Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the presentation of our full year 2025 financial results. My name is Jan Van Geet, and I'm the CEO of VGP, as most of I think.

I'll first start with a little executive summary and the highlights of 2025. We recorded a pre-tax profit of €338 million, an increase of €19 million or 6% higher than the full year of 2024.

Our net asset value grew 8.3% up to €2.6 billion, and the EPRA NTA is up 9%. We have an EBITDA growth of 28% to €454.7 million, 13.5% increase.

What makes me happy is the historic record of €106.7 million of new and renewed leases, which I will go to more detail later on. The annualized committed leases at the year-end stand now at €468.3 million.

We have 1,052,000 square meters under construction, and our development pipeline is 75% pre-let. I can add to that that we have signed a lot of LOIs, which are in final negotiation.

We think that by the end of the first quarter, most of them will translate into new lease agreements, and if they do, and we expect they do because we are finalizing the lease agreements with them, we will have a new record of more than €80 million of signed lease agreements to be started up in the new year. We are having a solid pipeline to be started up already, which is fully pre-let.

We delivered almost 500,000 square meters last year, 99% let, and the last unit has just been agreed upon. It's a small unit in Koblenz with somebody from the defense industry.

We have 1.4 million square meters of land acquired, and our total secured land bank stands at 10.3 million square meters, which represents a development potential of at least 4.3 million square meters. We did a net cash recycling of €389 million through a transaction with our joint venture partner in the SAGA joint venture, and that led to an additional €60.5 million realized profits in 2025.

We target another material closing with the SAGA as we already announced it in August last year. We announced that we were going to do €1 billion, I think we'll do a bit more, in the second half of 2026, for which we have already all of the assets aligned.

It will be a material closing. We'll go more in detail also later on that.

Then finally, VGP and East Capital have agreed to set up at least a €1.5 billion of gross asset value Pan-European fund with an emphasis on Central and Eastern Europe. We know East Capital already for 15 years.

They are a very reputable boutique fund manager from out of Sweden, which have quite some track record in Eastern European assets and the fund management thereof. The board of directors proposes an ordinary dividend of €92.8 million, which is 3% higher than the ordinary dividend of 2024 or €3.4 per share.

If we look at the summary of the financial results and you see that the steady growth of the total portfolio value goes up for the full year at 100%, including the joint ventures portfolio at 100%, with €900 million almost, from €7.8 billion to €8.7 billion. We have a continued strong growth in committed annualized rental income.

It grew 13.5% year-on-year. We're getting bigger every year, it's more and more difficult to beat that, but we're going to do our best this year.

I think we're going to be able to set another nice year. We have a lot of demand in the pipeline.

The full year of 2024, we had €412.6 million at the end of the year committed annualized rental income, and at the end of 2025, we had €468.3 million. The EBITDA increased 28%.

Piet will go more in detail later on, which followed actually a very solid performance in all of our business segments. It went up from €354.4 million in 2024 to €454.7 million in 2025.

Then I already told you about the dividend, which will grow with 3% to we propose in any way to €3.4 per share. I'll first go a little bit on the market and the market update.

These are not our slides, these are slides which we got from Jones Lang LaSalle, and I will compare our own performance a little bit to that. If we look at demand and occupier segments, then you see that the take-up share by sector, and then you see that the third-party logistics are still the biggest one.

We have very little third-party logistics inside of our own portfolio. We have most end users and then also longer-term lease agreements.

We see a very big comeback from e-commerce. It is bigger than what we have in here, and what we have in the pipeline now, what we are working on, is also very e-commerce determined.

We see them coming back. We see that there is more and more and more demand from out of that sector.

It's not only Chinese companies, also they are here, but it's mostly Western European and American people who are coming back to the market. We also see a lot more demand now from the defense sector.

We have been able to secure some of them, and we are also currently negotiating with some of them for some new manufacturing things in the pipeline. The vacancy rate has gone up a lot over the past quarters.

It actually doubled from 3% to 6.2%, but that compares in our own portfolio to we are a little bit more than 98% let at the moment. We see healthy demand, and we also see that there is a lot less speculative construction in the market.

The vacancy levels, we expect them to go down in the future. If you compare to all the markets which you see right next to them, there where we are, Budapest, we have zero vacancy; Madrid, we have zero vacancy; if you look at Bratislava, we have zero vacancy at the moment; in Milan, we have zero vacancy; in Prague, we have zero vacancy.

Of course, some of these are also speculative buildings which have been started up over the last quarters. On the supply, you can see that the built-to-suit over the last 3 years is quite flat.

The 2023, '24, and '25 levels have remained stable, but you see that the speculative development is coming down quite a lot, which gives us a good view on that there will be soon not so much available anymore in the market because there is quite some take-up over the last year also. We have 16.2 million square meters space under construction, which is the lowest level in the past 5 years now.

Capital markets, I don't know if we can say something intelligent on it. Last year started very well, and we did a very large transaction, €509 million in the second half year, so that also contributes to it.

We saw that over the whole year, the transactions went up both in volume and in size, but mostly in the smaller markets. On the major markets, only UK, the Netherlands, and Poland posted a year-on-year growth.

The yields have been relatively flat, you can see that very well. We've had a devaluation on some of our German assets because our valuator takes the view that the re-letting should take a longer period.

He has made that from 12 months to 18 months. Piet will go in detail to it.

We have seen that in Germany, what has come available over the year, we have been able to re-let on average in 2 days, not more, and we have a 21% uptake on the rental income of what we have re-let. We can't really concur to that view, but it is what it is in the market.

That's what our valuator thinks of it, but it's not visible in our own portfolio. I will go through the operational performance for the full year.

Maybe I just go back. This is our park in Arad which we've just started, and the building which you see on the right side is a building which we constructed for VAT.

VAT is a vacuum valve producer for the semiconductor industry, a very specialized product production. It's got 12,000 square meters of clean rooms inside at a very high level, and we have achieved with that building BREEAM Outstanding score of 96.2%, which is the highest of any industrial building in the world last year.

No, overall, overall the years in BREEAM Outstanding. Just and this is our park in Valsamoggia, which is also fully let and which we've transacted last year to our joint venture with SAGA, with our friends from AREIM.

As I already said, we had a record year in committed rental income, including the JVs at 100%. The group has 465 tenants, but that's divided over more than 650 lease agreements, as you can see.

We have a lot of tenants which come multi times back into our buildings. The committed annualized leases as of 31st of December stand at €468.3 million, occupancy rate 98%, and it's filling up really very well.

At the moment, we really have quite some demand in our portfolio. If we make the bridge, then you see that the committed annualized rental income started with €400 and I think it's 13, yeah, €412 and a bit.

We signed new leases almost €57 million. We have €6.5 million of indexations.

We have some amendments in leases, people who wanted some other space or differentiate their space. Then we had €8.9 million of terminations, and we sold one building in Riga to its user, to Jysk, which declined also €2.4 million of rental income, and that brought us to the €468 which we had at the year-end.

Meanwhile, we've signed quite some leases already, and we're looking forward to be able to report you after the first quarter because, as I said, we have quite some nice LOIs in the pipeline. The majority of the new contracts which we signed were within the logistics segment.

I have some examples. Logistics was 67.9%, but as I said, we have very little third-party logistics.

You don't see many third-party logistics also in the names here. We signed with Studenac, which is one of the largest retailers in the Balkans, a very nice cooled warehouse, which is delivered this week.

We signed with ALDI, a very nice new warehouse, which we're going to start construction in a couple of weeks in Frankenthal. That's a big one, 60,000 square meters.

