for FY '27, and maybe if you have a view on FY '28 also?

It's too long a period you asked about it. See, this quarter is in 40% is an exception, no doubt about it, which you also said it.

You just look back in March and the June, we said the base line of within 22% to 25%, so that base line will be continued as we move forward. That's a minimum.

If I do that, sir, then it would mean that we may have actually a negative Q-o-Q growth also. That is why I was thinking that, at least for this year, could it be 30% or maybe more than 30 types?

Let us look at the,

see, it all depends upon an opportunity and availability. The baseline is what we have planned about.

Sorry, I've got what he meant. You might want to model a 6% or a 5% to 6% quarterly number.

Whatever that translates into, you're right. Y-o-Y because of this increase will be higher.

Right,

right. Okay.

When we, let's say, on a normalized 25% types, are you seeing any opportunity for credit card growth also and MFI? What would be your, let's say, baseline projection for credit card business going into FY '27, and maybe FY MFI also?

On cards, we expect to stop degrowing in a quarter, hopefully, this coming quarter is a festive season, we'll have some

balances

build up. I think, given that we will also move towards better quality and stuff like that, I would imagine and the industry also kind of not really showing massive growth, we will be happy with a low double-digit kind of a growth, high single-digit, low double-digit kind of growth on cards.

If you look at industry, given the guard rails and, fortunately, all the players adhering to the guard rails, again, and it's a short product, as you know. It's a 24-month product.

There is a large amount of runoff that happens every month. Again, the growth rates are going to be in that zone, is the way I would look at it right now.

Sure. On the wealth business, right, so that could be a new area of focus.

Let's say, what are the milestone for us to track? Do you have the product team already there, or after this transition, you would like to introduce new products and that So, where are we in the entire wealth business?

Is it set up? Are the products ready, or it will take some time for you to reintroduce this product?

I'll take you back to what Mr. Kumar mentioned, and I'll just say it again, saying, taking early step into investing in a wealth proposition for our customers.

It's very, very early, and we will, whether it's a product, whether it is the proposition, whether it's the RMs, will take time to build. Don't expect something to be launched next week.

Sure, Bhavin. Lastly, if you have the movement for AFS reserves just because the yields have risen quite sharply.

If you have the Q2 number and maybe at the end of Q1 number. Thank you.

What is it?

We are at ₹43,000 crore of book right now. Previous quarter was ₹37,700 crores.

That's the size of book right now.

No, no. AFS reserve, sorry.

No. We'll get back to you offline on this one.

Not something handy. Sure,

sure.

Hey, thank you for the opportunity. My first question is on LCR.

Now, the LCR is 148%. In a couple of quarters' time when we have time to deploy excess liquidity, what kind of LCR do we want to run in a normalized scenario?

Normally we would want to be in the 120 to 125 zone on LCR, because there will always be some cushion that we will want to keep.

Got it. On your earlier comments that we still want to have a gradual reduction in SA and TD rates, is this by an expected maybe 75 basis points of rate hike?

Should we understand that your SA and TD will still come down despite that?

SA would be a gradual. TD rates, I think I would caveat that by saying that it'll obviously be a function of economic interest rates.

When we say reduction, it will be relative to what we see in the markets.

Got it. My last question is on the ROA.

We mentioned that the credit cost should come down by about 200 crores. In this quarter, we have about 100 crores of standard asset provision, which will not happen in a normal business.

Clean credit cost has a 300 crores of reduction after this quarter. That itself is 70, 80 basis points of ROA.

Should we think about 1.5% ROA going forward as a baseline? Or how should we think about that?

I think

sorry, we couldn't hear you very clearly, but if I understood you're right that there will be a

Clean credit cost. Yeah.

Credit costs can reduce to 100 crores from here. Right?

This quarter. In the second quarter, there's 100 crores of standard asset provisioning.

That's not going to repeat. So, 300 crores reduction itself give you 70, 80 basis points for ROA.