We signed a very nice lease with Movianto, healthcare-dedicated logistics, that's a third-party logistic. You see Heineken, Eureka, Duomed, Ursus, Farmcol, Studenac, they are all end users and they use their own facilities and sometimes use somebody to operate it.

This is something which changes all the time, but e-commerce was last year 16.5%, and I expect it to be quite a bit higher this year. Light industrial 14%, but that's just a move in time because we also had quite some demand from light industrial over the past years.

Our portfolio is leased to a very diversified and blue-chip tenant base, and the weighted average lease term, it's already years stable, is 7.8 years as we keep on growing and most of the leases are relatively long-term signed. The top 10 tenants represent 29.7% of committed leases, but also there, these represent 28 different lease agreements in many different jurisdictions.

It's well spread, the risk of it. If you look in here, that this is a little bit the longer term.

The logistics represent 47% in our total portfolio, light industrial 34%, and e-commerce 17%. We have some others, we have some

Siemens.

It's mainly Siemens, yes, where Siemens is in Nuremberg, it's a site where we have offices and which we are going to start rebuilding this year completely. This year, we have some quite iconic projects which are upcoming and about which I will tell a little bit more afterwards in the outlook because we are going to really have some land plots coming online which are from which we expect really a very nice contribution in the coming 12 to 24 months.

If you look at VGP at a glance and you look we we are always looking forward in how can we grow and where can we grow and which segments can we grow. Of course, the main part the main raw material to be able to grow is the land bank because we always grow organically.

We develop everything ourselves, we don't buy any standing assets. If you look at the December '24 net cash generative rental income, things which were delivered and really generated cash, it was €350 million or €240 million at share.

During 2025, we activated €39 million of new leases, it went up with 11% to €389 million or €236 million at share, including 50% of the joint ventures if you look at it. The signed leases which are still under construction and which will be added on in the next 12 to 18 months is another €79 million, and so that's another 18%, and that takes us to €468 million of income-generating activities or €310 million at share of income-generating lease agreements, of which €321.7 million sits in the joint ventures.

If you look at our land bank which we have today, and the ERV of the vacancy and the development pipeline which we have, that's another roughly €300 million, which takes us the potential up to €766 million or at this moment €602 million at share. We are trying to accelerate our development pace as much as we can now.

The development activity, talking about acceleration, drives our second strongest EBITDA in our history. If you look, there is a couple of notes which I need to say to this.

You see very well the division between East and West. In 2021 and in 2020, we had big start-ups in Western Europe because we had this big leases in Gießen and in Munich, which started up at that time.

You see also that in 2022, we delivered and then we started up a lot less because of the big inflation. I told you that I was standing very much on the brake at that point because I was afraid about having too much vacancy with buildings for which we paid far too much.

Now we have our costs very well under control, our margins are going up relatively quickly. We have very sound margins again, which you can also see in the revaluation result because the revaluation result in this year, I think it's €183 million, is pure and only revaluations from new activities, from things which we have started up, whereas in 2021, it was a little bit a distorted image because there was also a big uptake in valuations of course in the standing portfolio as yields were going down with very steep declining interest rates.

Out of the €634 million record EBITDA in 2021, only €81 million was really cash income, recurrent income. Out of the €455 million EBITDA in 2025, it's €249 million.

Which says a little bit also about the resilience of our result going forward. It's more and more regenerative income.

The net rental and renewable energy income at share has grown a lot year-on-year with 18% in 2025. If you look at it, we are now at €223.384 million in 2025, which we expect a continuous growth in 2026.

In the renewable energy, about which Martijn will tell you a lot more later on, we have now a lot diversified also into battery projects. Battery projects which have a very high yielding on their investment, and of which we have foreseen to construct quite a lot in 2026 as now we have the permits coming into place in order to be able to do that.

We also, thanks to the brownfields which we have been buying over the past years, most of them have been big factories with enormous electrical connections. For example, we bought Hagen.

Hagen has 90 MW connection of energy, which not only allows us, if we can't deliver back, very nice battery projects, big in size, but it also opens the potential, and it's very congested today, to be able to do a more data center exercise. We are trying to take a look at it, whether we could implement a data center also in Hagen, whether the location is the right one.

At the moment, we have two identified together with Sarah, our new employee who came from Microsoft. One is in Rüsselsheim and one is in Paderno, and on both we are very well advanced on the permitting side.

We are advancing very well. It will take a little bit more time.

These are complex exercises also, but we are on a good way to be able to realize them soon. It's our ambition to have something by the year-end to be able to say something more concrete about our data center developments going forward.

The portfolio is virtually let on a long-term basis. You can see there is very little variance.

Combined occupancy of the portfolio stood at 98%, WAULT at 7.8 years with the first break at 7.4 years. Top 10 customers, as I said, that's 28 lease agreements, and the biggest one is still KraussMaffei, but when we first contracted them, they were 21%, and now thanks to all this growth, it's only 6% left of the total portfolio, which is now KraussMaffei.

Opel, it's 5.1%, which is a short-term lease, but it will be replaced and we are going to redevelop of course Rüsselsheim, and we expect to be able to do quite a significant uptake in the leases going forward. Our own weighted average lease time on our own portfolio is 9.6 years at the moment.

On the delivery side, and here you see our park in Vejle under construction in Denmark, we delivered 21 buildings, which represented almost 500,000 square meters in gross lettable area. That was €32.9 million rental income, 39 new contracts, and they were 99% let.

As I said, we have a tentative agreement with somebody from the defense sector to take the last unit in these buildings, and it will be 100% leased. 100% will be rated BREEAM actually Excellent, of which 31 percent is BREEAM Outstanding over the last year, which I think in Europe at least we believe we have done the best performance with the rating of BREEAM Outstanding.

You see two of our buildings, the VGP Park Parma in Italy, which last year we delivered to Mutti, the tomato producer, and our park in Kecskemét, where amongst others, we also have Mercedes as a customer. The deliveries in 2025 tending towards logistics, but you see immediately that there is also some quite big productions inside.

Hyundai Mobis was a very nice one. We delivered 50,000 square meters facility in Pamplona, and we delivered to VAT, as I already said, this building for this vacuum valve producer.

On the two pictures which you see VGP Park Córdoba, which is a production by the way, and then you see our VGP Park in Montijo, which we delivered last year, and which for the biggest part is a cooled and deep-cooled warehouse for Logifrio. The portfolio at share has grown organically and completely organically because we only develop everything ourselves and then we place it in our joint ventures, but it has grown at a annual compounded growth rate of 21.9%, and it's gone up from €5 billion to €5.6 billion.

We offloaded since 2022 €3.4 billion of gross asset value into the joint ventures, and this model works very well. We aim to continue to do that.

If you look at it, Germany is still the strongest market, although the others are now growing maybe a little bit faster relatively. The Czech Republic is now almost €1 billion in assets.

Spain is growing quite well, and in the Netherlands, this year will be a huge uptake because we already leased out 60,000 square meters, which is under construction, but we are working on a very big new lease agreement in the Netherlands, which will take out our entire park in Nijmegen. The investment portfolio on 100% view has grown to €8.7 billion, which is up 11% year-on-year, and Western Europe represents 74% of the total portfolio value as of December 2025.

You can see the completed is €7 billion, development land is €717 million or 9% of our total investments, and under construction, we have almost €1 billion, €930 million, which is also 11%. On the development side, the portfolio under construction represents €85.3 million of new leases, and as per today, 43 buildings are under construction, which represent 1 million just 1 million of square meters.

It's 75% pre-let, including pre-lets on development land. When we finalize these LOIs which we have in the pipeline, it will be well over 80%.

I think it's on a very healthy basis at the moment. We have started last year 761,000 square meters of new buildings in 2025, and we have to already start up 450,000 square meters if this materializes, which is already pre-let, which is the highest which we have ever had at the beginning of a year pre-let to be started up in a given year.

That's a very nice forward-looking thing to have. You can see again on the right side, you see our park in Rouen, which is now virtually fully let.

We only have one last unit left and a small one, 4,500 square meters out of the total more than 100,000 square meters, total more than 150,000 square meters which we are constructing there. Then you see our VGP Park in Vejle, Denmark, where we also have one last unit left, also 4,500 square meters.

Again, it's well spread across our geographical footprint. You saw in what is the income-generating assets or the assets overall that Germany in the income is more than 50%.

In what is under development, it's only 36%. Here you see that the other countries are relatively growing a little bit faster now.

They also are becoming more and more mature. France is a big market, Spain is a big market, the United Kingdom, I'm sure, will come up to speed soon, we think that we'll be able to do some very nice developments all over Europe.

2025 was also the first year where we had buildings under construction in literally every country where we are active in. That's never happened before, now we have everywhere now buildings under construction.

On the land bank, the picture you see is our beautiful park in Nijmegen, where we have Ahold Delhaize and bol.com in one of these buildings which you see. The land bank in front, that's only a very small part of it because we still have more than 20 hectares available where we now have started ground works already and we are already under construction for one client, which we signed at the end of last year, Pragma Trading, and then we have signed an LOI for the rest of the land bank.

The land bank, of course, it's something I am very much dedicated to because it is the source of our future growth as we develop everything ourselves. The land bank, Piet likes to make bridges, we have also this in a nice bridge.

We owned in 2024 when we started or beginning of 2025 7.4 million square meters, which is fully permitted, by the way. We acquired 1.37 million of square meters, which we always acquire subject to having the permit in place, so that's also fully permitted.

We deployed 1.6 million square meters last year. We sold a couple of square meters, but that's nothing.

Then so we owned at the end of 2025 7.09 million square meters. In December we had 3.15 million square meters of committed, so that's land which we have binding agreements on and which we then buy at the moment when we have the permit in order to use it for its intended purpose.

That brings the owned and committed in December 2025 to 10.25, and we have another under option and pre-contract of 1.51 million square meters. This means that roughly, because the 4.3 million is just the ground floor space, you need to calculate mezzanines and offices to it, but at least 4.5 million can be developed on this total land bank versus the seven and a bit million of buildings which we currently have either finished or under construction.

I also try to take a very pragmatic look at the land bank, and everywhere we need to have a nice margin, which of course in Germany the yields are a bit lower than the exit yields than they are, for example, in Romania, but we try to target everywhere the same margin. We have been able to target lands in all of our countries, and the land bank is geographically well diversified.

We have some specific countries we really need to take a look at going forward, but we were able to secure quite some really nice land plots, and I will talk a bit about it also in the outlook later on. This is the first part of our operational results.

I'll come later back to the JVs, but I'm now going to first give the word to Martijn to talk a little bit about our renewable energy company and its income.

Thank you, Jan. First giving a short overview of how our renewable energy business has now actually developed two segments.

Jan already mentioned it at the beginning. Photovoltaic has continued to grow, and we added a good 50% to the revenues for the photovoltaic business.

Something that is still a bit nascent, but for which we see good prospects, is on the battery projects. You see there's in total 258 projects on the photovoltaic side.

There's a few less on the battery side, but actually in terms of investments, we see a good opportunity both to deploy capital. There's around €4 million invested now, but, yeah, we see that grow substantially over the coming 2 years.

Certainly if you see the megawatt-hour deployment, yeah, that becomes, with 173, that's a good 30% of the total in renewable energy. As Jan mentioned, also the profitability of this business is typically much better than for the photovoltaic, this will start to add to the EBITDA line for renewable energy in 2026, but even more so in 2027 and onwards.

The big constituent of renewable energy remains the photovoltaic business, certainly in 2025. We've seen a good growth.

As I mentioned, the revenue came from €8.3 million, and we've added another €4 €4 million to the total revenue, which was driven by additional production that was now over 130 GWh. Energy price at which we've been able to sell has remained broadly constant.

If you look at the outlook, we've added another 13% in operational photovoltaic this year, you will start to see that also in the production figures for 2026. Then there's another 35 MWp that is under construction, which we expect to become operational in the course of this year.

I think the last thing to add is that, yeah, the overall yield for photovoltaic has now popped over 10%. The overall investment of the projects that are operational is €110 million in asset.

Gross revenues was €12 million, the gross yield has actually, for the first time now, popped over 10%. Then maybe also briefly on the corporate responsibility.

There is one thing here highlighted on the left-hand side, which was something that was recognized at the end of last year by Time magazine in cooperation with Statista. They've done sort of a science-based and quantitative assessment of all the listed companies across the globe, and based both on our financial revenue growth, as well as the sustainability metrics that we've been able to accomplish in 2025, they've highlighted us as one of the top 100 companies globally in terms of realizing sustainable growth.

I think one of the big contributing factors to that is the EU taxonomy, which you see on the third on the left in the smaller boxes. We've now achieved 68% of the total portfolio, but certainly if you look at the new productions or new construction, we've actually been able to verify EU taxonomy for 95% of the buildings that we are currently constructing.

That's all under the EU taxonomy new construction regime, so that's quite a strict regime, which we've set ourselves, and, yeah, with the 95%, you hear that's really has become our internal market practice to adhere to across the group. A couple of other metrics that we've highlighted here that I'll leave to you to read at your leisure.

I think we can move on to the joint venture update. Jan, back to you.

Yes. Our joint venture model is a little bit the cornerstone of our growth model going forward, and so far, I'll go to the next slide, you can see it's been growing consistently.

We have done a new transaction last year with SAGA, which is our fifth,

fifth,

sixth? Fifth, sixth, whatever you call it, joint venture, and it's now more than 60% invested.

When we are going to do the next transaction, which is planned for the second half of this year, we will be virtually for a big part already fully invested. There will remain some parts of it, but we foresee a very material transaction in the second half year.

We have very positive and constructive talks ongoing also with SAGA to continue with the next stage, a next vehicle, which we would like to start up in the course of 2027 then, going forward, after SAGA is fully invested. If you look at SAGA, well, as I said, it's 60% deployed.

There remains roughly €600 million of gross asset value. As some of the parks which we have transferred have some little spaces left where tenants have expansion option, etc., we think that we will do a transaction which will exceed €500 million in the end of the year, where actually everything is already identified.

We have been able to go a lot faster than originally foreseen, also thanks to the fact that we have enhanced the scope of countries in which we do our investments. In the beginning, what you see, the original scope, the dark green, it was Germany, France, Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary.

We have added to that Denmark, Austria, Italy, and the peninsula, Spain and Portugal. We now have a lot of assets which we can do.

We have 989,000 square meters or 39 assets already spread over all these countries which are inside, and that's 60% of the total gross asset value which we have foreseen to deploy over the first 5-year period, which will become a 3-year period, I think, because by the end of this year, we should normally be fully invested. We also announced today for the first time that we're working with East Capital, a company which we know already for a very long time, very nice people out of Sweden.

I don't know if they're looking, but hello. VGP and East Capital is to set up a partnership to launch a Luxembourg-based real estate investment fund focused on European industrial and logistic real estate with an emphasis on Central and Eastern European countries, not only, but mostly.