Should we expect 90 plus 70 basis points for ROA?

We can take it offline. You just get in touch with us.

Hi. Thank you for the opportunity.

This is Avadhoot Joshi from Trivantage Capital. My question is on the wholesale advances.

Last two quarters, we have seen a significant growth into the wholesale advances. I want to just have a breakup of it.

Which are the sectors we are lending majorly to? That's first.

Secondly, in the beginning, you have put up short-term lending is also happening. What's the proportion of it to?

The third part is IT and IT-related MNCs you mentioned into the beginning that lending is happening to that part also. Is it to IT or IT-related, or is it more to a AI-related capex going on?

These are the three questions just broadly on the wholesale advances. Thank you.

The third one was more in the context of deposits, because we have now access to a lot wider section of corporates. On sectors, I think we've not seen any single sector stand out.

I think if we look at while the headline growth of percentage looks high, but in the larger scheme of things, this is, maybe 0.75% to 1% of incremental growth that the system would have seen. It is largely working capital driven.

Yes, we've taken some bites on project finance or longer-term loans, but predominantly continues to be working capital driven, which is what Bhavin said that we are looking at trade related opportunities that are coming our way. The reduction in corporate deposits, which is already, let's say, reflecting the rating upgrade and the demand supply mismatch in our favor that we have, where we need lesser deposits and there is a wider population of constituents willing to give deposits, I think that's reflected in the rates at which we can raise corporate deposits.

That's allowing us to get into hitherto difficult opportunities given the advantages that we have. I don't think there is any specific sectoral trend that we are either chasing or seeing.

Understood.

Understood. Thank you and all the best.

Yeah. Hi, good evening.

Thanks for taking my question. Sir, the question was regarding the unsecured loan.

On a sequential basis, the overall unsecured pie is flattish. Let's say, from this year perspective, what is the sort of growth that we are looking at?

Typically ballpark, what is the drag of 1 percentage point shift from unsecured to secured mix? Is it 12 basis points?

Broadly 20, 21%, 22% is the yield on the unsecured loan, and the secured retail would be more close to 9%, 10%. Is that math right?

I think the mix math is broadly right. 21% plus-minus would be the yields on unsecured.

In terms of growth, as I mentioned earlier, I think cards we expect to start seeing at least some positive growth in the next six months before we start delivering 10% to 12% growth for next year. In microfinance, I think we should look at, again,

25% Y-o-Y.

Year-on-year growth is quite strong, but sequentially, we will probably see 5%, 6%

5 5

5% growth of microfinance. See,

the strategy for the microfinance is very simple. We wanted to grow only to the extent what we wanted for the PSL.

This is not an engine which is going to add up the numbers, primarily for PSL.

Understood. Next year, sir, coming to F '28, currently, if I look at the share of unsecured is about 19%.

Where does this share settle?

You can look at an overall growth of, let's say, early to mid-20s and an unsecured growth of, let's say, high single digit. Or low double digit.

For next year?

I think we'll be guiding a loan growth of some early In

the same order.

Okay. Same for FY '28 as well?

Hello?

The share will be more or less in the same range. You can just keep it that way.

Slightly lower.

Okay. Understood.

Understood. My second question is on the interest expense line.

If I look at the overall balance sheet has expanded by 25% sequentially, but the interest expense seems to be flat. Probably is explained by the average deposits and period-end deposits.

Is that the sole reason? Deposit typically on an average came mostly towards the end of the period, and hence the interest expense is flattish in this quarter?

It's a mixture of what you're mentioning and a mixture of the fact that we've let go of some of the high-cost deposits as well, which is coming through.

Then

you will see coming.

Also the balance sheet got funded by equity,

right?

Full impact of equity is found this time,

right?

Naturally,

I was only mentioning the deposit.

Cost of deposit.

Cost of deposits. Sure.

Sure. Got it.

No, perfect. That's all from my side.

Thank you.