The targeted gross asset value we have agreed upon is at least €1.5 billion. We hope to be able to do a first closing, and we trust to be able to do a first closing in 2026 in the second half of the year.

VGP intends to keep up to 50%, and the remaining equity should come from third-party investors. The management will be shared between parties.

There is no difference in between the asset management and property management profile which we had with the former joint ventures. It will be the same.

It will be East Capital's responsibility to do the fundraising and to do a little bit of investment advisory. What we are going to buy will be income-generating assets, all ESG-aligned, in the countries which you see, it will come a little bit from everywhere, but with an emphasis on Central and Eastern European countries.

That's it a bit on the JVs, and I will give the word now to my brother Piet for to explain the financial performance. By the way, what you see on the picture is our park in Serbia, where the building on the right side is Ahold Delhaize, which we have built brand-new, which is taken into operation, and the second building, the main tenant there is the Metro Group, and both buildings have been also delivered and both buildings also are BREEAM Excellent awarded.

You stole my intro, Jan.

Sorry.

As always, I have prepared for you a usual slide deck with P&L, balance sheet, cash flow movements, and some further details. I'm happy to walk you through and also happy to report an increase in our profitability from pre-tax €319 million to €338 million.

As always, there is really a lot playing through our P&L, given the fact that we have a hybrid model between own developments and a JV. I think the best thing is, as also in former formats, to walk you through it in the more line-by-line.

We had an issue with some sound, so. First and foremost, you see that our net rental and renewable energy income, it has increased with 31% to €88.7 million.

Basically exists out of the gross rental income or the rental income and the renewable income. The gross rental income on our own balance sheet increased 32.7%, which is €86.7 to €86.7 million.

If you look at it on a proportional basis, meaning this €86.7 million and our share in the joint ventures gross rental income, this effectively grew from €203 million to €235.5 million of gross rental income. Maybe just to make a quick recap to what has Jan been presenting before is we have in the group, on an annualized basis, €468 million of contracted rental income.

From that €468 million, €146.6 million is in our own balance sheet, of which €78 million is active. That €78 million could compare to this €86.7 million, but it is in fact more.

That is because, of course, we had done a transaction with SAGA at the year-end, and that still delivered us €15 million of rental income, that portfolio, before we transferred it into the JV. On an annualized basis, that transfer was actually €29 million of rental income.

That's it about the rental income, good positive increase, all build up organically. In terms of the renewable income, we also see a strong increase, 43% to €11.9 million, coming from €8.3 million on gross renewable income.

As Martijn has presented, this was an effective increase in production from 90 GW to 132 GW, or a 47% increase. That brings it down on a net rental and renewable energy income an increase from €67.7 million to €88.7 million, but also at share from €189 million to €223 million, or up 18% in comparison to 2024.

The next line in our P&L is the joint venture management fee or the joint venture fee income. It's €32.7 million last year that grew with 59% to €52 million.

Here there are also quite some particularities. The joint venture fee income basically exists now out of three components.

One is our property facility or asset management fee, which on a recurring basis grew with €4 million. Then there is also provision for €18.4 million on a promote.

Just as a quick reminder, we have multiple joint ventures. The first joint venture, Rheingold, comes up to maturity in May 2026.

It has already been extended for 10 years, but after the 10-year or the lapse of the 10-year period, VGP is entitled to a promote based on the net IRR performance of that joint venture. Now the net IRR performance, and we are particularly proud of it, has been very good.

We have a 12.4%. This is really net IRR, really on a cash-level basis, after all asset management fees, taxes, and whatsoever.

Since we have surpassed the hurdle, we have now, at 31st of December, booked a provision of €18.4 million. This provision, of course, will be updated in the first half at 31st of May, based on the valuation of the portfolio as of then plus its operational performance, it is our best estimate based on the track record until 31st of December.

Then finally, the remaining part is the development management income. We perform works on behalf of the joint venture.

This decreased with €3.2 million to €2.5 million, but overall, the joint venture management fee significantly increased to €52 million. On a recurring basis, we do expect it to increase further in 2026 because we have done a transactions, for instance, in December, where we also have an asset management fee on, which will be accounted for in 2026, plus then, of course, all of the transactions that we foresee to do, one with SAGA and also with the new East Capital fund, which will also lead into increases of our fee income with the JVs.

The next line, and that's always a strong influencer on our P&L, that's the net valuation gains that we record on the investment properties. These increased from €187.1 million to €243.6 million, and they are actually composed out of two.

Jan has already hinted to it also that we have an unrealized gain of €183 million, which is an increase of €89 million, which is mainly related to our development activities, that's the profit on our developments, whereas there is also a second component, which is the realized gains. That means that we have sold assets towards the JVs or, for instance, also the disposal of VGP Park Riga at a higher level than it had been recorded for in our books versus the fair value in our books.

This led to a €60.5 million additional profit. Our own portfolio has a weighted average yield of 7.48% versus 7.22%.

Of course, the number, sometimes we get a question, is a bit higher than in our JVs, but in JVs, it's 5.22%. That is because it's more skewed to Western European countries in the JVs and fully stabilized assets, whereas here we are still having assets under construction and also quite some Central and Eastern European assets, which have a higher yield, on which, of course, we have also now the nice opportunity with East Capital.

The next line on our P&L is the administration expenses. They are quite, you could say, broadly in line with last year, from €61 million to €63 million.

In average, the remuneration went up with €1.6 million, but we also had a depreciation increase of €2.2 million. That is mainly related to our renewable energy installations, which are recognized in a cost model, at acquisition cost and depreciated.

We have a €5 million increase in general admin, part of that was also the marketing campaign that we launched in 2025. Then since we have more assets under construction in comparison to previous years, we have also higher capitalized expenses on our assets or investment property, which offsets the extra cost of the above with €6.7 million.

At year-end, we have 434 FTE. The next line is the share in the net profit, and there we actually see a decline from €92.7 million to €41.3 million.

I can actually explain, I think, what has happened there in the bridge versus last year. First and foremost, the net rental income increased from €121 million to €134.7 million, that's an increase of 10.7%.

The big driver or change in the JVs is the net valuation gains, where it was a positive of €54 million, it actually reduced with €65 million to minus €10 million. This was driven by a number of facts.

One is we've done a few settlements with the JVs, where the JV had to pay us a top-up on previous closings, which was a negative impact on the valuation in the JVs. The second element was mainly that there was and there is a strong German portfolio inside of the JVs, which was negatively impacted by a valuation change.

The average yields went from 5.05% to 5.22% in the JVs, and the German part was a de-valuation of approximately 2%. The appraiser effectively reviewed its prime yields for the country, and as Jan was referring to before, also had updated also his discounted cash flow model foreseeing rather a 18-month vacancy period than a 12-month vacancy period when contracts would come to an end.

Now, as we mentioned before, we do not see that trend at all in our German portfolio. In fact, everything what we re-leased last year was at 21% prices averagely higher, as well as the average term to re-lease something was 2 days.

We didn't really see this, but nonetheless, it did impact a bit our German portfolio and within the joint ventures. Then the other expenses that you see there, it's actually the promote, at share.

All of these what you see on the bottom table is at share, it's €18.4 million for us, but it's a cost to the JV, and at share, since we own 50% in the JVs, it's €9.2 million. Admin expenses were broadly in line, and I think if we disregard once the valuation movements, then we are actually seeing a very strong set of EPRA results on the joint ventures, which is a testament to the very strong operational performance of the joint ventures because the EPRA earnings are up 25%, but also our cost ratios are down.

In general, we are actually very satisfied with the performance of the joint ventures, hence also, for instance, the above 12% net IRR that we could achieve on the Rheingold joint venture. Next point in our P&L is the net financial result, which went from an income to a cost of €24 million.

This is, of course, we raised €576 million of debt last year at a coupon of 4.25%, which gives already a delta in a higher interest cost. On the other hand, also in 2024, we profited quite a lot, also in 2025, but the interests came down on interest on cash on hand.

We usually put quite some money on term loans and try to optimize it maximally as possible. Last year, this was an income for us of €12 million, now it was €5 million, it's a decrease of €7 million.

We have some higher capitalized interests of €3 million. That is because we, just like the capitalization on the admin expenses, we have higher amount or volume of assets under construction, it leads to a higher capitalized interest of €3 million.

We have a decrease in our interest income from the JVs. I would say the shareholder loans in the JVs, they effectively increased, but of course, there have been distributions through repayments of shareholders during the year.

Only at the end of the year, we created a new shareholder loan with the SAGA joint venture because the transaction only materialized in the second half of December. Also, we partly capitalized part of the non-current receivables, also the shareholder loans, on the DEKA JV, which also decreased a bit the interest income.

Then finally, as you may recall, we raised €576 million of bonds, but we also bought back in 2025 €200 million worth of bonds, for which we paid €195 million, we made a profit on that of €5 million. Going to the next slide.

It doesn't want to go to the next slide.

It did.

Okay. Where Jan also already referred to, and it's a particularly good performance over EBITDA.

The EBITDA is up €100 million versus 2024, up to €455 million or an increase of 28%. The increase is to be noted in all of our segments.

In the investment segment, where we show the EBITDA of our completed portfolio excluding any valuation gains, you see an EBITDA going from €240 million to €249 million. This represents actually, if you look at into a balance sheet, €2.9 billion of our total assets.

In terms of development, as I explained before, net valuation gains, the €243 million composed of the good development profit traction that we have. The good traction that we have on the development profits and the realized gains, our EBITDA also increased from €145 million to €199 million.

Then the gross renewable energy also has a nice EBITDA increase, given also the 47% extra production that we managed to produce in '25, or a 43% increase in its gross renewable energy income. In terms of the balance sheet, we see a strong increase of our total assets and total liabilities from €4.6 billion to €5.2 billion.

The investment property is now €2.4 billion, which of course composed of a completed portfolio of €915 million, under construction €777 million versus €579 million, you see here also the increase versus '24, and then development land, as we did buy quite some very attractive land plots, also increased from €645 million to €728 million. We did about a total CapEx of €660 million, which is composed of about €490 million on assets and €150 million roughly on land acquisitions.

I mentioned already the weighted average yield of our investment property, 7.48%. The property, plant, and equipment, €141 million, it's an increase of €18 million versus last year.

This is mainly related to our renewable energy installations, where we had a €19 million CapEx, and the completed installations where also then the €11.9 million of gross rental renewable energy income is coming from, is generated from a complete installation of €109 million, and what is still under construction is €18.6 million. Our investments in joint ventures increased quite significantly with €109 million.

Now we have done quite some transactions with the JVs, not only the SAGA closing, but as I mentioned also before, there were some settlements on previous closings, which were to the benefit of us, which increased the equity contribution into our joint ventures altogether with roughly €100 million or €98 million. Then we of course have, since it's reported under equity method, the allocation of our result or our share in the result of the JVs, which is €41 million.

Then we received equity repayments from the JVs, dividends of €30 million. I will come back on the distributions of the joint ventures in the cash flow statement.

I already mentioned the other non-current receivables, they increased with €63 million following the transactions with SAGA, but we also got €32 million of joint venture loan repayments. These were the two main movements, I would say, on the non-current receivables.

Then we ended the year with a cash position of €523 million, about €31 million more than we had last year. On the disposal group held for sale, the €27 million, that is the VGP Park Tīraine, which is going to be sold in H1, 26, that is under a call option of its tenant.

It's located in Latvia, and the transaction is about to be materialized, everything is more or less done. The shareholders' equity increased, as already mentioned before, from €2.4 billion to €2.6 billion, very easy movement, €290 million profit, €90 million dividend going out, so that makes the movement there.

Then in terms of our financial liabilities, that increased from €2 billion to €2.360 billion. This follows a €576 million bond that we raised in H1.

It was actually €500 million with a top-up of €76 million. Then from out of that, we did a tender on our outstanding bonds of January '27 and '29 of €200 million.

'27 was reduced with €179.9 million, the one of '29 was reduced with €20.1 million, but we effectively paid €195 million on that. Then there was also a bond that came to maturity in March of €80 million, which was also repaid.

Then we moved to current financial debts at year-end now the €190 million bond, which is due in March. I'll come back on the debts also on one of the next slides.

Our average cost of debt is now at 2.7% as at 31st of December '25. As you may recall, we have also revolving credit facilities, which are untapped, they amount to €500 million.

We increased them during the year, and we also prolonged them. There's more info to that in our press release on what and to what extent it has been prolonged.

In the end, it comes up to a consolidated gearing ratio of 35% or a proportional LTV of 50%. We also have a Fitch and also, since 2025, an S&P Global rating, both investment grade with BBB- and a stable outlook.

I already made a reference to this, I think, on the previous slide. Our average cost of debt increased to 2.7%.

We have a significant liquidity position and the bond maturities, and I've updated it here already given the January '26. In January '26, a few weeks ago in fact or 1 month ago, we raised €600 million bond, and from that bond, we also repaid €100 million on the outstanding January '27 bond, which was originally €500 million.

We reduced it with €180 million in '25, and we reduced it again in January with €100 million, it's now still €220 million. Then the remaining bonds to be paid are listed there, but you can see the one in 2025 has a maturity, the €576 million in '31, and the new one which was raised in January has a maturity in 2032.

Speaking of the cash flow statement, we started the year with €492 million. The net cash generated from operating activities is €51 million.

Just as a side note, we did an update to our cash flow this year, where interest paid, as you can see now in financing activities, has been moved from operating to financing activities, we felt it's more correct there. It has also been restated in '24, we go from €33 million to €51 million.

I have a bridge on the left, but in essence, we have spent €171 million in investing activities. The proceeds from disposal, the €389 million, is related to the SAGA JV and the disposal of Riga plus some settlements with the joint ventures.

From the €660 million of CapEx that we see on investment property, an effective €642 million has been spent. The remaining will move through our working capital on CapEx payables.

Loans to JVs is a loan to one of our development joint ventures. Then distributions by joint venture, where I referred to before, €82.7 million, broadly in line with last year.

The €82.7 million is a combination of interest payments of €20 million, shareholder repayments of €32 million, and equity distributions of €30 million. It depends a bit joint venture by joint venture how we take out the excess cash that is inside, that's why I also group it here for simplification purposes, but we all consider this as distributions.

There were no investments in joint ventures, that's mainly then related to development joint ventures. Then in our financing activity, we paid an interest of €48 million, we've paid out the dividend in May of €90 million, which we now propose to increase from €3.3 to €3.4 in '26, so that will go to €93 million as cash out in '26.

Then we had proceeds from loans, which is the bond appraisal of €576 million, after costs and deductions, it's €565 million net cash in. Then the loan repayments, it was a bond that we paid back of €80 million, and then the €200 million that we paid back for €195 million, €195 million plus €80 million is €275 million that we actually repaid.

That means that we end the year with €523 million of cash. I think I maybe explained all of this already, but maybe there's one more nice thing to note that is that we raised the bond in April of €576 million at a coupon of 4.25%.

We did one in January at 4%, but underlying, there is quite a big difference because the €600 million bond that we raised in January was at our historic lowest spread ever, 150 basis points. Of course, it was a bit offset with the increase of interest versus the previous bond, but nonetheless, it was still at a cheaper and it was a very successful transaction that we've done.

Now the maturity profile of our bonds are as follows. I believe this was, I think, my last slide, I hand it over back to Jan.

Yeah. Thank you all for listening until now.

As a summary and the outlook, I am personally very happy that our result, it's even more and more cash generative and that the profitability of our new developments going forward is going up again with all that we are going to start up this year, and we are quite bullish on it. We think that we are having a good year in front of us in 2026.

On the re-lettings, as we have seen, we've never had to transact something to the joint ventures with a loss, and if we look at our re-lettings, they were during 2025 14% higher than the rental price which they were let at before. As Piet already said, on average, it took us 2 days to re-let in Germany, where our re-letting was 21% higher than the one before.

We have heard through the former reporting periods a lot of concerns about the German market, where we have a big exposure to, but we feel very confident inside and we also see a lot of activity. We have a lot of new things going on, we feel really very confident on that.

The margins on our new developments, they are €103 million. There is really a lot in the pipeline, and I already talked about it.

There are a couple of LOIs on which we are now finalizing, cost reimbursement agreements is the better term for it, where we have agreed with tenants mainly out of the e-commerce sector that we already going to line up everything so we can negotiate the relatively complex lease agreements because they are also relatively complex buildings. We are on track to close them all before the end of the first quarter, some of them even in this month, we're really in final, final negotiations.

We already signed one with TEA Capital last week in Bucharest. If we look at it, we see that e-commerce is back on track and starting to look really again.

What they had over rented in 2021 and '22 has now been consumed, and they are back on track with growth, which is, I think, a very positive for us. If these things materialize, we will at least start 450,000 square meters now in 2026, €80 million, which we need to start of rental income, which is already contracted, which is the best position, I think, we've ever had in our history, looking forward.

That's very much supported also by the unlocking of some of the historical, iconical parks which we have bought and which are mainly brownfields, and brownfields are always take a little bit of a longer time to develop. If I look at it, we're going to start construction this year on Lanbarren in Bilbao.

We are going to start demolishing Nuremberg, for which we have a lot of demand, it's a super location, and we're going to start construction. We also are talking to some people out of the defense industry.

We have already paid a visit to Hagen, which we bought just after the year-end with a very big tenant, and which is been welcomed. Hagen is Dortmund, right next to Dortmund.

It's a very nice site, which disposes of a 90 MWp capacity of electricity, which is active, which opens a lot of opportunities for us. We're well proceeding on our Rüsselsheim development, and we're also very well proceeding on our permitting there because we needed to do a new B-plan in Rüsselsheim, in which we also incorporated our data center development, which we aim to do.

I was puzzled by the presentation which Sarah gave to me about data centers coming from Microsoft. If you look at the actual installed capacities in the big conurbations of Europe where everybody talks about, it's actually not that much as you would think.

London is 1.7 GW, Frankfurt also. If you think about us in Rüsselsheim probably being able to do quite a bit more than 100 MW, that gives a total different perspective about the possibilities of our land plots.

We also have a very nice opportunity in Italy, and we're looking at other land plots in Germany. We think that that would be nice.

We also are going to have Verona coming online this year, our new land plot in Vélizy, Paris, which is now for which we have also received a building permit, and for which we're going to sign our first lease in the next couple of weeks. All in all, we think that we have a very sunny future in front of us, as you can see on this picture, which is our park in Montijo, which is in Portugal.

Then of course, we're looking very much forward to the further diversification of our joint venture model. We are in continuous talks with our friends from AREIM to do the follow-up of our SAGA transaction, and also now we have announced it now publicly, we're very much looking forward to our cooperation with East Capital.

Now we have two legs to stand on then going forward, and we hope it's going to be a big success. That's a bit, I think, the summary and the outlook for the next year, and I think that we could now move to questions from your side.

Hi, good morning. Thank you for taking my question.

I've got a question mainly around also the new partnership with East Capital. I see on the slide you mentioned potential for at least €1.5 billion of gross asset value in scope.

I was just thinking maybe, part of the agreement, if you could give some more details on kind of what that total investment volume could scale to, if you've agreed a time frame or a target to reach that fully invested level, and whether the structure is broadly similar to what you've agreed in prior partnerships. Thank you.

Yeah. Shall I take it?

We can develop up on the total land bank at the moment roughly something between 6.5 to 7 billion of new assets, which they are including what we still have on our balance sheet, so that is all possible to transfer into new joint ventures going forward. We have already envisaged, and we've already defined, quite a large portfolio which we could transact because it's already income-generating and delivered in this year.

We have said we want to do at least €1.5 billion. I think we're targeting more something like €2 billion, but that is momentarily view at the moment when we start.

It can also grow bigger. We were very confident on the fact that we are going to be able to deliver, well, VGP is delivering all the time new assets and all the time starts up new assets, it will keep on growing in the future.

I think in general it's indeed more or less a copy of our current joint venture model with an investment period 3, 4, 5 years, and what we develop, we will offer, and it's broadly similar. We will retain the asset management services, that's as it is in the current joint venture basically.

Structurally it's actually the same. What is different is that we are not targeting one single partner per JV, but that we are targeting multiple partners at the other side, more something like a fund structure than just a single JV with one single investor at the other side.

Okay?

Yes. Good morning.

Thanks for the presentation. I hope you can hear me.

I had a follow-up question also on the JV, just to understand from the fundraising perspective, what kind of pre-commitment do you have from the third-party investor because you mentioned a closing in the course of the year. I would say, the equity already been raised within the fund?

What confidence do you have on that front? Also on the structure, is it a closed-end or open-ended fund?

It's foreseen to be a closed-end fund, and the raising of the funds is an ongoing exercise, which East Capital is predominantly occupied with, knowing that, of course, East Capital has a solid investor base inside of their existing funds. This is an addition, more of a unique product that they can offer, but it is an addition to what they have in their current fund business.

The exercise is currently ongoing. We are targeting a closing by the end of the year.

I think that's about it what we can say today, yeah.

Yes. It's a regulated business, Vivien, raising capital, we can't really say what's been committed already.

It's prescribed quite precisely what can and cannot be said in such exercises.

Then just on the shared management agreement, as understand that deviate a bit from the previous joint venture, what does it mean for you in term of recurring income you're going to drive from that joint venture?

We expect a similar income model that we have with our current joint ventures also. There is indeed a sharing of services with East Capital, but that it's somewhat similar, for instance, with what an AREIM or an Allianz also does with their investors behind who are invested into our joint venture.

East Capital will mainly look into gathering the funds and also doing the investor relations with the investors that they have been able to target, but other than that, our services remain the same. We expect broadly the same revenues to be incurred from all of the disposals into the JVs.

Yes, hi. Good morning.

Thanks for the presentation. I've got two questions.

One is a small one on East Capital, if I can bother you with that, is does the new fund also allow for countries that were not eligible for the other joint ventures to be transferred? I'm thinking, for instance, on Serbia or maybe other countries that you can now offload more into the future.

The East Capital fund is a pan-European fund, every country where we are active in is in fact targeted, but it will be skewed more to the Central and Eastern European countries, but in essence, all countries are on the target list of the fund.

Thanks. Then a follow-up, if I may, it's really on this valuator's increase in yields in Germany, and then especially in the JVs to 5.22%, which you explained that it's based on vacancy.

Now, you obviously had good leasing activity, which you explained many times, but could that be a timing difference because they do that at the end of the year, whereas you have done the re-leasing of the year? Can you give an indication of the amount of re-leasing you have to do in '26, and what you expect from that?

We have very little releasing to be done in 2026, and so far what we see is that again, also for the things in 2026 which are coming available, we already know on beforehand, and mostly months on beforehand, that we are going to have a follow-up tenant. What the valuators have taken as an assumption from a 12-month vacancy period, which we never had in Germany, to an 18-month vacancy period, we find it, and we've tried to argue about it, but they take a view of the market, we can't say that we see that reflected in our own portfolio.

I don't know what it's about, maybe it's about older buildings or maybe it's about the total market view, but in our own portfolio, Wim, we are very confident that we have solid demand for everything, we don't see, neither expect, any deterioration of that in the months going forward. On the contrary, we have a lot of new lease negotiations ongoing, also for new buildings.

Maybe if I may, because what we see or what we hear from WDP and Montea is that they can't find anything to buy above 5%. Could there be deals maybe in the near future that could review their case, that if we see that, yeah, yields come down in deals, is that something that you expect?

We hope so. We certainly hope so.

Also the promote calculation which we've done is based on our RICS valuation at the year-end, it's just our current valuation where when we are going to have the valuation in May, that's going to be based on the capital markets valuation where the valuator really looks at the transactions as if we were to really sell, and that's probably going to be a little bit different. We don't know, north or south, but we think it's going to be different than what is our RICS valuation.

Until now, every transaction which we have done with our joint venture partners, when we had a real discussion about the valuation, we always achieved a better exit yield than what we had it in our books for. Of course, we want to be a fair partner, but we are trying, of course, to defend our position also.

That is more than normal, I think, in business. I don't

They still have [unclear].

Hi, good morning. Thanks for the presentation.

At the end of last year, you had 780,000 square meters under construction. Deliveries came just short of 500,000 square meters.

Were there some delays in the deliveries, and if so, what has been the reason for these delays? Looking at your pipeline going forward, it's currently standing at pre-let ratio of 75%, and you are saying that you're seeing quite some strong demand.

How do you think about the size of the pipeline under construction, and what are your thoughts about more speculative developments over the next 12 months?

Yeah. It when you when you report, you always have a cut-off, which is at the 31st of December, and you need to take a look at it, whereas in development, it's not always really linear.

You have sometimes customers which have demands for changes in the building, which entail relatively complicated situations in and which which makes the delivery going over the reporting period. That's one of the of the things where we are.

I I think you need to look over a period of a longer period of time to see really the tendency, and not just in the cut-off of one 6 months period. That's the thing.

We I wanted I want it to be, although we have a big incentive to construct more because we now have our costs really back under control as inflation has come down tremendously and in the construction industry in every country at the moment, we can achieve attractive pricing. At the same time, we're also trying to manage our portfolio so not to create too many vacancy or or too many speculative buildings.

We look at on a country-by-country basis, but we try to limit really our speculative buildings to an acceptable level, which for us is it should be we should be pre-let above 70%, and ideally by 8 months under construction, we should be above 80% after 6 months under construction above 80%, which we currently also are. That's that's the parameters in which we make the decision internally do we do speculative speculative developments, yes or no.

It's also depending on the demand which we see in the locations because not all countries run at the same pace at the moment. We we are also a bit a bit careful in starting up too much square meters where we don't see the demand for it, and on the contrary, where we see a lot of demand, we start up a little bit more.

As I already said, and I hope I was I I it came across enough, at the moment, we really have a very strong pipeline in demand. We divide up our demand, we categorize it in a first contact, a second a second where we already have commercial negotiations, a third where we have virtually an LOI agreed, and a fourth where we started the negotiations on the lease agreement.

If I take the two last the two last things, we have roughly 50 million of negotiations ongoing, which I don't say we're going to sign all of it, but it's a very healthy indication that there is really demand which wants to contract at some point because people don't engage with teams and with lawyers and with things if they have no intention to close the lease agreement. From that point of view, we at VGP, with our current portfolio and our land bank and the quality of what we offer, we feel comfortable to start a bit more construction over the year.

I can't tell you a number. As I already said, we have roughly 450,000 which we need to start up anyway because it's already pre-let if these LOIs also materialize.

Then, of course, we'll do a bit more because it will bring our our vacancy levels our our our pre-let levels up, and then we have a bit more room to also start a bit of speculative buildings in those jurisdictions where we feel demand is is strong and supply very low.

Good morning, everybody. I have two questions.

The first one is about guidance. Understand that you never disclose a guidance, but can you just give at least some qualitative type of comments on 2026?

Consensus is pretty dispersed, and it doesn't help. Then the second question is on data centers.

You managed to hire a dedicated person. Can you provide an update about the opportunities you see here?

Many thanks.

Hello, Francesca. Indeed, it's a bit difficult for us to give a guidance because we are not a REIT.

Our VGP is a multi-line model where we have the development portfolio, where we have the rental income, and it's different than a REIT. If you would only look at a REIT, it would be a little bit more easy to say what it's going to do.

Going forward, we can also maybe make a projection of the rental income, what we expect for the year, but also there, because we always transact between our own balance sheet and the JVs, it's not so easy to give you a reasonable view because there is always movements from rental income, which is either on our own balance sheet, and then it goes into the JVs, and then it only accounts for 50%. We'd rather not say something which we then cannot fulfill.

We only always give guidance on things where we think that they are achievable, and where we feel ourselves also comfortable that we can achieve. Far, I think we've never promised something which we haven't delivered.

That's something which we're proud of. On the data center things, we are not actively buying land plots with the aim of developing really a data center.

I see too many accidents in the market. Just last week, there was a big announcement in the press in Germany where a 2.7 billion investment in Groß-Gerau was stopped by the local authorities.

People had paid a tremendous land price for it and done all the efforts, and then it was stopped. It is really a very risky business because we have a huge congestion in electric energy, and starting to buy the land plot and then going for it, it is a very difficult business going forward.

VGP has a very big land bank. The very big land bank has some brownfields.

Those brownfields come with a very big historical electric connection, which is there and available, and that's already very big part of the transaction. By coincidence, we are also 10 minutes away from Frankfurt Airport in Rüsselsheim.

We've signed an agreement with Stellantis that the only one who can develop a data center on that land plot they also still have a big reserve, but we have an exclusivity on data centers. We have an agreement with the city on where the data center will come and that it is going to be incorporated, it's currently part of the new B-plan.

Sarah is working on that one, and another one in Milan, where we also have a similar constitution, and where we also have very intensive negotiations ongoing with most of the hyperscalers and some of the colocation investors, and where she's trying to manage that. We are trying to take a look at where in the value scale from just selling the land to core and shell to power shell to completely finished built-to-suit and then to completely finished and operational, what we are going to offer and whether we should do that alone or whether we should do that with a partner who has already all the accredity because he already has done something.

As you can hear from me, we are in a very intense process of aligning ourselves in order to be able to bring the best result. This is a work which is not like developing a logistic warehouse.

There are so many parts running around that it really doesn't go so quick. Also the energy connection, it's not from today on tomorrow.

Yes, in our case, it is, and then there is also the connectivity, the grid, etc., which you need to do for. Then we still have also to demolish in Rüsselsheim because now there is building standing on it.

It is not for tomorrow, but we're well on track. That's everything which I can describe about it and disclose about it.

Hi, guys. Apologies, a couple of questions for me.

Just wanted to come back on the pre-letting point because I think that's been declining since 2022. I think you had a high of 89%, now you're down at 69%.

Just wonder what level are you comfortable going to in terms of pre-letting level, and what gives you the comfort in starting more and more speculative schemes, as you have been over the last few years? Second question is linked to that, is just looking at the yield on cost on completed developments, did you have to give any rent concessions to lease these up?

I think in the past, you've talked of tenant incentives or rent-free periods, just to get a sense on that. If you could quantify those, would be great.

Then I do have a quick third question, but let's see if you let me ask that one. Thank you.

Paul, on the first one, I think I already answered quite a lot of it, yes, we've done a bit more speculative construction last year because our construction price came so much down. We are currently, after 6 months period, if we look at it, we are 80% pre-let.

We also have a lot of things in the pipeline where we feel very comfortable that we're going to sign it, which will take our pre-lets even more up. We feel comfortable with today's level of pre-lets of speculative buildings under construction because we also see good activity and good demand on that pipeline going forward, and we've built it for a very good price.

On the activity from the tenants, because we did not buy land at excessive prices, and because at the time when the land was so expensive, I told you all, I don't find these things sustainable. In 2022, we really stopped.

We didn't buy anything if you look at it going backwards. We only bought Rüsselsheim, which we bought for a very good price, but the rest we couldn't make working.

Today, we are in a very good position because we can be aggressive on the rental price, but still make a very beautiful margin. Our margin is actually going up instead of going down because we have so good control of our construction cost.

We don't see anywhere where we need to give excessive rental incentives, more than what we have been doing over the last 5 years. It's still the same, it's a healthy market, I would say.

Also the vacancy level which we see today in the market, 6%, it's not like we haven't had before a lot more even than that, and I find it still very healthy that people finally have something they can look at, take a look at, and it's an advantage for us as a developer offering new things where we can be aggressive on the price, that we can grow in a healthy way going forward. Yes, we can be maybe more aggressive than somebody else on some of our land plots because also we act as a general contractor in every country nowadays, and I think we have our things very well under control, it's really going well.

Did you have another question?

No rent incentives.

That's what I said, just answered on, no special rent incentives, yeah. You had a third question, Paul?

Hi, good morning. Thank you for taking my questions.

I have some questions on what to expect for signing new leases. On the LOIs that you mentioned, could you please remind me how much in annualized rental income you expect to sign in Q1?

Second, to respond to John's earlier question, how does the 50 million in lease discussions you talked about compare to 6 months ago?

Hello, Steven. As we said, we don't give guidance, you asked me to give a guidance on the first quarter.

We have really let's say 25 million of lease agreements in final negotiations at the moment ongoing. Whether it will all be signed in the first quarter, I do think so, that there is quite some nice things which are in final negotiations, and that's about the guidance which I can give.

If I look at going backwards, I think that last year we signed a lot of lease agreements, really a tremendous amount of lease agreements, but they were all relative small to the years before when we always had this one or two big ones standing out, which were really very big lease agreements. Last year, it was a lot more spread over many, many little or not little, but smaller lease agreements.

On average, before we signed 22,000 square meters, I think last year on average it was below 20,000 square meters, so that was a bit different in demand than it is maybe today because today again we're looking at some very big leases which we are negotiating on. The one in the Netherlands is huge.

There are a couple of very huge ones in Germany ongoing, there is a very big one in Spain ongoing at the moment in final negotiations, I would say. That's about what we can say about it.

Hi. Just one question on data centers.

I understand your plan to provide concrete plans by the year-end, yes. Maybe you could provide a rough idea about the capacity for Milan and Hagen already, and any indications if it will be power shell or fully fitted?

Considering the high-profile recruitment you've announced, I assume it won't be just powered land.

You're asking me difficult questions to answer, Thomas. Yes, we hired a high-profile person, and she's a very lovely lady if you meet her, with a lot of ambitions, and that's good because that's why we hired her for.

I don't want to say anything about numbers because I'm going to say something and then it's going to be different because we actually don't really know yet. At the moment, we have a 50 MW connection available in Rüsselsheim from the grid.

There is a power plant on our land plot, which is another 100 MW available. The question is, can we use it, yes or no, because it's a gas-powered power plant, and we are looking into it.

We can expand that power plant quite significantly with gas turbines, and the gas can come from several ways, and that's an exercise which is ongoing. It's quite complex to give an answer to your question, as you understand yourself, because we're still looking and puzzling the pieces together.

We need to take a look also at what is acceptable for a hyperscaler, which risk he wants to go because he needs to have absolute reliability and the Tier 2 at least supply of energy, which we don't have our things all aligned yet because it's really complex. The same is ongoing for our land plot in Milan, where yes, we do have an agreement on the power supply, we know plus-minus when this power supply also will be available, but we are dependent on a third party.

Yes, it's a very big capacity which we have been awarded, and the land plot is perfectly suited for it because it lies really on the super location for it. As I said, there is a bit of work to be done on it, and we are going to disclose in the right time, when it's ready to disclose, where we are and what we do.

I don't want to overpromise. I just wanted to give you an update on where we stand today, and that's in all honesty what I can tell you today.

Good day. A lot of questions have already been asked, to be honest.

Maybe to have a view on Allianz and the intention from here, anything new with regard to potential new JV? Then maybe another question, if I look at the sequential increase in H2 from new construction activity, and you mentioned already a good LOI of the month, should we expect H1 2026 to actually be sequentially even more bigger than H2 '25?

Thank you.

I will answer first on your last question. Whether it's going to be more in H2 in H1 versus H2 last year, I don't have immediately in my mind.

We have to start up quite some buildings in the first half year of 2026 because they are pre-let and we need to deliver within a certain time frame, we need to start up. I would need to calculate how much that is going to be for sure in the first half of 2026.

In general, I expect somewhere between the same amount as last year and a bit more to be started up during the year. I think we feel confident that we're going to start up a bit more than last year.

That's the answer on your last question. Then on the first question regarding the JVs, I think we disclosed because it's a regulated business, we've disclosed on the new JVs what we could.

We can't say anything more than what it is. In the current JVs running, actually everything is running well.

There are no divestment plans immediately there. All partners seem to be very happy with the performance of the things.

As Piet said, also the EPRA results of the JVs are outstanding. The relationship, the day-to-day relationship with Allianz, but also with DEKA and all the others, is going very well.

The only real discussion which is ongoing at the moment is about our promote, where we have now tentatively agreed on the matrix of how we are going to do it because originally it was, of course, foreseen that there would be after 10 years a liquidation of the JV, but that is not going to happen, now it's an exercise on which we need to agree. That will crystallize in the next few weeks, but I'm sure and we will find an agreement with Allianz about what it is about.

For the rest, operationally wise, everything is running well. We have also a refinancing upcoming in the Rheingold joint venture.

That's all agreed, we have the term sheet signed, everything is aligned, there is no clouds on the horizon as far as I can see. Everything is good.

I think I answered on your questions.

Yes, I want to thank you all in the first place for being here, both my colleagues and analysts and investors. Thank you very much for listening to what we had to say.

I'm looking forward to speaking to you again on our annual shareholder meeting maybe, or then in August with the update of our half-year results, and then we have this thing here, or maybe before on some conference. I hope that I can see all of you soon.

As you could have heard from our side, it was a very busy year because we've done so many things, and going forward and it's grown all the time. All in all, I have a good confidence in our sector that it has still a lot of growth capacity and growth possibilities, and that VGP can play a significant role in that, and I hope all the others too, there is room enough on the market.

Thank you for listening, and goodbye.

Goodbye. Thank you.

Thank you.